MHQ: The Quarterly Journal of Military History

KILLER INSTINCT

Lecturing to a group of young U.S. Army Rangers on a field at Fort Meade, Maryland, in May 1942, U.S. Army lieutenant colonel Francois d’Eliscu ordered a trainee to level his rifle and bayonet and charge at him, full bore.

“Come on, boy, like you mean business!” d’Eliscu shouted. His voice was startlingly loud and sharp, especially considering that it came from such an elfin, exotic-looking figure. Just 5 feet 5 and weighing 136 pounds, d’Eliscu was in his mid-40s and had a shiny balding head and finely chiseled features. The “Little Professor,” as some called him, had an intense glare and animated gestures—almost like a French intellectual debating over coffee in a Left Bank cafe. He had several graduate degrees and had taught at prestigious American universities.

But d’Eliscu’s confident stance, with his sinewy arms and shoulders poking out of his shirt, gave a hint that the man of letters was also well-schooled in violent confrontations. His own weapon was a 6-foot length of sash cord.

In close combat, his weapon of choice was a 6-foot length of sash cord.

The trainee lunged at his small target, the bare blade of his bayonet flashing. But d’Eliscu was a blur. Seconds later, the soldier lay flat on this back, trussed and unable to move for fear of strangling himself. D’Eliscu was unharmed, except for a patch of skin that the bayonet had shaved off his elbow as he’d disarmed his assailant.

After releasing the trainee, d’Eliscu continued his lecture. He proceeded to deride American-style boxing, with its rules barring foul blows and breaking clean from a clinch and its technique of striking with the fists. “Sportsmanship!” he snarled. If the men ever faced off against German or Japanese soldiers in close-quarters hand-tohand combat, he told them, there were no rules, and other parts of the body—open palms, elbows, feet—were more effective for striking the vulnerable spots on an enemy’s body. “This—this—this,” d’Eliscu explained, demonstrating a series of strikes. “And he’s ruined.”

And then there was the sash cord, a seemingly innocuous everyday object that in d’Eliscu’s hands could disable or even kill. “His speed and skill seem magical,” wrote R. P. Harriss, a columnist for the Baltimore Evening Sun who was on hand to observe the demonstration. “This to make the victim speechless, this to blind…this to break the neck.”

It was a type

You’re reading a preview, subscribe to read more.

More from MHQ: The Quarterly Journal of Military History

MHQ: The Quarterly Journal of Military History7 min read
Recollections Of An Officer Of Napoleon’s Army
One of the finest, most revealing and genuinely authentic accounts of the French Army of Napoleon Bonaparte (from May 18, 1804, Emperor Napoleon I) are the memoirs written by an officer who served in it as an infantry captain through numerous campaig
MHQ: The Quarterly Journal of Military History1 min read
How Many Confirmed Air Combat Victories Did The Red Baron Achieve?
For more, visit HISTORYNET.COM/MAGAZINES/QUIZ HISTORYNET ANSWER: THE FAMED FLYING ACE, WHOSE REAL NAME WAS MANFRED VON RICHTHOFEN, IS OFFICIALLY CREDITED WITH 80 AIR COMBAT VICTORIES BETWEEN SEPTEMBER 1916 AND APRIL 1918. HE ALSO HAD NUMEROUS UNCONFI
MHQ: The Quarterly Journal of Military History2 min read
Weapons Check War Hammer
The war hammer, as crude as it seems, was a practical solution to a late-medieval arms race between offense and defense. From the 14th century, steel plate armor spread amongst the warrior classes. The angled and hardened surfaces of plate armor were

Related