Nautilus

Does Stress Speed Up Evolution?

In The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy, Douglas Adams’ comedic sci-fi series from the 1970s, the Haggunenons of Vicissitus Three are one of the most insecure and angry life forms in the galaxy. What’s their problem? They have “impatient chromosomes” that instantly adapt to their surroundings. If they are sitting at a table, for instance, and are unable to reach a coffee spoon, “they are liable without a moment’s consideration to mutate into something with far longer arms … but which is probably quite incapable of drinking the coffee.”

Susan M. Rosenberg, a molecular biologist at Baylor College of Medicine, quotes Adams’ “(deliciously) askew” story in a research paper on mutations in evolution as an example of how, according to standard neo-Darwinian theory, evolution does not work. Organisms, all good students know, do not generate rapid genetic mutations in response to their environment. There are exceptions, such as mutations spurred by certain chemicals or radiation. In general, though, mutations, the raw material for natural selection, accumulate slowly in dividing cells, as the result of accidental errors in the way cells copy or repair their genetic material. The environment plays a role only later, selecting the most viable mutants.

But after more than two decades of experiments with the bacteria E. coli and most recently human cancer cells, Rosenberg is challenging that central tenet of evolutionary theory. According to Rosenberg and colleagues like Robert H. Austin, a physicist at Princeton University, organisms have evolved mechanisms that enable them to drive their own evolution in times of stress. Environmental pressure can boost mutation rates rapidly, even in cells that are not dividing, enabling them to adapt more quickly to new conditions. “Stop insisting that all mutations are random and evolution is slow is the entire story,” Austin says.

Evolution Under Pressure: Molecular biologist Susan M. Rosenberg, examining a petri dish, is making waves in biology by asserting organisms drive their own evolution through rapid genetic changes. Here she’s joined by her former students, Jeanine Pennington and Daniel M. Magner.Baylor College of Medicine

Contrary to traditional evolutionary theory, say Rosenberg and Austin—and they have their critics—cells might not need to divide much, or at all, to adapt. “All

You’re reading a preview, subscribe to read more.

More from Nautilus

Nautilus2 min read
The Rebel Issue
Greetings, Nautilus readers, and welcome to The Rebel Issue. Starting today through the end of April we’re going to bring you stories that revolve around the meaning of rebel. In our own happy rebellion against the conventions of science writing, we’
Nautilus8 min read
10 Brilliant Insights from Daniel Dennett
Daniel Dennett, who died in April at the age of 82, was a towering figure in the philosophy of mind. Known for his staunch physicalist stance, he argued that minds, like bodies, are the product of evolution. He believed that we are, in a sense, machi
Nautilus4 min readMotivational
The Psychology of Getting High—a Lot
Famous rapper Snoop Dogg is well known for his love of the herb: He once indicated that he inhales around five to 10 blunts per day—extreme even among chronic cannabis users. But the habit doesn’t seem to interfere with his business acumen: Snoop has

Related Books & Audiobooks