Collection of 31 Nuke Articles From Wtcdemolition - Blogspot.com (2009)

World Trade Center Demolition
Thursday, December 31, 2009
Permanent Top Post
This site deals primarily with the mechanism of demolition of the WTC and
the likelihood of nuclear bombs being used.
See "China Syndrome at the WTC" for articles pertaining to the

aftermath of the WTC nuclear demolition and the extreme heat phenomena
seen at "Ground Zero".
Just Published: Limited Edition, Nuclear 9/11 Book by The

Anonymous Physicist
See www.anonymousphysicist.com or
freedomringsnow@gmail.com
posted by spooked @ 8:21 PM
Friday, October 23, 2009
Index of Nuke Articles
(click on link to view article)
A Brief Summary: WTC Destruction & High Temperature

Aftermath: ONLY Nuclear Bombs and the China Syndrome
Fit All the Evidence (by The Anonymous Physicist)
35 Reasons for Many Small Fission Nukes at the WTC (by

Spooked)
The Crucial Differences in the Nuclear 9/11 Theories-- A Call

To Eliminate Nuclear 9/11 Mis- or Dis-Information & Attain
Completeness and Fit all the Known Evidence (by The
Anonymous Physicist)
On the Issue of Nuclear Demolition of the WTC and

Radiation (by The Anonymous Physicist)
Original WTC Nuke Thesis from "Anonymous Physicist" (by

The Anonymous Physicist)
If the WTC Nuclear Destruction Had the China Syndrome

Aftermath, Why Didn’t Hiroshima? (by The Anonymous
Physicist)
WTC7 Demolition: Conventional, or Nuclear After All-- and

the Speculative Nuclear Borer Hypothesis (by The
The “China Syndrome” Came to New York City on 9/11 (by

Hanging Skin and Nuclear Blasts. Where in the World is

Felipe David-- and Did He Survive Exposure to Nuclear
Radiation? (by The Anonymous Physicist)
http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/[07.11.2010 14:40:45]
Eyewitness Testimony of Firefighters Believing They Were

Nuked on 9/11 as well as early WTC7 Destruction, EMP, non-
impact plane flyby, and people being pushed out of a WTC
tower (by The Anonymous Physicist)
More Evidence & Testimony Indicating Nuclear Blasts,

Nuclear Radiation, & China Syndrome at the WTC (by The
Proof of the Existence of Mini-Nukes and Micro-Nukes (by

Brief Summary of Evidence of Nuclear bombs used at the

WTC on 9/11/01 (by The Anonymous Physicist)
Was the First Atomic Bomb [in modern times] Exploded on

an American Town by the American Govt? (by The
Could 9/11 Have Been Done With FAE/Thermobaric

Explosives? (by The Anonymous Physicist)
Breakthroughs Toward Attaining A Complete Understanding

of the Nuking of the WTC on 9/11-- The Likelihood of
Sabotaged, Fizzled Nukes (by The Anonymous Physicist)
Basement Nukes and Top-Down Demolition (by Spooked)
Breakthrough: The Story Of Cathy T, & The Large

Earthquake That Was Felt One Mile Away When WTC1 Was
“Hit”! (by The Anonymous Physicist)
More On the Immediate and Continous Radiation Lowering,

and Shielding, Techniques Used at the WTC, after 9/11 (by
The Final Word on The Tritium (by The Anonymous

Physicist)
Exposing The “Red Mercury” Nuclear Scam, & Its Possible

Use In Future Bogus Wars, & Other Crucial Matters On
Nuclear 911, and About Mercury (by The Anonymous
Physicist)
Breakthroughs Towards Attaining A Complete Understanding

of the Nuking of the WTC on 9/11, and its China Syndrome
Aftermath: Part II (by The Anonymous Physicist)
On The Existence of Mini- or Micro-Nukes, Fizzled Nukes,

9/11 & The China Syndrome (by The Anonymous Physicist)
A Summary of Evidence of EMPs (Electromagnetic Pulses)

from the Nukes Used in the WTC on 9/11 (by The Anonymous
Physicist)
WTC Destruction Theories: "DEW" versus

Thermite/Thermate/Super Thermate versus Milli-
Nukes/Micro-Nukes (by Spooked)
Ground Zero Smoking Cannon: Where Are All the Core

Columns and Beams??? (by Spooked)
Micro-Nukes in the WTC--Creating The China Syndrome:

Important Matters of Completeness & Plausibility (by The
Did Two Nuclear Reactors, not Nuclear Bombs, Destroy the

WTC on 9/11? Review of William Tahil’s Book, “Ground Zero:
The Nuclear Demolition of the WTC”, and of his Reactor
Hypothesis (by The Anonymous Physicist)
The Effect of a Low Yield Nuke on a Steel Structure (by

Spooked)
The Fall of the WTC1 Spire and the Intact WTC1 Stairwell:
Proof of Demolition Near Bottom of the Tower (by Spooked)
Further Observations on WTC1 Stairwell B-- 1. Did Pasquale

Buzzelli Surf Down The “Collapse”—or Do Conflicting
Reports Collapse the O.C.T.? 2. Does the Revealed “Upward
Wind” During “Collapse” Prove the Final “Cleaner Nuke”? (by
Thursday, July 02, 2009
The Final Word on The Tritium
by The Anonymous Physicist
I have written, that after long and careful analyses, the best bet for the
main factor that destroyed the WTC on 9/11/01 were numerous, small,
fission bombs. Others have claimed that one (hypothetical) 4th generation,
pure fusion nuclear bomb destroyed each tower. This is what the
anonymous Finnish military expert wrote. And the Finn apparently based
his entire 4th generation pure fusion hypothesis on the finding of tritium at
the WTC on 9/13/01. Since he was the first person to publish any specific
nuclear destruction scenario for 9/11, many others cite his work as being
definitive, or such. (He could still be correct, though this is extremely
unlikely.) And so many who state that they are proponents of the nuclear
destruction hypothesis of the WTC are proponents of the pure fusion
mechanism, because the Finn is; and he cited the Tritium found at the
WTC on 9/13/01. Or there could be a more sinister reason for these
numerous individuals to support the pure fusion scenario.
Now the Finn apparently gave overarching consideration to the Tritium

found and published in the article, “Study of Traces of Tritium at
the World Trade Center” by T.M. Semkow, et al. It was
published at the 223rd American Chemical Society National Meeting,
Orlando, FL, April 7-11, 2002. The article states that “This work was
performed under the auspices of the United States Department of Energy
by the University of California, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
under contract No. W-7405-Eng-48.” (Note that this is the same lab that
allegedly can create “super nano-composite thermite” that yields
“unextinguishable fires,” and thus new laws of chemistry and physics as
well as the first equivalent perpetual motion mechanism. [If only.] It’s also
the same lab that is remasterminding Kennedy Assassination audio tapes.
And I have some suspicions on what the “Eng” might mean.) It should be
noted that this paper contains several bogus and ludicrous attempts to
account for the tritium at the WTC on 9/13. Mostly they allege that the
tritium came from exit signs on the planes that “crashed into the towers.”
The paper also alleges that tritium was in the sightings on the guns of
police officers killed that day. The first “mechanism” is obviously bogus, as
there is not a single video that agrees with reality in that the “planes” are
clearly just CGI broadcast on TV, and there was no credible evidence on
the ground that any planes had crashed into the towers, and did so with
blatantly, obvious impossible crash physics. Sources have also stated that
the tritium claim on gun sightings is also bogus, if not totally, then regarding
the amount.
Being a long-term expert on gov’t conspiracies and crimes, I see the whole
tritium matter very deeply. The regime can and does refuse to release
anything damning. So why did they release any data showing tritium at all,
when they could have kept this under wraps, as I am sure FEMA is doing
with WTC radiation readings? One possible answer is that it would provide
a ruse for others to later claim the mythical 4th generation pure fusion
bomb was used-- thus obviating what was there in NYC for 6 months-- the
China Syndrome. And always remember, we are discussing the Lawrence
Livermore Labs, designers of humanity-exterminating WMD for more than
60 years, as well as the above nefarious actions, related to the thermite
hangout and JFK murder.
Now my first articles on my “many small nukes hypothesis” cited evidence

for both fission and fusion at the WTC. I too ignored one important factor in
these matters for a while-- but I have changed that in later articles and in a
larger work-- but have not played this up at this blog, and wish to rectify
this now. I have also written that it may be more than coincidence that a
4th generation pure fusion bomb does not allow for what we clearly had at
the WTC for up to six months-- the China Syndrome of great heat
GENERATION from the remnants of the many fission bombs,
as each used only about 1-6% of its fissile material. That is,
pure fusion does not allow for the China Syndrome as any remnants of
pure fusion components (such as deuterium or tritium) do not allow for this-
- only Uranium or Plutonium fissioning can. Note that a fission-triggered
fusion bomb could still allow for the China Syndrome. Only the pure fusion
scenario does not. So it is curious that the Finn immediately went with pure
fusion, and not with the possibility of fission-triggered fusion. And the Finn
based this on the tritium finding, and either did not know about, or chose to
ignore, all the evidence of massive heat generation at the WTC for 6
months, and also the following matter.
One factor from nuclear physics has been mostly left out of this “nuclear
choice.” This is TERNARY FISSION, and was included in William Tahil’s
book. Unfortunately that book was shown by this researcher to be incorrect
on several points. These included the “nuclear reactor” hypothesis being
thoroughly unnecessary and impossible, as is his and the Finn’s claim that
a single nuke destroyed each tower. (Tahil also incorrectly stated that a
fission nuke uses up 100% of its fissile material, when it is only 1-6%.) I
have also cited much evidence both of a preliminary sub-basement nuke
timed with the explosions on top (so-called “plane hits”), and that the final
destruction involved numerous small nukes. So the single nuke scenario,
from the Finn and Tahil, is untenable.
Now most fission reactions of Uranium or Plutonium are binary-- they yield
TWO large “daughter elements” (e.g., Barium and Krypton, or Strontium
and Xenon), plus 2-3 neutrons, plus energy in the form of gamma rays. But
since 1959, it has been publicly known, via this article, that ternary
fission yields TRITIUM, along with its THREE daughter elements, plus the
excess neutrons, and energy. And thus with the numerous fission bombs
that were detonated, and with the additional possible factors of redundancy
and fratriciding that my articles have detailed, we can arrive at
perhaps the most likely source of tritium in the rubble-- the fission nukes
themselves. I have seen estimates for the percentage of tritium production
from ternary fission ranging from 1% down to .005%. (There is the
possibility of deliberate disinformation, in some matters of nuclear physics,
so one cannot often trust public nuclear physics discussions.) Because of
this, and not knowing what element(s) were fissioned, nor how much of
each, it is impossible to know just how much tritium could have been
produced by ternary fission in the numerous micro-nukes used to destroy
the WTC. But it appears to be more than would occur from non-existent
planes, or gun sightings; and the proven heat generation of the China
Syndrome Aftermath belies the use of a mythical 4th generation pure
fusion device.
The most likely type of nuclear bombs used, was the type that could be
made the smallest, and was the simplest, and most proven/dependable
(compared to the others). This was the “good old” pure fission form of
nuclear bombs. As I have shown, they’re even backpackable. And in
the final analysis-- given ternary fission-- there never was any basis for
claiming that the nuke(s) used at the WTC had to be 4th generation pure
fusion, nor even that there was any fusion at all at the WTC. We may
never be able to prove exactly what happened regarding the nuclear
destruction of the WTC on 9/11, by the American regime; but we should
strive to emphasize the most likely, and the most dependable factors the
American regime would have used. And we must realize that the regime
wanted to hide the China Syndrome Aftermath, as that poisoned thousands
of responders, and to a lesser extent, millions of metro NY residents.
So any tritium found on 9/13/01 at the WTC, was most likely from ternary
fission, not fusion. But if you want one more, perhaps crucial, plausibility
argument, here it is. Fusion bombs have a history of having a
yield larger than expected. And the perps strenuously wanted NOT
to blow through the building in an obvious nuclear manner. A nuke having
a yield larger than needed could not be risked. This would have been
visible to thousands, perhaps millions; and such knowledge would have
been difficult to contain. (Whereas radiation findings were controlled by
FEMA, and the Gestapo regime need only scream “national security” to
prevent release of such data-- including the tritium paper, if it had wanted
to.) I have emphasized the need not to blow through the building in an
obvious nuclear way, since my very first article herein. This is one reason
why some conventional explosives may have been used during the
destruction scenario, as I have also written.
What the nukes were mainly for, in my estimation, was to vaporize

INSTANTLY, and definitively, the necessary core structure for the
TOWERS’ ENSUING RAPID, APPROXIMATE, FREEFALL RATE OF
COLLAPSE! The PTB apparently intended to later push the impossible
“gravitational pancaking” ruse, even though it violates numerous laws of
Physics, and we can see the outer structure being exploded outward, by
the overpressure within. (You can compare what happens during an actual
gravitational collapse by seeing this.) The PTB clearly wanted to shove a
physically impossible, evidence-opposing destruction "mechanism" down
the throats of the masses. They know what it does to many peoples’
psyches. It induces denial, fear, schizoid behavior, and hopelessness-- all
good for the coming endless wars, and destruction of the American
Constitution. Putting out a physically impossible and evidence-opposing
“mechanism” for WTC destruction jibes with other events perpetrated by
the American regime. With the American regime’s assassination of the
Peace President, John Kennedy, the “official” scenario is that the fatal head
shot was fired from behind, even though Kennedy’s body is slammed
violently straight back--from the shot fired, from the front, by his Secret
Service “protector”/driver. The ludicrous shot from behind violates the
simple Law of Conservation of Momentum. As I have written, the WTC
bogus scenario entails “pristine pancaking”-- violating Newton’s Laws of
Motion. Similarly the JFK Assassination had (future) Senator Specter’s
“pristine bullet” that smashed into 5 bones, made turns on its own, hung out
for 2 seconds and looked virtually like new-- and violated the Momentum
Conservation Law. The PTB want to put out these impossible
“mechanisms” to dumb down, shock, or paralyze the people. Most people
go into denial, and do not want to think about it, because their
subconciousnesses know what is really involved. Those who can think and
see, and have combatted the denial, are then further confounded with other
limited hangouts put out by the Gestapo Regime’s hidden intel agents
posing as “leaders” of the “truth movement.” These WTC hangouts
included the evidence-free inanity of DEW, and the “thermite burns forever”
impossibility. Both are easily demonstrated to be physically impossible to
have caused the WTC destruction, and the CSA. All the regime’s hidden
assets earlier inserted at the top of the “alternative” or conspiracy internet
media, were then instructed to push these hangouts and avoid mention of
the nuking and the China Syndrome Aftermath.
Returning now to the fission vs. fusion issue. Blowing through the outer
structure of the building with unnecessary fusion--either as the hypothetical
pure fusion, or as a fission-fusion bomb-- could not be risked, when pure
fission micro-nukes were readily available. Fission nukes have a more
"guaranteed" upper bound on their yields, and are more dependable as
well, compared to either the alleged pure fusion or the fission-fusion bomb.
In the final analysis, the release of the tritium data may have been a clever
Intel Op to try to hide the China Syndrome Aftermath, and its nuclear
fission cause. If there was tritium at the WTC, its most likely source was
ternary fission.
posted by spooked @ 5:05 AM
35 Reasons for Many Small Fission Nukes at the

WTC
1) heat generation at ground zero for six months (china syndrome)

2) inability to quench ground zero heat with water
3) red hot/molten steel at ground zero
4) missing core columns from ground zero (vaporized during destruction)
5) spreading of sand at ground zero consistent with attempts to limit
radiation
6) washing of steel recovered from pile consistent with radiation
decontamination
7) extreme security for ground zero steel shipments consistent with limiting
access to radioactive steel
8) extreme security at ground zero, limiting exposure, view of devastation
9) extreme pulverization of WTC concrete into very fine particles
10) disappearance of over one thousand human bodies from WTC debris
11) disappearance of furniture, phones, filing cabinets and computers from
WTC debris
12) disappearance of elevator doors, office doors, office cubicle walls,
toilets and sinks from WTC debris
13) several floor fragments fused together in “meteorite” object
14) bone fragments sprayed into Bankers Trust upper floor during
destruction
15) multiple blast waves during destruction of tower
16) large fireballs during initiation of WTC1 destruction
17) small backpack-sized fission nukes exist
18) fission-nuke technology well-established
19) low efficiency of fission nukes ensures leftover radioactive fragments
and China syndrome
20) EMP formation during tower destruction (exploding cars, partial
burning)
21) Description of heat in WTC blast cloud
22) Extensive cover-up of ground zero air by EPA
23) High rate of cancers, including thyroid cancer typically associated with
radiation exposure, in ground zero responders
24) Melted, hanging skin in WTC survivor Felipe David in absence of fire
25) Vaporized press and crumpled steel door in WTC basement reported
by Pecoraro
26) Steel beam bent in U, without cracking, evidence of extreme high
temps
27) Steel beam bent in U has layer of molten metal on surface

28) Extreme overall devastation of two massive towers and blasted out
Ground Zero aftermath
29) Appearance of fantastical, nonsensical DEW theory by likely govt
agents-- uses evidence of nukes (EMP, extreme pulverization of tower into
dust) but denies nukes at all costs
30) Appearance of fantastical, nonsensical thermite (super nano-thermite)
theory by likely govt agents-- uses evidence of nukes (molten steel, china
syndrome) but denies nukes at all costs
31) Small iron microspheres found by Jones et al in WTC dust— evidence
of steel vaporization by high temps of nukes
32) Pyroclastic debris cloud during WTC destruction
33) Upwards jutting debris trails reminiscent of debris trails formed during
underground nuke test
34) Small bright flashes during destruction of both towers
35) Extremely compacted ground zero debris
Sunday, March 29, 2009
Further Observations on WTC1 Stairwell B
1. Did Pasquale Buzzelli Surf Down The “Collapse”—or Do

Conflicting Reports Collapse the O.C.T.?
2. Does the Revealed “Upward Wind” During “Collapse”

Prove the Final “Cleaner Nuke”?
Pasquale Buzzelli is a structural engineer who was working for the Port
Authority in the North Tower on 9/11. Genelle Guzman [McMillan is added
now—due to subsequent marriage] was a co-worker of Buzzelli’s at that
time. Both would be among only 20 alleged survivors of the “collapse” of
the two towers. Curiously all 20 were in the North Tower. Buzzelli would
become famous for claims that he, in effect, “surfed” down 22 floors during
“collapse” as described here.
He was found ATOP the rubble pile, and taken to safety, at least three
hours after the “collapse.” Guzman-McMillan, who started out with Buzzelli
on the 64th floor, would become famous as the last person rescued alive
from beneath the rubble, about 24 hours after the “collapse.”
However, Guzman-McMillan’s description of events leads to the collapse of

credibility of Buzzelli. As archived here, Guzman-McMillan states that she
was on the 13th—not 22nd—floor just before the “Collapse” began; and
that Buzzelli was BELOW her. She states that Buzzelli was below her as
he led a group of people (including her) down. She does not know, at that
point in time, how far below her he was. So this could be but half a flight of
stairs, or several flights. But Buzzelli, and his fellow claimants thus lose AT
LEAST nine flights of “collapse surfing” from Guzman-McMillan’s account.
Also please consider the possible implications in the differences in how
they were found. Guzman-McMillan was buried BENEATH some rubble,
while Buzzelli was ATOP the rubble pile. Curiously Guzman-McMillan also
relates pressure from the Port Authority on its reported orders to Tower
workers to stay put after the “plane hits.” The article above states, “On
instructions from the Port Authority, McMillan declines to discuss why she
stayed [initially].”
Guzman-McMillan “felt hot” while awaiting rescue. Reports from the 12

firemen who survived in Stairwell B also have them saying they felt heat in
the Stairwell even when initially climbing up. (This fits with my articles on
the early sub-basement nuke’s thermal rays that affected many people,
including Felipe David.) Indeed I might say that the following report from
Rick Cushman is the very first report of what I have lengthily described as
the China Syndrome Aftermath. See this blog: wtc-
chinasyndrome.blogspot.com. Now Rick Cushman was a marketing
manager and National Guardsman from Saugus, MA. He rushed to Ground
Zero from Massachusetts. For 12 hours he searched for survivors in the
rubble. “But he had not seen any — only pieces of bodies.
Beneath his boots, heat billowed up through the web of
steel.” Then Cushman heard Guzman-McMillan’s shouts and directed
rescuers to her.
Now this article reveals numerous things. Despite the fact that there
was likely a large number of people going down Stairwell B at the moment
of collapse— as there were only three stairwells in each tower— people
survived only at a few locations along Stairwell B. There are several
possibilities, according to my many small nukes hypothesis. As previously
hypothesized here, there could have been several failed or fizzled nukes.
Or there is the possibility, that at certain intervals, those who were in an
effective nodal region— between nukes—may have survived, at least
initially.
Now Stairwell B contained 14 survivors— including 12 firefighters— who

survived the tower’s final destruction. Two others— Buzzelli and Guzman-
McMillan— were on Stairwell B at the onset of “collapse,” but were found
elsewhere in the rubble pile. And four others were found in the
underground Mall. (This includes the two Port Authority policemen depicted
in the Oliver Stone movie.) Again it appears that the South Tower’s
“collapse” curiously did not have any such survivors. Now the New York
Magazine article indicates again that some of these Stairwell B surviving
firemen surmised that they survived a nuclear attack: “[Captain] Jonas and
his men, finally freed from their stairwell, looked around at fires and
flattened buildings. They thought they were witnessing a nuclear attack.”
My articles on the nuclear destruction of the WTC have
detailed how many firefighters surmised this. Why? Firefighters are well
familiar with heat from fire, but if they feel great heat on their skin and they
are nowhere near a fire, they know something very different is going on!
Readers of my articles, and of this blog by Spooked, and his 33 blog here
can also see the involvement of the PTB, when the article states “When
Buzzelli called at 3:30 everything changed, though not as she’d expected.
Soon, she’d know that he’d somehow landed safely in the midst of acres of
destruction, a lone soul dropped to safety on a concrete slab…”
The New York Magazine article has other quizzical matters, and should be
read in its entirety. There is the matter of the 12th Floor as depicted here.
“Jonas picked up a Mayday from the lieutenant of Ladder Five, who
reported that he was in Stairwell B on the 12th floor. Jonas had passed him
on the way down, helping a civilian. “I’m trapped and I’m hurt bad,” he said.
Jonas, who was on the fourth floor, tried to climb the stairs but couldn’t
ascend more than a floor, and in any case, as he’d later learn, the stairwell
had no 12th floor. “I’m sorry, I can’t help you,” he radioed back.”
The highest-ranking officer on Stairwell B was Chief Richard Picciotto. He

later wrote a book, as the article continues: “Picciotto’s Last Man Down
became a best-seller. It would also end his friendship with Jonas—“It’s a
very bad book,” says Jonas— and whatever camaraderie he shared that
day with the others from Ladder Six. “We don’t speak to him,” says
Komorowski. “Liar,” Butler wrote in his copy of the book.”
““It was part of my personality to take charge of a situation,” Picciotto

writes. “I’d never been the type to sit idly by while someone else called the
shots, and I wasn’t about to start now…Picciotto was the highest-ranking
guy, but he was not the commanding officer. He was doing nothing. He was
balled up in a corner,” says Jonas.”
Picciotto’s book says he was on the 7th Floor when the North Tower
“collapsed.” These articles indicate that the extant height of Stairwell B,
after tower destruction, was five flights. And this should be kept in mind
when researching where people were at the moment destruction began,
and where they ended up. It appears that each flight had two levels of
standard zigzag stairs as depicted here. We must keep in mind that
anyone being blasted on the stairwell, but remaining in the stairwell, would
have been blasted in a straight line, and shouldn’t have been blasted more
than a flight of stairs. This is different from those—like Buzzelli and
Guzman-McMillan— who were apparently blasted OUT of the stairwell, at
some point, during the tower’s destruction.
(And, of course, the stairwell above the fifth floor may have been vaporized,
or otherwise destroyed.) With Guzman-McMillan ending up buried under
some rubble, and Buzzelli atop the rubble. I also note that there appears to
be no pictures that show the very TOP of the extant five-floor Stairwell B
section. Could this be because the top contains obvious indications of the
great (nuclear) heat of tower destruction? Have these photos been
cropped, as many photos were in the Kennedy Assassination? I was the
first to note the similarity of the remnant of Stairwell B, and the remnant of
the tower from the fizzled Upshot-Knothole Ruth nuclear fission bomb test
of 3/31/53. At least the bottom third of the bomb’s tower remained because
the nuke had fizzled—it had a yield about 1/15th of what was expected.
See here:
Note the date has a 33. The tops of the Ruth test tower and Stairwell B
have some similarities as I indicated to Spooked, and as he has in his
article at his blog here on 3/12/09. The tops indicate some steel has melted
and twisted downward.
Finally, I cite the book, Report from Ground Zero: The Story of the Rescue
Efforts at the World Trade Center by Dennis Smith [not read by me]. In
particular I cite this review by Sterling D. Allan, an apparent
alternative energy expert. After reading that book, and Stairwell B’s
survivors’ accounts, Allan reveals, “a cohesive conclusion: A POWERFUL
WIND WAS GOING UP THE STAIRS AS THE BUILDING WAS
COLLAPSING DOWN. This would seem to refute the official pancake

theory of collapse in which one floor after another fails as the mass from
above comes down.”
Allan includes this familiar hypothesis, “One possible explanation for these
survivors, in the demolition model, is that explosives that were placed in
the vicinity of this stairwell section failed to go off.” Allan however appears
to only consider non-nuclear matters, but his review is dated in 2006,
before my articles, and that of others, on the nuclear destruction of the
WTC appeared.
But I conclude with the question—does the now-revealed UPWARD WIND,

of final tower destruction, indicate a nuclear blast from the ground, or
perhaps more likely from the basement? Is this upward wind another
indication of the final cleaner nuke that I have written about for several
years now? As I have written, this final cleaner nuke may also have been
seen as the so-called “nuclear glow” that TV cameras panned AWAY
FROM while purporting to show what was happening at the WTC.
So-- we have seen now that “surfing the collapse” is not as the regime
wishes to have it depicted. Many floors of “surfing” are missing, and ending
up atop the rubble— with a huge building “collapsing” on top of you— is
incredulous. Also we see that firemen’s accounts of the upward wind of
final collapse fits well with my nuclear destruction scenario, but it impossible
with the OCT, as there would be no wind until the pancaking floors hit that
level, and that would have been a downward wind.
Saturday, March 28, 2009
The Fall of the WTC1 Spire and the Intact WTC1

Stairwell: Proof of Demolition Near Bottom of the
Tower
After the destruction of WTC1, this stairwell in the core of the building
remained-- three to four stories higher than the rest of the rubble pile:
Now remember the "spire" of WTC1 that remained for a few seconds
during the destruction of the tower?
It was a good 70 stories high, and was part of the WTC1 core:
The spire didn't topple over, but fell more-or-less STRAIGHT DOWN:
IF THE SPIRE MERELY COLLAPSED, FALLING STRAIGHT DOWN, THE

HEAVY CORE COLUMNS SHOULD HAVE OBLITERATED THE
STAIRWELL AT THE BASE OF THE CORE!
Rather-- the stairwell WOULD survive if the spire was blown with bombs at
the base-- a few stories above the stairwell. In this way, the higher spire
columns could fall to the side as the base was blasted out. Perhaps several
bombs along the base of the core were used to create this result. But it
seems clear that a collapse of the spire could not result in this intact
stairwell. It also seems likely that this nuclear blasting along the
core/spire would account for all the missing WTC1 core
columns!
Also this:
The Effect of a Low Yield Nuke on a Steel Structure
The Ruth shot was a fizzle. The predicted yield

was 1.5 to 3 kt, while the 200 ton yield was a
fraction of that. Especially embarrassing to UCRL was
only the top 100 feet of the 300
that
foot shot tower was vaporized
(though much of the remainder was
scattered across the desert) . It was
standard practice at that time for each test to totally erase
all evidence associated with it (automatically "declassifying"
the site), which Ruth failed to do.
Hard to tell how tall this tower remnant is but I would guess about 100 feet,
if the cross-sections are 10 feet apart (which would fit what looks like a
ladder near the base).
Compare the above pic to this pic of the WTC1 core remnant (click to
enlarge):
Note the wilted pieces of steel dangling down.
Note-- this puts the WTC destruction into good perspective. If a 200 ton
yield nuke can vaporize 100 feet of steel structure, and destroy 100 feet or
more of it, you can imagine the yield nuke that would be required to
vaporize the innards of the 208 foot wide WTC while leaving the outer walls
more or less intact. What's not clear is if there is a linear correlation
between nuke yield and vaporization radius-- I would guess it's not
perfectly linear.
(thanks to A.P. for the find)
Thursday, October 23, 2008
A Brief Summary: WTC Destruction & High

Temperature Aftermath: ONLY Nuclear Bombs and
the China Syndrome Fit All the Evidence
NOTE: PLEASE DISSEMINATE THIS DEFINITIVE SUMMARY ON THE

NUKING OF THE WTC AS WIDELY AS POSSIBLE!
In attempting to ascertain what caused the destruction of the WTC on

9/11/01, and the great heat and molten metal observed for up to six
months afterward, one must account for ALL the phenomena involved in
WTC destruction, and the aftermath-- and not just one or two factors. Only
nuclear bombs and the resulting China Syndrome can account for ALL
phenomena observed. The overview and numerous supporting articles on
the nuclear destruction of the WTC are here:
wtcdemolition.blogspot.com But, at the outset, we should realize
that there is an abundance of evidence that the O.C.T. (Official Conspiracy
Theory) is quite bogus. For example, sworn testimony from
firemen/responders contains their witnessing of loud
explosions from the onset of tower destruction. This alone
destroys the OCT of gravity-driven, progressive collapse.
A brief summary of the nuclear aspects now follows.
1. First, low yield nukes (mini-nukes or micro-nukes) are a proven fact that
the U.S Govt has admitted to since the 1950’s with their Davey Crocket
rifle, and more recently with a physicist’s testimony to Congress.
It is also documented fact that since the 1960’s, and Project
Plowshare, low radiation nukes-- and later neutron bombs-- have been
available, and were planned for excavation projects and such. My “many
small nukes” WTC hypothesis indicates that numerous low yield nukes
went off INSIDE (near the center of) the towers. They vaporized anything
near them (via million degree temperatures and/or high neutron flux), but
the yield of these micro-nukes was deliberately small enough not to
vaporize the outer structure. This also ensured that any radiation was
contained during detonation. And Plowshare, and neutron bombs, prove
low radiation nukes have been available for decades.
2. MASSIVE EVIDENCE of ELECTROMAGNETIC PULSES (EMP) FROM

NUKES. This includes the eyewitness, sworn testimony of EMT responder,
Patricia Ondrovic (and others). She reported that as WTC1 was beginning
to be destroyed, she saw flickering lights in WTC6 lobby where she tried to
enter, but was stopped. And just outside at that time, cars caught fire
without any visible reason, and one then had its car door explode off of it;
and the door hit and injured her as she began to flee the area. Exactly how
EMP from nukes did all this is explained here, along with other evidence
of EMP during tower destruction from nuclear bombs.
3. DUST PARTICLE SIZE WAS LESS THAN 2.5 MICRONS-- & LIED
ABOUT by the Gov’t’s main OCT (Official “Collapse” Theory)
engineer/author. You can think of a mortar and pestle, and grinding
something large into smaller and smaller pieces. It takes more and more
energy input to yield smaller and smaller pieces. A nuclear bomb is known
to yield particle sizes down to 10 nanometers. (1 nanometer is 1 billionth of
a meter). And Govt scientists had equipment to analyze the WTC dust
down to 10-nanometer size, if they wanted to, and should have. Unless
they did, and have refused to release this. What they (the U.S. Geological
Survey scientists) did was lump together all dust sizes less than 2.5
microns and released this data. (A micron is 1 millionth of a meter, and a
thousand times larger than 1 nanometer). Nonetheless, the Govt’s main
engineer/author, Z.P. Bazant, numerous times wrote papers that claimed
that 10 microns was the smallest sized particles created during WTC
destruction, and later collected by USGS scientists. For years he did not
cite the work that showed, this. Last year he did cite a reference, and it led
back to the 2.5 micron study, NOT to the 10 microns he claimed as the
smallest dust particle size! So he flat out committed fraud here. He had to
do this as his bogus papers claim that the gravitational potential energy
(height times weight) of the towers accounted for the energy needed to
create the smallest dust particle size. And there isn’t enough energy from
his theory to account for 2.5 micron size dust, let alone the much smaller
dust sizes that the USGS did not ascertain or release! The bogus physics
and math from Bazant and others is here.
4. MELTED, HANGING SKIN WITHOUT FIRE was reported by at least 4

known WTC survivors. This includes WTC worker Felipe David,
whose own words state this occurred without fire, but his story when told
by another, has “fire” added. There are also two women who
reported (on the “Larry King Show”) that a similar thing
happened to them, and they don’t know why, because they too were
not in any fire. And there is also a security guard with a similar report. The
security guard and Felipe David had this happen to them in the lobby and
the sub-basement area of WTC1 respectively. Outside the towers,
firemen/responders also felt great heat on their skin without
being near any fire DURING TOWER DESTRUCTION. Only the
thermal rays of a nuclear bomb can account for this. They go out the
farthest when a nuke goes off. And hanging skin was a common
occurrence in Hiroshima survivors. Note that the outside firemen feeling
heat on their skin (without fire near them) also disproves “DEW”, as they
are NOT in the towers nor right under them either, and thus if “directed
energy beams did it”, and these must be coherent, they would not diverge
and cause heat far from their target! So no “DEW” was involved.
5. SUB-BASEMENT LEVEL, 50-TON STEEL PRESS & HEAVY DOOR

VAPORIZED. At the same time as Felipe David’s nightmare was unfolding,
and also in the sub-basement, WTC engineer Mike Pecoraro
reports going up a level and seeing that a sub-basement
level was in shambles and was “just gone.” Also he states a 50-
ton press has also been apparently vaporized, and a 300 pound
steel/concrete door has just been left shriveled up like foil. The only things
that could do this are the multi-million degree temperatures, and neutron
bombardment, from a nuclear bomb. Coupling this with the four survivors
who had melted, hanging skin at this same time, we have evidence of
blast, high temperatures, neutron bombardment and thermal rays-- all
virtual proof of nuclear bomb use.
6. HEAT GENERATION AT THE WTC FOR UP TO 6 MONTHS AFTER

9/11- -THE CHINA SYNDROME AFTERMATH (CSA) (see http://wtc-
chinasyndrome.blogspot.com) No heat “lingers” for weeks and
months, not alleged jet fuel, not alleged thermite (which would have been
used up either in minutes or hours--or during its use as an explosive). We
have the documented, witnessed, and well photographed and
videotaped great heat and molten metal for weeks, and
indeed for up to six months underground at the WTC-- until all
radioactive fission fragments were carted away. No heat lingers for that
long; this could only have been heat GENERATION. The evidence of great
heat throughout much of the rubble pile and even higher temperatures
underneath the two towers and WTC7 is massive. It included melted
firemen’s boots, even dogs had to wear special boots, a mass of

congealed bullets in WTC6 going off weeks later from heat, and many
photos of steam emanation from the continual water hosing of the
“hotspots” all around the WTC. The China Syndrome HAD TO ARISE
because each of the numerous small nukes used up only 1-6% of its fissile
material-- which is standard for nukes. The remainder was then available
as radioactive fragments, releasing great heat for a long time (until
removed), as the half-life of Uranium 235 is 700 million years. And it is
likely that there were numerous, redundant nukes employed, and the
phenomena of "fratricided" and fizzled nukes may also have
occurred as these are common with nuclear detonations.
These effects likely further exacerbated the China Syndrome. The
radioactive fragments were somewhat dispersed throughout the rubble pile,
and in greatest concentration underneath the towers and WTC7-- where
water and sand treatments could not readily be employed. Note that the
alleged Tritium finding that the Govt released, may be a red herring to fool
people to look for top-secret unknown types of nukes, which couldn’t have
led to the CSA, which is what clearly occurred. The ludicrous lying (“there
never was any heat during or after WTC destruction”) or the poor attempts
to create new laws of chemistry and physics by alleged 9/11truthers
(“super nanocomposite thermite burns forever”) only shows how desperate
the Govt is to hide the China Syndrome Aftermath.
7. THE MISSING PEOPLE, FURNITURE, steel & other contents of the

towers. Destruction of the towers vaporized many of the nearly 3,000
people who died, as well as much furniture, steel and other building
contents. The medical examiner was unable to find or utilize
any strands of DNA for over 1100 people. The rubble pile from the
two towers was only a couple of stories high when it should have been
several times higher from a “collapse,” or even a conventional demolition.
There is much missing mass from the “extraordinarily high temperatures” as
fire engineering Professor Barnett declared after examining vaporized steel,
that occurred during tower/WTC7 destruction. Nukes vaporize matter near
their hypocenter. Thermite, thermobarics, etc. DO NOT. Contrary to what
some claim, neither thermite nor thermobarics could vaporize the missing
people, furniture, steel and other contents, as detailed here.
8. CLASSICAL GOV’T DISINFO METHODS ENSUED whereby their

agents put out supposedly “alternative theories” involving alleged “secret,
new technologies” that are either evidence-free and/or impossible. Space
Beams/DEW (Directed Energy Weapons), or ludicrous “super
nanocomposite thermite burns forever” theories were created by
the intel agencies to cover up the nuking of the WTC, and the China
Syndrome Aftermath. (Thermite cools off in minutes or hours.) These
“theories” desperately try to claim new phenomena or new laws of physics
and chemistry--as does the 9/11 Commission’s ludicrous “findings.”
9. More now on the issue of Radiation: The #1 item above showed that the
Govt has had mini-nukes, and micro-nukes for decades, and that low-
radiation yielding nukes have also been around for decades as well. On
the other hand, the great heat and molten metal at, and under,
the WTC for up to six months after 9/11, indicates the existence
of the China Syndrome Aftermath at the WTC; whereby many responders
and Metro New York residents may have been exposed to some radiation
from radioactive fission fragments that resulted from the use of the many
micro-nukes. We have much indirect evidence of the effects of radiation
poisoning among the 40,000 responders who were at “Ground Zero” in the
weeks and months afterwards. There have been hundreds of
reported cases of blood, lymph and thyroid cancers among
responders. These types of cancers frequently arise from radiation
exposure, and are much less likely (unlike lung diseases) to arise from
inhalation of toxins. Also, the teeth and hair falling out reported
by several responders are also standard illnesses from
radiation poisoning. These responders’ doctors and lawyers are not
telling these people that radiation may have caused their illnesses,
because the China Syndrome Aftermath remains one of the Govt’s most
closely guarded secrets. However, we can see that the Govt itself was well
aware of what it had caused! Standard radiation-lowering methods were
employed beginning the very next morning-- 9/12/01! These included
water dilution/hosing down and sand/earth covering (and
subsequent removal of this sand/earth) of the rubble pile.
These procedures continued for weeks and months precisely because the
rubble pile, and undergound areas, were replete with radioactive fission
fragments.
There is some general information on radiation sources that needs

elucidation. Due to absorption and other factors, radiation levels can go
down quickly-- unless radioactive fragments (radionuclides) are released to
the environment. Unless one is close (like Felipe David, who appears to
have received thermal radiation, and not ionizing radiation)-- or the
radiation is very intense-- enough distance/air or most materials, will stop
most forms of radiation. This assumes one does not inhale or ingest
radioactive particles or radionuclides. The underground WTC areas-- which
likely had the highest radiation yields (and also heat)-- were off limits to all
but a few responders. Also, as Hiroshima studies indicated, it
took decades for many cancers and other illnesses to
manifest. Note that a Gov’t agency, FEMA, was/is in charge of any
radiation data for Ground Zero, and could easily have blocked release of
any data that found radiation. The U.S. Gov’t has a long, sordid
record of lying about radiation exposure to soldiers and
citizens, as noted here when they nuked their own soldiers
during “atomic tests”.
Honest people, not in DENIAL, must see the analogy to the Reichstag fire
set by the German Nazis, in 1933, in Berlin. This was their seat of almost
their entire federal gov’t. And this fire/destruction was used as an excuse to
destroy their Constitution, and as an excuse for War on “terrorists,” and
then all of Europe. There was one difference with the Nazis, however. They
waited till the middle of the night, when there were no inhabitants in the
Reichstag building! Of course, that German Gov’t did not admit they did it
themselves, but that came out after they lost WWII. If U.S. Govt agencies
have certain types of proof that they nuked the WTC, and thus its largest
city; does any honest person think these Govt agencies would ever release
this data--unless a new Gov’t came about? There is reason to believe that
other crucial data such as WTC rubble pile temperature (AVIRIS, 2nd set),
and WTC destruction seismic recordings were altered. This physicist
hypothesizes that WTC responders AND nearby Metro New York residents
and workers, that were exposed either the longest or to certain areas with
the “hottest”spots face the risk of getting cancer and other immune
disorders from radiation exposure in the years and decades to come. Sadly
this will prove the China Syndrome Aftermath in the worst possible way.
Private persons and institutions are urged to get and keep statistics on this,
as the Gov’t will likely cover this up.
Eyewitness Testimony of Firefighters Believing

They Were Nuked on 9/11
... as well as early WTC7 Destruction, EMP, non-impact

plane flyby, and people being pushed out of a WTC tower.
By The Anonymous Physicist
Reading just a handful out of the 503 9/11

WTC initial responders’ testimonies has
proven to be a real eye-opener. These
firefighters’ and EMS officers’ depositions
provide good corroboration for many of the
things I have hypothesized at this blog,
including the following: The WTC was
demolished via small nuclear bombs, that
pre-“collapse” basement nukes were set off
in the towers, synchronous with the “plane
hit” explosions above, that there likely were
EMP’s (Electromagnetic Pulses from nukes),
and that WTC7 underwent early explosions,
and attempted early demolition.
Firefighter Edward Kennedy here states that he thought a “nuclear bomb”

had demolished a tower. “We were on Liberty Street and we came out into
there and it just look like something that -- it looked like a bomb, of course,
had gone off, almost like a nuclear bomb... “
Here we learn that NYFD Lt. George DeSimone similarly thought the heat-
-without fire--impinging on him was Hiroshima-like:
“I thought it was some kind of thermal explosion where I'm

either going to get burnt -- and I had kind of ideas that it
was going to be something like Hiroshima where all this
heat was coming at me and we were going to get burnt…”
Several hours after both tower “collapses”, and despite official regime
claims of total military and civilian flight termination, he said:
"...We saw jets overhead, commercial airliner, military jets,

Air Force jets, and we didn't know what the hell was going
on..."
Recall I have detailed how a nuke’s thermal rays go farthest out, well
beyond its destructive blast radius. Here NYFD Chief Jerry Gumbo’s
testimony is one of several I have cited, to say he felt heat far away from
any actual fire. He stated:
"...At the time of the impact, we were able to feel heat that
was generated from the explosion at the command post,
which was across West Street, and West is fairly large
street with that island in there, and debris was showering all
over West Street."
I believe this is again indication of the early basement nuke concomitant

with the “plane hit” explosion above.
Another firefighter who thought the WTC destruction was nuclear is NYFD
Lt Richard Smiouskas, whose statement is here. He was an official NYFD
photographer, and has some startling testimony, regarding other matters,
as well. It appears that with his telefoto lens, he witnessed people being
pushed out of tower one. He said:
"...I was photographing the fire from the roof. I had a long
lens on the camera, and I had people in the windows. It
looked like they were being -- they weren't actually jumping.
One or two people I saw, they seemed like they were being
forced out by the people behind them. There was half a
dozen faces. In between the smoke you could see people..."

(snip) "I guess they were all trying to get air, and this guy
was actually standing in the window, standing in the frame
with each hand on each frame and he kind of like got
nudged out."
In the second sentence, it looks like he just stopped himself from saying
“pushed”. The last incident may even indicate the NON-jumper was trying
to keep himself from being pushed out!
Lt. Smiouskas believed that a nuclear bomb went off, due to the magnitude
of Earth shaking that he felt. As a tower is being destroyed he recalls:
"It looked like an earthquake. The ground was shaking. I fell

to the floor. My camera bag opened up. The cameras went
skidding across the floor…I'm thinking maybe a bomb blew
up. I'm thinking it could have been a nuclear….”
Then he writes of seeing “glitter” through the black smoke, during tower
destruction.
“Everybody started running north, and this huge volume like

ten stories high billowing, pushing black smoke and like a
glitter. I guess it was glass that was glitter that was in the
cloud of smoke.”
I do not believe this “glitter” was glass in the black smoke. Perhaps it is
more likely that gamma rays from nuclear explosions which could readily
traverse the black smoke, impinged on his retina. This is like the atronauts
in earth orbit seeing (retinal) flashes from cosmic rays when they tried to go
to a higher earth orbit, and like medical x-rays that go through you and
onto a photographic plate.
But note how Lt. Smiouskas found the ground shaking was intense enough
that he surmised (correctly, IMO) that a nuclear bomb went off. Now, I have
been in 5.1 (Richter scale) Earthquakes, and in 2.3’s. The latter I didn’t feel
at all, and the 5.1 sounds more like what Lt. Smiouskas (and I)
experienced—at least a likely 4.0. I also was at the WTC six weeks after
9/11, and saw many cracked, concrete sidewalks, blocks away from the
WTC, (as well as experienced my eyes burning from the hot toxic gases still
emitted.) I therefore make the following assertion. It is likely that the
“official” 2.1 and 2.3 Richter scale recordings on 9/11 had their spikes cut
off! I have even found that NIST asked for a “re-analysis” of seismic data
from one observatory before publishing their “findings.” So, just as I
hypothesized about the long-delayed second AVIRIS (WTC temperature)
data set, the seismic recordings were likely doctored by this regime. And
this fire-fighter’s belief that the intense ground shaking was due to a
“nuclear bomb” supports this hypothesis.
The interview of Dr. Michael Guttenberg, of NYFD’s Office of Medical

Affairs, who may have witnessed EMP is here.
Just after the second “plane hit” explosion, and before any tower
“collapse”, he noted:
“…on the EMS radio, there was absolute silence for

probably 10 or 15 seconds, you know, which to me, it
seemed like 10 to 15 seconds, but it was absolute radio
silence for a few seconds…”
Questioner:
“We were told that the air was so thick with debris that radio
waves weren't able to travel.”
M.G.:
“That was after the towers came down.”
Note two things, the radios went dead—likely a sign of EMP, as I have
previously described. And see how the questioner attempts to confuse the
issue with a double lie. One, that this happened after a tower was
destroyed, when instead, this is after the second WTC2 “plane hit”
explosion, and before any tower “collapse” as Dr. Guttenberg corrects him.
And two, that radio waves would have been blocked by a conventional
explosion, when they wouldn’t have been. And note also that this radio
blackout occurred after the second “plane hit” explosion. My previous
articles contained evidence, and my hypothesis, that the WTC1 “plane hit”
explosion was used as cover for a nearly concomitant basement nuclear
bomb explosion that vaporized a 50 ton steel press, and a garage level,
and also caused phone outage. So we learn now that electronic
communications also were affected after the second “plane hit”, which may
indicates that they also nuked the basement of WTC2 at that time. I
hypothesized that this was done in case the planned, subsequent, intricate,
top-down demolition failed.
Guttenberg also provides more eyewitness testimony for early WTC7

explosions, as he went to the loading area of WTC7.
“…We all stuffed ourselves into this hallway [near the

loading dock of WTC7], pulled the door shut, and the noise
just got very loud and the room filled with dust. The noise
stopped, and we opened up the door, and everything was
pitch black. The way we got into the loading dock was not
the way we were getting out. It was obstructed.”
This appears to be a watered down way of saying WTC underwent internal

explosions. This jives with my earlier article citing Deputy Director of the
NYC Emergency Services Dept., Barry Jennings, that the WTC7 underwent
attempted complete internal destruction at the same time that the first tower
(and WTC 3, 4, 5, 6) were demolished. My article, on top here
hypothesized that fizzled nukes was the reason WTC7 was not successfully
destroyed during this early coordinated attempt, which Jennings stated
destroyed much of the lobby, now corroborated by Guttenberg. The last
URL also has my earlier articles on nuclear demolition of the WTC.
NYFD Lt. Robert Larocco here also noted that tower destruction seemed
“nuclear” to him. He said,
“Of course the cloud was kind of like a nuclear winter thing.
You're walking through fallout.”
Near the towers, but BEFORE either tower “collapse”, he noted:
“As I started walking onto the side street – actually as I

stepped onto the side street, the strangest thing I noticed
was there was like three inches of snow on the ground. The
snow was probably pulverized concrete, sheetrock, loose
tiles, insulation, asbestos or what-have-you.”
Now this fine ash or 3 inches of snow-like “pulverized concrete” as he

called it would not occur from a “plane hit” or conventional explosives.
Could this fine, 3 inches of “snow” be from the early basement nukes I
have written about? Like the WTC1 basement blast that vaporized a steel
press, and a parking garage level that eyewitnesses said was just “gone.”
Now some DEW/OCT disinfo agents claim that the tower destruction was
not loud because their hangout was not loud. During the commencement of
WTC2 destruction, Lt. Larocco stated:
“The next second I heard that loudest noise in the world that
I was describing before getting louder and louder.” (snip) “It
was the loudest noise I've ever heard in my life. It was in
both ears. Kind of like those rockets that they launch the
space shuttles with, it was like I had one going off in each
ear. When I thought it was the loudest noise I ever heard,
every second it was just increasing getting louder and louder
and louder.”
Lt Larocco also describes very personal feelings of fear of death, and

fellow firefighters “crying like babies” during and just after collapse. These
revelations prove that the redactions in the published
responders’ statements were not because of wanting to hide
the most personal of feelings.
Lt. Larocco also stated that hours after both towers were destroyed:
“…I still really didn't believe that the second tower was hit by
a second plane.”
At this point, the interviewer, Monte Feiler, says, “Stopping the interview at
1306.” Then, “Resuming the tape at 1308 hours. Same people present.”
Now Lt. Larocco says: “
Like I said, the rumors were flying around, and they turned
out to be quite factual, about the second tower getting hit.
Although at the time I really didn't believe it until I saw it later
on television. The thing about the Pentagon, the plane
crashing out in Pennsylvania, it was all coming into the
picture that this is something major going on.”
So we see how something happened during this “time out.” Something he

was told and recalling what was “on TV” apparently made him change his
mind and believe in the second “plane hit.” This manipulation speaks for
itself. And if there really were plane hits, would the PTB need to perform
such blatent manipulations of eyewitness testimony?
Finally I note that when he was making his way out after “collapse,” Lt.
Larocco recalls:
“I thought to myself this is a locked exit. That's illegal.”
We see, as some survivors have noted, many fire escape exits were
locked. Someone--who may have had a master key--apparently locked
numerous exits. If such a man is ascertained, and his actions proven to be
deliberate, he should be charged with mass murder.
My interpretation of EMT Frank Puma’s deposition here indicates that he

may have witnessed a FLYBY, and not a “plane impact” regarding the
alleged “second hit.” He said:
“…I ran down to the corner of Church and Park Place,

looked up and I saw the plane shooting out of the top of the
towers. That's when I grabbed for my radio and yelled over
the air, "1 Adam. A bomb just went off in the Trade
Center."...
Note that after he witnessed an apparent flyby, HE CALLED IN A BOMB,

and NOT a plane impact! In fact, when you couple his statement to the
interviewer, with his action of exactly what he called in, it seems clear that
he believed the plane he saw bombed the WTC! And this must be
considered a possibility. However, all the evidence and the ludicrous
“plane-shaped” hole itself indicate shape charges, at that facade, were set
off in sync with a flyby (and basement nukes).
Finally, for those who grasp the deeper conspiracies I have elucidated
here, I note that Firefighter Michael Wernick here stated the number of
the Fire Engine that apparently responded first to the WTC, on 9/11.
Wernick said, “Engine 33 went first.” As I have written here before,
“All things nuclear…”
The Crucial Differences in the Nuclear 9/11

Theories
A Call To Eliminate Nuclear 9/11 Mis- or Dis-Information &

Attain Completeness and Fit all the Known Evidence
Several, differing WTC nuclear destruction scenarios have been put forth
by their respective authors. While they all have nuclear explosions in
common; they have key differences. These differences must be openly
examined, and used to strive towards a final nuclear 911 WTC destruction
scenario that fits all the evidence, and is not contraindicated by the Laws of
Physics. Nuclear WTC scenarios that do not fit all the evidence, or contain
false statements, or are contradicted by physical law need to be
abandoned.
1. Within a year or two of 9/11/01 people began to post at physics forums

that WTC destruction seemed to involve nuclear bombs.
2. By 2005, the first website appeared which contained a

nuclear WTC destruction scenario by an Anonymous Finnish
Military Expert. He hypothesized that one upwardly-focused, sub-
basement shape-charge-like nuke was used to destroy each tower. Tower
destruction, he stated, was likely done with the aid of conventional
explosives as needed. The Finn also hypothesized that the single nuke
was a fourth generation, fission-free thermonuclear (pure fusion) device.
He cited the alleged Tritium finding by U.S. Gov’t scientists. Therefore
(fusion only), there could be no China Syndrome Aftermath with this theory.
3. In 2006, William Tahil wrote a book and offered it for sale

online. (It is now downloadable for free.) Tahil also claimed that one deep
underground nuclear explosion per tower occurred, but that they weren’t
bombs per se. Rather, he claims, there were two huge, underground,
fission nuclear reactors already present, which were made to go
supercritical, and explode in a nuclear fashion. Tahil wrote that a China
Syndrome Aftermath resulted.
4. In 2007, this Anonymous [American] Physicist offered a

detailed, nuclear WTC destruction scenario. Many small nukes
were said to have been employed during tower destruction, but some
conventional explosives may also have been used to allow the nukes to be
small, and not vaporize the outer tower structure. After first incorporating all
the “official” evidence, that included findings that supported both fission
and fusion; he [I] first wrote that either fission-initiated fusion bombs or
tritium-boosted fission bombs were used.
But after finding massive, irrefutable evidence of the China

Syndrome Aftermath at the WTC for up to six months-- until the
fissioning, radioactive fragments were carted away-- and noting that the
China Syndrome can supposedly only occur from fissioning remnants, not
fusion components, the Anonymous Physicist has stated the following. The
alleged Tritium data release to the public may be a clever regime ploy (red
herring) to get people to look for the mythical fourth generation nuke
precisely because it is fission-free, and therefore you couldn’t have WHAT
WE DID HAVE-- THE CHINA SYNDROME AFTERMATH at the
WTC. Since the evidence of the China Syndrome of a massive heat-

generating source existed at the WTC for months afterwards, and only
fission fragments could cause this heat GENERATION for so long, the
bombs likely were fission bombs. The Govt then deliberately released
bogus information (Tritium), as covering up the China Syndrome Aftermath
was their most crucial Op-Plan after 9/11. The China Syndrome arose, and
HAD TO ARISE perforce, because a fission nuke uses only 1-6% of its
fissile material. The remainder is left over and will remain fissioning for a
long time, as the half-life of Uranium 235 is 700 million years. Also the
concepts of redundant nukes, "fratricided" nukes, and fizzled nukes were
detailed in my papers, and all lead to a China Syndrome Aftermath.
Furthermore, the massive disinfo efforts by the American regime, and its
agents, make clear how important it was/is to cover up the nuking, and the
China Syndrome Aftermath in NEW YORK CITY. As usual, disinfo agents
try too hard. Their M.O. is often clear to see. The hangouts known as the
Official Conspiracy Theory (OCT), and “DEW” blatantly lie that there was
no heat during or after WTC destruction. And another hangout (thermite)
has its proponent admit to the great heat for months, but must lie and claim
that “thermite burns forever,” when it actually cools off in minutes or hours.
The final step, in the intel agencies’ disinformation scheme--as more and
more people see the truth of the nuclear destruction of the WTC, and the
China Syndrome Aftermath-- is to plant individuals (mostly online
personalities) who will pretend to be pro-nuclear 9/11. All the while
everything they write is meant to confuse, confound, and actually belittle
the nuclear 9/11 hypothesis with ludicrous or irrelevant claims. They will be
easy to spot; they will likely never cite my research and articles on the
nuclear destruction of the WTC, and the China Syndrome Aftermath. They
will cite the other theories above-- but not mine-- precisely because of the
unchanging flaws in the others, as detailed above. So please be aware of
new, allegedly nuclear 9/11 proponents who may actually try to confound
the issue; and present mis-, or dis-information, or irrelevancies, or pretend
it is unknowable, or doesn’t matter.
Let us now examine the first two detailed nuclear WTC destruction
scenarios listed above. First, let us look at the Finnish military expert’s
claims of one sub-basement, pure fusion, shape-charged-like, upwardly
focused nuke per tower. This appears to be erroneous in several ways.
First the observed, top-down, destruction mechanism, and the earlier,
highly likely nuclear sub-basement explosion (see more below) both belie
the one nuke per tower hypothesis. The Finn has stated that he is an
expert on shape charges, and that the top/down scenario could have been
done via nuclear shape charges in the sub-basement. But the website that
has his articles says that his translator refused to translate his details of
how this could have occurred. But even if theoretically possible, the details
of the early likely nuclear, sub-basement explosion (see below)
demonstrate that his one nuke per tower scenario is untenable. Likewise,
this Anonymous Physicist, has proposed that the hunt for the pure fusion,
4th generation nuke is likely a deliberate, planted red herring precisely
because this would obviate what did take place-- the China Syndrome
Aftermath. So I contend that the Finnish Military Expert’s hypotheses of 1.
Pure fusion nuke, 2. One nuke per tower in the basement are incorrect.
The Finn also says that “red mercury” could be one way to attain fusion
without prerequisite fission. This is the “red mercury” scam, that I have
shown here is physically impossible to cause fusion; and is a British
American Regime Psyops. The Finn was given my critique of his
hypotheses, by the owner of the site that has his nuclear scenario. There
has been no word back from him to my knowledge, but I would still
welcome this now.
Next I have written what may be the only full review of Tahil’s book here.
And this should be read by all, after reading his book. Tahil deserves credit
for analyzing the USGS dust/elements study, and concluding that fission
likely occurred during the WTC destruction, and even afterwards with
secondary fission on some of the samples. But then Tahil’s scenario entails
one nuke per tower in the sub-basement again-- but here each one was a
fission explosion that arose from making a large, hidden fission reactor
explode like a nuclear bomb with upward focusing (as with the Finn). My
review makes clear that several aspects are untenable or improbable. First,
a nuclear reactor “going super-critical,” and exploding like a nuclear bomb
is said to be physically impossible. Then the videoed, top-bottom tower
destruction itself makes the one nuke per basement unlikely. Furthermore,
my articles have also cited much eyewitness testimony such as from
survivor sub-basement nuke survivor, Felipe David, and WTC
Engineer Mike Pecoraro. Pecoraro was in a sub-basement level, and
went UP a level to see that an earlier blast vaporized a 50 ton steel press
and shriveled up a heavy concrete/steel door into foil-like matter. This
implies a nuke went off above him, not below him, and so even if a fission
reactor could be made to go off like a nuclear bomb (which is stated to be
impossible), could the one reactor do this a second time after it would have
had its first, chaotic nuclear explosion? So the actual destruction videos
and eyewitness testimony further erode some of Tahil’s (and the Finn’s)
hypotheses.
Finally, numerous crucial statements Tahil wrote are incorrect. His rationale
for the massive hidden reactor hypothesis was two-fold. 1. He claims that a
fission bomb uses up 100% of its fissile material, when the correct figure is
only 1-6%! and 2. Massive amounts of Strontium and other elements found
in the dust, he claims, could only mean that two massive fission reactors
were already present. My review showed that Strontium occurs in concrete,
sometimes not as a tiny component, but as a relatively large percentage, as
is known for the concrete used in making the Empire State Building and the
Pentagon. All this taken together make his two hidden, massive, reactors
hypothesis either physically impossible (to go off as a bomb and/or to
subsequently be re-used), unnecessary, or untenable. But again his work is
most valuable for demonstrating the likelihood that fission occurred during
WTC destruction, and that the China Syndrome resulted. I have had no
communications from Tahil after my review and critique of his hypotheses.
But I continue to welcome honest criticism of both my critiques of the other
nuclear scenarios, and of my own hypotheses.
It is hoped that people will examine all the evidence (including survivors’
testimonies, EMP, massive heat, sound, radiation lowering methods used,
photos, etc.), and the Physics I have outlined, and that are archived at
these two blogs, http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com and
http://wtc-chinasyndrome.blogspot.com, and stop promoting
misinformation or disinformation. I assert this includes the “red mercury”
scam, the tritium red herring, and the latter’s implied fission-free pure
fusion hangout as well as seeing how massive hidden underground
reactors going off as nuclear bombs are improbable if not impossible-- and
don’t fit the destruction evidence, and eyewitness testimony. They are not
needed when you learn the aspects of my “many small nukes” hypothesis.
If you are truly interested in what was perpetrated on 9/11, please read the
ENTIRETY of the two blogs that contain my archived nuclear 9/11 articles,
and make up your own mind. And if you want to see just how the Official
Regime “explanation” for what occurred at the WTC on 9/11/01, (and some
of the “alternative” non-nuclear theories) used bogus science and
committed outright fraud, there are more articles on this at this site.
To sum up, all the evidence of the actual WTC destruction, and the great
heat generated there for up to six months indicates that WTC destruction
was most likely caused by numerous small nuclear fission bombs (micro-
nukes), not by a single basement nuke, nor by massive hidden reactors
that exploded like nuclear bombs. The China Syndrome Aftermath arose,
and had to arise, because the fission fragments were contained in the
buildings as they were nuked, and ended up all over the rubble pile, and
beneath the towers and WTC7.
It’s time to promote, or at least publicly discuss, the continual efforts made
by this Anonymous [American] Physicist to examine all the evidence of the
nuking of the WTC, and the China Syndrome Aftermath in New York City.
Please promote these works both on the net and to friends, family, and
neighbors. It is ABSOLUTELY THE MOST CRUCIAL ASPECT OF 911
TRUTH, TO INFORM PEOPLE THAT THE AMERICAN REGIME NUKED
ITS OWN MOST POPULOUS CITY, NYC, ON 9/11. If your favorite blog or
website ignores-- or blocks-- this most crucial aspect, either post it yourself
or tell all your friends, family, etc. And carefully examine the differences in
the nuclear 911 hypotheses, and eliminate the impossible, the improbable,
the untenable, or what the evidence indicated is incorrect; and promote
what fits all the evidence, and is physically tenable-- many small fission
nukes were used to destroy the WTC on 9/11/01, and the China Syndrome
Aftermath resulted. And the radiation issue is also discussed here.
Please promote this, as there isn’t much time left before they pull away the
wool from everyone’s eyes. It won’t be pleasant, and must be prevented.
Life will not be worth living then. Remember Hiroshima. The survivors there
were said to be envious of the dead. This may be what they have planned
for all of us, with the American Regime being, as Rev. Martin Luther King
said, “the greatest purveyor of evil in the world today.” Indeed, there is
much evidence that the American regime nuked its own people at least
once before 9/11/01, in the Port Chicago, California incident, as I detailed
here. Thus the American regime remains the only regime that has nuked
its own people, as well as others, and that fact would likely enrage the
American people to act, as nothing else might.
Tuesday, September 09, 2008
Micro-Nukes in the WTC--Creating The China

Syndrome: Important Matters of Completeness &
Plausibility
My “Many Nukes” Hypothesis for the destruction of the WTC on 9/11,

perpetrated by the American regime, is detailed here
wtcdemolition.blogspot.com. How this led to the China Syndrome is
detailed here wtc-chinasyndrome.blogspot.com.
To summarize these matters now, I have written how the towers’

destruction entailed numerous micro-nukes detonating in each tower, and
furthermore much redundancy was employed to insure that sufficient
numbers of these low-yield devices successfully went off as planned. Some
of the redundant micro-nukes were impacted by the exploding micro-
nukes, which allowed for the redundant ones’ fissile material to give rise to
the China Syndrome. I also explained how some micro-nukes fizzled for
various reasons--part of the reason for having so many redundant micro-
nukes present. I listed several factors that could have caused this fizzling,
even hypothesizing that the early explosions in the WTC7 were
fizzled nukes, that were meant to destroy WTC7 but they did not properly
go critical.
The reader can read how standard some of these concepts are in the
nuclear world. The military and “policy” makers use the term “fratricide” for
the occurrence of one nuclear warhead impacting/adversely affecting
another one and preventing the latter from going nuclear. Read here, for
example. Under the heading of “Nuclear targeting and fratricide,” you will
find this: “Historically, analysts have assumed that only 2 nuclear warheads
could be used in a short time frame against any target because of a
problem called “fratricide.” Assigning multiple warheads to a target requires
precise timing to prevent one incoming warhead from destroying others.

Furthermore, a nuclear detonation near ground level (which is ideal for
destroying hardened silos) would create a debris cloud that could destroy
other warheads heading to the same target.”
Furthermore, long term storage of nuclear bombs or warheads involves

another form of fratricide. This article on the many problems of long-term
nuclear warhead storage, describes how nuclear warheads have
“vulnerability to fratricide neutrons,” as well as being susceptible to many
other problems that could make them fizzle. So you can see that I was
correct in writing that impacted and/or fizzled nukes, are problems that
could be expected to occur when you have a complicated scenario
involving many small nukes going off in a relatively small place-- especially
in an enclosed space. And these matters thus could easily explain where
the available fissile material to cause the China Syndrome at the WTC
came from.
Now knowing of these potentially, fratricidal effects on the nukes to be

used in the WTC on 9/11, the American perps-- foul physicists, and
monstrous military men, much like those involved in nuking their own at
Port Chicago, and other innocent humans at Hiroshima and Nagasaki-- did
the following. 1. Emplaced many redundant nukes, in each WTC building,
and at each level to be nuked. The levels where the nukes were emplaced
took fratricidal effects into account, as much as possible. 2. Used
(somewhat hardened) sensors that would trigger (sequentially, as needed)
redundant nukes at each level that they were to be set off at. 3. Used
sensors that themselves would be vaporized, if the first, planned nuke went
off properly, so that the redundant ones would not go nuclear. Of course,
their fissile material would then be available for the China Syndrome
Aftermath. Did all this go off exactly as planned? No. As I have written,
the hidden, denied, early WTC7 explosions indicate that the perps failed to
properly set off the nukes in WTC7, and took five or more hours to re-do it,
later in the afternoon. One possible scenario for the failed, early nuking of
WTC7 could be the following. The early nukes in the lobby and basement
fizzled (due to fratricidal or other effects). That is, they exploded but either
did not attain any criticality (only conventional explosions worked), or else
the fissile material had been “weakened” and the resultant nuclear
explosion was too small for demolition of WTC7 to occur. The sensor(s)
were themselves damaged (from partial explosions), and did not then
trigger redundant nukes to go off, or else all redundant nukes fizzled, as
Jennings (in the last article) describes several WTC7 explosions.
However even a properly functioning nuclear device going off inside a

building can lead to its own China Syndrome, as follows. Let us look at the
efficiency of nuclear devices historically, as I do not have access to data on
the efficiency of the most current nukes. But it would likely be in the same
range. The efficiency of a nuclear bomb is the percentage of its total
available fissile material (such as Uranium-235 or Plutonium-239) that
actually undergoes fission during the criticality stage of
implosion/explosion-- roughly one microsecond. The remainder is still
highly radioactive and could give rise to a China Syndrome under certain
conditions. Peter Vogel’s book, “The Last Wave From Port
Chicago" describes on page 13-13 how the Hiroshima “A-Bomb” used
only 1.14% of its contained fissile material. The Port Chicago type A-Bomb
had even less efficiency-- about 0.5%. More recently, 6% efficiency for
updated nuclear bombs is cited here. Such a low efficiency is due to the
immense difficulty of having an implosion, and then an explosion, whereby
the fissile material has only one microsecond before the imploding,
fissioning U-235 critical mass with its tremendous number of released
neutrons and subsequent energy release (and great heat and pressure),
forces the critical mass to explode outward thus terminating its criticality
geometry.
What this means is that even a properly functioning, fission bomb will have
94-99% of its highly radioactive, fissile material released into the
environment where it will more slowly continue to fission and decay-- and
release great heat. Now if a nuclear bomb goes off several thousand feet in
the air, a la Hiroshima, the unfissioned U-235 will be widely dispersed and
will come down over a huge area. (The heat of the Bomb would even have
vaporized the unfissioned U-235, but this will later condense and come
down somewhere.) But the micro-nukes--even the properly fissioning ones
used inside the WTC-- were, at least partially, contained during the
destruction. But as the buildings were being destroyed, even vaporized, the
remaining fissile material would be able to reach all around the WTC area,
and some would likely reach significantly beyond as well. Some fissile
material from the sub-basement nukes, would likely be trapped in the
largest concentrations, to be found in the aftermath, in these basement
areas. These radioactive fragments would also be inaccessible to the usual
radiation-lowering mechanisms that were extensively employed beginning
the very next day-- water hosing, and “coating” with sand/earth.
To sum up, my “Many Nukes” and resultant China Syndrome Hypothesis, is

well supported by the known concepts of nuclear warhead fratricide, and
the low (0.5-6.0%) efficiency of fission bombs. Indeed all the facts involving
exploding numerous micro-nukes in an enclosed (or partially enclosed)
space appears to make the China Syndrome aftermath not only plausible,
but inevitable!
Did Two Nuclear Reactors, not Nuclear Bombs,

Destroy the WTC on 9/11?
Review of William Tahil’s Book, “Ground Zero: The Nuclear

Demolition of the WTC”, and of his Reactor Hypothesis
Tahil’s book is now downloadable for free here:

http://www.nucleardemolition.com. I welcome Tahil’s comments
and corrections, if any, to this review and analysis of his work, via email to
Spooked, who will forward to me. Tahil was one of the very first to write
and publish on the nuclear demolition of the WTC on 9/11. Also, other than
myself, he is the only other scientist, or person, to write about the China
Syndrome aftermath. As my illness prevented me from writing on 9/11 until
2007, his 2006 book was the first to correctly attribute the great heat and
molten metal that existed at the WTC for months afterwards, to the China
Syndrome of still-fissioning material. While I discovered that independently,
he was the first to demonstrate this in public writing. He deserves much
credit for this. The Finnish military expert, Tahil, and myself, are the
three people who have written proposed nuclear demolition schemes. My
articles on the nuclear destruction of the WTC are here
http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com and my articles on the China
Syndrome are here http://wtc-chinasyndrome.blogspot.com. The
Finn believes a single nuclear bomb was used on each tower, via a
focused, nuclear shape charge in the basement. I have stated that
numerous mini- or micro-nukes were employed in the towers, and in all the
other WTC buildings. I have further highlighted that great redundancy was
employed, and that numerous nukes either were sabotaged, fizzled on
their own, or were impacted (without being triggered themselves), by other
exploding nukes. And so many nukes did not go off as planned, and their
unused fissile material later gave rise to the China Syndrome. My article on
the early attempted nuking of WTC7, which failed, is good evidence
of fizzled, or sabotaged nukes. Thus there were many nukes available,
whose fissile material was not employed in the destruction, and which gave
rise to the China Syndrome, in my hypothesis. Please read all my articles,
including the one on "fratricided" nukes here.
Now Tahil is unique among the nuclear 9/11 proponents, in that he alone
believes that two nuclear reactors-- not nuclear bombs-- were employed to
demolish the two towers. While my 9/11 nuclear scenario is different from
Tahil’s, and I have explained in lesser detail before why I think mine is
correct, and his is incorrect, I have always stated (and still do) that his work
should be read by all, as I could be wrong, and he could be right, or
possibly there are elements of truth, where we may both be right. Looking
at the different nuclear 9/11 scenarios, the Finn, and I, believe the evidence
points to nuclear bombs. The Finn believes a single, fission-free, 4th
generation thermonuclear device destroyed each tower. This is based on
the govt’s Tritium finding. Tahil does not mention the Tritium evidence, and
goes with pure fission at the WTC. I have written several things
chronologically as the evidence, and my thinking evolved. First I went with
both sets of evidence, namely that either fusion (tritium) enhanced fission
bombs, or a fission-triggered fusion bombs, were employed. Later I noted
the way the regime has total control of all scientific data, and could block
release of the most damning data. I stated that it is possible that the Tritium
finding was a red herring to divert people into looking for the fission-less
fusion bomb, precisely because this would stop people from realizing there
was a "China Syndrome" aftermath, at the WTC-- which the regime wishes
to hide at all costs. (Presumably only fission can yield the China
Syndrome.) So I have stated it is possible that all nukes employed on 9/11
were fission bombs, and the tritium data is spurious.
One of the nuclear 9/11 proponents, William Deagle, M.D., further lends
support to my redundant nuclear bomb hypothesis with his direct
knowledge of a Fort Collins U.S. Army Forensics Team
member who was immediately sent in to the OKC bombing
site in 1995. This man told Deagle (his physician) directly, that he and
the team brought out two unexploded micro-nuclear bombs, and one
unexploded C4 pineapple bomb, from the 10-story Murrah building, after its
destruction. This Army man said that the nukes were emplaced by ATF
and FBI personnel. He further stated that his Army team was under armed
supervision by Wackenhut guards, who tested that they did not remove any
radioactive evidence. We can see from this, that great redundancy (extra
nuclear bomb emplacement) was employed at OKC. Remember that
Murrah was only 10 stories tall, and nowhere near as wide as the towers or
WTC7. Consider the total volume of the WTC towers, the 47 story WTC7,
and all the other buildings, and you can see how dozens of redundant
nukes may have been employed in the nuclear destruction of the entire
WTC. If the matter is linear, given the relative volumes, we might even
conclude that 50-100 micro-nukes were emplaced, and they gave rise to
the China Syndrome, in my hypothesis.
For now, let’s examine what Tahil has to say particularly on the subjects of
his nuclear reactor hypothesis, and the China Syndrome aftermath. Much
of Tahil’s hypothesis rests on his interpretation of the U.S. Geological
Survey (USGS) Dust Analysis data here. Tahil seems to view the USGS
data, and all govt data/studies at face value. He does not seem to realize
the possibility, or likelihood, that errors of omission, or commission, were
utilized in various Gov’t studies, whereas I have highlighted this in my
articles. Tahil particularly mocks those who state that the Seismic records
were doctored-- which includes me. I base my view on several things,
including eyewitness testimony of those at Ground Zero, and a friend who
lived a mile north, and who described books falling off shelves, at the
moment of the first CGI “plane hit,”-- or WTC1 basement (nuclear)
explosion. Also we know that the Gov’t actually asked one Seismic Lab to
“re-do” their calculations.
Let’s get back to the USGS dust study that Tahil uses for much of his
hypothesis. I have stated that this study is heavily flawed in many ways.
Some of my criticisms, I will now list:
-- Did not test for (or report findings on) Plutonium.
-- Did not look for anything smaller than 2.5 microns, or did not delineate
this, when labs had, for years prior, equipment that would have quantified
dust down to 10 nanometer size.
-- Only looked at a small area, mostly within 0.5 Km from the towers, when
the dust settled much further away, and
-- A good deal of the dust went up in smoke! Thus the smallest particles
ended up far away. See my articles again.
-- Samples were taken 5-6 days later, after a rain/wind storm on day 2.
-- Did not differentiate differing isotopes of a given element. (Differing

isotopes have the same number of protons, but differing numbers of
neutrons in their nuclei. Isotopes behave very differently regarding nuclear
processes including radiation release, and further fissioning.)
I have highlighted the reason the regime prevented, or perhaps more likely
ALTERED the data on the smallest sized dust particles. It requires far
greater energy (only nukes) to create the tiniest dust particle size.
Now Tahil concentrates on the USGS dust study, and in particular its
findings regarding the elements Strontium, Barium, Zinc, and several
others. He uses the 12-- out of 35-- sample sites that yielded Strontium. He
has made some very good findings regarding the near total correlation of
Strontium and Barium in the dust samples. This shows a common origin,
he asserts, and is likely right. This, he says virtually proves fission occurred
as Strontium and Barium are two common “daughter” elements in the
fissioning of Uranium. This is likely correct as well. But he also states
several things that are not correct. He makes these mistakes throughout
the book. He only considers the buildings’ concrete or steel as sources of
the dust. This is a serious flaw. The buildings’ entire contents-- from people
to furniture, etc., etc.-- must be considered! He also at times, assumes one
particular isotope for an element, e.g. Strontium 90, and not its other four
naturally occurring isotopes, and its other 15 artificially created isotopes.
On page 24, Tahil states, “These elements [Barium and Strontium] simply
should not be present in building rubble or building materials in even a valid
trace amount, which would be less than 10 ppm…” In succeeding pages,
he elaborates that very high levels of Strontium and Barium in the dust
study could only have come from the fissile Uranium in two nuclear
reactors, very deep underneath the two towers. But, we shall see that
Strontium, Barium, and Zinc are NOT to be unexpectedly found in the
vaporized rubble, as Tahil states. Thus their source need not be from
massive amounts of fissioned Uranium, as Tahil claims. There are many
common, known sources of Strontium. A Strontium compound can make
up as much as 10% of the mass in toothpaste for “sensitive teeth.”
Strontium is a normal component of everyone’s bones and teeth. And Tahil
does not take into account the total vaporization of half of the nearly 3000
human victims, and partial vaporization of the others. Other Strontium
sources include pottery, color TVs, aerosol paints, drugs for osteoporosis,
and other sources. However there is one source of Strontium that has
overarching importance here.
Tahil ignores the fact that Strontium occurs in Limestone. And Limestone is
often the major component of concrete. How much Strontium might there
be in the 100,000 tons of concrete in each WTC tower? Let us look at one
type of limestone called oolite limestone.
Strontium in oolitic limestone can occur at up to 10,800 ppm (parts per

million)! This study found a range from 230 to 10,800, with an average of
414 ppm. But is oolitic limestone used in very large structures? Some of
the largest buildings ever built have indeed used oolitic limestone. This
includes the Empire State Building and the Pentagon!
Then there is the issue of Barium. Wiki notes that Barium is a "getter" in
vacuum tubes, is used in glassmaking, and is used in a coating for the
electrodes in the ubiquitous fluorescent lamps. Furthermore, Wiki says,
“Lithopone, a pigment that contains Barium Sulfate and Zinc Sulfide, is a
permanent white that has good covering power…” Here wiki indicates that
Lithopone may be commonly “used in interior paints and in some enamels.”
Thus we see that if this pigment was used in the WTC, we have a
Barium/Zinc linkage, without resorting to Uranium fission. But on page 30,
Tahil shows that if one sample site were left out, Barium and Zinc have
nearly a 100% (96%) correlation. Tahil speculates that this correlation
could only be from nuclear fission, and in particular, lesser known “ternary
fission.” He might be right, but you see from my Lithopene example, this
one correlation could be explained without fission. The Lithopene example
does not disprove fission, but it shows that any one of these correlations is
not conclusive of anything. They have limitations.
Also Barium, some analysts assert, is one of the main ingredients in

the ubiquitous, and notorious, Chemtrails. These trails have been seen in
the skies for the last 15 years or more. As they stay up for great lengths of
time, they may be nanoparticles. It’s even possible that by now, their
contents have mixed with the atmosphere, and the entire Earth has been
saturated with their contents. Of course, ongoing regions getting this
“treatment” will have very high doses for some time. The Hair Mineral
Analysis, done on people, has shown a great increase in the levels of
Barium, over the last 10 years. This means that some Barium compound
has gotten into people. Regarding the USGS dust samples, the relatively
large percentage of Barium, in the USGS study, could even have come
from the vaporized people, or from significant mixing of the WTC dust with
atmospheric Barium, or from some local Chemtrail spraying within the 5-6
days of the WTC destruction, before the samples were collected. If the
Barium were ubiquitous, say from the atmosphere--and its adherence to
the smoke from the WTC, the WTC dust might come down with much
Barium in it. Thus there may have been a significant base level of both
Strontium and Barium from common, non-nuclear sources.
Zinc is also cited on page 143 when Tahil extrapolates and concludes that
a massive amount of Uranium was fissioned on 9/11-- from two reactors.
But Zinc is also not rare, as Tahil claims. Zinc is the major metal in pennies
and is in batteries, steel, paint pigments, and many other sources.
But again Tahil may be right, because I have not proven that Lithopene
was used at the WTC, unless it is/was ubiquitous. Nor have I proven what
the level of Strontium in the limestone in the concrete was. However,
Tahil’s body of evidence, in this book, which includes several correlations
of daughter products of fission, his analysis of the dust from the girders
whereby Tahil concludes that elements were blasted onto the girders, and
were still fissioning when collected on the girders, and all his other findings,
indicate that there was fission in the WTC on 9/11/01. But the amount of
fissioned Uranium is impossible to find by extrapolation of the dust,
because the amounts of Strontium, Barium and Zinc may have been large,
in the WTC, as I have shown above. But thanks to Tahil, we can conclude
that the search for the “holy grail” of fission-free fusion (as the Finnish
Military Expert has done), is likely a fruitless hangout, or red herring, and
should be abandoned. The proof of the fission is in the China Syndrome,
and the sum of the findings in Tahil’s book. More strongly put, be wary of
any alleged Nuclear-9/11 proponents who do not proclaim the China
Syndrome Aftermath of 9/11! There are only four proponents of the China
Syndrome: Tahil, myself (the “Anonymous Physicist”), Spooked, and
recently Deagle.
The following is the crux of Tahil’s nuclear reactor hypothesis. On pages
144-145, Tahil claims that there were massive amounts of Strontium and
Zinc as radioactive fallout, and that then indicates there was a massive
amount of Uranium (nearly 500 tons) that had fissioned. And then that this
claim of nearly 500 tons of fissioned Uranium implies to him that only a
reactor or two could have been the source of the Uranium. All this rests on
the USGS dust study, and Tahil’s extrapolations of its data. Now while I
think his earlier near 100% correlation of Strontium and Barium, goes a
long way toward proving nuclear fission occurred on 9/11, his calculations
leading to 500 tons of Uranium-- and subsequent hypothesis that implies
two massive reactors were sent critical is flawed. On page 144, Tahil-- via
extrapolation of the amounts of these elements in the USGS dust study--
arrives at the estimates of 60 tons of Strontium and 100 tons of Zinc, per
tower, in the fallout from the destruction of the WTC. From this, he further
estimates that there must have been at least 470 tons of Uranium in each
of two reactors deep underground in each tower, that was somehow sent
critical, and exploded in nuclear fashion, and caused the destruction of
each tower, and gave rise to the China Syndrome. While I, of course,
agree with him that the HEAT GENERATION, of up to six months, at the
WTC, leaves only the possibility of a China Syndrome, his assumptions
and math need scrutiny.
1. I have already pointed out that the USGS is greatly flawed, and likely
doctored with numerous errors of omission and commission. See above.
2. He apparently assumes all the Strontium was Strontium 90, and ignores
the other isotopes of Strontium, while the USGS study did not differentiate
isotopes.
3. He assumes the origin of daughter elements is Uranium, when they

could have been fissioned from Plutonium, which was not tested for by the
USGS--or else not published
4. He ignores non-nuclear sources for Strontium and Zinc, and assumes

all Strontium and Zinc came from nuclear fission. See above where I have
strongly disproved this.
So for all these reasons, we arrive at the conclusion that we cannot use
the USGS data for a simple weight ratio analysis. Furthermore, Tahil
compares his nuclear reactor hypothesis to only one micro-nuclear bomb
per tower, and ignores the possibility/probability that
1. Many mini- or micro-nukes were used per tower
2. That the other buildings also were nuked
3. He incorrectly says that a fission nuke has all of its Uranium used up in
its use. This is very curious since he cites Peter Vogel’s book, "The Last
Wave From Port Chicago." And this book is one source that describes the
efficiency of a fission bomb. On page 13-13 Vogel writes that the
Hiroshima Atomic Bomb used only 1.14% of its contained fissile material.
More recently, 6% efficiency for updated nuclear bombs is cited here. This
means that instead of 100% of the U-235 being used up when it goes
critical in a bomb, only 1-6% is used up, and thus 94-99% of its U-235 is
left over for the China Syndrome!
4. Tahil does not realize other possibilities that I have made original
hypotheses on; namely that many redundant nukes were also likely
emplaced. And some, or many, of these may have been either sabotaged
or fizzled because of various reasons.
5. The actual tower destruction scenario observed, fits the use of numerous
small nukes much better than a deep underground set of two massive
reactors.
6. Officially physicists have claimed that a fission reactor cannot

even yield a nuclear explosion. (However, we must take this with a
small grain of salt. If a nuclear reactor could yield a full nuclear explosion,
like a fission bomb, the PTB would never let this be known.)
So from this last list, it is clear that not one, but numerous nukes per tower
could have been employed, and the scenarios I have described, could
have led to a large amount of still-fissioning Uranium or Plutonium
fragments, “left” (after WTC destruction) both near the surface, and deep
underground.
Now we must analyze the geometry and dynamics of the WTC destruction,
to see what fits better: the use of a deep underground nuclear reactor per
tower, or numerous small nukes. One problem is the early sub-basement
explosions that were timed to go off at the same time as the alleged “plane
hits” way above. I have written extensively and cited much evidence, that
these were nuclear devices that were exploded and even that EMPs
(Electromagnetic Pulses) were yielded at those times. Tahil agrees that
these explosions were nuclear. He cites an article that I have cited
numerous times written by WTC Engineer Mike Pecoraro. Pecoraro was
below the sub-basement C level (presumably at the D level, but not
described explicitly), when his colleague saw “flickering lights” (EMP?) and
they ascended to the C level. He says, "There was nothing there but
rubble, we're talking about a 50 ton hydraulic press gone!" Pecoraro and a
co-worker then “made their way to the parking garage, but found that it,
too, was gone…” As they then ascended to the B Level, one floor above,
they “were astonished to see a steel and concrete fire door that weighed
about 300 pounds, wrinkled up like a piece of aluminum foil" and lying on
the floor. Now I have asserted, the only thing that could have done these
things is neutron bombardment and/or million-degree temperatures, both
from a nuke. Tahil says his nuclear reactors were well below the seven
known sub-basement levels of the towers. And the reactors were sent
critical at WTC destruct time. But he also says he believes the earlier
“Pecoraro explosion” was nuclear.
Thus we have several problems with the nuclear reactor hypothesis:
1. How does a reactor go critical for the earlier Pecoraro basement,

nuclear explosion, and still be capable of being used again--in any
coherent fashion? And the destruction of the towers was very well
controlled.
2. In this light, how can any reactor being melted down, and going critical,
be used in such a controlled, coherent, relatively precise and symmetrical
fashion, so many floors below what it is to destroy, when a reactor gone
critical implies much chaos? As opposed to numerous, strategically placed
small nukes.
3. How can Pecoraro have survived a nuclear explosion from a reactor

below his level (and not know that that was what happened), and then go
above him to two floors that were nuked? Unless small nuclear bomb(s)
were utilized at those levels.
4. Now I can see how the observed deep underground flowing metal,
weeks and months later, might possibly be from this deep underground
reactor, but what about the hot rubble pile and its fissioning material not far
from the surface?
5. What about the possibility of breaking through to the Hudson (if not
directly underneath, then just a bit West of the WTC) if the reactor were so
far down, and made to explode, nuclear-wise?
My “Many Nukes” hypothesis, which includes my “Many Nukes

fizzled/sabotaged/impacted/fratricided” hypothesis, that I have authored--
remember the Finn said only one nuke per tower, which thus has some of
these same flaws-- seems to fit all that happened to the WTC, on 9/11,
better. Numerous redundant, fizzled or sabotaged nukes, higher up may
have given rise to the large hot rubble pile. Larger nukes in the sub-
basement gave rise to the flowing molten metal seen there months later.
There may have been many nukes emplaced in the sub-basement that led
to events that appear “reactor-like.” Why compare a reactor only to one
nuke? And given that only 1-6% of a fission nuke’s fissile material is used
in its explosion, and there were many nukes that did go off, this too allows
for a China Syndrome at the WTC, even if there were not any redundant
nukes present.
There are numerous other matters that are incorrect. On page 153, Tahil
virtually states that Chernobyl was a nuclear explosion when it was not. It
resulted from heat from nuclear fission causing steam expansion, which
caused an explosion and the China Syndrome of blasted radioactive
fragments releasing great heat where they landed. Earlier in the book, he
has it right, that Chernobyl was not a nuclear explosion, but not on page
153. Tahil apparently believes that the “Plane hits” were real, instead of the
impossible CGI, they clearly are. He believes that the earlier 1993 WTC
explosion was conventional, when I have highlighted the eyewitness
testimony of engineer Phil Schneider who said he saw proof that it was
nuclear-- I guess things like Pecoraro described. (See my articles.) Tahil
often cites new, or hypothesized Physics for some of the phenomena, when
this is precarious at best, and makes it look like the ludicrous DEW
hangout. E.g., he states that Koenig’s sphere was involved in the WTC
destruction as a “neutron reflector/focuser”. After seeing the
documentary on Koenig’s sphere, and its maker, and its creation,
and how it was moved, and is still there in a nearby public park, I seriously
doubt this speculation, if not also on Physics grounds. His website cites a
sewer steam explosion in NYC, miles North of WTC, several years after
9/11, as some proof of a massive nuclear reactor underneath Manhattan.
But NYC has had such stream explosions for 150 years.
Tahil seems to want to think there were massive neutron fluxes all about
the WTC during or after the destruction. He states that the strangely
damaged cars are proof of large neutron fluxes at those spots. But I have
amply demonstrated that the evidence fits EMPs, vastly better than
anything else. These are the cars whose boundaries of doors caused only
part of the car to have heated up, and caught fire. In my analysis of this, I
revealed how only an EMP would cause part of a car to intercept the EMP,
which becomes current, and then great heat. But this is only in metal, and
the boundaries (air), between car doors, prevents said current from flowing
across to the other car door. See especially my analyses of EMT Ondrovic’
experience of EMP causing a car door to explode onto her, and the
flickering lights in WTC6, before it was nuked. Neutron fluxes would NOT
have caused this, as neutron fluxes would not show a distinction with car
door boundaries, as we see with several cars! So Tahil appears to try too
hard to see neutrons all about, because he wants to fit this to massive
reactors under the WTC, and that area of Manhattan.
I think his analysis of his Figure 52, on Page 123, is incorrect. This is not
quite like a volcano. Look at the height of the smoke at top, compared to
the height of the other extant tower. It has not shot way into the sky yet.
Rather it shows that the top part of WTC1 was vaporized. So this could
have been from a nuke at the top to start things off. He has, or had, some
connection to Alex Jones. His website had said that if you can’t reach him
via email, it was NSA interference, and to contact Alex Jones. I have no
problem with the NSA inference, but Alex Jones? He has been vehemently
anti-nuclear-911, and anti-NPT (the planes were merely CGI). Jones would
never have Tahil’s work on his site. Jones was sent in to head the 911truth
movement, after the regime assassinated true conspiracy expert Bill
Cooper, within two months of 9/11. Why does/did a Nuclear-9/11 proponent
have an anti-nuclear-911 person be his contact?
On the other hand, numerous things Tahil says are very intelligent and
revealing, even bold. First credit goes to him for his finding of near 100%
correlation between Strontium and Barium, on page 26. This indicates
nuclear fission occurred at the WTC, but is not proof. His ignoring the
Tritium finding may ultimately prove to be both bold and wise. While others,
like the Finnish military expert, considered only a pure fusion bomb, this
then could not have given rise to the China Syndrome of which the HEAT
GENERATION evidence is massive and conclusive. I wrote that the Tritium
finding-- or more correctly, its release may have been a red herring to get
people to look only for nuclear devices that could not have caused the
China Syndrome. So Tahil as I indicated, may be both bold and brilliant
here. Tahil also reveals, on page 115, evidence of birth defects after 9/11,
in NYC, that I have not seen before.
His motto on the cover is also good: Salus populi suprema lex esti or "The
welfare of the people shall be the supreme law." Tahil, of course, asserts
that the American regime has the opposite view. He asserts that there was
massive radiation, at the WTC, and he makes the bold assertion that
Manhattan should still be evacuated! If he is right, how many American
cities may have reactors placed underneath them? Now I still think that if
this is the goal--and it wouldn’t surprise me if you have read my “Ultimate
Truths” series (anonymous-physicist.blogspot.com)--they could
more easily just place nuclear bombs underneath edifices in big cities.
Sadly, for reasons my readers may know, I think there is a fair possibility
that this could be the case, as above-ground nukes are more easily gauged
and intercepted by OTHERS. The Rockefeller owned or controlled WTC
land area is far from their only land ownership in this country. Could the
Rockefeller-donated United Nations land be next? In this light, and in
cohesion with what I wrote above about the OKC bombing, I ask did a
China Syndrome result there, if it was nuked? Deagle says his Army
agent/patient said that Wackenhut guards measured and prevented
anything radioactive from being removed. I trust that means that the
regime’s agents removed all things radioactive. How many cancers have
there been in OKC responders, or OKC residents, subsequently? How
many more buildings or skyscrapers must be nuked before
the People wake up?
Then Tahil’s analysis of this photo also appears to be very astute, as far
as demonstrating the PTB’s desire to hide the China Syndrome. The photo
is of the so-called Light Memorial. This was the extremely bright, double-
blue lights, that were turned on for weeks, a few months after 9/11, from
dusk to 11 P.M. Tahil surmises that this began when they finally reached
the reactor remnant areas, or large areas of fissioning Uranium. And while
they were doing something to it, or carting it away, its blue light of the
Cherenkov radiation (from nuclear fission) would have been visible. I have
written about this in regards to one photo that Steven Jones “orange-ified,”
when responders were peering into something underground at the WTC. I
related this to the blue light seen when nuclear fissioning elements (cored
out sphere and cylindrical insert) were erroneously kept together for too
long a time, during the “tickling the dragon’s tail experiments,” at Los
Alamos, that killed two nuclear scientists. Tahil asserts that the reactor
remnant was uncovered at that time, so they needed to do the light trick. I
would say that large areas of fissioning fragments must have been
uncovered, for them to do this. But need it have been a reactor, or its
remnants? There could have been many nuclear bombs in the sub-
basement area that led to a large area, with much fissioning going on. But
perhaps this is one item of evidence where his reactor hypothesis may fit
better than my many nukes hypotheses. Or could a much smaller reactor
have been there, and elements of both hypotheses be true? The blue lights
are strictly not proof of anything, we must remember. But this regime does
almost everything it does, for a sinister reason. Another photo Tahil
uniquely has (page 101) is that of a rescue dog with his responder master
walking the WTC grounds. Even the dog is wearing protective boots
because of the great heat there and then! Also on page 101, Tahil has a
photo of the large congealed mass of bullets from WTC6. He states that 43
days after 9/11 the heat was still so intense, an injury to the face of a
responder occurred when at least one of the bullets in the mass
discharged. Here is more proof of this great heat weeks and months after
9/11, which the intel agents for “DEW” and the O.C.T. laughably continue
to deny.
Thus I conclude this review of Tahil’s book and hypothesis with the
following. Tahil deserves much credit for his statistical analysis chapter,
which helps demonstrate the likelihood that nuclear fission took place on
9/11 at the WTC, and for first exposing the existence of the China
Syndrome at the WTC. His hypothesis that this had to be from two
massive, deep underground nuclear fission reactors that were sent critical,
and exploded akin to a nuclear fission bomb, is much less compelling, and
more evidence fits my “many nukes” hypothesis, with possibly one
evidentiary exception. Therefore it is possible that he may still be right, at
least in part. For that reason, and other things cited above, I recommend
everyone who is not an intel agent, and wishes to know what might have
occurred on 9/11, read his book, as well as all my articles. The case for two
huge reactors that were made to undergo nuclear explosions has not been
made. Neither can we completely rule out that the China Syndrome that
existed at the WTC for several months after 9/11/01 was, in part, from a
much smaller reactor present. I am not saying I believe this, but that it
cannot be excluded. Furthermore, I can even perceive one reason why it
would have been there. A breeder reactor could even have produced the
fissile material for the coming nuclear bomb destruction of the WTC. Or
there could have been both many micro-nukes used, and a fission reactor
was also exploded with a micro-nuke at the end. I throw these ideas out for
completeness. In conclusion I remain unconvinced that the evidence
indicates a large nuclear fission reactor was underneath each of the
towers, and suffered a nuclear explosion, as my “Many Nukes” hypothesis
appears to better explain the details of the WTC destruction, and the China
Syndrome aftermath. I welcome feedback and genuine criticism from Tahil
on this review, or of my own nuclear-911 hypotheses, and also the same
from any non-intel agent. As Tahil wrote, Salus populi suprema lex esti.
World Trade Center Demolition: A Brief Summary: WTC Destruction & High Temperature Aftermath: ONLY Nuclear Bombs and the China Syndro...
Missbrauch melden Nächstes Blog» Blog erstellen Anmelden
world trade center demolition
This blog will deal with the

the destruction of the world
Thursday, October 23, 2008 trade center buildings 1, 2
and 7 on 9/11/01, and in
particular will focus on the
idea that the towers were
brought down by nuclear
A Brief Summary: WTC Destruction & High demolition.
Temperature Aftermath: ONLY Nuclear Bombs and
the China Syndrome Fit All the Evidence
About Me
NOTE: PLEASE DISSEMINATE THIS DEFINITIVE SUMMARY ON THE Name: spooked
NUKING OF THE WTC AS WIDELY AS POSSIBLE! Location: United States
by The Anonymous Physicist The official 9/11 story is a lie. The 9/11 plane
hijackings and crashes were clever hoaxes. The
In attempting to ascertain what caused the destruction of the WTC on WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7 towers were brought
9/11/01, and the great heat and molten metal observed for up to six down by demolition, and there is evidence for the
months afterward, one must account for ALL the phenomena involved in use of small nuclear bombs in the demolition of
WTC destruction, and the aftermath-- and not just one or two factors. Only WTC1 and 2. All in all, 9/11 was a massive and
nuclear bombs and the resulting China Syndrome can account for ALL cruel hoax foisted upon the world, done in order
phenomena observed. The overview and numerous supporting articles on to spark the obscene "war on terror", to cover up
the nuclear destruction of the WTC are here: financial fraud and to further the ends of the
wtcdemolition.blogspot.com But, at the outset, we should realize global elite. 9/11 was only the most egregious of
that there is an abundance of evidence that the O.C.T. (Official Conspiracy several other recent false-flag terror operations.
Theory) is quite bogus. For example, sworn testimony from
View my complete profile
firemen/responders contains their witnessing of loud
explosions from the onset of tower destruction. This alone
destroys the OCT of gravity-driven, progressive collapse. More 9/11 Links (Note: I present a wide
variety of 9/11 sites here for the
A brief summary of the nuclear aspects now follows. purposes of diversity. I leave it up to
you to judge their content.)
1. First, low yield nukes (mini-nukes or micro-nukes) are a proven fact that
the U.S Govt has admitted to since the 1950’s with their Davey Crocket
General 9/11 Sites
rifle, and more recently with a physicist’s testimony to Congress.
9/11 Blimp
It is also documented fact that since the 1960’s, and Project
9/11 Busters
Plowshare, low radiation nukes-- and later neutron bombs-- have been
9/11 CGI Watch
available, and were planned for excavation projects and such. My “many 9/11 Closeup (Gerard Holmgren)
small nukes” WTC hypothesis indicates that numerous low yield nukes 9/11 Complicity
went off INSIDE (near the center of) the towers. They vaporized anything 9/11 Cover-Up
near them (via million degree temperatures and/or high neutron flux), but 9/11 Dossier (UK)
the yield of these micro-nukes was deliberately small enough not to
9/11 Encyclopedia
vaporize the outer structure. This also ensured that any radiation was
contained during detonation. And Plowshare, and neutron bombs, prove 9/11 Foreknowledge
low radiation nukes have been available for decades. 9/11 Hoax
9/11 Oddities
2. MASSIVE EVIDENCE of ELECTROMAGNETIC PULSES (EMP) FROM
9/11 Overview
NUKES. This includes the eyewitness, sworn testimony of EMT responder,
9/11 Oz (Australian)
Patricia Ondrovic (and others). She reported that as WTC1 was beginning 9/11 Plot
to be destroyed, she saw flickering lights in WTC6 lobby where she tried to 9/11 Proof
enter, but was stopped. And just outside at that time, cars caught fire 9/11 Research (Jim Hoffman)
without any visible reason, and one then had its car door explode off of it; 9/11 Resources
and the door hit and injured her as she began to flee the area. Exactly how 9/11 Review.org
EMP from nukes did all this is explained here, along with other evidence 9/11 Review.com
http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2008/10/brief-new-summary-wtc-destruction-high.html[07.11.2010 14:43:57]
of EMP during tower destruction from nuclear bombs. 9/11 Stealth

9/11 Strike
3. DUST PARTICLE SIZE WAS LESS THAN 2.5 MICRONS-- & LIED 9/11 True Story
ABOUT by the Gov’t’s main OCT (Official “Collapse” Theory) 9/11 "U"
engineer/author. You can think of a mortar and pestle, and grinding 9/11 Verses
something large into smaller and smaller pieces. It takes more and more Awoken Research Group
Complete 9/11 Timeline (Paul
energy input to yield smaller and smaller pieces. A nuclear bomb is known Thompson)
to yield particle sizes down to 10 nanometers. (1 nanometer is 1 billionth of Finnish 9/11 Site
a meter). And Govt scientists had equipment to analyze the WTC dust Finnish 9/11 Site in English
down to 10-nanometer size, if they wanted to, and should have. Unless Gallerize
they did, and have refused to release this. What they (the U.S. Geological German Engineers 9/11 site
Survey scientists) did was lump together all dust sizes less than 2.5 Hybrideb's 9/11 site
microns and released this data. (A micron is 1 millionth of a meter, and a Icelandic 9/11 site
thousand times larger than 1 nanometer). Nonetheless, the Govt’s main Jane Doe's 9/11 site
engineer/author, Z.P. Bazant, numerous times wrote papers that claimed Juscogen's 9/11 site
that 10 microns was the smallest sized particles created during WTC Killtown
Oil and Empire 9/11 (Mark Robinowitz)
destruction, and later collected by USGS scientists. For years he did not
Portland Indy Media 9/11
cite the work that showed, this. Last year he did cite a reference, and it led
119 Questions about 9/11
back to the 2.5 micron study, NOT to the 10 microns he claimed as the
Let's Roll 9/11
smallest dust particle size! So he flat out committed fraud here. He had to Morgan Reynolds WTC Demolition
do this as his bogus papers claim that the gravitational potential energy Essay
(height times weight) of the towers accounted for the energy needed to Morgan Reynolds 9/11 Commission
Essay
create the smallest dust particle size. And there isn’t enough energy from
Missile Gate (analysis of 1st hit)
his theory to account for 2.5 micron size dust, let alone the much smaller
Nerdcities 9/11
dust sizes that the USGS did not ascertain or release! The bogus physics Operation 9/11
and math from Bazant and others is here. Planet Quo 9/11
Rick Siegel (9/11 Eyewitness)
4. MELTED, HANGING SKIN WITHOUT FIRE was reported by at least 4 RINF 9/11 Archive
known WTC survivors. This includes WTC worker Felipe David, Terrorize (Danish 911 site)
whose own words state this occurred without fire, but his story when told The Mysteries of 9/11
by another, has “fire” added. There are also two women who THE TRUTH ABOUT SEPT 11 (Compiled
by Gerard Holmgren)
reported (on the “Larry King Show”) that a similar thing
Shunned
happened to them, and they don’t know why, because they too were
Physics 911
not in any fire. And there is also a security guard with a similar report. The
Physics 9/11.co.nr
security guard and Felipe David had this happen to them in the lobby and Plague Puppy's Cafe
the sub-basement area of WTC1 respectively. Outside the towers, Plague Puppy: Alternate Site
firemen/responders also felt great heat on their skin without Question 911
being near any fire DURING TOWER DESTRUCTION. Only the Truth 911
thermal rays of a nuclear bomb can account for this. They go out the Brad's 911 site
farthest when a nuke goes off. And hanging skin was a common Club Ivy's 911 site
occurrence in Hiroshima survivors. Note that the outside firemen feeling Brad's old 9/11 site
heat on their skin (without fire near them) also disproves “DEW”, as they Flamesong 9/11 Essay and Links
are NOT in the towers nor right under them either, and thus if “directed Serendipity (various essays on 9/11)
energy beams did it”, and these must be coherent, they would not diverge Stop the Lie 9/11
and cause heat far from their target! So no “DEW” was involved. The Strange Images of 9/11/2001
Total 9/11 Info
Unanswered Questions
5. SUB-BASEMENT LEVEL, 50-TON STEEL PRESS & HEAVY DOOR
Questions Questions
VAPORIZED. At the same time as Felipe David’s nightmare was unfolding,
The Web Fairy
and also in the sub-basement, WTC engineer Mike Pecoraro
Wing TV
reports going up a level and seeing that a sub-basement
level was in shambles and was “just gone.” Also he states a 50-
ton press has also been apparently vaporized, and a 300 pound 9/11 Activism
steel/concrete door has just been left shriveled up like foil. The only things 9/11 Blogger
that could do this are the multi-million degree temperatures, and neutron 9/11 Citizens' Watch
bombardment, from a nuclear bomb. Coupling this with the four survivors 9/11 Skeptics Unite!
who had melted, hanging skin at this same time, we have evidence of 911 Truth.org
blast, high temperatures, neutron bombardment and thermal rays-- all 911 Truth LA.us
virtual proof of nuclear bomb use. 911 Truth LA.org
911 Truth Emergence
911 We Know
6. HEAT GENERATION AT THE WTC FOR UP TO 6 MONTHS AFTER
911 Truth Movement Musings
9/11- -THE CHINA SYNDROME AFTERMATH (CSA) (see http://wtc-
9-11 Visibility Project
chinasyndrome.blogspot.com) No heat “lingers” for weeks and 9-11 UK
months, not alleged jet fuel, not alleged thermite (which would have been 9/11 Family Steering Committee
used up either in minutes or hours--or during its use as an explosive). We NY 9/11 Truth
have the documented, witnessed, and well photographed and
San Francisco 9/11 Truth

videotaped great heat and molten metal for weeks, and Scholars for 9/11 Truth
indeed for up to six months underground at the WTC-- until all Community Currency 9/11
radioactive fission fragments were carted away. No heat lingers for that Summer of Truth
long; this could only have been heat GENERATION. The evidence of great Proposition 911
heat throughout much of the rubble pile and even higher temperatures Reopen 911
underneath the two towers and WTC7 is massive. It included melted Deception Dollars
firemen’s boots, even dogs had to wear special boots, a mass of Justice for 9/11
congealed bullets in WTC6 going off weeks later from heat, and many
photos of steam emanation from the continual water hosing of the 9/11 Specialty Sites
“hotspots” all around the WTC. The China Syndrome HAD TO ARISE Team 8 Plus
because each of the numerous small nukes used up only 1-6% of its fissile Flight 93 Hoax
material-- which is standard for nukes. The remainder was then available WTC Demolition
as radioactive fragments, releasing great heat for a long time (until The Ultimate Hijacker Compilation
removed), as the half-life of Uranium 235 is 700 million years. And it is 9/11 Photo Analysis
likely that there were numerous, redundant nukes employed, and the Evidence of Explosives on 9/11
phenomena of "fratricided" and fizzled nukes may also have Demolition, the Truth of 9/11 and the
WTC
occurred as these are common with nuclear detonations.
9/11 and the Impossible: the WTC
These effects likely further exacerbated the China Syndrome. The collapse
radioactive fragments were somewhat dispersed throughout the rubble pile, WTC Streaking Object, WTC7 theories
and in greatest concentration underneath the towers and WTC7-- where Flight 77 FOIA site
water and sand treatments could not readily be employed. Note that the Flight 93 Crash.com
alleged Tritium finding that the Govt released, may be a red herring to fool Pentagon Research
people to look for top-secret unknown types of nukes, which couldn’t have Brad's Pentagon Analysis
led to the CSA, which is what clearly occurred. The ludicrous lying (“there Where Is Osama (The Osama Clock)
never was any heat during or after WTC destruction”) or the poor attempts
to create new laws of chemistry and physics by alleged 9/11truthers 9/11 Flash Movies
(“super nanocomposite thermite burns forever”) only shows how desperate 9/11 chronology (network footage)
the Govt is to hide the China Syndrome Aftermath. Buddy Buddy
Pentagon Strike
7. THE MISSING PEOPLE, FURNITURE, steel & other contents of the 911 Questions
towers. Destruction of the towers vaporized many of the nearly 3,000
people who died, as well as much furniture, steel and other building
contents. The medical examiner was unable to find or utilize Reasonably reliable "Conspiracy Sites"
any strands of DNA for over 1100 people. The rubble pile from the that question 9/11
two towers was only a couple of stories high when it should have been Rigorous Intuition
Wing TV
several times higher from a “collapse,” or even a conventional demolition.
Xymphora
There is much missing mass from the “extraordinarily high temperatures” as
Killtown's Blog
fire engineering Professor Barnett declared after examining vaporized steel,
The Bulldog Manifesto
that occurred during tower/WTC7 destruction. Nukes vaporize matter near Center for an Informed America
their hypocenter. Thermite, thermobarics, etc. DO NOT. Contrary to what George Washington
some claim, neither thermite nor thermobarics could vaporize the missing Centre for Research on Globalization
people, furniture, steel and other contents, as detailed here. Prison Planet (Alex Jones)
Daily Two Minutes of Hate
8. CLASSICAL GOV’T DISINFO METHODS ENSUED whereby their The Emperor's New Clothes
agents put out supposedly “alternative theories” involving alleged “secret, Public Action (Carol Valentine)
new technologies” that are either evidence-free and/or impossible. Space Propaganda Matrix
Beams/DEW (Directed Energy Weapons), or ludicrous “super Daniel Hopsicker
nanocomposite thermite burns forever” theories were created by Cryptome
the intel agencies to cover up the nuking of the WTC, and the China Crimes and Corruptions of the New
World Order News
Syndrome Aftermath. (Thermite cools off in minutes or hours.) These Covert 2 Overt Analysis
“theories” desperately try to claim new phenomena or new laws of physics
and chemistry--as does the 9/11 Commission’s ludicrous “findings.”
Good Intro Books to
9. More now on the issue of Radiation: The #1 item above showed that the Alternative 9/11 Truth
Govt has had mini-nukes, and micro-nukes for decades, and that low- "The New Pearl Harbor, Disturbing
radiation yielding nukes have also been around for decades as well. On Questions About the Bush
Administration and 9/11" by David Ray
the other hand, the great heat and molten metal at, and under, Griffin
the WTC for up to six months after 9/11, indicates the existence "The 9/11 Commission Report:
of the China Syndrome Aftermath at the WTC; whereby many responders Omissions And Distortions" by David
Ray Griffin
and Metro New York residents may have been exposed to some radiation 9/11 Revealed by Rowland Morgan and
from radioactive fission fragments that resulted from the use of the many Ian Henshall
micro-nukes. We have much indirect evidence of the effects of radiation "9/11 Synthetic Terror, Made in USA" by
Webster G. Tarpley
poisoning among the 40,000 responders who were at “Ground Zero” in the
"The Terror Timeline" by Paul
weeks and months afterwards. There have been hundreds of Thompson
reported cases of blood, lymph and thyroid cancers among "Crossing the Rubicon" by Michael C.
Ruppert
responders. These types of cancers frequently arise from radiation
"Welcome to Terrorland" by Daniel
exposure, and are much less likely (unlike lung diseases) to arise from Hopsicker
inhalation of toxins. Also, the teeth and hair falling out reported
by several responders are also standard illnesses from
radiation poisoning. These responders’ doctors and lawyers are not "Conspiracy Sites" that deal with 9/11
telling these people that radiation may have caused their illnesses, that I have significant issues with
because the China Syndrome Aftermath remains one of the Govt’s most What Really Happened
closely guarded secrets. However, we can see that the Govt itself was well From the Wilderness (Mike Ruppert)
Arctic Beacon
aware of what it had caused! Standard radiation-lowering methods were
employed beginning the very next morning-- 9/12/01! These included
water dilution/hosing down and sand/earth covering (and Unreliable "Conspiracy Sites" that deal
subsequent removal of this sand/earth) of the rubble pile. with 9/11
These procedures continued for weeks and months precisely because the Break for News
rubble pile, and undergound areas, were replete with radioactive fission Tom Flocco
fragments.
There is some general information on radiation sources that needs Democratic/Progressive News Sites,
elucidation. Due to absorption and other factors, radiation levels can go Blogs and Miscellaneous Links
down quickly-- unless radioactive fragments (radionuclides) are released to Buzzflash
The Raw Story
the environment. Unless one is close (like Felipe David, who appears to
Democratic Underground
have received thermal radiation, and not ionizing radiation)-- or the
Progressive Independent
radiation is very intense-- enough distance/air or most materials, will stop
Think Progress
most forms of radiation. This assumes one does not inhale or ingest Citizens for a Legitimate Government
radioactive particles or radionuclides. The underground WTC areas-- which Common Dreams
likely had the highest radiation yields (and also heat)-- were off limits to all Consortium News
but a few responders. Also, as Hiroshima studies indicated, it Center for Cooperative Research
took decades for many cancers and other illnesses to Cursor
manifest. Note that a Gov’t agency, FEMA, was/is in charge of any Guerrilla News
radiation data for Ground Zero, and could easily have blocked release of Online Journal
any data that found radiation. The U.S. Gov’t has a long, sordid The Memory Hole
record of lying about radiation exposure to soldiers and Information Clearing House
citizens, as noted here when they nuked their own soldiers Press Action
during “atomic tests”. News from Babylon
Unknown News
TV News Lies
Honest people, not in DENIAL, must see the analogy to the Reichstag fire
After Downing Street
set by the German Nazis, in 1933, in Berlin. This was their seat of almost
Eschaton
their entire federal gov’t. And this fire/destruction was used as an excuse to
Daily Kos
destroy their Constitution, and as an excuse for War on “terrorists,” and Talking Points Memo
then all of Europe. There was one difference with the Nazis, however. They Hullabaloo
waited till the middle of the night, when there were no inhabitants in the Billmon
Reichstag building! Of course, that German Gov’t did not admit they did it The Brad Blog
themselves, but that came out after they lost WWII. If U.S. Govt agencies Jesus' General
have certain types of proof that they nuked the WTC, and thus its largest The Rude Pundit
city; does any honest person think these Govt agencies would ever release The Poor Man
this data--unless a new Gov’t came about? There is reason to believe that Juan Cole (Informed Comment)
other crucial data such as WTC rubble pile temperature (AVIRIS, 2nd set), Today in Iraq
and WTC destruction seismic recordings were altered. This physicist Antiwar.com
hypothesizes that WTC responders AND nearby Metro New York residents Iraq Coalition Casualties
and workers, that were exposed either the longest or to certain areas with Constant Pated
Clusterfuck Nation
the “hottest”spots face the risk of getting cancer and other immune
Donkey Rising
disorders from radiation exposure in the years and decades to come. Sadly
Salon
this will prove the China Syndrome Aftermath in the worst possible way.
Slate
Private persons and institutions are urged to get and keep statistics on this,
as the Gov’t will likely cover this up.
My Other Blogs
posted by spooked @ 9:30 AM Humint Events Online
THE WORST PRESIDENT EVER!!!!
Bush Administration War Criminals
Fake Opposition Democrats
Al-CIA-duh
<< Home Ghost Plane
Flight 93 Hoax
Interesting Mainstream Articles on 9/11

Boston Globe 11/23/01 piece
Flight 93 and New Baltimore piece
Flight 93 article and picture gallery
Miscellaneous Items of Interest

CNN infiltrated by US Army Psy-ops
US National Debt Clock
The American Taliban
Peak Oil and

Sustainability/Environmental Sites
The Association for the Study of Peak
Oil and Gas
The Oil Drum
Land of Black Gold
Flying Talking Donkey
Life After the Oil Crash
Richard Heinberg
Grist
The Official 9/11 Story IS a

Conspiracy Theory!
9/11 was a conspiracy, as it involved several
people conspiring to commit a crime. The official
9/11 narrative, as codified by the 9/11
Commission Report, is NOT proven as the most
likely explanation for the events of 9/11/01. The
official 9/11 story is therefore a theory. This
means that the OFFICIAL 9/11 Story is really a
"CONSPIRACY THEORY"!
Statement of Principles
I have no fondness for any religion, as I think it
makes people do extreme and violent things.
Islamic terrorists do exist and I detest them as
much as I detest the true perpetrators of 9/11.
Most likely Islamic terrorists were used as
patsies in 9/11, as part of a highly organized
covert operation by a group affiliated with the US
goverment and US military.
World Trade Center Demolition: 35 Reasons for Many Small Fission Nukes at the WTC

Thursday, July 02, 2009 trade center buildings 1, 2
35 Reasons for Many Small Fission Nukes at the demolition.
WTC
1) heat generation at ground zero for six months (china syndrome) About Me
2) inability to quench ground zero heat with water Name: spooked
3) red hot/molten steel at ground zero Location: United States
4) missing core columns from ground zero (vaporized during destruction)
5) spreading of sand at ground zero consistent with attempts to limit The official 9/11 story is a lie. The 9/11 plane
radiation hijackings and crashes were clever hoaxes. The
6) washing of steel recovered from pile consistent with radiation WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7 towers were brought
decontamination down by demolition, and there is evidence for the
7) extreme security for ground zero steel shipments consistent with limiting use of small nuclear bombs in the demolition of
access to radioactive steel WTC1 and 2. All in all, 9/11 was a massive and
8) extreme security at ground zero, limiting exposure, view of devastation cruel hoax foisted upon the world, done in order
9) extreme pulverization of WTC concrete into very fine particles to spark the obscene "war on terror", to cover up
10) disappearance of over one thousand human bodies from WTC debris financial fraud and to further the ends of the
11) disappearance of furniture, phones, filing cabinets and computers from global elite. 9/11 was only the most egregious of
WTC debris several other recent false-flag terror operations.
12) disappearance of elevator doors, office doors, office cubicle walls,
toilets and sinks from WTC debris View my complete profile
13) several floor fragments fused together in “meteorite” object
14) bone fragments sprayed into Bankers Trust upper floor during More 9/11 Links (Note: I present a wide
destruction variety of 9/11 sites here for the
15) multiple blast waves during destruction of tower purposes of diversity. I leave it up to
16) large fireballs during initiation of WTC1 destruction you to judge their content.)
17) small backpack-sized fission nukes exist
18) fission-nuke technology well-established
19) low efficiency of fission nukes ensures leftover radioactive fragments General 9/11 Sites
and China syndrome 9/11 Blimp
20) EMP formation during tower destruction (exploding cars, partial 9/11 Busters
burning) 9/11 CGI Watch
9/11 Closeup (Gerard Holmgren)
21) Description of heat in WTC blast cloud
9/11 Complicity
22) Extensive cover-up of ground zero air by EPA
9/11 Cover-Up
23) High rate of cancers, including thyroid cancer typically associated with
9/11 Dossier (UK)
radiation exposure, in ground zero responders
24) Melted, hanging skin in WTC survivor Felipe David in absence of fire 9/11 Encyclopedia
25) Vaporized press and crumpled steel door in WTC basement reported 9/11 Foreknowledge
by Pecoraro 9/11 Hoax
26) Steel beam bent in U, without cracking, evidence of extreme high
9/11 Oddities
temps
27) Steel beam bent in U has layer of molten metal on surface 9/11 Overview
28) Extreme overall devastation of two massive towers and blasted out
9/11 Plot
Ground Zero aftermath
9/11 Proof
29) Appearance of fantastical, nonsensical DEW theory by likely govt
9/11 Research (Jim Hoffman)
agents-- uses evidence of nukes (EMP, extreme pulverization of tower into 9/11 Resources
dust) but denies nukes at all costs 9/11 Review.org
30) Appearance of fantastical, nonsensical thermite (super nano-thermite) 9/11 Review.com
theory by likely govt agents-- uses evidence of nukes (molten steel, china
http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2009/07/35-reasons-for-many-small-fission-nukes.html[07.11.2010 14:44:45]
9/11 Stealth
syndrome) but denies nukes at all costs 9/11 Strike
31) Small iron microspheres found by Jones et al in WTC dust— evidence 9/11 True Story
of steel vaporization by high temps of nukes 9/11 "U"
32) Pyroclastic debris cloud during WTC destruction 9/11 Verses
33) Upwards jutting debris trails reminiscent of debris trails formed during Awoken Research Group
underground nuke test Complete 9/11 Timeline (Paul
Thompson)
34) Small bright flashes during destruction of both towers Finnish 9/11 Site
35) Extremely compacted ground zero debris Finnish 9/11 Site in English
Gallerize
posted by spooked @ 4:54 AM German Engineers 9/11 site
Hybrideb's 9/11 site
Icelandic 9/11 site
Jane Doe's 9/11 site
Juscogen's 9/11 site
<< Home Killtown
Let's Roll 9/11
Morgan Reynolds WTC Demolition
Essay
Morgan Reynolds 9/11 Commission
Essay
Nerdcities 9/11
Operation 9/11
Planet Quo 9/11
RINF 9/11 Archive
Terrorize (Danish 911 site)
The Mysteries of 9/11
THE TRUTH ABOUT SEPT 11 (Compiled
by Gerard Holmgren)
Shunned
Physics 911
Physics 9/11.co.nr
Plague Puppy's Cafe
Plague Puppy: Alternate Site
Question 911
Truth 911
Brad's 911 site
Club Ivy's 911 site
Brad's old 9/11 site
Flamesong 9/11 Essay and Links
Serendipity (various essays on 9/11)
Stop the Lie 9/11
The Strange Images of 9/11/2001
Total 9/11 Info
Questions Questions
The Web Fairy
Wing TV
9/11 Activism
9/11 Blogger
9/11 Citizens' Watch
9/11 Skeptics Unite!
911 Truth.org
911 Truth LA.us
911 Truth LA.org
911 Truth Emergence
911 We Know
9-11 UK
9/11 Family Steering Committee
NY 9/11 Truth

Scholars for 9/11 Truth
Community Currency 9/11
Summer of Truth
Proposition 911
Reopen 911
Deception Dollars
Justice for 9/11
9/11 Specialty Sites

Team 8 Plus
Flight 93 Hoax
WTC Demolition
The Ultimate Hijacker Compilation
9/11 Photo Analysis
Evidence of Explosives on 9/11
Demolition, the Truth of 9/11 and the
WTC
collapse
WTC Streaking Object, WTC7 theories
Flight 77 FOIA site
Flight 93 Crash.com
Pentagon Research
Brad's Pentagon Analysis
Where Is Osama (The Osama Clock)
9/11 Flash Movies

9/11 chronology (network footage)
Buddy Buddy
Pentagon Strike
911 Questions
Reasonably reliable "Conspiracy Sites"

that question 9/11
Rigorous Intuition
Wing TV
Xymphora
Killtown's Blog
Center for an Informed America
George Washington
Centre for Research on Globalization
Prison Planet (Alex Jones)
The Emperor's New Clothes
Public Action (Carol Valentine)
Propaganda Matrix
Daniel Hopsicker
Cryptome
Crimes and Corruptions of the New
World Order News
Covert 2 Overt Analysis
Good Intro Books to

Alternative 9/11 Truth
"The New Pearl Harbor, Disturbing
Questions About the Bush
Griffin
"The 9/11 Commission Report:
Omissions And Distortions" by David
Ray Griffin
9/11 Revealed by Rowland Morgan and
Ian Henshall
"9/11 Synthetic Terror, Made in USA" by
Webster G. Tarpley
Thompson
"Crossing the Rubicon" by Michael C.

Ruppert
Hopsicker
"Conspiracy Sites" that deal with 9/11

that I have significant issues with
What Really Happened
From the Wilderness (Mike Ruppert)
Arctic Beacon
Unreliable "Conspiracy Sites" that deal

with 9/11
Break for News
Tom Flocco
Democratic/Progressive News Sites,

Blogs and Miscellaneous Links
Buzzflash
The Raw Story
Think Progress
Citizens for a Legitimate Government
Common Dreams
Consortium News
Center for Cooperative Research
Cursor
Guerrilla News
Online Journal
The Memory Hole
Information Clearing House
Press Action
News from Babylon
Unknown News
TV News Lies
Eschaton
Daily Kos
Talking Points Memo
Hullabaloo
Billmon
The Brad Blog
Jesus' General
The Rude Pundit
The Poor Man
Juan Cole (Informed Comment)
Today in Iraq
Antiwar.com
Iraq Coalition Casualties
Constant Pated
Clusterfuck Nation
Donkey Rising
Salon
Slate
My Other Blogs
Humint Events Online
Al-CIA-duh
Ghost Plane
Flight 93 Hoax


Peak Oil and

Oil and Gas
The Oil Drum
Land of Black Gold
Richard Heinberg
Grist

Conspiracy Theory!
World Trade Center Demolition: The Crucial Differences in the Nuclear 9/11 Theories

The Crucial Differences in the Nuclear 9/11 demolition.
Theories
A Call To Eliminate Nuclear 9/11 Mis- or Dis-Information & About Me

Attain Completeness and Fit all the Known Evidence Name: spooked
Location: United States
The official 9/11 story is a lie. The 9/11 plane
Several, differing WTC nuclear destruction scenarios have been put forth hijackings and crashes were clever hoaxes. The
by their respective authors. While they all have nuclear explosions in WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7 towers were brought
common; they have key differences. These differences must be openly down by demolition, and there is evidence for the
examined, and used to strive towards a final nuclear 911 WTC destruction use of small nuclear bombs in the demolition of
scenario that fits all the evidence, and is not contraindicated by the Laws of WTC1 and 2. All in all, 9/11 was a massive and
Physics. Nuclear WTC scenarios that do not fit all the evidence, or contain cruel hoax foisted upon the world, done in order
false statements, or are contradicted by physical law need to be to spark the obscene "war on terror", to cover up
abandoned. financial fraud and to further the ends of the
global elite. 9/11 was only the most egregious of
several other recent false-flag terror operations.
1. Within a year or two of 9/11/01 people began to post at physics forums View my complete profile
that WTC destruction seemed to involve nuclear bombs.
More 9/11 Links (Note: I present a wide
2. By 2005, the first website appeared which contained a variety of 9/11 sites here for the
nuclear WTC destruction scenario by an Anonymous Finnish purposes of diversity. I leave it up to
Military Expert. He hypothesized that one upwardly-focused, sub- you to judge their content.)
basement shape-charge-like nuke was used to destroy each tower. Tower
destruction, he stated, was likely done with the aid of conventional
explosives as needed. The Finn also hypothesized that the single nuke General 9/11 Sites
was a fourth generation, fission-free thermonuclear (pure fusion) device. 9/11 Blimp
He cited the alleged Tritium finding by U.S. Gov’t scientists. Therefore 9/11 Busters
9/11 CGI Watch
(fusion only), there could be no China Syndrome Aftermath with this theory.
9/11 Complicity
3. In 2006, William Tahil wrote a book and offered it for sale
9/11 Cover-Up
online. (It is now downloadable for free.) Tahil also claimed that one deep 9/11 Dossier (UK)
underground nuclear explosion per tower occurred, but that they weren’t
bombs per se. Rather, he claims, there were two huge, underground, 9/11 Encyclopedia
fission nuclear reactors already present, which were made to go 9/11 Foreknowledge
supercritical, and explode in a nuclear fashion. Tahil wrote that a China 9/11 Hoax
Syndrome Aftermath resulted.
9/11 Oddities
4. In 2007, this Anonymous [American] Physicist offered a 9/11 Overview

detailed, nuclear WTC destruction scenario. Many small nukes
9/11 Plot
were said to have been employed during tower destruction, but some
9/11 Proof
conventional explosives may also have been used to allow the nukes to be
small, and not vaporize the outer tower structure. After first incorporating all 9/11 Resources
the “official” evidence, that included findings that supported both fission 9/11 Review.org
and fusion; he [I] first wrote that either fission-initiated fusion bombs or 9/11 Review.com
tritium-boosted fission bombs were used.
http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2008/11/crucial-differences-in-nuclear-911.html[07.11.2010 14:45:52]
9/11 Stealth
9/11 Strike
But after finding massive, irrefutable evidence of the China 9/11 True Story
Syndrome Aftermath at the WTC for up to six months-- until the 9/11 "U"
fissioning, radioactive fragments were carted away-- and noting that the 9/11 Verses
China Syndrome can supposedly only occur from fissioning remnants, not Awoken Research Group
fusion components, the Anonymous Physicist has stated the following. The Complete 9/11 Timeline (Paul
Thompson)
alleged Tritium data release to the public may be a clever regime ploy (red Finnish 9/11 Site
herring) to get people to look for the mythical fourth generation nuke Finnish 9/11 Site in English
precisely because it is fission-free, and therefore you couldn’t have WHAT Gallerize
WE DID HAVE-- THE CHINA SYNDROME AFTERMATH at the German Engineers 9/11 site
WTC. Since the evidence of the China Syndrome of a massive heat- Hybrideb's 9/11 site
generating source existed at the WTC for months afterwards, and only Icelandic 9/11 site
fission fragments could cause this heat GENERATION for so long, the Jane Doe's 9/11 site
bombs likely were fission bombs. The Govt then deliberately released Juscogen's 9/11 site
bogus information (Tritium), as covering up the China Syndrome Aftermath Killtown
was their most crucial Op-Plan after 9/11. The China Syndrome arose, and Oil and Empire 9/11 (Mark Robinowitz)
HAD TO ARISE perforce, because a fission nuke uses only 1-6% of its Portland Indy Media 9/11
fissile material. The remainder is left over and will remain fissioning for a 119 Questions about 9/11
Let's Roll 9/11
long time, as the half-life of Uranium 235 is 700 million years. Also the
concepts of redundant nukes, "fratricided" nukes, and fizzled nukes were Essay
detailed in my papers, and all lead to a China Syndrome Aftermath. Morgan Reynolds 9/11 Commission
Essay
Furthermore, the massive disinfo efforts by the American regime, and its Missile Gate (analysis of 1st hit)
Nerdcities 9/11
agents, make clear how important it was/is to cover up the nuking, and the
Operation 9/11
China Syndrome Aftermath in NEW YORK CITY. As usual, disinfo agents
Planet Quo 9/11
try too hard. Their M.O. is often clear to see. The hangouts known as the
Official Conspiracy Theory (OCT), and “DEW” blatantly lie that there was RINF 9/11 Archive
no heat during or after WTC destruction. And another hangout (thermite) Terrorize (Danish 911 site)
has its proponent admit to the great heat for months, but must lie and claim The Mysteries of 9/11
that “thermite burns forever,” when it actually cools off in minutes or hours. THE TRUTH ABOUT SEPT 11 (Compiled
The final step, in the intel agencies’ disinformation scheme--as more and by Gerard Holmgren)
more people see the truth of the nuclear destruction of the WTC, and the Shunned
China Syndrome Aftermath-- is to plant individuals (mostly online Physics 911
Physics 9/11.co.nr
personalities) who will pretend to be pro-nuclear 9/11. All the while
Plague Puppy's Cafe
everything they write is meant to confuse, confound, and actually belittle
the nuclear 9/11 hypothesis with ludicrous or irrelevant claims. They will be
Question 911
easy to spot; they will likely never cite my research and articles on the Truth 911
nuclear destruction of the WTC, and the China Syndrome Aftermath. They Brad's 911 site
will cite the other theories above-- but not mine-- precisely because of the Club Ivy's 911 site
unchanging flaws in the others, as detailed above. So please be aware of Brad's old 9/11 site
new, allegedly nuclear 9/11 proponents who may actually try to confound Flamesong 9/11 Essay and Links
the issue; and present mis-, or dis-information, or irrelevancies, or pretend Serendipity (various essays on 9/11)
it is unknowable, or doesn’t matter. Stop the Lie 9/11
Let us now examine the first two detailed nuclear WTC destruction Total 9/11 Info
scenarios listed above. First, let us look at the Finnish military expert’s Unanswered Questions
claims of one sub-basement, pure fusion, shape-charged-like, upwardly Questions Questions
focused nuke per tower. This appears to be erroneous in several ways. The Web Fairy
Wing TV
First the observed, top-down, destruction mechanism, and the earlier,
highly likely nuclear sub-basement explosion (see more below) both belie
the one nuke per tower hypothesis. The Finn has stated that he is an 9/11 Activism
expert on shape charges, and that the top/down scenario could have been 9/11 Blogger
done via nuclear shape charges in the sub-basement. But the website that 9/11 Citizens' Watch
has his articles says that his translator refused to translate his details of 9/11 Skeptics Unite!
how this could have occurred. But even if theoretically possible, the details 911 Truth.org
of the early likely nuclear, sub-basement explosion (see below) 911 Truth LA.us
demonstrate that his one nuke per tower scenario is untenable. Likewise, 911 Truth LA.org
this Anonymous Physicist, has proposed that the hunt for the pure fusion, 911 Truth Emergence
4th generation nuke is likely a deliberate, planted red herring precisely 911 We Know
because this would obviate what did take place-- the China Syndrome 911 Truth Movement Musings
Aftermath. So I contend that the Finnish Military Expert’s hypotheses of 1.
9-11 UK
Pure fusion nuke, 2. One nuke per tower in the basement are incorrect.
The Finn also says that “red mercury” could be one way to attain fusion
NY 9/11 Truth
without prerequisite fission. This is the “red mercury” scam, that I have

shown here is physically impossible to cause fusion; and is a British Scholars for 9/11 Truth
American Regime Psyops. The Finn was given my critique of his Community Currency 9/11
hypotheses, by the owner of the site that has his nuclear scenario. There Summer of Truth
has been no word back from him to my knowledge, but I would still Proposition 911
welcome this now. Reopen 911
Deception Dollars
Next I have written what may be the only full review of Tahil’s book here. Justice for 9/11
And this should be read by all, after reading his book. Tahil deserves credit
for analyzing the USGS dust/elements study, and concluding that fission
likely occurred during the WTC destruction, and even afterwards with
Team 8 Plus
secondary fission on some of the samples. But then Tahil’s scenario entails
Flight 93 Hoax
one nuke per tower in the sub-basement again-- but here each one was a WTC Demolition
fission explosion that arose from making a large, hidden fission reactor The Ultimate Hijacker Compilation
explode like a nuclear bomb with upward focusing (as with the Finn). My 9/11 Photo Analysis
review makes clear that several aspects are untenable or improbable. First, Evidence of Explosives on 9/11
a nuclear reactor “going super-critical,” and exploding like a nuclear bomb Demolition, the Truth of 9/11 and the
is said to be physically impossible. Then the videoed, top-bottom tower WTC
destruction itself makes the one nuke per basement unlikely. Furthermore, collapse
my articles have also cited much eyewitness testimony such as from WTC Streaking Object, WTC7 theories
survivor sub-basement nuke survivor, Felipe David, and WTC Flight 77 FOIA site
Engineer Mike Pecoraro. Pecoraro was in a sub-basement level, and Flight 93 Crash.com
went UP a level to see that an earlier blast vaporized a 50 ton steel press Pentagon Research
and shriveled up a heavy concrete/steel door into foil-like matter. This Brad's Pentagon Analysis
implies a nuke went off above him, not below him, and so even if a fission Where Is Osama (The Osama Clock)
reactor could be made to go off like a nuclear bomb (which is stated to be
impossible), could the one reactor do this a second time after it would have
9/11 Flash Movies
had its first, chaotic nuclear explosion? So the actual destruction videos
and eyewitness testimony further erode some of Tahil’s (and the Finn’s)
Buddy Buddy
hypotheses. Pentagon Strike
911 Questions
Finally, numerous crucial statements Tahil wrote are incorrect. His rationale
for the massive hidden reactor hypothesis was two-fold. 1. He claims that a
fission bomb uses up 100% of its fissile material, when the correct figure is Reasonably reliable "Conspiracy Sites"
only 1-6%! and 2. Massive amounts of Strontium and other elements found that question 9/11
in the dust, he claims, could only mean that two massive fission reactors Rigorous Intuition
were already present. My review showed that Strontium occurs in concrete, Wing TV
sometimes not as a tiny component, but as a relatively large percentage, as Xymphora
is known for the concrete used in making the Empire State Building and the Killtown's Blog
Pentagon. All this taken together make his two hidden, massive, reactors
hypothesis either physically impossible (to go off as a bomb and/or to
George Washington
subsequently be re-used), unnecessary, or untenable. But again his work is
most valuable for demonstrating the likelihood that fission occurred during Prison Planet (Alex Jones)
WTC destruction, and that the China Syndrome resulted. I have had no Daily Two Minutes of Hate
communications from Tahil after my review and critique of his hypotheses. The Emperor's New Clothes
But I continue to welcome honest criticism of both my critiques of the other Public Action (Carol Valentine)
nuclear scenarios, and of my own hypotheses. Propaganda Matrix
Daniel Hopsicker
It is hoped that people will examine all the evidence (including survivors’ Cryptome
testimonies, EMP, massive heat, sound, radiation lowering methods used, Crimes and Corruptions of the New
World Order News
photos, etc.), and the Physics I have outlined, and that are archived at
these two blogs, http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com and
http://wtc-chinasyndrome.blogspot.com, and stop promoting
misinformation or disinformation. I assert this includes the “red mercury” Good Intro Books to
scam, the tritium red herring, and the latter’s implied fission-free pure Alternative 9/11 Truth
fusion hangout as well as seeing how massive hidden underground
reactors going off as nuclear bombs are improbable if not impossible-- and Questions About the Bush
don’t fit the destruction evidence, and eyewitness testimony. They are not Administration and 9/11" by David Ray
Griffin
needed when you learn the aspects of my “many small nukes” hypothesis. "The 9/11 Commission Report:
If you are truly interested in what was perpetrated on 9/11, please read the Omissions And Distortions" by David
Ray Griffin
ENTIRETY of the two blogs that contain my archived nuclear 9/11 articles,
and make up your own mind. And if you want to see just how the Official Ian Henshall
Regime “explanation” for what occurred at the WTC on 9/11/01, (and some "9/11 Synthetic Terror, Made in USA" by
of the “alternative” non-nuclear theories) used bogus science and Webster G. Tarpley
committed outright fraud, there are more articles on this at this site. Thompson

To sum up, all the evidence of the actual WTC destruction, and the great Ruppert
heat generated there for up to six months indicates that WTC destruction "Welcome to Terrorland" by Daniel
Hopsicker
was most likely caused by numerous small nuclear fission bombs (micro-
nukes), not by a single basement nuke, nor by massive hidden reactors
that exploded like nuclear bombs. The China Syndrome Aftermath arose, "Conspiracy Sites" that deal with 9/11
and had to arise, because the fission fragments were contained in the that I have significant issues with
buildings as they were nuked, and ended up all over the rubble pile, and What Really Happened
beneath the towers and WTC7. From the Wilderness (Mike Ruppert)
Arctic Beacon
It’s time to promote, or at least publicly discuss, the continual efforts made
by this Anonymous [American] Physicist to examine all the evidence of the
nuking of the WTC, and the China Syndrome Aftermath in New York City.
with 9/11
Please promote these works both on the net and to friends, family, and Break for News
neighbors. It is ABSOLUTELY THE MOST CRUCIAL ASPECT OF 911 Tom Flocco
TRUTH, TO INFORM PEOPLE THAT THE AMERICAN REGIME NUKED
ITS OWN MOST POPULOUS CITY, NYC, ON 9/11. If your favorite blog or
website ignores-- or blocks-- this most crucial aspect, either post it yourself Democratic/Progressive News Sites,
or tell all your friends, family, etc. And carefully examine the differences in Blogs and Miscellaneous Links
the nuclear 911 hypotheses, and eliminate the impossible, the improbable, Buzzflash
the untenable, or what the evidence indicated is incorrect; and promote The Raw Story
what fits all the evidence, and is physically tenable-- many small fission Democratic Underground
nukes were used to destroy the WTC on 9/11/01, and the China Syndrome Progressive Independent
Think Progress
Aftermath resulted. And the radiation issue is also discussed here.
Common Dreams
Please promote this, as there isn’t much time left before they pull away the
Consortium News
wool from everyone’s eyes. It won’t be pleasant, and must be prevented. Center for Cooperative Research
Life will not be worth living then. Remember Hiroshima. The survivors there Cursor
were said to be envious of the dead. This may be what they have planned Guerrilla News
for all of us, with the American Regime being, as Rev. Martin Luther King Online Journal
said, “the greatest purveyor of evil in the world today.” Indeed, there is The Memory Hole
much evidence that the American regime nuked its own people at least Information Clearing House
once before 9/11/01, in the Port Chicago, California incident, as I detailed Press Action
here. Thus the American regime remains the only regime that has nuked News from Babylon
its own people, as well as others, and that fact would likely enrage the Unknown News
American people to act, as nothing else might. TV News Lies
posted by spooked @ 6:58 AM Eschaton
Daily Kos
Talking Points Memo
Hullabaloo
Billmon
<< Home The Brad Blog
Jesus' General
The Rude Pundit
The Poor Man
Today in Iraq
Antiwar.com
Constant Pated
Clusterfuck Nation
Donkey Rising
Salon
Slate
My Other Blogs
Al-CIA-duh
Ghost Plane
Flight 93 Hoax


Peak Oil and

Oil and Gas
The Oil Drum
Land of Black Gold
Richard Heinberg
Grist

Conspiracy Theory!
World Trade Center Demolition: On the Issue of Nuclear Demolition of the WTC and Radiation, from "Anonymous Physicist"

Wednesday, June 06, 2007 trade center buildings 1, 2
On the Issue of Nuclear Demolition of the WTC and demolition.
Radiation, from "Anonymous Physicist"
The “anonymous physicist” has this to say on the issue of radiation during About Me
and after the WTC nuclear demolition. We must dispense with any naiveté Name: spooked
on this important issue. If the EPA and Whitman had found massive Location: United States
radiation and/or radionuclides (radioactive/decaying elements) at the WTC
after 9/11, does anyone believe they would ever release this data to the The official 9/11 story is a lie. The 9/11 plane
people? Relatedly, it later became known that they found high levels of hijackings and crashes were clever hoaxes. The
(asbestos, mercury and other) toxins shortly after 9/11, and yet told the WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7 towers were brought
world, and the responders, that “the “air was safe.” They lied, for quite down by demolition, and there is evidence for the
some time, about what they had found in this sense. Now if the EPA tested use of small nuclear bombs in the demolition of
for, and found, significant radiation, and/or radionuclides, and failed to tell WTC1 and 2. All in all, 9/11 was a massive and
the responders this; it resulted in the responders not wearing radiation- cruel hoax foisted upon the world, done in order
shielding, protective clothing. This would then likely lead to cancer and to spark the obscene "war on terror", to cover up
other illnesses. I note that there has been cancers, in 9/11 responders, and financial fraud and to further the ends of the
people living nearby; and asbestos is known to usually take far longer for global elite. 9/11 was only the most egregious of
its victims to get cancer. Could these cancers be the result of radiation? several other recent false-flag terror operations.
Cancer can be caused by even the very lowest levels of radiation. The
father of the field of health physics, Dr. Karl Ziegler Morgan, has so stated. View my complete profile
The EPA officials and Whitman would be liable for charges of mass murder
and treason, just for this cover-up. Also if the government perpetrated 9/11 More 9/11 Links (Note: I present a wide
(and no one else could), would they allow another section of the variety of 9/11 sites here for the
government to give it all away? Do not the people know how the purposes of diversity. I leave it up to
government lies, in perpetuity, about the Pearl Harbor set-up, the Kennedy you to judge their content.)
assassination, and many more nefarious deeds it has perpetrated?
In a similar vein, is anyone foolish enough to trust a certain physicist’s General 9/11 Sites
alleged data on his tests of a single steel beam and a friend’s apartment? 9/11 Blimp
This is the same physicist whose alleged data shot down the whole field of 9/11 Busters
cold fusion, which might have, by now, obviated some of the need for oil, if 9/11 CGI Watch
this field wasn’t shot down? Could his “data” on cold fusion have been
9/11 Complicity
accurate if many scientists around the world (who aren’t govt disinfo
9/11 Cover-Up
agents) continue to publish data showing that cold fusion works? When
9/11 Dossier (UK)
this same physicist tries to shoot down the fact that mini-nukes were used
to demolish the twin towers, he rightly knows that he has to address the 9/11 Encyclopedia
issue of the evidence of EMPs (Electromagnetic Pulses). But he barely 9/11 Foreknowledge
mentions it, and simply says that other factors could have caused the 9/11 Hoax
power outages. No mention of the toasted cars--and not people or paper
9/11 Oddities
right next to them. See Ondrovic’s statements already alluded to by me.
Read how she was knocked down by the car door right next to her 9/11 Overview
overheating from the EMP and exploding off the car and hitting her. Note
9/11 Plot
that nothing heated her up directly (which also eliminates DEWs). That
9/11 Proof
physicist knows well that there is no other explanation for these events,
except EMP, so he does not include this evidence of the toasted cars or 9/11 Resources
Ondrovic’ eyewitness (heavily redacted) testimony. No one knows better 9/11 Review.org
than that nuclear physicist that nukes were indeed used to kill nearly 3,000 9/11 Review.com
people on 9/11. That is why his statements are replete with omissions, and
http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2007/06/on-issue-of-nuclear-demolition-of-wtc.html[07.11.2010 14:46:41]
9/11 Stealth
other falsifications not worthy of a complete rebuttal. Except to say one last 9/11 Strike
thing. When he mentions the high temperatures and molten steel, at the 9/11 True Story
WTC, he bogusly writes about this as if this occurred only during the 9/11 "U"
demolition or just shortly thereafter. He ignores (as he must) the fact that 9/11 Verses
flowing molten steel, and extremely high temperatures were found days, Awoken Research Group
weeks and months after 9/11. Does anyone believe his beloved, bogus Complete 9/11 Timeline (Paul
Thompson)
thermite was still generating massive heat days, weeks and months later? Finnish 9/11 Site
Any heat generated by thermite would have been gone minutes or hours Finnish 9/11 Site in English
after the event. Indeed, the heat from the mini-nukes themselves would Gallerize
also have dissipated within a short period of time. There are no reports of German Engineers 9/11 site
molten, flowing metal or high temperatures days, weeks or months after the Hybrideb's 9/11 site
events of Hiroshima or Nagasaki. This is why I had to propose another Icelandic 9/11 site
cause for this in my nuclear demolition article, other than the nuclear Jane Doe's 9/11 site
bombs themselves. And also why I included Tahil’s website as his is the Juscogen's 9/11 site
only other explanation released about a possible source that could have Killtown
generated high heat days, weeks and months afterwards. And I think my Oil and Empire 9/11 (Mark Robinowitz)
hypothesis of undetonated “extra” nukes impacted by the exploding nukes Portland Indy Media 9/11
and going somewhat critical, is far more likely than his theory of two 119 Questions about 9/11
Let's Roll 9/11
underground nuclear reactors having been surreptitiously built. But his
reference was included by me, as it is not impossible. And someone Essay
interested in the truth includes other theories and other facts, and does not Morgan Reynolds 9/11 Commission
try to cleverly suppress them. Essay
Nerdcities 9/11
Operation 9/11
Planet Quo 9/11
Also regarding the radiation issue, in this abstract of an article, a
scientist, in 1969, published the following, “Nuclear device characteristics RINF 9/11 Archive
and the factors affecting radionuclide production and distribution are Terrorize (Danish 911 site)
described along with some recent nuclear experiments conducted by the U. The Mysteries of 9/11
S. Atomic Energy Commission for the purpose of providing technical data THE TRUTH ABOUT SEPT 11 (Compiled
on cratering mechanisms and special emplacement techniques which could by Gerard Holmgren)
minimize the release of radioactivity to the atmosphere.” This shows, even Shunned
back in 1969, that the govt experimented with using nukes to construct Physics 911
Physics 9/11.co.nr
canals. It shows that they worked on having nukes with blast effect, and
Plague Puppy's Cafe
little or no radioactive elements created. The article’s abstract hints at two
methods for obviating atmospheric release of radioactivity. 1. Steering the
Question 911
device towards low radionuclide production and 2. "special emplacement Truth 911
techniques" which means place it where you won't get much or any Brad's 911 site
radiation released into the air. As this was back in 1969, they likely have Club Ivy's 911 site
perfected very low (or no) radiation nukes. There should be better, more Brad's old 9/11 site
recent articles on this topic, but I didn't find any so far. Maybe I know why?! Flamesong 9/11 Essay and Links
Could it be because they perfected this, and classified this, as they knew Serendipity (various essays on 9/11)
they would be using this on the “home front,” such as on 9/11? Could small Stop the Lie 9/11
nukes to be used for “construction,” have morphed into nukes used for The Strange Images of 9/11/2001
“destruction?” Total 9/11 Info
Regarding 9/11, never forget that whatever radionuclides may have been Questions Questions
created were sent to China, or otherwise were not allowed to be studied. The Web Fairy
Wing TV
This remarkable article states that before the steel was shipped to China,
it was "first sent to be washed down"— a standard method
of decreasing radiation levels! This article also has a top secret 9/11 Activism
demolition expert/geologist saying that even the 1993 WTC bomb was a 9/11 Blogger
nuke, and they wanted him to be in charge of "better" nuking of the WTC in 9/11 Citizens' Watch
the future, and he refused! In this light, I always thought it strange that the 9/11 Skeptics Unite!
govt basically admitted that they were the ones to use actual explosive in 911 Truth.org
1993 WTC hit. They even had a TV movie made depicting this. Do you 911 Truth LA.us
recall how their inside man, an Egyptian agent, worked with the FBI? When 911 Truth LA.org
he allegedly asked the FBI to switch to a non-exploding dud, the FBI 911 Truth Emergence
allegedly told him to use the actual explosive! Why weren’t these FBI 911 We Know
agents charged? Why would the FBI/govt admit to this malfeasance? Now 911 Truth Movement Musings
it makes sense-- whenever the regime admits to something really bad, it's
9-11 UK
usually because the truth is vastly worse still! The same demolition expert
said of the 1993 nuke— after he examined the basement of that tower:
NY 9/11 Truth
"The particular type of construction type micronuclear device is mostly

radiologically clean." So, as I indicated in my WTC nuclear demolition Scholars for 9/11 Truth
article, recent nuclear devices can be designed to be “steered” towards Community Currency 9/11
blast capability, and away from any (significant) radiation release. Summer of Truth
Proposition 911
For completeness, I note that if there was significant radioactivity released, Reopen 911
some such elements have short lives both in terms of time and distance. Deception Dollars
Few, if any "citizens" right there had Geiger counters, most of which have Justice for 9/11
serious limitations. These nukes went off basically inside steel boxes. The
government’s own study found significant levels of tritium (a signature of a
fusion device, and according to Tahil, if he is honest, even end-products of
Team 8 Plus
fission were found). But the govt study notes that they were “unable” to test
Flight 93 Hoax
at numerous places— but especially deep underground, which was where WTC Demolition
the high temperatures and molten steel were observed! Of course, there is The Ultimate Hijacker Compilation
the possibility (since this is the govt), that they did test at these places, and 9/11 Photo Analysis
discarded anything that would have proved the case for mini-nukes. With Evidence of Explosives on 9/11
other government “investigations,” whistle-blowers have revealed that often Demolition, the Truth of 9/11 and the
there is much evidence, but it is eliminated. Sometimes absolute proof of WTC
nefarious deeds by govt elements is sent to Congress, and they collapse
immediately "LOSE" it. The govt has apparently used the most horrific WTC Streaking Object, WTC7 theories
methods to silence a FEMA photographer (Sonnenfeld), one of only Flight 77 FOIA site
two people, the govt allowed to video the WTC site. Flight 93 Crash.com
Pentagon Research
The bottom line is that the govt is known to have created Where Is Osama (The Osama Clock)
construction/destruction mini-nukes that likely produce little radiation or
radionuclides. The govt’s own WTC study admitted to finding tritium (with a
9/11 Flash Movies
laughable explanation of its possible source) and other elements that could
have been from a fusion (or even a fission device according to Tahil). The
Buddy Buddy
local govt leader (Giuliani) colluded with the federal perpetrators to cart off Pentagon Strike
the evidence including building components and people’s remains, and 911 Questions
disallowed their examination which clearly is obstruction of justice, but
which prevented proper radiation studies—except apparently later for one
steel beam. Was the latter chosen carefully, if you know what I mean? This Reasonably reliable "Conspiracy Sites"
govt has repeatedly proven that it would never release any data that would that question 9/11
be complete proof that could lead to the prosecution—for mass murder and Rigorous Intuition
high treason here—of its officials all the way to the top…whoever that Wing TV
really is. Xymphora
Killtown's Blog
George Washington
<< Home Daily Two Minutes of Hate
Propaganda Matrix
Daniel Hopsicker
Cryptome
World Order News
Good Intro Books to

Griffin
Ray Griffin
Ian Henshall
Webster G. Tarpley
Thompson

Ruppert
Hopsicker

Arctic Beacon

with 9/11
Break for News
Tom Flocco

Buzzflash
The Raw Story
Think Progress
Common Dreams
Consortium News
Cursor
Guerrilla News
Online Journal
The Memory Hole
Press Action
News from Babylon
Unknown News
TV News Lies
Eschaton
Daily Kos
Talking Points Memo
Hullabaloo
Billmon
The Brad Blog
Jesus' General
The Rude Pundit
The Poor Man
Today in Iraq
Antiwar.com
Constant Pated
Clusterfuck Nation
Donkey Rising
Salon
Slate
My Other Blogs
Al-CIA-duh
Ghost Plane
Flight 93 Hoax


Peak Oil and

Oil and Gas
The Oil Drum
Land of Black Gold
Richard Heinberg
Grist

Conspiracy Theory!
World Trade Center Demolition: WTC Nuke Thesis from "Anonymous Physicist"

Tuesday, May 29, 2007 trade center buildings 1, 2
WTC Nuke Thesis from "Anonymous Physicist" demolition.
About Me
Name: spooked

WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7 towers were brought
down by demolition, and there is evidence for the
use of small nuclear bombs in the demolition of
WTC1 and 2. All in all, 9/11 was a massive and
cruel hoax foisted upon the world, done in order
to spark the obscene "war on terror", to cover up
financial fraud and to further the ends of the

purposes of diversity. I leave it up to
General 9/11 Sites

The “anonymous physicist” has new ideas on the nuclear demolition of the
9/11 Blimp
towers of the WTC. In destroying the World Trade Center on 9/11/01, the
9/11 Busters
U.S. regime (and those who control it) once again wanted to employ a plan
9/11 CGI Watch
that allowed for their coveted “plausible deniability.” As an aside, the 9/11 Closeup (Gerard Holmgren)
plausibility is usually for the American masses. Anyone who is able to think 9/11 Complicity
and change usually has more than enough clues to get pretty far into the 9/11 Cover-Up
truth. Now only nuclear devices and their concomitant EMPs fit all the 9/11 Dossier (UK)
evidence—along with conventional explosives used in a subordinate
9/11 Encyclopedia
manner. But this ultimate truth must be hidden. Just as the regime still
hides the likelihood that it nuked its own sailors in the Port 9/11 Foreknowledge
Chicago explosion in 1944. 9/11 Hoax
9/11 Oddities
9/11 Overview
The "Powers That Be" (PTB) knew the “plausible” ruse that they would put 9/11 Oz (Australian)
out. It would be the pseudo free fall time for the bogus 9/11 Plot
planes/fuel/gravity/pancake hypothesis. The perps desired that WTC1 and 9/11 Proof
2 have top-down “collapses” to go along with the bogus plane hits. The 9/11 Research (Jim Hoffman)
PTB also always have their disinfo agents waiting in the wings to come out 9/11 Resources
when enough people see that the official ruse is NOT plausible. 9/11 Review.org
9/11 Review.com
http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2007/05/wtc-nuke-thesis-from-anonymous.html[07.11.2010 14:47:39]
With the analogous JFK assassination, when enough people saw that the 9/11 Stealth
patsy Oswald (himself CIA/ONI) could not be the culprit shooting from 9/11 Strike
behind, as the fatal shot was from the front; the PTB put out a "Babel" of 9/11 True Story
CONTROLLED alternatives: Mafia, LBJ, Cubans, Grassy Knoll, rogue 9/11 "U"
elements, etc (some of which were involved). All of that was to hide the 9/11 Verses
horrifying, ultimate truth that the alleged government protector did it—- as Awoken Research Group
has been discussed by Spooked previously. Thompson)
Finnish 9/11 Site
With 9/11, the Babel of planes/fuel/gravity, thermite/thermate [etc.], DEW, Finnish 9/11 Site in English
car bombs in the basement, and surely more to come, was waiting when a Gallerize
critical mass of people rejected the (always) ludicrous, official, German Engineers 9/11 site
“investigation” conclusion. The massive, rapid outward—as well Hybrideb's 9/11 site
as downward and upward—explosions of the two towers, Icelandic 9/11 site
the toasted cars (but not paper), and popping ceiling lights Jane Doe's 9/11 site
(Ondrovic—see below), the micron-sized dustification of Juscogen's 9/11 site
tower contents, the levels of tritium and heavy metals, the Killtown
underground molten steel and high temperatures weeks and
months later, all can only be accounted for by nuclear
devices and their EMPs. The fact that the explosions are
Let's Roll 9/11
simultaneously outward, downward and upwards means we Morgan Reynolds WTC Demolition
have a spherical blast wave, such as occurs with a nuclear Essay
device. Morgan Reynolds 9/11 Commission
Essay
Nerdcities 9/11
The anonymous Finnish military expert—- to whom all real 9/11 truth Operation 9/11
seekers are indebted—- appears to believe that only one fusion Planet Quo 9/11
device in the 1-kiloton range was used in each tower. This Rick Siegel (9/11 Eyewitness)
may be so, but it should be debated. I believe the evidence RINF 9/11 Archive
indicates several fusion bombs went off during the Terrorize (Danish 911 site)
destruction of the two towers. The Mysteries of 9/11
by Gerard Holmgren)
In fact, the dimensions of the towers likely required several nukes. The
Shunned
towers are much taller than their other two dimensions. A single large
Physics 911
nuclear, spherical blast wave large enough to destroy a tower's complete
Physics 9/11.co.nr
height would have been too powerful to be contained in its other two Plague Puppy's Cafe
dimensions. The results would have been seen and (more) catastrophic. Plague Puppy: Alternate Site
So several smaller nukes likely were needed, and used. I believe also that Question 911
there is much evidence that WTC 3, 4, 5, 6 also were taken down with Truth 911
internal nuclear devices. Brad's 911 site
Club Ivy's 911 site
WTC7 appears to have been imploded with conventional demolition Brad's old 9/11 site
methods as videos show no concomitant vaporization, nor massive chunks Flamesong 9/11 Essay and Links
expelled outwards during “collapse,” nor any internal spherical holes as in Serendipity (various essays on 9/11)
WTC6 and WTC3 (in between the “collapses” of the two towers). Stop the Lie 9/11
Total 9/11 Info
Questions Questions
The Web Fairy
Wing TV
9/11 Activism
9/11 Blogger
911 Truth.org
911 Truth LA.us
911 Truth LA.org
911 Truth Emergence
911 We Know
9-11 UK
NY 9/11 Truth

Summer of Truth
Proposition 911
Reopen 911
Deception Dollars
Justice for 9/11
Accurate analysis may forever only be possible by the perps themselves.

This is because of many factors including the immense variation in the 9/11 Specialty Sites
possible power, number, and type of nuclear devices used, false evidence Team 8 Plus
Flight 93 Hoax
(doctored videos, photos, witnesses, media, government reports),
WTC Demolition
complexity of a nuclear explosion, inclusion of non-nuke elements in the
“collapses” etc. For completeness, I note that William Tahil, a
9/11 Photo Analysis
technology consultant, claims that his research leads to the Evidence of Explosives on 9/11
conclusion that each tower had a nuclear fission reactor Demolition, the Truth of 9/11 and the
underneath it that was forced to criticality. He has a free WTC
summary, and offers a full report (for purchase) that I have not read. 9/11 and the Impossible: the WTC
collapse
In initiating discussion of the possible details of the nuclear devices used Flight 77 FOIA site
on 9/11, I note that the number and energy release of these devices are Flight 93 Crash.com
perhaps the most relevant parameters. Spooked has published Pentagon Research
government documentation of nukes as small as just pounds Brad's Pentagon Analysis
of TNT, or about a millionth of a kiloton. Where Is Osama (The Osama Clock)
I go along with the Finnish expert that fission-free fusion devices were
likely used. The Finnish expert states that a 1 kiloton (TNT equivalent) 9/11 Flash Movies
basement fusion device was used on each tower. I believe that a total of 9/11 chronology (network footage)
Buddy Buddy
1/10th of that amount was more than sufficient, including the power needed
Pentagon Strike
for vaporization/dustification of each tower’s contents. I believe this 1/10th
911 Questions
kt total energy per tower occurred in several blasts (per tower), and in just
one per other WTC buildings (possibly 3, 4, 5, 6). I believe that WTC7 did
not have a nuclear device used during “collapse,” but could have had one Reasonably reliable "Conspiracy Sites"
just afterwards to vaporize evidence as all the federal alphabet agencies that question 9/11
were in that building, and it would have been a likely planning/command Rigorous Intuition
center for 9/11 with a lot of evidence to definitively “lose.” Wing TV
Xymphora
Killtown's Blog
What would have been the right range of energy for the desired events The Bulldog Manifesto
while maintaining “plausible deniability?” Or the illusion of that-- many Center for an Informed America
people go into a deep state of denial, just begging for any ludicrous “big George Washington
lie” from their government (as Hitler noted). Too large a nuke and you
would instantly vaporize the towers and maybe surrounding areas (and
lose the bogus gravity/pancake theory). Too small a nuke and you wouldn’t
have “shock and awe,” nor insure total (pseudo free fall) collapse and Public Action (Carol Valentine)
vaporization of the buildings’ contents which was apparently desired—- Propaganda Matrix
always destroy the evidence, and kill the witnesses. This was apparently Daniel Hopsicker
aided by the taking of much (radioactive?) material by China—- a Cryptome
supposed adversary—but another indication of the actual, global control of Crimes and Corruptions of the New
the PTB. Other material including human remains went into road pavement. World Order News
Was all this, including the human remains, radioactive? Covert 2 Overt Analysis
The fission devices that went off at the Trinity/Alamogordo site, and Good Intro Books to
Hiroshima and Nagasaki were said to be of the order of 10-20 kilotons of Alternative 9/11 Truth
TNT. Such devices yield great fluxes of neutrons and gamma rays. Also
resultant are air pressure blasts, and tremendous heat of the order of 100 Questions About the Bush
million degrees. Modern devices are “steerable” in terms of desired Administration and 9/11" by David Ray
Griffin
percentages of these output parameters. The “radius of total destruction” in
Hiroshima and Nagasaki was about one mile in each city. Total destruction Omissions And Distortions" by David
includes vaporization of buildings and people nearer to the hypocenter or Ray Griffin
ground zero. The fate of buildings and people near the hypocenter of a Ian Henshall
nuclear device is indicated by this: “The Shima hospital, the "9/11 Synthetic Terror, Made in USA" by
hypocenter of the [Hiroshima] atomic bomb was vaporized, Webster G. Tarpley
along with all her patients.” Farther away from the hypocenter, the "The Terror Timeline" by Paul
Thompson
so-called shadow people left their shadows on buildings as the people "Crossing the Rubicon" by Michael C.
vaporized, but not the buildings. Other people still further away, but not Ruppert
vaporized, were left in a charred condition. Farther away still, survivors had "Welcome to Terrorland" by Daniel
Hopsicker
burned, or torn away skin. Are all these reasons why we are not allowed to
see any photos of any human remains from 9/11? We cannot expect every
single, murdered person to have been completely vaporized. Photos of "Conspiracy Sites" that deal with 9/11
body parts in morgues have also not been allowed to be seen by the that I have significant issues with
public. Indeed EMT Patricia Ondrovic has seen the body parts in the city What Really Happened
morgue. Is this part of the redactions to her statement? From the Wilderness (Mike Ruppert)
Arctic Beacon
Returning to the parameters of the nukes of 9/11, given the energy, the
destruction radius and other parameters of Hiroshima and its comparison
with 9/11
to WTC1 or 2, the Finnish expert concluded that a single 1-kiloton,
Break for News
underground nuke was used. I conclude that likely several nukes per tower
Tom Flocco
were used—- but totaling 1/10th of a kiloton per tower. One key in my
analysis is the number of times we suddenly see massive chunks of
building expelled outwards like the trajectories of large chunks of earth Democratic/Progressive News Sites,
seen in (above-ground) photos of underground test nukes. Remember Blogs and Miscellaneous Links
WTC 1 and 2 destruction events look more like the Nevada nuclear tests Buzzflash
than the Hiroshima bomb. This video even appears to show a central The Raw Story
mushroom cloud at the end of it. The similarity to underground test nukes Democratic Underground
means that any and all nukes were set off at least several floors below any Progressive Independent
extant levels. A nuke per floor was not needed or desired. Rather I see this Think Progress
tremendous outward exploding of large chunks of WTC 1 and 2, about two Citizens for a Legitimate Government
or three times per tower. But remember, what we see is soon obscured by Common Dreams
Consortium News
dust/debris, and that other buildings also prevent us from seeing much of
the bottom half of each tower’s destruction. In discussing this aspect, it is
Cursor
important to realize I write now of powerful outward explosions of massive
Guerrilla News
chunks—- often appearing to emanate from the center which indeed was Online Journal
the likely location of the nuke(s). These outward explosions need to be The Memory Hole
distinguished from the “peeling away”—- and then falling-- of the outer Information Clearing House
structure (sometimes in very large chunks) of the towers. IMO, this peeling Press Action
away occurred because there no longer was any inside structure at that News from Babylon
level at that time! (The remaining, succeeding, inside top portions looked Unknown News
like the final photos of the inside of WTC6.) There would still be some TV News Lies
outward-vectored force all along the outer structure at all times due to heat After Downing Street
and over-pressure inside, causing the peeling-away of the outer structure Eschaton
observed. But I refer to the large chunks that suddenly were flung to great Daily Kos
distances. The videos seem to indicate that this happened 2-3 times per Talking Points Memo
tower, and again we do not see most of the bottom half. Hullabaloo
Billmon
The Brad Blog
However I note that the well-known collapse/vaporization of the
Jesus' General
remaining steel core after WTC1 fell is seen at the same
The Rude Pundit
time that we see the so-called “nuclear glow.” Notice how this The Poor Man
glow from the WTC1 (nuclear) demolition (seen on the left side) causes the

whole background to brighten at one point, and then how the camera is Today in Iraq
panned to the right so as to no longer video what they were showing in the Antiwar.com
first place! Was this a “cleaner nuke”—see below—inadvertently captured Iraq Coalition Casualties
because there was no building to contain it? Again it would be good (from Constant Pated
the perps’ viewpoint) to vaporize any remaining people and building Clusterfuck Nation
contents (evidence) just after final “collapse.” So I believe about 4-6 nukes Donkey Rising
per tower were used. Each one would have a radius of about 10-15 floors, Salon
or a diameter of about 20-30 floors. Nukes would be placed strategically Slate
(centrally?) to try to vaporize the strong 47 beam steel core—- the sturdiest
and most heat-resistant part of the towers’ structure—- and therefore likely
My Other Blogs
the last to get vaporized. However I now make the assertion that Humint Events Online
completely doing away with the 47 beam steel support core was not THE WORST PRESIDENT EVER!!!!
necessary! Why? With a nuclear device that vaporizes most of the inside Bush Administration War Criminals
[which will soon be micro-particles floating around outside], there would be Fake Opposition Democrats
little left of the inside to need support! While preferable to do away with as Al-CIA-duh
much of this 47 steel beam support as possible without “over-nuking” Ghost Plane
everything, it was therefore not essential for its entirety to be vaporized. Flight 93 Hoax
Indeed we may see that some of this support--up to about the 60th floor
(the "spire")-- remained after “collapse” of WTC1-- and was then itself likely
nuked/vaporized, during the “nuclear glow”. Why was there a need to
vaporize the left-over support beams? Because, as my argument above
asserts, 100% obliteration of these beams is more necessary for the bogus
“collapse” mechanism, than for the actual, nuclear destruction mechanism!
The perps would want maximum use of each nuke for its full diameter. Pre-
planted conventional explosives (thermite/thermate/other, or very tiny
nukes) were used to initiate each tower’s visible collapse, at the
appropriate floor (where earlier conventional, shape charges had simulated
plane dimensions, and provided initial shock and awe in their fireballs)—-
for public consumption. A properly, pre-placed nuke subsequently went off
in each top part, centered in each separated top part after initial demolition
began at the appropriate floor. Remember the floors that were “hit” were in
fact just exploded as part of the plan, so nukes were pre-placed in the
centers of the pre-known dimensions of the top tower parts for their
subsequent vaporization. These nukes and top vaporizations were initiated
shortly after the demolitions began at the “plane-hit” levels. This could
explain the kinking noted by Spooked in the WTC2 top corner.
The nuke has caused some loss of integrity (from neutrons or even direct
heat) in the structure at that point (and other less visible points), shortly
before vaporization. Kinking is also a sign of wave interference as wave
energy builds up at corners, and the kink is near a corner. The fact that
there was a 30 story part of the tower that was tilted and about to fall
“badly” is part of the “beauty” of the nuking of the towers (from the perps’
viewpoint). This was not likely supposed to happen. But they simply Interesting Mainstream Articles on 9/11
vaporized their error! This is also analogous to the dipping of the Boston Globe 11/23/01 piece
radio tower of WTC1 before the top piece accordions into Flight 93 and New Baltimore piece
itself, then vaporizes. Flight 93 article and picture gallery
The radio tower is in the center, and a centrally placed nuke’s spherical Miscellaneous Items of Interest
blast wave (causing loss of structural integrity) will reach a point directly CNN infiltrated by US Army Psy-ops
above it before it would reach all around the building to start the US National Debt Clock
“accordioning” of the entire visible circumferences. This is part of what I call The American Taliban
the inside/out effect which occurred along with the top/down effect. Now the
two tower tops had vertical lengths of about 18 and 30 floors, not counting
the radio tower (very little of which was found at Ground Zero, like a great Peak Oil and
deal of the towers). A key factor is that the nukes (not counting any Sustainability/Environmental Sites
underground ones) are always several floors beneath remaining building Oil and Gas
levels when they go off. Otherwise—if the nuke was at the surface of the The Oil Drum
remaining building at that time—- building parts would have been expelled Land of Black Gold
to great distances, perhaps many miles away. Also we might have seen Flying Talking Donkey
more visual evidence of the nuking. Perhaps this is consistent with the Life After the Oil Crash
“nuclear glow” seen at the end of WTC1 “collapse”, as there was little or no Richard Heinberg
building left (only debris clouds) at that time to obscure this. Was the glow Grist
from a final nuke that also collapsed/vaporized the remaining/standing steel

core? A decision as to whether, or not, to use more nukes towards the end The Official 9/11 Story IS a
Conspiracy Theory!
of each tower’s destruction—- when smoke and debris would shield the
state of the remaining building could have been facilitated by helicopters,
planes, even satellites overhead, which could have scanned the site—- 9/11 was a conspiracy, as it involved several
using wavelengths that see through smoke—- and directed more nuclear 9/11 narrative, as codified by the 9/11
(or conventional?) explosions (especially at the lower levels or ground), as Commission Report, is NOT proven as the most
needed. official 9/11 story is therefore a theory. This
Because there was no plane crash excuse for WTC 3, 4, 5, and 6,

probably “underpowered nukes” were used inside these buildings. WTC 4, Statement of Principles
5, and 6 were each 7-9 stories high. The PTB wanted to claim that these I have no fondness for any religion, as I think it
edifices were damaged by falling parts of the two towers. So these makes people do extreme and violent things.
buildings were not vaporized in near total fashion, as were the two towers. much as I detest the true perpetrators of 9/11.
Their outer shells were left over. But the large, nearly, spherical hole in Most likely Islamic terrorists were used as
WTC6, and its deep underground hole, are indications of a likely internal, covert operation by a group affiliated with the US
nuclear spherical blast. In particular, I think that on-scene, EMT,
Patricia Ondrovic’s statements to Killtown and her heavily
redacted interview with the WTC task force indicate that she
saw—- right next to her—- EMP [Electromagnetic Pulse] effects from a
nuke set off in or near WTC6. I refer to her observations of ceiling lights
popping in the lobby of WTC6, and the cars just outside catching fire at this
same time. Indeed the EMP-induced heat on one car door near her,
caused it to rapidly expand and explode off the vehicle and hit her. Her
interviews indicate that the overheard, commencing, rumbling collapse of
WTC2 (further away from her) occurred just as she saw WTC5 and 6 start
to explode (”collapse”) right near her. The timing Ondrovic states here
indicates that WTC2, WTC5, and WTC6 had nukes go off inside each one
simultaneously. Fortunately for her, as I noted above, these (WTC 5, 6)
explosions were “underpowered,” and left much outer structure standing,
and she was far enough away from WTC2 to be able to run away from the
area and survive.
WTC7, the possible planning/command center with its plethora of federal

agents, was special. No nukes, at least not above ground. I suggest that it
was NOT a faux pas that Silverstein, on public TV, admitted they “pulled it”
with conventional demolition! But the regime tried to “take it back” when a
public outcry began over that admission!
WTC3, the 22-story Marriott Hotel, may have also had a nuke vaporize
most of its top floors, or this one may have been destroyed by falling
debris? Let us analyze this. A picture of WTC3 after the first WTC2
collapse, but before WTC1 collapse, indicates WTC3 had its own
“underpowered” internal nuclear spherical blast wave damage it, a la
WTC6:
The final state of WTC3 reveals about three floors remaining and does not
show the massive parts of WTC2 that allegedly fell on WTC3:
Did the nukes going off in WTC 2 vaporize these chunks before they hit
WTC3? Did the nukes of WTC1 cause the outer shell of WTC3 to later
vaporize? Did after-collapse nukes do this? Should we call these “cleaner
nukes” in analogy to how the regime sends in its “cleaners” to remove
evidence after one of their agents has performed some nefarious deed?
Now I must include some related and important issues. Were deep
underground nukes set off a few seconds before the start of
visible “collapse” as audio and video indicates? Included herein
is the supposed vaporization of the underground 50 ton steel press. Some
of the testimony on this however comes from William Rodriguez who I
cannot trust because of his apparent deep background. He was a
TV magician cum janitor cum press agent cum janitor—cum hero! And he
was not in his usual place (high up) at his usual time that morning.
What happens if a large flux of neutrons, gamma rays, pressure, heat etc.
reaches another, unexploded mini-nuke? Will the latter still go off
somewhat as planned—- i.e., have its own chain reaction-- or will it fizzle? If
it goes off, what percentage of its maximum potential will be realized?
Would it at least be interfered with and compromised, probably to a
significant level? Or could it have been sufficiently shielded? Is it not likely
that only non-interfered, or “virgin” nukes would be used? The perps would
want to have things go as much as possible exactly the way they want.
This would be unlike conventional charges which could have one trigger
the next etc. I would imagine that the placement of mini-nukes would be
such that one would be out of the range of affecting the next one. But I
cannot know this for sure. But this is what I have assumed in this
discussion.
However we need to examine this matter of “left-over” nukes that may

have been “compromised.” What if some nukes, maybe even one or more
final “cleaner nuke(s)” destroyed the integrity of the shielding of “left-over”
nukes? It is indeed possible that sub-critical components subsequently
interacted and would then release significant energy for some time! They
could well act like the nuclear reactor proposed by William Tahil (above).
This idea seems to be far more likely (and feasible) than his hypothesis
that the perps had surreptitiously built two underground nuclear reactors
there. One or more compromised nuclear fusion (or possibly even fission—
if Tahil’s take on the government’s report is correct)—- bombs, with their
sub-critical, but now interacting, components releasing significant amounts
of energy and heat at their locale(s) could indeed be responsible for the
high temperatures (and molten steel) seen at the WTC weeks and months
after 9/11. This also dovetails with reports of “unexploded micro-nukes”
being removed from the Oklahoma City bombing by federal agents—after
being placed there and used by other federal agents! Bill Deagle, M.D. has
reported that one military agent, and patient of his, told him: “We
removed two undetonated softball sized micronuclear
bombs [from the Murrah building].”
Perhaps even the “nuclear glow” seen in the CNN footage—which I note is
sustained for some time, as the camera pans away from it—- is the
initiation of a nuclear reactor-like event (caused by a “cleaner nuke” or
earlier demolition nuke, or even conventional explosives) and undergoing a
limited criticality event like the “tickling the dragon’s tail”
experiments—performed at Los Alamos. Massive visible blue light
emission (as well as neutrons and gamma rays) resulted when criticality
was attained in this limited fashion. I believe that with all the other materials
exploding, some could even have acted as “control rods” yielding a
sustained, pseudo-nuclear reactor. And there could have been several
unexploded nukes “left-over” in each tower. Or even a single nuclear
device could have had its components blasted to several locales. But never
forget, the massive heat released when a nuclear reactor goes awry is why
they called it the “China Syndrome.” The heat released (in theory) could
melt all the way down to China!
The above discussion of possible interactions of pre-planted, mini-nukes

leads to the matter of the outer structure demolition. With this aspect, there
may well have been interacting conventional (or other) explosives. But
before we delve into this, it must be noted that what occurred, or was
observed, in this regard was likely done for public consumption. What
happened inside was not directly observed—- with the possible exception
of some events like the “nuclear glow” that shone through. We must also
realize that the videos and photos promulgated of the outer destruction of
the two towers may be as doctored, as are nearly all the videos of the two
alleged “plane hits.” The regime wanted to make it “plausible” that a rapid,
pseudo-free fall, pancaking occurred. People who have analyzed the public
videos of WTC 1 and 2 outer structure “collapses”/demolitions report a 10
floor per second “collapse.” This is presumably for that first second. I note
that this is much faster than simple, gravitational collapse would allow in
that first second (16 feet.) After the initial “collapse” has started, dust and
debris and other buildings soon obscure things. Those right there videoing
had to stop and leave as fast as they could. But if the times for total
collapse of the towers are about 10 or 11 seconds, and we have about 100
floors involved (as I am not counting separated top parts of the towers
which seem to be disappearing shortly after initiation of final events.) Thus
we apparently have an approximately constant outer floor demolition rate of
about 10 floors downward per second throughout.
We need to examine the possible mechanisms for this and how this outer
structure demolition dovetails with the inner, nuclear demolition hypothesis.
Were pre-planted conventional (or even tinier nukes?) used to blow out the
(visible) outer structure of each floor while the inside was being vaporized
with nukes? Did these presumably outer building conventional explosives
interact with each other, or the nukes? One possibility is that an explosive
in the outer structure of the floor above reached, and then triggered, the
explosive in the outer structure of the floor just below it, and so on. Could
these charges have been placed in or at the outer structure soon before
9/11/01, or even when the buildings were erected–- for those who know
“ultimate truths”? There are so many possibilities—- including a visible (yet
“disconnected”) “standard” demolition for the outer structure. But always
remember, my central hypothesis here is that the towers were demolished
primarily by hidden, internal, nuclear devices. The outer structure
demolition events were created-- or faked-- for public consumption and
“plausibility.” One could even argue that this issue is a side-show to distract
from the nuking of the towers, and likely several other WTC buildings.
There may even have been precedent for this. Dr. Deagle's military expert's
revelation to him even indicates that the OKC bombing may have been, in
a way, the blueprint for the WTC bombing, as follows: The expert indicated
that the truck's conventional bomb went off at the same time the micro-
nukes were detonated, and acted as cover for the micro-nukes. Numerous
explosives experts had separately stated that the truck bomb could not
have had sufficient explosive power to do the damage observed. My
hypothesis for the WTC tower bombings also has conventional explosives
being used as cover for more massive damage done by simultaneous
nuclear devices. I assert that what was happening inside—- nuclear
detonation(s)—- caused the collapses, regardless of what any outer
explosions did, or were faked to appear to have done. This may even be
consistent with the towers’ demolitions actually beginning with the large
explosions-- apparently in the sub-basements of the towers-- recorded
several seconds (see above) before the visible “collapses” began near the
tops. In the final analysis, I assert—- as per the above detailed nuclear
mechanism—that even if there were no outer structure explosions, the
outer structure would have “peeled away” anyway because of what was
occurring inside.
Finally in writing this WTC nuke hypothesis, I have left it somewhat in the
chronological order that it was written. In this light, I have seen video
evidence that appears to clearly supersede some of the ideas above.
However, I will leave those in, as it is still possible that numerous things
were used by the perps to confuse the issue, or for later release when the
time suits them, and for completeness for future researchers. But this video
—- which also fits the geometry of the situation—- is one of the clearest of
the initial destruction of WTC1, and appears to fit a nuclear demolition only
—- i.e., conventional explosives appear not to have been needed or used.
This video (if genuine) indicates that a central, nuclear, spherical blast
occurred at the central level of the bogus plane hit—- about the 98th floor
or so. Now imagine many lines (representing blast energy) radiating away
from this nuclear bomb center at the same time. The shortest distance—-
or time—- to the outer structure occurs occurs along the horizontal level
with the bomb, which is, as per the above, about the 98th floor. (This can
also be imagined as a sphere inside WTC1 whose horizontal diameters just
touch the inside of the tower at the 98th floor.) Next to reach the outer
structure would be the radii just above and just below this floor. Again, the
next radii after this to simultaneously reach the outer structure would be
two floors below and two floors above this 98th floor. Thus we would have
succeeding downward exploding outer floors at the same time that we
would have succeeding upward exploding outer floors. But (rising) smoke,
and debris quickly obscure things. As the visible “wave” of exploding outer
floors travels downward, the top piece of WTC1 accordions into itself and
vaporizes. This accordioning rate appears to be at the same rate as the
rate below the “hit” level. Also, gravity would not have much effect on these
rapid explosions (and these ideas) if the 10 floors per second “collapse”
rate for that first second is accurate. So it appears that no separate nuke
was essential for destroying the top pieces. The nuke used at “collapse”
initiation was sufficient to both vaporize a significant part of the tower both
below and above the “plane hit” level, and the video shows this. As above,
this nuke had a diameter of about 30 floors, and likely two more were
needed and used, not counting any cleaner nukes. Also I believe “extras”
were in place at points along the height of the towers, and near the base
for use as needed.
Summary and Conclusions
This article has attempted to elaborate on how nuclear devices demolished

the WTC towers, and to explain related phenomenon observed at that
time, and afterwards. While the immense complexity, removal of evidence,
and alteration of evidence makes certainty quite impossible, the above
analysis indicates the following scenario may be the most likely. Bogus
plane hits (perhaps accompanied by genuine plane/missile fly-bys) were
really explosions of pre-planted conventional shaped explosive charges
simulating plane outlines. After a certain amount of time for (the bogus
claim of) melting the steel support, the towers were demolished (as were
other WTC buildings with concomitant EMP evidence), with internal nuclear
devices, most likely mini-fusion bombs. The demolitions began in each
tower with a nuclear device going off at the “plane hit” level. The geometry
and the video evidence indicate several more were used per tower, and
that a cleaner nuke was used at the end. This article is also perhaps the
first to provide a plausible explanation for the remarkable high
temperatures and molten steel , observed for weeks and
months after 9/11, at the WTC. The explanation given here is that
one or more non-exploded, nuclear devices lost their integrity from the
effects of other nuclear devices going off. These “affected” nukes attained
some criticality akin to a nuclear reactor, and gave off high heat for weeks
and months afterwards. This nuclear scenario hypothesis appears to be
consistent and complete; and has no need for other things such as
thermite (except possibly at the bogus plane hits/explosions), or directed
energy beam weapons, or other exotica.
The author hopes that this article will initiate comments, corrections,
improvements, and much needed discussion and action. Shills should
always remember that the perps who placed the nukes were likely the first
to be eliminated on 9/11. The author wishes to thank Spooked for his
helpful ideas during the writing of this article, and for posting it.
It is hoped that people never forget that this horrific event

was nothing less than a wanton, nuclear holocaust
perpetrated against nearly 3,000 people by their so-called
government. And used as an excuse to murder countless
more thousands of human beings who had nothing to do
with the events of 9/11/01.
Finally, about the radiation issue, please see this article.
<< Home
World Trade Center Demolition: If the WTC Nuclear Destruction Had the China Syndrome Aftermath, Why Didn’t Hiroshima?

Tuesday, September 02, 2008 trade center buildings 1, 2
If the WTC Nuclear Destruction Had the China demolition.
Syndrome Aftermath, Why Didn’t Hiroshima?
by The Anonymous Physicist About Me

Name: spooked
The extensive evidence that the World Trade Center area “suffered” from Location: United States
great heat in the rubble pile and beneath the towers, from heat generated
by the China Syndrome is here. But if my nuclear fission hypothesis The official 9/11 story is a lie. The 9/11 plane
for the destruction of the WTC is correct, why didn’t the fission bomb that hijackings and crashes were clever hoaxes. The
destroyed Hiroshima have a known China Syndrome there? WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7 towers were brought
The reason is that there are numerous differences between the two events. use of small nuclear bombs in the demolition of
My “many nukes” hypothesis for WTC destruction contains the concepts of WTC1 and 2. All in all, 9/11 was a massive and
redundant nukes, fratricided and fizzled nukes. Please read the above cruel hoax foisted upon the world, done in order
archived articles to understand just what attempting to explode many small to spark the obscene "war on terror", to cover up
nukes in the enclosed buildings entails, and even my hypothesis that the financial fraud and to further the ends of the
early explosions in WTC7 likely were fizzled micro-nukes. Now for some global elite. 9/11 was only the most egregious of
specific, relevant differences. Hiroshima was just one fission nuclear bomb, several other recent false-flag terror operations.
not many as with the WTC. Redundant, fratricided and fizzled nukes are
not relevant to the events of Hiroshima, unlike the WTC. Finally, Hiroshima View my complete profile
did not have a China Syndrome Aftermath because the A-bomb went off at
an altitude of about 1800 feet, and IN OPEN AIR-- NOT IN THE CENTERS More 9/11 Links (Note: I present a wide
OF BUILDINGS NOR THEIR BASEMENTS. variety of 9/11 sites here for the
The Hiroshima nuke was, of course, much larger than the sum of the you to judge their content.)
numerous micro-nukes employed to destroy the WTC. As I have detailed,
a fission nuke uses up only some 1-6% of its fissile material in its chain
reactions before the remainder is blown apart from the heat and pressure General 9/11 Sites
resulting from the chain reactions. The 80 generations of fission chain 9/11 Blimp
reaction take but a total of one microsecond before the bomb’s contents 9/11 Busters
themselves are blown apart. In the open air, much of the micro-fragments 9/11 CGI Watch
of the remainder 94-99% of the fissile material (Uranium-235) were in the
9/11 Complicity
fireball, and much of this rose further with the fireball. But these heavy
9/11 Cover-Up
Uranium atoms fell back down. Some dispersed into the upper atmosphere,
9/11 Dossier (UK)
and would come down around the world. (Note that no Gov’t has released
atmospheric radiation data in the days after 9/11/01--this is perhaps both 9/11 Encyclopedia
telling [of the worldwide collusion of regimes] and sad.) At Hiroshima, they 9/11 Foreknowledge
came down in notorious fashion. Much of the remaining Uranium fissioning 9/11 Hoax
atoms came down 30 minutes later in the so-called “Black Rain.” Many
9/11 Oddities
more people may have died because they suffered desperate thirst from
their dehydrated condition in part from damaged, melted, hanging skin; and 9/11 Overview
they drank the black rain, as there no longer was running water. They thus
9/11 Plot
ingested radioactive particles. (The worst thing they could have done.)
9/11 Proof
There was no known China Syndrome Aftermath at Hiroshima because the 9/11 Resources
Uranium atoms came down over a widely dispersed area; and thus were 9/11 Review.org
not concentrated enough to have heat generating effect in any known 9/11 Review.com
areas. Note that I have detailed that at Hiroshima, radiation levels on the
http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2008/09/if-wtc-nuclear-destruction-had-china.html[07.11.2010 14:48:45]
9/11 Stealth
ground were low enough so that American troops were there performing 9/11 Strike
various tasks within a few days. At the WTC, the micro-nukes (emplaced in 9/11 True Story
the centers) were chosen small enough so as to not vaporize the outer 9/11 "U"
structure (and give the Op-Plan away). So as the micro-nukes were going 9/11 Verses
off at each level and in the sub-basement area, the outer structure was still Awoken Research Group
extant for the most part. Also there was no fireball under these conditions Complete 9/11 Timeline (Paul
Thompson)
that rose to 15,000 feet or so. Just as there were no fireballs seen in all the Finnish 9/11 Site
underground nuclear tests. And there was no rain for several days. The Finnish 9/11 Site in English
heavy Uranium atoms and fragments, if in the dust, would have come down Gallerize
first, with all the many lighter elements coming down on top of them soon German Engineers 9/11 site
thereafter. This effect may even have provided some radiation shielding. Hybrideb's 9/11 site
Much of the rubble pile was indeed hot, and led to such phenomena as Icelandic 9/11 site
melted firemen’s and dog’s boots; and the need to hose down the rubble Jane Doe's 9/11 site
pile for many weeks and months, with countless photos showing the steam Juscogen's 9/11 site
emanation that resulted. Fratricided or fizzled nukes and the more totally Killtown
enclosed sub-basement effect would have left more concentrated fission Oil and Empire 9/11 (Mark Robinowitz)
fragments in some areas and in the former basements. These would later Portland Indy Media 9/11
give rise to massive temperatures and molten metal weeks and months 119 Questions about 9/11
Let's Roll 9/11
later, as detailed in the above-cited archived articles.
Essay
Indeed, I would assert that the floors that were chosen for the initial Morgan Reynolds 9/11 Commission
explosions, (the “official,” but CGI “plane hit” floors), were chosen precisely Essay
because they still provided enough height and building material so that the Missile Gate (analysis of 1st hit)
Nerdcities 9/11
first nukes going off at their top-most level would not vaporize through to
Operation 9/11
the top! That could have allowed a visible rising fireball that had to be
Planet Quo 9/11
avoided. In other words, if the first nuke, in the top-down demolition,
occurred at or near the top floor, it could have vaporized through to the RINF 9/11 Archive
outside air and a visible fireball could have then ensued. So the floors for Terrorize (Danish 911 site)
the “plane hit” explosions were carefully chosen to coincide with the The Mysteries of 9/11
placement of the initial nukes to go off. This logic also dictates that if there THE TRUTH ABOUT SEPT 11 (Compiled
were no planes, it is also highly unlikely that missiles hit the towers either. by Gerard Holmgren)
Anything hitting the towers could have jeopardized both the smaller shape Shunned
charges to go off-- and create the so-called plane-shaped holes; and also if Physics 911
Physics 9/11.co.nr
the wrong floor were hit, it could have interfered with the planned start of
Plague Puppy's Cafe
the top-down nuclear demolition, although some redundancy was probably
built in.
Question 911
Truth 911
But we should also never forget at least one similarity between Hiroshima Brad's 911 site
and the WTC. Just as many people close to the Hiroshima hypocenter Club Ivy's 911 site
were vaporized, over 1100 human beings in the WTC towers were so Brad's old 9/11 site
vaporized that no intact strands of DNA could be used for identification. Flamesong 9/11 Essay and Links
But fortunately there was one major difference in the aftermath, there was Serendipity (various essays on 9/11)
no widely dispersed, radioactive “black rain” to ingest or have fall upon Stop the Lie 9/11
people. The people of Japan have never forgotten their “black rain,” nor The Strange Images of 9/11/2001
their Hiroshima that was perpetrated by the same regime, primarily against Total 9/11 Info
innocent women, children and old men (despite the American propaganda Unanswered Questions
efforts to imply otherwise). Likewise it must be the task for Americans to Questions Questions
learn what this same regime did to the innocent human beings in the World The Web Fairy
Wing TV
Trade Center and the 40,000 responders, and the many nearby Metro New
York residents and workers.
9/11 Activism
The terms Hiroshima and World Trade Center need to become 9/11 Blogger
synonymous. And the world needs to come together to counter this same 9/11 Citizens' Watch
monstrous regime before it kills all or most of humanity! 9/11 Skeptics Unite!
911 Truth.org
posted by spooked @ 4:37 AM 911 Truth LA.us
911 Truth LA.org
911 Truth Emergence
911 We Know
<< Home 9-11 Visibility Project
9-11 UK
NY 9/11 Truth

Summer of Truth
Proposition 911
Reopen 911
Deception Dollars
Justice for 9/11

Team 8 Plus
Flight 93 Hoax
WTC Demolition
9/11 Photo Analysis
WTC
collapse
Flight 77 FOIA site
Flight 93 Crash.com
Pentagon Research
9/11 Flash Movies

Buddy Buddy
Pentagon Strike
911 Questions

that question 9/11
Rigorous Intuition
Wing TV
Xymphora
Killtown's Blog
George Washington
Propaganda Matrix
Daniel Hopsicker
Cryptome
World Order News
Good Intro Books to

Griffin
Ray Griffin
Ian Henshall
Webster G. Tarpley
Thompson

Ruppert
Hopsicker

Arctic Beacon

with 9/11
Break for News
Tom Flocco

Buzzflash
The Raw Story
Think Progress
Common Dreams
Consortium News
Cursor
Guerrilla News
Online Journal
The Memory Hole
Press Action
News from Babylon
Unknown News
TV News Lies
Eschaton
Daily Kos
Talking Points Memo
Hullabaloo
Billmon
The Brad Blog
Jesus' General
The Rude Pundit
The Poor Man
Today in Iraq
Antiwar.com
Constant Pated
Clusterfuck Nation
Donkey Rising
Salon
Slate
My Other Blogs
Al-CIA-duh
Ghost Plane
Flight 93 Hoax


Peak Oil and

Oil and Gas
The Oil Drum
Land of Black Gold
Richard Heinberg
Grist

Conspiracy Theory!
World Trade Center Demolition: How to Explain the Incredible Symmetrical Destruction of WTC7?

Sunday, July 01, 2007 trade center buildings 1, 2
How to Explain the Incredible Symmetrical demolition.
Destruction of WTC7?
WTC7 Demolition: Conventional, or Nuclear After All-- and About Me

the Speculative Nuclear Borer Hypothesis Name: spooked
By the Anonymous Physicist
The "anonymous physicist" writes: I trust you have read my recent articles use of small nuclear bombs in the demolition of
on the nuclear destruction of the WTC. In that I wrote that the controlled WTC1 and 2. All in all, 9/11 was a massive and
demolition (henceforth abbreviated as CD) of WTC7 appeared to be cruel hoax foisted upon the world, done in order
conventional. I reasoned that videos do not show the massive outward to spark the obscene "war on terror", to cover up
explosions seen during the nuclear destruction of WTC1, 2. And there is financial fraud and to further the ends of the
the fact that much of WTC1 and 2 was vaporized and is not there in its own global elite. 9/11 was only the most egregious of
rubble (footprint), whereas WTC7 demolition shows numerous "pancaked" several other recent false-flag terror operations.
floors remaining. But further examining of the evidence requires continued
thinking on this question. View my complete profile
As always, I caution people to overcome naiveté and inertia; and to realize More 9/11 Links (Note: I present a wide
the possibility that many photos and videos released on all 9/11 variety of 9/11 sites here for the
skyscrapers' "collapses" may have been altered. We know that most, if not purposes of diversity. I leave it up to
all of the videos of the two "plane hits" of the twin towers have been you to judge their content.)
altered, or are simply computer generated. Having said that, here is a
fairly complete set of several videos from different locations
and angles showing WTC7 destruction. Can we contrast this with General 9/11 Sites
video of a conventional demolition of a similarly shaped wide skyscraper? 9/11 Blimp
See this demolition of the 32-storey, "wide-body" Stardust 9/11 Busters
9/11 CGI Watch
Casino in Las Vegas. Ignore the added Vegas fireworks. Notice how
the entire (all the way up to the top) central structure all falls down, from
9/11 Complicity
the very onset of demolition, with the sides collapsing on top of this at the
9/11 Cover-Up
end. Notice also that the moving plumes of smoke start after the entire
9/11 Dossier (UK)
edifice has hit the ground. Contrast the latter with WTC7, which had much
larger plumes of smoke flowing certainly at the start of demolition, and 9/11 Encyclopedia
perhaps apparently even before (from basement explosions?) 9/11 Foreknowledge
9/11 Hoax
But perhaps the most striking difference is in the near perfect, intact,
9/11 Oddities
ensemble "sliding down" of the upper floors of WTC7. With the exception of
the initial collapse of the central penthouse, and an apparent initial kinking 9/11 Overview
of the top left area of WTC7, we see an almost miraculous, perfectly
9/11 Plot
uniform, even collapse. I assert that this is a demolition unlike any other, for
9/11 Proof
many reasons. But the usual destruction of mere supports does not appear
to be involved here. Rather whole levels of structure below the visible top 9/11 Resources
floors appear to have been vaporized-more on this later. Now we appear to 9/11 Review.org
see at least the top 20 floors or more just coming down as an intact 9/11 Review.com
ensemble. What can account for such near-perfect uniformity? We don't
http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2007/07/how-to-explain-incredible-symmetrical.html[07.11.2010 14:49:27]
9/11 Stealth
see this in other CDs of similarly shaped buildings. Indeed, in other CDs, 9/11 Strike
we saw that the initial central collapse followed by the outer portions falling 9/11 True Story
inwards is created by the CD planners for the final footprint result, and 9/11 "U"
occurs at the onset of CD. Assuming the videos are (somewhat) genuine, 9/11 Verses
was the initial, central, rooftop penthouse "collapse" a clever way to get Awoken Research Group
people to think the whole thing was occurring like other controlled Complete 9/11 Timeline (Paul
Thompson)
demolitions? When the rest of it is not. (Or was the Penthouse coupled to Finnish 9/11 Site
something in the basement, or the lowest floors?) Finnish 9/11 Site in English
Gallerize
Part of the problem of analyzing the WTC7 CD, is the fact that smoke, and German Engineers 9/11 site
other buildings, obscure what happens to the bottom half. A chemist, Hybrideb's 9/11 site
Frank Legge, PhD stated that the upper floors of WTC7 Icelandic 9/11 site
came down just slightly slower than freefall speed in a Jane Doe's 9/11 site
vacuum (6.2 vs. 6.0 sec.). His article is in Steven Jones' "Journal." It Juscogen's 9/11 site
concerns itself in proving that fires and gravity could not have caused the Killtown
WTC7 "collapse," and that conventional CD did. Legge even wrote, in Oil and Empire 9/11 (Mark Robinowitz)
defense of his conventional CD hypothesis, that the bulk of the WTC7 Portland Indy Media 9/11
"came straight down with extraordinary precision." To me, all this begs the 119 Questions about 9/11
Let's Roll 9/11
real question: Was this a conventional CD, or was WTC7 a nuclear CD, like
WTC1 and 2? For completeness, I note that others state that the CD of Essay
WTC7 was faster than free-fall time, and that a vacuum was created by the Morgan Reynolds 9/11 Commission
explosions that "sucked" the building downwards. Thermobaric, or Fuel-Air Essay
Explosives (FAE), are sometimes cited with this hypothesis. A partial Missile Gate (analysis of 1st hit)
Nerdcities 9/11
vacuum is said to be created with this type of explosive. Of course, even
Operation 9/11
this type of explosive does not vaporize the contents of a building that they
Planet Quo 9/11
might be used in. But these possibilities should be considered.
RINF 9/11 Archive
In more detail, we must ask, does nearly the entire visible part of the Terrorize (Danish 911 site)
building, WTC7, just come down AS IS (without any central falling inward) The Mysteries of 9/11
because some of the lower floors are no longer there? Were they THE TRUTH ABOUT SEPT 11 (Compiled
vaporized by a nuke, or nukes? Again because of either video doctoring, or by Gerard Holmgren)
smoke and building obscuration, we do not see the bottom floors. We do Shunned
know that WTC7, and much of the WTC, had hotspots as seen by Physics 911
Physics 9/11.co.nr
AVIRIS/NASA plane overflights. For the moment, let us discuss the
Plague Puppy's Cafe
undergound hotpsots and molten steel in general, regardless of which
WTC building these are under; because I will end with an unimpeachable
Question 911
witness to vaporized steel beneath WTC7. Now these AVIRIS overflights Truth 911
took place on 9/16/01 and 9/23/01. Temperatures as high as 1000 degrees Brad's 911 site
Kelvin or 1341 degrees Fahrenheit were found. This article makes Club Ivy's 911 site
clear that these were surface temperatures. Thus, if the heat Brad's old 9/11 site
source was significantly further undergound (as I will demonstrate), the Flamesong 9/11 Essay and Links
source(s) would likely have been at much higher temperatures. Now, as Serendipity (various essays on 9/11)
with the destruction of WTC1 and 2, gravitational pancaking does not allow Stop the Lie 9/11
for 1300 F. degree surface temperature days and weeks later-nor for the The Strange Images of 9/11/2001
much higher temperatures further underground. It is also improbable or Total 9/11 Info
impossible that conventional controlled demolition could account for this Unanswered Questions
either. But the "extreme temperatures" of a nuke might, or as I Questions Questions
hypothesized, the remnants of unexploded nukes undergoing partial The Web Fairy
Wing TV
criticality could account for these temperatures. This remarkable
photo shows flaming and apparently molten steel (if you
look closely) being dug out of the bottom of WTC1 in late 9/11 Activism
October. It is more easily seen here. Indeed the previous link has 9/11 Blogger
firefighter Joe O'Toole state that in February of the next year, there still 9/11 Citizens' Watch
was molten steel at the WTC! Here we have firefighters describing 9/11 Skeptics Unite!
FLOWING molten steel weeks later. It is impossible to explain such 911 Truth.org
high temperatures so long after 9/11 except for the use of nukes, and/or 911 Truth LA.us
possible heat GENERATION via nuclear criticalities, as previously cited. 911 Truth LA.org
911 Truth Emergence
Now I wish to make a crucial assertion. I may be the first to assert that the 911 We Know
second AVIRIS data set is bogus! It claims that nearly all the hot spots 911 Truth Movement Musings
were gone by 9/23. The govt's "data" claims that the "over three dozen hot
9-11 UK
spots [on 9/16]" were reduced to "4 or possibly 5" with greatly reduced
temperatures by 9/23. Curiously, the 9/16 data were released two days
NY 9/11 Truth
later on 9/18; but the 9/23 data were not released until 10/12-19 days later!

I believe that honest scientists got the first set out ASAP, but the regime Scholars for 9/11 Truth
had time to block and alter the second AVIRIS set. And don't forget no Community Currency 9/11
further testing--or more likely release--of similar plane or satellite overflights Summer of Truth
was allowed. What do I base these assertions on? When honest, intrepid Proposition 911
firefighters, and other responders state they witnessed molten steel weeks Reopen 911
and months later, and when photos show the removal of such molten steel Deception Dollars
weeks later, I know whom to believe. This is analogous to the Zapruder film Justice for 9/11
of President Kennedy's murder. That film purports to show the limo moving
at a steady 10 mph throughout. This despite the fact that numerous
eyewitnesses stated that the limo came to a complete halt (so that the
Team 8 Plus
driver could do what others had failed to do.) Some of these eyewitnesses
Flight 93 Hoax
soon paid the ultimate price. Zapruder himself at the Garrison trial of Clay WTC Demolition
Shaw refused to state, under oath, that the version of his film shown in The Ultimate Hijacker Compilation
court was the one he had shot! So if I have to choose between intrepid 9/11 Photo Analysis
firemen with nothing to gain, versus a President-murdering, Apollo Evidence of Explosives on 9/11
Hoaxing, its own citizen nuking, world destroying regime, the choice is clear Demolition, the Truth of 9/11 and the
to me. All the eyewitnesses and photos demonstrate that the long-delayed WTC
release of the 9/23 AVIRIS data is false! The release of an honest set of collapse
such data would have shown very high temperatures weeks and months WTC Streaking Object, WTC7 theories
later. This not only would have shot down the official ludicrous "collapse" Flight 77 FOIA site
story, but also the regime's planned release of the shill physicist's termite, Flight 93 Crash.com
er I mean thermite story. The release of honest temperature grids at the Pentagon Research
WTC, weeks and months later, would have proven the case for nuclear Brad's Pentagon Analysis
demolition, and/or heat generation by nuclear reacting criticality sites! This Where Is Osama (The Osama Clock)
had to be avoided at all costs.
9/11 Flash Movies

Now let us return to the demolition of WTC7. Unlike WTC1, 2, which I
hypothesized were nuclear CD's, we do not see any great outward
Buddy Buddy
explosions with WTC7 because they would be going off in the unseen lower Pentagon Strike
floors, including perhaps most likely the basement floors. WTC7 officially 911 Questions
had five basement levels according to one (shill) website. Now any nuke;
or nukes, used in WTC7 were either limited to the basement and lowest
floors only. But was the "collapse" observed so nearly perfectly even Reasonably reliable "Conspiracy Sites"
because numerous basement and lower floors had just been vaporized? I that question 9/11
think there is a good chance this is what happended. Especially when we Rigorous Intuition
also consider what would be revealed underneath WTC7 weeks later. Wing TV
Xymphora
While we must always consider the possibility of fakery with WTC7, let us Killtown's Blog
assume for now that the videos of its unique demolition are genuine. But
let us further examine another of my hypotheses, from my previous nuclear
George Washington
demolition article. I made the novel assertion that Larry Silverstein's
statement that WTC7 was "pulled", was no slip-up. I believe the PTB have Prison Planet (Alex Jones)
been--from the moment of WTC7's "collapse"--telling the world that WTC7 Daily Two Minutes of Hate
was brought down by controlled demolition. As it was happening, we had The Emperor's New Clothes
CBS' Dan Rather say "it's reminiscent of those pictures we've all seen too Public Action (Carol Valentine)
much on television before when a building was deliberately destroyed by Propaganda Matrix
well placed dynamite to knock it down." Note the admission/allusion to Daniel Hopsicker
conventional controlled demolition. We saw that in the assassination of Cryptome
President Kennedy, Dan Rather upon being the only reporter shown the Crimes and Corruptions of the New
World Order News
Zapruder film, stated/lied that JFK went forward in the limo, after the fatal
head shot, when in fact, he was flung backwards from the frontal shot
(driver). Likewise, anything he said at critical 9/11 events was also scripted
for him. Then we had, years later, John Kerry "admit" too that Good Intro Books to
WTC7 was imploded by conventional CD. We know that Alternative 9/11 Truth
everything Kerry does is also according to his taskmasters. When he was
informed that the Ohio 2004 Presidential election was rigged, and that he Questions About the Bush
was really the next president, and could prove it if he wanted to, he then Administration and 9/11" by David Ray
Griffin
immediately conceded. He acted out his script. "The 9/11 Commission Report:
Ray Griffin
So why are the Rathers, the Silversteins, the Kerrys of this country so
happy to publicly proclaim a conventional CD for WTC7? One possibility Ian Henshall
must be that it was a nuclear CD. Recall how I noted that whenever the "9/11 Synthetic Terror, Made in USA" by
regime admits to something very bad, the real truth is usually vastly worse. Webster G. Tarpley
In this light, we must ponder why they needed about six or seven hours to Thompson
demolish WTC7, after the others were destroyed? Admittedly WTC7 "Crossing the Rubicon" by Michael C.
harbored the FBI, the Secret Service, the CIA, the IRS, the SEC, the Ruppert
Mayor's Command and Control Center, and according to Guiliani, another "Welcome to Terrorland" by Daniel
Hopsicker
federal govt agency that he couldn't name. The latter is often code for the
NSA, which officially "does not exist (No Such Agency)". And its charter is
itself classified as top secret. Of course, there could always have been "Conspiracy Sites" that deal with 9/11
federal agencies even more secret than the NSA in WTC7. Some have that I have significant issues with
speculated that WTC7 likely was the "command and control center" for the What Really Happened
9/11 op. Therefore there would have been things in WTC7 that were From the Wilderness (Mike Ruppert)
needed for the destruction of the other buildings of the WTC on 9/11! So it Arctic Beacon
couldn't be demolished until after the others were. And perhaps it took
some time to 1) get out things they wanted to save, and 2) set things up so
as to absolutely guarantee destruction (vaporization?) of certain other
with 9/11
things. This apparently took more time than they expected. How do we Break for News
surmise this? Because we now know that they told the media to announce Tom Flocco
that WTC7 came down before it actually did! So we can guess that either
1) There was something important to get out that took longer than they
planned for, and/or 2) Making certain something would be completely Democratic/Progressive News Sites,
destroyed took longer than they planned for, and/or 3) outside events Blogs and Miscellaneous Links
occurred that precluded the scheduled destruction of WTC7. The last could Buzzflash
be something like isolated military commanders tried to counter the events The Raw Story
of 9/11 and the regime needed to counter that with the use of something in Democratic Underground
WTC7. Of course, only the nuking of the contents of WTC7 would Progressive Independent
Think Progress
guarantee that said contents were totally unrecoverable (vaporized). Now
there is a 4th explanation: the remarkable possibility that the federal perps
Common Dreams
drilled out sub-basement levels on 9/11 itself. See below.
Consortium News
So in the analysis of the demolition of WTC7 on 9/11, we must consider 1) Cursor
The possibility that videos are doctored, and need extensive analysis, as Guerrilla News
the now-proven bogus "plane hit" videos have been; and 2) The probability- Online Journal
especially if the videos are genuine-that WTC7 was demolished through the The Memory Hole
use of mini-nuke(s) in the lower floors and/or basement levels. Evidence of Information Clearing House
the unique, ensemble whole (upper) building "collapse" and the very high Press Action
temperatures and molten steel beneath the rubble of WTC7 for days and News from Babylon
weeks afterwards support this nuclear hypothesis. In any case, future Unknown News
inquiry should be directed not to the question of if this was a controlled TV News Lies
demolition, but rather whether it was a nuclear demolition, which appears After Downing Street
likely. Eschaton
Daily Kos
Talking Points Memo
The following section is to be regarded, at this time, as purely speculation,
Hullabaloo
and is not essential to this article on the demolition of WTC7. This
Billmon
speculative hypothesis (apparently published here for the first time) relates The Brad Blog
to the nuclear demolition of WTC7, and possibly the other WTC buildings. Jesus' General
The following speculation could provide for the necessary nuclear reactors The Rude Pundit
which provided either the explosive nuclear material (Tahil hypothesis), or The Poor Man
more likely, IMO, the source for heat GENERATION weeks and months Juan Cole (Informed Comment)
later to explain all the hotpsots, and molten steel observed at such later Today in Iraq
dates-as late as February 2002. Note that this section is not necessary for Antiwar.com
the whole of my WTC Nuclear CD Theory, as I have already stated that Iraq Coalition Casualties
blasted, unexploded mini-nukes could have provided for the nuclear Constant Pated
reacting criticality sites, and resultant hotpsots. I write now of the Clusterfuck Nation
remarkable Nuclear Borer. A photo of which is here- note it states that 42 Donkey Rising
levels were bored out by the Nuclear Borer. Here is the public patent Salon
Slate
granted in 1972.
A discussion of the Nuclear Borer is here. I am only concerned with what
is spoken of at 2:35 seconds in. I will not comment on the rest of this video. My Other Blogs
I am only concerned with the depiction and knowledge of the Nuclear Humint Events Online
Borer. Note that the 1972 public patent states, "The heat source can be THE WORST PRESIDENT EVER!!!!
electrical or nuclear but for deep drilling is preferably a nuclear reactor." We Bush Administration War Criminals
must note that if this remarkable military device had a PUBLIC patent Fake Opposition Democrats
granted in 1972, it must have been used much earlier. And it is highly likely Al-CIA-duh
that 30 years later, in 2001, there would have been much faster, more Ghost Plane
powerful, smaller versions in existence. Other eyewitnesses have stated Flight 93 Hoax
that this is precisely the case, and they have been used to quickly construct
massive, very deep (thousands of feet), underground, connected bases-but
this is beyond the present discussion.
This Nuclear Borer speculative aspect of my WTC nuclear demolition

theory perhaps resolves the last piece of the puzzle, as follows. Apparently
few people seem to be concerned with the fact that the molten steel at the
WTC weeks and months later should require a source for the
GENERATION of such heat, weeks and months later. I had hypothesized
that these great hotspots (deep) underground were nuclear criticality sites
from blasted, but unexploded mini-nukes. But the fact that there are so
many of these hotpsots indicates that these may not have been
"accidents"/mishaps; rather the resultant hotpsots may have occurred
because their source was built into the demolition scheme itself. The
nuclear reactors in the Nuclear Borers appear to fill this last piece of the
puzzle quite well. But the earlier hypothesis of nukes blasting unexploded
other mini-nukes, resulting in nuclear-reacting criticality hotpsots may still
hold. In more detail, regarding this Nuclear Borer hypothesis, the requisite
20 or more floors were drilled out in the sub-basement, with stability left in,
until that was exploded by the mini-nuke(s) at 5:30. The drilling-out was
possibly done that day, after evacuation after the "plane hits". Perhaps this
"perfect ensemble collapse" was perpetrated to reinforce the claim that the
two towers came down via gravitational pancaking. Maybe the powers that
be thought it would be easier for the masses to swallow this, if they
"collapsed" at least one of the buildings--which by then had many video
cameras trained on it--to look like a gravitational pancaking--which the END
result does, as does a superficial understanding/viewing of the WTC7
"collapse" itself. But recall all the chaos in the nuking of WTC 1 and 2. Interesting Mainstream Articles on 9/11
Recall the whole chunks breaking off, and that massive, separated top part
of WTC2? Did the WTC1, 2 "collapses" look anything like the perfect
ensemble "collapse" of WTC7? Or did WTC7 demolition, look anything like
any other demolition? So perhaps the WTC7 demolition fell as such a
"perfect ensemble" because it fell into its own perfectly drilled-out footprint! Miscellaneous Items of Interest
Nukes provide for lots of "uneven" chaos. Perhaps only a perfectly drilled- CNN infiltrated by US Army Psy-ops
out hole could have accounted for the perfect ensemble collapse--drilled US National Debt Clock
out by the Nuclear Borer (or successor device). The American Taliban
Let us look at the history of the WTC, and the nuclear Borer. The WTC was
Peak Oil and
built in the late 60's and early 70's, when the Nuclear Borer had already
been used for some time in drilling out underground nuclear bomb cavities.
One possibility in my Nuclear Borer Speculation is thus that Nuclear Oil and Gas
Borer(s) could have been used at the WTC during its construction, and left The Oil Drum
in place for use during its destruction! Another possibility (as per the above) Land of Black Gold
is that one of them--or a more potent, yet smaller, successor device--was Flying Talking Donkey
very busy underneath WTC7 for some 6-7 hours, drilling out sufficient sub- Life After the Oil Crash
basement floors to allow the unique ensemble collapse of WTC7 at around Richard Heinberg
5:30 P.M. This may answer numerous questions: Could this be why they Grist
took so long, after the other buildings were destroyed? Could some
unexpected problem in the use of the Nuclear Borer be the reason that the The Official 9/11 Story IS a
PTB gave the media too early a time for the destruction of WTC7? Could Conspiracy Theory!
the exploded nuclear reactors in several Nuclear Borers, and their still
critical components be the underground source for the many hotspots and 9/11 was a conspiracy, as it involved several
molten steel weeks and months later? Could the Nuclear Borer's reactors 9/11 narrative, as codified by the 9/11
be the fission reactors that William Tahil hypothesized? I always thought likely explanation for the events of 9/11/01. The
his hypothesis had some merit, but didn't quite fit. Unlike Tahil, I believe official 9/11 story is therefore a theory. This
that mini-nukes (fusion devices) brought down the towers, and possibly all "CONSPIRACY THEORY"!
the other WTC buildings and now WTC7 too. And these nukes could have
also exploded the reactors in the Nuclear Borers which may have been
used to drill out necessary parts of each of the WTC buildings for the other
nukes to do their thing. In particular, extensive Nuclear Borer drilling may I have no fondness for any religion, as I think it
have occurred some time before WTC7 destruction, perhaps that late Islamic terrorists do exist and I detest them as
morning and afternoon. This allowed for that most unique "falling in its own much as I detest the true perpetrators of 9/11.
footprint" "collapse" ever to be seen. WTC7 did fall through its own footprint patsies in 9/11, as part of a highly organized
once demolition began; as many underground floors had been bored out covert operation by a group affiliated with the US
and a mini-nuke set-off underground or at a lower floor above ground

initiated its unique destruction. It then indeed proceeded to fall through its
already drilled out footprint-deep underground! This ends the Nuclear Borer
Speculative Hypothesis, which is not necessary for this WTC7 nuclear
demolition article, as a whole.
Finally we have this remarkable WTC7 destruction article,

originally in the (formerly lauded) NY Times, no less. For the most part, the
article has lie after lie, such as this statement: "[WTC7] burned like a giant
torch." Of course, everybody has seen that only a few windows on a couple
of floors had relatively minor fires that could easily have been put out.
These fires were even on lower floors, allowing for an easier task by fire
crews. But the fire department was apparently called off by federal agents.
But in the midst of all these now typical NY Times/Regime lies, we have
this remarkable slip-up and printing of some truth. Dr. Barnett, a professor
of fire protection engineering, said, in speaking of the WTC7 rubble, that
the "fire and structural damage would not explain steel
members in the debris pile that appear to have been partly
evaporated in extraordinarily high temperatures." Here, in
effect, the NY Times has allowed to be printed a statement from a fire
engineering professor, and witness, that some of the steel of WTC7 was
vaporized! And he even admits that any alleged fire and structural damage
could not have caused this vaporization of steel. In effect, he is telling the
world, that only the "extraordinarily high temperatures" of nuclear
demolition allowed for that! For when he cited the vaporization of steel, not
merely the melting of steel, he has proven the case for nukes, and at
WTC7, no less! For completeness I note that the termites, er I mean
thermite, of the disinfo physicist is in no way capable of vaporizing steel. It
might barely be capable of melting steel, but probably not, as it barely
reaches the temperature needed to do this, but since it is an explosive, it
doesn't provide the time to even appreciably melt steel, let alone vaporize
it. An explosive that attains vastly higher temperatures, as do nukes (up to
100 million degrees), can and does cause vaporization virtually instantly at
or near its hypocenter.
The particular WTC 9/11 nuclear demolition hypothesis of the Anonymous

Physicist states that what vaporized steel-nuclear fusion bombs, and what
caused molten steel up to five months later, according to
firefighter/responder Joe O'Toole, were two different mechanisms. The first
(vaporized steel) was from nuclear fusion bombs (mini-nukes); and the
second (molten steel weeks and months later) was from nuclear criticality
sites strewn over the WTC from either damaged, unexploded mini-nukes,
or the speculative hypothesis above.
So in the final analysis, regarding the hypothesis of nuclear destruction of

WTC 1, 2, 5, 6, and now 7, the evidence herein, and in my earlier articles,
including the great surface hotspots (implying far greater temperatures
below the surface), and the molten steel witnessed and photographed
weeks and months later, and the fire professor's admission of vaporized
steel in the WTC7 rubble and his admission that the vaporized steel
present proved that "extraordinarily high temperatures" could only have
caused that; along with the logistics, and other facts previously cited (such
as much EMP evidence), prove that only nuclear explosives and/or nuclear
reactor criticalities can account for all the above.
<< Home
World Trade Center Demolition: China Syndrome

Monday, July 09, 2007 trade center buildings 1, 2
China Syndrome demolition.
The “China Syndrome” Came to New York City on 9/11

About Me
By The Anonymous Physicist
Name: spooked
Some people may not have not fully grasped the significance, and
necessity, of my hypothesis on heat generating criticality sites at the WTC The official 9/11 story is a lie. The 9/11 plane
after 9/11. Some shills have actually, and laughably, attempted to claim hijackings and crashes were clever hoaxes. The
thermite could have been been responsible for these high temperatures WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7 towers were brought
and molten steel. down by demolition, and there is evidence for the
Any attempt to have a complete theory of 9/11 must include the WTC WTC1 and 2. All in all, 9/11 was a massive and
demolition on 9/11 itself, and crucially its aftermath of the great hotpsots cruel hoax foisted upon the world, done in order
and molten steel, up to five months afterwards. The latter being supported to spark the obscene "war on terror", to cover up
by irrefutable, numerous eyewitnesses, and photographs and at least one financial fraud and to further the ends of the
AVIRIS overflight temperature data set. (With the second, long-delayed global elite. 9/11 was only the most egregious of
release of overflight data likely being bogus, as claimed here.) It is risible several other recent false-flag terror operations.
that a shill physicist claims this photo, of a crane lifting molten steel
weeks after 9/11, as “proof” of thermite use on 9/11. Now while thermite, or View my complete profile
other conventional explosive, may have been used in some subsidiary
capacity on 9/11, my earlier articles have highlighted how only mini-nukes More 9/11 Links (Note: I present a wide
could have accounted for all the phenomena of the 9/11 WTC demolitions. variety of 9/11 sites here for the
It is not unexpected, but still sickening, to see how a shill physicist has purposes of diversity. I leave it up to
claimed that the molten steel weeks after 9/11 “proves” thermite alone you to judge their content.)
brought down the WTC towers. He HAS to claim that, for he knows well
that the real source of this molten steel, weeks later, is nuclear reactions.
General 9/11 Sites
I have stated that only nuclear criticality sites could be the source of heat 9/11 Blimp
GENERATION weeks, and months after 9/11. You can find, say on 9/11 Busters
Youtube, numerous videos of thermite being used to melt things, yes, 9/11 CGI Watch
including metal— but no vaporization. Note that the thermite is not being 9/11 Closeup (Gerard Holmgren)
used as an explosive when it is seen melting through a car, e.g. But some 9/11 Complicity
of those videos clearly show that after just a few minutes, the molten 9/11 Cover-Up
9/11 Dossier (UK)
thermite residue cools off and no longer glows. It is highly likely that any
thermite at the WTC on 9/11 would have cooled off within hours. Indeed, I 9/11 Encyclopedia
have stated that even the momentary maximum temperature of a nuke’s 9/11 Foreknowledge
hypocenter (up to 100 million degrees), is known to cool off relatively 9/11 Hoax
quickly. You can ascertain this rapid cooling off in regards to the Trinity
9/11 Oddities
Site, or Hiroshima or Nagasaki, or even H-Bomb test sites. The
temperatures returned to normal at all these sites relatively quickly. 9/11 Overview
Now some claim that oxygen starved fires could allow for vastly longer high 9/11 Plot
temperature fires underground at the WTC. These people don’t seem to 9/11 Proof
realize they have just proven the case ONLY for nuclear chain reactions!!
9/11 Resources
Because only nuclear chain reactions release massive heat almost
9/11 Review.org
indefinitely, without needing ANY oxygen whatsoever! This is not the
9/11 Review.com
case for any conventional (non-nuclear) fire. This “indefinite” massive heat
http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2007/07/china-syndrome.html[07.11.2010 14:50:06]
9/11 Stealth
source was the basis for the term “China Syndrome” in regards to a nuclear 9/11 Strike
reactor mishap which, in theory (but not really due to other factors), could 9/11 True Story
have massive indefinite heat leading to a nuclear reactor criticality (core) 9/11 "U"
remnant burning all the way through to China. 9/11 Verses
Awoken Research Group
This remarkable article on Chernobyl actually states that the China Complete 9/11 Timeline (Paul
Thompson)
Syndrome occurred at Chernobyl. It says, “‘China Syndrome’ of meltdown
Finnish 9/11 Site
had taken place inside the reactor core. Thermal explosion and outbreak of
Finnish 9/11 Site in English
fires in over thirty places were due to high-temperature and falling uranium
Gallerize
core fragments on to the roofs of adjacent buildings.” So here we see learn German Engineers 9/11 site
that the nuclear core had exploded into many pieces of— apparently still Hybrideb's 9/11 site
critically reacting uranium fragments--with their concomitant high Icelandic 9/11 site
temperatures. But this is just the kind of thing I cited in my WTC 9/11 Jane Doe's 9/11 site
nuclear demolition hypothesis of nukes exploding either other unexploded Juscogen's 9/11 site
mini-nukes, or nukes exploding the reactors in the Nuclear Borers. Killtown
So perhaps my previous term, “criticality sites” regarding the source of high Portland Indy Media 9/11
temperatures and molten steel, weeks and months after 9/11 is too vague. 119 Questions about 9/11
Instead I propose that from now on we think of this aftermath of molten Let's Roll 9/11
steel, weeks and months after 9/11 as… “The China Syndrome came to Morgan Reynolds WTC Demolition
Essay
New York City on 9/11.” Morgan Reynolds 9/11 Commission
Essay
posted by spooked @ 5:14 AM Missile Gate (analysis of 1st hit)
Nerdcities 9/11
Operation 9/11
Planet Quo 9/11
<< Home RINF 9/11 Archive
by Gerard Holmgren)
Shunned
Physics 911
Physics 9/11.co.nr
Plague Puppy's Cafe
Question 911
Truth 911
Brad's 911 site
Club Ivy's 911 site
Stop the Lie 9/11
Total 9/11 Info
Questions Questions
The Web Fairy
Wing TV
9/11 Activism
9/11 Blogger
911 Truth.org
911 Truth LA.us
911 Truth LA.org
911 Truth Emergence
911 We Know
9-11 UK
NY 9/11 Truth

Summer of Truth
Proposition 911
Reopen 911
Deception Dollars
Justice for 9/11

Team 8 Plus
Flight 93 Hoax
WTC Demolition
9/11 Photo Analysis
WTC
collapse
Flight 77 FOIA site
Flight 93 Crash.com
Pentagon Research
9/11 Flash Movies

Buddy Buddy
Pentagon Strike
911 Questions

that question 9/11
Rigorous Intuition
Wing TV
Xymphora
Killtown's Blog
George Washington
Propaganda Matrix
Daniel Hopsicker
Cryptome
World Order News
Good Intro Books to

Griffin
Ray Griffin
Ian Henshall
Webster G. Tarpley
Thompson

Ruppert
Hopsicker

Arctic Beacon

with 9/11
Break for News
Tom Flocco

Buzzflash
The Raw Story
Think Progress
Common Dreams
Consortium News
Cursor
Guerrilla News
Online Journal
The Memory Hole
Press Action
News from Babylon
Unknown News
TV News Lies
Eschaton
Daily Kos
Talking Points Memo
Hullabaloo
Billmon
The Brad Blog
Jesus' General
The Rude Pundit
The Poor Man
Today in Iraq
Antiwar.com
Constant Pated
Clusterfuck Nation
Donkey Rising
Salon
Slate
My Other Blogs
Al-CIA-duh
Ghost Plane
Flight 93 Hoax


Peak Oil and

Oil and Gas
The Oil Drum
Land of Black Gold
Richard Heinberg
Grist

Conspiracy Theory!
World Trade Center Demolition: Hanging Skin and Nuclear Blasts

Monday, July 09, 2007 trade center buildings 1, 2
Hanging Skin and Nuclear Blasts demolition.
Another remarkable finding from Anonymous Physicist-- the hanging skin of

9/11 casualty Felipe David is a striking piece of evidence indicating a About Me
nuclear blast in the basement of the WTC.
Name: spooked
Where in the World is Felipe David-- and Did He Survive
Exposure to Nuclear Radiation? The official 9/11 story is a lie. The 9/11 plane
By The Anonymous Physicist WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7 towers were brought
Assuming the following tale is not completely psyops, then on 9/11, Felipe use of small nuclear bombs in the demolition of
David, employed by Aramark Corp., was checking or replenishing vending WTC1 and 2. All in all, 9/11 was a massive and
machines in one of the basement levels of WTC1. (Curiously Aramark cruel hoax foisted upon the world, done in order
Corp has Thomas Kean—Chairman of the 9/11 Commission--as one of its to spark the obscene "war on terror", to cover up
Board Directors since 1994.) financial fraud and to further the ends of the
The following is supposedly Felipe David’s account of what happened several other recent false-flag terror operations.
beginning just before the first plane “hit.” "That day I was in the basement
in sub-level 1 sometime after 8:30am. Everything happened so fast, View my complete profile
everything moved so fast. The building started shaking after I heard the
explosion below, dust was flying everywhere and all of a sudden it got real More 9/11 Links (Note: I present a wide
hot. I threw myself onto the floor, covered my face because I felt like I was variety of 9/11 sites here for the
burned. I sat there for a couple of seconds on the floor and felt like I was purposes of diversity. I leave it up to
going to die, saying to myself 'God, please give me strength.' you to judge their content.)
"When I went in, I told them it was an explosion," said David, who was then
helped out of the WTC by Rodriguez and eventually taken by ambulance to General 9/11 Sites
New York Hospital. "When people looked at me with my skin hanging, they 9/11 Blimp
started crying but I heard others say 'OK, good, good, you made it alive. 9/11 Busters
[This ends the extract from the first URL above.] 9/11 CGI Watch
Now I would like people to note that nowhere in the above quote, allegedly 9/11 Complicity
9/11 Cover-Up
direct from Mr. David, does he mention fire. He states that he felt and
9/11 Dossier (UK)
heard explosion(s), and then “it got real hot.” He never says he saw any
fire. This may be crucial. However when you read of his story through the 9/11 Encyclopedia
words of William Rodriguez, “fire” is added into the story. "He had 9/11 Foreknowledge
been standing in front of a freight elevator on sub-level 1 about 400 feet 9/11 Hoax
from the office when fire burst out of the elevator shaft, causing his injuries."
9/11 Oddities
Reports, as we shall see, differ greatly as to how he got to the vicinity of 9/11 Overview
other workers for help, including keymaster William Rodriguez, of whom 9/11 Oz (Australian)
we have already seen much “coincidence” and strangeness. 9/11 Plot
We have the “most official” story (always the one to be most wary of for 9/11 Proof
those in the know) that he staggered into Rodriguez’ office or area, and
9/11 Resources
Rodriguez helped him outside, and into an ambulance. Some earlier
9/11 Review.org
reports even stated that Rodriguez carried Mr. David. The following site
9/11 Review.com
no longer works, but I copied the following from google: “Rodriguez carried
http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2007/07/hanging-skin-and-nuclear-blasts.html[07.11.2010 14:50:51]
9/11 Stealth
Felipe David out of the building and re-entered it to rescue two men 9/11 Strike
trapped on the elevator who were in danger of ... ” 9/11 True Story
9/11 "U"
But this Christian organization’s website quotes Mr David 9/11 Verses
saying he ran six blocks for help! "I asked God to give me strength. Awoken Research Group
And I was able to get up and run six blocks to find an exit," Mr. David says. Complete 9/11 Timeline (Paul
Thompson)
Then we have this remarkable TV interview that morning with
Finnish 9/11 Site
Kenny Johannemann. Mr. Johannemann states that he was the one who
helped David, “I dragged a guy off. His skin was hanging. I helped him into
Gallerize
an ambulance” Note that there is no mention of Rodriguez. Wise German Engineers 9/11 site
individuals have suggested that perhaps no one interviewed on TV on 9/11 Hybrideb's 9/11 site
was genuine. Notice how the camera angle changes and zooms in on him, Icelandic 9/11 site
just as he is asked about “terrorism.” The regime had long range plans, and Jane Doe's 9/11 site
a carefully crafted script. Note how Johannemann’s arms flail just like Juscogen's 9/11 site
another 9/11 witness that morning who has been shown to be bogus. He, Killtown
of course, could be telling the truth (and each of you will have to draw your Oil and Empire 9/11 (Mark Robinowitz)
own conclusions), but I cannot find anything on him in recent years. Portland Indy Media 9/11
So we have at least four accounts as follows: Let's Roll 9/11
Rodriquez helped David to an ambulance. Morgan Reynolds WTC Demolition
Essay
Rodriquez carried David to an ambulance. Morgan Reynolds 9/11 Commission
Johannemann helped David to an ambulance. Essay
David ran six blocks to an ambulance. Missile Gate (analysis of 1st hit)
Nerdcities 9/11
Of course, in the shock and excitement of such events, we know that Operation 9/11
accounts can differ, and we cannot make any definitive conclusions in this Planet Quo 9/11
regard.
RINF 9/11 Archive
Now, let us return to Felipe David’s “hanging skin.” What
caused this? It is always possible that some conventional fire or explosives THE TRUTH ABOUT SEPT 11 (Compiled
caused his burns and the hanging skin on his face and arms. But we saw by Gerard Holmgren)
that David himself did not mention “fire.” So we may conclude that it wasn’t Shunned
any direct fire that caused this. A conventional explosive blast could have Physics 911
done this. But this too may not be so likely, as such blasts may be Physics 9/11.co.nr
expected to cause different types of wounds deep into the face and arms. Plague Puppy's Cafe
But that is still a possibility, as is a fire that he just didn’t see. Plague Puppy: Alternate Site
Question 911
Truth 911
That brings us to one possible cause of his hanging skin, that indeed he
Brad's 911 site
couldn’t possibly have seen! That is radiation from a mini-nuke, which may
Club Ivy's 911 site
have just exploded, at that time, in one of the sub-basement levels. One is Brad's old 9/11 site
not capable of seeing the radiation (gamma rays, neutrons) emitted by a Flamesong 9/11 Essay and Links
nuclear blast. One will just feel the heat, then pain and then the skin will be Serendipity (various essays on 9/11)
damaged, and may either be vaporized, charred or hanging—depending on Stop the Lie 9/11
the flux intensity (distance, wavelength/type of the radiation etc. are factors The Strange Images of 9/11/2001
here). This eyewitness account on the survivors of the Total 9/11 Info
Hiroshima nuclear attack describes how common was Unanswered Questions
damaged, hanging skin amongst them. (You can use your “find” function Questions Questions
and search on “hanging.”) The Web Fairy
Wing TV
I assert my following interpretation of Mr. David’s words is the most likely
account of what happened to Mr. David. He hears and feels explosion(s).
9/11 Activism
He doesn’t see any fire coming at him, but is surprised to feel great heat on 9/11 Blogger
his skin, and goes to the floor. He then is further shocked to feel and see 9/11 Citizens' Watch
his skin burned and hanging. All this is very much like what the burn 9/11 Skeptics Unite!
victims of Hiroshima and Nagasaki reported. 911 Truth.org
911 Truth LA.us
Now radiation exposure to the skin should result in significant swelling. But 911 Truth LA.org
we have no photos or videos of Mr. David, until this Youtube video (in 911 Truth Emergence
Spanish) allegedly three months later, when Mr. Rodriguez visits Mr. 911 We Know
David. David’s face does look (still?) a bit swollen, but not much. But this is 911 Truth Movement Musings
allegedly three months later, without any allowed record of what his face, 9-11 Visibility Project
arms and legs looked like until that point in time. Why do we not have any 9-11 UK
photos or video of Mr David until that point in time? Could he have had 9/11 Family Steering Committee
NY 9/11 Truth
massive skin swelling, beginning almost immediately after his skin was

damaged by “something,” possibly radiation from a nuclear blast? Could
they have only trotted Mr. David out after his swelling had come down to a
“normal” level? Summer of Truth
Proposition 911
Finally I note that there seems to be nothing in the public record on Felipe Reopen 911
David for the last five years or so! Even though he “too” could be regarded Deception Dollars
as a “hero.” Why do we not know where he is, and his status? Hopefully Justice for 9/11
Felipe David is OK. Hopefully he did not get cancer, or other medical
problems, or suffer a strange “accident.” Hopefully truly independent
researchers will find him, and get his story direct from him, when he 9/11 Specialty Sites
wouldn’t be surrounded by any public media, or “handlers” from the Team 8 Plus
Flight 93 Hoax
government, or any other interference. With the dearth of information forced
WTC Demolition
upon us, we may ask: Where in the world is Felipe David? What has he
been doing these last five years or so?
9/11 Photo Analysis
And is Felipe David the (only?) radiation survivor of a mini-nuke at the Demolition, the Truth of 9/11 and the
World Trade Center on 9/11? Does he share a kindred experience with WTC
those who were in Hiroshima and Nagasaki in those early days of August 9/11 and the Impossible: the WTC
collapse
1945 that marked the dawn of a new, horrible age? We must recognize
that just like the World Trade Center on 9/11, Hiroshima and Nagasaki Flight 77 FOIA site
were also called…Ground Zero. Flight 93 Crash.com
Pentagon Research
posted by spooked @ 5:15 AM Brad's Pentagon Analysis
9/11 Flash Movies

<< Home 9/11 chronology (network footage)
Buddy Buddy
Pentagon Strike
911 Questions

that question 9/11
Rigorous Intuition
Wing TV
Xymphora
Killtown's Blog
George Washington
Propaganda Matrix
Daniel Hopsicker
Cryptome
World Order News
Good Intro Books to

Griffin
Ray Griffin
Ian Henshall
Webster G. Tarpley
Thompson

Ruppert
Hopsicker

Arctic Beacon

with 9/11
Break for News
Tom Flocco

Buzzflash
The Raw Story
Think Progress
Common Dreams
Consortium News
Cursor
Guerrilla News
Online Journal
The Memory Hole
Press Action
News from Babylon
Unknown News
TV News Lies
Eschaton
Daily Kos
Talking Points Memo
Hullabaloo
Billmon
The Brad Blog
Jesus' General
The Rude Pundit
The Poor Man
Today in Iraq
Antiwar.com
Constant Pated
Clusterfuck Nation
Donkey Rising
Salon
Slate
My Other Blogs
Al-CIA-duh
Ghost Plane
Flight 93 Hoax


Peak Oil and

Oil and Gas
The Oil Drum
Land of Black Gold
Richard Heinberg
Grist

Conspiracy Theory!
World Trade Center Demolition: Eyewitness Testimony of Firefighters Believing They Were Nuked on 9/11

Eyewitness Testimony of Firefighters Believing demolition.
They Were Nuked on 9/11
... as well as early WTC7 Destruction, EMP, non-impact About Me

plane flyby, and people being pushed out of a WTC tower. Name: spooked
By The Anonymous Physicist The official 9/11 story is a lie. The 9/11 plane
Reading just a handful out of the 503 9/11 WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7 towers were brought
WTC initial responders’ testimonies has use of small nuclear bombs in the demolition of
proven to be a real eye-opener. These WTC1 and 2. All in all, 9/11 was a massive and
firefighters’ and EMS officers’ depositions cruel hoax foisted upon the world, done in order
provide good corroboration for many of the financial fraud and to further the ends of the
things I have hypothesized at this blog, global elite. 9/11 was only the most egregious of
including the following: The WTC was
demolished via small nuclear bombs, that View my complete profile
pre-“collapse” basement nukes were set off

in the towers, synchronous with the “plane
hit” explosions above, that there likely were purposes of diversity. I leave it up to
EMP’s (Electromagnetic Pulses from nukes), you to judge their content.)
and that WTC7 underwent early explosions,

and attempted early demolition. General 9/11 Sites
9/11 Blimp
9/11 Busters
9/11 CGI Watch
Firefighter Edward Kennedy here states that he thought a “nuclear bomb” 9/11 Closeup (Gerard Holmgren)
had demolished a tower. “We were on Liberty Street and we came out into 9/11 Complicity
there and it just look like something that -- it looked like a bomb, of course, 9/11 Cover-Up
had gone off, almost like a nuclear bomb... “ 9/11 Dossier (UK)
9/11 Encyclopedia
Here we learn that NYFD Lt. George DeSimone similarly thought the heat-
9/11 Foreknowledge
-without fire--impinging on him was Hiroshima-like:
9/11 Hoax
“I thought it was some kind of thermal explosion where I'm 9/11 Oddities
either going to get burnt -- and I had kind of ideas that it
9/11 Overview
was going to be something like Hiroshima where all this
heat was coming at me and we were going to get burnt…”
9/11 Plot
Several hours after both tower “collapses”, and despite official regime 9/11 Proof
claims of total military and civilian flight termination, he said:
9/11 Resources
"...We saw jets overhead, commercial airliner, military jets, 9/11 Review.org
Air Force jets, and we didn't know what the hell was going 9/11 Review.com
http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2008/10/eyewitness-testimony-of-firefighters.html[07.11.2010 14:51:31]
9/11 Stealth
on..."
9/11 Strike
Recall I have detailed how a nuke’s thermal rays go farthest out, well 9/11 True Story
beyond its destructive blast radius. Here NYFD Chief Jerry Gumbo’s 9/11 "U"
testimony is one of several I have cited, to say he felt heat far away from 9/11 Verses
any actual fire. He stated:
Thompson)
"...At the time of the impact, we were able to feel heat that Finnish 9/11 Site
was generated from the explosion at the command post, Finnish 9/11 Site in English
which was across West Street, and West is fairly large Gallerize
street with that island in there, and debris was showering all German Engineers 9/11 site
over West Street." Hybrideb's 9/11 site
Icelandic 9/11 site
I believe this is again indication of the early basement nuke concomitant Jane Doe's 9/11 site
with the “plane hit” explosion above. Juscogen's 9/11 site
Killtown
Another firefighter who thought the WTC destruction was nuclear is NYFD Oil and Empire 9/11 (Mark Robinowitz)
Lt Richard Smiouskas, whose statement is here. He was an official NYFD Portland Indy Media 9/11
photographer, and has some startling testimony, regarding other matters, 119 Questions about 9/11
as well. It appears that with his telefoto lens, he witnessed people being Let's Roll 9/11
pushed out of tower one. He said: Morgan Reynolds WTC Demolition
Essay
"...I was photographing the fire from the roof. I had a long Essay
lens on the camera, and I had people in the windows. It Missile Gate (analysis of 1st hit)
looked like they were being -- they weren't actually jumping. Nerdcities 9/11
One or two people I saw, they seemed like they were being Operation 9/11
forced out by the people behind them. There was half a Planet Quo 9/11
dozen faces. In between the smoke you could see people..." Rick Siegel (9/11 Eyewitness)
(snip) "I guess they were all trying to get air, and this guy RINF 9/11 Archive
was actually standing in the window, standing in the frame Terrorize (Danish 911 site)
with each hand on each frame and he kind of like got The Mysteries of 9/11
nudged out." by Gerard Holmgren)
Shunned
In the second sentence, it looks like he just stopped himself from saying
Physics 911
“pushed”. The last incident may even indicate the NON-jumper was trying Physics 9/11.co.nr
to keep himself from being pushed out! Plague Puppy's Cafe
Lt. Smiouskas believed that a nuclear bomb went off, due to the magnitude Question 911
of Earth shaking that he felt. As a tower is being destroyed he recalls: Truth 911
Brad's 911 site
"It looked like an earthquake. The ground was shaking. I fell Club Ivy's 911 site
to the floor. My camera bag opened up. The cameras went Brad's old 9/11 site
skidding across the floor…I'm thinking maybe a bomb blew Flamesong 9/11 Essay and Links
up. I'm thinking it could have been a nuclear….” Serendipity (various essays on 9/11)
Stop the Lie 9/11
Then he writes of seeing “glitter” through the black smoke, during tower The Strange Images of 9/11/2001
destruction. Total 9/11 Info
“Everybody started running north, and this huge volume like Questions Questions
ten stories high billowing, pushing black smoke and like a The Web Fairy
glitter. I guess it was glass that was glitter that was in the Wing TV
cloud of smoke.”
I do not believe this “glitter” was glass in the black smoke. Perhaps it is 9/11 Activism
more likely that gamma rays from nuclear explosions which could readily 9/11 Blogger
traverse the black smoke, impinged on his retina. This is like the atronauts 9/11 Citizens' Watch
in earth orbit seeing (retinal) flashes from cosmic rays when they tried to go 9/11 Skeptics Unite!
to a higher earth orbit, and like medical x-rays that go through you and 911 Truth.org
onto a photographic plate. 911 Truth LA.us
911 Truth LA.org
911 Truth Emergence
But note how Lt. Smiouskas found the ground shaking was intense enough
911 We Know
that he surmised (correctly, IMO) that a nuclear bomb went off. Now, I have
been in 5.1 (Richter scale) Earthquakes, and in 2.3’s. The latter I didn’t feel 9-11 Visibility Project
at all, and the 5.1 sounds more like what Lt. Smiouskas (and I) 9-11 UK
experienced—at least a likely 4.0. I also was at the WTC six weeks after 9/11 Family Steering Committee
9/11, and saw many cracked, concrete sidewalks, blocks away from the NY 9/11 Truth
WTC, (as well as experienced my eyes burning from the hot toxic gases still San Francisco 9/11 Truth
emitted.) I therefore make the following assertion. It is likely that the Scholars for 9/11 Truth
“official” 2.1 and 2.3 Richter scale recordings on 9/11 had their spikes cut Community Currency 9/11
off! I have even found that NIST asked for a “re-analysis” of seismic data Summer of Truth
from one observatory before publishing their “findings.” So, just as I Proposition 911
hypothesized about the long-delayed second AVIRIS (WTC temperature) Reopen 911
data set, the seismic recordings were likely doctored by this regime. And Deception Dollars
this fire-fighter’s belief that the intense ground shaking was due to a Justice for 9/11
“nuclear bomb” supports this hypothesis.
The interview of Dr. Michael Guttenberg, of NYFD’s Office of Medical Team 8 Plus
Affairs, who may have witnessed EMP is here. Flight 93 Hoax
WTC Demolition
Just after the second “plane hit” explosion, and before any tower The Ultimate Hijacker Compilation
“collapse”, he noted: 9/11 Photo Analysis
“…on the EMS radio, there was absolute silence for Demolition, the Truth of 9/11 and the
probably 10 or 15 seconds, you know, which to me, it WTC
seemed like 10 to 15 seconds, but it was absolute radio collapse
silence for a few seconds…” WTC Streaking Object, WTC7 theories
Flight 77 FOIA site
Questioner: Flight 93 Crash.com
Pentagon Research
“We were told that the air was so thick with debris that radio
M.G.:
9/11 Flash Movies
“That was after the towers came down.”
Note two things, the radios went dead—likely a sign of EMP, as I have Buddy Buddy
Pentagon Strike
previously described. And see how the questioner attempts to confuse the
911 Questions
issue with a double lie. One, that this happened after a tower was
destroyed, when instead, this is after the second WTC2 “plane hit”
explosion, and before any tower “collapse” as Dr. Guttenberg corrects him. Reasonably reliable "Conspiracy Sites"
And two, that radio waves would have been blocked by a conventional that question 9/11
explosion, when they wouldn’t have been. And note also that this radio Rigorous Intuition
blackout occurred after the second “plane hit” explosion. My previous Wing TV
articles contained evidence, and my hypothesis, that the WTC1 “plane hit” Xymphora
explosion was used as cover for a nearly concomitant basement nuclear Killtown's Blog
bomb explosion that vaporized a 50 ton steel press, and a garage level, The Bulldog Manifesto
and also caused phone outage. So we learn now that electronic Center for an Informed America
communications also were affected after the second “plane hit”, which may George Washington
indicates that they also nuked the basement of WTC2 at that time. I Centre for Research on Globalization
hypothesized that this was done in case the planned, subsequent, intricate,
top-down demolition failed.
Guttenberg also provides more eyewitness testimony for early WTC7 Propaganda Matrix
explosions, as he went to the loading area of WTC7. Daniel Hopsicker
Cryptome
“…We all stuffed ourselves into this hallway [near the
loading dock of WTC7], pulled the door shut, and the noise World Order News
just got very loud and the room filled with dust. The noise Covert 2 Overt Analysis
stopped, and we opened up the door, and everything was
pitch black. The way we got into the loading dock was not
Good Intro Books to
the way we were getting out. It was obstructed.”
This appears to be a watered down way of saying WTC underwent internal "The New Pearl Harbor, Disturbing
explosions. This jives with my earlier article citing Deputy Director of the Questions About the Bush
NYC Emergency Services Dept., Barry Jennings, that the WTC7 underwent Griffin
attempted complete internal destruction at the same time that the first tower "The 9/11 Commission Report:
(and WTC 3, 4, 5, 6) were demolished. My article, on top here Omissions And Distortions" by David
Ray Griffin
hypothesized that fizzled nukes was the reason WTC7 was not successfully 9/11 Revealed by Rowland Morgan and
destroyed during this early coordinated attempt, which Jennings stated Ian Henshall
destroyed much of the lobby, now corroborated by Guttenberg. The last "9/11 Synthetic Terror, Made in USA" by
Webster G. Tarpley
URL also has my earlier articles on nuclear demolition of the WTC. "The Terror Timeline" by Paul
Thompson
NYFD Lt. Robert Larocco here also noted that tower destruction seemed "Crossing the Rubicon" by Michael C.
Ruppert
“nuclear” to him. He said,
Hopsicker
“Of course the cloud was kind of like a nuclear winter thing.
You're walking through fallout.”
Near the towers, but BEFORE either tower “collapse”, he noted: that I have significant issues with
“As I started walking onto the side street – actually as I From the Wilderness (Mike Ruppert)
stepped onto the side street, the strangest thing I noticed Arctic Beacon
was there was like three inches of snow on the ground. The
snow was probably pulverized concrete, sheetrock, loose
tiles, insulation, asbestos or what-have-you.” Unreliable "Conspiracy Sites" that deal
with 9/11
Now this fine ash or 3 inches of snow-like “pulverized concrete” as he Break for News
called it would not occur from a “plane hit” or conventional explosives. Tom Flocco
Could this fine, 3 inches of “snow” be from the early basement nukes I
have written about? Like the WTC1 basement blast that vaporized a steel
press, and a parking garage level that eyewitnesses said was just “gone.” Democratic/Progressive News Sites,
Buzzflash
Now some DEW/OCT disinfo agents claim that the tower destruction was
The Raw Story
not loud because their hangout was not loud. During the commencement of
WTC2 destruction, Lt. Larocco stated:
Think Progress
“The next second I heard that loudest noise in the world that
I was describing before getting louder and louder.” (snip) “It
Common Dreams
was the loudest noise I've ever heard in my life. It was in
Consortium News
both ears. Kind of like those rockets that they launch the Center for Cooperative Research
space shuttles with, it was like I had one going off in each Cursor
ear. When I thought it was the loudest noise I ever heard, Guerrilla News
every second it was just increasing getting louder and louder Online Journal
and louder.” The Memory Hole
Lt Larocco also describes very personal feelings of fear of death, and Press Action
fellow firefighters “crying like babies” during and just after collapse. These News from Babylon
revelations prove that the redactions in the published Unknown News
responders’ statements were not because of wanting to hide TV News Lies
the most personal of feelings. After Downing Street
Eschaton
Lt. Larocco also stated that hours after both towers were destroyed: Daily Kos
Talking Points Memo
“…I still really didn't believe that the second tower was hit by Hullabaloo
a second plane.” Billmon
The Brad Blog
At this point, the interviewer, Monte Feiler, says, “Stopping the interview at Jesus' General
1306.” Then, “Resuming the tape at 1308 hours. Same people present.” The Rude Pundit
The Poor Man
Now Lt. Larocco says: “ Juan Cole (Informed Comment)
Today in Iraq
Like I said, the rumors were flying around, and they turned Antiwar.com
out to be quite factual, about the second tower getting hit. Iraq Coalition Casualties
Although at the time I really didn't believe it until I saw it later Constant Pated
on television. The thing about the Pentagon, the plane Clusterfuck Nation
crashing out in Pennsylvania, it was all coming into the Donkey Rising
picture that this is something major going on.” Salon
Slate
So we see how something happened during this “time out.” Something he
was told and recalling what was “on TV” apparently made him change his
My Other Blogs
mind and believe in the second “plane hit.” This manipulation speaks for
itself. And if there really were plane hits, would the PTB need to perform THE WORST PRESIDENT EVER!!!!
such blatent manipulations of eyewitness testimony? Bush Administration War Criminals
Finally I note that when he was making his way out after “collapse,” Lt. Al-CIA-duh
Larocco recalls: Ghost Plane
Flight 93 Hoax
“I thought to myself this is a locked exit. That's illegal.”
We see, as some survivors have noted, many fire escape exits were
locked. Someone--who may have had a master key--apparently locked
numerous exits. If such a man is ascertained, and his actions proven to be
deliberate, he should be charged with mass murder.
My interpretation of EMT Frank Puma’s deposition here indicates that he

may have witnessed a FLYBY, and not a “plane impact” regarding the
alleged “second hit.” He said:
“…I ran down to the corner of Church and Park Place,

looked up and I saw the plane shooting out of the top of the
towers. That's when I grabbed for my radio and yelled over
the air, "1 Adam. A bomb just went off in the Trade
Center."...
Note that after he witnessed an apparent flyby, HE CALLED IN A BOMB,

and NOT a plane impact! In fact, when you couple his statement to the
interviewer, with his action of exactly what he called in, it seems clear that
he believed the plane he saw bombed the WTC! And this must be
considered a possibility. However, all the evidence and the ludicrous
“plane-shaped” hole itself indicate shape charges, at that facade, were set
off in sync with a flyby (and basement nukes).
Finally, for those who grasp the deeper conspiracies I have elucidated
here, I note that Firefighter Michael Wernick here stated the number of
the Fire Engine that apparently responded first to the WTC, on 9/11.
Wernick said, “Engine 33 went first.” As I have written here before, Interesting Mainstream Articles on 9/11
“All things nuclear…” Boston Globe 11/23/01 piece
posted by spooked @ 9:24 AM Flight 93 article and picture gallery

<< Home US National Debt Clock
Peak Oil and

Oil and Gas
The Oil Drum
Land of Black Gold
Richard Heinberg
Grist

Conspiracy Theory!
World Trade Center Demolition: More Evidence & Testimony Indicating Nuclear Blasts, Nuclear Radiation, & China Syndrome at the WTC

Friday, August 24, 2007 trade center buildings 1, 2
More Evidence & Testimony Indicating Nuclear demolition.
Blasts, Nuclear Radiation, & China Syndrome at the
WTC
About Me
By The Anonymous Physicist Name: spooked
Sgt. Matthew Tartaglia, a WTC responder, rescue worker, counselor, and
FEMA consultant has made many remarkable statements The official 9/11 story is a lie. The 9/11 plane
related to the nuking of the WTC, and its China Syndrome hijackings and crashes were clever hoaxes. The
aftermath. WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7 towers were brought
Tartaglia, said he believes “tactical nukes” took down the towers, and was use of small nuclear bombs in the demolition of
responsible for the high temperatures weeks and months later (but does WTC1 and 2. All in all, 9/11 was a massive and
not know of the existence of the China Syndrome.) His statements include cruel hoax foisted upon the world, done in order
these: “…There were only certain parts of the site that you could not legally to spark the obscene "war on terror", to cover up
leave without going through decontamination.…They would tackle you and financial fraud and to further the ends of the
take your camera away. I watched people be tackled.” Most responders global elite. 9/11 was only the most egregious of
couldn’t go “down in the garages…The rescue people – when our clothes several other recent false-flag terror operations.
got so contaminated, we were told not to bring our clothes off that site.
Don’t wear anything on the site you’re not prepared to leave there because
it’s contaminated.” Note that “discarding clothing”, and “going through
decontamination” are standard nuclear industry methods of dealing with More 9/11 Links (Note: I present a wide
radiation-exposed individuals. I do not know if other industries necessitate variety of 9/11 sites here for the
the use of these methods as well. purposes of diversity. I leave it up to
In 2005, Sgt. Tartaglia said, “My teeth are falling out.” Like hanging skin
resulting from a nuclear bomb, teeth falling out is a common symptom,
General 9/11 Sites
months or years later, from nuclear radiation exposure. (Other factors can
9/11 Blimp
also possibly cause this, but are less likely.) Read about this Army
9/11 Busters
veteran sent to Hiroshima, just days after it was nuked, to
9/11 CGI Watch
bulldoze roads. This was apparently much too soon to send Americans
in to Hiroshima, but the PTB apparently cared as much about Americans, 9/11 Complicity
as they did about the Japanese women and children who were nuked. I 9/11 Cover-Up
note that after the July 16, 1945 Trinity “A-Bomb” test, Dr. J. Robert 9/11 Dossier (UK)
Oppenheimer and General Leslie Groves did not return to
9/11 Encyclopedia
Ground Zero until five weeks later on Sept 11, 1945. Yes,
there is 9/11 again. So man did not walk again on the first alleged Ground 9/11 Foreknowledge
Zero which resulted from the “Manhattan Project” until 9/11/45. Also read 9/11 Hoax
here about 3 veterans of atomic bomb tests in Nevada in the 1950’s who 9/11 Oddities
had their teeth fall out within a few years of their radiation exposure. [To
9/11 Overview
quickly find the 3 veterans cited, search on “teeth.”] That article also
indicates that the gov’t lied to them as to the amount of radiation they had 9/11 Plot
received. It is excerpted from the book, “They Never Knew: The Victims of 9/11 Proof
Atomic Testing”, [not read here] by Glenn Alan Cheney. See also “The 9/11 Research (Jim Hoffman)
Plutonium Files” by Welsome, and the two books on the “Making of the A- 9/11 Resources
Bomb”, and the H-Bomb, “Dark Sun”, both by Rhodes--all three read here. 9/11 Review.org
9/11 Review.com
http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2007/08/more-evidence-testimony-indicating.html[07.11.2010 14:52:15]
But please read this (portions of the book, They Never Knew) in its 9/11 Stealth
entirety. It includes the following remarkable quote that may be very 9/11 Strike
relevant to 9/11 research. A whistleblower came forward decades later 9/11 True Story
about the actual radiation exposure Army personnel were subjected to. “In 9/11 "U"
1982, a former Army medic, Van R. Brandon, admitted that he had been 9/11 Verses
ordered to keep two sets of books. "One set was to show that no one Awoken Research Group
received an exposure above the approved dosimeter reading," he said. Thompson)
"The other set of books was to show what the actual reading was. That set Finnish 9/11 Site
of books was brought in a locked briefcase attached to [an officer]'s wrist Finnish 9/11 Site in English
by a set of handcuffs every morning." Army personnel were denied medical Gallerize
benefits and disability because the regime publicly used the “cooked” book. German Engineers 9/11 site
Do you think this same govt has gotten more or less evil, corrupt, and Hybrideb's 9/11 site
duplicitous, in the ensuing decades--and in a matter that relates to possibly Icelandic 9/11 site
irradiating tens of thousands of WTC workers, responders, and near-by Jane Doe's 9/11 site
residents. Juscogen's 9/11 site
Killtown
The statements made by Mike Pecoraro, a WTC1 stationary
engineer, and 9/11 survivor, are also remarkable. Pecoraro first knew
something was wrong after observing flickering lights (EMP?), and then he
Let's Roll 9/11
ascended to the sub-basement C level, from below. He says, "There was Morgan Reynolds WTC Demolition
nothing there but rubble, we're talking about a 50 ton hydraulic press Essay
gone!" Pecoraro and a co-worker “made their way to the parking garage, Morgan Reynolds 9/11 Commission
Essay
but found that it, too, was gone”… As they ascended to the B Level, one
floor above, they “were astonished to see a steel and concrete fire door
Nerdcities 9/11
that weighed about 300 pounds, wrinkled up like a piece of aluminum foil" Operation 9/11
and lying on the floor. Now I assert that this too is a likely sign that a Planet Quo 9/11
nuclear bomb went off. Perhaps only the multi-million degree temperature Rick Siegel (9/11 Eyewitness)
at the hypocenter, or neutron bombardment, is capable of doing that to that RINF 9/11 Archive
heavy steel door. The article continues: “"They got us again,"” Mike told his Terrorize (Danish 911 site)
co-worker, referring to the terrorist attack at the center in 1993. Having The Mysteries of 9/11
been through that bombing, Mike recalled seeing similar things happen to THE TRUTH ABOUT SEPT 11 (Compiled
by Gerard Holmgren)
the building's structure.” This last statement from Pecoraro, I assert may be
Shunned
corroboration of nuclear engineer/geologist Phil Schneider’s statement that
Physics 911
his inspection of the 1993 WTC explosion damage revealed to him that it
Physics 9/11.co.nr
was a nuclear blast, that may have gone awry, that is, was insufficient. Plague Puppy's Cafe
(See my previous articles at wtcdemolition.blogspot.com.) Pecoraro states Plague Puppy: Alternate Site
that as WTC2 “collapsed,” “there was a wind that came through the Question 911
revolving doors that blew me [in the WTC1 lobby area] 100 feet to the far Truth 911
wall” Was this a nuclear pressure blast? You’ve probably seen the videos Brad's 911 site
of A-bomb test sites, and resultant winds blowing down model houses, and Club Ivy's 911 site
heat causing fires. Like this and this. Brad's old 9/11 site
More evidence of the likely nuking of the WTC, and China Syndrome Serendipity (various essays on 9/11)
aftermath, comes from no less than CNN’s Larry King Show. This show Stop the Lie 9/11
aired on 10/6/01, and was taped at the WTC, and a nearby burn unit, in the The Strange Images of 9/11/2001
days prior to the air-date. The transcript is here. Total 9/11 Info
Questions Questions
Regarding the likely China Syndrome of high heat three weeks later,
The Web Fairy
Thomas Von Essen, NYC Fire Commissioner, says, at the WTC, “…it's so
Wing TV
hot, it's a really hot fire. The steel has been hot for three weeks now.
Tremendous heat below, you know. It's -- the fire is not out down below.”
From my earlier articles, you know that this went on for at least six months 9/11 Activism
after 9/11. 9/11 Blogger
At the Weill Burn Center at the Cornell Medical Hospital, Larry King 9/11 Skeptics Unite!
interviews two women who received burns—without any fire--while trying to 911 Truth.org
flee WTC1. 911 Truth LA.us
911 Truth LA.org
911 Truth Emergence
King: “So, did you know you were on fire, in a sense?”
911 We Know
Yang: “No, I wasn't on fire, I think it was from the heat.“
9-11 UK
Mary Jo: “That's what we were told, it was the heat.” 9/11 Family Steering Committee
NY 9/11 Truth
So like Felipe David, like the Hiroshima survivors, these two women have

no clue as to why their skin was burned. And who told them “it was from Scholars for 9/11 Truth
the heat”? And if it was the doctors, who told them to say this to the Community Currency 9/11
patients? Note that King says “…fire in a sense.” I assert that that sense is Summer of Truth
not fire per se, but bombardment by radiation (thermal rays, gamma rays, Proposition 911
neutrons) that can cause heat at the skin, and damage the skin--if the flux Reopen 911
is large enough (relevant parameters include distance, shielding, intensity Deception Dollars
and type of radiation). Justice for 9/11
King also interviews burn victim Brian Reeves, a security guard starting his 9/11 Specialty Sites
rounds in the lobby of one of the towers. Reeves says: “I don't know when I Team 8 Plus
got burned, but I just know when it knocked me over, there was -- there was Flight 93 Hoax
something, the windows blew out. And when the windows blew out, I was WTC Demolition
on the ground, and like I said, there was a gust of wind. And when I The Ultimate Hijacker Compilation
opened my eyes, I seen a bright orange light.” Reeves, feeling heat on his 9/11 Photo Analysis
back, takes his jacket off and falls on the ground while fleeing. There is the Evidence of Explosives on 9/11
issue of whether his jacket is on fire or not. [Months later, the media would Demolition, the Truth of 9/11 and the
WTC
morph the “bright orange light” into “fireball.”] We must ask, did Reeves
see the flash of, and receive the radiation, and air pressure blast from, a collapse
mini-nuke? Like the Hiroshima victims, he knows there had to be WTC Streaking Object, WTC7 theories
“something” but he/they didn’t see what burned him/them. In this video, Flight 77 FOIA site
months after 9/11, Reeves then says “the fire was this close to my face” Flight 93 Crash.com
(and holds his hand near his face). He did not say any such thing 2-3 Pentagon Research
weeks after 9/11, when interviewed by King. Brad's Pentagon Analysis
Getting back to the King show, Dr. Roger Yurt of the Weill Burn Center
says, “[Reeve’s] worst burns were on his back, some burns up on his 9/11 Flash Movies
head. Burns on your arms also.” My possible interpretation is the following. 9/11 chronology (network footage)
Likely his jacket was not on fire (note the burns on his head), and the Buddy Buddy
jacket likely shielded him from receiving even more radiation! The source of Pentagon Strike
which was apparently behind him, as his burns were mostly on his back, 911 Questions
but also on his head. But if the flux of radiation is high enough, a person
and/or their clothes will catch fire from the radiation. Many Hiroshima
victims were immediately killed and left in a charred state. The “bright Reasonably reliable "Conspiracy Sites"
orange flash” he “saw” may well have been a flux of radiation onto his that question 9/11
retina. This kind of thing is again known from Army veterans of the nuclear Rigorous Intuition
Wing TV
blasts in Nevada in the 1950’s. In the worst cases, numerous Army
Xymphora
personnel were forced to be, in ditches, only a football field away from an
Killtown's Blog
atomic bomb going off!
But when Brian tells his story months later, the reporter adds “fireball” George Washington
several times in her telling the story. Even the direction of the alleged Centre for Research on Globalization
fireball is cleverly, and falsely, inserted: “… a fireball that roared down the Prison Planet (Alex Jones)
elevator shaft.” In actuality, from numerous lobby, and sub-basement Daily Two Minutes of Hate
witnesses, a non-fireball, a likely nuclear detonation, occurred below the The Emperor's New Clothes
lobby, and its effects traveled UP a few floors—and not down some 80-90 Public Action (Carol Valentine)
floors from the likely conventional explosion above. In any case, Reeves Propaganda Matrix
did not observe what may, or may not, have been traversing the elevator Daniel Hopsicker
shaft. It appears that in the telling of the 9/11 survivors’ accounts, the MSM, Cryptome
and the 911 pseudo-truth media, are doing everything they can to add Crimes and Corruptions of the New
World Order News
“fire” and “fireball” to the later retelling of numerous survivors’ tales. And Covert 2 Overt Analysis
these survivors, who did not report “fire” initially, and not knowing about
such things as radiation-induced burns—without any fire—may later start
including this in their own accounts, after doctors, or reporters, or hidden Good Intro Books to
(or not so hidden) handlers either keep repeating the “fire” and “fireball” Alternative 9/11 Truth
memes to them; or perhaps in some cases threatening/rewarding the "The New Pearl Harbor, Disturbing
survivors to start telling it the way their handlers demand. Never forget how Questions About the Bush
FBI, or secret service agents, both on the scene in Dallas and later during Griffin
depositions, threatened eyewitnesses to President Kennedy’s "The 9/11 Commission Report:
assassination, if they either said they clearly saw the Secret Omissions And Distortions" by David
Ray Griffin
Service driver do it, or that there also were shots from the grassy 9/11 Revealed by Rowland Morgan and
knoll. Experts in eyewitness testimony tell us that the most accurate Ian Henshall
account is the closest in time to the event. "9/11 Synthetic Terror, Made in USA" by
Webster G. Tarpley
Remember how sub-basement, 9/11 burn victim Felipe David’s own Thompson
accounting never mentions “fire” or “fireball,” but his alleged rescuer, "Crossing the Rubicon" by Michael C.
Ruppert
William Rodriquez added fire or fireball to his accounting of
David’s experiences. You will have to be the judge after reading Hopsicker
survivors’ accounts shortly after the event, and then months later after
media/(govt?) interviews. This is a crucial point in the likely tampering of
witnesses to a heinous crime. It is particularly odious as this may be "Conspiracy Sites" that deal with 9/11
ongoing from deep-cover intel assets in the major, AND internet “truth”, that I have significant issues with
media. But if the government/media had nothing to fear, or cover-up, why What Really Happened
do they have to change so many burn victims’ testimonies? Likewise they From the Wilderness (Mike Ruppert)
Arctic Beacon
are frequently inserting “plane hits” into statements, when the witness
couldn’t possibly have seen that, even if the plane hits were real, instead of
CGI. Unreliable "Conspiracy Sites" that deal
with 9/11
I believe we are only scratching the surface regarding evidence of the use Break for News
of mini-nukes on 9/11. Many fire and police witnesses fear losing their jobs, Tom Flocco
or their pensions. Beginning a month after 9/11, NYC Fire Commissioner
von Essen’s office took depositions of 503 fire personnel, port authority
police and EMT first responders. The report is 12,000 pages long and Democratic/Progressive News Sites,
rarely read [and not read here]. It was deliberately excluded from Blogs and Miscellaneous Links
the 911 Commission, and NIST, reports (scroll down at link). Buzzflash
The Raw Story
Could they be hiding evidence, not of the widely known
explosions/controlled demolition, but specifically of the nuking of the towers
and 3000 people? After von Essen’s 503 witness interviews, former CIA
Think Progress
director Robert Woolsey, was inserted into this in 2002, as the NYC Fire Citizens for a Legitimate Government
Department's “Anti-terrorism Consultant.” (It’s interesting that Wikipedia Common Dreams
omits this job in his bio.) He issued a gag order, under threat of job loss Consortium News
and worse, down the ranks, under the guise of “anti-terrorism.” This report Center for Cooperative Research
is the one that includes EMT, Patricia Ondrovic’ [See my articles on her Cursor
here] heavily redacted, but remarkable interview. Recall my analysis Guerrilla News
demonstrated she witnessed Electromagnetic Pulse from a nuclear bomb Online Journal
causing flickering lights and making cars catch fire, for no apparent reason The Memory Hole
(“toasted cars”), right near her, and also jets shooting down other jets in the Information Clearing House
sky over the Hudson. Was Woolsey in charge of the redacting, of her, and Press Action
other, testimony? I make the assertion that the very purpose of interviewing News from Babylon
these 503 9/11 witnesses and responders was to find out who had Unknown News
TV News Lies
witnessed evidence of the nuking of the WTC, and to then threaten, and
silence them! Perhaps too many to kill, so first try to silence them! Here
Eschaton
are the full 503 interviews. It would be good if some real 911
Daily Kos
researcher could read them all or search for when portions are redacted. Talking Points Memo
Note my scanning them indicates that numerous witnesses report Hullabaloo
“explosions;” this was not reason enough for redaction! Billmon
The Brad Blog
There is other eyewitness (or should I say skinwitness) evidence, I believe Jesus' General
of the heat, and radiation, wave which emanates outwards from a nuclear The Rude Pundit
blast from numerous people who happened to be in the vicinity of the The Poor Man
towers. This article states that “John Axisa, who was getting off a Juan Cole (Informed Comment)
commuter train to the World Trade Center, …[after the alleged first plane Today in Iraq
hit]… Then there was a second explosion, and he felt heat on the back of Antiwar.com
[his] neck.” Note the timing of the “second” explosion he heard--nothing Iraq Coalition Casualties
from which was seen exiting the building--and yet he felt the heat at that Constant Pated
Clusterfuck Nation
exact time! This again could only be from a nuke, I assert. (The DEW
Donkey Rising
hangout theorists always say their alleged DEW is cold.) Also at a 911
Salon
forum, a forum administrator named Quest noted that, “I have an
Slate
acquaintance who was a NYC cop on 9/11 when the second tower came
down. He was 3 blocks away and told me there was "incredible heat"
during the "collapse".” Heat indeed is the thing that would be felt furthest My Other Blogs
out from a nuclear blast. Read this account of physicist, Dr. Phillip Humint Events Online
Morrison 10 miles from the Trinity nuclear test site. He said, "Suddenly, not THE WORST PRESIDENT EVER!!!!
only was there a bright light, but where we were, 10 miles away, there was Bush Administration War Criminals
the heat of the sun on our faces.” [This was before the Sun came up.] So Fake Opposition Democrats
we see the similarity of statements, regarding heat during a nuclear blast, Al-CIA-duh
made by the Trinity witness, John Axisa, Quest’s policeman, Felipe David, Ghost Plane
Flight 93 Hoax
and the three burn victims interviewed by Larry King. I have written that the
nukes used on 9/11 were 1/100th to 1/1000th (each) of the intensity of the
Trinity blast (with several per tower used, and only one per smaller WTC
buildings) and we also have some shielding by the building. So the

distance that radiation would be able to propagate would be vastly less
than the 10 miles felt by Dr. Morrison (noted above), where the test was in
the open air. Those in the towers, and nearby, would indeed be bombarded
by the (unseen) radiation from a mini-nuke. Given these ideas from this
physicist, who has taught physics at several universities, can Quest please
further interview his cop friend, and get back to us here at comments, or
via email to Spooked?
There has been at least one study published of WTC responders’

medical problems treated on scene, from 9/14/01 to 11/20/1, at the WTC.
This was published in May-June, 2005, of “Prehospital and Disaster
Medicine,” and was authored by: K.R. Peritt, W.L. Boal, and “The Helix
Group, Inc.” This third “author” listed is a media corporation. (I did not know
that corporations, per se, could now be authors?) This study related to a 10
week period whereby a Federal govt agency, the “United States Public
Health Service (USPHS), deployed Disaster Medical Assistance Teams
(DMATs) and the Commissioned Corps to provide on-site, primary medical
care to anyone who presented.” The authors conclusion admits, the
“USPHS visits probably were skewed to milder complaints when compared
to analyses of employer medical department reports or hospital cases…”
This appears to mean that the more serious cases went straight to the
hospital. There were 9,349 on-site patient visits, which included some
surrounding residents. There were 30 cases of nausea and vomiting. Let
us look at skin conditions reported. There were 253 1st or 2nd degree
burns, of which 107 (42%) were said to be related to equipment use. There
is no word on what caused the other 58% of these burns. In addition, there Flight 93 and New Baltimore piece
are 132 cases of “other” skin problems reported. There is not a single case Flight 93 article and picture gallery
of third degree burns (the most serious), and no comment on this lack!
Were there people with more serious burns that went straight to the
hospital, and thus are not counted? There are some curious statistics: Miscellaneous Items of Interest
“Other injury or illness: 696 cases,” and “Not classifiable as an injury or CNN infiltrated by US Army Psy-ops
illness: 920 cases.” That’s quite a lot of cases that are either “other” or “not US National Debt Clock
classifiable,” about 17%. Why such a high percentage? They’re not The American Taliban
“psychological” because they reported 78 cases of this. Is any medical
condition being covered up? Did they test for radiation which is not Peak Oil and
mentioned? And what caused the 146 cases of burns that were not due to Sustainability/Environmental Sites
equipment handling? And how many people had third degree burns among The Association for the Study of Peak
the responders? Or is this classified information, related to what really was Oil and Gas
happening at the WTC, even after its demolition? This study is very The Oil Drum
troubling, and looks very “doctored.” Land of Black Gold
In conclusion now, this article, and my previous articles archived at Life After the Oil Crash
Richard Heinberg
wtcdemolition.blogspot.com and wtc-ChinaSyndrome.blogspot.com indicate
Grist
the following. The proven existence of mini-nukes and micro-nukes ,
the massive outward explosions seen, the vaporization of a steel press, the
wrinkling into “foil” of a steel door, spherical blast wave destruction, the The Official 9/11 Story IS a
“nuclear meteorite,[parts of 4 storeys fused together at extreme temp.,]” the Conspiracy Theory!
feeling of heat without fire of numerous witnesses, the burned or hanging
skin--without fire, the responders’ teeth later falling out, the vaporized people conspiring to commit a crime. The official
building contents, the 1157 vaporized people, the massive evidence of the 9/11 narrative, as codified by the 9/11
China Syndrome of resultant nuclear reacting fragments causing the very likely explanation for the events of 9/11/01. The
high heat and molten steel witnessed by many at least six months after official 9/11 story is therefore a theory. This
9/11, and photographed, the clothing discarding, and decontamination "CONSPIRACY THEORY"!
procedures, my detailed explanation of Ondrovic’ account of
Electromagnetic Pulse and resultant car fire, and the door exploding into
her as WTC 5, 6, were being exploded from within, near her, the micro- or
nano-fine particle size, and much more, all indicate the federal regime set I have no fondness for any religion, as I think it
off numerous mini-nuclear bombs in the WTC on 9/11. The witnesses that Islamic terrorists do exist and I detest them as
my articles have cited, included numerous WTC workers, numerous much as I detest the true perpetrators of 9/11.
firefighters, EMT worker, responders, stationary engineer, fire engineering patsies in 9/11, as part of a highly organized
professor, top British and American Structural Engineers who have been goverment and US military.
shown “secret” photos denied to the rest of us, NYC Commissioner, NYC
Fire Commissioner, policeman, and others. Many (or the vast majority of
the 503 who were found) other on-scene witnesses have—for the moment
—likely been silenced, as detailed herein—which is witness tampering, and
worse. Scientific data have also been cited, including —AVIRIS, LIDAR,
seismic readings before “collapse”, Tritium finding (UCAL/Berkeley, and
subsequent Tahil study), and the now exploding number of “rare” cancers
among responders, including thyroid, leukemia, and lymph cancer—all
common among radiation victims. Other data, I have asserted has been
altered, or is totally hidden--second long-delayed AVIRIS data set, and the
lack of any further AVIRIS released.
I assert and accuse— J’Accuse”—that the preponderance of this evidence

demonstrates that the federal government of the United States of America
did explode nuclear bombs inside most of the WTC buildings on 9/11/01.
Furthermore, there was a resultant China Syndrome (through mechanisms
detailed here by me previously) of nuclear reacting fragments releasing
ionizing radiation, and high heat, for at least six months after 9/11, causing
molten steel, and radiation exposure to thousands of responders and NYC
residents. This was an act of treason, conspiracy, mass murder, genocide,
and a ruse for waging war on innocent peoples around the world—crimes
against humanity, and a ruse for blatantly eradicating American citizens
freedoms and rights. The 9/11 WTC nuclear holocaust was not likely even
the first time the American regime did this to its own citizens! Too few
people know of this research into the American government’s probable
nuking of American sailors in 1944.
The 9/11 perpetrators have used, and are using, limited hangouts and
psyops to keep the people from knowing this. These hangouts, ultimately
from the U.S. regime’s “intelligence” agencies, include the bogus “theories”
of the official planes/fuel/gravity/pancaking nonsense, and also thermite,
DEW, and Depleted Uranium [D.U.] (any uranium used on 9/11 at the
WTC, and the China Syndrome aftermath, would have been highly
enriched, not depleted). The observed American military helicopters and
planes directing the initial explosions, and the final nuclear destruction
prove that this was not done by Arabs, Muslims, Iranians, Israelis,
Russians, or Chinese. As with the Kennedy Assassination, this massive set
of actions, and massive cover-up, could only have been perpetrated by the
so-called government of the United States, and not by any small “rogue
elements” therein. Complicit in the original act, and/or its cover-up, are all
the branches of the federal government, its military, and intelligence
agencies, and the Main Stream Media, and even much of the so-called
alternative or internet media which is also laden with intel agents posing as
“truthers,” while pushing the hangouts listed above. The people of the
world must get together, in what may be their final hour, and act literally to
save themselves from extermination, from the handful of monsters that
control humanity. Nature has demonstrated that individuals
trained to be fearful can all come together, and overcome
this fear, and act and defeat the small number who had
previously seemed to be so invincible and bloodthirsty. We
are indeed likewise in the jaws of these monsters, and have been for a
long time; but likewise again, it is still possible to break free, and be free.
We must try. Like this last video, there are so many more of us, than of
them.
<< Home
World Trade Center Demolition: Proof of the Existence of Mini-Nukes and Micro-Nukes
Proof of the Existence of Mini-Nukes and Micro-

Nukes
From the Anonymous Physicist
More and more people are realizing that other theories proposed could not
have destroyed the WTC, and are limited hangouts. As more people realize
that the WTC was likely demolished via small nuclear bombs (likely with
subsidiary conventional explosives), some are now claiming that milli-
nukes (mini-nukes), or micro-nukes don’t even exist. Spooked and I have
addressed this issue before. Here first is proof of the “Nuclear
rifle” from the 1950’s, no less.
The .01 kiloton (kt) TNT equivalent is about 1/1000th of the Hiroshima
(20KT) blast. And here is a govt scientist, Peter Leitner, PhD,
speaking to a Congressional Committee, in 1998. This is proof
of nuclear bombs down into the range of “several pounds of TNT.” He
stated, “These experiments involve the ACTUAL TESTING of extremely
low-yield fission devices (as low as the equivalent of several pounds of
TNT) within a confined environment.” Several pounds of TNT is equivalent
to about 1/10,000,000th (one ten millionth) of the Hiroshima blast. Thus the
U.S. Govt admitted having micro-nukes, and beyond in 1998. Note that this
public admission stated that the testing was done “in a controlled
environment.”
Clearly, the gov't has had milli-nukes and micro-nukes for some time.
http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2007/08/proof-of-existence-of-mini-nukes-and.html[07.11.2010 14:53:49]
World Trade Center Demolition: Brief Evidence of Nuclear bombs used at the WTC on 9/11/01

Friday, August 24, 2007 trade center buildings 1, 2
Brief Evidence of Nuclear bombs used at the WTC demolition.
on 9/11/01
From the Anonymous Physicist, extracted from here. About Me

Name: spooked
-- the proven existence of mini-nukes and micro-nukes Location: United States
-- massive outward explosions as seen in videos of the towers' "collapses" The official 9/11 story is a lie. The 9/11 plane
-- the vaporization of a large steel press in the WTC basement WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7 towers were brought
-- the wrinkling into “foil” of a steel/concrete door use of small nuclear bombs in the demolition of
-- the spherical blast wave destruction cruel hoax foisted upon the world, done in order
-- the “nuclear meteorite” (a chunk of WTC debris with 4 floors fused financial fraud and to further the ends of the
together) global elite. 9/11 was only the most egregious of
-- the feeling of heat without fire of numerous witnesses
-- the burned or hanging skin (Felipe David), without fire, like so many
Hiroshima victims More 9/11 Links (Note: I present a wide
-- the responders’ teeth later falling out (Tartaglia), like numerous American purposes of diversity. I leave it up to
Army A-Bomb test veterans/victims you to judge their content.)
-- the missing, presumably vaporized, building contents

General 9/11 Sites
-- the missing, presumably vaporized 1157 people, unaccounted for at 9/11 Blimp
Ground Zero 9/11 Busters
9/11 CGI Watch
-- the massive evidence of the China Syndrome of resultant nuclear
9/11 Complicity
reacting fragments causing the very high heat and molten steel witnessed
9/11 Cover-Up
(and photographed) by so many firefighter and responders at least six 9/11 Dossier (UK)
months after 9/11
9/11 Encyclopedia
-- the clothing discarding from rescue workers 9/11 Foreknowledge
9/11 Hoax
-- the decontamination procedures of rescue workers 9/11 Oddities
9/11 Overview
-- EMT Ondrovic’s account of Electromagnetic Pulse and instantaneous
resultant car fire, and the door exploding into her as WTC 5,6, were being
9/11 Plot
exploded from within, near her (explained here)
9/11 Proof
-- the micro- or nano-fine particle debris/dust size 9/11 Resources
9/11 Review.org
-- much more, all indicate the federal regime set off numerous mini-nuclear 9/11 Review.com
bombs in the WTC on 9/11.
http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2007/08/evidence-of-nuclear-bombs-used-at-wtc.html[07.11.2010 14:54:10]
9/11 Stealth
9/11 Strike
9/11 True Story
9/11 "U"
The witnesses for nukes that my articles have cited, included: 9/11 Verses
-- numerous WTC workers, including Felipe David, Complete 9/11 Timeline (Paul
Thompson)
Finnish 9/11 Site
-- numerous firefighters, including Bronx firefighter Joe O’Toole Finnish 9/11 Site in English
Gallerize
-- EMT worker Patricia Ondrovic German Engineers 9/11 site
-- numerous first responders, including Sgt. Matthew Tartaglia Icelandic 9/11 site
-- WTC stationary engineer Pecoraro Juscogen's 9/11 site
Killtown
-- fire engineering professor Dr. Barnett Oil and Empire 9/11 (Mark Robinowitz)
-- top British and American Structural Engineers including Keith Eaton, PhD
Let's Roll 9/11
who were shown “secret” molten steel photos denied to the rest of us
Essay
-- Leslie E. Robertson, {American] Structural Engineer (and partial designer Morgan Reynolds 9/11 Commission
of WTC) Essay
Nerdcities 9/11
-- Kenneth Holden NYC Commissioner
Operation 9/11
Planet Quo 9/11
-- Thomas von Essen, NYC Fire Commissioner Rick Siegel (9/11 Eyewitness)
RINF 9/11 Archive
-- policeman: many (or the vast majority of the 503 who were found) Terrorize (Danish 911 site)
-- other on-scene witnesses have—- for the moment—likely have been THE TRUTH ABOUT SEPT 11 (Compiled
silenced, as detailed herein—- which is witness tampering, and worse. by Gerard Holmgren)
Shunned
Physics 911
Physics 9/11.co.nr
Plague Puppy's Cafe
Scientific data have also been cited, including —
Question 911
-- AVIRIS, Truth 911
Brad's 911 site
-- LIDAR, Club Ivy's 911 site
-- seismic readings before “collapse”, Flamesong 9/11 Essay and Links
-- Tritium finding (UCAL/Berkeley, and subsequent Tahil study) Stop the Lie 9/11
-- the now exploding number of “rare” CANCERS among responders, Total 9/11 Info
including thyroid, leukemia, and lymph cancer—all common among Unanswered Questions
radiation victims Questions Questions
The Web Fairy
Wing TV
9/11 Activism
9/11 Blogger
<< Home
911 Truth.org
911 Truth LA.us
911 Truth LA.org
911 Truth Emergence
911 We Know
9-11 UK
NY 9/11 Truth

Summer of Truth
Proposition 911
Reopen 911
Deception Dollars
Justice for 9/11

Team 8 Plus
Flight 93 Hoax
WTC Demolition
9/11 Photo Analysis
WTC
collapse
Flight 77 FOIA site
Flight 93 Crash.com
Pentagon Research
9/11 Flash Movies

Buddy Buddy
Pentagon Strike
911 Questions

that question 9/11
Rigorous Intuition
Wing TV
Xymphora
Killtown's Blog
George Washington
Propaganda Matrix
Daniel Hopsicker
Cryptome
World Order News
Good Intro Books to

Griffin
Ray Griffin
Ian Henshall
Webster G. Tarpley
Thompson

Ruppert
Hopsicker

Arctic Beacon

with 9/11
Break for News
Tom Flocco

Buzzflash
The Raw Story
Think Progress
Common Dreams
Consortium News
Cursor
Guerrilla News
Online Journal
The Memory Hole
Press Action
News from Babylon
Unknown News
TV News Lies
Eschaton
Daily Kos
Talking Points Memo
Hullabaloo
Billmon
The Brad Blog
Jesus' General
The Rude Pundit
The Poor Man
Today in Iraq
Antiwar.com
Constant Pated
Clusterfuck Nation
Donkey Rising
Salon
Slate
My Other Blogs
Al-CIA-duh
Ghost Plane
Flight 93 Hoax


Peak Oil and

Oil and Gas
The Oil Drum
Land of Black Gold
Richard Heinberg
Grist

Conspiracy Theory!
World Trade Center Demolition: Was the First Atomic Bomb [in modern times] Exploded on an American Town by the American Govt?

Sunday, June 29, 2008 trade center buildings 1, 2
Was the First Atomic Bomb [in modern times] demolition.
Exploded on an American Town by the American
Govt?
About Me
Book Review: "The Last Wave From Port Chicago" by Peter Vogel Name: spooked
Vogel’s book is freely downloadable here. hijackings and crashes were clever hoaxes. The
http://www.portchicago.org/ WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7 towers were brought
Port Chicago was a WWII munitions port about 35 miles northwest of San use of small nuclear bombs in the demolition of
Francisco, traversed through various waterways. The massive explosion WTC1 and 2. All in all, 9/11 was a massive and
that occurred there, at 10:19 P.M. on July 17, 1944 has been the subject of cruel hoax foisted upon the world, done in order
debate ever since. Wikipedia has this summary of the superficial info: to spark the obscene "war on terror", to cover up
“The Port Chicago disaster was a deadly explosion that took place on July financial fraud and to further the ends of the
17, 1944 at the Port Chicago Naval Magazine in Port Chicago, California ... global elite. 9/11 was only the most egregious of
killing 320 sailors and civilians, and injuring more than 400 others. Most of several other recent false-flag terror operations.
the dead and injured were African American recruits, and the continuing
unsafe conditions even after the disaster resulted in a number of
servicemen refusing to work, known as the Port Chicago Mutiny, a month
later ... Two hundred and eight sailors were convicted in summary courts- More 9/11 Links (Note: I present a wide
martial, and received bad conduct discharges. The remaining 50 men, variety of 9/11 sites here for the
known today as The Port Chicago 50, were found guilty of mutiny in a purposes of diversity. I leave it up to
subsequent court martial, and were sentenced to dishonorable discharges you to judge their content.)
and prison sentences of 8 and 15 years of hard labor... Thurgood Marshall
sued the Navy on behalf of the 50 sailors. Although he was unable to get
General 9/11 Sites
the convictions overturned, Marshall succeeded in winning clemency for the
9/11 Blimp
50 sailors, but not until after the war in 1946.”
9/11 Busters
9/11 CGI Watch
In The Last Wave From Port Chicago, author Peter Vogel, details his over 9/11 Closeup (Gerard Holmgren)
20-year quest to prove that the Port Chicago explosion was a nuclear one. 9/11 Complicity
The book attempts to show that Port Chicago was the one and only “proof 9/11 Cover-Up
firing/test” of the Mark II [Uranium Hydride Autocatalytic Lateral Implosion] 9/11 Dossier (UK)
atomic bomb. Vogel starts off his tale with his own history of being a rebel
9/11 Encyclopedia
and being anti-establishment, and even being arrested at a protest rally for
assaulting a policeman. He then became a reporter at the “San Francisco 9/11 Foreknowledge
Chronicle”, and subsequently an editor for “Electronics” magazine. At the 9/11 Hoax
latter, he wrote, or edited, at least one piece on electronic component 9/11 Oddities
reliability in ICBMs shot into the Van Allen Radiation belts! Vogel ends up in
9/11 Overview
1980 in New Mexico, appointed by Governor King to be Secretary of the
Board of Directors of NMERDI--the New Mexico Energy Research and 9/11 Plot
Development Institute. He writes that Gov. King liked him so much, that he 9/11 Proof
appointed him to be an honorary Colonel in the NM National Guard. 9/11 Research (Jim Hoffman)
9/11 Resources
This is how Vogel ended up in New Mexico where, for 25 cents, in 1980, at 9/11 Review.org
a Santa Fe Church rummage sale, he purchased a box of donated tools 9/11 Review.com
http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2008/06/was-first-atomic-bomb-in-modern-times.html[07.11.2010 14:55:42]
that had in its bottom, a photocopy of a remarkable document. The 9/11 Stealth
document was titled “History of 10,000 ton gadget.” [Gadget was code for 9/11 Strike
the fission bomb.] It included information on “fireball,” “detonation,’ and 9/11 True Story
“radiation.” Vogel traced the document to Paul Masters, who worked at Los 9/11 "U"
Alamos, during the Manhattan Project. Masters was involved with 9/11 Verses
photography and copying. Masters had apparently copied this secret Awoken Research Group
document, and taken it home with him, in his “shirt pocket.” The penalty for Thompson)
doing this was quite severe, and gives pause. Curious also, is the fact that Finnish 9/11 Site
Masters’ wife, Charlie, was in “counterespionage,” and “connected” to the Finnish 9/11 Site in English
Secret Service! Vogel reads the document and begins researching the Port Gallerize
Chicago explosion, and related Los Alamos matters. German Engineers 9/11 site
One of the first people he interviewed, at Los Alamos, was Dr. Edward Icelandic 9/11 site
Teller. Vogel had actually taken a course from Teller in California years Jane Doe's 9/11 site
earlier. Teller, of course, is notorious as the right-wing “father of the H- Juscogen's 9/11 site
Bomb.” Except that that claim is false. (See the book, “Dark Sun: The Killtown
Making of the Hydrogen Bomb” by Richard Rhodes, read here.) Teller was
also involved in the so-called SDI or “Star Wars” development of shooting
down missiles, high above the Earth. Vogel arranges to meet Teller at Los
Let's Roll 9/11
Alamos--and lies and says the interview will be about the energy crisis-- Morgan Reynolds WTC Demolition
and photographs him, after he surprised Teller with the “History of 10,000 Essay
ton gadget” document. This photo shows Teller looking at the Morgan Reynolds 9/11 Commission
Essay
document. Teller stops and tells Vogel, “I believe you have a classified
document. You should take it immediately to the Classification Office. I will
Nerdcities 9/11
deny I have ever seen this document. I will deny I have ever discussed Operation 9/11
Port Chicago with you.” The two go off to that office with the document, but Planet Quo 9/11
Vogel keeps a copy, of the classified document. Rick Siegel (9/11 Eyewitness)
RINF 9/11 Archive
Shortly after this, as Vogel begins his in-depth research into the possible, Terrorize (Danish 911 site)
deliberate nuking of Port Chicago, by the American gov’t, an important Los The Mysteries of 9/11
Alamos report on Port Chicago gets re-classified, after it had been de- THE TRUTH ABOUT SEPT 11 (Compiled
by Gerard Holmgren)
classified. Nonetheless, there is a massive store of documents on Port
Shunned
Chicago at Los Alamos. Officially Port Chicago could not be a nuclear
Physics 911
explosion, in part, because there was not enough Uranium-235 [U-235]
Physics 9/11.co.nr
available for this in July, 1944. Vogel attempts to show that this is incorrect, Plague Puppy's Cafe
and that every book saying this is wrong. He takes particular aim at Plague Puppy: Alternate Site
Richard Rhodes’ Pulitzer Prize winning book, “The Making of the Atomic Question 911
Bomb.” (Read here.) Vogel shows numerous errors of commission and Truth 911
omission, and says the book must have won its awards for its mass, not its Brad's 911 site
veracity. Vogel writes that he is told, by physicists, to help prove his case, Club Ivy's 911 site
he should ascertain the amount of U-235 that was available at the time of Brad's old 9/11 site
the Port Chicago blast. This too remains classified, even though this is now Flamesong 9/11 Essay and Links
six decades later. The book thus has numerous chapters and appendices Serendipity (various essays on 9/11)
related to the amount of U-235 the Govt’s labs had produced at different Stop the Lie 9/11
times. Curiously again, Vogel gets two Los Alamos Manhattan Project The Strange Images of 9/11/2001
scientists to tell him the answers to this question. They tell him that there Total 9/11 Info
was enough U-235 in July, 1944 for the Port Chicago blast--even though
Questions Questions
this information is classified, and has serious penalties for Manhattan
The Web Fairy
project scientists to reveal to anyone. (Assuming those scientists’
Wing TV
responses were truthful.)
Let me now summarize the findings of this book, and articles by Vogel and 9/11 Activism
others that try to prove that the Port Chicago explosion was a nuclear one, 9/11 Blogger
as opposed to an explosion of the munitions at the pier, or on board the 9/11 Citizens' Watch
two ships (the SS E.A. Bryan and the SS Quinault Victory,) in the water 9/11 Skeptics Unite!
near the pier at Port Chicago. The explosion was massive--the pier was 911 Truth.org
leveled and much of the nearby town was also--and had a large white 911 Truth LA.us
fireball visible for several hundred miles. People for over 20 miles reported 911 Truth LA.org
911 Truth Emergence
seeing a bright white light as bright as several Suns. Reports state that the
911 We Know
column of flame rose to approx. 10,000 feet before the night sky prevented
observation of any further rising. The flame from the Trinity test, a year
later, also rose to that altitude, with its subsequent mushroom cloud rising 9-11 UK
to nearly twice that height. The resultant cloud at Port Chicago was 9/11 Family Steering Committee
described as being a “mushroom cloud”--the first time that term was used NY 9/11 Truth
in public discourse in the English language. The document Vogel found

which was written after Port Chicago, but before Trinity, correctly predicted Scholars for 9/11 Truth
the 18,000-foot altitude of the Trinity mushroom cloud “in typical Port Community Currency 9/11
Chicago fashion.” Vogel shows these things did not occur in other huge Summer of Truth
munition ship explosions, that he details in the book. All seismograms were Proposition 911
immediately seized, and not allowed to be published for several years. Reopen 911
Were they re-done, as I have asserted the WTC seismic recordings were? Deception Dollars
Eyewitnesses said some of the many missiles that flew to great distances Justice for 9/11
were of various colors indicating they were in a molten state due to what
we lately call “extraordinarily high temperatures.” The official report itself 9/11 Specialty Sites
says many missiles were molten. The Navy was even there across the pier Team 8 Plus
making a film of the explosion. This was revealed some years later when Flight 93 Hoax
they began showing a nuclear explosion that some recognized as being of WTC Demolition
Port Chicago. The military then said this was not an actual film, but was The Ultimate Hijacker Compilation
“special effects” [sound familiar?] created much later. Others examined the 9/11 Photo Analysis
film itself, and proved that this was false, as the film was made of nitrate Evidence of Explosives on 9/11
that was used in 1944, but was no longer used because of its own Demolition, the Truth of 9/11 and the
WTC
flammable nature.
collapse
Of particular importance is the following: 1. Reports from Los Alamos, and WTC Streaking Object, WTC7 theories
other places, about subsequent fission bomb detonations contain the Flight 77 FOIA site
phrase, “in Port Chicago fashion,” when referring to the rising mushroom Flight 93 Crash.com
cloud or fireball. Even when the British regime exploded its first atomic Pentagon Research
bomb, in 1952, off the coast of Australia, their report stated, the bomb was Brad's Pentagon Analysis
placed in a forward hold of the HMS Plym and detonated "Port Chicago Where Is Osama (The Osama Clock)
style." 2. Crucially, before the Port Chicago explosion, there are Los
Alamos reports (at the highest levels--Dr. Conant and General Grove) on 9/11 Flash Movies
the need for a test/proof firing of the Mark II nuclear device--before further 9/11 chronology (network footage)
development or use of this type of A-bomb. But just after the Port Chicago Buddy Buddy
explosion, Los Alamos reports (between the same top people) state that Pentagon Strike
this is no longer necessary, and that they can go on to other things. 3. Los 911 Questions
Alamos scientists were immediately sent to Port Chicago, and the Navy’s
three man Court of Inquiry on the matter, which began a few days later,
included the brother-in-law (Capt. J.S. Crenshaw) of one of the top Los Reasonably reliable "Conspiracy Sites"
Alamos people, Captain Parsons. Parsons would fly in the Enola Gay to that question 9/11
arm the Bomb before its dropping on Hiroshima. 4. At the time of the Port Rigorous Intuition
Wing TV
Chicago blast, Los Alamos physicists thought the bomb to be used on
Xymphora
Japan would be too heavy for airborne use, and therefore had to be taken
Killtown's Blog
in by ship. 5. There was a massive 800-foot diameter crater created under
the S.S. Bryan. Center for an Informed America
George Washington
Out of 320 dead, only 81 bodies were recovered. Out of these 81, only 30 Centre for Research on Globalization
bodies could be identified. However, we cannot assume any vaporization of Prison Planet (Alex Jones)
people, as these figures could possibly result from conventional explosions Daily Two Minutes of Hate
in ships. The long lasting effects of the Port Chicago blast are also telling. The Emperor's New Clothes
In 1968, the federal govt bought up all the buildings in Port Chicago, and Public Action (Carol Valentine)
demolished them, and later erected a monument. There has been a high Propaganda Matrix
cancer incidence in Contra Costa County, CA for the last several decades. Daniel Hopsicker
Cryptome
Curiously, Vogel did not suffer a strange car accident, nor surprise heart Crimes and Corruptions of the New
World Order News
attack, nor rapid cancer, nor was he brutally assaulted nor had his home Covert 2 Overt Analysis
contaminated with a very toxic form of mercury, as was done to me, for just
once speaking out on how SS agent Greer shot both Connally and
Kennedy. Vogel meets with many Los Alamos scientists and tells each one Good Intro Books to
that he is researching Port Chicago, and that he is trying to prove that the Alternative 9/11 Truth
U.S. Govt deliberately nuked this American pier and town, and suffers no "The New Pearl Harbor, Disturbing
harmful consequences for this. There is much else in the book that gives Questions About the Bush
me pause. Much else seems to be establishment dogma. There is the Griffin
omission of what the Ottawa agreement really was about (British control of "The 9/11 Commission Report:
American nukes), standard nonsense about Osama bin Laden is thrown in, Omissions And Distortions" by David
Ray Griffin
immense praise for one of the members of NMERDI, Dean McGee, 9/11 Revealed by Rowland Morgan and
Chairman of Kerr McGee. I have written of the jury verdict against Kerr Ian Henshall
McGee in the Plutonium poisoning and car ramming murder of Karen "9/11 Synthetic Terror, Made in USA" by
Webster G. Tarpley
Silkwood. There is an establishment view on many things in the book, even
saying there was a need to nuke an American town, and American sailors, Thompson
to “save 100,000 American lives” in the invasion of Japan. When the truth "Crossing the Rubicon" by Michael C.
Ruppert
is that Japan had tried to surrender for months prior to Hiroshima. Some of
the reports on Port Chicago at Los Alamos, and other Los Alamos reports, Hopsicker
show one parameter the Manhattan Project was always concerned with,
was destruction of “dwelling houses.” So the mass murder of innocent
civilians was always the goal. "Conspiracy Sites" that deal with 9/11
Recently I have seen what is likely an intel Hangout regarding Port What Really Happened
Chicago. Now it is claimed, by some, that Port Chicago was indeed a From the Wilderness (Mike Ruppert)
Arctic Beacon
nuclear explosion, but it was an accident! All sorts of specious arguments
are used. But the history of American nuclear bombs is that, from the
outset, various fail-safe mechanisms were employed that made it virtually Unreliable "Conspiracy Sites" that deal
impossible for an accidental explosion to occur. If the SS E.A. Bryan held with 9/11
an atomic bomb in its hull, it would not have been armed until it was ready Break for News
to be “proof/test fired” and also studied and filmed at its “anointed place.” Tom Flocco
A related matter is that I have read another book on some of these matters
that has a very different take on them. This book is "Critical Mass: How Democratic/Progressive News Sites,
Nazi Germany Surrendered Enriched Uranium for The United States' Blogs and Miscellaneous Links
Atomic Bomb" by Carter Plymton Hydrick. It may not be readily available, Buzzflash
The Raw Story
but is highly recommended here. It demonstrates that both the fissile
material, and even the advanced detonator mechanism used on Hiroshima
were of German origin, and taken from the submarine that officially was
Think Progress
intercepted on its way to Japan, which had set sail near the end of Hitler’s Citizens for a Legitimate Government
reign. I thought the book did a good job of demonstrating its hypotheses. Common Dreams
Now the regime’s intel assets have gone crazy both in regards to Hydrick’s Consortium News
book and Vogel’s. (See the use of foul ridicule that would be recognized, Center for Cooperative Research
even here, as coming from intel entities.) But here you can read how Cursor
some of the strongest critics of “Critical Mass” changed Guerrilla News
their minds when presented with the evidence. I have a Online Journal
different take than Hydrick on this, going to my Ultimate Truths here: The Memory Hole
http://anonymous-physicist.blogspot.com. Information Clearing House
Press Action
If the Atomic Bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki had German News from Babylon
fissile material and advanced detonators, this wasn’t by accident that this Unknown News
TV News Lies
came into the hands of the Manhattan Project people. Rather the PTB
intended this destination for these materials, and not Japan. Similarly, the
Eschaton
Uranium for the Port Chicago blast may have been delivered from
Daily Kos
Germany, or elsewhere in 1944, as well. This could be the reason that the Talking Points Memo
American Govt won’t release its 1943-45 Uranium production amounts still, Hullabaloo
over 60 years later! And the PTB do not want the People to know how they Billmon
controlled WWII for that purpose--creating nuclear bombs for use on The Brad Blog
Humanity; and the different “sides” of that war, and all wars, have been a Jesus' General
ruse. “Critical Mass” also reveals some strangeness regarding the physicist The Rude Pundit
given credit for the advanced detonators that also had been a great The Poor Man
stumbling block to implosion fission devices. This was Luis Alvarez, PhD. Juan Cole (Informed Comment)
Decades later, this Alvarez (who would also receive a Nobel Prize) would Today in Iraq
write some impossible Physics that President Kennedy’s body could be Antiwar.com
slammed backward against the incoming momentum of a bullet fired from Iraq Coalition Casualties
behind him. Alvarez wrote this claptrap, and got it published in a Physics Constant Pated
Clusterfuck Nation
Journal--shades of Bazant and Seffen--after the Zapruder film was first
Donkey Rising
publicly shown in 1975. It’s a violation of the fundamental Law of
Salon
Conservation of Momentum. Before this, the regime/media just lied and
Slate
said Kennedy’s body went forward in the limo. So Hydrick’s book and
Vogel’s book are similar, but different. Unlike Hydrick’s book, Vogel’s
ignores the issue of the detonation difficulties that also held up testing and My Other Blogs
use of fission bombs, and asserts that there was enough fissile material Humint Events Online
(U-235) by July 1944, let alone August 1945. I recommend people read THE WORST PRESIDENT EVER!!!!
both, and make up their own minds. Bush Administration War Criminals
Vogel shows that the Hiroshima nuke used only 1.14% of its contained Al-CIA-duh
fissile material--the rest of the U235 did not undergo fission--due to the Ghost Plane
Flight 93 Hoax
geometry and Physics of the implosion/explosion. Thus its efficiency is
about 1%. The Port Chicago type A-Bomb had even less efficiency--about
0.5%. More recently, 6% efficiency for updated nuclear bombs is cited.
This will be important in another (upcoming) article.
My conclusion is that there is much circumstantial evidence that the Port

Chicago explosion was a nuclear fission explosion that was deliberately
perpetrated by the U.S. regime. One could argue that circumstantial
evidence is not proof, but trials have resulted in murder convictions based
solely on circumstantial evidence. But one could say that there is no
absolute proof, unless that film is of the Port Chicago nuking. Or unless
some Los Alamos scientists who know the truth, would come forward. Of
course, if they did, they could face charges of releasing secret information
on the one hand. And on the other hand, they could (if the People ever got
control of the regime again) face charges of Mass Murder, Treason,
Conspiracy, maybe even genocide of a race, as the use of Afro-Americans,
and removing the white Coast Guard detail that night is also telling. So we
are not likely to get a confession from the perps.
Peter Vogel’s "The Last Wave From Port Chicago" presents much evidence
that the July 17, 1944 Port Chicago explosion was a deliberate nuking of
our own citizens, and sailors, and an American town and pier, by our own
government. It should be read by all. It also fits in with the evidence that
the WTC destruction on 9/11/01, was the deliberate nuking of America’s
largest city by its own regime, and that the China Syndrome resulted, as
detailed here http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com and here wtc-
chinasyndrome.blogspot.com.
But going beyond this level, I consider it a strong possibility that
the PTB wanted the deliberate nuking of Port Chicago to get Flight 93 and New Baltimore piece
out! While they deny it officially for the masses, they want Flight 93 article and picture gallery
others to know. There is too much “coincidence” here. Vogel’s early
anti-establishment, and so much later recitation of establishment dogma,
the finding of the document, the strangeness of its owner and his “secret Miscellaneous Items of Interest
service, counterespionage” wife. The lack of prevention/retribution rained CNN infiltrated by US Army Psy-ops
down on Vogel. The two scientists who told him there was sufficient US National Debt Clock
Uranium--IF that is true. We have both too many coincidences, and also The American Taliban
many people who could have, and maybe still could, face severe penalties
for their parts in this. Would anyone but a spy--or someone starting this Peak Oil and
“revelation” want to photocopy a top-secret document, and then take it Sustainability/Environmental Sites
home, and face severe penalties? The document would be available from The Association for the Study of Peak
then on, at such time as the PTB would want to promulgate it. Likewise for Oil and Gas
the scientists who faced severe penalties for revealing Uranium-235 The Oil Drum
production amounts. They were not arrested or harmed. But all these Land of Black Gold
“coincidences” in Vogel’s tale may be genuine. Flying Talking Donkey
Richard Heinberg
Finally, in light of the distinctions of the two above books in regards to
Grist
available amounts of fissile material and advanced detonators, I can not
know for sure which is right. But this is not the main issue. Regardless of
whether the Uranium-235, or the detonators, in a nuclear bomb at Port The Official 9/11 Story IS a
Chicago came from an American lab, or a German lab, or elsewhere, the Conspiracy Theory!
evidence itself reveals that it is very probable that the
American and British regimes ordered the nuking of Port people conspiring to commit a crime. The official
Chicago, in furtherance of its plans for more massive 9/11 narrative, as codified by the 9/11
nukings on other civilians in Japan, and so on. likely explanation for the events of 9/11/01. The
Did the perps, still at Los Alamos, and

Lawrence Livermore observe the nuking I have no fondness for any religion, as I think it
of the WTC on 9/11, and say that the Islamic terrorists do exist and I detest them as
rising smoke, photographed going up patsies in 9/11, as part of a highly organized
into space, was in ... “Port Chicago

fashion”?
IMPORTANT UPDATE:
The Pt Chicago date is July 17, 1944.
That’s 7/17/1944.
Adding up the digits: 7, 1, 7, 1, 9, 4, 4 adds up to 33!

All things nuclear! Especially the first one in modern times!
<< Home
World Trade Center Demolition: Could 9/11 Have Been Done With FAE/Thermobaric Explosives?

Tuesday, October 16, 2007 trade center buildings 1, 2
Could 9/11 Have Been Done With FAE/Thermobaric demolition.
Explosives?
By The Anonymous Physicist About Me

Name: spooked
Major breakthroughs on the nuking of the WTC will be coming soon. For
now, let us examine the theory that the WTC was demolished solely, or The official 9/11 story is a lie. The 9/11 plane
primarily, via thermobaric (Fuel/Air) explosives. Thermobaric or Fuel Air hijackings and crashes were clever hoaxes. The
Explosives (FAE) produce great blast and overpressure. Their relatively WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7 towers were brought
high temperature (compared to other conventional explosives), and over- down by demolition, and there is evidence for the
pressure can cause great damage to structure, and to humans. And I have use of small nuclear bombs in the demolition of
written (coming soon), they were possibly used in the initial explosions WTC1 and 2. All in all, 9/11 was a massive and
(bogus “plane hits.”) But let us address whether thermobarics could have cruel hoax foisted upon the world, done in order
caused the final WTC demolition we saw, and the China Syndrome to spark the obscene "war on terror", to cover up
aftermath we know came to be. financial fraud and to further the ends of the
We know from the towers’ missing mass (debris, rubble), and the dust
testing that much steel structure was vaporized. We also have the quote, View my complete profile
after examination, from fire engineering professor, Dr. Barnett, about
his observing steel beams that he said showed evidence of More 9/11 Links (Note: I present a wide
vaporized steel from “extraordinarily high temperatures”, that variety of 9/11 sites here for the
led to a laughable “refutation” from a disinfo physicist (scroll purposes of diversity. I leave it up to
down to comments). How anyone could believe anything from either you to judge their content.)
of the two disinfo agents/physicists is beyond me.
General 9/11 Sites

Now the best thermobarics reach a temperature of about 2500 9/11 Blimp
to 3000 degrees Celsius. Steel boils (vaporizes) at about 3000 9/11 Busters
degrees Celsius. I understand that most of the steel structure in the 9/11 CGI Watch
towers was treated with asbestos and other types of fireproofing, which
9/11 Complicity
would give it an effective higher vaporization temperature, thus likely
9/11 Cover-Up
beyond the range of even the best thermobaric/FAE explosives. We also
9/11 Dossier (UK)
have the issue of time, for an explosive that barely, maybe reaches the
boiling point of steel, the explosive would not provide enough time to yield 9/11 Encyclopedia
what Dr. Barnett saw. Does your water boil instantly, even though 9/11 Foreknowledge
your burner has a temperature somewhat beyond water’s boiling point? No, 9/11 Hoax
it takes time-- but it would vaporize instantly if it were nuked! The
9/11 Oddities
“extraordinarily high temperatures” of a nuke, or neutron bombardment,
would vaporize (boil) steel instantly. But even if we give thermobarics the 9/11 Overview
benefit of the doubt; let’s say you wanted to have the rapid, mostly
9/11 Plot
symmetric, virtual free-fall (some say faster than free fall, as this is not in a
9/11 Proof
vacuum), 10-12 second complete destruction of the towers, would you
employ an explosive that might possibly, barely vaporize some steel 9/11 Resources
structure; or would you need and use something that instantly, 9/11 Review.org
overwhelmingly vaporized it— via multi-million degree temperature, and 9/11 Review.com
neutron bombardment?
http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2007/10/could-911-have-been-done-with.html[07.11.2010 14:56:18]
9/11 Stealth
9/11 Strike
9/11 True Story
For completeness now, thermobarics cause great damage to structure and 9/11 "U"
to human beings. “The blast wave destroys UNREINFORCED 9/11 Verses
(get it?) buildings” and the office of the Australian Minister Awoken Research Group
of Defence states “Internal organs that contain air (sinuses, Complete 9/11 Timeline (Paul
Thompson)
ears, lungs and intestines) are particularly vulnerable to Finnish 9/11 Site
[thermobaric] blast. The whole body may also be thrown by blast Finnish 9/11 Site in English
wind, which can result in fractures. Besides the obvious blast injuries, Gallerize
recent research has shown that there are neurological, biochemical and German Engineers 9/11 site
blood chemistry changes caused by blast effects.” But at least one thing is Hybrideb's 9/11 site
clearly missing… VAPORIZATION. As Spooked has posted here after Icelandic 9/11 site
reading Robert Shaler's book on attempted DNA matching of 9/11 victims, Jane Doe's 9/11 site
"Who They Were", some 1157 tower workers were missing completely and Juscogen's 9/11 site
probably vaporized. Instant vaporization of people and structures, I have Killtown
written, is well known from Hiroshima and Nagasaki to occur at, or near, Oil and Empire 9/11 (Mark Robinowitz)
the hypocenter of a nuke. And I already cited the steel vaporization which is Portland Indy Media 9/11
not attainable, or not significantly so, with thermobarics, and less likely with 119 Questions about 9/11
Let's Roll 9/11
asbestos-treated steel. And you don’t get the China Syndrome aftermath of
six month long high temperatures and molten steel— that I have heavily Essay
documented with numerous articles here, and ensuing cancer deaths Morgan Reynolds 9/11 Commission
including thyroid, leukemia and lymph cancers— known radiation-induced Essay
cancers. Nor would thermobarics provide the responders’ later teeth falling Missile Gate (analysis of 1st hit)
Nerdcities 9/11
out, or demolition-time burned or hanging skin WITHOUT FIRE, that I have
Operation 9/11
repeatedly highlighted in my previous articles. Nor did we see the fireballs
Planet Quo 9/11
during “collapse” (a la the “plane hits”), that we would have, if thermobarics
were employed in any appreciable sense during final demolition. All these RINF 9/11 Archive
missing, but necessary, actual WTC destruction, and aftermath, Terrorize (Danish 911 site)
components prove that the main WTC demolition cause was NOT the The Mysteries of 9/11
hangouts of Nuke-Like, or Nuke-Light, thermobarics, or “DEW”. THE TRUTH ABOUT SEPT 11 (Compiled
by Gerard Holmgren)
Shunned
In the final analysis, thermobaric explosives may well have been used for Physics 911
Physics 9/11.co.nr
the “plane hit" explosions, and possibly also in a subsidiary capacity
Plague Puppy's Cafe
BEFORE the final destruction-- to allow for the use of what I have called
“underpowered” nuke(s). Both the Finnish military expert and myself
Question 911
(months ago, now at www.wtcdemolition.blogspot.com) have basically Truth 911
written that keeping the nuking “under wraps” was much desired. Outer Brad's 911 site
steel support structure would be cut or exploded with conventional Club Ivy's 911 site
explosives or cutting charges. I have written that the “innards” of the towers Brad's old 9/11 site
were vaporized by nukes, allowing the overpressure throughout to help Flamesong 9/11 Essay and Links
"peel away" the outer structure. The Finnish expert details how this last part Serendipity (various essays on 9/11)
was likely assisted with conventional explosives, such as thermate or C4. Stop the Lie 9/11
So we have seen that thermobarics cannot account for the actual WTC Total 9/11 Info
destruction and aftermath. What we witnessed on 9/11/01 at the WTC was Unanswered Questions
the dreaded nuking of an American city by its most horrific enemy— its own Questions Questions
federal government. More shocking nuclear proof is coming soon. The Web Fairy
Wing TV
9/11 Activism
9/11 Blogger
<< Home
911 Truth.org
911 Truth LA.us
911 Truth LA.org
911 Truth Emergence
911 We Know
9-11 UK
NY 9/11 Truth

Summer of Truth
Proposition 911
Reopen 911
Deception Dollars
Justice for 9/11

Team 8 Plus
Flight 93 Hoax
WTC Demolition
9/11 Photo Analysis
WTC
collapse
Flight 77 FOIA site
Flight 93 Crash.com
Pentagon Research
9/11 Flash Movies

Buddy Buddy
Pentagon Strike
911 Questions

that question 9/11
Rigorous Intuition
Wing TV
Xymphora
Killtown's Blog
George Washington
Propaganda Matrix
Daniel Hopsicker
Cryptome
World Order News
Good Intro Books to

Griffin
Ray Griffin
Ian Henshall
Webster G. Tarpley
Thompson

Ruppert
Hopsicker

Arctic Beacon

with 9/11
Break for News
Tom Flocco

Buzzflash
The Raw Story
Think Progress
Common Dreams
Consortium News
Cursor
Guerrilla News
Online Journal
The Memory Hole
Press Action
News from Babylon
Unknown News
TV News Lies
Eschaton
Daily Kos
Talking Points Memo
Hullabaloo
Billmon
The Brad Blog
Jesus' General
The Rude Pundit
The Poor Man
Today in Iraq
Antiwar.com
Constant Pated
Clusterfuck Nation
Donkey Rising
Salon
Slate
My Other Blogs
Al-CIA-duh
Ghost Plane
Flight 93 Hoax


Peak Oil and

Oil and Gas
The Oil Drum
Land of Black Gold
Richard Heinberg
Grist

Conspiracy Theory!
World Trade Center Demolition: Breakthroughs Toward Attaining A Complete Understanding of the Nuking of the WTC on 9/11-- The Likelihood ...

Monday, November 12, 2007 trade center buildings 1, 2
Breakthroughs Toward Attaining A Complete demolition.
Understanding of the Nuking of the WTC on 9/11--
The Likelihood of Sabotaged, Fizzled Nukes
About Me
This article will include breakthroughs that may provide a complete
understanding of all the anomalous matters in the nuclear destruction of The official 9/11 story is a lie. The 9/11 plane
the WTC. My previous articles on the WTC nuclear destruction of the WTC, hijackings and crashes were clever hoaxes. The
and its aftermath are here and here. There is much evidence that the WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7 towers were brought
sub-basement of WTC 1 was hit with a nuclear bomb around the time of down by demolition, and there is evidence for the
the first “plane hit. The accounts (I have previously given) of surviving burn use of small nuclear bombs in the demolition of
victim Felipe David and stationary engineer Mike Pecoraro, strongly WTC1 and 2. All in all, 9/11 was a massive and
indicate that this sub-basement, massive blast was nuclear. My article cruel hoax foisted upon the world, done in order
on Felipe David made clear that David’s hanging and burnt skin was to spark the obscene "war on terror", to cover up
from the radiation from a nuke. Pecoraro’s account of a vaporized 50 financial fraud and to further the ends of the
ton hydraulic press, missing parking garage, and the 300 pound steel and global elite. 9/11 was only the most egregious of
concrete door shriveled up “like aluminum foil” also were from this nuke. several other recent false-flag terror operations.
We also had phone outage from an EMP (Electromagnetic Pulse) that is
part of a nuclear bomb’s effects, at this time and long before the tower’s
destruction, as you can read here. Perhaps the early-on EMP is why there
were so many military helicopters and planes at the towers— possibly even More 9/11 Links (Note: I present a wide
initiating conventional and/or nuclear explosions, including the final nuclear variety of 9/11 sites here for the
destruction, via direct line-of-sight lasers into the towers, because radio purposes of diversity. I leave it up to
communications either failed or could not be counted upon, after the first you to judge their content.)
nuke (and EMP).
General 9/11 Sites

9/11 Blimp
Now regarding the nuking of the WTC, let me re-introduce the crucial
9/11 Busters
concept of “redundancy.” When the PTB decide to do something, and that
9/11 CGI Watch
it must not fail, various forms of redundancy are utilized. If a nuke is to go
off in the basement, and say on several upper floors, they would likely have 9/11 Complicity
emplaced more than one at each of those levels. Why? Because nukes 9/11 Cover-Up
have been known to fail to detonate, or fail to detonate with 9/11 Dossier (UK)
their maximum potential. To have a nuclear bomb go off with its
9/11 Encyclopedia
maximum potential devastation achieved is very complicated and
intertwined. Maximizing the nuclear chain reaction— while necessarily 9/11 Foreknowledge
minimizing the time interval of the chain reaction, after having a successful, 9/11 Hoax
complicated, conventional explosion, involves many things being done near 9/11 Oddities
perfectly— including having properly manufactured/enhanced substances,
9/11 Overview
and triggering mechanisms. This can never be 100% guaranteed. (I am
assuming that the trigger is conventional explosives, as opposed to 9/11 Plot
possible newer modalities including laser or sound waves.) We also have 9/11 Proof
Bill Deagle relating how an ATF agent from the OKC bombing 9/11 Research (Jim Hoffman)
told him he removed unused extra— i.e. redundant-- micro- 9/11 Resources
nukes from the Murrah building. If a nuke at a level is crucial for the 9/11 Review.org
demolition scenario (including its secondary, fall-back scenarios), there 9/11 Review.com
http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2007/11/breakthroughs-toward-attaining-complete.html[07.11.2010 14:57:14]
likely was more than one there, in case the first “fizzled.” 9/11 Stealth
9/11 Strike
Because with a fizzled, crucial nuke, the failed remains would provide a 9/11 True Story
giveaway that the regime itself just tried to nuke the WTC. Clearly the plan 9/11 "U"
called for the complete destruction of the WTC, followed by evidence 9/11 Verses
removal. Now, I assert that great redundancy, and the alternative (bottom Awoken Research Group
up) tower destruction mechanism, and “leaning” (recall my John Miller Thompson)
piece) scenarios, were partially employed, or prepared, because this was Finnish 9/11 Site
the first time a top-bottom set of nukes going off vertically, and very Finnish 9/11 Site in English
complexly, and timed with conventional explosives was done. Indeed the Gallerize
bogus “leaning” was the fall back scenario if the planned nuking scenario German Engineers 9/11 site
proved untenable. And things did not go perfectly at all. There would be Hybrideb's 9/11 site
numerous “fizzled” nukes! Icelandic 9/11 site
While we can never know with certainty which type(s) of nukes were Juscogen's 9/11 site
employed, they would likely have used ones that were likely the most Killtown
dependable. Now the evidence indicates that both fission and fusion
occurred at the WTC. The govt’s publicly released studies found Uranium,
and Tritium (fusion source); while Plutonium was never tested for (or such
Let's Roll 9/11
data was not released.) Relatively massive amounts of Strontium Morgan Reynolds WTC Demolition
and Barium were found in the dust in at least one WTC area, Essay
conclusive to William Tahil that a significant amount of fission Morgan Reynolds 9/11 Commission
Essay
occurred. So the presence of both tritium and fission by-products
(Strontium and Barium are by-products of the fission of Uranium or
Nerdcities 9/11
Plutonium) indicate that fission and fusion took place. Tritium boosting Operation 9/11
(fusion) has been incorporated into fission bombs. These nukes may have Planet Quo 9/11
been thought to be the most dependable. “Fusion boosted fission Rick Siegel (9/11 Eyewitness)
bombs can also be made immune to radiation from nearby RINF 9/11 Archive
nuclear explosions which can cause other designs to Terrorize (Danish 911 site)
predetonate, blowing themselves apart without achieving a The Mysteries of 9/11
high yield. The combination of reduced weight in relation to THE TRUTH ABOUT SEPT 11 (Compiled
by Gerard Holmgren)
yield and immunity to radiation means that most modern
Shunned
nuclear weapons are fusion boosted.” But Wikipedia is CIA-
Physics 911
connected. And note the conflict between the alleged “immune to radiation”
Physics 9/11.co.nr
claim and the information, I will reveal shortly, that neutrinos can, in effect, Plague Puppy's Cafe
“evaporate” sufficient nuclear material to prevent a full chain reaction. Plague Puppy: Alternate Site
Question 911
Truth 911
So let us assume this type of nuke was used, and that several of them Brad's 911 site
“fizzled.” First I need to clarify the difference in “fizzling” that I will delve into Club Ivy's 911 site
now, and the fizzled nukes I wrote of in my first articles. The core idea is Brad's old 9/11 site
the same— nuclear bomb fragments gave rise to the "China Syndrome". Flamesong 9/11 Essay and Links
But earlier I wrote of exploded nukes that impacted unexploded nukes. The Serendipity (various essays on 9/11)
latter then giving rise to these fragments, as is, or partially detonating Stop the Lie 9/11
thereafter. But now I will highlight crucial, new evidence that indicates The Strange Images of 9/11/2001
numerous nukes “fizzled” on their own, through likely sabotage, and not Total 9/11 Info
from the effects of other nukes. When these nukes that would “fizzle” were
Questions Questions
triggered, there are several possibilities. If their conventional triggering
The Web Fairy
explosives failed, there would be nothing. If these powerful, conventional
Wing TV
explosives went off (and the evidence herein indicates they did), there
would be blast from this; and likely some subsequent, partial nuclear
criticality would have been attained with some, or all, of these fizzled 9/11 Activism
nukes. But the blast, and neutron, and other, radiation released was a 9/11 Blogger
fraction of what was supposed to happen— and insufficient to bring down a 9/11 Citizens' Watch
building such as WTC7. The result was a (much) smaller nuke going off, 9/11 Skeptics Unite!
and the beginning of the China Syndrome of nuclear reacting fragments 911 Truth.org
exploded about— but perhaps mostly in the basements, if that’s where the 911 Truth LA.us
first nukes went off, as is probable. These fragments would be the HEAT 911 Truth LA.org
911 Truth Emergence
SOURCE that would give rise to the molten steel at the bottoms of the
911 We Know
three WTC skyscrapers in the coming months. The molten steel’s heat
source was the remnants from fizzled (likely sabotaged) nukes. These sub-
basement nuke fragments were unable to be completely removed, 9-11 UK
according to the evidence and logic I have presented, for six months, or so. 9/11 Family Steering Committee
Now if a “fizzled” nuke went off high up, in one of the twin towers, it would NY 9/11 Truth
likely disperse these fragments about the WTC (with much finer “bits”

dispersed much farther out), and give rise to more widespread, but lower Scholars for 9/11 Truth
level of heat that was measured. Community Currency 9/11
Summer of Truth
Proposition 911
How many fizzled nukes were there? I can only surmise. At least two for Reopen 911
WTC7 (the first, and at least one redundant one), and one or more per Deception Dollars
tower. Remember that the three skyscrapers had molten steel underneath Justice for 9/11
them for months. That would be a minimum of four fizzled nukes. If the
Murrah/OKC Deagle story is true (ATF agents removed several, 9/11 Specialty Sites
unexploded micro-nukes), there may have been significantly more than Team 8 Plus
these four, at the WTC. I believe all the evidence indicates that there were Flight 93 Hoax
likely more than these four. I also assert that the likely reason there were WTC Demolition
numerous defective nukes is because they had been sabotaged— and this The Ultimate Hijacker Compilation
was not realized by the perps until after the fact! There are numerous 9/11 Photo Analysis
possibilities. This could have been performed by elements of the military Evidence of Explosives on 9/11
who tried to save Americans from their fate. Another possibility is that the Demolition, the Truth of 9/11 and the
WTC
nukes could have been hidden in place for a long time, and gone bad. (Not
probable, IMO.) Sabotage could have been performed by others, even from collapse
far away, such as with neutrino beams, even through the Earth. As the end WTC Streaking Object, WTC7 theories
of this article indicates, neutrino-irradiated nukes may act as if they Flight 77 FOIA site
have undergone effective "evaporation of nuclear material.” And this Flight 93 Crash.com
negates the wiki/CIA claim above that these, or any other, nukes are Pentagon Research
“immune to all radiation.” Here we learn that Japan, in 1999, began Brad's Pentagon Analysis
through the Earth neutrino beaming, to distant targets. Always remember Where Is Osama (The Osama Clock)
that with such military and nuclear matters, and technologies, public
release of information is often decades after actual military use has gone 9/11 Flash Movies
on. There are other possibilities that could have led to the unknowing 9/11 chronology (network footage)
emplacement of sabotaged nukes, but that is described elsewhere by me. Buddy Buddy
Successful, redundant or replacement nukes may have been of a different Pentagon Strike
design, or intensity, than the ones that “fizzled”. 911 Questions
Note that the scenario of a small nuke whose core is sabotaged, via Reasonably reliable "Conspiracy Sites"
removal of sufficient fissile material to prevent complete criticality, and full that question 9/11
chain reaction, was depicted in the 1997 Kidman/Clooney movie, Rigorous Intuition
Wing TV
“Peacemaker.” This form of sabotage would not likely be relevant here (due
Xymphora
to detectability by the perps emplacing them.) More likely is the scenario
Killtown's Blog
(neutrinos) described above (or something similar), that would have
allowed for having previously, and surreptiously sabotaged numerous Center for an Informed America
nukes. George Washington
What happened, and didn’t happen, to WTC7 is crucial to this scenario. Prison Planet (Alex Jones)
New information regarding earlier explosions in WTC7 will soon be Daily Two Minutes of Hate
detailed. Recall the following. I first wrote that WTC7’s demise was a The Emperor's New Clothes
conventional controlled demolition (CD). Then in a later article, I revised Public Action (Carol Valentine)
this and wrote that I had become certain that WTC7 was a nuclear CD, not Propaganda Matrix
a conventional CD. I quoted the unimpeachable source, Fire Engineering Daniel Hopsicker
Professor, Dr. Barnett who had observed remnants of vaporized steel “from Cryptome
extraordinarily high temperatures” in the WTC7 rubble. I had conclusively Crimes and Corruptions of the New
World Order News
proven, by then, that the months long eyewitnessed and photographed high Covert 2 Overt Analysis
temperatures and molten steel was accurate despite all the desperate
disinfo from the OCT and DEW crowd(s). The difference between my earlier
WTC7 hypotheses and this article is, in part, due to the well-hidden fact of Good Intro Books to
WTC7 explosions during the time of the towers’ destructions. It is now clear Alternative 9/11 Truth
to me that they didn’t demolish WTC7 earlier that morning, because they "The New Pearl Harbor, Disturbing
couldn’t— but not the way I wrote months ago. They couldn’t destroy WTC7 Questions About the Bush
early that morning, because they tried, and it “fizzled.” Griffin
Ray Griffin
Let us now examine WTC7 in detail. We have Tris McCall of Jersey 9/11 Revealed by Rowland Morgan and
City, NJ. on November 24, 2003 stating, “I said I'd talk a little bit Ian Henshall
more about WTC7…From our vantage point atop the palisade, we could "9/11 Synthetic Terror, Made in USA" by
Webster G. Tarpley
see the top stories of the trapezoidal structure peeking out between the
skyscrapers of Battery Park City….Just before the fall of the North Tower, Thompson
we saw a large explosion coming from the street-level area around World "Crossing the Rubicon" by Michael C.
Ruppert
Trade Center 7. …it looked distinctly like a bomb had been detonated
underneath the city, and, of course, that's exactly what I thought had Hopsicker
occurred.” On 9/11 itself, the major media put this out: “After the initial
blast, Housing Authority worker Barry Jennings reported to a command
center on the 23rd floor of 7 World Trade Center. He was with Michael "Conspiracy Sites" that deal with 9/11
Hess, the city's corporation counsel. They were the only ones there. They that I have significant issues with
felt and heard another explosion, probably the collapse of one building. He What Really Happened
broke a window and screamed for help. Then they went down a stairwell. "I From the Wilderness (Mike Ruppert)
Arctic Beacon
told Hess, `We've got to try to get out of here."' They got to the lobby, or
what was left of it. "I thought I was dead. The whole building shook. ... I
looked around, the lobby was gone. It looked like hell. It was like a bad Unreliable "Conspiracy Sites" that deal
movie. Though covered in soot, Jennings was not physically injured. He with 9/11
said Hess escaped safely as well.” Note how the article tries to claim that Break for News
the lobby blast was from the collapse of another WTC building. But now we Tom Flocco
learn that Jennings was the Deputy Director of the Emergency Services
Dept. of the NYC Housing Authority, and is now stating he is certain that
he heard and felt explosions in WTC7, shortly after 9 A.M. First as he is Democratic/Progressive News Sites,
coming down the stairs at about the eighth floor. Then there is proof of a Blogs and Miscellaneous Links
large explosion that impacts the WTC7 lobby. Jennings first indicates he is Buzzflash
The Raw Story
sure the “fuel/oil tank explosion” explanation is bogus. Then he says, “I
heard explosions… [Note the plural.] The lobby was totally destroyed…
They had to take me out through a make-shift hole in the wall the fire dept.
Think Progress
had to make to get me out.” Then Alex Jones comes on this Youtube Citizens for a Legitimate Government
piece and says that all this happened within minutes of the first “plane Common Dreams
hit”— before either tower’s “collapse.” Other information is that this Consortium News
happened in between the two tower demolitions. Jones says that Jennings Center for Cooperative Research
also says (in the full tape) he saw numerous dead bodies, presumably in Cursor
the lobby, and was told not to look at them. Could the reason Jennings is Guerrilla News
told not to examine the bodies be that they showed evidence of being Online Journal
nuked? The Memory Hole
Press Action
I assert that the explosions Jennings hears, and News from Babylon
experiences, in WTC7 were one or more fizzled nukes. What Unknown News
TV News Lies
would happen to WTC7 at 5:20 P.M. was actually meant to happen at
about the same time as all the other WTC buildings were destroyed! Is it
Eschaton
not likely that WTC7 was also planned for simultaneous destruction? I don’t
Daily Kos
blame Jennings for hiding out, if his story is true, nor for being too scared Talking Points Memo
for six years to tell his more complete story. Now any dead bodies Hullabaloo
Jennings saw in the WTC7 lobby, were likely from these fizzled nukes. I Billmon
assert that WTC7 was not demolished early on, with the other buildings, The Brad Blog
because all its nukes-- including the redundant one(s)-- fizzled, as Jesus' General
described above! I further now hypothesize that this matter, fizzled nukes, The Rude Pundit
is likely the reason for the long 7-8 hour delay— even beyond the planned The Poor Man
time that the regime errantly pre-told the media— for the WTC7 “collapse.” Juan Cole (Informed Comment)
The perps were likely replacing defective nukes! This would have taken Today in Iraq
time to get them from wherever they were brought in from. Apparently all Antiwar.com
nukes in WTC7, despite redundancy, were defective, again, IMO, likely Iraq Coalition Casualties
sabotaged. And it took a few hours to get replacements, possibly even Constant Pated
Clusterfuck Nation
needing time to test, or try to test, the new ones before emplacing them in
Donkey Rising
WTC7? Indeed I would hypothesize that perhaps even the errant early
Salon
notice to the worldwide media that WTC7 HAD ALREADY COLLAPSED,
Slate
was once again due to another defective nuke unexpectedly “fizzling!” So it
seems that my hypothesized scenario of defective, likely sabotaged, nukes
and replacing them as needed (WTC7), appears to explain every single My Other Blogs
anomalous fact on 9/11, and the China Syndrome afterwards. Humint Events Online
There are other related anomalous WTC7 matters. We see that WTC7 Fake Opposition Democrats
was ordered evacuated at 9:03. I guess the federal perps knew the Al-CIA-duh
end result ahead of time, and ordered their own to leave immediately, Ghost Plane
Flight 93 Hoax
while people in WTC1 and 2 were told to stay in, or go back to, their
offices!! Maximize the deaths of the citizens, and minimize the deaths of
the feds. Some of the 9/11 perps may have been agents working in WTC7,
but the vast majority, I would presume would not know of the matter, or its
details. All reports of the earlier explosions in WTC7 would be hidden by
the lackey media. During the 7-8 hour interval, firefighters were not allowed
to fight the relatively small fires that likely resulted from “fizzled” nukes. You
wouldn’t want firefighters to witness many things, including federal perps
bringing in the replacement—- “better” nukes! Likely those perps would be
wearing radiation-protecting garb. While the WTC7 fires would be “officially”
blamed on ejecta from WTC 1 or 2, photos of WTC7 show limited damage
to the facade which cannot account for the complete global "collapse" of
the tower.
Moreover, the lobby of WTC7 was shielded by the presence of WTC6 from
any ejecta from WTC1 and 2. The first WTC7 explosions are now said to
have occurred before any tower destruction. Now regarding these fires
several floors up, there could have been one or more mini-nukes that
fizzled therein, or criticality fragments from partially exploded defective
nukes could have been blasted up a few floors. Recall the Chernobyl
core explosion that blasted off the roof itself and left some
30 criticality fragments burning away on the roofs of
adjacent buildings— the China Syndrome. And I trust you know
why WTC7 could not get a reprieve? It was even more imperative now for
the perps to “eliminate” WTC7, because its lobby, basement and possibly
some of the floors where fires were, now contained the proof of one or
more fizzled nukes— the nuclear reacting criticality fragments that link
back to the U.S. regime, and not 19 Arabs and “plane hits.”
Perhaps all redundant nukes in the towers that finally, successfully Flight 93 article and picture gallery
exploded were of a different type than the fizzled ones. Redundant nukes
that were successfully exploded in the towers’ upper floors, after any initial
“fizzled” nukes went off at those levels, would have widely dispersed the Miscellaneous Items of Interest
fizzled nukes’ contents which had presumably undergone partial criticality CNN infiltrated by US Army Psy-ops
(nuclear reacting fragments). Of course, even properly functioning nukes US National Debt Clock
will give off some radioactivity, but Hiroshima, and Nagasaki did not have The American Taliban
surface hotspots, for weeks and months. Now, at the WTC, these
fragments gave rise to the widespread hotspots all over the Peak Oil and
WTC, after the “collapses” were over. These areas thus had Sustainability/Environmental Sites
to be massively, repeatedly washed down, and treated with The Association for the Study of Peak
dirt, that was then removed and carted away (as was the Oil and Gas
neutron-bombarded metal itself)— this took weeks. Thus we The Oil Drum
had the high temperatures, melted firemen’s’ boots, etc. Land of Black Gold
from surface hotspots. Fizzled nukes, in the sub-basement levels of Flying Talking Donkey
the three skyscrapers were entrapped therein, and thus were effectively Life After the Oil Crash
Richard Heinberg
more concentrated, and nearly impossible to “treat” with dirt or water, and
Grist
not reachable for months. These deep underground hotspots stayed hot for
six months or so (as documented at this blog), giving rise, all the while, to
such phenomena as molten steel for six months. The Official 9/11 Story IS a
Conspiracy Theory!
To sum up, it appears that this author has herein revealed a consistent people conspiring to commit a crime. The official
scenario that includes the cause of the resultant, and now massively 9/11 narrative, as codified by the 9/11
documented, China Syndrome of high temperatures, molten steel, and likely explanation for the events of 9/11/01. The
nuclear irradiation of responders, and NYC residents, and the long WTC7 official 9/11 story is therefore a theory. This
demolition delay— namely defective, likely sabotaged, nukes and the time "CONSPIRACY THEORY"!
interval needed for replacement (WTC7). Possible mechanisms for the
hidden nuclear bomb sabotage have also been revealed here. I assert this
is now the most consistent, and perhaps the simplest, scenario that
includes the most heretofore inexplicable factors— long WTC7 destruction I have no fondness for any religion, as I think it
delay, errant WTC7 destruction time given to the media, the WTC7 Islamic terrorists do exist and I detest them as
“preliminary” explosions, and the resultant China Syndrome, with the much as I detest the true perpetrators of 9/11.
greatest and longest time-line for very high temperatures and molten metal patsies in 9/11, as part of a highly organized
underneath the three skyscrapers of the WTC, all of which had one or goverment and US military.
more “fizzled” nukes! This article may have eliminated the last mysteries of
the nuking of the WTC on 9/11 by the Federal American regime. It is up to
each of you now to promulgate this! The life you save may be your own!
<< Home
World Trade Center Demolition: Basement Nukes and Top-Down Demolition

Monday, December 31, 2007 trade center buildings 1, 2
Basement Nukes and Top-Down Demolition demolition.
Various people have suggested that the basement of the WTC was blown
with high explosives (even nuked) prior to, and/or concomitant with, the About Me
top-down demolition that was performed to obliterate the towers.
Name: spooked
I have always been somewhat unsure of this idea for the simple reason that
it wasn't clear to me how exactly basement bombs/nukes fit in with the top- The official 9/11 story is a lie. The 9/11 plane
down demolition-- plus there was the fact that during the demolitions, part hijackings and crashes were clever hoaxes. The
of the inner cores for each tower remained standing after the initial WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7 towers were brought
demolition phase. down by demolition, and there is evidence for the
However, this post from 911blogger provides more evidence for WTC1 and 2. All in all, 9/11 was a massive and
explosions at the base of the tower concomitant with demolition. cruel hoax foisted upon the world, done in order
Thinking about this some more, I have an idea for how basement bombs financial fraud and to further the ends of the
would have been used. global elite. 9/11 was only the most egregious of
Here we see the remnants of tower one-- and clearly there is a section of
the core remaining in the center of the blasted out debris: View my complete profile

General 9/11 Sites

9/11 Blimp
9/11 Busters
9/11 CGI Watch
9/11 Complicity
9/11 Cover-Up
9/11 Dossier (UK)
9/11 Encyclopedia
9/11 Foreknowledge
9/11 Hoax
9/11 Oddities
9/11 Overview
(click to enlarge; you can see the people better to give scale) 9/11 Oz (Australian)
9/11 Plot
The key here is that IN FACT, only PART of the core is remaining-- what 9/11 Proof
looks like only the very center of the core-- perhaps a dozen columns at 9/11 Research (Jim Hoffman)
most. 9/11 Resources
9/11 Review.org
The core was made of 47 absolutely MASSIVE columns-- just think that the 9/11 Review.com
http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2007/12/basement-nukes-and-top-down-demolition.html[07.11.2010 14:57:51]
core columns that would make up the core at the base of the tower carried 9/11 Stealth
much of the weight of those huge towers above. Clearly, most of these 9/11 Strike
massive columns have been blown away from their original location. Note, 9/11 True Story
it's not like there is debris is covering these columns-- the columns have 9/11 "U"
either been knocked/blown away or they have been blown to pieces. Given 9/11 Verses
that the very center core columns survived the "onslaught" (see the Awoken Research Group
picture), it is not clear why the just as strong outer core columns wouldn't Thompson)
survive-- unless they were literally blown away at the base. Finnish 9/11 Site
What seems plausible-- even likely-- is that several basement nukes took Gallerize
out the core columns at the sides or corners of the core section. A partial German Engineers 9/11 site
dismemberment of the core could conceivably facilitate a top-down Hybrideb's 9/11 site
collapse by taking away some of the supports between the floors and the Icelandic 9/11 site
core. This would give explosive devices on the upper floors an easier time Jane Doe's 9/11 site
in peeling the outer walls from the core remnant. Which is really what Juscogen's 9/11 site
happened-- the outer walls peeled away from the tower from top to bottom, Killtown
in an explosive sequence-- leaving an inner core remnant that then must
have been blown from below from the lower floors to leave the small
column remnants seen in the picture above.
Let's Roll 9/11
But the key here is that basement bombs-- almost certainly nukes-- would Essay
be used to take out PART OF THE CORE specifically to facilitate the top- Morgan Reynolds 9/11 Commission
Essay
down collapse.
Nerdcities 9/11
posted by spooked @ 11:26 AM Operation 9/11
Planet Quo 9/11
RINF 9/11 Archive
<< Home
by Gerard Holmgren)
Shunned
Physics 911
Physics 9/11.co.nr
Plague Puppy's Cafe
Question 911
Truth 911
Brad's 911 site
Club Ivy's 911 site
Stop the Lie 9/11
Total 9/11 Info
Questions Questions
The Web Fairy
Wing TV
9/11 Activism
9/11 Blogger
911 Truth.org
911 Truth LA.us
911 Truth LA.org
911 Truth Emergence
911 We Know
9-11 UK
NY 9/11 Truth

Summer of Truth
Proposition 911
Reopen 911
Deception Dollars
Justice for 9/11

Team 8 Plus
Flight 93 Hoax
WTC Demolition
9/11 Photo Analysis
WTC
collapse
Flight 77 FOIA site
Flight 93 Crash.com
Pentagon Research
9/11 Flash Movies

Buddy Buddy
Pentagon Strike
911 Questions

that question 9/11
Rigorous Intuition
Wing TV
Xymphora
Killtown's Blog
George Washington
Propaganda Matrix
Daniel Hopsicker
Cryptome
World Order News
Good Intro Books to

Griffin
Ray Griffin
Ian Henshall
Webster G. Tarpley
Thompson

Ruppert
Hopsicker

Arctic Beacon

with 9/11
Break for News
Tom Flocco

Buzzflash
The Raw Story
Think Progress
Common Dreams
Consortium News
Cursor
Guerrilla News
Online Journal
The Memory Hole
Press Action
News from Babylon
Unknown News
TV News Lies
Eschaton
Daily Kos
Talking Points Memo
Hullabaloo
Billmon
The Brad Blog
Jesus' General
The Rude Pundit
The Poor Man
Today in Iraq
Antiwar.com
Constant Pated
Clusterfuck Nation
Donkey Rising
Salon
Slate
My Other Blogs
Al-CIA-duh
Ghost Plane
Flight 93 Hoax


Peak Oil and

Oil and Gas
The Oil Drum
Land of Black Gold
Richard Heinberg
Grist

Conspiracy Theory!
World Trade Center Demolition: Breakthrough: The Story Of Cathy T, & The Large Earthquake That Was Felt One Mile Away When WTC1 Was “...

Tuesday, February 12, 2008 trade center buildings 1, 2
Breakthrough: The Story Of Cathy T, & The Large demolition.
Earthquake That Was Felt One Mile Away When
WTC1 Was “Hit”!
About Me
Cathy T. who lives, and works, in her apartment, which is about one mile
north of the WTC, has this breaking story. Furthermore, the following The official 9/11 story is a lie. The 9/11 plane
events were witnessed by two people present with Cathy during these hijackings and crashes were clever hoaxes. The
occurrences. Cathy recalls these events occurred between 8:30 and 9 A.M. WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7 towers were brought
on 9/11/01 Note that WTC1 was “officially hit” at about 8:46 A.M. down by demolition, and there is evidence for the
Cathy, to the best of her recollection, recalls “about four seismic events” in WTC1 and 2. All in all, 9/11 was a massive and
her apartment— which is between the 10th and 20th floor of her building-- cruel hoax foisted upon the world, done in order
with “the first one being the largest”, and “the other three were significantly to spark the obscene "war on terror", to cover up
less intense” and can now be seen to likely be after-shocks, that “came in financial fraud and to further the ends of the
approx. 30 sec intervals after the main one.” Cathy says she can never global elite. 9/11 was only the most egregious of
forget seeing “books fall off their shelves”, and seeing or feeling the “floor several other recent false-flag terror operations.
jumping up and down”, and her almost losing her balance at that time
between 8:30 and 9.00 A.M. She did not know, at the time about what was
happening, or just happened, at the WTC. She says she did not experience
these things when the second tower was “hit.” It is also important to note More 9/11 Links (Note: I present a wide
that Cathy T did not experience any Seismic activity during either “collapse’ variety of 9/11 sites here for the
event. purposes of diversity. I leave it up to
All this indicates the “official” regime Seismic recordings are a farce, as I
have previously written and had published here. The Seismic “readings”
General 9/11 Sites
admittedly are “re-analyses” of data, as requested by the regime. Now
9/11 Blimp
according to the US Geological Survey, the “collapse” maxima of 2.1 and
9/11 Busters
2.3 might not be felt even right where it was occurring, or just barely felt
9/11 CGI Watch
and not cause the effects Cathy felt a mile away from the first “plane hit.”
Though I am a physicist and not a geologist, I have been in 5.1 9/11 Complicity
Earthquakes and have done some reading on these matters. IMO, to be 9/11 Cover-Up
transmitted at such a level of intensity one mile north, and possibly further, 9/11 Dossier (UK)
directly implies a seismic level of at least 4.0, at the origin. There is always
9/11 Encyclopedia
the possibility that wave phenomena led to reinforcements at local hotpsots
(perhaps anti-nodes) which included her building. The spikes of the two 9/11 Foreknowledge
“plane impacts” are “officially” 0.9 and 0.7 respectively. Far greater energy 9/11 Hoax
than is contained in quakes of these levels would be needed to cause the 9/11 Oddities
events felt by Cathy T, a mile away. Thus, I assert, the “plane hit” spikes in
9/11 Overview
the seismographs were likely greatly truncated! (As were the “collapse”
spikes.) Now it is questionable whether a plane hit, or an explosion, high up 9/11 Plot
would transmit much energy to the ground as the energy would likely first 9/11 Proof
be absorbed by the building itself. But if a simultaneous sub-basement 9/11 Research (Jim Hoffman)
nuke was set off, this would likely have a large seismic spike that would 9/11 Resources
need to be “re-analyzed/truncated” as the gov’t requested. 9/11 Review.org
9/11 Review.com
http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2008/02/breakthrough-story-of-cathy-t-large.html[07.11.2010 14:59:17]
So tying the eyewitness report of Cathy T. to my earlier articles, it is likely 9/11 Stealth
that in the nuclear demolition of the WTC towers, perhaps the largest 9/11 Strike
nukes employed occurred in the sub-basements, using the “plane hits” as 9/11 True Story
“camouflage.” And that many smaller nukes were used during the actual 9/11 "U"
demolition-- along with some conventional explosives as I have detailed 9/11 Verses
previously. Awoken Research Group
Thompson)
Recall also that earlier I have stated that other regime-released “scientific” Finnish 9/11 Site
data is bogus. This includes the second AVIRIS (ground tempeature) data Finnish 9/11 Site in English
set; and this has been massively verified by other data and countless Gallerize
eyewitnesses, molten boots and more. And this article I wrote, also has a German Engineers 9/11 site
fireman describing a seismic event during collapse that had to be Hybrideb's 9/11 site
significantly more than a 2.1 or 2.3. Icelandic 9/11 site
http://covertoperations.blogspot.com/2007/11/eyewitness-testimony-of- Juscogen's 9/11 site
firefighters.html Killtown
It also contains: eyewitness testimony of firefighters believing they were
nuked on 9/11 from feeling great heat on their skin without any fire near
Let's Roll 9/11
them, as well as early WTC7 destruction, Electromagetic Pulse, non-impact Morgan Reynolds WTC Demolition
plane flyby, and people being pushed out of a WTC tower. Essay
Essay
From the timing that Cathy relates, these seismic events appear to have
occurred around the time that the first (CGI) plane “impacted” the first
Nerdcities 9/11
tower. This is further support for my hypotheses, appearing in my articles, Operation 9/11
that each time a CGI plane “hit” a tower, (actually upper explosions set off), Planet Quo 9/11
the regime also set off a basement nuke. (As I have written, to allow for Rick Siegel (9/11 Eyewitness)
bottom over collapse, in case the intricate top-bottom collapse--which RINF 9/11 Archive
involved many mini-nukes--failed to occur. I have written herein on the Terrorize (Danish 911 site)
need for redundancy by the regime.) Recall I have quoted engineers that The Mysteries of 9/11
stated that a sub-basement floor and garage were “just gone,” and that a THE TRUTH ABOUT SEPT 11 (Compiled
by Gerard Holmgren)
50-ton steel press was vaporized, and that a steel/concrete door was
Shunned
shriveled up like aluminum foil-- all at the time of the first “plane hit”.
Physics 911
(Statements made by Engineer Mike Pecoraro. See:
Physics 9/11.co.nr
http://covertoperations.blogspot.com/2007/08/by-anonymous-physicist- Plague Puppy's Cafe
sgt.html Plague Puppy: Alternate Site
and my other nuclear demolition articles at Question 911
www.wtcdemolition.blogpsot.com) Truth 911
Brad's 911 site
Of course all this, and the now revealed much larger earthquake(s) felt a Club Ivy's 911 site
mile away, can only arise from nukes-- and not from gravitational collapse Brad's old 9/11 site
of pristine pancakes, or evidence-free and cold DEW, or thermite which Flamesong 9/11 Essay and Links
never vaporized anything let alone whole floors and massive steel presses. Serendipity (various essays on 9/11)
Neither does thermite stay hot for months and cause the China Syndrome Stop the Lie 9/11
of radioactive fragments generating high heat for months, and thus the The Strange Images of 9/11/2001
molten metal still seen six months later. See here www.wtc- Total 9/11 Info
chinasyndrome.blogspot.com
Questions Questions
The Web Fairy
So we now have eyewitness testimony that larger earthquakes-- which
Wing TV
directly implies nuclear bomb use-- occurred on 9/11, than the regime has
allowed to promulgate, via its Goebbels-like MSM, or the intel agency-
controlled “911truth” forums. 9/11 Activism
9/11 Blogger
See who posts this now. Please post this yourselves! 9/11 Citizens' Watch
posted by spooked @ 5:22 AM 911 Truth.org
911 Truth LA.us
911 Truth LA.org
911 Truth Emergence
911 We Know
<< Home 911 Truth Movement Musings
9-11 UK
NY 9/11 Truth

Summer of Truth
Proposition 911
Reopen 911
Deception Dollars
Justice for 9/11

Team 8 Plus
Flight 93 Hoax
WTC Demolition
9/11 Photo Analysis
WTC
collapse
Flight 77 FOIA site
Flight 93 Crash.com
Pentagon Research
9/11 Flash Movies

Buddy Buddy
Pentagon Strike
911 Questions

that question 9/11
Rigorous Intuition
Wing TV
Xymphora
Killtown's Blog
George Washington
Propaganda Matrix
Daniel Hopsicker
Cryptome
World Order News
Good Intro Books to

Griffin
Ray Griffin
Ian Henshall
Webster G. Tarpley
Thompson

Ruppert
Hopsicker

Arctic Beacon

with 9/11
Break for News
Tom Flocco

Buzzflash
The Raw Story
Think Progress
Common Dreams
Consortium News
Cursor
Guerrilla News
Online Journal
The Memory Hole
Press Action
News from Babylon
Unknown News
TV News Lies
Eschaton
Daily Kos
Talking Points Memo
Hullabaloo
Billmon
The Brad Blog
Jesus' General
The Rude Pundit
The Poor Man
Today in Iraq
Antiwar.com
Constant Pated
Clusterfuck Nation
Donkey Rising
Salon
Slate
My Other Blogs
Al-CIA-duh
Ghost Plane
Flight 93 Hoax


Peak Oil and

Oil and Gas
The Oil Drum
Land of Black Gold
Richard Heinberg
Grist

Conspiracy Theory!
World Trade Center Demolition: More On the Immediate and Continous Radiation Lowering, and Shielding, Techniques Used at the WTC, after 9...

Thursday, March 27, 2008 trade center buildings 1, 2
More On the Immediate and Continous Radiation demolition.
Lowering, and Shielding, Techniques Used at the
WTC, after 9/11
About Me
by The Anonymous Physicist Name: spooked
Recall I have stated that the acts of trucking in (and out) of sand/earth, that
began the very morning after 9/11, were likely done to lower the radiation The official 9/11 story is a lie. The 9/11 plane
levels at the WTC. I have hypothesized that Mayor Giuliani got the word hijackings and crashes were clever hoaxes. The
from the federal perps to do this after the perps knew of the radiation/China WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7 towers were brought
Syndrome at “Ground Zero.” The perps knew this because they knew the down by demolition, and there is evidence for the
types of nukes they had used, and had either agents on the ground use of small nuclear bombs in the demolition of
assaying radiation levels, or had planes or satellites doing this from above. WTC1 and 2. All in all, 9/11 was a massive and
Hosing down the rubble pile with water also began as soon as they got the cruel hoax foisted upon the world, done in order
trucks and crews down there to this. This continued for months, as the to spark the obscene "war on terror", to cover up
photographic evidence clearly indicates. financial fraud and to further the ends of the
Now I would like to present to you some corroboration that these two several other recent false-flag terror operations.
methods are used to lower radiation levels, and /or act as shielding, for
people in the vicinity of nuclear radiation. View my complete profile
The Safety Handbook of the Alberta (Canada) Forest Products Association

describes what to do in case of various emergencies. In the case of More 9/11 Links (Note: I present a wide
radiation exposure, it says for “Shielding: Use shielding between yourself variety of 9/11 sites here for the
and the source of radiation. Equipment, concrete blocks, and PILES OF purposes of diversity. I leave it up to
DIRT OR GRAVEL often provide makeshift shielding.” you to judge their content.)
http://www.albertaforestproducts.ca/document_library/PPSOHandbook2004.pdf
As Judy Wood’s site indicated (for incorrect reasons, of course)
General 9/11 Sites
http://drjudywood.com/articles/dirt/dirt3.html#bucketbrigade 9/11 Blimp
trucks began carrying sand/earth in—and out—of the WTC the next 9/11 Busters
morning. Carrying away the sand/earth may have had the same purpose as 9/11 CGI Watch
selling the WTC steel to China did—to hide the radioactive evidence. 9/11 Closeup (Gerard Holmgren)
9/11 Complicity
Wiki has several articles that are relevant here too. First this article 9/11 Cover-Up
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiation_shielding“ states how 9/11 Dossier (UK)
paper and water can shield people from radiation: “Alpha radiation is the
9/11 Encyclopedia
easiest to shield, because the very massive alpha particles can be stopped
even with a leaf of paper. Beta radiation (electrons) is more difficult… 9/11 Foreknowledge
shielding must be accomplished with low density materials, e.g. plastic, 9/11 Hoax
wood, WATER or acrylic glass.” 9/11 Oddities
The importance of shielding from beta radiation emitted by fissile material is 9/11 Overview
indicated in another wiki article here 9/11 Oz (Australian)
9/11 Plot
http://en.wikipediaorg/wiki/Nuclear_fission “Most nuclear fuels
9/11 Proof
undergo spontaneous fission only very slowly, decaying mainly via an
alpha/beta decay…. Fission products tend to be beta emitters…”
9/11 Resources
9/11 Review.org
The following source
9/11 Review.com
http://moorcat.com/pragmatic_revolt/2006/04/20/nuclear-
http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2008/03/more-on-immediate-and-continous.html[07.11.2010 14:59:53]
9/11 Stealth
power-101/ appears to be written by someone well familiar with the ins
9/11 Strike
and outs of nuclear reactors, and an almost rabid proponent of them—- 9/11 True Story
which I am not. He states how well water can reduce radiation levels in a 9/11 "U"
nuclear reactor: “24 inches of water reduces radiation by a factor of 10 -- 9/11 Verses
therefore it is called a tenth thickness…” Awoken Research Group
The photos and text from Joel Meyerowitz’ book indicate that the water Thompson)
hosing down of the rubble pile was a massive, continuous effort for months. Finnish 9/11 Site
I would add that water hosing, and the subsequent steam seen emitted Finnish 9/11 Site in English
many times, also carried away heat as well as lowered radiation. The Gallerize
water’s temperature is raised, and then more energy is used up in the German Engineers 9/11 site
conversion to steam—very much like what happens in a nuclear reactor. Hybrideb's 9/11 site
Icelandic 9/11 site
Now these sand/earth and water treatments were of limited use against the Jane Doe's 9/11 site
fissioning fragments at the bottom of the rubble pile, and in the sub- Juscogen's 9/11 site
basement areas of the towers and WTC7. But here distance and Killtown
inaccessibility acted as shielding for the vast majority of the responders.
Only a few were allowed access to the basement areas, it is known. So it is
clear that until carted away, the radioactive fission fragments at the WTC
Let's Roll 9/11
(aka the China Syndrome)--causing the great heat in the rubble pile (for Morgan Reynolds WTC Demolition
threee months), and the even greater temperatures, and flowing molten Essay
metal up to six months, after 9/11, underneath the towers and WTC7--had Morgan Reynolds 9/11 Commission
Essay
continuous radiation-lowering, and shielding, methods applied to them.
Undoubtedly even more cancers and radiation sicknesses would have Nerdcities 9/11
Operation 9/11
resulted among responders, and the local inhabitants, if these sand/earth,
Planet Quo 9/11
and water, measures were not undertaken. These methods lowered the
radiation exposure to responders, they provided “makeshift shielding, ” and
RINF 9/11 Archive
they also carried away heat. I am not stating this was done out of any Terrorize (Danish 911 site)
concern for the responders, or New York metro area inhabitants; but rather The Mysteries of 9/11
to try to hide the nuking of the WTC, and the China Syndrome aftermath. THE TRUTH ABOUT SEPT 11 (Compiled
But the evidence of all that can be found in the archived articles at by Gerard Holmgren)
wtcdemolition.blogspot.com and wtc- Shunned
chinasyndromeblogspot.com. Physics 911
Physics 9/11.co.nr
What we should never forget, at this point, is what was learned in the long- Plague Puppy's Cafe
term studies of Hiroshima and Nagasaki survivors Plague Puppy: Alternate Site
http://www.ehponline.org/members/2006/9113/9113.html. It Question 911
took decades for many survivors of those nukes to get cancer or other Truth 911
Brad's 911 site
illnesses. The already known 400 (as of 2006) blood, lymph and thyroid
Club Ivy's 911 site
cancers—all common among people exposed to radiation--among 911
responders is likely, and sadly, a drop in the bucket, compared to what
may be coming. And, as far as I know, studies to see if there has been an Serendipity (various essays on 9/11)
increase of cancer, and/or other immune disorders, among the millions of Stop the Lie 9/11
New York metro inhabitants, since 9/11/01, have not been undertaken. The Strange Images of 9/11/2001
Total 9/11 Info
posted by spooked @ 5:40 AM Unanswered Questions
Questions Questions
The Web Fairy
Wing TV
<< Home
9/11 Activism
9/11 Blogger
911 Truth.org
911 Truth LA.us
911 Truth LA.org
911 Truth Emergence
911 We Know
9-11 UK
NY 9/11 Truth

Summer of Truth
Proposition 911
Reopen 911
Deception Dollars
Justice for 9/11

Team 8 Plus
Flight 93 Hoax
WTC Demolition
9/11 Photo Analysis
WTC
collapse
Flight 77 FOIA site
Flight 93 Crash.com
Pentagon Research
9/11 Flash Movies

Buddy Buddy
Pentagon Strike
911 Questions

that question 9/11
Rigorous Intuition
Wing TV
Xymphora
Killtown's Blog
George Washington
Propaganda Matrix
Daniel Hopsicker
Cryptome
World Order News
Good Intro Books to

Griffin
Ray Griffin
Ian Henshall
Webster G. Tarpley
Thompson

Ruppert
Hopsicker

Arctic Beacon

with 9/11
Break for News
Tom Flocco

Buzzflash
The Raw Story
Think Progress
Common Dreams
Consortium News
Cursor
Guerrilla News
Online Journal
The Memory Hole
Press Action
News from Babylon
Unknown News
TV News Lies
Eschaton
Daily Kos
Talking Points Memo
Hullabaloo
Billmon
The Brad Blog
Jesus' General
The Rude Pundit
The Poor Man
Today in Iraq
Antiwar.com
Constant Pated
Clusterfuck Nation
Donkey Rising
Salon
Slate
My Other Blogs
Al-CIA-duh
Ghost Plane
Flight 93 Hoax


Peak Oil and

Oil and Gas
The Oil Drum
Land of Black Gold
Richard Heinberg
Grist

Conspiracy Theory!
World Trade Center Demolition: The Final Word on The Tritium

Thursday, July 02, 2009 trade center buildings 1, 2
The Final Word on The Tritium demolition.

About Me
Name: spooked
I have written, that after long and careful analyses, the best bet for the
main factor that destroyed the WTC on 9/11/01 were numerous, small,
fission bombs. Others have claimed that one (hypothetical) 4th generation, The official 9/11 story is a lie. The 9/11 plane
pure fusion nuclear bomb destroyed each tower. This is what the hijackings and crashes were clever hoaxes. The
anonymous Finnish military expert wrote. And the Finn apparently based WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7 towers were brought
his entire 4th generation pure fusion hypothesis on the finding of tritium at down by demolition, and there is evidence for the
the WTC on 9/13/01. Since he was the first person to publish any specific use of small nuclear bombs in the demolition of
nuclear destruction scenario for 9/11, many others cite his work as being WTC1 and 2. All in all, 9/11 was a massive and
definitive, or such. (He could still be correct, though this is extremely cruel hoax foisted upon the world, done in order
unlikely.) And so many who state that they are proponents of the nuclear to spark the obscene "war on terror", to cover up
destruction hypothesis of the WTC are proponents of the pure fusion financial fraud and to further the ends of the
mechanism, because the Finn is; and he cited the Tritium found at the global elite. 9/11 was only the most egregious of
WTC on 9/13/01. Or there could be a more sinister reason for these several other recent false-flag terror operations.
numerous individuals to support the pure fusion scenario.
Now the Finn apparently gave overarching consideration to the Tritium
found and published in the article, “Study of Traces of Tritium at
the World Trade Center” by T.M. Semkow, et al. It was
published at the 223rd American Chemical Society National Meeting,
Orlando, FL, April 7-11, 2002. The article states that “This work was
performed under the auspices of the United States Department of Energy
by the University of California, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
under contract No. W-7405-Eng-48.” (Note that this is the same lab that General 9/11 Sites
allegedly can create “super nano-composite thermite” that yields 9/11 Blimp
“unextinguishable fires,” and thus new laws of chemistry and physics as 9/11 Busters
well as the first equivalent perpetual motion mechanism. [If only.] It’s also 9/11 CGI Watch
the same lab that is remasterminding Kennedy Assassination audio tapes. 9/11 Closeup (Gerard Holmgren)
And I have some suspicions on what the “Eng” might mean.) It should be 9/11 Complicity
noted that this paper contains several bogus and ludicrous attempts to 9/11 Cover-Up
9/11 Dossier (UK)
account for the tritium at the WTC on 9/13. Mostly they allege that the
tritium came from exit signs on the planes that “crashed into the towers.” 9/11 Encyclopedia
The paper also alleges that tritium was in the sightings on the guns of 9/11 Foreknowledge
police officers killed that day. The first “mechanism” is obviously bogus, as 9/11 Hoax
there is not a single video that agrees with reality in that the “planes” are
9/11 Oddities
clearly just CGI broadcast on TV, and there was no credible evidence on
the ground that any planes had crashed into the towers, and did so with 9/11 Overview
blatantly, obvious impossible crash physics. Sources have also stated that 9/11 Oz (Australian)
the tritium claim on gun sightings is also bogus, if not totally, then regarding 9/11 Plot
the amount. 9/11 Proof
9/11 Resources
Being a long-term expert on gov’t conspiracies and crimes, I see the whole
9/11 Review.org
tritium matter very deeply. The regime can and does refuse to release
9/11 Review.com
anything damning. So why did they release any data showing tritium at all,
http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2009/07/final-word-on-tritium.html[07.11.2010 15:01:22]
9/11 Stealth
when they could have kept this under wraps, as I am sure FEMA is doing 9/11 Strike
with WTC radiation readings? One possible answer is that it would provide 9/11 True Story
a ruse for others to later claim the mythical 4th generation pure fusion 9/11 "U"
bomb was used-- thus obviating what was there in NYC for 6 months-- the 9/11 Verses
China Syndrome. And always remember, we are discussing the Lawrence Awoken Research Group
Livermore Labs, designers of humanity-exterminating WMD for more than Complete 9/11 Timeline (Paul
Thompson)
60 years, as well as the above nefarious actions, related to the thermite
Finnish 9/11 Site
hangout and JFK murder.
Gallerize
Now my first articles on my “many small nukes hypothesis” cited evidence German Engineers 9/11 site
for both fission and fusion at the WTC. I too ignored one important factor in Hybrideb's 9/11 site
these matters for a while-- but I have changed that in later articles and in a Icelandic 9/11 site
larger work-- but have not played this up at this blog, and wish to rectify Jane Doe's 9/11 site
this now. I have also written that it may be more than coincidence that a Juscogen's 9/11 site
4th generation pure fusion bomb does not allow for what we clearly had at Killtown
the WTC for up to six months-- the China Syndrome of great heat Oil and Empire 9/11 (Mark Robinowitz)
GENERATION from the remnants of the many fission bombs, Portland Indy Media 9/11
as each used only about 1-6% of its fissile material. That is, 119 Questions about 9/11
pure fusion does not allow for the China Syndrome as any remnants of Let's Roll 9/11
pure fusion components (such as deuterium or tritium) do not allow for this- Morgan Reynolds WTC Demolition
Essay
- only Uranium or Plutonium fissioning can. Note that a fission-triggered Morgan Reynolds 9/11 Commission
fusion bomb could still allow for the China Syndrome. Only the pure fusion Essay
scenario does not. So it is curious that the Finn immediately went with pure Missile Gate (analysis of 1st hit)
fusion, and not with the possibility of fission-triggered fusion. And the Finn Nerdcities 9/11
based this on the tritium finding, and either did not know about, or chose to Operation 9/11
ignore, all the evidence of massive heat generation at the WTC for 6 Planet Quo 9/11
months, and also the following matter.
RINF 9/11 Archive
One factor from nuclear physics has been mostly left out of this “nuclear
choice.” This is TERNARY FISSION, and was included in William Tahil’s THE TRUTH ABOUT SEPT 11 (Compiled
book. Unfortunately that book was shown by this researcher to be incorrect by Gerard Holmgren)
on several points. These included the “nuclear reactor” hypothesis being Shunned
thoroughly unnecessary and impossible, as is his and the Finn’s claim that Physics 911
a single nuke destroyed each tower. (Tahil also incorrectly stated that a Physics 9/11.co.nr
fission nuke uses up 100% of its fissile material, when it is only 1-6%.) I Plague Puppy's Cafe
have also cited much evidence both of a preliminary sub-basement nuke Plague Puppy: Alternate Site
Question 911
timed with the explosions on top (so-called “plane hits”), and that the final
Truth 911
destruction involved numerous small nukes. So the single nuke scenario,
Brad's 911 site
from the Finn and Tahil, is untenable.
Club Ivy's 911 site
Now most fission reactions of Uranium or Plutonium are binary-- they yield Flamesong 9/11 Essay and Links
TWO large “daughter elements” (e.g., Barium and Krypton, or Strontium Serendipity (various essays on 9/11)
and Xenon), plus 2-3 neutrons, plus energy in the form of gamma rays. But Stop the Lie 9/11
since 1959, it has been publicly known, via this article, that ternary The Strange Images of 9/11/2001
fission yields TRITIUM, along with its THREE daughter elements, plus the Total 9/11 Info
excess neutrons, and energy. And thus with the numerous fission bombs Unanswered Questions
that were detonated, and with the additional possible factors of redundancy Questions Questions
and fratriciding that my articles have detailed, we can arrive at The Web Fairy
perhaps the most likely source of tritium in the rubble-- the fission nukes Wing TV
themselves. I have seen estimates for the percentage of tritium production
from ternary fission ranging from 1% down to .005%. (There is the
9/11 Activism
possibility of deliberate disinformation, in some matters of nuclear physics, 9/11 Blogger
so one cannot often trust public nuclear physics discussions.) Because of 9/11 Citizens' Watch
this, and not knowing what element(s) were fissioned, nor how much of 9/11 Skeptics Unite!
each, it is impossible to know just how much tritium could have been 911 Truth.org
produced by ternary fission in the numerous micro-nukes used to destroy 911 Truth LA.us
the WTC. But it appears to be more than would occur from non-existent 911 Truth LA.org
planes, or gun sightings; and the proven heat generation of the China 911 Truth Emergence
Syndrome Aftermath belies the use of a mythical 4th generation pure 911 We Know
fusion device. 911 Truth Movement Musings
The most likely type of nuclear bombs used, was the type that could be 9-11 UK
made the smallest, and was the simplest, and most proven/dependable 9/11 Family Steering Committee
NY 9/11 Truth
(compared to the others). This was the “good old” pure fission form of

nuclear bombs. As I have shown, they’re even backpackable. And in
the final analysis-- given ternary fission-- there never was any basis for
claiming that the nuke(s) used at the WTC had to be 4th generation pure Summer of Truth
fusion, nor even that there was any fusion at all at the WTC. We may Proposition 911
never be able to prove exactly what happened regarding the nuclear Reopen 911
destruction of the WTC on 9/11, by the American regime; but we should Deception Dollars
strive to emphasize the most likely, and the most dependable factors the Justice for 9/11
American regime would have used. And we must realize that the regime
wanted to hide the China Syndrome Aftermath, as that poisoned thousands
of responders, and to a lesser extent, millions of metro NY residents. 9/11 Specialty Sites
Team 8 Plus
Flight 93 Hoax
So any tritium found on 9/13/01 at the WTC, was most likely from ternary
WTC Demolition
fission, not fusion. But if you want one more, perhaps crucial, plausibility
argument, here it is. Fusion bombs have a history of having a
9/11 Photo Analysis
yield larger than expected. And the perps strenuously wanted NOT Evidence of Explosives on 9/11
to blow through the building in an obvious nuclear manner. A nuke having Demolition, the Truth of 9/11 and the
a yield larger than needed could not be risked. This would have been WTC
visible to thousands, perhaps millions; and such knowledge would have 9/11 and the Impossible: the WTC
collapse
been difficult to contain. (Whereas radiation findings were controlled by
FEMA, and the Gestapo regime need only scream “national security” to Flight 77 FOIA site
prevent release of such data-- including the tritium paper, if it had wanted Flight 93 Crash.com
to.) I have emphasized the need not to blow through the building in an Pentagon Research
obvious nuclear way, since my very first article herein. This is one reason Brad's Pentagon Analysis
why some conventional explosives may have been used during the Where Is Osama (The Osama Clock)
destruction scenario, as I have also written.
What the nukes were mainly for, in my estimation, was to vaporize 9/11 Flash Movies
INSTANTLY, and definitively, the necessary core structure for the 9/11 chronology (network footage)
Buddy Buddy
TOWERS’ ENSUING RAPID, APPROXIMATE, FREEFALL RATE OF
Pentagon Strike
COLLAPSE! The PTB apparently intended to later push the impossible
911 Questions
“gravitational pancaking” ruse, even though it violates numerous laws of
Physics, and we can see the outer structure being exploded outward, by
the overpressure within. (You can compare what happens during an actual Reasonably reliable "Conspiracy Sites"
gravitational collapse by seeing this.) The PTB clearly wanted to shove a that question 9/11
physically impossible, evidence-opposing destruction "mechanism" down Rigorous Intuition
the throats of the masses. They know what it does to many peoples’ Wing TV
psyches. It induces denial, fear, schizoid behavior, and hopelessness-- all Xymphora
good for the coming endless wars, and destruction of the American Killtown's Blog
Constitution. Putting out a physically impossible and evidence-opposing The Bulldog Manifesto
“mechanism” for WTC destruction jibes with other events perpetrated by Center for an Informed America
the American regime. With the American regime’s assassination of the George Washington
Peace President, John Kennedy, the “official” scenario is that the fatal head
shot was fired from behind, even though Kennedy’s body is slammed
violently straight back--from the shot fired, from the front, by his Secret
Service “protector”/driver. The ludicrous shot from behind violates the Public Action (Carol Valentine)
simple Law of Conservation of Momentum. As I have written, the WTC Propaganda Matrix
bogus scenario entails “pristine pancaking”-- violating Newton’s Laws of Daniel Hopsicker
Motion. Similarly the JFK Assassination had (future) Senator Specter’s Cryptome
“pristine bullet” that smashed into 5 bones, made turns on its own, hung out Crimes and Corruptions of the New
for 2 seconds and looked virtually like new-- and violated the Momentum World Order News
Conservation Law. The PTB want to put out these impossible Covert 2 Overt Analysis
“mechanisms” to dumb down, shock, or paralyze the people. Most people
go into denial, and do not want to think about it, because their Good Intro Books to
subconciousnesses know what is really involved. Those who can think and Alternative 9/11 Truth
see, and have combatted the denial, are then further confounded with other
limited hangouts put out by the Gestapo Regime’s hidden intel agents Questions About the Bush
posing as “leaders” of the “truth movement.” These WTC hangouts Administration and 9/11" by David Ray
Griffin
included the evidence-free inanity of DEW, and the “thermite burns forever”
impossibility. Both are easily demonstrated to be physically impossible to Omissions And Distortions" by David
have caused the WTC destruction, and the CSA. All the regime’s hidden Ray Griffin
assets earlier inserted at the top of the “alternative” or conspiracy internet Ian Henshall
media, were then instructed to push these hangouts and avoid mention of "9/11 Synthetic Terror, Made in USA" by
the nuking and the China Syndrome Aftermath. Webster G. Tarpley
Thompson
Returning now to the fission vs. fusion issue. Blowing through the outer "Crossing the Rubicon" by Michael C.
structure of the building with unnecessary fusion--either as the hypothetical Ruppert
pure fusion, or as a fission-fusion bomb-- could not be risked, when pure "Welcome to Terrorland" by Daniel
Hopsicker
fission micro-nukes were readily available. Fission nukes have a more
"guaranteed" upper bound on their yields, and are more dependable as
well, compared to either the alleged pure fusion or the fission-fusion bomb. "Conspiracy Sites" that deal with 9/11
In the final analysis, the release of the tritium data may have been a clever that I have significant issues with
Intel Op to try to hide the China Syndrome Aftermath, and its nuclear What Really Happened
fission cause. If there was tritium at the WTC, its most likely source was From the Wilderness (Mike Ruppert)
ternary fission. Arctic Beacon

with 9/11
Break for News
Tom Flocco
<< Home

Buzzflash
The Raw Story
Think Progress
Common Dreams
Consortium News
Cursor
Guerrilla News
Online Journal
The Memory Hole
Press Action
News from Babylon
Unknown News
TV News Lies
Eschaton
Daily Kos
Talking Points Memo
Hullabaloo
Billmon
The Brad Blog
Jesus' General
The Rude Pundit
The Poor Man
Today in Iraq
Antiwar.com
Constant Pated
Clusterfuck Nation
Donkey Rising
Salon
Slate
My Other Blogs
Al-CIA-duh
Ghost Plane
Flight 93 Hoax


Peak Oil and

Oil and Gas
The Oil Drum
Land of Black Gold
Richard Heinberg
Grist

Conspiracy Theory!
World Trade Center Demolition: Exposing The “Red Mercury” Nuclear Scam, & Its Possible Use In Future Bogus Wars, & Other Crucial Matters O...

Tuesday, March 25, 2008 trade center buildings 1, 2
Exposing The “Red Mercury” Nuclear Scam, & Its demolition.
Possible Use In Future Bogus Wars, & Other Crucial
Matters On Nuclear 911, and About Mercury
About Me
by Anonymous Physicist Name: spooked
There is a great need to expose all the limited hangouts in the 911truth
field, and in the general conspiracy movement. After seeing recently that a The official 9/11 story is a lie. The 9/11 plane
scam exists in the nuclear field, I feel compelled to expose it. hijackings and crashes were clever hoaxes. The
Now there is much on the net on “pure fusion” nuclear “devices.” This down by demolition, and there is evidence for the
issue, as I have written, may be a red herring to distract from the nuclear use of small nuclear bombs in the demolition of
fissioning fragments of the China Syndrome, by the release of data by the WTC1 and 2. All in all, 9/11 was a massive and
govt indicating tritium was found at the WTC. Tritium, however, can be a cruel hoax foisted upon the world, done in order
booster for fission reactions, and need not indicate “pure fusion.” to spark the obscene "war on terror", to cover up
Nonetheless, pure fusion devices have been discussed, and will be here. financial fraud and to further the ends of the
Now the PTB have certainly had enough decades to produce pure fusion, global elite. 9/11 was only the most egregious of
so I am not opposed to their existence, but it seems that the intel assets several other recent false-flag terror operations.
have been busy with hangouts explaining how this might be accomplished.
Theoretically, pure fusion, for a large scale bomb, is a difficult thing to
accomplish, because you need three things 1. Tremendous, rapid energy
input — other than a fission trigger -- to overcome the forces keeping the More 9/11 Links (Note: I present a wide
nuclei away from each other, 2. Proper spatial configuration, 3. Proper variety of 9/11 sites here for the
temporal “technique.” The last two are needed so as to control the reaction purposes of diversity. I leave it up to
to maximize a uniform and rapid method of detonation/fusion you to judge their content.)
commencement. Note: Cold fusion is supposedly “pure fusion,” but appears
to be unusable for bomb use. Cold fusion appears to be a slow process
with insufficient yield for bomb use. But we should never forget the intel General 9/11 Sites
9/11 Blimp
asset sent in to destroy cold fusion at its birth,
9/11 Busters
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N1vOeKNN2UI.
9/11 CGI Watch
One hangout put out-- as a non-fission trigger for attaining nuclear fusion in 9/11 Complicity
a bomb-- is the “red mercury” scam. As usual, the intel agents accomplish 9/11 Cover-Up
several things at once with this scam. The “father” of the “red mercury” 9/11 Dossier (UK)
scam is none other than the “father” of the neutron bomb, Samuel Cohen,
9/11 Encyclopedia
PhD. Now a neutron bomb is described variously as a fission-triggered
fusion bomb: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutron_bomb, or 9/11 Foreknowledge
alternatively as a fusion-boosted, fission bomb: 9/11 Hoax
http://everything2.com/title/neutron%2520bomb. As an aside, 9/11 Oddities
note how the wiki article states that President Kennedy— whom I called the
9/11 Overview
Peacegiver-- and President Carter, halted production of the neutron bomb.
I have also seen the neutron bomb described as a “pure fusion” bomb 9/11 Plot
as well, by the Anonymous Finnish Military Expert. 9/11 Proof
Thus we have three very different descriptions of what a neutron bomb is!? 9/11 Resources
But “red mercury” or anti-matter were described as triggers for the alleged 9/11 Review.org
pure fusion, in the last description; and with respect, I want to show that 9/11 Review.com
http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2008/03/exposing-red-mercury-nuclear-scam-its.html[07.11.2010 15:01:51]
these are unlikely, or impossible. So it is questionable/doubtful that neutron 9/11 Stealth

bombs are “pure fusion” bombs though there are other methods that may 9/11 Strike
be used to achieve fusion without a fission trigger— including lasers and 9/11 True Story
sound wave energy. So the Powers That Be (PTB) may well have non- 9/11 "U"
fission-triggered fusion bombs— but their hypothetical existence may have 9/11 Verses
been used as a red herring to divert from the China Syndrome aftermath at Awoken Research Group
the WTC— which arose from fissioning bomb components, as pure fusion Thompson)
in theory can not give rise to a China Syndrome of indefinitely heat Finnish 9/11 Site
releasing radioisotopes. And the “red mercury” scam may have been put Finnish 9/11 Site in English
out to set up 911 nuclear researchers/proponents. Gallerize
German Engineers 9/11 site
Now the main article on the red mercury scam was written by Sam Cohen Hybrideb's 9/11 site
and Joe Douglass, titled, “The Nuclear Threat That Doesn't Exist Icelandic 9/11 site
- Or Does It?” Jane Doe's 9/11 site
Let us now examine “red mercury,” and these two authors putting out this Killtown
hangout. It was immediately clear to me that this alleged “red mercury” (if it
exists at all) could not trigger fusion, for a bomb. Red mercury is allegedly
a mercury antimony oxide compound that is either red, or claimed to have
Let's Roll 9/11
been made in the USSR— hence the red or Communist aspect. Red Morgan Reynolds WTC Demolition
mercury is also said to be a “ballotechnic” compound with “special Essay
properties.” Now the Physics of this matter is that any chemical compound, Morgan Reynolds 9/11 Commission
Essay
including a “ballotechnical” one, is a million times too weak to initiate fusion
reactions. One physicist already had an article demonstrating
Nerdcities 9/11
this. Red mercury is said to be enhanced only via radiation from a nuclear Operation 9/11
reactor-- thus providing an excuse to deny ownership of nuclear reactors to Planet Quo 9/11
certain countries— and an excuse for warring with any country that has, or Rick Siegel (9/11 Eyewitness)
wants one! (Personally I wish all countries did not have nuclear reactors for RINF 9/11 Archive
environmental, and other, reasons. Creating the deadly radioactive wastes Terrorize (Danish 911 site)
that last up to billions of years is an abomination, especially when so many The Mysteries of 9/11
other energy sources abound.) So claims of red mercury are an excuse for THE TRUTH ABOUT SEPT 11 (Compiled
by Gerard Holmgren)
conflict and war. And indeed people have been arrested for falling for the
Shunned
scheme, and allegedly trying to buy/obtain red mercury— even though no
Physics 911
person anywhere has ever proven either 1. it even exists and/or 2. it can
Physics 9/11.co.nr
be a trigger for fusion! Plague Puppy's Cafe
Let us now examine these two authors, Cohen and Douglass, and the Question 911
heart of this intel op/hangout. Cohen, wiki demonstrates, has a horrific Truth 911
record as a cold warrior/warmonger/”red” baiter. He called for Brad's 911 site
the USA to nuke Vietnam, with his beloved neutron bombs, during that war Club Ivy's 911 site
of American aggression. (The so-called Gulf Of Tonkin incident never Brad's old 9/11 site
occurred. Just as the American regime, with its perennial wars of Flamesong 9/11 Essay and Links
aggression, is today perpetrating war on Iraq and Afghanistan, for bogus Serendipity (various essays on 9/11)
reasons.) Cohen, in 1979, also gets the “Peace Medal” for creating the Stop the Lie 9/11
neutron bomb, from Pope John Paul II. So we see that the so-called Prince The Strange Images of 9/11/2001
of Peace hands out a “peace medal” to the creator of a bomb that only kills Total 9/11 Info
people, and does not appreciably damage property!? Another indication of
Questions Questions
how London and Rome control mankind, as I have written here numerous
The Web Fairy
times. Cohen has also been ranting more recently on the alleged North
Wing TV
Korean nuclear bomb. Note the initial reports of the alleged N. Korean
nuclear detonation of 2006, were that it fizzled-- sound familiar?-- and had
a very tiny yield, and/or may well not have been a nuke. See, e.g. 9/11 Activism
http://www.defensetech.org/archives/002832.html. But that 9/11 Blogger
won’t stop Sam Cohen, or his handlers, from ranting on N. Korea’s alleged 9/11 Citizens' Watch
nukes. The PTB want excuses for perennial wars. 9/11 Skeptics Unite!
911 Truth.org
This brings us to Joseph Douglass, Jr., PhD. He has been a government 911 Truth LA.us
“national security analyst.” I have not been able to find where Douglass 911 Truth LA.org
911 Truth Emergence
worked for the govt. Sometimes this means the NSA, as officially, there is
911 We Know
“No Such Agency.” Now the red mercury article by Douglass and Cohen
was also used as an excuse for war on Iraq, claiming Saddam Hussein (a
CIA asset all his adult life) had obtained/was trying to obtain red mercury 9-11 UK
and nukes, and was going to use them on America, or its allies. Much of 9/11 Family Steering Committee
Douglass’ career has also been as a “red baiter.” His earlier book was NY 9/11 Truth
called “Red Cocaine.” Laughably, it purported to demonstrate that the

American cocaine epidemic was a red/Commie/USSR and Red China op, Scholars for 9/11 Truth
when any honest researcher knows that the American regime itself brings Community Currency 9/11
in, and controls, the drug trade. So Douglass went from his “red” cocaine to Summer of Truth
“red” mercury. Clearly these two men are intel assets whose life-long M.O. Proposition 911
is to blame everything that the American regime, and its masters in London Reopen 911
and Rome, and beyond, do on reds/Commies. Deception Dollars
Justice for 9/11
“Red mercury” appears to be nothing other than a scam; and these two
“authors” are scam artists, intel assets, and warmongers. These two are 9/11 Specialty Sites
analogous to other intel agents who try to claim all evil, and all nefarious Team 8 Plus
events, come from “Zionists.” These monsters are easy to spot, because of Flight 93 Hoax
their “broken record” method/orders to keep putting out the very same WTC Demolition
ludicrous hangout. Again, this is much like the intel assets for the O.C.T., The Ultimate Hijacker Compilation
and “DEW” hangouts, who likely have the same intel controllers, as they 9/11 Photo Analysis
continue to lie and claim that during and after WTC demolition, “there was Evidence of Explosives on 9/11
no heat, no loud sounds, no explosions, no ground shaking,” etc. This Demolition, the Truth of 9/11 and the
WTC
despite my proving these to be lies, numerous times, including here with
the sworn statements of the responders: collapse
http://covertoperations.blogspot.com/2007/11/eyewitness- WTC Streaking Object, WTC7 theories
testimony-of-firefighters.html Flight 77 FOIA site
Flight 93 Crash.com
Similarly, we are not likely to see the “red mercury” hangout disappear, as Pentagon Research
the PTB, and their intel lackeys, apparently think it is a good scheme for Brad's Pentagon Analysis
red baiting/warmongering/setting up “terrorists” for arrest, even though the Where Is Osama (The Osama Clock)
thing they might allegedly try to obtain doesn’t even exist. A good way of
throwing away the key on someone that was set-up, perhaps because he 9/11 Flash Movies
knows too much truth? The bogus red mercury scam may soon be used to 9/11 chronology (network footage)
set someone up from Iran, and claim that he was trying to obtain, or Buddy Buddy
create, a nuclear fusion bomb for Iran. Thus providing an excuse for the Pentagon Strike
American regime to start War on Iran. Indeed, the “red mercury” scam even 911 Questions
allows the PTB to resurrect the old red/Commie scare if and when it wants
to! But just as I have indicated that “Hitler was a British agent”
(see http://www.hitlerwasabritishagent.com/), the old USSR/Red Reasonably reliable "Conspiracy Sites"
Menace was itself also controlled out of London! Indeed this book, just that question 9/11
cited, referenced Stalin being trained/tortured/controlled out of London’s Rigorous Intuition
Wing TV
Tavistock “Institute,” just a few years before Hitler was there, getting the
Xymphora
same “treatment.” So the “red” menace, and “red” mercury will not go
Killtown's Blog
away, even though they are indications of far deeper matters.
Now anti-matter has also been proposed as a possible triggering source George Washington
for a “pure fusion,” or fission-less, bomb. I am sure it’s only a matter of time Centre for Research on Globalization
before the PTB create a Matter/Anti-Matter bomb. This may have already Prison Planet (Alex Jones)
occurred. This would be bad news for humanity, as this type of “device” Daily Two Minutes of Hate
would have approx. 1000x the energy yield of fission or fusion— it could be The Emperor's New Clothes
a country-destroying, or world-destroying weapon, and may never be Public Action (Carol Valentine)
announced, as its intention would be clear! (See http://anonymous- Propaganda Matrix
physicist.blogspot.com/2007/06/ultimate-truth.html) Daniel Hopsicker
Its great energy arises because 100% of the mass (via E=mc2) of the Cryptome
matter and anti-matter nuclei, in a reaction between them, becomes energy Crimes and Corruptions of the New
World Order News
(presumably gamma rays). While in fission or fusion, smaller and larger Covert 2 Overt Analysis
nuclei are created, respectively, and only less than 1% of the mass of the
starting nuclei is converted to energy. A matter/anti-matter bomb does not
have the first of the three concerns listed above to make a nuclear bomb— Good Intro Books to
no large repulsive force need be overcome. But instead, it is vastly more Alternative 9/11 Truth
difficult to manage the other two factors— spatial and temporal techniques "The New Pearl Harbor, Disturbing
to shield the anti-matter from matter so as to allow a rapid, uniform Questions About the Bush
reaction. Now there are two concerns regarding the possible use of anti- Griffin
matter as a trigger for fusion. 1. It appears extremely difficult to create "The 9/11 Commission Report:
conditions meeting the two necessary criteria, and 2. If it were possible to Omissions And Distortions" by David
Ray Griffin
use anti-matter as a trigger for fusion, why would you want to? Because if 9/11 Revealed by Rowland Morgan and
you could control anti-matter to this extent, you would then use it for a pure Ian Henshall
matter/anti-matter bomb, which would have approx. 1000x the yield, "9/11 Synthetic Terror, Made in USA" by
Webster G. Tarpley
compared to using it to “merely” trigger fusion. So to sum up, “red mercury”
as a fusion trigger is impossible, and may not even exist; and the use of Thompson
anti-matter as a fusion trigger appears to be improbable or implausible. "Crossing the Rubicon" by Michael C.
Ruppert
So we have seen that red mercury is a scam put out by obvious, Hopsicker
warmongering intel assets. And a pure matter/anti-matter bomb with its
immense yield, which is neutron-free, would also not give rise to the
observed China Syndrome of high heat released for months afterwards at "Conspiracy Sites" that deal with 9/11
the WTC. As I have reported, much eyewitness and material proof of that I have significant issues with
neutron bombardment took place, thus it appears unlikely that a pure What Really Happened
matter/anti-matter bomb was used, as this would not release neutrons, to From the Wilderness (Mike Ruppert)
Arctic Beacon
my knowledge.
Finally, in addition to deciphering what the evidence indicated happened Unreliable "Conspiracy Sites" that deal
on 9/11, and its aftermath, I feel compelled to warn what the abundance of with 9/11
intel assets in the 911 community and the larger community will try to pull Break for News
on 911 nuclear truth advocates. It is crucial to try to predict future ops Tom Flocco
against the 911 nuclear truth community. I saw recently from the website of
nuclear 911 advocate Bill Deagle, M.D. that he stated the following. He
had tried to get his WTC sample analyzed. His page states, “After Democratic/Progressive News Sites,
Dr. Deagle MD’s request, Dr. Durakovic's family and Dr. Yamamoto PhD in Blogs and Miscellaneous Links
Japan received death threats for even attempting to perform gamma Buzzflash
The Raw Story
spectroscopy with germanium detectors & neutron activation studies that
require the presence of a neutron source from a nuclear reactor. Testing
will proceed despite death threats!”
Think Progress
As an expert on the wider conspiracy, and one of the few who was nearly Common Dreams
killed myself-- via mercury poisoning of my home, and thus myself-- and Consortium News
one of the few current conspiracy experts who isn’t himself an intel “asset”, Center for Cooperative Research
I will give you two examples of how the PTB can interfere. First, in the late Cursor
1970’s, Marita Lorenz handed in documents to the House of Guerrilla News
Representatives Committee on Assassinations containing direct proof and Online Journal
evidence of CIA involvement in killing President Kennedy, including the The Memory Hole
involvement of E. Howard Hunt, Frank Sturgis and others— she had been Information Clearing House
dragged along with them unknowingly beforehand. The Committee then Press Action
took a break. (Months earlier, the original Committee Chairman Henry News from Babylon
Gonzalez-- a friend/supporter of President Kennedy-- and its first attorney, Unknown News
TV News Lies
were both railroaded off the Committee, and CIA stooges had replaced
them.) After the break, when Ms. Lorenz referred to the proof/evidence she
Eschaton
had just given the Committee, she was told, “What proof, what
Daily Kos
documentation, what evidence?” It was gone. So much for a Congress, Talking Points Memo
and for Justice in America. Hullabaloo
Billmon
So they could have already broken into Deagle’s place where the sample is, The Brad Blog
and replaced it. They certainly broke into my home numerous times without Jesus' General
my knowing it, until later for my revealing that Secret Service Agent William The Rude Pundit
Greer had not only killed President Kennedy, as Bill Cooper had shown, The Poor Man
but analysis I showed-- an audio and video version of he Zapruder film-- Juan Cole (Informed Comment)
proved Greer fired twice, first hitting Connolly as well. My murderers placed Today in Iraq
a mercury compound all over my home, that gassed and poisoned me for Antiwar.com
two years, and destroyed my health, and my life. The federal Iraq Coalition Casualties
agents/perpetrators even removed a sample that had the mercury in it from Constant Pated
Clusterfuck Nation
my home that had undergone analysis by a state lab, and was going to be
Donkey Rising
evidence. This time they brazenly removed this evidence from my home,
Salon
when I said on the phone I was going to have it all investigated. So I never
Slate
did. After all, who am I going to call for help, when the agencies that
should be protecting us, were the ones killing me and interfering with due
process. Indeed, they had removed the evidence, which they knew about My Other Blogs
from tapping my phone calls to police, to the EPA, and to other agencies Humint Events Online
that wanted to help but were called off, by the Gestapo intel agencies THE WORST PRESIDENT EVER!!!!
intercepting my calls. So this was my second example— myself. My being Bush Administration War Criminals
massively poisoned, brutally assaulted, car chased, wire-tapped, all for Fake Opposition Democrats
once publicly showing in 1992, an audio as well as video version of the Al-CIA-duh
Zapruder film. Ghost Plane
Flight 93 Hoax
So I just wish to caution the 911 nuclear truth community about this matter
of getting some supposed WTC steel analyzed by some nuclear lab, as it is
so easy to have a set-up. E.g., all it takes is someone at some lab to not
reveal such death threats, and pretend to do a scientific analysis say on a
different sample surreptitiously given to them by the regime, and report
negative nuclear results. Such a bogus “analysis,” unless it were exposed—
which would be difficult under the circumstances— would then appear to
cause great harm to the 911 nuclear truth community. The point is the PTB
will never allow release of direct proof of their nuking the WTC on 9/11,
and will resort to any means to prevent such direct proof from being
released to the public. And it is very easy to get set-up, in many different
ways. They could have already switched the samples. Hint to Bill Deagle:
Cuba might, I say might, be the only country not totally controlled by the
PTB now, if you actually have a real sample at this point. To the rest of the
911 truth community, I warn you of this turning out to be a set-up against
the nuclear truth of 911. This is unfortunately an easy thing to do, via
complete interception of all communications by the Gestapo agencies, and
the switching or alteration of any samples, possibly even before first
handed in. Be wary, be wise, be well.
<< Home


Peak Oil and

Oil and Gas
The Oil Drum
Land of Black Gold
Richard Heinberg
Grist

Conspiracy Theory!
World Trade Center Demolition: Breakthroughs Towards Attaining A Complete Understanding of the Nuking of the WTC on 9/11, and its China S...

Tuesday, March 25, 2008 trade center buildings 1, 2
Breakthroughs Towards Attaining A Complete demolition.
Understanding of the Nuking of the WTC on 9/11,
and its China Syndrome Aftermath: Part II
About Me
This is part of my continuing efforts to decipher, and expose, the details of
the American regime’s nuking of the WTC on 9/11/01, and the China The official 9/11 story is a lie. The 9/11 plane
Syndrome aftermath of high heat emitting, radioactive/fissioning fragments hijackings and crashes were clever hoaxes. The
at, and under, the WTC. As I have detailed herein (see the archived URL’s WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7 towers were brought
noted at the bottom), the China Syndrome documentation includes massive down by demolition, and there is evidence for the
evidence of high temperatures, melted boots, flowing molten metal, and use of small nuclear bombs in the demolition of
much more. Inherent in this, was the perpetrators’ crucial need to keep the WTC1 and 2. All in all, 9/11 was a massive and
nuking of the WTC, and the China Syndrome aftermath, hidden from cruel hoax foisted upon the world, done in order
Americans (and the world.) to spark the obscene "war on terror", to cover up
Now any nuke that might be significantly larger than expected, and thus global elite. 9/11 was only the most egregious of
might blow through a building, and be videotaped, had to be prevented, as several other recent false-flag terror operations.
the nuclear op would be clear to all. Now you might think that if a larger
nuke than expected became visible, the regime would just say that Osama
bin Laden (aka Tim Osman of the CIA) had obtained nukes after all. But
they couldn’t, because they had already put out the (CGI) “plane hits”, and More 9/11 Links (Note: I present a wide
it is not plausible that anyone would go to all the trouble of hijacking planes, variety of 9/11 sites here for the
and “flying them into the towers”, if they had already planted nukes therein! purposes of diversity. I leave it up to
The perps would lose their coveted “plausible deniability.” So it was crucial you to judge their content.)
to use nukes that might be underpowered, or even fizzle (as this could be
[and was] corrected later); and not to use nukes that might have a larger
yield than predicted. And better to have many smaller ones— redundancy General 9/11 Sites
9/11 Blimp
— which could be corrected as needed— as was WTC7. I have stated that
9/11 Busters
the bogus “towers are leaning,” said on the air by the regime’s intel
9/11 CGI Watch
operators/”reporters” was related to the fall-back position of using larger
nukes in the sub-basement of the towers— which would not be visible-- to 9/11 Complicity
knock the towers over, if the intricate top to bottom scenario, with many 9/11 Cover-Up
smaller nukes, fizzled completely. 9/11 Dossier (UK)
9/11 Encyclopedia
In more detail, uncertainty in the lower boundary of destructive nuclear
yield, was far more tolerable, than uncertainty was, in the upper boundary 9/11 Foreknowledge
of yield. The former is OK, as even fizzling (insufficient yield) could be, and 9/11 Hoax
was, “corrected” later— a la WTC7. 9/11 Oddities
http://covertoperations.blogspot.com/2007/09/breakthroughs-
9/11 Overview
toward-attaining-complete.html
9/11 Plot
How might this relate to the fission vs. fusion issue? Perhaps either fusion 9/11 Proof
bombs cannot be made with very low yield-- or perhaps more likely-- a very 9/11 Research (Jim Hoffman)
low yield cannot be guaranteed for fusion devices, as well as it can be for 9/11 Resources
fission devices. Note the Castle Bravo H-Bomb test of March 1, 1954, 9/11 Review.org
where “The 15 megaton [thermonuclear] bomb delivered a 9/11 Review.com
http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2008/03/breakthroughs-towards-attaining.html[07.11.2010 15:03:21]
force far more powerful than expected”. This leads me to the 9/11 Stealth
“official” tritium finding— and release-- from the USGS (aka the 9/11 Strike
UCal/Berkeley/Livermore) study. See also William Tahil’s 9/11 True Story
analysis of this, and his perhaps, crucial findings and 9/11 "U"
analysis of levels found of Strontium, Barium, and other 9/11 Verses
elements, of the fissioning of Uranium or Plutonium. Awoken Research Group
Thompson)
Now regarding the tritium, there are three possibilities: Finnish 9/11 Site
1. Tritium was used as a booster in fission nukes at the WTC, and/or Finnish 9/11 Site in English
2. Tritium was used in fusion nukes at the WTC, or Gallerize
3. The Tritium finding is bogus, a straw man. German Engineers 9/11 site
Now you might ask why would the federal regime release data that might Icelandic 9/11 site
indicate the use of a fusion device at the WTC? Precisely because of the Jane Doe's 9/11 site
existence of the China Syndrome aftermath! And stating there was tritium Juscogen's 9/11 site
could be a straw man, in the sense that 911 researchers would be diverted Killtown
into believing that fusion (only) devices were used— including the so-
called, hypothetical “pure fusion” nukes, and therefore there could be no
China Syndrome aftermath, as that requires fissioning fragments. (At the
Let's Roll 9/11
same time, of course, different intel assets would claim that the tritium Morgan Reynolds WTC Demolition
finding doesn’t mean anything.) So the pure fusion debate could be a red Essay
herring. Recall earlier, I have written that whenever the federal regime Morgan Reynolds 9/11 Commission
Essay
releases something that seems very damaging, it will likely turn out that the
truth is far worse, and is being hidden. The bottom line is that the federal
Nerdcities 9/11
regime could have easily prevented the release of the tritium finding, if it Operation 9/11
were genuine. All they had to do is to claim the usual “national security” Planet Quo 9/11
excuse to censor anything. Recall I have asserted, and demonstrated, that Rick Siegel (9/11 Eyewitness)
the 2nd AVIRIS WTC ground temperature data is false, as well as the RINF 9/11 Archive
seismic records. Anything that indicated the China Syndrome has been Terrorize (Danish 911 site)
particularly censored. The Mysteries of 9/11
by Gerard Holmgren)
Anything and everything coming from the federal regime must never be
Shunned
taken on face value. Indeed, statistically, one would be better off assuming
Physics 911
any statement, assertion, or data regarding any very important issue, is a
Physics 9/11.co.nr
lie. The regime knew from the outset that the China Syndrome had begun. Plague Puppy's Cafe
This was either from knowing this as WTC destruction happened, or from its Plague Puppy: Alternate Site
intel assets on the ground, or from satellites or planes high overhead— Question 911
assaying heat or radiation spectra. The feds then informed their Truth 911
stooge/mayor, Giuliani, who immediately ordered the trucking in and out of Brad's 911 site
sand/earth, and hosing down of the grounds, to lower the radiation levels. Club Ivy's 911 site
I find it fascinating that one of the proponents of the nuclear WTC Flamesong 9/11 Essay and Links
hypothesis repeatedly cites the tritium finding, but has never once written Serendipity (various essays on 9/11)
the words, “China Syndrome.” We must also be aware of how the regime Stop the Lie 9/11
easily keeps these words from being mentioned in the MSM, and had its The Strange Images of 9/11/2001
assets waiting in the wings with their hangouts to hide this. I refer again to Total 9/11 Info
the thermite and “DEW” hangouts. The thermite physicist ludicrously claims
Questions Questions
that thermite would maintain molten metal temperatures for months. While
The Web Fairy
the DEW engineer claims that each time the firemen/responders hosed
Wing TV
down the very hot rubble pile, and steam (photographed) and hissing
sounds were emitted, that instead “cold molecular dissociation clouds”
appeared, or the latest “New Physics” gibberish (it will never end: the sign 9/11 Activism
of an intel op)-- the “Hutchison effect.” 9/11 Blogger
So in trying to obtain a complete understanding of the nuking of the WTC 9/11 Skeptics Unite!
on 9/11, and the China Syndrome aftermath, I can state the following. 911 Truth.org
There is a good probability that numerous low yield (mini- or micro-nuclear) 911 Truth LA.us
fission bombs were used. There is the possibility that the tritium “finding”, 911 Truth LA.org
911 Truth Emergence
that was released by the govt, may be a straw man to lead researchers to
911 We Know
the red herring of “pure fusion”, and away from the evidence of the China
Syndrome. In all likelihood, the regime has kept proof of radiation release
at the WTC during demolition, and the later China Syndrome from public 9-11 UK
release. The ludicrous hangouts of thermite and DEW were created to hide 9/11 Family Steering Committee
the China Syndrome, and the nuking. NY 9/11 Truth

Some of the people of New York City have learned well the nature of their Scholars for 9/11 Truth
regime, and have bought Geiger counters (which are of limited use). The Community Currency 9/11
regime knows this, and is trying to ban the possession of Geiger Summer of Truth
Counters by the citizenry. So the citizens are trying to determine Proposition 911
directly for themselves if they will be hit with any more nukings of their city. Reopen 911
What possible reason would the regime have for denying them this right— Deception Dollars
other than the obvious, nefarious one? The current NYC stooge/mayor Justice for 9/11
Bloomberg’s own Police “counter-terrorism deputy commissioner,” R.A.
Falkenrath, makes it clear with his own words from the last URL. The 9/11 Specialty Sites
restriction is so that “we know where these detectors are located…” Team 8 Plus
Translation: They want to make sure that there will be no WORKING Flight 93 Hoax
Geiger detectors nearby at the time the regime does its next nuking of WTC Demolition
NYC. Those of you who understand all that I have written here, will realize The Ultimate Hijacker Compilation
that “counter-terrorism experts” like former “reporter” John Miller that I 9/11 Photo Analysis
exposed herein, are likely long term deep undercover intel “assets.” They Evidence of Explosives on 9/11
are the terrorists themselves, and/or working directly for the regime’s Demolition, the Truth of 9/11 and the
WTC
terrorists who have done, and will do, the next nuking— or other use of a
WMD against the citizenry. collapse
But the people are obviously catching on. And I hope with my articles Flight 77 FOIA site
herein, that we can see more and more clearly exactly what they did on Flight 93 Crash.com
9/11, and its aftermath. Please post this and my archived articles on the Pentagon Research
nuking of the WTC, and the China Syndrome aftermath at Brad's Pentagon Analysis
wtcdemolition.blogspot.com and wtc-chinasyndrome.blogspot.com at all Where Is Osama (The Osama Clock)
forums and blogs. And tell your friends and neighbors. The life you save
may be your own. While this mass murdering, terrorist regime may desire 9/11 Flash Movies
to ban Geiger counters, and guns, the people have learned that the way to 9/11 chronology (network footage)
counter this is for everyone to get them now, and never give them up. Buddy Buddy
Pentagon Strike
posted by spooked @ 7:19 AM 911 Questions

that question 9/11
<< Home Rigorous Intuition
Wing TV
Xymphora
Killtown's Blog
George Washington
Propaganda Matrix
Daniel Hopsicker
Cryptome
World Order News
Good Intro Books to

Griffin
Ray Griffin
Ian Henshall
Webster G. Tarpley
Thompson

Ruppert
Hopsicker

Arctic Beacon

with 9/11
Break for News
Tom Flocco

Buzzflash
The Raw Story
Think Progress
Common Dreams
Consortium News
Cursor
Guerrilla News
Online Journal
The Memory Hole
Press Action
News from Babylon
Unknown News
TV News Lies
Eschaton
Daily Kos
Talking Points Memo
Hullabaloo
Billmon
The Brad Blog
Jesus' General
The Rude Pundit
The Poor Man
Today in Iraq
Antiwar.com
Constant Pated
Clusterfuck Nation
Donkey Rising
Salon
Slate
My Other Blogs
Al-CIA-duh
Ghost Plane
Flight 93 Hoax


Peak Oil and

Oil and Gas
The Oil Drum
Land of Black Gold
Richard Heinberg
Grist

Conspiracy Theory!
World Trade Center Demolition: On The Existence of Mini- or Micro-Nukes, Fizzled Nukes, 9/11 & The China Syndrome

Wednesday, March 19, 2008 trade center buildings 1, 2
On The Existence of Mini- or Micro-Nukes, Fizzled demolition.
Nukes, 9/11 & The China Syndrome

Name: spooked
This author, among a few others, has claimed that numerous mini- or
micro-nukes were used to destroy the WTC. There may appear to be a
conflict between the “official” listing of minimal critical masses for small The official 9/11 story is a lie. The 9/11 plane
nuclear fission bombs, and the claims of very small yield for such nuclear hijackings and crashes were clever hoaxes. The
devices. Now we have sources, like this Wiki article state that about WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7 towers were brought
10 kg. (kilogram) for Plutonium, and 15-50 Kg for Uranium are their down by demolition, and there is evidence for the
minimal critical masses. I have seen other sources put 2 Kg for the minimal use of small nuclear bombs in the demolition of
critical mass for Plutonium. At the same time, we have a gov’t physicist at WTC1 and 2. All in all, 9/11 was a massive and
a Congressional hearing, in 1998, who said, “These experiments cruel hoax foisted upon the world, done in order
involve the actual testing of extremely low yield fission to spark the obscene "war on terror", to cover up
devices (as low as the equivalent of several pounds of TNT) financial fraud and to further the ends of the
within a confined environment.” Such a very small fission yield global elite. 9/11 was only the most egregious of
directly implies a critical mass far below that claimed to be the minimal several other recent false-flag terror operations.
critical mass for any fission device; thus there appears to be a conflict.
How can it be resolved? View my complete profile
Obviously one or the other side may be lying. The official listings and
equations for finding the smallest critical mass for a given radionuclide can More 9/11 Links (Note: I present a wide
have been made much larger than they really are—ostensibly to deter variety of 9/11 sites here for the
nuclear proliferation among “newcomers.” Or the physicist testifying to purposes of diversity. I leave it up to
Congress could have lied to scare people. Although the Congress did pass you to judge their content.)
legislation barring the production of such extremely small yield nukes.
Needless legislation was passed, if this were impossible; but this doesn’t General 9/11 Sites
prove anything, due to the nature of Congress. 9/11 Blimp
9/11 Busters
Now regarding mini-nukes, as far back as the 1950’s, the USA had the
9/11 CGI Watch
Davy Crockett mini-nuke (fission). It was called a recoilless rifle with a 9/11 Closeup (Gerard Holmgren)
range of 2-4 km. It’s yield was down to 10 tons of TNT. This is 0.01 Kt 9/11 Complicity
(kilotons), or about 1/1000 of the Hiroshima blast. Thus it can be called a 9/11 Cover-Up
mini-nuke. Note that this low yield appears to be from less than the 9/11 Dossier (UK)
“official” minimal critical mass claimed. One would think that with an
9/11 Encyclopedia
additional 45 years before 2001, and with the advent of technological
breakthroughs, such as nanotechnology--which the military would have had 9/11 Foreknowledge
decades before civilian use--ultra-small nukes would be obtainable, unless 9/11 Hoax
truly forbidden by the Laws of Physics. 9/11 Oddities
The Wiki article admits, at one point, that “critical mass depends inversely 9/11 Overview
on the square of the density.” And there are greater explosives now to
9/11 Plot
implode the material to a greater density, than they did in 1945. As the
9/11 Proof
critical mass equation has the density inversely squared, this could provide
for a great shrinkage of the minimal critical mass. There are other relevant 9/11 Resources
things in the wiki article on critical mass. There is the “fudge factor, f”. And 9/11 Review.org
they admit that “sophisticated nuclear weapons programs can make a 9/11 Review.com
functional device from less material than more primitive weapons programs
http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2008/03/on-existence-of-mini-or-micro-nukes.html[07.11.2010 15:04:20]
9/11 Stealth
require.” But wiki, which has been called a CIA front, does list the minimal 9/11 Strike
critical masses I cited above. 9/11 True Story
9/11 "U"
Can these opposing views be reconciled? How could a micro-nuke be 9/11 Verses
made? At first thought, one might conclude that one would indeed use Awoken Research Group
nanotechnology to emplace Uranium or Plutonium atoms one at a time Complete 9/11 Timeline (Paul
optimally, to obtain as small, and compact, a nuke as possible— and this Thompson)
Finnish 9/11 Site
may be feasible. But then I realized this may be approaching the problem
from the wrong direction. Instead of trying to see how that physicist at the
Gallerize
Congressional hearing could build a fission bomb, with a yield of only a few
pounds of TNT, from a very tiny amount of Uranium or Plutonium, I may Hybrideb's 9/11 site
have found better ways. Icelandic 9/11 site
Now we know, e.g., that the Hiroshima bomb had 80 generations of
neutron capture/emission. One neutron yielding 2-3 neutrons with each Killtown
successful capture by a Uranium nucleus, and so on. 99% of the 13-15 Kt Oil and Empire 9/11 (Mark Robinowitz)
of TNT release is said to have occurred in the last 10 generations of Portland Indy Media 9/11
neutron emission. That is because of the exponential build-up to the 119 Questions about 9/11
massive numbers of neutrons at the end. So instead of thinking very tiny, Let's Roll 9/11
what is to stop the following? Start with an Hiroshima bomb, or the smaller Morgan Reynolds WTC Demolition
Davy Crockett nuke. Then stop the last few generations of neutron Essay
emission/capture to have either of these bombs have a much lower yield. Essay
This can probably be attained in numerous ways. 1. A somewhat hollow Missile Gate (analysis of 1st hit)
core or 2. Emplacing one or more spherical shells (or whatever geometry is Nerdcities 9/11
required) of a neutron absorbing material, at the appropriate radii, to either Operation 9/11
terminate criticality near the end (or earlier for a very small yield), or go Planet Quo 9/11
barely critical (as opposed to the initial super-criticality), or possibly sub- Rick Siegel (9/11 Eyewitness)
critical somewhere in between to halt, or slow, the reaction. 3. Employ RINF 9/11 Archive
ACTIVE nanotech devices to halt a critical reaction, even after it has Terrorize (Danish 911 site)
begun. The Mysteries of 9/11
by Gerard Holmgren)
The first method is somewhat obvious, so let’s examine the second and
Shunned
third methods. Regarding neutron absorbing shells, we know that the
Physics 911
properties of neutron absorbing materials are well known from the nuclear Physics 9/11.co.nr
reactor industry. In fact, such a tiny nuclear bomb is almost in between a Plague Puppy's Cafe
nuke and a nuclear reactor. I think this is very attainable. Now for the third Plague Puppy: Alternate Site
method. As the time scale between each of the 80 generations of neutron Question 911
capture/emission is said to be 10 nanoseconds, and nanotechnology Truth 911
operates at nanometer distances, it is thus possible that active, not merely Brad's 911 site
passive, means could be employed to act on this related time scale. Thus it Club Ivy's 911 site
may be possible to build in active methods to curtail, or halt, a chain Brad's old 9/11 site
reaction, even after it has begun. As they have nano-engines, they could Flamesong 9/11 Essay and Links
have nano-lasers that could “de-implode” the critical mass, even after it Serendipity (various essays on 9/11)
has begun! Thus no laws of physics would be violated. So it appears likely Stop the Lie 9/11
that there may be numerous ways to attain micro-nukes-- including with the The Strange Images of 9/11/2001
Total 9/11 Info
earlier noted increased density—despite official claims that may be highly
exaggerated, or outdated, of 2-10 kilogram masses, etc.
Questions Questions
Indeed these methods may make it easier to produce small yield nukes out The Web Fairy
Wing TV
of fission only, and not have any fusion. And tiny nukes were needed, at
the WTC, so as to not obviously nuke through the whole building at once,
or Manhattan for that matter. So if only fission nukes could be made so 9/11 Activism
small, we can see how the redundant emplacement of many of these could 9/11 Blogger
have given rise to the China Syndrome, beginning on 9/11. Indeed these 9/11 Citizens' Watch
small nukes that employ methods to “damp” them down, may be difficult to 9/11 Skeptics Unite!
standardize. That is, a little too much damping, and it stops the chain 911 Truth.org
reaction before any significant yield is attained. Thus I now have a third 911 Truth LA.us
possible causative factor that may have led to fizzled nukes! E.g., they 911 Truth LA.org
would have used the lowest yield nukes in the smaller buildings, and 911 Truth Emergence
possibly many of these same devices were placed in the larger towers—or 911 We Know
several larger ones, as I originally wrote. Again, I have asserted, all micro- 911 Truth Movement Musings
nukes in WTC7 fizzled in the morning. See
9-11 UK
http://covertoperations.blogspot.com/2007/09/breakthroughs-
toward-attaining-complete.html
NY 9/11 Truth

And WTC6, with it’s nearly perfect spherical hole, looks like JUST ONE
mini-, or micro-nuke exploded there. If this one had fizzled, they would
have had to do a WTC7 later in the day, for WTC6 also! What I am saying
Summer of Truth
is that they likely tried to have several go off (redundancy), but that Proposition 911
spherical hole indicates just one went off, and came close to being too Reopen 911
large, if you know what I mean. Many smaller ones— to hide the nuking, Deception Dollars
was the order of the day— if possible. And these methods, to reduce the Justice for 9/11
minimal critical mass, may make these micro-nukes very sensitive to
fizzling. So this hypothesis of how to make a micro-nuke, may be coherent
with the rest of my hypotheses, including fizzled nukes in WTC7 and the 9/11 Specialty Sites
towers, and the subsequent China Syndrome of high heat generating Team 8 Plus
radioactive fragments, and the three month long hot, large, rubble pile, and Flight 93 Hoax
WTC Demolition
the six month long very high heat underneath the towers and WTC7. The
latter due to insufficiency of the radiation-lowering methods of sand and
9/11 Photo Analysis
water.
I might even speculate that the fizzled North Korean Nuke (of 2006) may WTC
have been given to them by none other than the American regime. And it 9/11 and the Impossible: the WTC
was one of the WTC-type small nukes— with the same fizzled result! See collapse
http://www.defensetech.org/archives/002832.html This is part of WTC Streaking Object, WTC7 theories
the op of having a bogus enemy for a possible bogus future war. Flight 77 FOIA site
Flight 93 Crash.com
So we may have a cohesive body of knowledge tieing together micro- Pentagon Research
nukes, fizzled nukes—among the ones that did go off--on 9/11, and the Brad's Pentagon Analysis
subsequent China Syndrome at New York City’s World trade Center. Where Is Osama (The Osama Clock)
Unlike Hiroshima, all this arose because the American regime needed to
hide the nuking of New York City from its residents! But the nuclear cat is 9/11 Flash Movies
out of the bag, and making its presence more and more known every day. 9/11 chronology (network footage)
Buddy Buddy
Pentagon Strike
posted by spooked @ 6:48 AM 911 Questions

that question 9/11
<< Home Rigorous Intuition
Wing TV
Xymphora
Killtown's Blog
George Washington
Propaganda Matrix
Daniel Hopsicker
Cryptome
World Order News
Good Intro Books to

Griffin
Ray Griffin
Ian Henshall
Webster G. Tarpley
Thompson

Ruppert
Hopsicker

Arctic Beacon

with 9/11
Break for News
Tom Flocco

Buzzflash
The Raw Story
Think Progress
Common Dreams
Consortium News
Cursor
Guerrilla News
Online Journal
The Memory Hole
Press Action
News from Babylon
Unknown News
TV News Lies
Eschaton
Daily Kos
Talking Points Memo
Hullabaloo
Billmon
The Brad Blog
Jesus' General
The Rude Pundit
The Poor Man
Today in Iraq
Antiwar.com
Constant Pated
Clusterfuck Nation
Donkey Rising
Salon
Slate
My Other Blogs
Al-CIA-duh
Ghost Plane
Flight 93 Hoax


Peak Oil and

Oil and Gas
The Oil Drum
Land of Black Gold
Richard Heinberg
Grist

Conspiracy Theory!
World Trade Center Demolition: A Summary of Evidence of EMPs (Electromagnetic Pulses) from the Nukes Used in the WTC on 9/11

Friday, May 02, 2008 trade center buildings 1, 2
A Summary of Evidence of EMPs (Electromagnetic demolition.
Pulses) from the Nukes Used in the WTC on 9/11

Name: spooked
There is a great need to highlight and summarize the evidence of EMPs, Location: United States
(from nuclear bombs) that occurred in the WTC buildings, on 9/11, from my
articles and other sources. The MSM ignores this crucial EMP evidence, The official 9/11 story is a lie. The 9/11 plane
and all the intel assets on the web continue to lie and claim, “There’s no hijackings and crashes were clever hoaxes. The
evidence of EMP.” WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7 towers were brought
Now a nuclear bomb will emit a great flux of gamma rays. These will ionize use of small nuclear bombs in the demolition of
(expel electrons from) surrounding air molecules. The electrons’ behavior is WTC1 and 2. All in all, 9/11 was a massive and
such that a coherent electromagnetic wave front moves outward. This has cruel hoax foisted upon the world, done in order
been named an Electromagnetic Pulse, or EMP. An EMP will adversely to spark the obscene "war on terror", to cover up
affect any metallic objects that it intersects as it reaches them. A high financial fraud and to further the ends of the
voltage and current will be induced into the metal, which can cause global elite. 9/11 was only the most egregious of
circuitry, or any metallic parts to melt, catch fire, or explode. Just what an several other recent false-flag terror operations.
EMP will do to a metallic object is determined in part by the intensity of the
EMP, distance to the object, angle, intervening shielding, and other factors. View my complete profile
The intensity of an EMP from a nuke is determined by the strength/yield of
the nuke, altitude of detonation, its type and design. In general, the smaller More 9/11 Links (Note: I present a wide
the nuke, the smaller the strength and effective range of the EMP it will variety of 9/11 sites here for the
produce. A multi-megaton nuke exploded in the upper atmosphere can purposes of diversity. I leave it up to
cause a continent-wide EMP. A micro-nuke would yield an EMP of only you to judge their content.)
some fraction of a mile. Possibly only a couple of blocks depending on
where it was detonated, shielding etc. In my articles, I have repeatedly
highlighted eyewitness accounts of phenomena that appear to ONLY be General 9/11 Sites
explainable via EMPs. Note this article on EMP effects states, "The 9/11 Blimp
ensuing massive sparking of cable jackets, their contact to frame and the 9/11 Busters
ground, and breakdowns in connectors put the equipment out of action and 9/11 CGI Watch
lead to fires and explosions." For the record, I note that for decades now,
9/11 Complicity
first beginning with the military, it has been known how to “harden” planes
9/11 Cover-Up
and helicopters so as to block an EMP’s effects on their electronics.
9/11 Dossier (UK)
Perhaps the most remarkable are the statements of 9/11 responder, EMT 9/11 Encyclopedia
Patricia Ondrovic. She reached the WTC area shortly before tower 1 and 9/11 Foreknowledge
WTC 5, 6 (right near her at the time) would be destroyed. She tried to 9/11 Hoax
enter WTC6, but was forbidden by guards. But as she looked into the lobby
9/11 Oddities
of WTC6 she “saw a series of flashes around the ceiling of the lobby all
going off one-by-one like the X-mass lights that chase in pattern." This is 9/11 Overview
best explained by one or more EMPs passing through that area and
9/11 Plot
causing wires or lighting fixtures to “pop.” Furthermore, at that same time,
9/11 Proof
she reports that cars near her, and right outside WTC6, caught fire for no
apparent reason. As she started to flee, a car door exploded off a car and 9/11 Resources
hit her and knocked her down and injured her ribs. All this happened as 9/11 Review.org
WTC 5, 6 and Tower 1 began to explode. The exploding car door is again 9/11 Review.com
only explainable via EMP. As I have explained here, “As the nuke(s)'
http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2008/05/summary-of-evidence-of-emps.html[07.11.2010 15:05:04]
9/11 Stealth
concomitant EMP(s) (Electromagnetic Pulse) passed through her 9/11 Strike
immediate vicinity, it intercepted the cars near her. The intense 9/11 True Story
electromagnetic wave induces a great current in metal (and not in “people 9/11 "U"
or paper”). The current becomes great heat, resulting in rapid expansion of 9/11 Verses
said metal. A given car door can only expand so much before its boundary Awoken Research Group
is reached and there is nowhere for the heat or expansion to go, which Complete 9/11 Timeline (Paul
Thompson)
results in doors or handles (if they are metallic), etc. exploding off. This is Finnish 9/11 Site
why you will see some cars with only their paint vaporized (intercepted only Finnish 9/11 Site in English
low level EMP due to distance, angle, shielding etc.), and other cars will Gallerize
show a burnt front, but the back half is virtually "normal." The German Engineers 9/11 site
Electromagnetic Field and subsequent current is stopped at the boundaries Hybrideb's 9/11 site
of the doors.” Icelandic 9/11 site
Ondrovic’ statements also indicate that WTC6 likely was itself destroyed by Juscogen's 9/11 site
a micro-nuke which is further evidenced by its one large spherical hole. Killtown
Note that Ondrovic’ interview with the WTC Commission is heavily Oil and Empire 9/11 (Mark Robinowitz)
redacted. I have noted that by the time it began its interviewing of 503 9/11 Portland Indy Media 9/11
surviving responders, traitors from the CIA had been brought in, including 119 Questions about 9/11
Let's Roll 9/11
former CIA Director, Woolsey. Her interviews are here and here.
Essay
The statements made by WTC1 engineer, Mike Pecoraro here and in my Morgan Reynolds 9/11 Commission
article here also indicated that he witnessed the effects of a nuclear bomb Essay
going off in the sub-basement where he was working. He wrote that he first Missile Gate (analysis of 1st hit)
Nerdcities 9/11
knew something was wrong after his co-worker tapped him on the shoulder
Operation 9/11
to alert him that he had just seen “the lights flicker”-- as did Ondrovic in the
Planet Quo 9/11
lobby of WTC6. Pecoraro then went up to the C level to assay damage,
and I have asserted he has provided some of the strongest statements RINF 9/11 Archive
proving a nuclear blast went off in the sub-basement of tower 1, at the time Terrorize (Danish 911 site)
of the first (CGI) “plane hit” explosion above (used as cover for a sub- The Mysteries of 9/11
basement nuke). Pecoraro stated he saw “a 50 ton hydraulic press gone!" THE TRUTH ABOUT SEPT 11 (Compiled
“[Pecoraro and a co-worker then] made their way to the parking garage, by Gerard Holmgren)
but found that it, too, was gone”… As they ascended to the B Level, one Shunned
floor above, they “were astonished to see a steel and concrete fire door Physics 911
Physics 9/11.co.nr
that weighed about 300 pounds, wrinkled up like a piece of aluminum foil."
Plague Puppy's Cafe
To sum up, it appears that Pecoraro’s co-worker first saw the light-
flickering effects of an EMP, from a nuke, going off above them, and this
Question 911
was verified by the unique damage they observed at the upper basement Truth 911
levels. The shriveled up, foil-like, former massive steel and concrete door Brad's 911 site
is easily explained to occur from intense neutron bombardment, from a Club Ivy's 911 site
nuclear bomb. Brad's old 9/11 site
The reason Pecoraro’s statements look so different, and more powerful Serendipity (various essays on 9/11)
than most others can be explained, as follows. Nearly all eyewitness Stop the Lie 9/11
accounts are in some government commission or investigation body’s The Strange Images of 9/11/2001
reports. All the intel agents in control heavily censor all these. Similarly, the Total 9/11 Info
MSM wouldn’t disseminate such an eyewitness account either. Instead of Unanswered Questions
being independent watchdogs, all the MSM have, for many years, been just Questions Questions
a branch of the regime. The MSM is controlled by its worst elements: The Web Fairy
Wing TV
chronologically, first military “intelligence”, then the FBI, then the CIA and
the NSA. Pecoraro’s statement appears in the online newsletter of his own
Chief Engineers Association, a fraternal or union-like organization. It has 9/11 Activism
apparently not (yet) been infiltrated and controlled by any of the Gestapo 9/11 Blogger
agencies. You might want to archive his statements before they disappear. 9/11 Citizens' Watch
Similarly to Ondrovic’ report of cars catching fire for no apparent reason, is 911 Truth.org
the account of 9/11 responder, Paramedic Robert Ruiz. 911 Truth LA.us
911 Truth LA.org
In my article here, I noted Ruiz’ utter incredulity at watching a car 911 Truth Emergence
completely catch on fire for no discernible reason. His full statement to the 911 We Know
WTC Commission is here. Ruiz just barely escaped WTC2 being 911 Truth Movement Musings
destroyed. First he describes the ground near him shaking BEFORE the
9-11 UK
“collapse” starts. This could be evidence of an underground nuclear bomb
going off before the top was brought down. He says, the ground shakes,
NY 9/11 Truth
then WTC2 starts to come down, and he runs and survives under a nearby

doorway. Ruiz then states, "I was trapped there. Like things weren't bad Scholars for 9/11 Truth
enough already, the car that's parked right on that corner catches on fire. I Community Currency 9/11
don't mean a little fire, the entire thing. Don't ask me how. The entire car Summer of Truth
caught on fire. You would think maybe just a motor part or just the engine Proposition 911
part. But this entire car just goes up in fire." Reopen 911
Deception Dollars
Justice for 9/11
An EMP’s explosive effect on electronic components is demonstrated by an
NYPD officer who has only revealed his (supposedly) first name-- Craig.
Former NYPD officer “Craig” is now disabled with Pulmonary Fibrosis after
Team 8 Plus
working for a month at the WTC site. He was driving in the vicinity of the
Flight 93 Hoax
towers at the moment of the first “plane hit.” He says, "The next thing WTC Demolition
I remember was a sound, not unlike a serious car accident, The Ultimate Hijacker Compilation
just one block west of me on Church Street. My radio 9/11 Photo Analysis
exploded just then.” Evidence of Explosives on 9/11
In my article here, I cited the remarkable interview of 9/11 responder, Dr. WTC
Michael Guttenberg, of the NYFD’s Office of Medical Affairs. His full WTC collapse
Commission interview is here. WTC Streaking Object, WTC7 theories
Flight 77 FOIA site
The following is from his interview. Just after the second “plane hit” Flight 93 Crash.com
explosion, and before any tower “collapse”, he noted: Pentagon Research
Guttenberg: “…on the EMS radio, there was absolute silence for probably Where Is Osama (The Osama Clock)
10 or 15 seconds …”
9/11 Flash Movies

Questioner: “We were told that the air was so thick with debris that radio
Buddy Buddy
Pentagon Strike
Guttenberg: “That was after the towers came down.” 911 Questions
From my article above: “Note two things, the radios went dead—likely a
sign of EMP. And see how the questioner attempts to confuse the issue Reasonably reliable "Conspiracy Sites"
with a double lie. One, that this happened after a tower was destroyed, that question 9/11
when instead, this is after the second WTC2 “plane hit” explosion, and Rigorous Intuition
BEFORE any tower “collapse” as Dr. Guttenberg corrects him. And two, Wing TV
that radio waves would have been blocked by a conventional explosion, Xymphora
when they wouldn’t have been. And note also that this radio blackout Killtown's Blog
occurred after the second “plane hit” explosion. My previous articles
contained evidence, and my hypothesis, that the WTC1 “plane hit”
George Washington
explosion was used as cover for a nearly simultaneous basement nuclear
bomb explosion that vaporized a 50 ton steel press, and a garage level, Prison Planet (Alex Jones)
and also caused phone outage. So we learn now that electronic Daily Two Minutes of Hate
communications also were affected after the second “plane hit”, which may The Emperor's New Clothes
indicates that they also nuked the basement of WTC2 at that time. I Public Action (Carol Valentine)
hypothesized that this was done in case the planned, subsequent, intricate, Propaganda Matrix
top-down demolition failed.” Daniel Hopsicker
Cryptome
The 911Eyewitness video-- especially the short film entitled “WMD at the Crimes and Corruptions of the New
World Order News
WTC” which was never made into a feature length video, though this was
promised for September 2007-- shows EMP effects on the video camera at
the onset of destruction of a tower.
Good Intro Books to
Even Wood and Reynolds had a brief intersection with the truth when they Alternative 9/11 Truth
wrote here that "Electrical outage over a wide area with repairs taking over
three months, suggesting EM pulses." Questions About the Bush
Griffin
In this article I cited how a woman emerging from a nearby subway exit "The 9/11 Commission Report:
just after WTC1 “plane impact” had tried to use nearby phones and said Omissions And Distortions" by David
Ray Griffin
they did not work at that time. Again the most likely cause is a nearby
EMP. The original URL is here. The link to Sun News goes to a 2006 Ian Henshall
article in the Sun News, a Cleveland newspaper, and appears to no longer "9/11 Synthetic Terror, Made in USA" by
work at this time. Webster G. Tarpley
Thompson
Engineer Ted Twietmeyer has written here about the EMP damage to "Crossing the Rubicon" by Michael C.
cars on 9/11. His explanation of the shielding effect, and also his simple Ruppert
vector analysis indicates EMP effects originated from above ground "Welcome to Terrorland" by Daniel
Hopsicker
locations. This jives with my complete WTC destruction scenario that states
a single sub-basement nuke was set off in each tower, in near simultaneity
to the bogus “plane hits.” Then during WTC destruction, numerous top- "Conspiracy Sites" that deal with 9/11
bottom smaller nukes were set off in the towers, and in WTC5, 6 and that I have significant issues with
WTC7--whose nukes fizzled, and had to be nuked with (brought in) new What Really Happened
nukes, some 5 hours later. From the Wilderness (Mike Ruppert)
Arctic Beacon
For completeness now, I discuss the totality of the matter of damage to

cars, and other vehicles, at or near the WTC. There appears to be much
with 9/11
misinformation or disinformation in this regard. Many things happened to Break for News
vehicles near the WTC on 9/11. Some of this is easily explained by Tom Flocco
conventional forces; but some of this is again only explained by EMPs, or
other nuclear phenomena. Some vehicles were likely damaged by fiery
debris falling onto them leading to fires and destruction of these vehicles. Democratic/Progressive News Sites,
Similarly, non-fiery, falling debris could have caused gas explosions and/or Blogs and Miscellaneous Links
fires in these vehicles. The explosive blast winds created during nuclear Buzzflash
destruction of the WTC were reported to be so intense, by some The Raw Story
responders, that they upended vehicles, even firetrucks. Fires and Democratic Underground
explosions could have ensued from this. This would likely be only a close- Progressive Independent
Think Progress
by effect.
Common Dreams
Then there were the pyroclastic clouds--created during the very hot nuclear
Consortium News
destruction of the WTC buildings--which could have engulfed numerous Center for Cooperative Research
vehicles near the WTC. This would have caused “whole vehicle” damage-- Cursor
perhaps causing complete browning of these vehicles. But like the blast Guerrilla News
effects just noted, this would likely be a close-by effect only. This is Online Journal
because the physics of these pyroclastic clouds would dictate that they The Memory Hole
would cool down rapidly in terms of distance and time. These clouds cool Information Clearing House
off quickly as they expand. Within a block or two of their creation, their heat Press Action
likely killed people, and caused fires or explosions in vehicles, via high News from Babylon
temperature. But within a short distance of another block or two, the rapid Unknown News
expansion/cooling effect may have lessened their temperatures so that TV News Lies
they would no longer be fatal to people or cause fires, etc. in vehicles. This After Downing Street
rapid cooling-off effect is similar to the hypocenter of a nuke itself, which Eschaton
Daily Kos
goes from one million degrees to 10,000 degrees in one millisecond (one
Talking Points Memo
thousandth of a second). Due to the nukes being only micro-nukes, and
Hullabaloo
the matter of altitude and shielding, their EMPs likely also were significant
Billmon
for only 1-several blocks. The Brad Blog
Jesus' General
The Rude Pundit
Thus I conclude that the ejecta from the destruction of the towers allows for The Poor Man
damage to vehicles at the greatest distance, as compared to the other Juan Cole (Informed Comment)
possible factors above. This is even verified by Ondrovic in her interviews. Today in Iraq
She reports that when she was taken to the hospital, in an ambulance, Antiwar.com
WTC2 was being destroyed; and her ambulance was pelted with small Iraq Coalition Casualties
debris perhaps a mile away. So larger chunks could have been exploded Constant Pated
outward that could have impacted vehicles, say within a half-mile from the Clusterfuck Nation
WTC. Such larger chunks could have had enough energy to cause a fire or Donkey Rising
explosion if it hit the vehicle in the right place. Salon
Slate
But the type of damage to vehicles is the key to noting EMP-caused fires
in, or on, these vehicles. When we observe that the only damage is to My Other Blogs
PART of the vehicle (as opposed to the entire vehicle as would occur in an Humint Events Online
engulfment by say a pyroclastic cloud), we can conclude that EMP was THE WORST PRESIDENT EVER!!!!
likely involved. When we observe that only part of a vehicle has had its Bush Administration War Criminals
paint burned off, we can conclude that that part of the vehicle was Fake Opposition Democrats
intercepted by a low level EMP. The current induced was only strong Al-CIA-duh
enough to lead to a temperature that was able to burn some paint, and not Ghost Plane
cause parts of the vehicle to catch fire, or have a door explode off. When Flight 93 Hoax
we see that great damage and/or fire has occurred again to only part of the
vehicle, like this:
perhaps a stronger EMP is the most likely culprit. Note the back half looks
“pristine.” Cars observed only after towing to a distant parking lot, should
not enter this (unless a chain of evidence can be proven), as we can’t be
sure of anything about these vehicles. But we don’t need ludicrous,
evidence-free theories to explain the damage seen on these vehicles. Both Interesting Mainstream Articles on 9/11
conventional forces, and EMP, or blast, from nukes explain all the types of Boston Globe 11/23/01 piece
vehicle damage observed. Flight 93 and New Baltimore piece
To sum up, there is much physical evidence
and eyewitness testimony, and even some Miscellaneous Items of Interest
video evidence, for effects that could only
have been caused by Electromagnetic Pulses The American Taliban
from nuclear devices. This easily explains
how cars and not people or paper were Peak Oil and
adversely affected. Do not be dissuaded by
all the intel agents getting paid to lie and say Oil and Gas
The Oil Drum
“there was no evidence of EMP,” or that some Land of Black Gold
“new phenomena” could explain any of this. Flying Talking Donkey
The case for EMPs from nuclear bombs in the Richard Heinberg
WTC buildings, on 9/11, has been proven. Grist
Please post this everywhere. The life you
save may be your own. The Official 9/11 Story IS a
Conspiracy Theory!
posted by spooked @ 7:48 AM 9/11 was a conspiracy, as it involved several
<< Home "CONSPIRACY THEORY"!
World Trade Center Demolition: WTC Destruction Theories: "DEW" versus Thermite/Thermate/Super Thermate versus Milli-Nukes/Micro-Nukes

Saturday, July 19, 2008 trade center buildings 1, 2
WTC Destruction Theories: "DEW" versus demolition.
Thermite/Thermate/Super Thermate versus Milli-
Nukes/Micro-Nukes
About Me
In theory, all of these may have been used in combination with Name: spooked
conventional explosives (e.g. C-4) -- and each of these may also have Location: United States
been used in come combination together. But let's discuss the PRIMARY
mechanism used for the WTC tower demolition, since there still is apparent The official 9/11 story is a lie. The 9/11 plane
controversy over this. hijackings and crashes were clever hoaxes. The
DEW = directed energy weapons; typically described as a powerful beam down by demolition, and there is evidence for the
weapon; type of energy has not been specified; originally proposed by Judy use of small nuclear bombs in the demolition of
Wood and Morgan Reynolds WTC1 and 2. All in all, 9/11 was a massive and
Thermite/Thermate/Super Thermate = high temperature incendiary mixture to spark the obscene "war on terror", to cover up
(thermite) and hypothetical explosive variants (thermate and super- financial fraud and to further the ends of the
thermate); originally proposed by Steven Jones global elite. 9/11 was only the most egregious of
Milli-Nukes/Micro-Nukes = explosive nuclear fusion or nuclear fission
devices; proposed by several different people: Finnish Military expert
(advanced fusion devices only), Ed Ward, Bill Deagle, Anonymous
Physicist More 9/11 Links (Note: I present a wide
The complete massive destruction of the WTC purposes of diversity. I leave it up to
towers was characterized by several key
features:
General 9/11 Sites
1) incredible pulverization/"dustification" of all building contents in a matter
9/11 Blimp
of seconds 9/11 Busters
2) pulverized debris violently bursting outward during the destruction 9/11 CGI Watch
3) a consecutive series of "explosive" waves traveling down the towers 9/11 Closeup (Gerard Holmgren)
during the demolition 9/11 Complicity
4) disappearance/vaporization of large numbers of interior core columns 9/11 Cover-Up
5) various odd phenomena-- likely EMP effects on vehicles and some 9/11 Dossier (UK)
electronic devices, odd holes in the ground and in surrounding buildings, 9/11 Encyclopedia
early basement explosions, "hanging skin" in some surviving victims
9/11 Foreknowledge
6) extreme high heat in the ground zero rubble (widely-reported/well-
substantiated) 9/11 Hoax
7) large number of sicknesses/cancers in ground zero responders 9/11 Oddities
8) suspicious treatment of remaining WTC steel-- washing, extreme 9/11 Overview
security on trucks taking it away, rapid sale to China 9/11 Oz (Australian)
9/11 Plot
9/11 Proof
I will now go over pros and cons of these hypotheses, focusing solely on 9/11 Research (Jim Hoffman)
the WTC evidence, without any discussion of the character or reliability of 9/11 Resources
the proponents of the various theories. I am taking for granted that the 9/11 Review.org
towers were demolished by added energy devices -- not by fires and 9/11 Review.com
http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2008/07/wtc-destruction-theories-dew-versus.html[07.11.2010 15:06:34]
gravitational collapse. Further, I am assuming that there has been some 9/11 Stealth
sort of active cover-up of the demolition on the part of the official agencies 9/11 Strike
and the media. 9/11 True Story
-------------------- 9/11 "U"
9/11 Verses
PROS for DEW:
1) malleable nature of the "DEW" can explain everything associated with Thompson)
the tower destruction except the lingering heat at ground zero Finnish 9/11 Site
2) towers did not need to be pre-loaded with devices Finnish 9/11 Site in English
Gallerize
CONS for DEW: German Engineers 9/11 site
1) type of DEW-emitting device and what type of directed energy was used Hybrideb's 9/11 site
on the WTC is completely unspecified Icelandic 9/11 site
2) no DEW technology known that can explain the vaporization of steel and Jane Doe's 9/11 site
the extreme pulverization of concrete and the majority of inner building
Killtown
components-- all in seconds
3) huge amounts of energy required for DEW that can dustify the towers
but no source of energy has been specified 119 Questions about 9/11
4) needs to make the major assumption that the extreme heat at ground Let's Roll 9/11
zero is a massive lie Morgan Reynolds WTC Demolition
5) does not explain the sicknesses/cancers in ground zero responders as Essay
easily as radiation from nuclear devices Morgan Reynolds 9/11 Commission
Essay
6) does not explain the suspicious treatment of remaining WTC steel Missile Gate (analysis of 1st hit)
Nerdcities 9/11
Paper-- I do not think the presence of unburnt sheets of paper in the WTC Operation 9/11
dust can be construed as evidence for DEW, as the towers were Planet Quo 9/11
undoubted filled with paper, and it's not at all clear what percentage of Rick Siegel (9/11 Eyewitness)
paper was destroyed. Paper is also light and some paper would thus would RINF 9/11 Archive
be expected to be blown out and away by explosive blasts, ahead of the Terrorize (Danish 911 site)
highest energy wave. The Mysteries of 9/11
by Gerard Holmgren)
Aluminum versus Steel-- I do not find the argument convincing that
Shunned
aluminum cladding intrinsically avoided destruction whereas the steel Physics 911
columns were vaporized. Physics 9/11.co.nr
Plague Puppy's Cafe
Lack of bathtub damage and intact shops and tunnels beneath the WTC-- Plague Puppy: Alternate Site
any sort of extreme pulverization of the towers from the top-down would Question 911
lessen the overall impact on the ground of the towers' destruction; it's not Truth 911
clear where the intact shops and tunnels seen in pictures were in relation Brad's 911 site
to the two main destroyed towers, thus this is inconclusive Club Ivy's 911 site
Lack of large explosive sounds-- I do not think there is completely Flamesong 9/11 Essay and Links
convincing case that can be made for lack of explosive sounds Serendipity (various essays on 9/11)
Stop the Lie 9/11
DEW Pro/Con = Negative 4 Total 9/11 Info
-------------------------- Unanswered Questions
Questions Questions
PROS for Thermite/Thermate/Super Thermate The Web Fairy
1) can explain some of the loss of steel as thermite can melt iron Wing TV
2) might explain the lingering high heat and reports of molten steel
9/11 Activism
CONS for Thermite/Thermate/Super Thermate
9/11 Blogger
1) difficult to imagine an incendiary chemical mixture being used to rapidly 9/11 Citizens' Watch
demolish a building 9/11 Skeptics Unite!
2) difficult to imagine how explosive thermite/thermate could be used to 911 Truth.org
vaporize steel columns if the incendiary mixture is being dispersed by 911 Truth LA.us
exploding at the same time 911 Truth LA.org
3) not clear that super thermate can account for the pulverization of the 911 Truth Emergence
towers or that it even exists 911 We Know
4) not clear that residual thermite/thermate/super thermate can account for 911 Truth Movement Musings
the extreme heat that lasted for at least six weeks at ground zero 9-11 Visibility Project
5) requires massive pre-loading of the towers with large 9-11 UK
incendiary/explosive devices 9/11 Family Steering Committee
6) does not explain the sicknesses/cancers in ground zero responders as NY 9/11 Truth
easily as radiation from nuclear devices San Francisco 9/11 Truth

7) does not explain the suspicious treatment of remaining WTC steel
Summer of Truth
Thermite/Thermate/Super Thermate Pro/Con= Negative 4 Proposition 911
---------------------------- Reopen 911
Deception Dollars
PROS for Milli-Nukes/Micro-Nukes Justice for 9/11
1) can easily explain all the features of the destruction of the towers
2) powerful, well-known, well-established destructive technology
3) small but extremely powerful and so do not require massive
Team 8 Plus
emplacement of devices in the towers Flight 93 Hoax
WTC Demolition
CONS for Milli-Nukes/Micro-Nukes The Ultimate Hijacker Compilation
1) cover-up required for radiation at ground zero 9/11 Photo Analysis
One common argument I have seen made against nukes is that extremely Demolition, the Truth of 9/11 and the
bright flashes from nuclear explosions are not seen in videos. However this WTC
is not a definitive contrary argument as it is not clear what kind of flash collapse
would be seen from a very small nuke going off in the middle of steel WTC Streaking Object, WTC7 theories
tower-- especially once the first explosion has occurred and there are Flight 77 FOIA site
massive dust clouds that could shield the flashes of further explosions. Flight 93 Crash.com
Further, for tower 2, definitely, a few small bright flashes can be seen Pentagon Research
going off coincident with the tower going down. Brad's Pentagon Analysis
Milli-Nukes/Micro-Nukes Pro/Con= Positive 2
----------------------- 9/11 Flash Movies
Does anyone have a reasonable argument, based on the evidence, not on Buddy Buddy
personalities, to add here? Pentagon Strike
911 Questions
that question 9/11
Rigorous Intuition
<< Home Wing TV
Xymphora
Killtown's Blog
George Washington
Propaganda Matrix
Daniel Hopsicker
Cryptome
World Order News
Good Intro Books to

Griffin
Ray Griffin
Ian Henshall
Webster G. Tarpley
Thompson

Ruppert
Hopsicker

Arctic Beacon

with 9/11
Break for News
Tom Flocco

Buzzflash
The Raw Story
Think Progress
Common Dreams
Consortium News
Cursor
Guerrilla News
Online Journal
The Memory Hole
Press Action
News from Babylon
Unknown News
TV News Lies
Eschaton
Daily Kos
Talking Points Memo
Hullabaloo
Billmon
The Brad Blog
Jesus' General
The Rude Pundit
The Poor Man
Today in Iraq
Antiwar.com
Constant Pated
Clusterfuck Nation
Donkey Rising
Salon
Slate
My Other Blogs
Al-CIA-duh
Ghost Plane
Flight 93 Hoax


Peak Oil and

Oil and Gas
The Oil Drum
Land of Black Gold
Richard Heinberg
Grist

Conspiracy Theory!
World Trade Center Demolition: Ground Zero Smoking Cannon: Where Are All the Core Columns and Beams???

Saturday, August 23, 2008 trade center buildings 1, 2
Ground Zero Smoking Cannon: Where Are All the demolition.
Core Columns and Beams???
(UPDATED 8/24/08) About Me

Name: spooked
The destruction of the WTC left basically four major types of large Location: United States
structural debris visible in photos like this:

General 9/11 Sites

9/11 Blimp
9/11 Busters
(click to enlarge; this image was cropped from a larger picture taken 9/11 CGI Watch
September 23rd, 2001) 9/11 Closeup (Gerard Holmgren)
9/11 Complicity
There was lots of aluminum cladding (the silvery stuff that spread the 9/11 Cover-Up
farthest and was seen on the rooftops of surrounding buildings), there were 9/11 Dossier (UK)
sections of the outer wall (these have the characteristic "wheat-chex" 9/11 Encyclopedia
appearance, which were groups of columns linked by spandrel plates), 9/11 Foreknowledge
there were many small beams of unclear origin (the right size for broken-
9/11 Hoax
off outer columns but could also be floor beams -- many floors of the WTC
were supported by beams and not trusses-- or small core cross-beams), 9/11 Oddities
and last, there were the huge core columns and core cross- 9/11 Overview
beams (the largest single separate columns that are strewn 9/11 Oz (Australian)
about like matchsticks in the photo above). 9/11 Plot
9/11 Proof
The core of the WTC was in fact huge-- in contrast to some conceptions of 9/11 Research (Jim Hoffman)
the core after 9/11, the core structure took up a major amount of the space 9/11 Resources
inside the tower-- it was roughly 80 feet by 130 feet in cross-section, in the 9/11 Review.org
207 by 207 foot cross-section of the tower, and it left about 60 feet of floor 9/11 Review.com
http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2006/12/ground-zero-smoking-cannon-where-are.html[07.11.2010 15:08:33]
9/11 Stealth
on two sides and about 30 feet of floor on the other two sides.
9/11 Strike
9/11 True Story
The core was composed of 46-47 vertical sets of long columns that went
9/11 "U"
the length of the building, and the core was abundantly cross-braced 9/11 Verses
by steel beams. Additional information on the core structures can be Awoken Research Group
seen here and here and here. Complete 9/11 Timeline (Paul
Thompson)
In the picture above, you can see that some of the largest core column Finnish 9/11 Site
pieces were close to 100 feet long. In fact, the longest individual core Finnish 9/11 Site in English
columns were 36 feet long, so the longest columns shown in the photo Gallerize
must be two or three sections welded together that clearly stayed together German Engineers 9/11 site
during the destruction process.
Icelandic 9/11 site
Now that we have good information on the precise numbers and
sizes of the WTC core columns, it turns out there were Killtown
approximately 1974 total core column sections, and at least Oil and Empire 9/11 (Mark Robinowitz)
50% of these were large rectangular box columns, 3 to 4 Portland Indy Media 9/11
feet wide (note, this is an underestimation). Thus there 119 Questions about 9/11
were at least 980 of the very large column sections in just Let's Roll 9/11
ONE tower. These columns would be the prominent ones in Morgan Reynolds WTC Demolition
the photo. Essay
Essay
The numbers of steel beams in the cross-bracings was Missile Gate (analysis of 1st hit)
much, much greater. At a minimum of 14 large cross-beams Nerdcities 9/11
per floor, we're talking over 1500 more large steel beams. Operation 9/11
All told, we're talking about close to 3500 large steel Planet Quo 9/11
columns and beams in the core, with 980 of these the Rick Siegel (9/11 Eyewitness)
massive 3 to 4 feet wide core columns. RINF 9/11 Archive
So this begs the question: how many core columns and core The Mysteries of 9/11
cross-beams are seen in the remnants of a WTC tower, such THE TRUTH ABOUT SEPT 11 (Compiled
by Gerard Holmgren)
as in the remains of WTC1 in the photo here: Shunned
Physics 911
Physics 9/11.co.nr
Plague Puppy's Cafe
Question 911
Truth 911
Brad's 911 site
Club Ivy's 911 site
Stop the Lie 9/11
Total 9/11 Info
Questions Questions
The Web Fairy
Wing TV
9/11 Activism
9/11 Blogger
I have marked with a black line anything that could be considered a large 911 Truth.org
core column. 911 Truth LA.us
911 Truth LA.org
Erring on the side of calling everything remotely close to a large steel 911 Truth Emergence
beam or column, I only count about 200 large core column sections (taking 911 We Know
into account the idea that some of these columns are double 36 foot
sections).
9-11 UK
This leaves over 750 HUGE STEEL core columns unaccounted for!*** NY 9/11 Truth

Further, there are still 1500 large core cross-beams and hundreds of Scholars for 9/11 Truth
remaining substantial core columns unaccounted for, that should be filling Community Currency 9/11
the debris pile but are not clearly there. Summer of Truth
Proposition 911
This picture was taken very shortly after 9/11, as the west wall WTC1 is still Reopen 911
not cleaned up (lower left foreground), and shows that the large core Deception Dollars
columns were not moved between 9/11 and 9/23: Justice for 9/11

Team 8 Plus
Flight 93 Hoax
WTC Demolition
9/11 Photo Analysis
WTC
collapse
Flight 77 FOIA site
Flight 93 Crash.com
Pentagon Research
9/11 Flash Movies

Buddy Buddy
Pentagon Strike
911 Questions

that question 9/11
Rigorous Intuition
Wing TV
Xymphora
Killtown's Blog
George Washington
Propaganda Matrix
Daniel Hopsicker
Cryptome
World Order News
Good Intro Books to

Griffin
(click to view separately) Ray Griffin
Ian Henshall
Thus, it wasn't that hundreds of the columns were carted away before 9/23 "9/11 Synthetic Terror, Made in USA" by
(when the top picture was taken). Further, given the massive size of the Webster G. Tarpley
large core columns, they would not be able to be lifted out until the outer "The Terror Timeline" by Paul
Thompson
debris was cleaned up and the cranes could be moved in closer-- which
was only just starting to happen on 9/23. Ruppert
Now sure, some core columns and beams are going to be buried under the Hopsicker
rubble and not visible. But almost 800 of these monster pieces of steel are
buried in a rubble pile that wasn't more than 10 feet deep outside of the "Conspiracy Sites" that deal with 9/11
footprint of the towers, and no more than 60 feet deep within the footprint that I have significant issues with
of the tower??? What Really Happened
I don't think so. Arctic Beacon
Not to mention that the videos showed that much of the core clearly came
down last (or at least large sections of it came down at the end), and Unreliable "Conspiracy Sites" that deal
therefore the core columns and beams should have been at the top of the with 9/11
pile. Break for News
Tom Flocco
And certainly, the core being the heaviest part of the building, core columns
and beams were not going to fall very far from the foot-print of the tower. Democratic/Progressive News Sites,
So what happened to all the core columns? Buzzflash
The Raw Story
My guess is the missing columns and beams were vaporized by small Democratic Underground
nuclear bombs-- mini-nukes emplaced in the center of the core structure. I Progressive Independent
am open to other suggestions besides nukes, but nukes seems to be Think Progress
the best explanation currently. Citizens for a Legitimate Government
Common Dreams
Further, seeing how the core gets progressively stronger towards the Consortium News
bottom, and the huge difference in strength of the columns from top to Center for Cooperative Research
bottom, it is impossible for me to imagine that any gravity driven Cursor
Guerrilla News
collapse would completely tear apart the lower core down to its base
Online Journal
level. Thus, the lack of core columns helps to disprove the official
The Memory Hole
story by itself.
Press Action
News from Babylon
***It's possible that I missed counting a few columns/beams in the picture, Unknown News
but I can't see missing more than 20-50. It's probably true I missed a few TV News Lies
columns/beams that fell further and were off the bottom edge of the After Downing Street
picture-- though looking at other shots of ground zero, I can't have missed Eschaton
more than 20-50 large columns/beams. Even so, we're still talking about Daily Kos
over 750 large columns missing (and 2000 smaller columns and beams not Talking Points Memo
readily apparent either)!!! Hullabaloo
Billmon
Seriously, where are they? The Brad Blog
Jesus' General
The Rude Pundit
Because if these columns and beams can't be accounted for, it is yet
The Poor Man
another strong piece of evidence for nukes-- or some even more horrible
means of destruction.
Today in Iraq
Antiwar.com
posted by spooked @ 9:04 AM Iraq Coalition Casualties
Constant Pated
Clusterfuck Nation
Donkey Rising
Salon
<< Home
Slate
My Other Blogs
Al-CIA-duh
Ghost Plane
Flight 93 Hoax


Peak Oil and

Oil and Gas
The Oil Drum
Land of Black Gold
Richard Heinberg
Grist

Conspiracy Theory!
World Trade Center Demolition: Micro-Nukes in the WTC--Creating The China Syndrome: Important Matters of Completeness & Plausibility

Micro-Nukes in the WTC--Creating The China demolition.
Syndrome: Important Matters of Completeness &
Plausibility
About Me
My “Many Nukes” Hypothesis for the destruction of the WTC on 9/11,
perpetrated by the American regime, is detailed here The official 9/11 story is a lie. The 9/11 plane
wtcdemolition.blogspot.com. How this led to the China Syndrome is hijackings and crashes were clever hoaxes. The
detailed here wtc-chinasyndrome.blogspot.com. WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7 towers were brought
To summarize these matters now, I have written how the towers’ use of small nuclear bombs in the demolition of
destruction entailed numerous micro-nukes detonating in each tower, and WTC1 and 2. All in all, 9/11 was a massive and
furthermore much redundancy was employed to insure that sufficient cruel hoax foisted upon the world, done in order
numbers of these low-yield devices successfully went off as planned. Some to spark the obscene "war on terror", to cover up
of the redundant micro-nukes were impacted by the exploding micro- financial fraud and to further the ends of the
nukes, which allowed for the redundant ones’ fissile material to give rise to global elite. 9/11 was only the most egregious of
the China Syndrome. I also explained how some micro-nukes fizzled for several other recent false-flag terror operations.
various reasons--part of the reason for having so many redundant micro-
nukes present. I listed several factors that could have caused this fizzling,
even hypothesizing that the early explosions in the WTC7 were
fizzled nukes, that were meant to destroy WTC7 but they did not properly More 9/11 Links (Note: I present a wide
go critical. variety of 9/11 sites here for the
The reader can read how standard some of these concepts are in the you to judge their content.)
nuclear world. The military and “policy” makers use the term “fratricide” for
the occurrence of one nuclear warhead impacting/adversely affecting
General 9/11 Sites
another one and preventing the latter from going nuclear. Read here, for
9/11 Blimp
example. Under the heading of “Nuclear targeting and fratricide,” you will
9/11 Busters
find this: “Historically, analysts have assumed that only 2 nuclear warheads
9/11 CGI Watch
could be used in a short time frame against any target because of a
problem called “fratricide.” Assigning multiple warheads to a target requires 9/11 Complicity
precise timing to prevent one incoming warhead from destroying others. 9/11 Cover-Up
Furthermore, a nuclear detonation near ground level (which is ideal for 9/11 Dossier (UK)
destroying hardened silos) would create a debris cloud that could destroy
9/11 Encyclopedia
other warheads heading to the same target.”
9/11 Foreknowledge
Furthermore, long term storage of nuclear bombs or warheads involves 9/11 Hoax
another form of fratricide. This article on the many problems of long-term 9/11 Oddities
nuclear warhead storage, describes how nuclear warheads have
9/11 Overview
“vulnerability to fratricide neutrons,” as well as being susceptible to many
other problems that could make them fizzle. So you can see that I was 9/11 Plot
correct in writing that impacted and/or fizzled nukes, are problems that 9/11 Proof
could be expected to occur when you have a complicated scenario 9/11 Research (Jim Hoffman)
involving many small nukes going off in a relatively small place-- especially 9/11 Resources
in an enclosed space. And these matters thus could easily explain where 9/11 Review.org
the available fissile material to cause the China Syndrome at the WTC 9/11 Review.com
http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2008/09/micro-nukes-in-wtc-creating-china.html[07.11.2010 15:09:29]
came from. 9/11 Stealth

9/11 Strike
Now knowing of these potentially, fratricidal effects on the nukes to be 9/11 True Story
used in the WTC on 9/11, the American perps-- foul physicists, and 9/11 "U"
monstrous military men, much like those involved in nuking their own at 9/11 Verses
Port Chicago, and other innocent humans at Hiroshima and Nagasaki-- did Awoken Research Group
the following. 1. Emplaced many redundant nukes, in each WTC building, Thompson)
and at each level to be nuked. The levels where the nukes were emplaced Finnish 9/11 Site
took fratricidal effects into account, as much as possible. 2. Used Finnish 9/11 Site in English
(somewhat hardened) sensors that would trigger (sequentially, as needed) Gallerize
redundant nukes at each level that they were to be set off at. 3. Used German Engineers 9/11 site
sensors that themselves would be vaporized, if the first, planned nuke went Hybrideb's 9/11 site
off properly, so that the redundant ones would not go nuclear. Of course, Icelandic 9/11 site
their fissile material would then be available for the China Syndrome Jane Doe's 9/11 site
Aftermath. Did all this go off exactly as planned? No. As I have written, Juscogen's 9/11 site
the hidden, denied, early WTC7 explosions indicate that the perps failed to Killtown
properly set off the nukes in WTC7, and took five or more hours to re-do it,
later in the afternoon. One possible scenario for the failed, early nuking of
WTC7 could be the following. The early nukes in the lobby and basement
Let's Roll 9/11
fizzled (due to fratricidal or other effects). That is, they exploded but either Morgan Reynolds WTC Demolition
did not attain any criticality (only conventional explosions worked), or else Essay
the fissile material had been “weakened” and the resultant nuclear Morgan Reynolds 9/11 Commission
Essay
explosion was too small for demolition of WTC7 to occur. The sensor(s)
were themselves damaged (from partial explosions), and did not then
Nerdcities 9/11
trigger redundant nukes to go off, or else all redundant nukes fizzled, as Operation 9/11
Jennings (in the last article) describes several WTC7 explosions. Planet Quo 9/11
However even a properly functioning nuclear device going off inside a RINF 9/11 Archive
building can lead to its own China Syndrome, as follows. Let us look at the Terrorize (Danish 911 site)
efficiency of nuclear devices historically, as I do not have access to data on The Mysteries of 9/11
the efficiency of the most current nukes. But it would likely be in the same THE TRUTH ABOUT SEPT 11 (Compiled
by Gerard Holmgren)
range. The efficiency of a nuclear bomb is the percentage of its total
Shunned
available fissile material (such as Uranium-235 or Plutonium-239) that
Physics 911
actually undergoes fission during the criticality stage of
Physics 9/11.co.nr
implosion/explosion-- roughly one microsecond. The remainder is still Plague Puppy's Cafe
highly radioactive and could give rise to a China Syndrome under certain Plague Puppy: Alternate Site
conditions. Peter Vogel’s book, “The Last Wave From Port Question 911
Chicago" describes on page 13-13 how the Hiroshima “A-Bomb” used Truth 911
only 1.14% of its contained fissile material. The Port Chicago type A-Bomb Brad's 911 site
had even less efficiency-- about 0.5%. More recently, 6% efficiency for Club Ivy's 911 site
updated nuclear bombs is cited here. Such a low efficiency is due to the Brad's old 9/11 site
immense difficulty of having an implosion, and then an explosion, whereby Flamesong 9/11 Essay and Links
the fissile material has only one microsecond before the imploding, Serendipity (various essays on 9/11)
fissioning U-235 critical mass with its tremendous number of released Stop the Lie 9/11
neutrons and subsequent energy release (and great heat and pressure), The Strange Images of 9/11/2001
forces the critical mass to explode outward thus terminating its criticality Total 9/11 Info
geometry.
Questions Questions
The Web Fairy
What this means is that even a properly functioning, fission bomb will have
Wing TV
94-99% of its highly radioactive, fissile material released into the
environment where it will more slowly continue to fission and decay-- and
release great heat. Now if a nuclear bomb goes off several thousand feet in 9/11 Activism
the air, a la Hiroshima, the unfissioned U-235 will be widely dispersed and 9/11 Blogger
will come down over a huge area. (The heat of the Bomb would even have 9/11 Citizens' Watch
vaporized the unfissioned U-235, but this will later condense and come 9/11 Skeptics Unite!
down somewhere.) But the micro-nukes--even the properly fissioning ones 911 Truth.org
used inside the WTC-- were, at least partially, contained during the 911 Truth LA.us
destruction. But as the buildings were being destroyed, even vaporized, the 911 Truth LA.org
911 Truth Emergence
remaining fissile material would be able to reach all around the WTC area,
911 We Know
and some would likely reach significantly beyond as well. Some fissile
material from the sub-basement nukes, would likely be trapped in the
largest concentrations, to be found in the aftermath, in these basement 9-11 UK
areas. These radioactive fragments would also be inaccessible to the usual 9/11 Family Steering Committee
radiation-lowering mechanisms that were extensively employed beginning NY 9/11 Truth
the very next day-- water hosing, and “coating” with sand/earth.

To sum up, my “Many Nukes” and resultant China Syndrome Hypothesis, is Community Currency 9/11
well supported by the known concepts of nuclear warhead fratricide, and Summer of Truth
the low (0.5-6.0%) efficiency of fission bombs. Indeed all the facts involving Proposition 911
exploding numerous micro-nukes in an enclosed (or partially enclosed) Reopen 911
space appears to make the China Syndrome aftermath not only plausible, Deception Dollars
but inevitable! Justice for 9/11
posted by spooked @ 6:47 AM 9/11 Specialty Sites

Team 8 Plus
Flight 93 Hoax
WTC Demolition
<< Home
9/11 Photo Analysis
WTC
collapse
Flight 77 FOIA site
Flight 93 Crash.com
Pentagon Research
9/11 Flash Movies

Buddy Buddy
Pentagon Strike
911 Questions

that question 9/11
Rigorous Intuition
Wing TV
Xymphora
Killtown's Blog
George Washington
Propaganda Matrix
Daniel Hopsicker
Cryptome
World Order News
Good Intro Books to

Griffin
Ray Griffin
Ian Henshall
Webster G. Tarpley
Thompson

Ruppert
Hopsicker

Arctic Beacon

with 9/11
Break for News
Tom Flocco

Buzzflash
The Raw Story
Think Progress
Common Dreams
Consortium News
Cursor
Guerrilla News
Online Journal
The Memory Hole
Press Action
News from Babylon
Unknown News
TV News Lies
Eschaton
Daily Kos
Talking Points Memo
Hullabaloo
Billmon
The Brad Blog
Jesus' General
The Rude Pundit
The Poor Man
Today in Iraq
Antiwar.com
Constant Pated
Clusterfuck Nation
Donkey Rising
Salon
Slate
My Other Blogs
Al-CIA-duh
Ghost Plane
Flight 93 Hoax


Peak Oil and

Oil and Gas
The Oil Drum
Land of Black Gold
Richard Heinberg
Grist

Conspiracy Theory!
World Trade Center Demolition: Did Two Nuclear Reactors, not Nuclear Bombs, Destroy the WTC on 9/11?

Did Two Nuclear Reactors, not Nuclear Bombs, demolition.
Destroy the WTC on 9/11?
Review of William Tahil’s Book, “Ground Zero: The Nuclear About Me

Demolition of the WTC”, and of his Reactor Hypothesis Name: spooked
Tahil’s book is now downloadable for free here: WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7 towers were brought
http://www.nucleardemolition.com. I welcome Tahil’s comments down by demolition, and there is evidence for the
and corrections, if any, to this review and analysis of his work, via email to use of small nuclear bombs in the demolition of
Spooked, who will forward to me. Tahil was one of the very first to write WTC1 and 2. All in all, 9/11 was a massive and
and publish on the nuclear demolition of the WTC on 9/11. Also, other than cruel hoax foisted upon the world, done in order
myself, he is the only other scientist, or person, to write about the China to spark the obscene "war on terror", to cover up
Syndrome aftermath. As my illness prevented me from writing on 9/11 until financial fraud and to further the ends of the
2007, his 2006 book was the first to correctly attribute the great heat and global elite. 9/11 was only the most egregious of
molten metal that existed at the WTC for months afterwards, to the China several other recent false-flag terror operations.
Syndrome of still-fissioning material. While I discovered that independently,
he was the first to demonstrate this in public writing. He deserves much View my complete profile
credit for this. The Finnish military expert, Tahil, and myself, are the
three people who have written proposed nuclear demolition schemes. My More 9/11 Links (Note: I present a wide
articles on the nuclear destruction of the WTC are here variety of 9/11 sites here for the
http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com and my articles on the China purposes of diversity. I leave it up to
Syndrome are here http://wtc-chinasyndrome.blogspot.com. The you to judge their content.)
Finn believes a single nuclear bomb was used on each tower, via a
focused, nuclear shape charge in the basement. I have stated that
numerous mini- or micro-nukes were employed in the towers, and in all the General 9/11 Sites
other WTC buildings. I have further highlighted that great redundancy was 9/11 Blimp
employed, and that numerous nukes either were sabotaged, fizzled on 9/11 Busters
their own, or were impacted (without being triggered themselves), by other 9/11 CGI Watch
exploding nukes. And so many nukes did not go off as planned, and their
9/11 Complicity
unused fissile material later gave rise to the China Syndrome. My article on
9/11 Cover-Up
the early attempted nuking of WTC7, which failed, is good evidence
9/11 Dossier (UK)
of fizzled, or sabotaged nukes. Thus there were many nukes available,
whose fissile material was not employed in the destruction, and which gave 9/11 Encyclopedia
rise to the China Syndrome, in my hypothesis. Please read all my articles, 9/11 Foreknowledge
including the one on "fratricided" nukes here. 9/11 Hoax
9/11 Oddities
Now Tahil is unique among the nuclear 9/11 proponents, in that he alone
believes that two nuclear reactors-- not nuclear bombs-- were employed to 9/11 Overview
demolish the two towers. While my 9/11 nuclear scenario is different from
9/11 Plot
Tahil’s, and I have explained in lesser detail before why I think mine is
9/11 Proof
correct, and his is incorrect, I have always stated (and still do) that his work
should be read by all, as I could be wrong, and he could be right, or 9/11 Resources
possibly there are elements of truth, where we may both be right. Looking 9/11 Review.org
at the different nuclear 9/11 scenarios, the Finn, and I, believe the evidence 9/11 Review.com
points to nuclear bombs. The Finn believes a single, fission-free, 4th
http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2008/09/did-two-nuclear-reactors-not-nuclear.html[07.11.2010 15:10:11]
9/11 Stealth
generation thermonuclear device destroyed each tower. This is based on 9/11 Strike
the govt’s Tritium finding. Tahil does not mention the Tritium evidence, and 9/11 True Story
goes with pure fission at the WTC. I have written several things 9/11 "U"
chronologically as the evidence, and my thinking evolved. First I went with 9/11 Verses
both sets of evidence, namely that either fusion (tritium) enhanced fission Awoken Research Group
bombs, or a fission-triggered fusion bombs, were employed. Later I noted Complete 9/11 Timeline (Paul
Thompson)
the way the regime has total control of all scientific data, and could block Finnish 9/11 Site
release of the most damning data. I stated that it is possible that the Tritium Finnish 9/11 Site in English
finding was a red herring to divert people into looking for the fission-less Gallerize
fusion bomb, precisely because this would stop people from realizing there German Engineers 9/11 site
was a "China Syndrome" aftermath, at the WTC-- which the regime wishes Hybrideb's 9/11 site
to hide at all costs. (Presumably only fission can yield the China Icelandic 9/11 site
Syndrome.) So I have stated it is possible that all nukes employed on 9/11 Jane Doe's 9/11 site
were fission bombs, and the tritium data is spurious. Juscogen's 9/11 site
Killtown
One of the nuclear 9/11 proponents, William Deagle, M.D., further lends Oil and Empire 9/11 (Mark Robinowitz)
support to my redundant nuclear bomb hypothesis with his direct Portland Indy Media 9/11
knowledge of a Fort Collins U.S. Army Forensics Team 119 Questions about 9/11
Let's Roll 9/11
member who was immediately sent in to the OKC bombing
site in 1995. This man told Deagle (his physician) directly, that he and Essay
the team brought out two unexploded micro-nuclear bombs, and one Morgan Reynolds 9/11 Commission
unexploded C4 pineapple bomb, from the 10-story Murrah building, after its Essay
destruction. This Army man said that the nukes were emplaced by ATF Missile Gate (analysis of 1st hit)
Nerdcities 9/11
and FBI personnel. He further stated that his Army team was under armed
Operation 9/11
supervision by Wackenhut guards, who tested that they did not remove any
Planet Quo 9/11
radioactive evidence. We can see from this, that great redundancy (extra
nuclear bomb emplacement) was employed at OKC. Remember that RINF 9/11 Archive
Murrah was only 10 stories tall, and nowhere near as wide as the towers or Terrorize (Danish 911 site)
WTC7. Consider the total volume of the WTC towers, the 47 story WTC7, The Mysteries of 9/11
and all the other buildings, and you can see how dozens of redundant THE TRUTH ABOUT SEPT 11 (Compiled
nukes may have been employed in the nuclear destruction of the entire by Gerard Holmgren)
WTC. If the matter is linear, given the relative volumes, we might even Shunned
conclude that 50-100 micro-nukes were emplaced, and they gave rise to Physics 911
Physics 9/11.co.nr
the China Syndrome, in my hypothesis.
Plague Puppy's Cafe
For now, let’s examine what Tahil has to say particularly on the subjects of
Question 911
his nuclear reactor hypothesis, and the China Syndrome aftermath. Much Truth 911
of Tahil’s hypothesis rests on his interpretation of the U.S. Geological Brad's 911 site
Survey (USGS) Dust Analysis data here. Tahil seems to view the USGS Club Ivy's 911 site
data, and all govt data/studies at face value. He does not seem to realize Brad's old 9/11 site
the possibility, or likelihood, that errors of omission, or commission, were Flamesong 9/11 Essay and Links
utilized in various Gov’t studies, whereas I have highlighted this in my Serendipity (various essays on 9/11)
articles. Tahil particularly mocks those who state that the Seismic records Stop the Lie 9/11
were doctored-- which includes me. I base my view on several things, The Strange Images of 9/11/2001
including eyewitness testimony of those at Ground Zero, and a friend who Total 9/11 Info
lived a mile north, and who described books falling off shelves, at the Unanswered Questions
moment of the first CGI “plane hit,”-- or WTC1 basement (nuclear) Questions Questions
explosion. Also we know that the Gov’t actually asked one Seismic Lab to The Web Fairy
Wing TV
“re-do” their calculations.
Let’s get back to the USGS dust study that Tahil uses for much of his 9/11 Activism
hypothesis. I have stated that this study is heavily flawed in many ways. 9/11 Blogger
Some of my criticisms, I will now list: 9/11 Citizens' Watch
-- Did not test for (or report findings on) Plutonium. 911 Truth.org
911 Truth LA.us
-- Did not look for anything smaller than 2.5 microns, or did not delineate 911 Truth LA.org
this, when labs had, for years prior, equipment that would have quantified 911 Truth Emergence
dust down to 10 nanometer size. 911 We Know
-- Only looked at a small area, mostly within 0.5 Km from the towers, when
9-11 UK
the dust settled much further away, and
NY 9/11 Truth
-- A good deal of the dust went up in smoke! Thus the smallest particles

ended up far away. See my articles again. Scholars for 9/11 Truth
-- Samples were taken 5-6 days later, after a rain/wind storm on day 2. Summer of Truth
Proposition 911
-- Did not differentiate differing isotopes of a given element. (Differing Reopen 911
isotopes have the same number of protons, but differing numbers of Deception Dollars
neutrons in their nuclei. Isotopes behave very differently regarding nuclear Justice for 9/11
processes including radiation release, and further fissioning.)

I have highlighted the reason the regime prevented, or perhaps more likely
Team 8 Plus
ALTERED the data on the smallest sized dust particles. It requires far
Flight 93 Hoax
greater energy (only nukes) to create the tiniest dust particle size. WTC Demolition
Now Tahil concentrates on the USGS dust study, and in particular its 9/11 Photo Analysis
findings regarding the elements Strontium, Barium, Zinc, and several Evidence of Explosives on 9/11
others. He uses the 12-- out of 35-- sample sites that yielded Strontium. He Demolition, the Truth of 9/11 and the
has made some very good findings regarding the near total correlation of WTC
Strontium and Barium in the dust samples. This shows a common origin, collapse
he asserts, and is likely right. This, he says virtually proves fission occurred WTC Streaking Object, WTC7 theories
as Strontium and Barium are two common “daughter” elements in the Flight 77 FOIA site
fissioning of Uranium. This is likely correct as well. But he also states Flight 93 Crash.com
several things that are not correct. He makes these mistakes throughout Pentagon Research
the book. He only considers the buildings’ concrete or steel as sources of Brad's Pentagon Analysis
the dust. This is a serious flaw. The buildings’ entire contents-- from people Where Is Osama (The Osama Clock)
to furniture, etc., etc.-- must be considered! He also at times, assumes one
particular isotope for an element, e.g. Strontium 90, and not its other four
9/11 Flash Movies
naturally occurring isotopes, and its other 15 artificially created isotopes.
Buddy Buddy
On page 24, Tahil states, “These elements [Barium and Strontium] simply Pentagon Strike
should not be present in building rubble or building materials in even a valid 911 Questions
trace amount, which would be less than 10 ppm…” In succeeding pages,
he elaborates that very high levels of Strontium and Barium in the dust
study could only have come from the fissile Uranium in two nuclear Reasonably reliable "Conspiracy Sites"
reactors, very deep underneath the two towers. But, we shall see that that question 9/11
Strontium, Barium, and Zinc are NOT to be unexpectedly found in the Rigorous Intuition
vaporized rubble, as Tahil states. Thus their source need not be from Wing TV
massive amounts of fissioned Uranium, as Tahil claims. There are many Xymphora
common, known sources of Strontium. A Strontium compound can make Killtown's Blog
up as much as 10% of the mass in toothpaste for “sensitive teeth.”
Strontium is a normal component of everyone’s bones and teeth. And Tahil
George Washington
does not take into account the total vaporization of half of the nearly 3000
human victims, and partial vaporization of the others. Other Strontium Prison Planet (Alex Jones)
sources include pottery, color TVs, aerosol paints, drugs for osteoporosis, Daily Two Minutes of Hate
and other sources. However there is one source of Strontium that has The Emperor's New Clothes
overarching importance here. Public Action (Carol Valentine)
Propaganda Matrix
Tahil ignores the fact that Strontium occurs in Limestone. And Limestone is Daniel Hopsicker
often the major component of concrete. How much Strontium might there Cryptome
be in the 100,000 tons of concrete in each WTC tower? Let us look at one Crimes and Corruptions of the New
World Order News
type of limestone called oolite limestone.
Strontium in oolitic limestone can occur at up to 10,800 ppm (parts per

million)! This study found a range from 230 to 10,800, with an average of Good Intro Books to
414 ppm. But is oolitic limestone used in very large structures? Some of Alternative 9/11 Truth
the largest buildings ever built have indeed used oolitic limestone. This
includes the Empire State Building and the Pentagon! Questions About the Bush
Griffin
Then there is the issue of Barium. Wiki notes that Barium is a "getter" in "The 9/11 Commission Report:
vacuum tubes, is used in glassmaking, and is used in a coating for the Omissions And Distortions" by David
Ray Griffin
electrodes in the ubiquitous fluorescent lamps. Furthermore, Wiki says,
“Lithopone, a pigment that contains Barium Sulfate and Zinc Sulfide, is a Ian Henshall
permanent white that has good covering power…” Here wiki indicates that "9/11 Synthetic Terror, Made in USA" by
Lithopone may be commonly “used in interior paints and in some enamels.” Webster G. Tarpley
Thus we see that if this pigment was used in the WTC, we have a Thompson
Barium/Zinc linkage, without resorting to Uranium fission. But on page 30, "Crossing the Rubicon" by Michael C.
Tahil shows that if one sample site were left out, Barium and Zinc have Ruppert
nearly a 100% (96%) correlation. Tahil speculates that this correlation "Welcome to Terrorland" by Daniel
Hopsicker
could only be from nuclear fission, and in particular, lesser known “ternary
fission.” He might be right, but you see from my Lithopene example, this
one correlation could be explained without fission. The Lithopene example "Conspiracy Sites" that deal with 9/11
does not disprove fission, but it shows that any one of these correlations is that I have significant issues with
not conclusive of anything. They have limitations. What Really Happened
Also Barium, some analysts assert, is one of the main ingredients in Arctic Beacon
the ubiquitous, and notorious, Chemtrails. These trails have been seen in
the skies for the last 15 years or more. As they stay up for great lengths of
time, they may be nanoparticles. It’s even possible that by now, their
with 9/11
contents have mixed with the atmosphere, and the entire Earth has been Break for News
saturated with their contents. Of course, ongoing regions getting this Tom Flocco
“treatment” will have very high doses for some time. The Hair Mineral
Analysis, done on people, has shown a great increase in the levels of
Barium, over the last 10 years. This means that some Barium compound Democratic/Progressive News Sites,
has gotten into people. Regarding the USGS dust samples, the relatively Blogs and Miscellaneous Links
large percentage of Barium, in the USGS study, could even have come Buzzflash
from the vaporized people, or from significant mixing of the WTC dust with The Raw Story
atmospheric Barium, or from some local Chemtrail spraying within the 5-6 Democratic Underground
days of the WTC destruction, before the samples were collected. If the Progressive Independent
Think Progress
Barium were ubiquitous, say from the atmosphere--and its adherence to
the smoke from the WTC, the WTC dust might come down with much
Common Dreams
Barium in it. Thus there may have been a significant base level of both
Consortium News
Strontium and Barium from common, non-nuclear sources. Center for Cooperative Research
Cursor
Zinc is also cited on page 143 when Tahil extrapolates and concludes that Guerrilla News
a massive amount of Uranium was fissioned on 9/11-- from two reactors. Online Journal
But Zinc is also not rare, as Tahil claims. Zinc is the major metal in pennies The Memory Hole
and is in batteries, steel, paint pigments, and many other sources. Information Clearing House
Press Action
But again Tahil may be right, because I have not proven that Lithopene News from Babylon
was used at the WTC, unless it is/was ubiquitous. Nor have I proven what Unknown News
the level of Strontium in the limestone in the concrete was. However, TV News Lies
Tahil’s body of evidence, in this book, which includes several correlations After Downing Street
of daughter products of fission, his analysis of the dust from the girders Eschaton
Daily Kos
whereby Tahil concludes that elements were blasted onto the girders, and
Talking Points Memo
were still fissioning when collected on the girders, and all his other findings,
Hullabaloo
indicate that there was fission in the WTC on 9/11/01. But the amount of
Billmon
fissioned Uranium is impossible to find by extrapolation of the dust, The Brad Blog
because the amounts of Strontium, Barium and Zinc may have been large, Jesus' General
in the WTC, as I have shown above. But thanks to Tahil, we can conclude The Rude Pundit
that the search for the “holy grail” of fission-free fusion (as the Finnish The Poor Man
Military Expert has done), is likely a fruitless hangout, or red herring, and Juan Cole (Informed Comment)
should be abandoned. The proof of the fission is in the China Syndrome, Today in Iraq
and the sum of the findings in Tahil’s book. More strongly put, be wary of Antiwar.com
any alleged Nuclear-9/11 proponents who do not proclaim the China Iraq Coalition Casualties
Syndrome Aftermath of 9/11! There are only four proponents of the China Constant Pated
Syndrome: Tahil, myself (the “Anonymous Physicist”), Spooked, and Clusterfuck Nation
recently Deagle. Donkey Rising
Salon
Slate
The following is the crux of Tahil’s nuclear reactor hypothesis. On pages
144-145, Tahil claims that there were massive amounts of Strontium and
Zinc as radioactive fallout, and that then indicates there was a massive My Other Blogs
amount of Uranium (nearly 500 tons) that had fissioned. And then that this Humint Events Online
claim of nearly 500 tons of fissioned Uranium implies to him that only a THE WORST PRESIDENT EVER!!!!
reactor or two could have been the source of the Uranium. All this rests on Bush Administration War Criminals
the USGS dust study, and Tahil’s extrapolations of its data. Now while I Fake Opposition Democrats
think his earlier near 100% correlation of Strontium and Barium, goes a Al-CIA-duh
long way toward proving nuclear fission occurred on 9/11, his calculations Ghost Plane
leading to 500 tons of Uranium-- and subsequent hypothesis that implies Flight 93 Hoax
two massive reactors were sent critical is flawed. On page 144, Tahil-- via
extrapolation of the amounts of these elements in the USGS dust study--
arrives at the estimates of 60 tons of Strontium and 100 tons of Zinc, per
tower, in the fallout from the destruction of the WTC. From this, he further
estimates that there must have been at least 470 tons of Uranium in each
of two reactors deep underground in each tower, that was somehow sent
critical, and exploded in nuclear fashion, and caused the destruction of
each tower, and gave rise to the China Syndrome. While I, of course,
agree with him that the HEAT GENERATION, of up to six months, at the
WTC, leaves only the possibility of a China Syndrome, his assumptions
and math need scrutiny.
1. I have already pointed out that the USGS is greatly flawed, and likely
doctored with numerous errors of omission and commission. See above.
2. He apparently assumes all the Strontium was Strontium 90, and ignores
the other isotopes of Strontium, while the USGS study did not differentiate
isotopes.
3. He assumes the origin of daughter elements is Uranium, when they

could have been fissioned from Plutonium, which was not tested for by the
USGS--or else not published
4. He ignores non-nuclear sources for Strontium and Zinc, and assumes

all Strontium and Zinc came from nuclear fission. See above where I have
strongly disproved this.

So for all these reasons, we arrive at the conclusion that we cannot use
the USGS data for a simple weight ratio analysis. Furthermore, Tahil
compares his nuclear reactor hypothesis to only one micro-nuclear bomb
per tower, and ignores the possibility/probability that
1. Many mini- or micro-nukes were used per tower CNN infiltrated by US Army Psy-ops
2. That the other buildings also were nuked The American Taliban
3. He incorrectly says that a fission nuke has all of its Uranium used up in
Peak Oil and
its use. This is very curious since he cites Peter Vogel’s book, "The Last
Wave From Port Chicago." And this book is one source that describes the
efficiency of a fission bomb. On page 13-13 Vogel writes that the Oil and Gas
Hiroshima Atomic Bomb used only 1.14% of its contained fissile material. The Oil Drum
More recently, 6% efficiency for updated nuclear bombs is cited here. This Land of Black Gold
means that instead of 100% of the U-235 being used up when it goes Flying Talking Donkey
critical in a bomb, only 1-6% is used up, and thus 94-99% of its U-235 is Life After the Oil Crash
left over for the China Syndrome! Richard Heinberg
Grist
4. Tahil does not realize other possibilities that I have made original
hypotheses on; namely that many redundant nukes were also likely The Official 9/11 Story IS a
emplaced. And some, or many, of these may have been either sabotaged Conspiracy Theory!
or fizzled because of various reasons.
5. The actual tower destruction scenario observed, fits the use of numerous 9/11 narrative, as codified by the 9/11
small nukes much better than a deep underground set of two massive likely explanation for the events of 9/11/01. The
reactors. official 9/11 story is therefore a theory. This
6. Officially physicists have claimed that a fission reactor cannot
even yield a nuclear explosion. (However, we must take this with a
small grain of salt. If a nuclear reactor could yield a full nuclear explosion,
like a fission bomb, the PTB would never let this be known.) I have no fondness for any religion, as I think it
So from this last list, it is clear that not one, but numerous nukes per tower much as I detest the true perpetrators of 9/11.
could have been employed, and the scenarios I have described, could patsies in 9/11, as part of a highly organized
have led to a large amount of still-fissioning Uranium or Plutonium covert operation by a group affiliated with the US
fragments, “left” (after WTC destruction) both near the surface, and deep
underground.
Now we must analyze the geometry and dynamics of the WTC destruction,
to see what fits better: the use of a deep underground nuclear reactor per
tower, or numerous small nukes. One problem is the early sub-basement
explosions that were timed to go off at the same time as the alleged “plane
hits” way above. I have written extensively and cited much evidence, that
these were nuclear devices that were exploded and even that EMPs
(Electromagnetic Pulses) were yielded at those times. Tahil agrees that
these explosions were nuclear. He cites an article that I have cited
numerous times written by WTC Engineer Mike Pecoraro. Pecoraro was
below the sub-basement C level (presumably at the D level, but not
described explicitly), when his colleague saw “flickering lights” (EMP?) and
they ascended to the C level. He says, "There was nothing there but
rubble, we're talking about a 50 ton hydraulic press gone!" Pecoraro and a
co-worker then “made their way to the parking garage, but found that it,
too, was gone…” As they then ascended to the B Level, one floor above,
they “were astonished to see a steel and concrete fire door that weighed
about 300 pounds, wrinkled up like a piece of aluminum foil" and lying on
the floor. Now I have asserted, the only thing that could have done these
things is neutron bombardment and/or million-degree temperatures, both
from a nuke. Tahil says his nuclear reactors were well below the seven
known sub-basement levels of the towers. And the reactors were sent
critical at WTC destruct time. But he also says he believes the earlier
“Pecoraro explosion” was nuclear.
Thus we have several problems with the nuclear reactor hypothesis:
1. How does a reactor go critical for the earlier Pecoraro basement,

nuclear explosion, and still be capable of being used again--in any
coherent fashion? And the destruction of the towers was very well
controlled.
2. In this light, how can any reactor being melted down, and going critical,
be used in such a controlled, coherent, relatively precise and symmetrical
fashion, so many floors below what it is to destroy, when a reactor gone
critical implies much chaos? As opposed to numerous, strategically placed
small nukes.
3. How can Pecoraro have survived a nuclear explosion from a reactor

below his level (and not know that that was what happened), and then go
above him to two floors that were nuked? Unless small nuclear bomb(s)
were utilized at those levels.
4. Now I can see how the observed deep underground flowing metal,
weeks and months later, might possibly be from this deep underground
reactor, but what about the hot rubble pile and its fissioning material not far
from the surface?
5. What about the possibility of breaking through to the Hudson (if not
directly underneath, then just a bit West of the WTC) if the reactor were so
far down, and made to explode, nuclear-wise?
My “Many Nukes” hypothesis, which includes my “Many Nukes

fizzled/sabotaged/impacted/fratricided” hypothesis, that I have authored--
remember the Finn said only one nuke per tower, which thus has some of
these same flaws-- seems to fit all that happened to the WTC, on 9/11,
better. Numerous redundant, fizzled or sabotaged nukes, higher up may
have given rise to the large hot rubble pile. Larger nukes in the sub-
basement gave rise to the flowing molten metal seen there months later.
There may have been many nukes emplaced in the sub-basement that led
to events that appear “reactor-like.” Why compare a reactor only to one
nuke? And given that only 1-6% of a fission nuke’s fissile material is used
in its explosion, and there were many nukes that did go off, this too allows
for a China Syndrome at the WTC, even if there were not any redundant
nukes present.
There are numerous other matters that are incorrect. On page 153, Tahil
virtually states that Chernobyl was a nuclear explosion when it was not. It
resulted from heat from nuclear fission causing steam expansion, which
caused an explosion and the China Syndrome of blasted radioactive
fragments releasing great heat where they landed. Earlier in the book, he
has it right, that Chernobyl was not a nuclear explosion, but not on page
153. Tahil apparently believes that the “Plane hits” were real, instead of the
impossible CGI, they clearly are. He believes that the earlier 1993 WTC
explosion was conventional, when I have highlighted the eyewitness
testimony of engineer Phil Schneider who said he saw proof that it was
nuclear-- I guess things like Pecoraro described. (See my articles.) Tahil
often cites new, or hypothesized Physics for some of the phenomena, when
this is precarious at best, and makes it look like the ludicrous DEW
hangout. E.g., he states that Koenig’s sphere was involved in the WTC
destruction as a “neutron reflector/focuser”. After seeing the
documentary on Koenig’s sphere, and its maker, and its creation,
and how it was moved, and is still there in a nearby public park, I seriously
doubt this speculation, if not also on Physics grounds. His website cites a
sewer steam explosion in NYC, miles North of WTC, several years after
9/11, as some proof of a massive nuclear reactor underneath Manhattan.
But NYC has had such stream explosions for 150 years.
Tahil seems to want to think there were massive neutron fluxes all about
the WTC during or after the destruction. He states that the strangely
damaged cars are proof of large neutron fluxes at those spots. But I have
amply demonstrated that the evidence fits EMPs, vastly better than
anything else. These are the cars whose boundaries of doors caused only
part of the car to have heated up, and caught fire. In my analysis of this, I
revealed how only an EMP would cause part of a car to intercept the EMP,
which becomes current, and then great heat. But this is only in metal, and
the boundaries (air), between car doors, prevents said current from flowing
across to the other car door. See especially my analyses of EMT Ondrovic’
experience of EMP causing a car door to explode onto her, and the
flickering lights in WTC6, before it was nuked. Neutron fluxes would NOT
have caused this, as neutron fluxes would not show a distinction with car
door boundaries, as we see with several cars! So Tahil appears to try too
hard to see neutrons all about, because he wants to fit this to massive
reactors under the WTC, and that area of Manhattan.
I think his analysis of his Figure 52, on Page 123, is incorrect. This is not
quite like a volcano. Look at the height of the smoke at top, compared to
the height of the other extant tower. It has not shot way into the sky yet.
Rather it shows that the top part of WTC1 was vaporized. So this could
have been from a nuke at the top to start things off. He has, or had, some
connection to Alex Jones. His website had said that if you can’t reach him
via email, it was NSA interference, and to contact Alex Jones. I have no
problem with the NSA inference, but Alex Jones? He has been vehemently
anti-nuclear-911, and anti-NPT (the planes were merely CGI). Jones would
never have Tahil’s work on his site. Jones was sent in to head the 911truth
movement, after the regime assassinated true conspiracy expert Bill
Cooper, within two months of 9/11. Why does/did a Nuclear-9/11 proponent
have an anti-nuclear-911 person be his contact?
On the other hand, numerous things Tahil says are very intelligent and
revealing, even bold. First credit goes to him for his finding of near 100%
correlation between Strontium and Barium, on page 26. This indicates
nuclear fission occurred at the WTC, but is not proof. His ignoring the
Tritium finding may ultimately prove to be both bold and wise. While others,
like the Finnish military expert, considered only a pure fusion bomb, this
then could not have given rise to the China Syndrome of which the HEAT
GENERATION evidence is massive and conclusive. I wrote that the Tritium
finding-- or more correctly, its release may have been a red herring to get
people to look only for nuclear devices that could not have caused the
China Syndrome. So Tahil as I indicated, may be both bold and brilliant
here. Tahil also reveals, on page 115, evidence of birth defects after 9/11,
in NYC, that I have not seen before.
His motto on the cover is also good: Salus populi suprema lex esti or "The
welfare of the people shall be the supreme law." Tahil, of course, asserts
that the American regime has the opposite view. He asserts that there was
massive radiation, at the WTC, and he makes the bold assertion that
Manhattan should still be evacuated! If he is right, how many American
cities may have reactors placed underneath them? Now I still think that if
this is the goal--and it wouldn’t surprise me if you have read my “Ultimate
Truths” series (anonymous-physicist.blogspot.com)--they could
more easily just place nuclear bombs underneath edifices in big cities.
Sadly, for reasons my readers may know, I think there is a fair possibility
that this could be the case, as above-ground nukes are more easily gauged
and intercepted by OTHERS. The Rockefeller owned or controlled WTC
land area is far from their only land ownership in this country. Could the
Rockefeller-donated United Nations land be next? In this light, and in
cohesion with what I wrote above about the OKC bombing, I ask did a
China Syndrome result there, if it was nuked? Deagle says his Army
agent/patient said that Wackenhut guards measured and prevented
anything radioactive from being removed. I trust that means that the
regime’s agents removed all things radioactive. How many cancers have
there been in OKC responders, or OKC residents, subsequently? How
many more buildings or skyscrapers must be nuked before
the People wake up?
Then Tahil’s analysis of this photo also appears to be very astute, as far
as demonstrating the PTB’s desire to hide the China Syndrome. The photo
is of the so-called Light Memorial. This was the extremely bright, double-
blue lights, that were turned on for weeks, a few months after 9/11, from
dusk to 11 P.M. Tahil surmises that this began when they finally reached
the reactor remnant areas, or large areas of fissioning Uranium. And while
they were doing something to it, or carting it away, its blue light of the
Cherenkov radiation (from nuclear fission) would have been visible. I have
written about this in regards to one photo that Steven Jones “orange-ified,”
when responders were peering into something underground at the WTC. I
related this to the blue light seen when nuclear fissioning elements (cored
out sphere and cylindrical insert) were erroneously kept together for too
long a time, during the “tickling the dragon’s tail experiments,” at Los
Alamos, that killed two nuclear scientists. Tahil asserts that the reactor
remnant was uncovered at that time, so they needed to do the light trick. I
would say that large areas of fissioning fragments must have been
uncovered, for them to do this. But need it have been a reactor, or its
remnants? There could have been many nuclear bombs in the sub-
basement area that led to a large area, with much fissioning going on. But
perhaps this is one item of evidence where his reactor hypothesis may fit
better than my many nukes hypotheses. Or could a much smaller reactor
have been there, and elements of both hypotheses be true? The blue lights
are strictly not proof of anything, we must remember. But this regime does
almost everything it does, for a sinister reason. Another photo Tahil
uniquely has (page 101) is that of a rescue dog with his responder master
walking the WTC grounds. Even the dog is wearing protective boots
because of the great heat there and then! Also on page 101, Tahil has a
photo of the large congealed mass of bullets from WTC6. He states that 43
days after 9/11 the heat was still so intense, an injury to the face of a
responder occurred when at least one of the bullets in the mass
discharged. Here is more proof of this great heat weeks and months after
9/11, which the intel agents for “DEW” and the O.C.T. laughably continue
to deny.
Thus I conclude this review of Tahil’s book and hypothesis with the
following. Tahil deserves much credit for his statistical analysis chapter,
which helps demonstrate the likelihood that nuclear fission took place on
9/11 at the WTC, and for first exposing the existence of the China
Syndrome at the WTC. His hypothesis that this had to be from two
massive, deep underground nuclear fission reactors that were sent critical,
and exploded akin to a nuclear fission bomb, is much less compelling, and
more evidence fits my “many nukes” hypothesis, with possibly one
evidentiary exception. Therefore it is possible that he may still be right, at
least in part. For that reason, and other things cited above, I recommend
everyone who is not an intel agent, and wishes to know what might have
occurred on 9/11, read his book, as well as all my articles. The case for two
huge reactors that were made to undergo nuclear explosions has not been
made. Neither can we completely rule out that the China Syndrome that
existed at the WTC for several months after 9/11/01 was, in part, from a
much smaller reactor present. I am not saying I believe this, but that it
cannot be excluded. Furthermore, I can even perceive one reason why it
would have been there. A breeder reactor could even have produced the
fissile material for the coming nuclear bomb destruction of the WTC. Or
there could have been both many micro-nukes used, and a fission reactor
was also exploded with a micro-nuke at the end. I throw these ideas out for
completeness. In conclusion I remain unconvinced that the evidence
indicates a large nuclear fission reactor was underneath each of the
towers, and suffered a nuclear explosion, as my “Many Nukes” hypothesis
appears to better explain the details of the WTC destruction, and the China
Syndrome aftermath. I welcome feedback and genuine criticism from Tahil
on this review, or of my own nuclear-911 hypotheses, and also the same
from any non-intel agent. As Tahil wrote, Salus populi suprema lex esti.
<< Home
World Trade Center Demolition: The Effect of a Low Yield Nuke on a Steel Structure

Saturday, March 28, 2009 trade center buildings 1, 2
The Effect of a Low Yield Nuke on a Steel Structure demolition.
The Ruth shot was a fizzle. The predicted yield

was 1.5 to 3 kt, while the 200 ton yield was a About Me
fraction of that. Especially embarrassing to UCRL was
Name: spooked
only the top 100 feet of the 300
that Location: United States
foot shot tower was vaporized The official 9/11 story is a lie. The 9/11 plane
(though much of the remainder was hijackings and crashes were clever hoaxes. The
scattered across the desert) . It was WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7 towers were brought
standard practice at that time for each test to totally erase
all evidence associated with it (automatically "declassifying"
the site), which Ruth failed to do.

General 9/11 Sites

9/11 Blimp
9/11 Busters
9/11 CGI Watch
9/11 Complicity
9/11 Cover-Up
9/11 Dossier (UK)
9/11 Encyclopedia
9/11 Foreknowledge
9/11 Hoax
9/11 Oddities
9/11 Overview
Hard to tell how tall this tower remnant is but I would guess about 100 feet, 9/11 Oz (Australian)
if the cross-sections are 10 feet apart (which would fit what looks like a 9/11 Plot
ladder near the base). 9/11 Proof
9/11 Resources
Compare the above pic to this pic of the WTC1 core remnant (click to
9/11 Review.org
enlarge):
9/11 Review.com
http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2009/03/efffect-of-low-yield-nuke-on-steel.html[07.11.2010 15:10:40]
9/11 Stealth
9/11 Strike
9/11 True Story
9/11 "U"
9/11 Verses
Thompson)
Finnish 9/11 Site
Gallerize
Icelandic 9/11 site
Killtown
Let's Roll 9/11
Essay
Essay
Nerdcities 9/11
Note the wilted pieces of steel dangling down. Operation 9/11
Planet Quo 9/11
Note-- this puts the WTC destruction into good perspective. If a 200 ton Rick Siegel (9/11 Eyewitness)
RINF 9/11 Archive
yield nuke can vaporize 100 feet of steel structure, and destroy 100 feet or
more of it, you can imagine the yield nuke that would be required to
vaporize the innards of the 208 foot wide WTC while leaving the outer walls
more or less intact. What's not clear is if there is a linear correlation by Gerard Holmgren)
between nuke yield and vaporization radius-- I would guess it's not Shunned
perfectly linear. Physics 911
Physics 9/11.co.nr
(thanks to A.P. for the find) Plague Puppy's Cafe
posted by spooked @ 8:57 AM Question 911
Truth 911
Brad's 911 site
Club Ivy's 911 site
<< Home Flamesong 9/11 Essay and Links
Stop the Lie 9/11
Total 9/11 Info
Questions Questions
The Web Fairy
Wing TV
9/11 Activism
9/11 Blogger
911 Truth.org
911 Truth LA.us
911 Truth LA.org
911 Truth Emergence
911 We Know
9-11 UK
NY 9/11 Truth

Summer of Truth
Proposition 911
Reopen 911
Deception Dollars
Justice for 9/11

Team 8 Plus
Flight 93 Hoax
WTC Demolition
9/11 Photo Analysis
WTC
collapse
Flight 77 FOIA site
Flight 93 Crash.com
Pentagon Research
9/11 Flash Movies

Buddy Buddy
Pentagon Strike
911 Questions

that question 9/11
Rigorous Intuition
Wing TV
Xymphora
Killtown's Blog
George Washington
Propaganda Matrix
Daniel Hopsicker
Cryptome
World Order News
Good Intro Books to

Griffin
Ray Griffin
Ian Henshall
Webster G. Tarpley
Thompson

Ruppert
Hopsicker

Arctic Beacon

with 9/11
Break for News
Tom Flocco

Buzzflash
The Raw Story
Think Progress
Common Dreams
Consortium News
Cursor
Guerrilla News
Online Journal
The Memory Hole
Press Action
News from Babylon
Unknown News
TV News Lies
Eschaton
Daily Kos
Talking Points Memo
Hullabaloo
Billmon
The Brad Blog
Jesus' General
The Rude Pundit
The Poor Man
Today in Iraq
Antiwar.com
Constant Pated
Clusterfuck Nation
Donkey Rising
Salon
Slate
My Other Blogs
Al-CIA-duh
Ghost Plane
Flight 93 Hoax


Peak Oil and

Oil and Gas
The Oil Drum
Land of Black Gold
Richard Heinberg
Grist

Conspiracy Theory!
World Trade Center Demolition: Further Observations on WTC1 Stairwell B

Sunday, March 29, 2009 trade center buildings 1, 2
Further Observations on WTC1 Stairwell B demolition.
1. Did Pasquale Buzzelli Surf Down The “Collapse”—or Do

Conflicting Reports Collapse the O.C.T.? About Me
Name: spooked
2. Does the Revealed “Upward Wind” During “Collapse”
Prove the Final “Cleaner Nuke”?
by The Anonymous Physicist hijackings and crashes were clever hoaxes. The
Pasquale Buzzelli is a structural engineer who was working for the Port use of small nuclear bombs in the demolition of
Authority in the North Tower on 9/11. Genelle Guzman [McMillan is added WTC1 and 2. All in all, 9/11 was a massive and
now—due to subsequent marriage] was a co-worker of Buzzelli’s at that cruel hoax foisted upon the world, done in order
time. Both would be among only 20 alleged survivors of the “collapse” of to spark the obscene "war on terror", to cover up
the two towers. Curiously all 20 were in the North Tower. Buzzelli would financial fraud and to further the ends of the
become famous for claims that he, in effect, “surfed” down 22 floors during global elite. 9/11 was only the most egregious of
“collapse” as described here. several other recent false-flag terror operations.
He was found ATOP the rubble pile, and taken to safety, at least three View my complete profile
hours after the “collapse.” Guzman-McMillan, who started out with Buzzelli
on the 64th floor, would become famous as the last person rescued alive More 9/11 Links (Note: I present a wide
from beneath the rubble, about 24 hours after the “collapse.” variety of 9/11 sites here for the
However, Guzman-McMillan’s description of events leads to the collapse of you to judge their content.)
credibility of Buzzelli. As archived here, Guzman-McMillan states that she
was on the 13th—not 22nd—floor just before the “Collapse” began; and
that Buzzelli was BELOW her. She states that Buzzelli was below her as General 9/11 Sites
he led a group of people (including her) down. She does not know, at that 9/11 Blimp
point in time, how far below her he was. So this could be but half a flight of 9/11 Busters
stairs, or several flights. But Buzzelli, and his fellow claimants thus lose AT 9/11 CGI Watch
LEAST nine flights of “collapse surfing” from Guzman-McMillan’s account. 9/11 Closeup (Gerard Holmgren)
Also please consider the possible implications in the differences in how 9/11 Complicity
they were found. Guzman-McMillan was buried BENEATH some rubble, 9/11 Cover-Up
9/11 Dossier (UK)
while Buzzelli was ATOP the rubble pile. Curiously Guzman-McMillan also
relates pressure from the Port Authority on its reported orders to Tower 9/11 Encyclopedia
workers to stay put after the “plane hits.” The article above states, “On 9/11 Foreknowledge
instructions from the Port Authority, McMillan declines to discuss why she 9/11 Hoax
stayed [initially].”
9/11 Oddities
Guzman-McMillan “felt hot” while awaiting rescue. Reports from the 12 9/11 Overview
firemen who survived in Stairwell B also have them saying they felt heat in 9/11 Oz (Australian)
the Stairwell even when initially climbing up. (This fits with my articles on 9/11 Plot
the early sub-basement nuke’s thermal rays that affected many people, 9/11 Proof
including Felipe David.) Indeed I might say that the following report from
9/11 Resources
Rick Cushman is the very first report of what I have lengthily described as
9/11 Review.org
the China Syndrome Aftermath. See this blog: wtc-
9/11 Review.com
chinasyndrome.blogspot.com. Now Rick Cushman was a marketing
http://wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/2009/03/further-observations-on-wtc1-stairwell.html[07.11.2010 15:11:32]
9/11 Stealth
manager and National Guardsman from Saugus, MA. He rushed to Ground 9/11 Strike
Zero from Massachusetts. For 12 hours he searched for survivors in the 9/11 True Story
rubble. “But he had not seen any — only pieces of bodies. 9/11 "U"
Beneath his boots, heat billowed up through the web of 9/11 Verses
steel.” Then Cushman heard Guzman-McMillan’s shouts and directed Awoken Research Group
rescuers to her. Complete 9/11 Timeline (Paul
Thompson)
Finnish 9/11 Site
Now this article reveals numerous things. Despite the fact that there
was likely a large number of people going down Stairwell B at the moment
Gallerize
of collapse— as there were only three stairwells in each tower— people German Engineers 9/11 site
survived only at a few locations along Stairwell B. There are several Hybrideb's 9/11 site
possibilities, according to my many small nukes hypothesis. As previously Icelandic 9/11 site
hypothesized here, there could have been several failed or fizzled nukes. Jane Doe's 9/11 site
Or there is the possibility, that at certain intervals, those who were in an Juscogen's 9/11 site
effective nodal region— between nukes—may have survived, at least Killtown
initially. Oil and Empire 9/11 (Mark Robinowitz)
Now Stairwell B contained 14 survivors— including 12 firefighters— who 119 Questions about 9/11
survived the tower’s final destruction. Two others— Buzzelli and Guzman- Let's Roll 9/11
McMillan— were on Stairwell B at the onset of “collapse,” but were found Morgan Reynolds WTC Demolition
Essay
elsewhere in the rubble pile. And four others were found in the Morgan Reynolds 9/11 Commission
underground Mall. (This includes the two Port Authority policemen depicted Essay
in the Oliver Stone movie.) Again it appears that the South Tower’s Missile Gate (analysis of 1st hit)
“collapse” curiously did not have any such survivors. Now the New York Nerdcities 9/11
Magazine article indicates again that some of these Stairwell B surviving Operation 9/11
firemen surmised that they survived a nuclear attack: “[Captain] Jonas and Planet Quo 9/11
his men, finally freed from their stairwell, looked around at fires and
RINF 9/11 Archive
flattened buildings. They thought they were witnessing a nuclear attack.”
My articles on the nuclear destruction of the WTC have
detailed how many firefighters surmised this. Why? Firefighters are well THE TRUTH ABOUT SEPT 11 (Compiled
familiar with heat from fire, but if they feel great heat on their skin and they by Gerard Holmgren)
are nowhere near a fire, they know something very different is going on! Shunned
Readers of my articles, and of this blog by Spooked, and his 33 blog here Physics 911
can also see the involvement of the PTB, when the article states “When Physics 9/11.co.nr
Buzzelli called at 3:30 everything changed, though not as she’d expected. Plague Puppy's Cafe
Soon, she’d know that he’d somehow landed safely in the midst of acres of Plague Puppy: Alternate Site
Question 911
destruction, a lone soul dropped to safety on a concrete slab…”
Truth 911
Brad's 911 site
The New York Magazine article has other quizzical matters, and should be
Club Ivy's 911 site
read in its entirety. There is the matter of the 12th Floor as depicted here. Brad's old 9/11 site
“Jonas picked up a Mayday from the lieutenant of Ladder Five, who Flamesong 9/11 Essay and Links
reported that he was in Stairwell B on the 12th floor. Jonas had passed him Serendipity (various essays on 9/11)
on the way down, helping a civilian. “I’m trapped and I’m hurt bad,” he said. Stop the Lie 9/11
Jonas, who was on the fourth floor, tried to climb the stairs but couldn’t The Strange Images of 9/11/2001
ascend more than a floor, and in any case, as he’d later learn, the stairwell Total 9/11 Info
had no 12th floor. “I’m sorry, I can’t help you,” he radioed back.” Unanswered Questions
Questions Questions
The highest-ranking officer on Stairwell B was Chief Richard Picciotto. He The Web Fairy
later wrote a book, as the article continues: “Picciotto’s Last Man Down Wing TV
became a best-seller. It would also end his friendship with Jonas—“It’s a
very bad book,” says Jonas— and whatever camaraderie he shared that
9/11 Activism
day with the others from Ladder Six. “We don’t speak to him,” says 9/11 Blogger
Komorowski. “Liar,” Butler wrote in his copy of the book.” 9/11 Citizens' Watch
““It was part of my personality to take charge of a situation,” Picciotto 911 Truth.org
writes. “I’d never been the type to sit idly by while someone else called the 911 Truth LA.us
shots, and I wasn’t about to start now…Picciotto was the highest-ranking 911 Truth LA.org
guy, but he was not the commanding officer. He was doing nothing. He was 911 Truth Emergence
balled up in a corner,” says Jonas.” 911 We Know
Picciotto’s book says he was on the 7th Floor when the North Tower 9-11 Visibility Project
“collapsed.” These articles indicate that the extant height of Stairwell B, 9-11 UK
after tower destruction, was five flights. And this should be kept in mind 9/11 Family Steering Committee
NY 9/11 Truth
when researching where people were at the moment destruction began,

and where they ended up. It appears that each flight had two levels of
standard zigzag stairs as depicted here. We must keep in mind that
anyone being blasted on the stairwell, but remaining in the stairwell, would Summer of Truth
have been blasted in a straight line, and shouldn’t have been blasted more Proposition 911
than a flight of stairs. This is different from those—like Buzzelli and Reopen 911
Guzman-McMillan— who were apparently blasted OUT of the stairwell, at Deception Dollars
some point, during the tower’s destruction. Justice for 9/11
(And, of course, the stairwell above the fifth floor may have been vaporized,
or otherwise destroyed.) With Guzman-McMillan ending up buried under 9/11 Specialty Sites
some rubble, and Buzzelli atop the rubble. I also note that there appears to Team 8 Plus
Flight 93 Hoax
be no pictures that show the very TOP of the extant five-floor Stairwell B
WTC Demolition
section. Could this be because the top contains obvious indications of the
great (nuclear) heat of tower destruction? Have these photos been
9/11 Photo Analysis
cropped, as many photos were in the Kennedy Assassination? I was the Evidence of Explosives on 9/11
first to note the similarity of the remnant of Stairwell B, and the remnant of Demolition, the Truth of 9/11 and the
the tower from the fizzled Upshot-Knothole Ruth nuclear fission bomb test WTC
of 3/31/53. At least the bottom third of the bomb’s tower remained because 9/11 and the Impossible: the WTC
collapse
the nuke had fizzled—it had a yield about 1/15th of what was expected.
See here: Flight 77 FOIA site
Flight 93 Crash.com
Pentagon Research
9/11 Flash Movies

Buddy Buddy
Pentagon Strike
911 Questions

that question 9/11
Rigorous Intuition
Wing TV
Xymphora
Killtown's Blog
George Washington
Propaganda Matrix
Daniel Hopsicker
Note the date has a 33. The tops of the Ruth test tower and Stairwell B
Cryptome
have some similarities as I indicated to Spooked, and as he has in his
article at his blog here on 3/12/09. The tops indicate some steel has melted World Order News
and twisted downward. Covert 2 Overt Analysis
Good Intro Books to

Finally, I cite the book, Report from Ground Zero: The Story of the Rescue
Efforts at the World Trade Center by Dennis Smith [not read by me]. In
particular I cite this review by Sterling D. Allan, an apparent Alternative 9/11 Truth
alternative energy expert. After reading that book, and Stairwell B’s "The New Pearl Harbor, Disturbing
survivors’ accounts, Allan reveals, “a cohesive conclusion: A POWERFUL Administration and 9/11" by David Ray
WIND WAS GOING UP THE STAIRS AS THE BUILDING WAS Griffin
COLLAPSING DOWN. This would seem to refute the official pancake "The 9/11 Commission Report:
theory of collapse in which one floor after another fails as the mass from Ray Griffin
above comes down.” 9/11 Revealed by Rowland Morgan and
Ian Henshall
Allan includes this familiar hypothesis, “One possible explanation for these Webster G. Tarpley
survivors, in the demolition model, is that explosives that were placed in "The Terror Timeline" by Paul
Thompson
the vicinity of this stairwell section failed to go off.” Allan however appears
to only consider non-nuclear matters, but his review is dated in 2006, "Crossing the Rubicon" by Michael C.
Ruppert
before my articles, and that of others, on the nuclear destruction of the "Welcome to Terrorland" by Daniel
WTC appeared. Hopsicker
But I conclude with the question—does the now-revealed UPWARD WIND,

of final tower destruction, indicate a nuclear blast from the ground, or
perhaps more likely from the basement? Is this upward wind another
indication of the final cleaner nuke that I have written about for several
years now? As I have written, this final cleaner nuke may also have been Arctic Beacon
seen as the so-called “nuclear glow” that TV cameras panned AWAY
FROM while purporting to show what was happening at the WTC.
with 9/11
So-- we have seen now that “surfing the collapse” is not as the regime Break for News
wishes to have it depicted. Many floors of “surfing” are missing, and ending Tom Flocco
up atop the rubble— with a huge building “collapsing” on top of you— is
incredulous. Also we see that firemen’s accounts of the upward wind of
final collapse fits well with my nuclear destruction scenario, but it impossible
with the OCT, as there would be no wind until the pancaking floors hit that
Buzzflash
level, and that would have been a downward wind. The Raw Story
posted by spooked @ 4:54 AM Progressive Independent
Think Progress
Common Dreams
Consortium News
<< Home
Cursor
Guerrilla News
Online Journal
The Memory Hole
Press Action
News from Babylon
Unknown News
TV News Lies
Eschaton
Daily Kos
Talking Points Memo
Hullabaloo
Billmon
The Brad Blog
Jesus' General
The Rude Pundit
The Poor Man
Today in Iraq
Antiwar.com
Constant Pated
Clusterfuck Nation
Donkey Rising
Salon
Slate
My Other Blogs
Al-CIA-duh
Ghost Plane
Flight 93 Hoax


Peak Oil and

Oil and Gas
The Oil Drum
Land of Black Gold
Richard Heinberg
Grist

Conspiracy Theory!

Collection of 31 Nuke Articles From Wtcdemolition - Blogspot.com (2009)

Hochgeladen von

Dokumentinformationen

Originaltitel

Copyright

Verfügbare Formate

Dieses Dokument teilen

Dokument teilen oder einbetten

Freigabeoptionen

Stufen Sie dieses Dokument als nützlich ein?

Sind diese Inhalte unangemessen?

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

Collection of 31 Nuke Articles From Wtcdemolition - Blogspot.com (2009)

Hochgeladen von

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

World Trade Center Demolition

Thursday, December 31, 2009

Permanent Top Post

See "China Syndrome at the WTC" for articles pertaining to the

Just Published: Limited Edition, Nuclear 9/11 Book by The

posted by spooked @ 8:21 PM

Friday, October 23, 2009

Index of Nuke Articles

(click on link to view article)

A Brief Summary: WTC Destruction & High Temperature

35 Reasons for Many Small Fission Nukes at the WTC (by

The Crucial Differences in the Nuclear 9/11 Theories-- A Call

On the Issue of Nuclear Demolition of the WTC and

Original WTC Nuke Thesis from "Anonymous Physicist" (by

If the WTC Nuclear Destruction Had the China Syndrome

WTC7 Demolition: Conventional, or Nuclear After All-- and

The “China Syndrome” Came to New York City on 9/11 (by

Hanging Skin and Nuclear Blasts. Where in the World is

Eyewitness Testimony of Firefighters Believing They Were

More Evidence & Testimony Indicating Nuclear Blasts,

Proof of the Existence of Mini-Nukes and Micro-Nukes (by

Brief Summary of Evidence of Nuclear bombs used at the

Was the First Atomic Bomb [in modern times] Exploded on

Could 9/11 Have Been Done With FAE/Thermobaric

Breakthroughs Toward Attaining A Complete Understanding

Basement Nukes and Top-Down Demolition (by Spooked)

Breakthrough: The Story Of Cathy T, & The Large

More On the Immediate and Continous Radiation Lowering,

The Final Word on The Tritium (by The Anonymous

Exposing The “Red Mercury” Nuclear Scam, & Its Possible

Breakthroughs Towards Attaining A Complete Understanding

On The Existence of Mini- or Micro-Nukes, Fizzled Nukes,

A Summary of Evidence of EMPs (Electromagnetic Pulses)

WTC Destruction Theories: "DEW" versus

Ground Zero Smoking Cannon: Where Are All the Core

Micro-Nukes in the WTC--Creating The China Syndrome:

Did Two Nuclear Reactors, not Nuclear Bombs, Destroy the

The Effect of a Low Yield Nuke on a Steel Structure (by

Further Observations on WTC1 Stairwell B-- 1. Did Pasquale

posted by spooked @ 12:30 PM

Thursday, July 02, 2009

The Final Word on The Tritium

by The Anonymous Physicist

Now the Finn apparently gave overarching consideration to the Tritium

Now my first articles on my “many small nukes hypothesis” cited evidence

What the nukes were mainly for, in my estimation, was to vaporize

posted by spooked @ 5:05 AM

35 Reasons for Many Small Fission Nukes at the

1) heat generation at ground zero for six months (china syndrome)

27) Steel beam bent in U has layer of molten metal on surface

posted by spooked @ 4:54 AM

Sunday, March 29, 2009

Further Observations on WTC1 Stairwell B

1. Did Pasquale Buzzelli Surf Down The “Collapse”—or Do

2. Does the Revealed “Upward Wind” During “Collapse”

by The Anonymous Physicist

However, Guzman-McMillan’s description of events leads to the collapse of

Guzman-McMillan “felt hot” while awaiting rescue. Reports from the 12

Now Stairwell B contained 14 survivors— including 12 firefighters— who

The highest-ranking officer on Stairwell B was Chief Richard Picciotto. He

““It was part of my personality to take charge of a situation,” Picciotto

COLLAPSING DOWN. This would seem to refute the official pancake

But I conclude with the question—does the now-revealed UPWARD WIND,