Petition for Certiorari – Patent Case 99-396 - Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(h)(3) Patent Assignment Statute 35 USC 261
()
About this ebook
Does a federal court have an obligation to actually litigate and finally determine its jurisdiction to void, assign, and sell patents under California state laws when the issue of such jurisdiction is raised by a party?
Can the inferior courts constitutionally decide a case against debtor without actually litigating and finally deciding issues presented to them by debtor for the first time?
James Constant
writes on law, government, mathematics and science, as they are and as they should be
Read more from James Constant
Related to Petition for Certiorari – Patent Case 99-396 - Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(h)(3) Patent Assignment Statute 35 USC 261
Titles in the series (10)
Questions Presented Supreme Court Cases Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPetition for Certiorari: Denied Without Opinion Patent Case 93-1413 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPetition for Certiorari Denied Without Opinion: Patent Case 93-1518 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPetition for Extraordinary Writ Denied Without Opinion– Patent Case 94-1257 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPetition for Certiorari Denied Without Opinion: Patent Case 96-1178 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPetition for Certiorari Denied Without Opinion: Patent Case 98-1972. Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPetition for Certiorari – Patent Case 01-438 - Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 52(a) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPetition for Certiorari – Patent Case 99-396 - Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(h)(3) Patent Assignment Statute 35 USC 261 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPetition for Certiorari Denied Without Opinion: Patent Case 98-1151 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related ebooks
Supreme Court Petition No 10-1275 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Book of Writs - With Sample Writs of Quo Warranto, Habeas Corpus, Mandamus, Certiorari, and Prohibition Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5How one of my Pro-se cases got destroyed by federal rogue judges Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPetition for Certiorari – Patent Case 01-438 - Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 52(a) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAn Inexplicable Deception: A State Corruption of Justice Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPetition for Certiorari Denied Without Opinion: Patent Case 98-1151 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPetition for Extraordinary Writ Denied Without Opinion– Patent Case 94-1257 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsStop Judicial Abuse Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCourts and Procedure in England and in New Jersey Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsKeeter & Sinquefield's Habeas Cite Book Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHow to Process a Legal Appeal Successfully Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCivil Appellate Practice in the Minnesota Court of Appeals Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Petition for Certiorari Denied Without Opinion: Patent Case 96-1178 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsYour Day in Court: Using Common Law with Common Sense Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Petition for Certiorari: Denied Without Opinion Patent Case 93-1413 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSpecializing the Courts Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsConstitutional Law: Essential Law Self Teaching Guide Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSupreme Court Eminent Domain Case 09-381 Denied Without Opinion Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsShocking Judgements Delivered by the Supreme Court of United States: Full Text Judgements with Summary Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTort Reform: A Study in Frustration Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsContract Law in America: A Social and Economic Case Study Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLegal Forms for Everyone Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Principles of Pleading and Practice in Civil Actions in the High Court of Justice Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Harvard Law Review: Volume 131, Number 2 - December 2017 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFRAUD ON—and in—THE COURT Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsUnderstanding Your Right to Due Process Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMotion To Dismiss: Kali O'Brien legal suspense, #3 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Constitutional Law For You
U.S. Constitution For Dummies Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5An Introduction to Legal Reasoning Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGet Trump: The Threat to Civil Liberties, Due Process, and Our Constitutional Rule of Law Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Constitution of the United States of America: 1787 (Annotated) Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Constitutional Law Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5A Student's Guide to the Study of Law Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Allow Me to Retort: A Black Guy’s Guide to the Constitution Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Unwarranted: Policing Without Permission Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Second Amendment: A Biography Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Brethren: Inside the Supreme Court Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Constitutional Law For Dummies Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Supremes' Greatest Hits: The 44 Supreme Court Cases That Most Directly Affect Your Life Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Heritage Guide to the Constitution: Fully Revised Second Edition Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsUnequal Protection: How Corporations Became "People"—and How You Can Fight Back Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Supermajority: How the Supreme Court Divided America Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMy Grandfather's Son: A Memoir Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Bill of Rights Primer: A Citizen's Guidebook to the American Bill of Rights Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsJustice Corrupted: How the Left Weaponized Our Legal System Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5The Constitution of the United States: Including The Declaration of Independence and The Bill of Rights Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Kindly Inquisitors: The New Attacks on Free Thought Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The U.S. Constitution and Related Documents Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLiberty and Sexuality: The Right to Privacy and the Making of Roe v. Wade Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Gangs of America: The Rise of Corporate Power and the Disabling of Democracy Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5From Covid To Communism: Chronicling the Global Assault on Our Freedom and What to Do About It. Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFederal Tax Returns Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLoaded: A Disarming History of the Second Amendment Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Reason in Law Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsConstitutional Law, Law Essentials: Governing Law for Law School and Bar Exam Prep Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Federalist Papers Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Matter of Interpretation: Federal Courts and the Law - New Edition Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for Petition for Certiorari – Patent Case 99-396 - Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(h)(3) Patent Assignment Statute 35 USC 261
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
Petition for Certiorari – Patent Case 99-396 - Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(h)(3) Patent Assignment Statute 35 USC 261 - James Constant
Petition for Certiorari – Patent Case 99-396
- Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(h)(3)
Patent Assignment Statute 35 USC 261
By James Constant
Smashwords Edition
Copyright © 1999 by James Constant
Smashwords Edition, License Notes
This ebook is licensed for your personal enjoyment only. This ebook may not be re-sold or given away to other people. If you would like to share this book with another person, please purchase an additional copy for each recipient. If you’re reading this book and did not purchase it, or it was not purchased for your use only, then please return to Smashwords.com and purchase your own copy. Thank you for respecting the hard work of this author.
No. 99-396
IN THE
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
OCTOBER TERM, 1999
__________________________________________
In Re: JAMES CONSTANT,
Debtor,
______________________________________________
JAMES CONSTANT
Petitioner,
V.
DAVID L. RAY, Trustee;
ADVANCED MICRO-DEVICES, INC.
et. als,
Respondents.
_________________________________________________
PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI
TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
James Constant
Pro-per Petitioner
i
QUESTIONS PRESENTED
Does a federal court have an obligation to actually litigate and finally determine its jurisdiction to void, assign, and sell patents under California state laws when the issue of such jurisdiction is raised by a party?
Can the inferior courts constitutionally decide a case against debtor without actually litigating and finally deciding issues presented to them by debtor for the first time?
ii
LIST OF