Everand Logo

Welcome to Everand!

  • Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

    Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

    Punitive Damages: How Juries Decide
    Punitive Damages: How Juries Decide
    Punitive Damages: How Juries Decide
    Ebook272 pages6 hours

    Punitive Damages: How Juries Decide

    By Cass R. Sunstein, Reid Hastie, John W. Payne and

    ()

    Read preview

    About this ebook

    Over the past two decades, the United States has seen a dramatic increase in the number and magnitude of punitive damages verdicts rendered by juries in civil trials. Probably the most extraordinary example is the July 2000 award of $144.8 billion in the Florida class action lawsuit brought against cigarette manufacturers. Or consider two recent verdicts against the auto manufacturer BMW in Alabama. In identical cases, argued in the same court before the same judge, one jury awarded $4 million in punitive damages, while the other awarded no punitive damages at all. In cases involving accidents, civil rights, and the environment, multimillion-dollar punitive awards have been a subject of intense controversy.

    But how do juries actually make decisions about punitive damages? To find out, the authors-experts in psychology, economics, and the law-present the results of controlled experiments with more than 600 mock juries involving the responses of more than 8,000 jury-eligible citizens. Although juries tended to agree in their moral judgments about the defendant's conduct, they rendered erratic and unpredictable dollar awards. The experiments also showed that instead of moderating juror verdicts, the process of jury deliberation produced a striking "severity shift" toward ever-higher awards. Jurors also tended to ignore instructions from the judges; were influenced by whatever amount the plaintiff happened to request; showed "hindsight bias," believing that what happened should have been foreseen; and penalized corporations that had based their decisions on careful cost-benefit analyses. While judges made many of the same errors, they performed better in some areas, suggesting that judges (or other specialists) may be better equipped than juries to decide punitive damages.

    Using a wealth of new experimental data, and offering a host of provocative findings, this book documents a wide range of systematic biases in jury behavior. It will be indispensable for anyone interested not only in punitive damages, but also jury behavior, psychology, and how people think about punishment.
    LanguageEnglish
    PublisherUniversity of Chicago Press
    Release dateDec 19, 2008
    ISBN9780226780160
    Punitive Damages: How Juries Decide
    Author

    Cass R. Sunstein

    Cass R. Sunstein is the Robert Walmsley University Professor at Harvard, where he is founder and director of the Program on Behavioral Economics and Public Policy. He is the most cited law professor in the United States and probably the world. He has served as Administrator of the White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs and as a member of the President’s Review Group on Intelligence and Communications Technologies. He is the winner of the 2018 Holberg Prize. His many books include the bestseller Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness (with Richard H. Thaler), Simpler: The Future of Government, and Republic.com. A frequent adviser to governments all over the world and a columnist for Bloomberg View, he is married to the United States Ambassador to the United Nations, Samantha Power.

    Read more from Cass R. Sunstein

    Related to Punitive Damages

    Related ebooks

    Law For You

    View More
    View More

    Related podcast episodes

    Related articles

    • Article

      Supreme Court Lets Stand Ruling That Protects Homeless Who Sleep On Sidewalk

      Dec 16, 2019

      WASHINGTON - The Supreme Court refused Monday to hear a major case on homeless, letting stand a ruling that protects their right to sleep on the sidewalk or in public parks if no other shelter is available. The justices without comment or a dissent s

      3 min read

    • Article

      The Parties Understand and Agree That by Entering Into This Agreement They Are Each Relinquishing and Waiving Their Right Under Applicable Law to Have Any Claim Decided in a Court of Law Before a Judge and/or Jury.

      Nov 27, 2017

      I. SISTER IRENE MORISSETTE ALWAYS LOCKED HER DOOR AT night. Maybe it was force of habit from her decades teaching at an isolated missionary school in Africa, or maybe it was, as she told a police detective later, just that she didn’t want “anyone co

      11 min read

    • Article

      Attorneys Accused Of Acting Like ‘Loan Sharks’

      Nov 22, 2020

      TWO seasoned legal practitioners are required to show why they should not be struck off the roll of practising attorneys, considering the allegations of unprofessional and ethical conduct against them. Operating like “loan sharks”, charging exorbitan

      2 min read

    • Article

      Court Convenes: Healing and Justice Meet

      Sep 14, 2017

      "Even if you're the one charged, you will help create the answer." And the court has now come to order. The speaker is Colleen Sheehan, the presiding judge of the Restorative Justice Community Court, which opened last week in the Chicago neighborhood

      3 min read

    • Article

      Assuring The High Court’s Integrity

      May 4, 2022

      Outside the U.S. Supreme Court this week, passions ran high over the leak of a draft opinion that – if final – would overturn Roe v. Wade. Nationwide, those on either side of the landmark 1973 ruling quickly jumped into the bear pit of political comb

      2 min read

    • Article

      Let’s Be Rational

      Oct 3, 2021

      Let’s Be Rational
      8 min read

    • Article

      Our Moral Agenda

      Mar 14, 2021

      Our Moral Agenda
      4 min read

    • Article

      In Memoriam: Richard L. Stroup (1943–2021)

      Jul 18, 2022

      Rick Stroup was one of the founders of the environmental economics movement; he was a conservationist of the first rank. Conserving resources requires accounting for the opportunity costs of using those resources. But in the 1970s the focus of enviro

      5 min read

    • Article

      Experts Take On Carbon Polluters In The Courtroom

      Apr 11, 2022

      A new guide by UCS and the Climate Science Legal Defense Fund will help scientists navigate the legal system.

      3 min read

    • Article

      The Legal Principle Behind A More Restrained Supreme Court Term

      Jul 7, 2023

      It is the first question that must be answered in every U.S. Supreme Court case: Does the court have jurisdiction to hear the case at all? The question of standing, as it is called, loomed large over the just-concluded term in cases covering everythi

      6 min read

    Related categories

    Reviews for Punitive Damages

    0 ratings

    0 ratings0 reviews

    What did you think?

    Tap to rate

    Review must be at least 10 words

      Book preview

      Punitive Damages - Cass R. Sunstein

      Enjoying the preview?
      Page 1 of 1