Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

Antony and Cleopatra
Antony and Cleopatra
Antony and Cleopatra
Ebook165 pages1 hour

Antony and Cleopatra

Rating: 3 out of 5 stars

3/5

()

Read preview

About this ebook

In this extraordinary play, one of Shakespeare's finest tragedies, a once-great general finds himself torn between his duty to the Roman Empire and his passionate attachment to Cleopatra, the alluring "Queen of the Nile." In depicting the collision of two contrasting cultures — Antony's world of political conniving and the hedonistic pleasures of Cleopatra's court — the playwright portrays a timeless paradox of human nature, the quest for seemingly irreconcilable goals.
The action of the play ranges from Alexandria and Rome to Syria and Athens, from the rugged quarters of military camps to the luxurious atmosphere of the Egyptian court. In the latter milieu Antony lingers, shamed by his overwhelming passion for Cleopatra yet irresistibly drawn toward love as a source of vitality and renewal. After ignoring increasingly urgent demands by his co-ruler, Octavius Caesar, for his return to Rome, Antony reluctantly obeys at last, marrying Octavius's sister and forming a fragile political alliance. This bond shatters when he returns to Cleopatra's side. Octavius declares war on the lovers, forcing them into a battle for world domination with dramatic and unforgettable consequences.
Brimming with Shakespeare's matchless poetry, Antony and Cleopatra is one of the world's great plays. In this inexpensive edition, it will enthrall students of drama and literature, poetry lovers, and all who appreciate Shakespeare's art.
LanguageEnglish
Release dateJul 28, 2014
ISBN9780486159706
Author

William Shakespeare

William Shakespeare is widely regarded as the greatest playwright the world has seen. He produced an astonishing amount of work; 37 plays, 154 sonnets, and 5 poems. He died on 23rd April 1616, aged 52, and was buried in the Holy Trinity Church, Stratford.

Read more from William Shakespeare

Related to Antony and Cleopatra

Related ebooks

Performing Arts For You

View More

Related articles

Reviews for Antony and Cleopatra

Rating: 3.090909090909091 out of 5 stars
3/5

11 ratings21 reviews

What did you think?

Tap to rate

Review must be at least 10 words

  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    I found this so-so. Both Antony and Cleopatra are portrayed as fickle individuals absorbed in their love-making to the exclusion of everything else. Cleopatra in particular is whiny and manipulative; Antony plainly gives up on all duties. The play only becomes tragic and imbued with grandeur once I allow myself to not think of these people as, well, humans but as larger-than-life figures, household names straight out of Great (Wo)Man History. I’m not sure I want to do that. The quality picks up towards the end, but the earlier acts contain some good back-and-forth banter and penis jokes.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    We had a free-choice play for my Shakespeare class, so I thought this would be a good one because Cleopatra is a great character. I also attempted to make a beaded headpiece to wear during my presentation, which didn't entirely work. The play is long and goes all over the place, but it's one of the greatest romances of all time, and worth reading.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    This is truly a play of epic proportions, moving from the centre of Rome to her periphery, including places such as Egypt and the borders of Parthia. It is one of Shakespeare's later works, and the skill in which he brings so much together onto the stage simply goes to show how skillful he was at producing historical drama. Now, some scholars like to argue that Shakespeare could not have been responsible for so many plays of such high quality, however I personally find such research and argument to be quite useless. In the end, I tend to, and have always tended to, lean towards the mythological than the scientific, and while it may be the case that Shakespeare was not responsible for the plays, I personally see no benefit in such argument and speculation.One of the things that I struggle with these plays is that they can be difficult to follow at times with the poetical language of the 17th Century and the difficulties in determining which character is who (which in some cases involves flipping back to the dramatis personae). I have also been watching the series Rome, and the characters of Mark Antony and Cleopatra seem to invade my mind from that show making it a little difficult differentiating Shakespeare's characters. The Mark Antony of the TV series is a much more brutal and despotic character than is Shakespeare's. However, we must remember two things, and they are that Shakespeare is not attempting to give us an insight into the culture and lifestyles of Ancient Romans, while Bruno Heller is not trying to produce, or even rewrite Shakespeare. In fact it is very clear that Heller, in his TV series, is giving Shakespeare a very wide berth.I find the topics of Shakespeare's plays quite interesting though because I have noted that Shakespeare seems to steer clear of writing any plays based upon biblical stories, even tragedies (and there are many stories in the bible that a skillful playwright could transform into a tragedy of Shakespearian proportions), but rather he seems to lean much closer to the secular world of Ancient Rome. Further, he does not seem to go to rewrite the ancient tragedies, even those of Seneca (Shakespeare did not know Greek therefore he only had access to Greek texts that had been translated, such as Plutarch's Lives). Even then, Shakespeare only borrowed three stories from Plutarch's Lives, that being Coriolanus, Julius Ceaser, and Mark Antony (even though Julius Ceaser is the tragedy of Brutus).I am almost inclined to suggest that if it was not for this play or for Julius Ceaser, that the characters of Ceaser, Brutus, Antony, and Cleopatra, would probably not be as dominant in our culture as they are. In a way, Shakespeare took one of the defining periods of Roman History, namely the period in which the republic collapsed and was replaced by the empire, and placed them onto the stage. Whether this play is supposed to be a 'sequal' to Julius Ceaser is difficult to determine, though it is interesting to note that Bernard Shaw later wrote a third play, Ceaser and Cleopatra, to turn this into a trilogy.The background of these events is when Ceaser Augustus defeated his enemies and ascended to the throne as the first emperor of Rome. However, it is also interesting that after this we have another great shift in European history: we shift from the west, back to the east, to the birth, life, and death, of the messiah - Jesus Christ. However, this is not mentioned in the play, though there are some hints to the appearance of Herod the Great.It is difficult to tell whether there is truly a fatal flaw in Mark Antony, and it is also difficult to determine whether Cleopatra actually loved him. Her trick at the end of the play, where she feigns death, and as a result Antony kills himself, is not the action of somebody in love, even chivalrous love. In a way she has been testing Antony's love throughout the play, but whether she loved him, or simply lusted after him, is difficult to tell. Many of us like to see this as a love story, but to me, it is not. It is a story about a man who let himself become possessed by a wiry woman which in turn brought about his downfall. Remember two things about Egypt of this period: it was not a part of Rome, rather it was a protectorate, and secondly Cleopatra considered herself a god. While she was subservient to Rome, she still did not recognise Rome as her ruler. As such, by sinking her claws into Antony proved a way of enabling her to shift the balance of power back to her.It is interesting that Shakespeare uses the serpent as the means of her death. It is almost as if the serpent is submitting herself to a serpent. She wrapped her coils around Antony and enchanted him, and in doing so set his downfall in motion (remembering that this is not the Mark Antony that is portrayed elsewhere). Ceaser tries everything to break her spell, including marrying him to his sister, but he fails. In the middle of an important battle with the pirates that are preventing wheat shipments from reaching Rome, Antony deserts and travels to Egypt. In Egypt he finds that his soldiers are deserting him, and even though he wins the first battle, he makes a tactical error, by fighting at sea instead of land, and as a result he is defeated.However, it is interesting that Ceaser does not condemn or punish him for his crimes. It appears that Ceaser understands that it was Cleopatra's whiles that dragged him to this point and has his body carried off in honour and leaves his legacy intact. However Cleopatra, recognising that her life of luxury and as a queen of Egypt is over instead of going into slavery she poisons herself. We hear her speak of being a slave and of watching plays where she is turned into a whore and mocked on stage. It is not her position that leads her to her death, but her legacy. However, this is not the legacy that has come down to us because we, today, know of Cleopatra as the beautiful queen of Egypt.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Huh. I'd have put money on my having read this before, though quite a while back, but I sure don't remember finding Cleopatra so loathsome before. I've read enough histories that cover the whole Julius Caesar/Mark Antony/Cleopatra/Octavius/death by asps thing that maybe I hadn't read Shakespeare's version before. At any rate, history suggests that Cleopatra was canny, intelligent, and deliberate, but Shakespeare's Cleopatra is a silly, fickle, whining brat. Character after character tells us that she is bewitching, glorious, and desirable, but every time we meet her she is whimpering and simpering, telling silly lies to manipulate Antony, swanning around in a way that would embarrass a sensible teenager, much less a matronly queen. And Antony isn't much better. Far from taking his position in the triumvirate seriously, he tosses his responsibilities to Rome and his family there aside to frisk, puppy-like, around his Egyptian mistress. Yuck. Neither one comes off as grown-up, much less as noble figures whose tragic fates we should find regrettable. And yet...Despite the characters' manifold flaws, the play is deeply compelling. Somehow both Antony and Cleopatra, for all their foolish choices and pettinesses, transcend all and appear, in the end, to be outsize, even archetypal figures. Their bad decisions, which so many other people must pay for, somehow end with a sort of grandeur and mythic feel that, logically, the details don't support. They are so convinced of the earth shattering significance of their lives that they convince us it is so. Having turned these historical figures into melodramatic children Shakespeare uses his art to transform them further into great tragic lovers.Part of my extreme distaste for Cleopatra may be thanks to the very excellent Arkangel recording of the play that I listened to along with my reading of the Arden Shakespeare edition. Estelle Kohler, who plays Cleopatra, doesn't hold back anything in her emotional performance. All the weeping, whining, wheedling, and cattiness is going full throttle. The asp could have showed up in, say, Act 2, and Antony could have settled down with Octavia, who seemed a nice, sensible sort of woman, and things would have been much simpler. But that wouldn't have made much of a story, would it? Marjorie Garber's wonderful essay, in her “Shakespeare After All,” helped me appreciate the play, though she couldn't make the main characters any less annoying. Highly recommended.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    I didn't like Antony and Cleopatra very much at the beginning -- but then, it always seems to take about an act for me to get into the swing of a Shakespeare play. It helps with Julius Caesar and Antony and Cleopatra that I'm familiar with the history it's based on. It took me a while to warm to the characters of Antony and Cleopatra, though, but for all that there's something very human about the way Cleopatra reacts to Antony -- now this, now that -- and how he responds to her.

    There are, of course, some beautiful speeches and descriptions here: I was nudged into reading this by reading a reference just yesterday to Cleopatra burning upon the water. I don't think I've seen this one as often quoted as I have the other Shakespeare plays I've been reading lately, though...
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Despite its length and myriads of scene changes and characters to keep track of, I really enjoyed this play. I feel like it's not performed often enough on the Shakepeare circuits, but that helps to keep it fresh for me when I read it. The Folger edition contains footnotes to explain some of the archaic language and references, which is extremely helpful when reading.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    The classical tragic romance.
    I found Cleopatra a little annoying but overall enjoyed this doomed tale.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    Although a classic story, the characters came across to me as very mono-dimensional. I didn't really care about any of them. Antony just seemed whipped and Cleo didn't seem to have anything to inspire his devotion. Too melodramatic without much substance.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    First reading of this play. For me it is definitely a play of two halves. The first three acts felt rather tedious and the dialogue unmemorable. But the fourth act, divided into no less than 13 scenes, mostly very short, contained the famous meat of the drama. Act 5 scene 2 also served as a dramatic conclusion.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    I know it's anathema for an English major, but this play was ho hum to me. Probably the et tu Brute....
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    Why do men do what they do when they're totally in love with women? Read this to find out...or at least dwell on it. Maybe we'll never come to a conclusion.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    Read on my Kindle as part of Shakespeare's "The Complete Works".While the plot of this tragedy had plenty of action, somehow it just didn't work for me. I don't know if it was the language, my mood, or reading it instead of watching a performance... I'll have to try this one again sometime
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    I do like the bit where Antony gives a grandiose speech, stabs himself, and then is mortified with annoyed surprise at the fact that he's still alive afterward.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    Not my favorite of the bard's work but he really can't write poorly. I am not as fascinated by this 'epic' love story as some may be.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Shakespeare here writes about two historical characters far more famous and important that Lear or Macbeth but he doesn't treat them in a monumental tragic fashion. He instead portrays them as rather ordinary mortals: Antony, a pliable politician and unfocused warrior; Cleopatra, a passionate but insecure cougar. The most interesting scene is a on-boat banquet where the shrewd politicos of Rome persuade a young revolutionary to abandon a rebellion he is winning. The most memorable character (to me) is Enobarbus, a close, intelligent friend of Antony who betrays him when he decides he has no chance to win and then cannot live with himself.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    *If you actually don't know the story of this play, just a warning, this review will probably contain some spoilers.This Shakespeare play tells the famous love story of Marcus Antonius and Cleopatra VII. Their countries, the crumbling kingdom of Egypt and the rising, powerful kingdom of Rome, are at war, and relations are hostile between them. Despite all this, Antony and Cleopatra, who should have been enemies, are in love. Caesar is beginning to take desperate measures in order to lure Antony back to his homeland, where they need him as a general.This play contained a lot of interesting motives, with the love story between enemies as the most noticeable, of course. Caesar's many efforts to direct Antony's love back to Rome were also interesting - after the man had slighted him, insulted him, and defied him so many times, Caesar remains hopeful, and continues his attempts to reclaim his best general. Besides being in need of a strong commander for his war, Caesar obviously also loves Antony. He has him marry into his family, making Antony officially family, but he clearly thought of the young man as family far before the marriage.Cleopatra was also interesting, and one of those characters who you can't quite predict (besides knowing the story beforehand, that is). She is at times hard and cool, at other times warm. Cruel and kind, angry and happy. With Antony, her mind and moods change like the wind. I wondered, exasperated at times, how he could possibly put up with her. However, Antony seems to view this as evidence of how passionate Cleopatra is, how unique, and how mysterious she is. Antony is fascinated with her, and would have been no matter what.Like many hopeless romances that cannot possibly end well, this one doesn't. The scene where Antony flees from battle to follow Cleopatra was a sad one. On one hand, his ultimate, absolute devotion to her was touching. Being a soldier and a warrior was what he had been trained to do for all his life. Undoubtedly, he dreamed of one day being a general. He knows nothing else, and he has worked for nothing else. He will have had men in his charge on other ships, probably friends, perhaps men he grew up with. Yet he leaves them, to follow Cleopatra's ship. It was a terrible choice that had tragic consequences, one that was neither right nor wrong. Though he does not regret his love for Cleopatra, Antony acknowledges after his desertion from battle that he betrayed his men and himself. Cleopatra understands his shame.A tragic romance from Shakespeare.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    "Antony & Cleopatra" is definitely not one of my favorite Shakespeare plays. It is a slow starter that sort of meanders about setting the scene for several acts before getting to the meat of the story. The ending, however, is terrific.... it just takes a long while to get there.In the play, Cleopatra has fallen in love with Antony, one of the triumverate of Roman rulers. Of course, the rulers can't see to get along and end up in conflict with each other. War, destruction and death ensue.It's an interesting story but not one of Shakespeare's most entertaining, unfortunately.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    Cleopatra: the fiercest, most fabulous queen in Shakespeare.
    Marc Antony: can't even commit suicide right.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    Had to read the play, cause I love the history. Im not a big fan of Shakespeare, but the loved the play because of the charectors.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    I've never read the play before, and it was really interesting.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    I didn't like it as much as Shakespeare's other plays, probably because, for some reason, I had a harder time understanding it and it took me most of the first half of the play to really get into it. The very last scene is definitely my favorite, and I wish the rest of the play was that good.Cleopatra is probably one of my favorite female Shakespeare characters, though, along with her maids.

Book preview

Antony and Cleopatra - William Shakespeare

DOVER · THRIFT · EDITIONS

Antony and Cleopatra

WILLIAM SHAKESPEARE

DOVER PUBLICATIONS, INC.

Mineola, New York

DOVER THRIFT EDITIONS

GENERAL EDITOR: PAUL NEGRI

EDITOR OF THIS VOLUME: ADAM FROST

Copyright

Copyright © 1998 by Dover Publications, Inc.

All rights reserved.

Theatrical Rights

This Dover Thrift Edition may be used in its entirety, in adaptation or in any other way for theatrical productions, professional and amateur, in the United States, without fee, permission, or acknowledgement. (This may not apply outside the United States, as copyright conditions may vary.)

Bibliographical Note

This Dover edition, first published in 1998 and reissued in 2014, contains the unabridged text of Antony and Cleopatra as published in Volume XVIII of The Caxton Edition of the Complete Works of William Shakespeare, Caxton Publishing Company, London, n.d. The Note was prepared specially for the Dover edition, and explanatory footnotes from the Caxton edition have been supplemented and revised.

Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data

Shakespeare, William, 1564–1616.

Antony and Cleopatra / William Shakespeare.

p. cm.

eISBN-13: 978-0-486-15970-6

1. Antonius, Marcus, 83 B.C?–30 B.C.—Drama. 2. Cleopatra, Queen of Egypt, 69–30 B.C.—Drama. 3. Rome—History—Civil War, 43–31 B.C.—Drama. 4. Egypt—History—332–30 B.C.—Drama. I. Title.

PR2802.A1 2014

822.3'3—dc23

2014009820

Manufactured in the United States by Courier Corporation

40062X01     2014

www.doverpublications.com

Note

As WITH MANY of the plays of William Shakespeare (1564–1616), the dating of Antony and Cleopatra can at best be guessed. The Stationers’ Register for May 20, 1608, contains an entry for A booke Called Anthony, and Cleopatra and for another called Pericles prynce of Tyre, also one of Shakespeare’s subjects: neither was immediately published, and it is likely that their entry was an effort to block the publication of pirated versions of the two plays. In 1607 Samuel Daniel published a revised edition of his Tragedie of Cleopatra (1593), his alterations showing a familiarity with Shakespeare’s tragedy. It may safely be assumed, therefore, that Antony and Cleopatra was composed and staged in late 1606 or early 1607, following soon after King Lear and Macbeth.

Shakespeare already had treated the political life of Ancient Rome — in Julius Cæsar (1599)—but his decision to continue the story of Mark Antony may in fact be due to that character’s proven popularity with Tudor and Elizabethan audiences. If Daniel had revised his Cleopatra to capitalize on the other’s success, Shakespeare himself knew and was indebted to his predecessor’s version. It is likely that he had also read Antonius, the Countess of Pembroke’s translation of Garnier’s Marc Antoine, and that he remembered the portrait of Antony in Spenser’s Faerie Queen, previously a source for King Lear. And there is no doubt that Shakespeare knew almost by heart Thomas North’s Lives of the noble Grecians and Romanes (1579), the translation of a French edition of Plutarch’s Parallel Lives from which he also took elements of Julius Cæsar, A Midsummer Night’s Dream, and Coriolanus.

Antony and Cleopatra remains largely faithful to North’s version of Plutarch, in both story and language. Shakespeare is vague about the amount of time encompassed by the play (about ten years: the lapse between Antony’s death and that of Cleopatra was of months, not hours as Shakespeare maintains), and he glosses over such details as Antony’s three children by Octavia, but the play’s action on the whole transpires in the order given by Plutarch. Indeed, many of the most memorable incidents and descriptions in Shakespeare’s play have their foundation in the other writer’s work, from the fabulous tales of Cleopatra’s tricks and Antony’s debauches, to the very wording of certain passages: compare, for example, Enobarbus’s report of Antony and Cleopatra’s first meeting (II, ii) with the following lines form North:

She disdained to set forward otherwise, but to take her barge in the river of Cydnus, the poope whereof was of gold, the sailes of purple, and the owers of silver, which kept stroke in rowing after the sounde of the musicke of flutes, howboyes, citherns, violls, and such other instruments as they played upon in the barge. And now for the person of her self: she was layed under a pavillion of cloth of gold of tissue, apparelled and attired like the goddesse Venus, commonly drawen in picture: and hard by her, on either hand of her, pretie faire boyes apparelled as painters doe set forth god Cupide, with litle fannes in their hands, with the which they fanned wind upon her . . .

Nowhere else is the playwright’s source so discernible through his words.

Shakespeare’s indebtedness to North’s Plutarch, however, is limited to the language and plot of the play, for his interpretation of the lovers’ story is decidedly different. The older writer, a Greek who lived for some time in Rome, admires Antony but treats him as Cleopatra’s victim, an instance of Roman virtue brought down by Eastern sensuality: the horse of the minde . . . that is so hard of rayne (I meane the un-reyned lust of concupiscence) did put out of Antonius heade, all honest and commendable thoughtes. Shakespeare, however, counterbalances the Roman view with that of Egypt. To him, the couple resemble nothing so much as a more experienced, middle-aged Romeo and Juliet, ennobled rather than diminished by the love that proves their undoing. Certainly Cleopatra is a vain and selfish woman who toys with Antony—at the cost of his life—to the last, but there is little doubt that her emotion is real, her passion felt. And Antony, once thought to have been transform’d Into a strumpet’s fool, his duties as a ruler neglected in the pursuit of pleasure, restores his nobility by choosing to die for love. As Cæsar himself forecasts in the play’s closing lines, though Rome is triumphant, its victory will be equaled if not eclipsed in fame by the tragedy of Egypt.

Contents

Dramatis Personæ

Act I

Act II

Act III

Act IV

Act V

Dramatis Personæ

ACT I.

SCENE   I. Alexandria. A Room in Cleopatra’s Palace.

Enter DEMETRIUS and PHILO

PHILO.   Nay, but this dotage of our general’s

O’erflows the measure: those his goodly eyes,

That o’er the files and musters of the war

Have glow’d like plated¹ Mars, now bend, now turn,

The office and devotion of their view

Upon a tawny front: his captain’s heart,

Which in the scuffles of great fights hath burst

The buckles on his breast, reneges all temper,²

And is become the bellows and the fan

To cool a gipsy’s lust.

Flourish. Enter ANTONY, CLEOPATRA, her Ladies, the Train, with Eunuchs fanning her

Look, where they come:

Take but good note, and you shall see in him

The triple pillar³ of the world transform’d

Into a strumpet’s fool: behold and see.

CLEO.   If it be love indeed, tell me how much.

ANT.   There’s beggary in the love that can be reckon’d.

CLEO.   I’ll set a bourn⁴ how far to be beloved.

ANT.   Then must thou needs find out new heaven, new earth.

Enter an Attendant

ATT.   News, my good lord, from Rome.

ANT.Grates me: the sum⁵.

CLEO.   Nay, hear them,⁶ Antony:

Fulvia perchance is angry; or, who knows

If the scarce-bearded Cæsar have not sent

His powerful mandate to you, "Do this, or this;

Take in that kingdom, and enfranchise that;

Perform ’t, or else we damn thee."

ANT.How, my love!

CLEO.   Perchance! nay, and most like:

You must not stay here longer, your dismission

Is come from Cæsar; therefore hear it, Antony.

Where’s Fulvia’s process?⁷ Cæsar’s I would say? both?

Call in the messengers. As I am Egypt’s queen,

Thou blushest, Antony, and that blood of thine

Is Cæsar’s homager:⁸ else so thy cheek pays shame

When shrill-tongued Fulvia scolds. The messengers!

ANT.   Let Rome in Tiber melt, and the wide arch

Of the ranged⁹ empire fall! Here is my space.

Kingdoms are clay: our dungy earth alike

Feeds beast as man: the nobleness of life

Is to do thus; when such a mutual pair[Embracing.

And such a twain can do’t, in which I bind,

On pain of punishment, the world to weet¹⁰

We stand up peerless.

CLEO.Excellent falsehood!

Why did he marry Fulvia, and not love her?

I’ll seem the fool I am not; Antony

Will be himself.¹¹

ANT.But stirr’d by Cleopatra.

Now, for the love of Love and her soft hours,

Let’s not confound the time with conference harsh:

There’s not a minute of our lives should stretch

Without some pleasure now. What sport to-night?

CLEO.   Hear the ambassadors.

ANT.Fie, wrangling queen!

Whom every thing becomes, to chide, to laugh,

To weep; whose every passion fully strives

To make itself, in thee, fair and admired!

No messenger but thine; and all alone

To-night we’ll wander through the streets and note

The qualities of people. Come, my queen;

Last night you did desire it. Speak not to us.

[Exeunt Ant. and Cleo. with their train.

DEM. Is   Cæsar with Antonius prized so slight?

Enjoying the preview?
Page 1 of 1