The Christian Science Monitor

Can the vote be trusted? A conversation on US election integrity.

Source: Jacob Turcotte/Staff

Ahead of President-elect Joe Biden’s inauguration, Americans remain divided over the integrity of the election. This is despite Congress having certified the results, and officials across the political spectrum assuring the public that the 2020 election was secure – perhaps “the most secure in American history.”

But what does it mean to have a secure election? Is it ensuring that our systems are protected from cyberattacks? That we have ways to independently verify every vote? What about consistently investing in new technologies and resources for election officials?

For Mark Lindeman, interim co-director of the nonpartisan organization Verified Voting, it’s all of the above – and then some. 

“Doing better objectively and technically does not automatically translate to protecting American elections,” he says. “Voters need to have some fundamental belief that election results are trustworthy. And we can’t congratulate ourselves to the extent that we’re failing to provide that.”  

In this episode of “Rethinking the News,” we delve into what truly makes our elections free, fair, and secure. With guests Mr. Lindeman and Lawrence Norden, director of the Election Reform Program at New York University’s Brennan Center for Justice. 

This is the first of two episodes on trusting our elections.

“Rethinking the News” is a podcast that aims to make room for constructive conversations across a range of perspectives, and bring Monitor journalism straight to your ears. To learn more about the podcast and find new episodes, please visit our page. 

This story was designed to be heard. We strongly encourage you to experience it with your ears, but we understand that is not an option for everybody. You can find the audio player above. For those who are unable to listen, we have provided a transcript of the story below.

AUDIO TRANSCRIPT

Jessica Mendoza: Welcome to “Rethinking the News” by The Christian Science Monitor. Here, we create space for constructive conversations across a range of issues and perspectives, to give you the information you need to come to your own conclusions. I’m Jessica Mendoza.

Samantha Laine Perfas: And I’m Samantha Laine Perfas.

[Music]

Jess: The 2020 election has been certified. Officials across the political spectrum have come out in force to support the integrity of the results. 

Sam: They’ve refuted President Donald Trump’s false claims of election rigging. 

Jess: And on Tuesday, January 20th, former vice president Joe Biden will be inaugurated as the 46th president of the United States. 

But many Americans still have doubts. Ahead of November 3rd, Gallup

You’re reading a preview, subscribe to read more.

More from The Christian Science Monitor

The Christian Science Monitor4 min read
A Love Letter To Lilacs And The Joys Of Fleeting Pleasure
I grew up with a lilac shrub right outside my bedroom window. Each May, when the breeze hit just right, the scent would trail through the screen. And how nice that scent was. Light, tender, sweet, sunny, vegetal – even a bit indolic, sharing the same
The Christian Science Monitor3 min read
In Cleaning Up My Corner Of The World, I Reclaimed My Trust In Others
When a copy of “The New Yale Book of Quotations” crossed my desk awhile back, I quickly turned to my favorite selection, which came courtesy of the late anthropologist Margaret Mead: “Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens c
The Christian Science Monitor5 min readAmerican Government
Trump On Trial: What To Know As Case Moves Toward Pivotal Witness
This week porn star Stormy Daniels provided some of the most explosive testimony yet in former President Donald Trump’s hush money trial in a Manhattan courtroom. Under oath, and in front of a jury, Ms. Daniels described in vivid detail her alleged s

Related Books & Audiobooks