New Philosopher

Love’s meaning

Scholar and critic bell hooks argues that loving someone is not a matter of how you feel. Love is something you , on her view. It is active rather than passive: we choose to love, it’s not something that simply happens to us. hooks is inspired, in part, by Martin Luther King, who urged that “love is not this sentimental something that we talk about… not merely an emotional something”. I think hooks is importantly right in urging this active conception of love, and I want to connect her insight to a trend I keep love in particular.

You’re reading a preview, subscribe to read more.

More from New Philosopher

New Philosopher6 min read
Cautionary Tales
Zan Boag: It has been said that you draw inspiration from the Dutch artists Hieronymus Bosch and Pieter Bruegel. Both had a dark take on humanity’s desires and deepest fears – is that what you’re delving into with your work? Christopher Spencer (Co
New Philosopher5 min readDiscrimination & Race Relations
How Rich Is Too Rich?
To many basketball fans, Wilt Chamberlain was one of the greatest players of the 20th century. To others, Chamberlain is better remembered for his claim to have slept with twenty thousand women. (The figure seems impossible, but Chamberlain insisted
New Philosopher3 min read
Wealth
Letitia Elizabeth Landon 1802-1838 One great evil of highly civilised society is, the immense distance between the rich and the poor; it leads, on either side, to a hardened selfishness. Where we know little, we care little; but the fact once admi

Related Books & Audiobooks