Just Six Numbers: The Deep Forces That Shape the Universe
Written by Martin Rees
Narrated by John Curless
4/5
()
About this audiobook
Martin Rees
Martin Rees is Professor of Cosmology and Astrophysics and Master of Trinity College at the University of Cambridge. He was the President of the Royal Society until this year, and is the Astronomer Royal. A member of the House of Lords, he is a foreign associate of the National Academy of Sciences and the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, and is an honorary member of the Russian Academy of Sciences. His awards include the Gold Medal of the Royal Astronomical Society, the Einstein Award of the World Cultural Council and the Crafoord Prize (Royal Swedish Academy).
More audiobooks from Martin Rees
Ripples in Spacetime: Einstein, Gravitational Waves, and the Future of Astronomy Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5On the Future: Prospects for Humanity Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5If Science is to Save Us Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Related to Just Six Numbers
Related audiobooks
Why Does E=MC² and Why Should We Care? Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Lightness Being: Mass, Ether, and the Unification of Forces Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Three Roads to Quantum Gravity Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Cosmic Revolutionary's Handbook: (Or: How to Beat the Big Bang) Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Calculating the Cosmos: How Mathematics Unveils the Universe Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Dark Matter & Dark Energy: The Hidden 95% of the Universe Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Gravity's Engines: How Bubble-Blowing Black Holes Rule Galaxies, Stars, and Life in the Cosmos Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Forces of Nature Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Impact: How Rocks from Space Led to Life, Culture, and Donkey Kong Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Universe: Leading Scientists Explore the Origin, Mysteries, and Future of the Cosmos Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Dark Matter and the Dinosaurs: The Astounding Interconnectedness of the Universe Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5At the Edge of Time: Exploring the Mysteries of Our Universe's First Seconds Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Universe: The book of the BBC TV series presented by Professor Brian Cox Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Beginning and the End of Everything: From the Big Bang to the End of the Universe Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Origin of the Universe Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Cosmic Blueprint: New Discoveries in Nature's Creative Ability to Order the Universe Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Quantum Space: Loop Quantum Gravity and the Search for the Structure of Space, Time, and the Universe Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Horizons of Cosmology: Exploring Worlds Seen and Unseen Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Five Billion Years of Solitude: The Search for Life Among the Stars Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The One Thing You Need to Know: The Simple Way to Understand the Most Important Ideas in Science Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Little Book of Exoplanets Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Little Book of Black Holes: Science Essentials Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Planets Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5How It Began: A Time-Traveler's Guide to the Universe Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How We'll Live on Mars Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Chandra's Cosmos: Dark Matter, Black Holes, and Other Wonders Revealed by NASA's Premier X-Ray Observatory Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Exoplanets (Goldsmith): Hidden Worlds and the Quest for Extraterrestrial Life Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Origins of the Universe: The Cosmic Microwave Background and the Search for Quantum Gravity Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5
Astronomy & Space Sciences For You
The Theory of Everything: The Origin and Fate of the Universe Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Holographic Universe: The Revolutionary Theory of Reality Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Invisible College: What a Group of Scientists Has Discovered About UFO Influences on the Human Race Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Cosmos and Psyche: Intimations of a New World View Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Dark Matter & Dark Energy: The Hidden 95% of the Universe Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Creator and the Cosmos: How the Latest Scientific Discoveries Reveal God Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Darwin's Doubt: The Explosive Origin of Animal Life and the Case for Intelligent Design Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5A Brief History of Time: From the Big Bang to Black Holes Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Beginning and the End of Everything: From the Big Bang to the End of the Universe Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Book of the Moon: A Guide to Our Closest Neighbor Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Brief History of Black Holes: And why nearly everything you know about them is wrong Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Cosmos: A Personal Voyage Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Extraterrestrial Species Almanac: The Ultimate Guide to Greys, Reptilians, Hybrids, and Nordics Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Under Alien Skies: A Sightseer's Guide to the Universe Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Seven Days that Divide the World, 10th Anniversary Edition: The Beginning According to Genesis and Science Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Alien Oceans: The Search for Life in the Depths of Space Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Black Holes: The Key to Understanding the Universe Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Visits from the Afterlife: The Truth about Ghosts, Spirits, Hauntings, and Reunions with Lost Loved Ones Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Man on the Moon Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Origins of the Universe: The Cosmic Microwave Background and the Search for Quantum Gravity Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Broca's Brain: Reflections on the Romance of Science Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5From Eternity to Here: The Quest for the Ultimate Theory of Time Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Theories of the Universe Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Apollo 11: The Inside Story Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Peregrine Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How to Read Nature: An Expert's Guide to Discovering the Outdoors You've Never Noticed Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Secret Lives of Planets: Order, Chaos, and Uniqueness in the Solar System Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Science of Interstellar Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for Just Six Numbers
162 ratings11 reviews
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Sooo kool it was good for me but I remember
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5He does a pretty good job of explaining things and keeping it simple. Some parts were very interesting. Other parts went right over my head
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5An excellent Popular Science trip through the bits that just seem weird with one of the world's great cosmologists. Sir Martin manages to keep things just about understandable for someone who needs to remind himself which one lambda is, but thinks it's Einstein's one.It's 20 years since this was published and that means I'm off to figure out what's moved on as I certainly know parts have, but I'll feel more comfortable so doing having read this book.
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5(original review, 2000)If there was an infinite number of universes wouldn't there be a universe in which a mad scientist had discovered how to destroy all the universes and pressed the button, so there would be nothing at all? But then there would also be a good scientist who devised a plan to stop the mad scientist from pressing the button in the first place! What if they are one & the same, who wins? But as with Madeira Island's Nationalism, the bad scientist would only have to succeed once.Fine tuning suggests that the Universe is at it is because in effect that's how it has to be therefore the creator is not malevolent. Believers would believe that the Universe is fine tuned whilst atheists would not. Therefore Devil's Advocate likes attributing believers with atheist views to lay a charge of brutality malevolent when in actual fact the malevolent theory is their own. Devil's Advocate has missed the fact that if you don't believe in fine tuning and you don't believe in God then you are laying the blame for random cruelty on evolution. The reverse is not true because believers accept fine tuning:God + Belief + Fine tuning = No Malevolence (according to Dawkin’s argument);Atheism + randomness + evolution = Biology professor criticising the welfare state for allowing thick yobs too have too many kids.So, is there a universe somewhere in which every Tom, Dick and Harry et al are decent talented principled intelligent informed people with nothing but social & environmental good at heart & in action? Ah, well, clearly the multiverse hypothesis has just been irrevocably debunked. Pity. Nah. Nor really. There are definitely multiverses. They exist on the far side of infinity. More importantly, did my cat Ilsa go to heaven? I'm not sure. Maybe she's God in a reverse multiverse. And perhaps (nay, certainly) also a universe in which the multiverse theory does not apply. (*head explodes*) But what do I know. I'm too thick to understand any of this. More importantly: Can Benfica win the Portuguese League this year, that's what I want to know. Sure can. In the universe 3 universes over, they win it with a team made up entirely of dachshunds!Seriously, the many-worlds interpretation isn't really about the universe splitting per se, the goal is to avoid the problem of wavefunction collapse that is invoked in measurement. The principle of superposition means that we can create states that are, for example, half spin up and half spin down. When we make a measurement of the spin, the wavefunction collapses into only one of these states. However, these measurement processes are qualitatively different from unobserved processes, which allow the wavefunction to evolve smoothly with time. This has led to a lot of discussions about the role of observers in quantum mechanics (Schrödinger's cat, etc.). The basic idea of many worlds is that there is nothing special about measurement. The wavefunction only appears to collapse to the (necessarily quantum) observer, but all possible universes coexist in the same way that the states spin up and down can coexist for the electron.
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5You may be familiar with a so called “proof” for the existence of a creator [or do I mean “Creator” (?)] from the apparent design of [his or her] creatures. This argument has been pretty much debunked as it applies to living animals by (1) the theory of evolution and (2) a deep understanding how the phenomenon of emergence can result in complex order arising from randomness despite the second law of thermodynamics. Nonetheless, it does seem as if the earth is very well suited for human life and probably will continue to be so unless climate change deniers prevent sensible people from taking steps necessary to protect our environment. Indeed, the fact that human life evolved as it did seems to be dependent on the fact that a number of ratios of physical phenomena fall within some very sensitive parameters. Martin Rees, a Royal Society Research Professor at Cambridge University, who was also the official Astronomer Royal of Great Britain, wrote a very interesting book in 1999 that explored the sensitivity of six of those parameters, which he argues are fundamental to modern physics and the known structure of the universe. Rees observes that each of these ratios has to fall within a very narrow range or, for example (in no particular order): (1) atoms could not have formed after the Big Bang, (2) galaxies could not have formed, (3) the universe would have already collapsed upon itself, (4) the nuclear power generated at the core of the sun would not diffuse outward at just the right rate to balance the heat lost at the surface, and (5) there could be no complex chemistry, atoms larger than helium being unstable. Although arguing that the universe is spookily “fine tuned,” Rees draws no conclusions as to whether a benign Creator made it so. Other sources like YouTube indicate that he is an atheist. Instead of God, he discusses the cosmological theory of the “multiverse,” the possibility that there are many, if not an infinite number of, other universes that are not as finely tuned as our own. In such a case, the anthropic principal dictates that our universe is finely tuned for human benefit because if it were not, we would not be here! Evaluation: This book is well worth reading for a lot of reasons. It gives a lucid explication of many physics principles and serves as an excellent introduction to advances in cosmology. I would quibble with the premise that all the constants are “fine tuned,” but his argument that human life depends on several of them falling within narrow limits appears irrefutable.(JAB)
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Science writer and astronomer Rees summarizes the history of the universe, pointing out that six numbers related to basic physical constants (for example, the relative strengths of the gravitational and electromagnetic attraction) determine how the universe developed. In addition, he shows how, if these numbers were only slightly different, stars and galaxies would not form, complex chemistry would not be possible, and life could not evolve. This raises the interesting philosophical question, Why? One could dismiss the question by saying that, if it were otherwise, we wouldn't be here to ask or that there is some underlying theory as yet unknown that would show that these values must be what they are. However, Rees suggests that these numbers were set shortly after the big bang and could well have been different. Indeed, there may be a multitude of other universes, forever inaccessible to us, in which they are different. Thus, with a huge choice of possible universes, one must exist that could support intelligent beings who can observe and question. Whether one agrees or not with Rees's ideas, his book is recommended for its cogent synopsis of modern cosmologic thought
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5I wonder if any one here read the same book I did, I found the book to be very readable. I didn't see much of the Intelligent design stuff. it it spoke of it, i would have said it put everything within limits. As general readable text (Brian Green's stuff is sometimes not) I think it is a great book all should read it to learn the rules of the road in cosmology.
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5I can see how this book could be considered to contribute to the debate about intelligent design, but unless I missed something fundamental, it is a dispassionate exposition based upon rigorous science. As with all scientifically based literature, it is open to interpretation. Science should just provide data to inform hypotheses, not interpret things in any subjective way. Unfortunately, many non-scientists do not follow this discipline, so I can see how the data presented here could be hi-jacked by creationists. Professor Rees has posed many more questions than he has answered - which is to be expected. I read this book in a spirit of scientific curiosity, and I found it very informative and entertaining. frankly, I would recommend it to anyone, scientifically oriented or not.
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Despite the suggestions of other reviews, this book has nothing to do with theology or "intelligent design". The author, Martin Rees, is a cosmologist at Cambridge University and does not propagate the ideas of intelligent design in any way. In fact , in the final chapter Rees states that he does not interpret the fine tuning of universal constants to an intelligent designer but rather supports the notion of a "multiuniverse". Just Six Numbers is a well-written introduction into the forces that shape our existence. The book focuses on 6 fundamental constants in the universe and how key the values of these numbers are towards the universe and life ever coming into being. I can see how the religious crowd would jump on these ideas as "proof" of god but a simple swipe of Occam's razor takes care of these notions. Not overly technical and no mathematics required to enjoy and understand this book.
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Excellent introduction to cosmology and astronomy. Very easy to read and understand, and has everything to make you want to explore the subject further.
- Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Rees’ small volume on cosmology is good but not great. He details the origins and fine-tuned-ness of six physical constants: N (10^36 = strength of atomic electrical forces); E (0.007 = nuclear force); Omega (the amount of dark matter in the universe); Lambda (anti-gravitational force); Q (1/100,000 = ratio between fundamental energies); and D (3 = number of dimensions). If any of these numbers were slightly off, we would not have the universe as we recognize it today. While Rees has neither the flare or plain-spoken-ness that Brian Greene possesses, he gets his point across with some competence. I wouldn’t recommend starting with this book, but it is nevertheless a decent source of cosmological wonder.