Traces

Reconstructing the past

One of the great challenges of writing history – whether creatively or academically – is dealing with the inherent biases and gaps in the records. Inevitably, historical records tend to favour the record keepers – the literate, the wealthy and the powerful. Those who do not leave written records – the poor or uneducated, the oppressed and marginalised, and those from non-literate cultures – find themselves either misrepresented or missing from the historical record. Worse still, this misrepresentation and omission in the primary literature perpetuates and expands itself over time in the secondary accounts.

So, how can we, we asked contributors to develop innovative and creative ways to re-examine Australia’s early coastal contact history to provide a better understanding of how Indigenous Australians reacted to, and experienced, contact from overseas.

You’re reading a preview, subscribe to read more.

More from Traces

Traces1 min read
Research Tip: Looking For A Hero?
Sometimes the hardest part of research is knowing where to begin. One useful tip is to start broad and gradually narrow your focus. When investigating stories that are linked to the Royal Shipwreck Relief and Humane Society of New South Wales (RSRHS
Traces2 min read
Welcome To The 25th Edition Of Traces!
Hello, and welcome to Edition 25 of Traces! We’re fast approaching the summer season once more – aside from being a chance to catch up on all the indulgences we’ve denied ourselves throughout the year, Christmas and summer holidays often provide the
Traces3 min read
‘Bandicooting’ And Other Phrases
When Europeans arrived in Australia, they were introduced to many species of animals that they hadn’t previously encountered. One Australian creature looked similar to the rats of Southern Asia, called ‘pandikokku’ in the Indian Telugu language, whic

Related