The Texas Jury Rules
By James M. Stanton and Trey Cox
()
Currently unavailable
Currently unavailable
About this ebook
Related to The Texas Jury Rules
Related ebooks
Common Sense Rules of Advocacy for Lawyers: A Practical Guide for Anyone Who Wants to Be a Better Advocate Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEthics: A Lawyer’s Perspective with Case Studies Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Absolute Beginner's Guide to Cross-Examination Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTrial and the Art of Sailing: A Guidebook for New (and Not So New) Attorneys to Navigate Trial Advocacy, and Life Ebook
Trial and the Art of Sailing: A Guidebook for New (and Not So New) Attorneys to Navigate Trial Advocacy, and Life
byMichael D. SchwartzRating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHow the Judicial Branch Works Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsJustice in Your Court: What Would It Look Like? 50 Real-Life Cases for You to Decide Ebook
Justice in Your Court: What Would It Look Like? 50 Real-Life Cases for You to Decide
byTom BorcherRating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Legal Eagles of Children's Advocacy Centers:: A Lawyer's Guide to Soaring in the Courtroom Ebook
The Legal Eagles of Children's Advocacy Centers:: A Lawyer's Guide to Soaring in the Courtroom
byAndrew H. AgatstonRating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBeyond the Bar: Challenges in a Lawyer's Life Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Justices Behind Roe V. Wade: The Inside Story, Adapted from The Brethren Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRepresent Yourself in Court: Prepare & Try a Winning Civil Case Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsExperiencing Other Minds in the Courtroom Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsProsecuted Prosecutor: A Memoir & Blueprint for Prosecutor-led Criminal Justice Reform Ebook
Prosecuted Prosecutor: A Memoir & Blueprint for Prosecutor-led Criminal Justice Reform
byBianca M FordeRating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAsk a Judge Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBADFELLAS: REFLECTIONS ON A LIFE IN THE HALLS OF JUSTICE Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLiving on the Edge: Memories of a Trial Lawyer Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsJudicial Dispute Resolution: New Roles for Judges in Ensuring Justice Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Psychology of Jury Selection Rating: 1 out of 5 stars1/5Representing Yourself In Court (US): How to Win Your Case on Your Own Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Of Courtiers and Princes: Stories of Lower Court Clerks and Their Judges Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTwenty Million Angry Men: The Case for Including Convicted Felons in Our Jury System Ebook
Twenty Million Angry Men: The Case for Including Convicted Felons in Our Jury System
byJames M. BinnallRating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRogues in Black Robes Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOf Courtiers and Kings: More Stories of Supreme Court Law Clerks and Their Justices Ebook
Of Courtiers and Kings: More Stories of Supreme Court Law Clerks and Their Justices
byClare CushmanRating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDo Your Own Arbitration Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Trial of A Trial (A Mock Trial Story) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFixing the Engine of Justice: Diagnosis and Repair of Our Jury System Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Jury Duty - US Government and Politics | Children's Government Books Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCannon Law Firm: Guidebook to Oklahoma Criminal Law Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDivorce in California: The Legal Process, Your Rights, and What to Expect Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Why Jury Duty Matters: A Citizen’s Guide to Constitutional Action Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Laws and Lawyers in Today’S America: Thoughts from the Inside Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related podcast episodes
43: The Problem with Plea Deals with Professor Carissa Byrne Hessick: If you believed the many legal dramas in TV reflected actual court proceedings, you would be under the impression that our legal system is driven by the battle of wits between two lawyers at trial. If, however, you examine how our legal system... Podcast episode
43: The Problem with Plea Deals with Professor Carissa Byrne Hessick: If you believed the many legal dramas in TV reflected actual court proceedings, you would be under the impression that our legal system is driven by the battle of wits between two lawyers at trial. If, however, you examine how our legal system...
byPublic Defenseless0 ratings0% found this document usefulVictim Identification Evidence: Sample v. Commonwealth of Virginia Podcast episode
Victim Identification Evidence: Sample v. Commonwealth of Virginia
byOral Arguments of the Supreme Court of Virginia0 ratings0% found this document usefulMatthew Clair, "Privilege and Punishment: How Race and Class Matter in Criminal Court" (Princeton UP, 2020): An interview with Matthew Clair Podcast episode
Matthew Clair, "Privilege and Punishment: How Race and Class Matter in Criminal Court" (Princeton UP, 2020): An interview with Matthew Clair
byNew Books in Public Policy0 ratings0% found this document usefulMatthew Clair, "Privilege and Punishment: How Race and Class Matter in Criminal Court" (Princeton UP, 2020): An interview with Matthew Clair Podcast episode
Matthew Clair, "Privilege and Punishment: How Race and Class Matter in Criminal Court" (Princeton UP, 2020): An interview with Matthew Clair
byNew Books in Law0 ratings0% found this document usefulMatthew Clair, "Privilege and Punishment: How Race and Class Matter in Criminal Court" (Princeton UP, 2020): An interview with Matthew Clair Podcast episode
Matthew Clair, "Privilege and Punishment: How Race and Class Matter in Criminal Court" (Princeton UP, 2020): An interview with Matthew Clair
byNew Books in Critical Theory0 ratings0% found this document usefulMatthew Clair, "Privilege and Punishment: How Race and Class Matter in Criminal Court" (Princeton UP, 2020): An interview with Matthew Clair Podcast episode
Matthew Clair, "Privilege and Punishment: How Race and Class Matter in Criminal Court" (Princeton UP, 2020): An interview with Matthew Clair
byPrinceton UP Ideas Podcast0 ratings0% found this document usefulEpisode 1: Eduardo Tagle and the Mexican Supreme Court 0 ratings0% found this document usefulThe Litigation Psychology Podcast - Episode 98 - Decision Making in Trial Practice: Chris Patton, Partner at Lynn Pinker Hurst & Schwegmann and John Adams, Trial Lawyer at Gibson Dunn, join Dr. Bill Kanasky, Jr. to talk about commercial litigation and the article they co-authored titled Give the Jury What It Wants: Decision-Making in Tr... Podcast episode
The Litigation Psychology Podcast - Episode 98 - Decision Making in Trial Practice: Chris Patton, Partner at Lynn Pinker Hurst & Schwegmann and John Adams, Trial Lawyer at Gibson Dunn, join Dr. Bill Kanasky, Jr. to talk about commercial litigation and the article they co-authored titled Give the Jury What It Wants: Decision-Making in Tr...
byThe Litigation Psychology Podcast0 ratings0% found this document useful17: Public Defenseless 202: In this special solo episode, I share some thoughts on the first 16 episodes, thoughts from my interactions with people who have reached out, and the direction the show will be going over the next few points I wanna first thank all the people who have... Podcast episode
17: Public Defenseless 202: In this special solo episode, I share some thoughts on the first 16 episodes, thoughts from my interactions with people who have reached out, and the direction the show will be going over the next few points I wanna first thank all the people who have...
byPublic Defenseless0 ratings0% found this document usefulDavid Ball and Don Keenan, “Reptile: The Manual of the Plaintiff’s Revolution” (Balloon Press, 2009): “I am not smart. I invented smart to compel you to do what I want.” — The Reptile Any civil trial represents the culmination of many, many years of disciplined mental effort. Legal education generates learning, Podcast episode
David Ball and Don Keenan, “Reptile: The Manual of the Plaintiff’s Revolution” (Balloon Press, 2009): “I am not smart. I invented smart to compel you to do what I want.” — The Reptile Any civil trial represents the culmination of many, many years of disciplined mental effort. Legal education generates learning,
byNew Books in Law0 ratings0% found this document usefulBlack Lawyers Speak, Ep. 5: Black Judges Matter 0 ratings0% found this document usefulRoad to Confirmation: Judge Jackson's Walk Through Fire (with Syovata Edari, Steve Vladeck, Zinelle October and Danielle Holley Walker) Podcast episode
Road to Confirmation: Judge Jackson's Walk Through Fire (with Syovata Edari, Steve Vladeck, Zinelle October and Danielle Holley Walker)
byOn The Issues With Michele Goodwin0 ratings0% found this document useful6. Pick a Winning Jury: Make the Emotional Connection | Harry and Claire Plotnick: Few people have more experience with jury selection than Harry and Claire Plotnick. Over the past 20 years, their expertise in picking the right jury has helped attorneys recover over $2 Billion in over 800 trials. The California-based husband and wife te Podcast episode
6. Pick a Winning Jury: Make the Emotional Connection | Harry and Claire Plotnick: Few people have more experience with jury selection than Harry and Claire Plotnick. Over the past 20 years, their expertise in picking the right jury has helped attorneys recover over $2 Billion in over 800 trials. The California-based husband and wife te
byTip the Scales0 ratings0% found this document useful190. Understanding Subconscious Judicial Bias (with Professor Craig Jones): Join our host, Nick Kruiper, in discussion with Law Professor Craig Jones of Thompson Rivers University. Dr. Jones teaches administrative and constitutional law and has an impressive resume as a litigator. Nick sits down with Dr. Jones to talk about ... Podcast episode
190. Understanding Subconscious Judicial Bias (with Professor Craig Jones): Join our host, Nick Kruiper, in discussion with Law Professor Craig Jones of Thompson Rivers University. Dr. Jones teaches administrative and constitutional law and has an impressive resume as a litigator. Nick sits down with Dr. Jones to talk about ...
byThe Law School Show0 ratings0% found this document usefulMurder In Moscow: The Goncalves Family Slams Kohberger's Team For Playing The Delay Game (5/5/24): Capital murder trials are typically more lengthy and complex than other criminal trials due to several reasons: - Severity of the Charges: Capital murder trials involve the most serious of crimes, often resulting in the death penalty or life... Podcast episode
Murder In Moscow: The Goncalves Family Slams Kohberger's Team For Playing The Delay Game (5/5/24): Capital murder trials are typically more lengthy and complex than other criminal trials due to several reasons: - Severity of the Charges: Capital murder trials involve the most serious of crimes, often resulting in the death penalty or life...
byThe Epstein Chronicles0 ratings0% found this document usefulWhy Are You Surprised with Judge Victoria Pratt 0 ratings0% found this document usefulA Week of Unimaginable Judicial Hell Destroying What’s Left of America Ep. 158: In this episode of the Conservative Conscience, we speak the truth about the severity of the judicial crisis, how it happened, what is happening now that makes this issue an emergency, why it won’t be fixed with traditional methods, how conservative legal elites have screwed us, and what we can do about it. We begin by addressing almost a dozen mind-boggling decisions by the courts recently and how they are shutting down our country and nobody is talking about it. Next, we address the stratagem and philosophy behind what they are doing and how it will succeed no matter how many new judges Trump appoints. Finally, we conclude with a lesson on the difference between judicial review and judicial supremacy, how “conservative” legal activists are part of the problem and misunderstand this lesson, and what we can do to educate people and change course. Key quotes: “If god gave me one political wish, it Podcast episode
A Week of Unimaginable Judicial Hell Destroying What’s Left of America Ep. 158: In this episode of the Conservative Conscience, we speak the truth about the severity of the judicial crisis, how it happened, what is happening now that makes this issue an emergency, why it won’t be fixed with traditional methods, how conservative legal elites have screwed us, and what we can do about it. We begin by addressing almost a dozen mind-boggling decisions by the courts recently and how they are shutting down our country and nobody is talking about it. Next, we address the stratagem and philosophy behind what they are doing and how it will succeed no matter how many new judges Trump appoints. Finally, we conclude with a lesson on the difference between judicial review and judicial supremacy, how “conservative” legal activists are part of the problem and misunderstand this lesson, and what we can do to educate people and change course. Key quotes: “If god gave me one political wish, it
byConservative Review with Daniel Horowitz0 ratings0% found this document usefulA Look Back: Judge Kaplan's Opinion On Virginia Roberts V. Prince Andrew Lawsuit (Part 1): A judge's opinion, also referred to as a judicial opinion or court opinion, is a written explanation of the reasoning behind a court's decision in a legal case. When a case is heard and a judgment is rendered, the judge or panel of judges will... Podcast episode
A Look Back: Judge Kaplan's Opinion On Virginia Roberts V. Prince Andrew Lawsuit (Part 1): A judge's opinion, also referred to as a judicial opinion or court opinion, is a written explanation of the reasoning behind a court's decision in a legal case. When a case is heard and a judgment is rendered, the judge or panel of judges will...
byThe Epstein Chronicles0 ratings0% found this document usefulA Look Back: Judge Kaplan's Opinion On Virginia Roberts V. Prince Andrew Lawsuit (Part 3): A judge's opinion, also referred to as a judicial opinion or court opinion, is a written explanation of the reasoning behind a court's decision in a legal case. When a case is heard and a judgment is rendered, the judge or panel of judges will... Podcast episode
A Look Back: Judge Kaplan's Opinion On Virginia Roberts V. Prince Andrew Lawsuit (Part 3): A judge's opinion, also referred to as a judicial opinion or court opinion, is a written explanation of the reasoning behind a court's decision in a legal case. When a case is heard and a judgment is rendered, the judge or panel of judges will...
byThe Epstein Chronicles0 ratings0% found this document usefulA Look Back: Judge Kaplan's Opinion On Virginia Roberts V. Prince Andrew Lawsuit (Part 4): A judge's opinion, also referred to as a judicial opinion or court opinion, is a written explanation of the reasoning behind a court's decision in a legal case. When a case is heard and a judgment is rendered, the judge or panel of judges will... Podcast episode
A Look Back: Judge Kaplan's Opinion On Virginia Roberts V. Prince Andrew Lawsuit (Part 4): A judge's opinion, also referred to as a judicial opinion or court opinion, is a written explanation of the reasoning behind a court's decision in a legal case. When a case is heard and a judgment is rendered, the judge or panel of judges will...
byThe Epstein Chronicles0 ratings0% found this document useful056: How I Became a Judge with Chief Judge Mark W. Klingensmith: Have you ever wondered how it feels to wear a judge's robes and make decisions that impact lives? Or pondered the challenges faced by an appellate judge in aligning their decisions with the body of law without causing unintended consequences? On... Podcast episode
056: How I Became a Judge with Chief Judge Mark W. Klingensmith: Have you ever wondered how it feels to wear a judge's robes and make decisions that impact lives? Or pondered the challenges faced by an appellate judge in aligning their decisions with the body of law without causing unintended consequences? On...
byGreat Practice. Great Life. by Atticus™ Helping attorneys grow thriving practices, increase revenue, lower stress, and achieve a work/life balance.0 ratings0% found this document usefulA Look Back: Judge Kaplan's Opinion On Virginia Roberts V. Prince Andrew Lawsuit (Part 2): A judge's opinion, also referred to as a judicial opinion or court opinion, is a written explanation of the reasoning behind a court's decision in a legal case. When a case is heard and a judgment is rendered, the judge or panel of judges will... Podcast episode
A Look Back: Judge Kaplan's Opinion On Virginia Roberts V. Prince Andrew Lawsuit (Part 2): A judge's opinion, also referred to as a judicial opinion or court opinion, is a written explanation of the reasoning behind a court's decision in a legal case. When a case is heard and a judgment is rendered, the judge or panel of judges will...
byThe Epstein Chronicles0 ratings0% found this document usefulBiden Promised a Black Woman Supreme Court Nominee. Now What? (with Zinelle October, Franita Tolson, Steve Vladeck, and Danielle Holley-Walker) Podcast episode
Biden Promised a Black Woman Supreme Court Nominee. Now What? (with Zinelle October, Franita Tolson, Steve Vladeck, and Danielle Holley-Walker)
byOn The Issues With Michele Goodwin0 ratings0% found this document usefulRoad to Confirmation: Biden Nominates Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson! What's Next? (with Danielle Holley-Walker) Podcast episode
Road to Confirmation: Biden Nominates Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson! What's Next? (with Danielle Holley-Walker)
byOn The Issues With Michele Goodwin0 ratings0% found this document useful56: Could Veteran Treatment Courts be the Key to Unlocking Criminal Justice Reforms? with David Pelletier: Today on the show, Hunter is joined by David Pelletier, a Project Director in the Justice for Veterans division of the National Association of Drug Court Professionals, to discuss Veteran Treatment Courts. Founded by a lone judge in Buffalo, New York,... Podcast episode
56: Could Veteran Treatment Courts be the Key to Unlocking Criminal Justice Reforms? with David Pelletier: Today on the show, Hunter is joined by David Pelletier, a Project Director in the Justice for Veterans division of the National Association of Drug Court Professionals, to discuss Veteran Treatment Courts. Founded by a lone judge in Buffalo, New York,...
byPublic Defenseless0 ratings0% found this document useful#072: D. Todd Smith & Jody Sanders - Texas Appellate Lawyers & Podcast Hosts of the Texas Appellate Law Podcast Podcast episode
#072: D. Todd Smith & Jody Sanders - Texas Appellate Lawyers & Podcast Hosts of the Texas Appellate Law Podcast
byHow I Lawyer Podcast with Jonah Perlin0 ratings0% found this document usefulRevocation Proceedings Examining the Role of the Prosecutor Podcast episode
Revocation Proceedings Examining the Role of the Prosecutor
byOral Arguments of the Supreme Court of Virginia0 ratings0% found this document useful22. Pretrial Advocacy, with Reuben Guttman and J.C. Lore 0 ratings0% found this document usefulThe Future of the Past: Fifty years of controversial jurisprudence have followed Roe v. Wade, and now the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in a case that many see as this story’s reckoning: Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization. In our last episode Professor Amar i... Podcast episode
The Future of the Past: Fifty years of controversial jurisprudence have followed Roe v. Wade, and now the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in a case that many see as this story’s reckoning: Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization. In our last episode Professor Amar i...
byAmarica's Constitution0 ratings0% found this document useful114 — Nick Rowley — Relentless Drive & Brutal Honesty: Billion-dollar victories. Legal revolutionary. Philanthropist. Countless awards. Author. Nick Rowley is a tireless warrior for justice and one of the most accomplished trial lawyers of his generation. Nick's unbridled tenacity — matched only by his defiance — was ingrained by childhood adversity. Podcast episode
114 — Nick Rowley — Relentless Drive & Brutal Honesty: Billion-dollar victories. Legal revolutionary. Philanthropist. Countless awards. Author. Nick Rowley is a tireless warrior for justice and one of the most accomplished trial lawyers of his generation. Nick's unbridled tenacity — matched only by his defiance — was ingrained by childhood adversity.
byThe Game Changing Attorney Podcast with Michael Mogill0 ratings0% found this document useful
Related articles
For My Incarcerated Clients, There Is No Winning The Marshall ProjectArticle
For My Incarcerated Clients, There Is No Winning
Oct 18, 2019
Tears were streaming down the man’s face, and the interview room in which we’d been sitting across from each other didn’t have any tissues. Life Inside Perspectives from those who work and live in the criminal justice system. Relate
5 min readA Step Toward Better Justice: Prying Open The ‘Black Box’ Of Plea Deals The Christian Science MonitorArticle
A Step Toward Better Justice: Prying Open The ‘Black Box’ Of Plea Deals
Jan 12, 2022
5 min readWhat The Supreme Court Does In The Shadows The AtlanticArticle
What The Supreme Court Does In The Shadows
May 2, 2023
9 min readThe Juror's Job Cobblestone American History and Current Events for Kids and ChildrenArticle
The Juror's Job
May 1, 2023
4 min readWhy Tennessee Is Challenging the DOJ's Ethics The Marshall ProjectArticle
Why Tennessee Is Challenging the DOJ's Ethics
Aug 14, 2018
The Justice Department has picked a fight with an obscure ethics agency in Tennessee about how much evidence — called “discovery” — federal prosecutors should have to hand over to defense attorneys there. It’s the kind of little-noticed move the depa
5 min readTrials Have Become An Endangered Species. A New Effort Is Trying To Change That NPRArticle
Trials Have Become An Endangered Species. A New Effort Is Trying To Change That
May 3, 2023
4 min readThe Supreme Court And Beyond, How Partisan Are America's Judges? The Christian Science MonitorArticle
The Supreme Court And Beyond, How Partisan Are America's Judges?
Oct 1, 2018
10 min readThe Day I Didn’t Serve on a Jury in a Sex Assault Case The Marshall ProjectArticle
The Day I Didn’t Serve on a Jury in a Sex Assault Case
Apr 5, 2019
“As I left the courthouse it dawned on me that the judge had assumed the role of therapist.”
4 min read‘Well, Is There Blood on the Street?’ The AtlanticArticle
‘Well, Is There Blood on the Street?’
Apr 2, 2023
7 min readAbortion Ruling And The Supreme Court’s Shadow Docket The Christian Science MonitorArticle
Abortion Ruling And The Supreme Court’s Shadow Docket
Sep 2, 2021
An abortion decision with no oral arguments or lower court rulings? The Supreme Court is using its shadow docket for cases with potentially far-reaching implications.
5 min readThe Plan to Incapacitate the Federal Government The AtlanticArticle
The Plan to Incapacitate the Federal Government
Jan 24, 2024
6 min readAssuring The High Court’s Integrity The Christian Science MonitorArticle
Assuring The High Court’s Integrity
May 4, 2022
Outside the U.S. Supreme Court this week, passions ran high over the leak of a draft opinion that – if final – would overturn Roe v. Wade. Nationwide, those on either side of the landmark 1973 ruling quickly jumped into the bear pit of political comb
2 min readWhy U.S. Criminal Courts Are So Dependent on Plea Bargaining The AtlanticArticle
Why U.S. Criminal Courts Are So Dependent on Plea Bargaining
May 2, 2017
7 min readA Single Judge Shouldn’t Have This Kind of National Power The AtlanticArticle
A Single Judge Shouldn’t Have This Kind of National Power
Apr 14, 2023
6 min readWhat Gorsuch, Kavanaugh and Barrett Said About Roe at Confirmation Hearings FactCheck.orgArticle
What Gorsuch, Kavanaugh and Barrett Said About Roe at Confirmation Hearings
May 9, 2022
12 min readMinority Report: How Justices From Harlan To Breyer Shaped Legal Opinion The Christian Science MonitorArticle
Minority Report: How Justices From Harlan To Breyer Shaped Legal Opinion
Jan 27, 2022
With Justice Stephen Breyer announcing his retirement Thursday, his replacement will follow in the footsteps of every justice before them by taking their place on the lowest rung of the highest court in the land. This new justice – early favorites in
4 min readTo Try Or Not To Try — Remotely. As Jury Trials Move Online, Courts See Pros And Cons NPRArticle
To Try Or Not To Try — Remotely. As Jury Trials Move Online, Courts See Pros And Cons
Mar 18, 2022
9 min readNot Everyone Is Happy With the Supreme Court’s Live Broadcasts The AtlanticArticle
Not Everyone Is Happy With the Supreme Court’s Live Broadcasts
May 12, 2020
5 min readWhat GOP-named Justices Had Said About Roe To Senate Panel The IndependentArticle
What GOP-named Justices Had Said About Roe To Senate Panel
Jun 25, 2022
4 min readToo ‘Woke’ for the Jury Box? The Marshall ProjectArticle
Too ‘Woke’ for the Jury Box?
May 3, 2018
Constitutional law requires that jurors be impartial. They must fairly evaluate evidence and wait until the end of the trial to decide on a defendant's guilt in a criminal case. That’s easier said than done, especially of late. I’ve chosen well over
2 min readWhen Your Judge Isn't A Lawyer The AtlanticArticle
When Your Judge Isn't A Lawyer
Feb 5, 2017
5 min readWhat Comes After Roe? The AtlanticArticle
What Comes After Roe?
Jul 1, 2022
15 min readSupreme Court Hearings Are Broken, Both Parties Say. How They Can Be Fixed. The Christian Science MonitorArticle
Supreme Court Hearings Are Broken, Both Parties Say. How They Can Be Fixed.
Sep 7, 2018
Senators of both parties complain that Supreme Court hearings today yield little useful information, with nominees wary of saying anything that might look like prejudging a case. But experts cite past examples that could foster greater insight – and
5 min readKavanaugh’s Exercise of Discretion The AtlanticArticle
Kavanaugh’s Exercise of Discretion
Jul 11, 2018
3 min readRobin Abcarian: Does Recalling The Judge Who Gave Brock Turner A Light Sentence For Sexual Assault Imperil Judicial Independence? Los Angeles TimesArticle
Robin Abcarian: Does Recalling The Judge Who Gave Brock Turner A Light Sentence For Sexual Assault Imperil Judicial Independence?
Feb 14, 2018
3 min readAs High Court Term Begins, Trump Reshapes Federal Judiciary From Top to Bottom The Christian Science MonitorArticle
As High Court Term Begins, Trump Reshapes Federal Judiciary From Top to Bottom
Oct 2, 2017
The 'Trump effect' on law will begin to be felt in earnest during the high court’s term that begins Monday, with big cases on religious freedom, partisan gerrymandering, and unions. But the rapid pace of the president's judicial nominations could hav
5 min readThe Constitutional Right We Have Bargained Away The AtlanticArticle
The Constitutional Right We Have Bargained Away
Dec 24, 2021
5 min readSupreme Court Arguments Resume — But With A Twist NPRArticle
Supreme Court Arguments Resume — But With A Twist
May 4, 2020
Beginning Monday, for the first time in the Supreme Court's 231-year history, the justices will hear oral arguments by phone in a slate of important cases.
2 min readWhat To Expect At Jury Selection For Trump’s Criminal Trial The IndependentArticle
What To Expect At Jury Selection For Trump’s Criminal Trial
Apr 16, 2024
6 min readCan Roberts Steer Supreme Court Safely Through Abortion Case Crisis? The Christian Science MonitorArticle
Can Roberts Steer Supreme Court Safely Through Abortion Case Crisis?
May 24, 2022
What can a chief justice bring to the U.S. Supreme Court that an associate justice cannot? In September 2005, John Roberts, then a nominee for that position, answered that he would “try to bring about a greater degree of coherence and consensus in th
7 min read
Reviews for The Texas Jury Rules
0 ratings0 reviews