Discovering South Carolina's Rock Art
()
About this ebook
An adventure tale of archaeological research, discovery, and preservation in the South Carolina upcountry.
For years Tommy Charles searched South Carolina's upcountry for examples of ancient rock art carvings and paintings, efforts conducted on behalf of the South Carolina Institute of Archaeology and Anthropology (SCIAA). As SCIAA's collections coordinator, Charles amassed considerable field experience in both prehistoric and historic archaeology and had firsthand involvement in cataloging sixty-four sites of South Carolina rock art. Charles chronicles his adventures in exploration and preservation in Discovering South Carolina's Rock Art.
Although Native American rock art is common in the western United States and even at many sites east of the Mississippi, it was believed to be almost nonexistent in South Carolina until the 1980s, when several randomly discovered petroglyphs were reported in the upstate. These discoveries set in motion the first organized endeavor to identify and document these ancient examples of human expression in South Carolina. Over the ensuing years, and assisted by a host of volunteers and avocational collectors, Charles scoured the Piedmont and mountains of South Carolina in search of additional rock art. Frustrated by the inability to find these elusive artifacts, many of which are eroded almost beyond visibility, Charles began employing methods still considered unorthodox by current scientific standards for archaeological research to assist with his search and documentation.
Survey efforts led to the discovery of rock art created by Native Americans and Europeans. Of particular interest are the many circle-and-line petroglyphs the survey found in South Carolina. Seeking a reason for this repetitive symbol, Charles's investigation into these finds led to the discovery that similar motifs had been identified along the Appalachian Mountains from Alabama to New York, as well as in the American Southwest and Western Europe.
This engrossing account of the search for South Carolina's rock art brings awareness to the precarious state of these artifacts, threatened not only by natural attrition but also by human activities. Charles argues that, if left unprotected, rock art is ultimately doomed to exist only in our historical records.
Tommy Charles
A native of Union, South Carolina, Tommy Charles began his interest in archaeology as a child. In 1979 Charles joined the South Carolina Institute of Archaeology and Anthropology (SCIAA), a research arm of the University of South Carolina. He has participated in many research projects over the years, and in 1993 he joined the SCIAA Research Division to pursue his research interests in prehistoric Native American culture. Now retired, Charles continues his own research in the South Carolina upstate.
Related to Discovering South Carolina's Rock Art
Related ebooks
Transforming the Landscape: Rock Art and the Mississippian Cosmos Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPetroglyphs, Pictographs, and Projections: Native American Rock Art in the Contemporary Cultural Landscape Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRock Art in an Indigenous Landscape: From Atlantic Canada to Chesapeake Bay Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMaking Pictures in Stone: American Indian Rock Art of the Northeast Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAmulets, Effigies, Fetishes, and Charms: Native American Artifacts and Spirit Stones from the Northeast Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsArchaeology in South Carolina: Exploring the Hidden Heritage of the Palmetto State Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Southeastern Ceremonial Complex: Chronology, Content, Contest Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Rock-Art of Eastern North America: Capturing Images and Insight Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGreat and Noble Jar: Traditional Stoneware of South Carolina Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNeolithic cave burials: Agency, structure and environment Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSunWatch: Fort Ancient Development in the Mississippian World Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHistorical Archaeology in the Cortez Mining District: Under the Nevada Giant Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGreat Basin Rock Art: Archaeological Perspectives Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Prehistoric Textile Art of Eastern United States Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTechnological Approach to Lithic Artifacts from Yukon Territory Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDown By the River: Archaeological, Palaeoenvironmental and Geoarchaeological Investigations of The Suffolk River Valleys Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLandscapes of Ritual Performance in Eastern North America Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPrehistoric rock art in Scandinavia: Agency and Environmental Change Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFlint Daggers in Prehistoric Europe Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAncient Architecture of the Southwest Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Moundville Expeditions of Clarence Bloomfield Moore: Clarence Bloomfield Moore Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMound Sites of the Ancient South: A Guide to the Mississippian Chiefdoms Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The American Indian in North Carolina Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPottery and Porcelain, from early times down to the Philadelphia exhibition of 1876 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMountain Passages: Natural and Cultural History of Western North Carolina and the Great Smoky Mountains Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLight from Ancient Campfires: Archaeological Evidence for Native Lifeways on the Northern Plains Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A New Deal for Southeastern Archaeology Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLithic Technologies in Sedentary Societies Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Pueblo of Yesterday and Today: The History and Culture of the Anasazi and Hopi Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsContemporary Archaeologies of the Southwest Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Archaeology For You
Sex and Erotism in Ancient Egypt Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Lehi and Sariah in Arabia: The Old World Setting of the Book of Mormon Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFifty Things You Need to Know About World History Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Epic of Gilgamesh Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Anunnaki Chronicles: A Zecharia Sitchin Reader Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/51177 B.C.: The Year Civilization Collapsed: Revised and Updated Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Mound Builders Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Excavations at Ur Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Underwater Ghost Towns of North Georgia Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Earth Chronicles Handbook: A Comprehensive Guide to the Seven Books of The Earth Chronicles Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Mystery of the Olmecs Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Memory Code Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Atlantis Pyramids Floods: Why Europeans are White Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Incas Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Critical Perspectives on Cultural Memory and Heritage: Construction, Transformation and Destruction Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHow to Survive in Ancient Egypt Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Fifth Beginning: What Six Million Years of Human History Can Tell Us about Our Future Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Talking Taino: Caribbean Natural History from a Native Perspective Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Kindred: Neanderthal Life, Love, Death and Art Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Omm Sety's Egypt: A Story of Ancient Mysteries, Secret Lives, and the Lost History of the Pharaohs Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Black Tudors: The Untold Story Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Indian New England Before the Mayflower Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Writing of the Gods: The Race to Decode the Rosetta Stone Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Disinformation Guide to Ancient Aliens, Lost Civilizations, Astonishing Archaeology & Hidden History Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAmerica Before: The Key to Earth's Lost Civilization Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Past Crimes: Archaeological & Historical Evidence for Ancient Misdeeds Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Lost King: The Search for Richard III Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Related categories
Reviews for Discovering South Carolina's Rock Art
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
Discovering South Carolina's Rock Art - Tommy Charles
Discovering South Carolina’s Rock Art
DISCOVERING
South Carolina’s Rock Art
Tommy Charles
© 2010 University of South Carolina
Cloth edition published by the University of South Carolina Press, 2010
Ebook edition published in Columbia, South Carolina,
by the University of South Carolina Press, 2012
www.sc.edu/uscpress
21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
The Library of Congress has cataloged the cloth edition as follows:
Charles, Tommy.
Discovering South Carolina’s rock art / Tommy Charles.
p. cm.
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN 978-1-57003-921-8 (cloth : alk. paper)
1. Rock paintings—South Carolina. 2. Petroglyphs—South Carolina. 3. Indians of North America—South Carolina—Antiquities. 4. South Carolina—Antiquities. I. Title.
E78.S6C43 2010
975.7’01—dc22 2010008306
ISBN 978-1-61117-212-6 (ebook)
This book is dedicated to the citizens of South Carolina who have given generously of their time, effort, and economic and moral support toward the ongoing search to discover and learn about, and from, our state’s hidden cultural treasures.
Contents
List of Illustrations
Preface
Acknowledgments
Introduction: What Is Rock Art?
1. The Survey
2. Rock-Art Motifs
3. Portable Petroglyphs
4. Circle-and-Line Petroglyphs
5. Historic-Period Rock Art
6. Prehistoric Pictographs
Conclusion
References
Index
Illustrations
Figures
1. South Carolina counties in which rock art was recorded
2. The first petroglyph site recorded for South Carolina (38GR9)
3. The Pardo stone
4. South Carolina physiographic zones
5. Locations of South Carolina rock-art sites
6. Inspecting rock domes for petroglyphs
7. Approximate elevations at which most South Carolina rock art occurs
8. Areas where high- and low-elevation sites were recorded
9. A typical circle-petroglyph site (38PN122) on a high rock dome
10. Natural circles created by water erosion
11. A petroglyph revealed by artificial lighting at night
12. Mapping excavated site 38PN129
13. The completed map of site 38PN129
14. Human figures at site 38LU422
15. Human figures at site 38PN129
16. Male figures in enclosures at site 38PN129
17. Refrigerator
man (or woman) at site 38PN129
18. The human figure at site 38SP13
19. The single anthropomorph-like petroglyph at site 38LX273
20. Two anthropomorph-like petroglyphs at site 38OC378
21. Three anthropomorphic figures at site 38PN81
22. The fourth anthropomorph-like figure at site 38PN81
23. A possible zoomorphic motif at site 38LU422
24. A zoomorphic motif or part of an abstract design at site 38LU422
25. Turtle at site 38OC184
26. The King Beetle
zoomorph at site 38RD668
27. Serpentlike petroglyphs at site 38PN81
28. Turtle or a random combination of lines and circles at site 38PN138
29. Bold circles at site 38PN122
30. Circle with outward-radiating lines at site 38PN127
31. Abstract petroglyphs at site 38PN121
32. Abstract petroglyph at site 38PN121
33. Abstract petroglyph at site 38PN81
34. The keyhole
at site 38PN81
35. Abstract petroglyph at site 38PN81
36. The flag
at site 38PN81
37. Abstract petroglyph at site 38PN81
38. Abstract petroglyph at site 38PN81
39. The horseshoes
at site 38PN81
40. Abstract petroglyph at site 38PN81
41. The waffle
at site 38PN129
42. Abstract petroglyph at site 38PN129
43. Abstract motifs with an anthropomorph and possible zoomorphs at site 38LU422
44. Cupules in an abstract petroglyph at site 38OC378
45. Abstract petroglyph at site 38OC378
46. Buried cupule and lines discovered at site 38OC378
47. Abstract petroglyphs and cupules at site 38OC378
48. Buried abstract petroglyph discovered at site 38OC378
49. Buried abstract petroglyphs discovered at site 38OC378
50. Abstract petroglyphs and small, drilled holes at site 38GR303
51. Petroglyphs incorporated into a wall at site 38GR320
52. Cupules at site 38FA305
53. Portable petroglyph number one
54. Portable petroglyph number two
55. Portable petroglyph number three
56. Portable petroglyph number four
57. Portable petroglyph number five
58. Portable petroglyph number six
59. Portable petroglyph number seven
60. Portable petroglyph number eight
61. The two major variations of circle-and-line styles
62. Styles of circle-and-line petroglyphs
63. A circle-and-line petroglyph on permanent rock
64. Map of ridges on which permanent circle-and-line petroglyphs are most often found
65. A portable circle-and-line petroglyph
66. A portable circle-and-line petroglyph at site 38LU490
67. A portable circle-and-line petroglyph used as a gravestone at site 38GR290
68. Placing pine splinters in an iron pot in preparation for extracting sap
69. The pot turned upside down with clay sealing the gap between it and the rock
70. Liquefied pinesap flowing along the drip groove into a container
71. Leaching lye from hardwood ashes
72. A circle-and-line petroglyph on a vertical rock face at site 38SP13
73. A circle-and-line petroglyph on a near-vertical rock face at site 38GR307
74. Pairs of circle-and-line petroglyphs at sites 38LU488 and 38LU489
75. Two circle-and-line petroglyphs at site 38AN227
76. A Hockensmith’s style 4 circle-and-line petroglyph at site 38GR205
77. A circle-and-line petroglyph at site 38SP336
78. The Old Indian
or Spanish direction rock at site 38GR9
79. An eccentric circle-and-line petroglyph at site 38LU487
80. Extensive damage caused by a campfire burned on gneiss rock
81. A carved stone used to extract grape juice
82. Cup-and-ring petroglyphs in the British Isles
83. The hole-in-a-bank method of pine-tar extraction
84. A Native American carving at Track Rock Gap, Georgia
85. Motif similar to the modern peace symbol or a tar-burner petroglyph at Newspaper Rock, Utah
86. Prehistoric waterglyphs
in northern Arizona and southern Utah
87. Examples of treelike petroglyphs found on the Susquehanna River in Pennsylvania and at Tule River in California
88. Petroglyphs found in Colombia and Mexico that resemble North American circle-and-line motifs
89. The three-dimensional human face at site 38SP330
90. Skull and crossbones at site 38SP331
91. Engraved and painted snake at site 38SP331
92. Cross-and-dot petroglyph at site 38SP331
93. Bible verse carved by Clemson Turner
94. Clemson Turner’s Indian Head
carving
95. The little man at site 38GR305
96. Ten-foot man and eight-foot woman at site 38FA306
97. Cannon, date (1898), and initials at site 38SP338
98. Historic petroglyph with a later smiley face
99. Initials and date (1853) at site 38SP347
100. Date from the 1790s at site 38LU422
101. Drawing of a rock shelter and petroglyphs destroyed by rock quarrying 117
Color Plates
following p. 34
1. Volunteers searching for rock art on sunny and rainy days
2. Searching rock shelters for rock art
3. Searching for rock art near mountain crests
4. Investigating barely visible petroglyphs
5. Using talc powder to enhance the visibility of petroglyphs
6. Rock outcrops before and during the removal of humus to search for rock art; removing an old road covering part of a known rock-art site
7. Petroglyphs discovered after removing soil and forest humus from host rocks
8. Photographing petroglyphs using artificial light at night and tracing them with talc powder to make them visible during the day
following p. 98
9. Distribution of circle-and-line petroglyphs before and after completion of the South Carolina Rock Art Survey
10. Circle-and-line petroglyph locations in South Carolina; a circle-and-line petroglyph used as a foundation stone in Greenville County; an oddly formed circle-and-line petroglyph discovered in Laurens County
11. A dated stone found in the same vicinity as the Pardo stone and another found at Fort Prince George
12. The only pictograph discovered near mountain crests and the rock shelter in which it is located
13. A rock shelter in the foothills of Pickens County, host to eight catlike figure drawn with dark rust-red ocher
14. A rock shelter in Kershaw County, which has pictographs spanning much of the ceiling
15. Unenhanced and computer-enhanced photographs of a segment of the ceiling at the shelter in Kershaw County
16. The entire pictograph in the Kershaw County shelter
Tables
1. Rock-art sites recorded in South Carolina
2. Data for permanent circle-and-line petroglyphs
3. Data for portable circle-and-line petroglyphs
Unless otherwise stated in the caption, all photographs are by the author.
Preface
Unofficially and unintentionally the South Carolina Rock Art Survey began in 1983, when a collector of Indian artifacts reported a petroglyph located in the Blue Ridge Mountains of Oconee County, South Carolina. Prior to this exciting discovery, it was generally believed that prehistoric rock art did not exist in the state. During the ensuing fourteen years, five more petroglyphs were reported. Although it was meager, this evidence suggested that rock art in South Carolina might be rare simply because we had never searched for it. Toward determining if this premise might be true, I met with a group of Greenville County citizens who had funded other archaeological endeavors and proposed to them that we conduct a survey to look for additional examples of rock art. They enthusiastically agreed to support the project.
The Survey
In January of 1997, the South Carolina Institute of Archaeology and Anthropology (SCIAA) at the University of South Carolina joined with these Greenville County citizens and a host of volunteers to conduct a formal survey to seek and record the state’s rock art.
Because of the state’s natural geography, we confined our search to the Piedmont and Blue Ridge Mountain regions (see figs. 1, 4, 5, 7, and 8), the areas where most South Carolina rock formations are found. Recording all the various forms of rock alteration was not an objective. Rather we chose to concentrate on petroglyphs and pictographs considered to be products of prehistoric peoples and on historic carvings believed to be of some antiquity or particular interest. Because there were no preexisting studies of South Carolina rock art and because none of the original participants had previous experience in the field of rock-art research, our objectives were modest: to begin the survey, to acquire on-the-job experience, and to see where the research would eventually lead. Initially we inspected public lands and tracts of land owned by our supporters. Early in the survey, however, our failure to find any rock art prompted us to expand our methods to include a media appeal for information from the general public. The immediate success of this approach reinvigorated survey participants and perhaps prevented an early termination of the program. During the following nine years, as time and funding permitted, the rock-art survey continued. Volunteers came and went, each adding new enthusiasm and energy to the cause. As a group, we learned how to search for and record rock art so illusive as to be almost invisible. In the beginning we would have been elated to know that we would record a dozen petroglyphs, but we eventually discovered sixty-one petroglyph sites (some containing many glyphs) and three pictograph sites. Eight other petroglyph sites that had been destroyed by various means were also documented. Many portable petroglyphs were also documented, but only four were given site designations because all the others had been removed from their original locations.
While this book is not an all-inclusive catalog, the rock art presented in it is representative of the wide variey of motifs we discovered and the landforms on which we found them. To protect the petroglyphs and to honor the wishes of landowners, descriptions of rock-art locations are limited to the counties in which they were discovered.
Methodology
When we began the South Carolina Rock Art Survey, we had little concept of what we would encounter. A search for rock-art information produced an abundance of data about rock art of the American West but relatively little relating to that of the midwestern and northeastern states. There was an even greater paucity of data pertaining to rock art in the southeastern states. Our research reinforced what we already suspected: that the western states hosted a far greater number of known rock-art sites than those states east of the Mississippi River and that rock art of the West is generally in a much better state of preservation. It was also clear, however, that many examples of well-preserved rock art do exist in the East, and we hoped that highly visible rock art might also be found in South Carolina. Ultimately we discovered such glyphs, but with the exception of some historic examples, most were located near mountaintops. Thus, because we began the survey on much lower elevations where