The Soul of the First Amendment
Written by Floyd Abrams
Narrated by James Foster
3/5
()
About this audiobook
A lively and controversial overview by the nation’s most celebrated First Amendment lawyer of the unique protections for freedom of speech in America
The right of Americans to voice their beliefs without government approval or oversight is protected under what may well be the most honored and least understood addendum to the US Constitution—the First Amendment. Floyd Abrams, a noted lawyer and award-winning legal scholar specializing in First Amendment issues, examines the degree to which American law protects free speech more often, more intensely, and more controversially than is the case anywhere else in the world, including democratic nations such as Canada and England. In this lively, powerful, and provocative work, the author addresses legal issues from the adoption of the Bill of Rights through recent cases such as Citizens United. He also examines the repeated conflicts between claims of free speech and those of national security occasioned by the publication of classified material such as was contained in the Pentagon Papers and was made public by WikiLeaks and Edward Snowden.
Floyd Abrams
Floyd Abrams, a senior partner in the Cahill Gordon & Reindel law firm, has litigated cases ranging from the Pentagon Papers case to Citizens United and has taught as a visiting lecturer at the Yale Law School.
Related to The Soul of the First Amendment
Related audiobooks
Corruption in America: From Benjamin Franklin's Snuff Box to Citizens United Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Constitution Today: Timeless Lessons for the Issues of Our Era Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5E Pluribus Unum: How the Common Law Helped Unify and Liberate Colonial America, 1607-1776 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsActive Liberty: Interpreting Our Democratic Constitution Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Our Republican Constitution: Securing the Liberty and Sovereignty of We the People Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5On Treason: A Citizen's Guide to the Law Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsUncivil Warriors: The Lawyers' Civil War Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Fundamental Cases: The Twentieth Century Courtroom Battles That Changed Our Nation Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Oath and the Office: A Guide to the Constitution for Future Presidents Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Taking Back the Constitution: Activist Judges and the Next Age of American Law Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/551 Imperfect Solutions: States and the Making of American Constitutional Law Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How Rights Went Wrong: Why Our Obsession with Rights Is Tearing America Apart Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Second Amendment: A Biography Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Unelected: How an Unaccountable Elite is Governing America Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Freedom of Speech: Understanding the First Amendment Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5We the People: A Progressive Reading of the Constitution for the Twenty-First Century Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Worse Than Nothing: The Dangerous Fallacy of Originalism Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Prosecuting the President: How Special Prosecutors Hold Presidents Accountable and Protect the Rule of Law Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Free Speech Century Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Agreeing to Disagree: How the Establishment Clause Protects Religious Diversity and Freedom of Conscience Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsClarence Thomas and the Lost Constitution Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Free Speech: The First Amendment in Crisis Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Is Racial Equality Unconstitutional? Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Liberty: Natural Rights and the American Constitution Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFree Justice: A History of the Public Defender in Twentieth-Century America Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Constitution: Enduring Myths and Hidden Truths Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsIs Democracy Possible Here?: Principles for a New Political Debate Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Packing the Court: The Rise of Judicial Power and the Coming Crisis of the Supreme Court Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Constitutional Law For You
The Anti-Federalist Papers and the Constitutional Convention Debates Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Constitution Demands It: The Case for the Impeachment of Donald Trump Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Lies the Government Told You: Myth, Power, and Deception in American History Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Unwarranted: Policing Without Permission Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Civics, Law, and Justice--How We Became U.S.: Insights from a Trial Judge Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Federalist Papers Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5A Well-Regulated Militia: The Founding Fathers and the Origins of Gun Control in America Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Sex and the Constitution: Sex, Religion, and Law from America's Origins to the Twenty-First Century Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5We the People: A Progressive Reading of the Constitution for the Twenty-First Century Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How Rights Went Wrong: Why Our Obsession with Rights Is Tearing America Apart Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Executive Juris Doctor: Learn to Think Like a Lawyer Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Cult of the Constitution Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Dollars for Life: The Anti-Abortion Movement and the Fall of the Republican Establishment Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Oath and the Office: A Guide to the Constitution for Future Presidents Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Reading the Constitution: Why I Chose Pragmatism, not Textualism Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Worse Than Nothing: The Dangerous Fallacy of Originalism Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Hidden History of the Supreme Court and the Betrayal of America Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Brethren: Inside the Supreme Court Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Impeach: The Case Against Donald Trump Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Scalia's Court: A Legacy of Landmark Opinions and Dissents Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Closing the Courthouse Door: How Your Constitutional Rights Became Unenforceable Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Ratification: The People Debate the Constitution, 1787-1788 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Loaded: A Disarming History of the Second Amendment Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Conversations with RBG: Ruth Bader Ginsburg on Life, Love, Liberty, and Law Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Justices Behind Roe V. Wade: The Inside Story, Adapted from The Brethren Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Abortion and the Law in America: Roe v. Wade to the Present Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Clarence Thomas and the Lost Constitution Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Related categories
Reviews for The Soul of the First Amendment
10 ratings3 reviews
- Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The beginning of this book was a historical analysis of the first amendment. The author went through the creation and use, or lack thereof, of the principles of the first amendment. However, he then devolved into his highly politicized views on Citizens United, Snowden, and Assange. I would recommend reading it for the first part, but the second part was more propaganda than analysis.
- Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5Short, unhelpful book about how awesome the US First Amendment is, defending Abrams’ role in Citizens United because we should be able to spend unlimited amounts of money promoting candidates and the alternative is a slippery slope to government tyranny, and by we I mean rich people. This is a hard argument to make given that Abrams concedes that Canada, the UK, and Germany—none of which have an absolutist free speech protection—are functioning democracies, at least as much as the US is. There’s certainly a case to be made for protecting the hate speech etc. that those countries suppress, but the fact that Donald Trump could have been prosecuted for things he said about Mexicans during the campaign had he been running in one of those countries is not the knock-down argument to me that Abrams thinks it is. There is, I think, a case to be made that the same tools that coexist with democracy in other Western democracies would be misused more readily in the US because Americans are Weird, but it has to be made; the experience of those other countries cannot just be brushed off with claims that a slippery slope is inevitable once we regulate any speech. (And slopes go both ways; somehow the US got to its current absolutism from a past that looked a lot more like other Western democracies in terms of speech regulation, so evidently it’s not a permanent condition.)
- Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The first amendment to the constitution is American exceptionalism writ large. It keeps the USA from participating in legal judgments internationally, because virtually everyone else’s speech laws are more restrictive in fact. It might not be the most liberal doctrine in the world, but it is the most scrupulously applied. Floyd Abrams has been a hands-on lawyer in matters of free speech – for decades. I was rather hoping for some dramatic insight from his experience, but The Soul Of The First Amendment is a quick review of how to observe it.Abrams has a very uncomfortable chapter on Citizens United, in which he represented the winning (Republican) side. He acknowledges that 80% of Americans think the Supreme Court decision is wrong, but he defends it as fair, natural, obvious and consistent with the first amendment. He continually points instead to the power of the press, but at the beginning of the book he quotes the founders as wanting the press to be the exception: that nothing should ever restrain it. To the point of not bothering to include it in the first amendment because that was redundant. So it’s not really on the table in Citizens United. He addresses that billion dollar funds and corporations should have the same speech rights as individuals - as accepted. Period. It’s uncomfortable because (from down here) it’s not that government and corporations might swamp politics with money. It’s that their influence should have no place in the discourse among the voters. There should be nothing wrong with setting limits at the lowest common denominator. My money cannot compete with Koch Industries, and Koch Industries doesn’t get a vote. So why is it allowed to cloud the conversation? That’s where Citizens United goes off the rails for most Americans, but Abrams skirts that event horizon. I don’t blame him, but it makes the book incomplete.The final chapter poses the self-censorship problems of the press – whether to publish whistleblower documents and other “Top Secret” files. Nobody likes to have their secrets exposed, but Americans don’t like being spied on in secret, either. But again, the press is not part of the constitution’s equation.The Soul Of The First Amendment doesn’t examine online speech, trolls, gag orders, harassment (other than a short foray into abortion clinic harassment) or secret courts. At just 137 pages, it can’t tackle every aspect. It does put forth a thoughtful analysis of the aspects it does examine, which is a pleasant relief from the strident accusations of our time. Not enough however.David Wineberg