Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

Petition for Certiorari – Patent Case 99-396 - Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(h)(3) Patent Assignment Statute 35 USC 261
Petition for Certiorari – Patent Case 99-396 - Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(h)(3) Patent Assignment Statute 35 USC 261
Petition for Certiorari – Patent Case 99-396 - Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(h)(3) Patent Assignment Statute 35 USC 261
Ebook26 pages18 minutes

Petition for Certiorari – Patent Case 99-396 - Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(h)(3) Patent Assignment Statute 35 USC 261

Rating: 0 out of 5 stars

()

Read preview

About this ebook

Does a federal court have an obligation to actually litigate and finally determine its jurisdiction to void, assign, and sell patents under California state laws when the issue of such jurisdiction is raised by a party?
Can the inferior courts constitutionally decide a case against debtor without actually litigating and finally deciding issues presented to them by debtor for the first time?

LanguageEnglish
Release dateJul 5, 2013
ISBN9781301344284
Petition for Certiorari – Patent Case 99-396 - Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(h)(3) Patent Assignment Statute 35 USC 261
Author

James Constant

writes on law, government, mathematics and science, as they are and as they should be

Read more from James Constant

Related to Petition for Certiorari – Patent Case 99-396 - Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(h)(3) Patent Assignment Statute 35 USC 261

Titles in the series (10)

View More

Related ebooks

Constitutional Law For You

View More

Related articles

Reviews for Petition for Certiorari – Patent Case 99-396 - Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(h)(3) Patent Assignment Statute 35 USC 261

Rating: 0 out of 5 stars
0 ratings

0 ratings0 reviews

What did you think?

Tap to rate

Review must be at least 10 words

    Book preview

    Petition for Certiorari – Patent Case 99-396 - Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(h)(3) Patent Assignment Statute 35 USC 261 - James Constant

    Petition for Certiorari – Patent Case 99-396

    - Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(h)(3)

    Patent Assignment Statute 35 USC 261

    By James Constant

    Smashwords Edition

    Copyright © 1999 by James Constant

    Smashwords Edition, License Notes

    This ebook is licensed for your personal enjoyment only. This ebook may not be re-sold or given away to other people. If you would like to share this book with another person, please purchase an additional copy for each recipient. If you’re reading this book and did not purchase it, or it was not purchased for your use only, then please return to Smashwords.com and purchase your own copy. Thank you for respecting the hard work of this author.

    No. 99-396

    IN THE

    SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

    OCTOBER TERM, 1999

    __________________________________________

    In Re: JAMES CONSTANT,

    Debtor,

    ______________________________________________

    JAMES CONSTANT

    Petitioner,

    V.

    DAVID L. RAY, Trustee;

    ADVANCED MICRO-DEVICES, INC.

    et. als,

    Respondents.

    _________________________________________________

    PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

    TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

    James Constant

    Pro-per Petitioner

    i

    QUESTIONS PRESENTED

    Does a federal court have an obligation to actually litigate and finally determine its jurisdiction to void, assign, and sell patents under California state laws when the issue of such jurisdiction is raised by a party?

    Can the inferior courts constitutionally decide a case against debtor without actually litigating and finally deciding issues presented to them by debtor for the first time?

    ii

    LIST OF

    Enjoying the preview?
    Page 1 of 1