Everand Logo

Welcome to Everand!

  • Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

    Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

    The Second Great Contraction: From This Time Is Different
    The Second Great Contraction: From This Time Is Different
    The Second Great Contraction: From This Time Is Different
    Ebook113 pages1 hour

    The Second Great Contraction: From This Time Is Different

    By Carmen M. Reinhart and Kenneth S. Rogoff

    3.5/5

    ()

    Read preview

    About this ebook

    We've been assured that the recession is over, but the country and the economy continue to feel the effects of the 2008 financial crisis, and people are still searching for answers about what caused it, what it has wrought, and how we can recover. This selection from the best-selling book This Time Is Different—the definitive history of financial crises, including the recent subprime meltdown—answers these questions and more.

    Princeton Shorts are brief selections excerpted from influential Princeton University Press publications produced exclusively in eBook format. They are selected with the firm belief that while the original work remains an important and enduring product, sometimes we can all benefit from a quick take on a topic worthy of a longer book.

    In a world where every second counts, how better to stay up-to speed on current events and digest the kernels of wisdom found in the great works of the past? Princeton Shorts enables you to be an instant expert in a world where information is everywhere but quality is at a premium. The Second Great Contraction does just that.

    LanguageEnglish
    PublisherPrinceton University Press
    Release dateJul 18, 2011
    ISBN9781400841127
    The Second Great Contraction: From This Time Is Different

    Read more from Carmen M. Reinhart

    Related to The Second Great Contraction

    Titles in the series (8)

    View More
    View More

    Related ebooks

    Finance & Money Management For You

    View More
    View More

    Related podcast episodes

    Related articles

    • Article

      A Conversation with a Short Seller

      Aug 18, 2020

      A short seller leads a lonely life, it seems. Short sellers profit from stocks that decline in value. So, when they win, it means that most of their friends and family are likely losing. And when they lose? Well … they don't generally get a lot of sy

      4 min read

    • Article

      Follow The Capital Cycle

      Feb 4, 2022

      Right now, it says oil firms are cheap The capital cycle is an extremely useful investment concept. The best read on it is probably Capital Account by Edward Chancellor and Marathon Asset Management. But the good news is that like lots of useful inv

      2 min read

    • Article

      Stock Market Today: Tech Rallies, Nasdaq Just Shy of New Highs

      Jun 17, 2021

      The Nasdaq Composite pressed higher Thursday, to within just a few points of a fresh closing record, flipping the script on how the technology-heavy index has acted for much of 2021. The Federal Reserve yesterday revealed higher expectations for infl

      2 min read

    • Article

      How To Spot A Financial Bubble

      Oct 2, 2020

      one of the most influential mathematicians of all time, Sir Isaac Newton, lost a fortune by investing in the South Sea Bubble of 1720. When asked why, with all his mathematical prowess, he could not foresee the collapse of the stock, he is reputed to

      3 min read

    • Article

      Portfolio For The Common Man

      Jan 17, 2019

      Portfolio For The Common Man
      5 min read

    • Article

      Viewpoint

      Aug 25, 2023

      “Growth will be… harder to achieve in the future… [Ageing populations are driving a]… shortage of workers… and thus [higher] real wages… Over the past 20 years… geopolitics have [taken a back seat, but today] globalisation… has stalled… the world has

      1 min read

    • Article

      Why the Flash Crash Really Matters: The debate about what caused the 2010 stock market Flash Crash is missing the point.

      Apr 23, 2015

      At about 2:30pm on May 6, 2010, an asset management firm began executing a series of orders on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange. Located in Overland Park, Kansas, Waddell & Reed was (and is) one of the oldest mutual fund companies in America. It follo

      8 min read

    • Article

      Why the Conventional Wisdom about the 2008 Financial Crisis Is Still Wrong: Ten Years Later

      Jul 1, 2020

      By Paul D. Mueller Newcastle upon Tyne, U.K.: Cambridge Scholars, 2019. Pp. viii, 189. $58.99 hardcover. The idea of writing a retrospective account of the financial crisis ten years out is a good one, and Paul Mueller’s book provides a nice overview

      3 min read

    • Article

      Lessons From a Meltdown | Books

      Jul 12, 2019

      The bankruptcy filing by Lehman Brothers on September 15, 2008, had an even bigger impact on the industrial world than the Great Depression of 1929-39. It also gave rise to a record number of books studying the causes, impact and regulatory lacunae t

      2 min read

    • Article

      You May Be Worrying About the Economy Too Much

      May 25, 2022

      War in Ukraine. Outsized inflation. Supply chain disruptions. A lingering pandemic. Today’s global upheavals all contribute to a sense of general economic anxiety among investors and, more broadly, the American public. The University of Michigan’s Co

      2 min read

    • Article

      Is The IMF Fit For Purpose?

      Nov 11, 2022

      Is The IMF Fit For Purpose?
      15 min read

    • Article

      Investment For The Long Run

      Apr 30, 2020

      keynes’ famous quip that “in the long run, we’re all dead” has been misunderstood for almost a century. Many have interpreted it to mean that he cared little about the future. But that would be a mistake. He used it to explain how the quantity theory

      3 min read

    Related categories

    Reviews for The Second Great Contraction

    3.5/5

    114 ratings8 reviews

    What did you think?

    Tap to rate

    Review must be at least 10 words

    • 2/5
      A decent reference, but a lousy read.
    • 5/5
      This book is a joy if you're the kind of person who likes good statistics and qualitative reasoning. One hundred pages of appendices alone! It's almost beautiful.

      A painstaking analysis of statistics of financial crises throughout history. Some are from the 13th century, yes, but the bulk of the data is from the 19th century onwards. What do they learn?

      1) Debt accumulation brings risk.
      2) Severe financial crises have one of the following: Decline in housing prices, unemployment rises, output falls, government debt rises even higher.
      3) Not all economic predictions are created equal.
      4) Developed nations might be able to avoid and graduate from external debt defaults, but all are still at risk from bank defaults.

      There is certainly more. These are some of the most salient points. I won't say more because 1) the arguments are complicated and 2) I want you to take a look at this. Seriously.

      As for our current crisis? Well, there simply has been little comparison for a global crisis so far. Exports might not be as big an aid for growth as seen before. We are lucky that this is only the worst crisis since the Great Depression.

      A necessary book. Hard mathematical truths. I quote: "We hope that the weight of evidence in this book will give policy makers and investors a bit more pause before they declare, 'This time is different'. It almost never is."
    • 4/5
      "This time is different" offers the data necessary to point out, sorry, you're not so special. I love the books many data tables that include countless stories untold, which is also the book's main weakness. Its great collection and presentation of empiric crisis data makes the missing data on the surrounding political economy all too conspicuous. After all, the sovereign and internal debt crises and banking crises are the result of economic and political mismanagement. Reinhart and Rogoff are in the business of body counting at the scene of the crime. The perpetrators are left out of the picture. Hopefully, somebody will add them soon, although, like unhappy families, it will be difficult to assign them to simple categories. War is certainly one activity that seldom pays and often triggers crises.One puzzle of the book seems to be the lenders' willingness to finance serial defaulters such as Greece. A hard-nosed look at the Greek track record should have discouraged even the most eager banker. In one of The Economist's Xmas issues was a great article about the Russians serially fleecing Western creditors through the centuries. The magic of "This time is different" is unbreakable. One wonders why the continuous currency debasement of most kings (actually an indirect form of taxation) didn't trigger offsetting waves of inflation. How can Reinhart/Rogoff's longterm view be blended into short-term thinking?With two years hindsight, the text offers a good standard overview of sovereign and internal debt crises as well as banking crises. Recommended.
    • 4/5
      Not the ideal book for the electronic format as the numerous tables are hard to read. The content, however, is very good
    • 5/5
      Warning! This is an academic work, not a novel, and is not suitable for casual reading. It is a rigorous, exhaustively documented and very thorough look at the history of financial crisis in world history. In so doing, it compares the warning flags and false economic policy that has perpetuated macroeconomic theory and practice for world countries over past centuries and looks at common trigger events leading to historical meltdowns.The title is a facetious play on words that has led, predictably, to the current economic woes for the U.S. and world markets and economic bases. It takes into account debt, tax revenue and liberal economic policies in the banking industry that have failed to stem the tide. There are hundreds of references to world level economic studies, and anyone who wants to learn what and who pushed us into the present economic state must read this book.
    • 4/5
      This book has been widely praised for its quantitative analysis of financial crises going back 100 years or more, which it uses to put our own current (and very serious) crisis into perspective. It is written for readers with a general knowledge of economics, and the authors suggest those primarily interested in the current crisis start reading at Chapter 13. The first twelve chapters describe and explain the authors' model and seemed designed primarily defend their work within the academy. They will certainly interest economic historians, who in the past have relied on less quantitative analyses such as Charles Kindleberger's classic “Manias, Panics, and Crashes.” Overall, it's an excellent study, and deserves a much wider readership than it will receive.Being good academic economists (rather than policy pundits), the authors are careful in their conclusions, but they take a strong stand on a few issues. One, of course, is that the siren song of “this time is different” always leads to fatal outcomes. They demonstrate that such arguments, whether justifications for huge, destabilizing inflows of foreign investment (which inevitably reverse course at some point) or confident claims that burgeoning debt balances are based on new valuations for risk and investment (and thus are safer than in the past), invariably prove to be wishful thinking. They offer no solutions for this problem; in fact, they are quite pessimistic that such behavior can be changed. As they put it: “The fading memories of borrowers and lenders, policy makers and academics, and the public at large do not seem to improve over time, so the policy lessons on how to 'avoid' the next blow-up are at best limited.” They suggest some useful warning indicators, but doubt they will prevent future crises.A second conclusion takes aim at the “belief in the invincibility of modern monetary institutions,” in particular central banks' obsession in the past few decades with inflation targeting. They are not suggesting that keeping inflation low is a bad thing, but rather that central banks came to view it as an end in itself, a solution to the volatility of the business cycle. What this has meant in practice they illustrate with their description of the “Greenspan put.” That is, “the (empirically well-founded) belief that the U.S. central bank would resist raising interest rates in response to a sharp upward spike in asset prices (and therefore not undo them) but would react vigorously to any sharp fall in asset prices by cutting interest rates to prop them up.” This, the authors conclude, led markets to believe (accurately, as it turned out), that the Fed would do nothing to spoil the party in financial markets, and would bail out the party-goers if things went to hell. They reasonably conclude that “in hindsight, it is now clear that a single-minded focus on inflation can be justified only in an environment in which other regulators are able to ensure that leverage (borrowing) does not become excessive.” Which is another way of saying that inflation-targeting policies become increasingly dangerous as corporate-sponsored deregulation (such as we've witnessed steadily since the 1980s) weakens government supervision.
    • 3/5
      Shorter version: No, it’s not. This data-stuffed book is for people who know/care a lot about macroeconomics. I’m not sure it’s the best for general audiences (e.g., me), but they have looked at a lot of different data sources. The book connects external sovereign debt to internal debt (what the government owes its citizens, including sometimes what it extracts from them by regulating what interest they can earn in banks) and argues that internal debt plays a bigger role in debt crises than has been acknowledged. They also argue that the run-up in sovereign debt that occurs in financial crises owes more to decreased tax receipts than to bailouts, though the costs from the latter are not negligible. But the overriding message is more: everyone thinks that they’ve figured out where past bubbles went wrong, but in reality, when countries pull back on financial regulation, they get big booms that end in big booms.
    • 4/5
      It is hard to imagine that anyone with even the slightest awareness of economic issues has failed to notice two things that have occurred over the last several years: (1) governments around the world have been borrowing breathtaking amounts of money and (2) the central banks in those countries have pumped a profligate amount of new currency into the financial system in order to support that borrowing by keeping interest rates low. Whether you think these actions are remarkable or mundane probably comes down to how you would answer the following question: Does debt—particularly sovereign-level borrowing—really matter?Throughout this engaging volume, noted economists Carmen Reinhart and Kenneth Rogoff make a persuasive case that the answer to that question is a resounding “yes”. Further, the authors argue that how a sovereignty borrows (i.e., from foreign investors or from its own citizens) as well as how it chooses to default on its loans (e.g., currency debasement, inflation propagation, restructured borrowing terms) also matter when it comes to the country’s future growth prospects and access to capital markets. As its title suggests, the overall theme of the book is that governments and investors alike keep repeating the mistaken economic policies of the past under the assumption that “this time is different” (e.g., the more sophisticated market structures today allow us to control economic outcomes better than in the past, so we can borrow more without consequence). Using a dizzying array of data tables and charts, Reinhart and Rogoff examine the causes and aftermaths of several hundred years of financial crises and sovereign-level defaults and end up concluding that, in fact, this time is not different in ways that ultimately matter. They finish their analysis with a discussion of the root causes of the recent sub-prime debt crisis, which they term the Second Great Contraction (after the Great Depression of the 1930s). I should note that neither the subject matter nor the expositional style in this book makes for the easiest reading experience. That said, though, the authors do a very nice job in the volume of taking an extraordinary amount of primary academic research—much of it their own—and translating into a more digestible form. There are definitely redundancies throughout the various topics they cover, but Reinhart and Rogoff provide the reader with considerable guidance as to what sections or chapters can be skipped without loss of continuity. Overall, I found this to be a well-executed book with an important message to convey about the current state of global economic affairs.

    Book preview

    The Second Great Contraction - Carmen M. Reinhart

    1^book_preview_excerpt.htmlYmr7 ?v*)ْE[LJb%'8rcC;#5(9ɾn`/WbFׯ['DL'WćL ~lv}v>LOKi('ϮgB\4>)_}z/Լə|}qy>aǫTxU,hkJ LWJ\xN/)oWJ̕2Bz8PȀ)T])7&~aʬMЦQ"XP_,`6dZ"sk?jeR A%.#]Vh įB-XlSnV: >]]ɥ_{ /YRbPa}(F}B\R/ͱt]ŋԾ\^2^~Mӎz1_ Oaȧן!D623"G'{ݓEo)Pld~d$"&gϾ>XvsEͅ*kϵk@ ]ފJM^d,-U>|yQ)q.>-8;9pSbtWGc*>ϵbBwCYD|{[>UhM!]1 |C KX#'cK)Z c]AM@!mqlK5  j%g-_ |e FղBRn@\¸8t0H/7Ox-@Zy9UB#W즫2'3 t0 &&?빓*$KvUjй,QQHdHB\3X1\Dx0۵?n7n;E;<ǂNd}m4&q4x z(tѢj}t.TQؖL\mߚo_{;ߌ{t0y-9B(D{پ:" s4>@sPOVtۻ[qCa6Y^dg$uW1{?x~A*|Ab. +阕$e7b2kJ-yPA2- poLV>댾KjJT}e!2p^FSC<\AMEeSG!*.σK/PВ0e^zKY :ms/}b'v^@怷D[nFg ق9 k5"!b\td)H6A*c#yZ_˘m#Ք gR2MaxԜS>AL KeYJs ~"Ԩশjєm׏:6\C^@DQ%V /FI-"@[Z3UbpVh8̜ME8MU4H=_i o`=zs?,BUƄ˩%0رޢ#7 Bvwq>9V/5W_/oы}Ogn.Yz4|z|phW@v~R}rVP~80o`4y#U\&9 !B9w>+NTZ"ٹGɧ 䔏ykNS։S$*0mӖ&M -$L, 7(15 u/u(@!9[ ;@W%JL* IEj' 6#]CT%{z*u,O)P\2mE uYEC6ϹmZ`*U 6%»D`n.}SU`FjI8O#֑h#9A1HDeH<׬Zq&XUDIw˾mC fXڞN"@ Л^!ܦèFAT Ƹ=ޓEs:ݪ ӵ='.43e_hsMr"+ߣ!-o AC+JR#_!P9FH[X+*ayzm {if^"o9קSD7xBE# Y1UL0q1 x eZݑp]Ys]4$Jp ʅ/%^/Yyx >q%%Uk},[k|}T7AfS%~TӆnD*,BP.2qNFtMKXHÐP&+QQgTN'P3Ö6n/\*E StLg*G[|df VVR㊰9 
    Enjoying the preview?
    Page 1 of 1