Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Joannes Richter A paradigm is a concept. The original Greek term (paradeigma) was used in Greek texts such as Plato's Timaeus1 as the model or the pattern that the Demiurge (god) used to create the cosmos. The word has come to refer to a thought pattern in scientific disciplines. An online dictionary 2 defines this usage as "a philosophical and theoretical framework of a scientific school or discipline within which theories, laws, and generalizations and the experiments performed in support of them are formulated; broadly: a philosophical or theoretical framework of any kind." Everybody may start life with a standard set of paradigms. Sometimes we exchange some of these frameworks and replace parts of the sets, which have been altered by insights. In fact a standard set of paradigms do not supply us with new information. Only the paradigms we have exchanged in a lifetime will really be interesting. This is what life is all about. The other framework may be considered as superfluous and redundant efforts in our lives. The following overview suggests a new set of paradigms as a concept of the origins of myths, grown from a common source of bipolarity, evolving in several sets of symbols the colors 3, the vowels I,A,U,E,O,Y, the Ego-pronouns (Mannus, man, moi, me, expanding to iu,iau,iou, and culminating in Ih, Y, I), the divine names (Diu the French Dieu , Diaus the Indo-European Dyaus, Dious the Latin IU-piter). The last entries cover another interpretation of the Kylver rune-stone and a survey of naming conventions for settlements and towns. In order to keep this overview compact the illustrations have been omitted. Instead the images and samples have been included in the references in the footnotes.
1 2 3
Plato's Timaeus 28A (ca. 360 BC) The Merriam-Webster Online red, blue (respectively yellow) and purple, which may be identified in flags, in royal robes in architecture and in paintings
Contents
Paradigm #1 - Genesis..........................................................................................................................3 Paradigm #2 The colors Red, Blue and Purple..................................................................................8 Paradigm #3 The evil colors Blue and Yellow.............................................................................11 Paradigm #4 The colors Red, White and Blue in Flags...................................................................12 Paradigm #5 The Royal Robes........................................................................................................14 Paradigm #6 The Vowels are religious symbols..............................................................................16 Paradigm #7 The Ego-pronouns are representing religious symbols..............................................21 Paradigm #8 Three layers of Ego-pronouns....................................................................................23 Paradigm #9 - Interpreting the Kylver rune-stone ............................................................................25 Paradigm #10 - Naming Conventions for Locations..........................................................................26 Paradigm #11 The words Day and night include some sacred vowels............................................30 Paradigm #12 Genesis has been used to design a language............................................................32
Paradigm #1 - Genesis
It must have been a lifetime ago I realized the glorious intent of the Book Genesis, in which the creation allegory is formulated as a series of complementary split-ups, culminating in the creation of Man4. The creation phases always start by generating a neutral object, to be followed by a split-up into a male and a female gendered objects5. Examples from Genesis may illustrate the concept, in the first day starts by creating the light as a neuter, which will be split up in a male day and a female night: Let there be light will create: a neuter object, the light (German: das Licht), which is to be divided in the daylight (German: das Tageslicht, in which the light previously had been defined as neuter) and the female concept of darkness (German: die Dunkelheit), to be named the (male) Day, (German: der Tag) respectively the (female) Night, (German: die Nacht).
The systematic gender-usage however is not very clear and the clearest gendered concept may be restricted to the first creation day, in which the neuter light has been split up in the male day and the female night. We may analyze the subsequent steps as follows: The second day may be considered as a creation process, in which the neuter Expanse has been split up in the male rain (German: der Regen) respectively a neuter surface waters (German: das Oberflchenwasser). The third day may be considered as a creation process, in which the female earth's surface (German: die Erdoberflche) has been split up in a female Earth (German: die Erde) respectively a (neuter) Meer (German: das Meer). The fourth day may be considered as a creation process, in which the neuter light (German: das Licht) has been split up in a male Day (German: der Tag) ruled by a female Sun (German: die Sonne), respectively a female Night (German: die Nacht), ruled by a male Moon (German: der Mond). The fifth day may be considered as a creation process, in which the neuter creatures (German: das Geschpf or das Tier) has been split up in male Birds (German: der Vogel) respectively male Fishes (German: der Fish). Of course these animals have been split up in male and female individuals.
The sixth day may be considered as a creation process, in which the male Primal Man (German: der Mensch) has been split up in a male person (German: der Mann) respectively a woman (German: die Frau).
4 For details see The Sky-God Dyaeus page 92 5 For details see Gender-Concepts in Creation Legends
Day #1
In the beginning God6 created the heavens and the earth. Now the earth was formless and empty. Darkness was on the surface of the deep. Gods Spirit was hovering over the surface of the waters. God said, Let there be light, and there was light. God saw the light, and saw that it was good. God divided the light from the darkness. God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night. There was evening and there was morning, one day.
Day #2
God said, Let there be an expanse in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters. God made the expanse, and divided the waters which were under the expanse from the waters which were above the expanse, and it was so. God called the expanse sky. There was evening and there was morning, a second day.
Day #3
God said, Let the waters under the sky be gathered together to one place, and let the dry land appear, and it was so. God called the dry land Earth, and the gathering together of the waters he called Seas. God saw that it was good. God said, Let the earth put forth grass, herbs yielding seed, and fruit trees bearing fruit after their kind, with its seed in it, on the earth, and it was so. The earth brought forth grass, herbs yielding seed after their kind, and trees bearing fruit, with its seed in it, after their kind: and God saw that it was good. There was evening and there was morning, one day, a third day.
Day #4
God said, Let there be lights in the expanse of sky to divide the day from the night; and let them be for signs, and for seasons, and for days and years; and let them be for lights in the expanse of sky to give light on the earth, and it was so. God made the two great lights: the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night. He also made the stars. God set them in the expanse of sky to give light to the earth, and to rule over the day and over the night, and to divide the light from the darkness. God saw that it was good. There was evening and there was morning, one day, a fourth day.
Day #5
God said, Let the waters swarm with swarms of living creatures, and let birds fly above the earth in the open expanse of sky. God created the large sea creatures, and every living creature that moves, with which the waters swarmed, after their kind, and every winged bird after its kind. God saw that it was good. God blessed them, saying, Be fruitful, and multiply, and fill the waters in the seas, and let birds multiply on the earth. There was evening and there was morning, a fifth day.
Day #6
God said, Let the earth bring forth living creatures after their kind, cattle, creeping things, and animals of the earth after their kind, and it was so. God made the animals of the earth after their kind, and the cattle after their kind, and everything that creeps on the ground after its kind. God saw that it was good.
6 1:1 After God, the Hebrew has the two letters Aleph Tav (the first and last letters of the Hebrew alphabet) as a grammatical marker.
God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the birds of the sky, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creeps on the earth. God created man in his own image. In Gods image he created him; male and female he created them. God blessed them. God said to them, Be fruitful, multiply, fill the earth, and subdue it. Have dominion over the fish of the sea, over the birds of the sky, and over every living thing that moves on the earth. God said, Behold, I have given you every herb yielding seed, which is on the surface of all the earth, and every tree, which bears fruit yielding seed. It will be your food. To every animal of the earth, and to every bird of the sky, and to everything that creeps on the earth, in which there is life, I have given every green herb for food. And it was so. God saw everything that he had made, and, behold, it was very good. There was evening and there was morning, the sixth day.
Day #7
The heavens and the earth were finished, and all the host of them. On the seventh day God finished his work which he had made; and he rested on the seventh day from all his work which he had made. God blessed the seventh day, and made it holy, because he rested in it from all his work which he had created and made. Five divine creation phases seem to correlate to splitting phases and we may list the created objects in the correct sequence of occurrence. Normally we would expect the sixth phase to culminating in another splitting phase, but in the standard version of Genesis this cannot be identified easily. Day 1 2 3 4 5 6 First mentioned light - Day waters under the expanse (sea salt water) Earth greater light (sun-day) waters (fishes) Man (male) Last mentioned darkness - Night waters above the expanse (rain sweet water) Seas lesser light (moon-night) earth (birds) Man (female)
Table 1: Creation phases in Book Genesis The standard version describes Man's creation in an asymmetrical procedure firstly resulting in an over-complete male being, to be followed by a female being, created from the bone of the man. This however would deviate from a symmetrical and simultaneous creation of the male and female partners. The symmetrical creation process has been discussed in ancient times such as 380 BC in Plato's Banquet (Symposium). Symmetrical creation processes7 however also have been discussed amongst the Hebrew rabbis, e.g. the Pharisees (ca. 30 AD)8, Jeremiah ben Eleazar9, a Palestinian scholar of the 2nd century, the highly respected medieval rabbis Rashi ( 1105) and Rashbam ( 1158) and the Zohar10.
7 See for details: The Hermetic Codex 8 From the Jewish Encyclopedia: Adam Kadmon ( Er. 18a, Gen. R. viii.) - In explaining the various views concerning Eve's creation, the Pharisees taught that Adam was created as a man-woman (androgynous). 9 Info from the website: Jewish Encyclopedia 10 The Zohar first appeared in Spain in the 13th century, and was published by a Jewish writer named Moses de Leon.
The Pharisees
The Jewish Encyclopaedia reports the creation of an androgynous being titled Adam Cadmon by Yahweh11. In explaining the various views concerning Eve's creation, the Pharisees taught 12 that Adam was created as a man-woman (androgynous).
17 The Roquepertuse acropolis has been destroyed by the Romans in 124 BC and was discovered in 1860. At this location the archaeologists found a dual-faced, androgynous sculpture, named: Hermes (0,2 m high). 18 Described as a principal German creator god in Germania by Tacitus (98 AD)
Translation errors21
In 1545 Luther published a translation22 of the Bible, in which he described the colors for the Covenant Tent and the Temple. In The 2nd Book of Moses - Exodus 25-3 he applies the words for red colors scarlet and rosin-red. Instead of the traditional color blue he erroneously uses yellow 23. The multiple, repeated error is a systematic error and may have influenced the public opinion of the symbolic colors yellow and blue. The Second Book of Chronicles (Chapter 2, 7 & 14, and Chapter 3, 14) refer to scarlet and rosin-red and yellow. The Hebrew word for blue is 'tekeleth' and the Greek word for blue is 'huakinthinos'. Blue is frequently associated with garments, tabernacle and temple furnishings such as in Exodus 26:1. In fact a great number of ancient Bible-translations does not refer to blue, but to yellow. The problem has been revealed at the Luther Bible, but the error had been introduced at least 50 years before. In fact a similar problem has been identified in a great number of Dutch Bibles such as: the Delftse bijbel published 1477, introducing yellow in parallel to blue well before Luther's translation. The Delftse bijbel may have been known to Luther. the Liesveltbijbel (1542), derived from Luther's Bible, published in Antwerpes, replacing blue by yellow the Deux-Aes-Bijbel (1562), in parts derived from the Liesvelt-Bible, published in Emden, replacing blue by yellow, and of course in Lutherse translation into Dutch language (1648), replacing blue by yellow. The Dictionary of the Holy Bible 24by Augustin Calmet explains the translation problem. The flower hyacinth has not been mentioned in the Bible. The color refers to a precious stone, which has not been specified, but may have been yellow. Today most translators refer hyacinth to the color blue a bluish blue-red hue.
19 20 21 22 23 24 See for details: The Hermetic Codex Reference: Gender References for Purple, Red and Blue See details in Analysis of the Translation Errors in Exodus 25-4 Luther-Bible published in 1545 See: Notes to the Biblical Origin of the Red, White and Blue Page 514 entry Hyacinth
In fact the misinterpretation of the hyacinth color (blue versus yellow) already started with the completion of the Septuagint-translation into Greek language, which has been dated between the 3rd century BCE and 132 BCE25.
The Bible26
The Books Exodus and Chronicles reveal a great number of symbolic colored woven materials (red, blue and purple twining) in the divine instructions for the Covenant tent and for Solomon's temple27: 28: 5They shall take the gold, and the blue, and the purple, and the scarlet, and the fine linen. 6They shall make the ephod of gold, of blue, and purple, scarlet, and fine twined linen, the work of the skilful workman. 7It shall have two shoulder-pieces joined to the two ends of it, that it may be joined together. 8The skilfully woven band, which is on it, that is on him, shall be like its work and of the same piece; of gold, of blue, and purple, and scarlet, and fine twined linen.
15You
shall make a breastplate of judgment, the work of the skilful workman; like the work of the ephod you shall make it; of gold, of blue, and purple, and scarlet, and fine twined linen, shall you make it.
28They
shall bind the breastplate by the rings of it to the rings of the ephod with a lace of blue, that it may be on the skillfully woven band of the ephod, and that the breastplate may not swing out from the ephod. There is a total of 25 divine orders for the usage of blue, purple and scarlet. In these descriptions the German Luther-Bible also mentions the color white as an additional, maybe important attribute for the twined linen.
25 From Wikipedia Septuagint: The translation process was undertaken in stages between the 3rd century BCE and the 1st century CE,[2] initially in Alexandria, but in time possibly elsewhere too. Although the translation was not completed for some time, it reached completion before 132 BCE. 26 See for details : The Hermetic Codex 27 Exodus 28:2-5 28 See the examples and other details in Red and Blue in Architecture and Artwork
Paradigm #2 - The colors Red, Blue and Purple are gender symbols
Red and blue have been used as symbolic colors for male, respectively female genders, whereas purple has been applied as a divine and/or imperial symbolic color, probably representing an androgynous gender. Purple stripes (named clavi, that is keys) were reserved for the knights and senators. As a divine emperor Nero reserved purple clothing for the imperial family. A possible misinterpretation of the hyacinthcolor (blue versus yellow) started with the completion of the Septuagint-translation into Greek language, which has been dated between the 3rd century BCE and 132 BCE. The symbolism for red and blue has been reversed in the 20th century. In 1914, The Sunday Sentinel, an American newspaper, advised mothers to use pink for the boy and blue for the girl, if you are a follower of convention. In ancient eras blue has not been considered as an evil symbol. Roman traditions 29 however avoided blue as a symbolic color. From the earliest eras of Roman history (the life of Romulus) the leader wore purple: a scarlet tunic and a toga bordered with purple. Even children did wear a robe bordered with purple. As a remarkable fact The life of Julius Caesar does not contain any reference to purple. If Plutarch had searched for any divine attribute to honor Caesar he would have been able to invent some purple robe for the divine emperor. In architecture a great number of decorations in primary colors has been identified, in which red and blue dominated.
29 Source: The Parallel Lives by Plutarch written by Plutarch around 100 A.D. - Reference: Symbolism of Purple and Scarlet in Greek and Roman Societies
30 Details have been documented in Liturgical (and Royal) Colours 31 Reference (Wikipedia - in Dutch): kazuifel 32 Details have been documented in Yellow for Judas
The Kingfisher
One of the owners of the painting The Garden of Delights may have been William I, Prince of Orange. It must be noted that the William I, Prince of Orange has adopted the kingfisher as his favorite bird. The kingfisher however has been painted twice in the Triptych of Delights. The bird reveals blue-green, white and orange colors, which partly will also be found in the Prince's flag. The first owner may even have ordered to apply the colors rose-red and blue and/or the kingfisher as elements for the paintings. The kingfisher is also found on a medal created 1572 in honor for the city of Delft's transition to the Geuzen and carrying the inscription: Een held in ijs en baren - Wien God weet te bewaren34 The same year 1572 the provinces of the Low Countries, rose in revolt against King Philip II of Spain, and the Prince of Orange placed himself at the head of the rebels. The Watergeuzen (proindependence privateers), acting on his instructions, harassed the enemy everywhere they could and they did this under a tricolor Orange White Blue35, the colors of the Prince's coat of arms. It was thus a flag easily associated with the leader of the rebellion, and the association was also expressed in the name: "the Prince's Flag." In fact the flag however may originally have been setup to symbolize the ancient, androgynous PIE-symbols.
36 This report document some notes to the Biblical Origin of the Red, White and Blue by Reginald H. W. Cox, based on the Source: 'Wake Up!' magazine, November/December 1992 37 Notes to the Biblical Origin of the Red, White and Blue
Apart from these royals God, the holy family, some of the apostles (except Judas 48 and St. Peter49) and the saints preferably have been depicted with the biblical symbolic colors red, blue 50, and purple.
38 39 40 41 42 43
See the details in Notes to the Biblical Origin of the Red, White and Blue reference: Red and Blue in the Middle Age reference to: Blue and Red in Medieval Garments reference to: Blue and Red in Medieval Garments reference to: Blue and Red in Medieval Garments reference to: Blue and Red in Medieval Garments 44 Source: Westfalian History - reference: Widukind's Tomb 45 References to: A compact Overview of Bipolar Symbolism and Blue and Red in Medieval Garments 46 Henry II, 5 March 1133 6 July 1189), ruled as King of England (11541189) 47 Reference: Blue and Red in Medieval Garments 48 Yellow for Judas 49 Yellow for Saint Peter 50 respectively yellow if the artist misinterpreted the translation blue as yellow
Paradigm #5 Red, White and Blue in royal robes refer to the Bible
In analogy to the flags the royal garments may have been chosen to correlate to the Biblical symbolic colors red, white and blue. The clothes of blue, scarlet and white of the Hebrew priests and the curtains of blue, purple, scarlet, and fine-twined linen at the Tabernacle may have inspired the royal and political leaders to choose these biblical symbolic colors for their garments, which have been documented in a great number of artworks. A number of translation errors (translating the Greek word 'huakinthinos' for blue to yellow) may have caused misinterpretations of the symbolism resulting in the usage of yellow in some of the European robes.
Joscelyn Godwin
In 1991 Joscelyn Godwin published a remarkable theory in The Mystery of the Seven Vowels in which she documents the relations between the vowels and planets, tones, songs,colors, Gods and other religious mysteries.
51 Source: The Mystery of the Seven Vowels 52 See appendix I: Adamic Language 53 See for details: The Wycliffe Bible
The most important conclusion is the analysis of the divine name, which seems to have been designed as a set of pure vowels. As a remarkable fact Joscelyn Godwin does not include the Egopronouns in the overview, although the Ego-pronouns in in great number of languages also belong to the words, which have been designed as sets of pure vowels.
54 55 56 57 58 59
See for details : The Hermetic Codex Probably represented by a red color Probably represented by a blue color Probably represented by a purple color as a 50%-50% mixture of red and blue RAbbi SHlomo Itzhaki from the Greek, hlos whole + graf writing, drawing 60 Das Runen Wrterbuch by Udo Waldemar Dieterich (1844) who describes I, U and A as the fundamental alphabetic characters (page VI).
The vowel E of the Word Ei Engraven Over the Gate of Apollos Temple
Plutarch61 describes the vowel E of the Word Ei Engraven Over the Gate of Apollos Temple at Delphi, which has been explained as a monotheistic concept Thou art one, resembling the biblical response I Am that I Am to Moses, when he asked for God's name (Exodus 3:14). At Delphi a golden character E has been spent by empress Livia62, the wife of Augustus Caesar. The brazen character E has been spent by the Athenians, but the first and oldest of all, which is the wooden one, they call the ei of the Sages, as not being of any one, but the common dedication of them all.
61 E - of the Word Ei Engraven Over the Gate of Apollos Temple at Delphi 62 58 BC-AD 29 63 English and Globish - Optimized Linguistic Designs 64 From: Ancient Egypt The Light of the World (Vol. 1-page 501) by Gerald Massey 65 This probably correlates to the word EI and the letter E at Apollo's temple as described by Plutarch in Of the word EI engraven over the gate of apollo's temple at delphi. - The Morals, vol. 4 see the details and the image in : E - of the E-symbol Engraven Over the Gate of Apollos Temple at Delphi 66 E - of the Word Ei Engraven Over the Gate of Apollos Temple at Delphi
Dante Alighieri
Dante Alighieri in his De vulgari eloquentia suggests that the name El was the first sound emitted by Adam: While the first utterance of humans after birth is a cry of pain, Dante assumed that Adam could only have made an exclamation of joy, which at the same time was addressing his Creator. In the Divina commedia, however, Dante contradicts this by saying that God was called I in the language of Adam, and only named El in later Hebrew, but before the confusion of tongues (Paradiso, 26.134).
Jupiter
The supreme Roman god was Iuppiter (Jupiter), whose name shares the Indo-European root *Iou ( dyeu) with the Greek Zeus (dyeus) and the Sanskrit dyaus (the sky). Although the early Roman gods were in some senses personal, they were generally not anthropomorphic. Originally the Roman deity Iuppiter applied a central character O. Iuppiter originated as a vocative compound of the Old Latin vocative *Iou and pater ("father") and came to replace the Old Latin nominative case *Ious. The Indo-European core *iou has also been explained as supreme justice69 and as a joint in uniting the people and the human matrimonial couples, symbolized by joining the male (I) and female (U) elements70. Matrimony has been considered a sacred act, performing a re-uniting of the separated halves of a man. These religious symbols have been encoded in the divine names, in the corresponding personal pronouns of the 1st person singular and in some other important words like justice, joints, etcetera.
67 68 69 70
Source : Divina commedia - Paradiso, Canto XXVI A Short History of Language *ious, from Proto-Indo-European *yAus- (ritual purity; supreme justice). Source justice Details are documented in: The Keywords in God's Name
71 See: On the Symbolism of the Vowels A-E-I-O-U 72 See for details : The Hermetic Codex 73 Probably represented by a red color 74 Probably represented by a blue color 75 Probably represented by a purple color as a 50%-50% mixture of red and blue 76 Das Runen Wrterbuch by Udo Waldemar Dieterich (1844) who describes I, U and A as the fundamental alphabetic characters (page VI).
In most regions vast migration phases caused deterioration of these names, resulting in shortened pronouns, such as je instead of jeu in French language. According to the Swadesh-lists the secondly most important word is the ou or Thou-pronoun, representing You respectively U, which may also represent a religious symbol. The I-symbol represents a male and the U-symbol a female element.
77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84
Ego-pronouns are the personal pronouns of the first person singular See for details : The Hermetic Codex In English: I Morris Swadesh identified the personal pronouns of the first person as the most important word in any language in Occitan language Details: The Deity Dis in the Gallic Wars and Hieroglyphs in Indo-European Languages Dis has 53 BC been described by Julius Caesar in De Bello Gallico, Book VI- chapter 18 Similar pronouns are gothic-Dutch ik, ags. ic and Icelandic ek
Abbot lfric's85 sermon86, which has been written before 1025 is using the Old-English pronoun Ic, which is identical to the Dutch pronoun: 'Ic afandige manna heortan, and heora lendena, and lcum sylle fter his frelde, and fter his agenre afundennysse.' Translation87: 'I try the hearts of men, and their reins, and give to every one according to his conduct, and according to his own device.' In a later medieval era (in the Wycliffe Bible) the Ego-pronoun is changed to Y, which in the end will be transformed to I.
85 Reference: Analysis of lfric's Language 86 The full texts may be found in 114 EPIPHANIA DOMINI and 115. THE EPIPHANY OF THE LORD. In "The homilies of the
Anglo-Saxon church. The first part, containing the Sermones catholici, or Homilies of lfric"
Mixed formulas may have been applied to correlate the divine name with the pronouns, e.g. in Walloon , Belgium, in which the divine name Diu may be related to the pronoun dji and the ancient pronoun mi 93 corresponds to the substrate man-layer. The Yod-layer, which represents a male symbolism, may have been introduced to replace the androgynous intermediate IeU-layer.
93 For pronouns, the first one given is for the one doing the action (eg: dji magne = I eat), the second, for the one target of the action (eg: avou mi = with me). 94 See the overview in table in the document The Hieroglyphs in the Ego-Pronoun
95
The Kylver stone is a Swedish runestone which dates from about 400 CE notable for its listing of each of the runes in the elder futhark. The Kylver stone was found during the excavation of a cemetery near a farm at Kylver, Stnga, Gotland in 1903. The stone was a flat limestone rock used to seal a grave and the runic inscription was written on the underside, and could therefore not be read from above. The dating of the stone from 400 CE is based upon the archeological dating of the graves. The Kylver stone was removed from Gotland and brought to the Swedish Museum of National Antiquities in Stockholm where it is not currently on display (2008). The Wikipedia-entry Kylver stone interpretes the Kylver stone as follows: [f] u a r k g [w] h n i j p z s t b e m l d o with the a, s and b runes mirrored horizontally compared to later use, and the z rune upside down. The W-rune and the Z-rune are rather unclear. After the last rune follows a spruce- or tree-like rune commonly believed to be a stacked Tiwaz rune. Another interpretation is that it is a stacked bind rune combining six Tiwaz runes used to invoke the god Tyr and four Ansuz runes to invoke the sir for protection. At a separate space the word sueus is inscribed. The meaning of this latter palindromic word is unknown, but it is assumed to be associated with magic. One possible suggestion presented by Marstrander is that it is a magical writing of the word 'eus' (the nominative form of the word horse) starting from the e and writing either way. However, this suggestion has been criticized as being "linguistically impossible" for that time period. The small inscription also uses the younger futhark version of the s-rune96.
95 The Keystone to Religion - Interpreting the Kylver rune-stone 96 Wikipedia's interpretation 97 Tuisco is the ancient Celtic Creator-God as documented by Tacitus in Germania (in 98AD), which had been almost forgotten by his people 98 Dyaus' Legacy - A Quest for the Origin of Religion
Heuneburg / Pyrene103
The Heuneburg is a prehistoric hillfort by the upper Danube, located at a location at which the Danube may be shipped by small vessels. Heuneburg is considered one of the most important early Celtic centres in Central Europe. Apart from the fortified citadel, there are extensive remains of settlements and burial areas spanning several centuries. The first settlement on the site dates to the Middle Bronze Age (15th to 12th century BC). At this time, the main plateau was fortified with a massive ditch-and-bank enclosure, including a wooden wall. The settlement was abandoned at the beginning of the Urnfield period. The citadel was reoccupied and refortified around 700 BC; adjacent areas were occupied at the same time. The complex developed briskly, and by 600 BC, the Heuneburg was one of the key centers of power and trade in Celtic/Halstatt Southern Germany. Major changes in internal structure occurred around that time.
Some of these trading routes may have used the Danube river towards the northern part of the Adreatic Sea. As rivals the Achaeans and the Trojans probably started a battle to control the dominion over these trading routes. After the Trojan War the surviving Trojans did escape to Carthage and subsequently to Rome, where they reorganized the global trading system. Most of the trading covered thousands of miles from the North and from the Baltic Sea towards the Mediterranean Sea, for which several routes had been used.
107 Terra X, 08.05.2011 19:30 (in German language) 1081370 - 1426 109 in Low German language
Black Amber
Black amber (jet) has been found in Whitby. The black mineraloid, jet, the fossilized remains of decaying wood, specifically that of the Monkey Puzzle Tree, is found in the cliffs around Whitby, and has been used since the Bronze Age to make beads and other jewellery. The Romans mined jet extensively, and Whitby jet was at the peak of its popularity in the mid-19th century, especially after it was favored as mourning jewelery by Queen Victoria when she went into mourning after the death of Prince Albert. Black jet may also have been influenced the naming of some towns such as Ravenscar. Several Raven-based names have been identified on a line from the isle of Man towards Whitby. Most of the yellow succinum-amber may already have been exhausted at the time of the Roman empire.
110 See for details: The Amber Road 111 Ammerstol has been a Dutch toll-station for amber-trading up to 1400
Paradigm #11 The words Day and night include some sacred vowels
Vowels have been recognized as the sacred symbols in Indo-European and other languages. In her paper The Mystery of the Seven Vowels (1991) Joscelyn Godwin correctly describes various religious symbols hidden in the vowels of ancient languages112. The number of vowels may vary between three (I, A, U), five (I, A, U, E, O) or seven (I, A, U, E, AE, O, OO), or even more. The most important conclusion is the analysis of the divine name, which seems to have been designed as a set of pure vowels. Godwin quotes the most interesting series listed by Godfrey Higgins in the one-vowel name I, the two-vowel name IE / EI on the sanctuary of Apollo at Delphi, the three-vowel name lAO, the fourvowel name IEVE, in which U and V are equivalent and the multi-vowel name JEHOVA . The "unpronounceable Name - IHVH" was the vowel combination IAOUE. Not pronounced, but breathed. That is uttered without closing the mouth. Its Latinised form of course is IAO - YO-WEH, or Jove. In parallel to the divine names (which often start with a consonant D or Th) most of the modern Ego-pronouns113 however are purer series of vowels than the divine names themselves. Many Ego-pronouns are correlating to the corresponding divine Creator names and Joscelyn Godwin's as well as Godfrey Higgins' rule may preferably be applied for the Ego-pronouns instead of the divine names. A closer inspection of the Genesis-objects reveals a more fascinating idea: the vowel-cores for some objects, which have been created at the very first days of Genesis also seem to correlate to the corresponding Ego-pronouns. These correlations seem to indicate a series of words that have been designed according to the creation legend. These correlations may be illustrated by some tables for several Indo-European languages in the document The Reconstruction of Some Original Ego-Pronouns. According to these investigations the Ego-pronouns originally may have been designed as pure series of vowels. Initially the word Ego may have been designed as eio or eiu, which had been derived from Deios or Theios, respectively Deius or Theius. These Ego-pronouns served as the vowel-cores for the divine names, which in contrast to the pronouns needed leading and trailing consonants. As a rule a leading D and a trailing s had to be applied to generate a divine name. The initially in Genesis created objects (such as the day and the night, as well as the rain) included a number of similar (equally sacred) vowels. In English Day and Night may be considered as special words, designed for the Genesis-process as positive elements. Day and Night have been designed to contain the ay-sequence of the Egopronoun. In the English word Night the ay-sequence of the Ego-pronoun will only be identified in the pronunciation spelling for night. In Mediterranean (French, Occitan and Romansh) languages the sacred vowels may have been ordered in a reversed sequence (ui instead of iu) in the words (French: nuit) for the night, probably to indicate the negative character of the night's darkness. The evil however is relative and may be good for the opposite side.
112On the Symbolism of the Vowels A-E-I-O-U 113 The Ego-pronoun is the personal pronoun of the first person singular (I)
Paradigm #11 The words Day and night include some sacred vowels
In analogy to the divine name and the Ego-pronoun some initially in Genesis created objects (such as the day and the night,as well as the rain) include a number of sacred vowels. In the English word Night the ay-sequence of the Ego-pronoun will only be identified in the pronunciation spelling for night. In Mediterranean (French, Occitan and Romansh) languages the sacred vowels may have been ordered in a reversed sequence (ui instead of iu) in the words (French: nuit) for the night, probably to indicate the negative character of the night's darkness.
The man-pronouns will also have been designed according to a corresponding Genesis legend, but these words may have belonged to a predecessor population, which eventually used the same or a similar Genesis legend. The Ego-generations jau, jeu, and jou may have replaced the man-pronouns in an emigration of nations. The words for day and night, which are including elementary Egopronoun-cores such as "iour" (French: "jour" = "day") and "nouit" (French: "nuit" = "day"), must have been designed along with the predefined "iou"-core, which needed to be reversed to be included in "nouit".