Vernacular Architecture
4.5/5
()
About this ebook
Based on thirty-five years of fieldwork, Glassie's Vernacular Architecture synthesizes a career of concern with traditional building. He articulates the key principles of architectural analysis, and then, centering his argument in the United States, but drawing comparative examples from many locations in Europe and Asia, he shows how architecture can be a prime resource for the one who would write a democratic and comprehensive history.
Henry Glassie
Henry Glassie, College Professor Emeritus at Indiana University, has written many books, three of which — Passing the Time in Ballymenone,The Spirit of Folk Art, and Turkish Traditional Art Today — were named notable books of the year by the New York Times. He has won many awards for his work, including the award for a lifetime of scholarly achievement from the American Folklore Society and the Haskins Prize of the American Council of Learned Societies for a distinctive career of humanistic scholarship.
Read more from Henry Glassie
A Measure of the Earth: The Cole-Ware Collection of American Baskets Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Sacred Art: Catholic Saints and Candomblé Gods in Modern Brazil Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDaniel Johnston: A Portrait of the Artist as a Potter in North Carolina Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsIrish Folk History: Tales from the North Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Stars of Ballymenone, New Edition Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Historic Preservation in Indiana: Essays from the Field Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFolk Art: Continuity, Creativity, and the Brazilian Quotidian Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related to Vernacular Architecture
Related ebooks
Writing Architecture: A Practical Guide to Clear Communication about the Built Environment Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5How to Read a Building Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Secrets of Architectural Composition Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Architecture of Humanism - A Study in the History of Taste Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Narrative Architecture Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Stillness and Light: The Silent Eloquence of Shaker Architecture Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Language of Houses: How Buildings Speak to Us Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Topographical Stories: Studies in Landscape and Architecture Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThink Like an Architect Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Welcome to Your World: How the Built Environment Shapes Our Lives Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Architecture, Mysticism, and Myth Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Architecture of Failure Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOrnament: The Politics of Architecture and Subjectivity Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsArt of Japanese Architecture: History / Culture / Design Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsForm and Design in Classic Architecture Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Architectural Condition Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Origins And Myths Of Modern Architecture Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5How Architecture Works: A Humanist's Toolkit Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Integration of Contemporary Architecture in Heritage Sites Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Perfect House: A Journey with Renaissance Master Andrea Palladio Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Ten Books on Architecture Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Four Walls and a Roof: The Complex Nature of a Simple Profession Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Louis Kahn: A Life in Architecture Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDiller Scofidio + Renfro: Architecture after Images Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Kissing Architecture Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Sensing Architecture: Essays on the Nature of Architectural Experience Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsObsolescence: An Architectural History Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsArchitecture for the Poor: An Experiment in Rural Egypt Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Mickey Muenning: Dreams and Realizations for A Living Architecture Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Architecture For You
Martha Stewart's Organizing: The Manual for Bringing Order to Your Life, Home & Routines Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Home Sweet Maison: The French Art of Making a Home Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Become An Exceptional Designer: Effective Colour Selection For You And Your Client Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Architecture 101: From Frank Gehry to Ziggurats, an Essential Guide to Building Styles and Materials Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Little Book of Living Small Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Year-Round Solar Greenhouse: How to Design and Build a Net-Zero Energy Greenhouse Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Frommer's Athens and the Greek Islands Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsArchitecture and How to Sketch it - Illustrated by Sketches of Typical Examples Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5House Beautiful: Colors for Your Home: The Ultimate Guide to Choosing Paint Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHow to Fix Absolutely Anything: A Homeowner's Guide Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5My Creative Space: How to Design Your Home to Stimulate Ideas and Spark Innovation Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Timber Framing for the Rest of Us: A Guide to Contemporary Post and Beam Construction Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Welcome Home: A Cozy Minimalist Guide to Decorating and Hosting All Year Round Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFlatland Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Shinto the Kami Way Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Rustic Modern Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Nesting Place: It Doesn't Have to Be Perfect to Be Beautiful Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Get Your House Right: Architectural Elements to Use & Avoid Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Solar Power Demystified: The Beginners Guide To Solar Power, Energy Independence And Lower Bills Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Giza Power Plant: Technologies of Ancient Egypt Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Down to Earth: Laid-back Interiors for Modern Living Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Live Beautiful Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Feng Shui Modern Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5How to Build Shipping Container Homes With Plans Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Cozy Minimalist Home: More Style, Less Stuff Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Lies Across America: What Our Historic Sites Get Wrong Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5How Paris Became Paris: The Invention of the Modern City Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The New Bohemians Handbook: Come Home to Good Vibes Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for Vernacular Architecture
8 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
Vernacular Architecture - Henry Glassie
VERNACULAR ARCHITECTURE
VERNACULAR ARCHITECTURE
Henry Glassie
Photographs, Drawings, and Design by the Author
material culture
This is the second in a series of books on material culture, co-published by Material Culture of Philadelphia and the Indiana University Press, edited by George Jevremović, William T. Sumner, and Henry Glassie.
Vernacular Architecture is an expanded revision of the fifth chapter of Henry Glassie’s Material Culture, published by the Indiana University Press in 1999.
Photographs: cover, Dalarna, Sweden; p. 1, Anadarko, Oklahoma; p. 2, Kütahya, Turkey; p. 3, Somerset, England; p. 7, Lima Parish, Dalarna, Sweden; p. 200, Greene County, Tennessee
No part of this book may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying or recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. The Association of American University Presses’ Resolution on Permissions constitutes the only exception to this prohibition.
The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of American National Standard for Information Sciences — Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, ANSI Z39.48-1984.
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Glassie, Henry H.
Vernacular architecture / Henry Glassie; photographs, drawings, and design by the author.
p. cm.—(Material culture)
Expanded revision of the fifth chapter of Henry Glassie’s Material culture, published by the Indiana University Press in 1999
—T.p. verso.
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN 978-0-253-33756-6 (cl. : alk. paper)—ISBN 978-0-253-21395-2 (pbk. : alk. paper)
1. Vernacular architecture.
2. Vernacular architecture—United States.
I. Title. II. Material culture (Indiana University, Bloomington)
NA208.G59 2000
720—dc21 00-040679
5 6 7 8 16 15 14
CONTENTS
Vernacular Architecture
Materialization
Architectural Technology
Social Orders
Composition
Architectural Decoration
Complexity in Architectural Time
Compositional Levels
Forms and Causes
History
The American Landscape
An Entry to History
Comparison in Ireland
The U. S. in the Nineteenth Century
Pattern in Time
Acknowledgments
Notes
Bibliography
Index
for
James Marston Fitch
VERNACULAR ARCHITECTURE
Glassie. Perthshire, Scotland. 1972
Ahmetler. Çanakkale, Turkey. 1986
Shankharibazar. Dhaka, Bangladesh. 1998
Church. Ferdinand, Indiana. 1969
Mosque. Güre, Edremit, Turkey. 1997
Shinto shrine. Uji, Japan. 1998
Home. Kütahya, Turkey. 1999
Home. Bloomington, Indiana. 1994
Home. County Derry, Northern Ireland. 1972
Home. York County, Pennsylvania. 1968
Home. Hagi, Japan. 1999
Home. Vale, Guernsey, Channel Islands. 1982
Home. Valaiyapatti, Tamil Nadu, India. 1999
Home. Bolat, Konya, Turkey. 1994
VERNACULAR ARCHITECTURE
BUILDINGS, LIKE POEMS and rituals, realize culture. Their designers rationalize their actions differently. Some say they design and build as they do because it is the ancient way of their people and place. Others claim that their practice correctly manifests the universally valid laws of science. But all of them create out of the smallness of their own experience.
All architects are born into architectural environments that condition their notions of beauty and bodily comfort and social propriety. Before they have been burdened with knowledge about architecture, their eyes have seen, their fingers have touched, their minds have inquired into the wholeness of their scenes. They have begun collecting scraps of experience without regard to the segregation of facts by logical class. Released from the hug of pleasure and nurture, they have toddled into space, learning to dwell, to feel at home. Those first acts of occupation deposit a core of connection in the memory.
Were it me, were I the one who would come to build, there would be red clay and pale curls of wood. There would be an orchard outside and shotguns in the hallway. Thick white paint on rough pine boards would connote home and call to mind the soft sounds of dogs and old men on the porch, the cool feel of linoleum on the kitchen floor, the smells of bacon frying. A woman’s lilt, an endless melody strung of hymns to Jesus, would wander through it, accompanied by the brisk whisks of a broom.
As we grow, memory runs wild, undirected by future projects. Culture accumulates into an inner resource of association and gathers order aesthetically. This feels good, that bad, while experience widens, memories deepen, and culture complicates through learning.
When the builder’s attention is narrowed by training, whether in the dusty shop of a master carpenter or the sleek classroom of a university, past experience is not obliterated. It endures in the strange caves of the brain and in the old habits of the muscles as they seek smooth routes through the air. Education adds a layer. In precept and admonition, in pedagogical technique, if not in content, the teacher brings cultural values into the process of transmission. Students obey or rebel. Inwardly, new ideas mix and coexist with old ones, and the mind, fed by the senses, continues to bounce about, unfettered by consistency. Resolution will come in performance, in dedicated, situated instants of concentration, while planning meets accidents and learning continues.
Despite the rigors of training, the architect remains a full person, at once competent and confused. The building shares in its builder’s confusions. It seems right, as a result, because it incorporates the experience that the architect shares — not completely, of course, but completely enough — with those who do not build, but who look at buildings and go into them. The building works because it integrates the tight routines of professional practice with the loose expanse of cultural association. The overtly architectural contrivance covertly absorbs the norms of beauty and social exchange and political order with which the architect, as a member of society, has come to feel at ease.
Architecture is like any realization of potential, like any projection of thought. The things of the world — this sentence, that palace — preceded themselves in the mind as plans. Plans blend memories with a reading of the immediate situation. They are realized in things. They can be reversed in analysis. Things become plans, plans disaggregate into sets of decisions, decisions become intentions. All creations bespeak their creators. They stand before us as images of will and wit. In this, architecture is like other things, and there are no differences among kinds of building. All are cultural creations, orderings of experience, like poems and rituals.
Ağzıkarahan, Turkey. 1982
Vale, Guernsey, Channel Islands. 1982
If every building is a cultural fact, the consequence of a collision between intentions and conditions, if differences of culture and circumstance adequately account for differences among buildings, the question is why we persist in calling some of them vernacular. There are answers.
Few kinds of building have been accorded full study. When we isolate from the world a neglected architectural variety and name it vernacular, we have prepared it for analysis. The term marks the transition from the unknown to the known. The study of vernacular architecture is a way that we expand the record, bit by bit. At work, moving toward a complete view of the builder’s art, we bring buildings into scrutiny and toward utility in the comprehensive study of humankind.
Buildings are neglected for different reasons. Some are the exotic products of indigenous people in places unknown to us. But others are familiar, maybe too familiar. The architectural historian who lavishes attention yet again on some canonical monument probably lives in a house of a kind that has wholly eluded serious study. Pondering why some buildings get studied and others do not, we are likely to argue that some buildings are important and others are not. Then pondering the emptiness of that answer, we find that important buildings can be interpreted as displays of the values we value — grandeur, perhaps, or originality — while unimportant buildings display values that we have not yet learned to appreciate. Neglect is a sign of ignorance. The term, I repeat, marks the transition from the unknown to the known: we call buildings vernacular
because they embody values alien to those cherished in the academy. When we called buildings folk,
the implication was that they countered in commonness and tradition the pretense and progress that dominate simple academic schemes. Folk buildings contained a different virtue. The study of vernacular architecture, through its urge toward the comprehensive, accommodates cultural diversity. It welcomes the neglected into study in order to acknowledge the reality of difference and conflict.
Should we wonder why architectural study has aped the study of art in its erection of a canon of important buildings, we will find, on reflection, a host of causes. One of them has to do with the ease of procedure. Selecting a few buildings, a few architects, and then linking them up chronologically, we can borrow the facile techniques of the historian of great men and events. But taking the comprehensive view and recognizing diversity, the study of vernacular architecture drives toward better historical procedures, ones that focus existentially on action and lead to the construction of a multiplex idea of time. We call buildings vernacular to highlight the cultural and contingent nature of all building.
Proposing distinctions and labeling buildings along the way, the study of vernacular architecture is an approach to the whole of the built world. It favors completeness, recognizes diversity, and seeks ways to use buildings as evidence in order to tell better versions of the human story. In the future, it will be obsolete, but now the term vernacular
is one of the tools we use when we face architectural objects with a wish to crack them open and learn their meanings.
Materialization
Architecture works in space as history works in time. History interrupts time’s ceaseless flow, segmenting and reordering it on behalf of the human need for meaning. Architecture intrudes in the limitless expanse of space, dividing it into useful, comprehensible pieces. Converting space into places through disruption, architecture brings meaning to the spatial dimension.
With astronomy as the extreme instance, the architectural impulse begins in exploration and naming. The baby crawls upon a softness that matures in meaning as time passes and names pile up: the softness is a rug, it is a red rug, it is a mediocre late nineteenth-century eagle Kazak. The explorer ventures into unknown territory to parcel and claim it with names that commemorate his heroism. Through time, names accumulate on the land and combine to recall its history: the sequence of settlement, the conflict between the invader and the native.
The name is a fleeting means for bringing history into space and marking the land as meaningful. Marking becomes firmer with physical alteration, when a trail is blazed through a forest, or one stone is piled on another to set a limit. More stones confirm the limit and rise into walls: the wall the Chinese built that turned the mounted warriors westward toward Europe, the wall the Romans struck across Britain to cede the heathy highlands to the wild men of the north, the walls of forts along the borders, the walls of prisons and gated communities, the walls of the cottage where the bold thresherman, his day’s work done, dandles the baby on his knee.
With the act of physical alteration that calls time into space, implying a past and a future, and with the walls that divide space, at once including and excluding, architecture has happened.
Architecture gives physical form to claims and names, to memories and hopes. As a conceptual activity, architecture is a matter of forming ideas into plans, plans into things that other people can see. Architecture shapes relations between people. It is a kind of communication. The mode of its thinking connects architecture to all of culture, but its mode of realization distinguishes it from other varieties of communication. To be architecture, it must be realized in materials.
The decision to create a building is the decision to destroy some part of the material universe. Things are wrecked — trees are toppled, stone is broken, old houses are razed — to make life better. The desire is for improvement. The process of the desire is technological.
Technology is a corollary of human existence. It is the means of our extension into space, as natural to people as swimming is to fish. As life unfolds, every technological act brings changes in two great relations: the one that always connects the human and nonhuman spheres, the other that is built to connect people