0 Bewertungen0% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (0 Abstimmungen)
31K Ansichten58 Seiten
U.s. District Court in san jose, california, has issued a ruling in a patent reexamination case. Case involves Samsung Electronics' defenses that its '172 patent is invalid. The USPTO concluded that the prior art identified in the Office Action is the same or in the same family as the prior art asserted by Samsung in this case.
Originalbeschreibung:
Originaltitel
14-08-07 Samsung Filing on Office Action in Reexamination of Apple's '172 Patent
U.s. District Court in san jose, california, has issued a ruling in a patent reexamination case. Case involves Samsung Electronics' defenses that its '172 patent is invalid. The USPTO concluded that the prior art identified in the Office Action is the same or in the same family as the prior art asserted by Samsung in this case.
U.s. District Court in san jose, california, has issued a ruling in a patent reexamination case. Case involves Samsung Electronics' defenses that its '172 patent is invalid. The USPTO concluded that the prior art identified in the Office Action is the same or in the same family as the prior art asserted by Samsung in this case.
Case5:12-cv-00630-LHK Document1951 Filed08/07/14 Page1 of 2
1 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN, LLP 2 Charles K. Verhoeven (Bar No. 170151) charlesverhoeven@quinnemanuel.com 3 Kevin A. Smith (Bar No. 250814) kevinsmith@quinnemanuel.com 4 50 California Street, 22nd Floor San Francisco, California 94111 5 Telephone: (415) 875-6600 Facsimile: (415) 875-6700 6 Kevin P.B. Johnson (Bar No. 177129) 7 kevinjohnson@quinnemanuel.com Victoria F. Maroulis (Bar No. 202603) 8 victoriamaroulis@quinnemanuel.com 555 Twin Dolphin Drive, 5th Floor 9 Redwood Shores, California 94065 Telephone: (650) 801-5000 10 Facsimile: (650) 801-5100 11 William C. Price (Bar No. 108542) williamprice@quinnemanuel.com 12 Michael L. Fazio (Bar No. 228601) michaelfazio@quinnemanuel.com 13 865 South Figueroa Street, 10th Floor Los Angeles, California 90017-2543 14 Telephone: (213) 443-3000 Facsimile: (213) 443-3100 15 Attorneys for SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., 16 LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. and SAMSUNG 17 TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC 18
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
19
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION
20 APPLE INC., a California corporation,
Plaintiff,
21 22
CASE NO. 12-CV-00630-LHK
STATEMENT OF RECENT DECISION (L.R. 7-3(d))
vs.
23 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
Korean business entity; SAMSUNG 24 ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York corporation; SAMSUNG 25 TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, 26 Defendants. 27 28 Case No. 12-CV-00630-LHK STATEMENT OF RECENT DECISION (L.R. 7-3(d))
Case5:12-cv-00630-LHK Document1951 Filed08/07/14 Page2 of 2
Pursuant to Local Rule 7-3(d), Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung
2 Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively
3 Samsung) bring to the Courts attention an Office Action by the United States Patent and 4 Trademark Office (USPTO) in the ex parte reexamination of U.S. Patent Number 8,074,172 (the 5 172 patent) dated August 5, 2014. This Office Action is relevant to Samsungs invalidity 6 defenses for the 172 patent, as described in Samsungs Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law 7 (Dkt. 1896-3, Section III) because the USPTO concluded that the prior art identified in the Office 8 Action is the same or in the same family as the prior art asserted by Samsung in this case. The 9 Office Action concluded that U.S. Patent Number 6,801,190 (Robinson) and International 10 Patent Number WO 2005/008899 (Ng/Xrgomics) anticipate claim 18 of the 172 patent. To 11 the best of Samsungs knowledge, this Office Action was published on the USPTOs Patent 12 Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) website on August 5, 2014. A copy of the Decision on 13 Petition is attached hereto as Exhibit A. 14 15 DATED: August 7, 2014 16
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN, LLP
17 18 19 20 21 22
By /s/ Patrick Curran
Charles K. Verhoeven Kevin P.B. Johnson Victoria F. Maroulis Michael T. Zeller Attorneys for SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., and SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC
23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-
Case No. 12-CV-00630-LHK
STATEMENT OF RECENT DECISION (L.R. 7-3(d))
Case5:12-cv-00630-LHK Document1951-1 Filed08/07/14 Page1 of 56
Case5:12-cv-00630-LHK Document1951-1 Filed08/07/14 Page2 of 56
Case5:12-cv-00630-LHK Document1951-1 Filed08/07/14 Page3 of 56
Case5:12-cv-00630-LHK Document1951-1 Filed08/07/14 Page4 of 56
Case5:12-cv-00630-LHK Document1951-1 Filed08/07/14 Page5 of 56
Case5:12-cv-00630-LHK Document1951-1 Filed08/07/14 Page6 of 56
Case5:12-cv-00630-LHK Document1951-1 Filed08/07/14 Page7 of 56
Case5:12-cv-00630-LHK Document1951-1 Filed08/07/14 Page8 of 56
Case5:12-cv-00630-LHK Document1951-1 Filed08/07/14 Page9 of 56
Case5:12-cv-00630-LHK Document1951-1 Filed08/07/14 Page10 of 56
Case5:12-cv-00630-LHK Document1951-1 Filed08/07/14 Page11 of 56
Case5:12-cv-00630-LHK Document1951-1 Filed08/07/14 Page12 of 56
Case5:12-cv-00630-LHK Document1951-1 Filed08/07/14 Page13 of 56
Case5:12-cv-00630-LHK Document1951-1 Filed08/07/14 Page14 of 56
Case5:12-cv-00630-LHK Document1951-1 Filed08/07/14 Page15 of 56
Case5:12-cv-00630-LHK Document1951-1 Filed08/07/14 Page16 of 56
Case5:12-cv-00630-LHK Document1951-1 Filed08/07/14 Page17 of 56
Case5:12-cv-00630-LHK Document1951-1 Filed08/07/14 Page18 of 56
Case5:12-cv-00630-LHK Document1951-1 Filed08/07/14 Page19 of 56
Case5:12-cv-00630-LHK Document1951-1 Filed08/07/14 Page20 of 56
Case5:12-cv-00630-LHK Document1951-1 Filed08/07/14 Page21 of 56
Case5:12-cv-00630-LHK Document1951-1 Filed08/07/14 Page22 of 56
Case5:12-cv-00630-LHK Document1951-1 Filed08/07/14 Page23 of 56
Case5:12-cv-00630-LHK Document1951-1 Filed08/07/14 Page24 of 56
Case5:12-cv-00630-LHK Document1951-1 Filed08/07/14 Page25 of 56
Case5:12-cv-00630-LHK Document1951-1 Filed08/07/14 Page26 of 56
Case5:12-cv-00630-LHK Document1951-1 Filed08/07/14 Page27 of 56
Case5:12-cv-00630-LHK Document1951-1 Filed08/07/14 Page28 of 56
Case5:12-cv-00630-LHK Document1951-1 Filed08/07/14 Page29 of 56
Case5:12-cv-00630-LHK Document1951-1 Filed08/07/14 Page30 of 56
Case5:12-cv-00630-LHK Document1951-1 Filed08/07/14 Page31 of 56
Case5:12-cv-00630-LHK Document1951-1 Filed08/07/14 Page32 of 56
Case5:12-cv-00630-LHK Document1951-1 Filed08/07/14 Page33 of 56
Case5:12-cv-00630-LHK Document1951-1 Filed08/07/14 Page34 of 56
Case5:12-cv-00630-LHK Document1951-1 Filed08/07/14 Page35 of 56
Case5:12-cv-00630-LHK Document1951-1 Filed08/07/14 Page36 of 56
Case5:12-cv-00630-LHK Document1951-1 Filed08/07/14 Page37 of 56
Case5:12-cv-00630-LHK Document1951-1 Filed08/07/14 Page38 of 56
Case5:12-cv-00630-LHK Document1951-1 Filed08/07/14 Page39 of 56
Case5:12-cv-00630-LHK Document1951-1 Filed08/07/14 Page40 of 56
Case5:12-cv-00630-LHK Document1951-1 Filed08/07/14 Page41 of 56
Case5:12-cv-00630-LHK Document1951-1 Filed08/07/14 Page42 of 56
Case5:12-cv-00630-LHK Document1951-1 Filed08/07/14 Page43 of 56
Case5:12-cv-00630-LHK Document1951-1 Filed08/07/14 Page44 of 56
Case5:12-cv-00630-LHK Document1951-1 Filed08/07/14 Page45 of 56
Case5:12-cv-00630-LHK Document1951-1 Filed08/07/14 Page46 of 56
Case5:12-cv-00630-LHK Document1951-1 Filed08/07/14 Page47 of 56
Case5:12-cv-00630-LHK Document1951-1 Filed08/07/14 Page48 of 56
Case5:12-cv-00630-LHK Document1951-1 Filed08/07/14 Page49 of 56
Case5:12-cv-00630-LHK Document1951-1 Filed08/07/14 Page50 of 56
Case5:12-cv-00630-LHK Document1951-1 Filed08/07/14 Page51 of 56
Case5:12-cv-00630-LHK Document1951-1 Filed08/07/14 Page52 of 56
Case5:12-cv-00630-LHK Document1951-1 Filed08/07/14 Page53 of 56
Case5:12-cv-00630-LHK Document1951-1 Filed08/07/14 Page54 of 56
Case5:12-cv-00630-LHK Document1951-1 Filed08/07/14 Page55 of 56
Case5:12-cv-00630-LHK Document1951-1 Filed08/07/14 Page56 of 56