Handbook of Supportive and Palliative Radiation Oncology
()
About this ebook
Handbook of Supportive and Palliative Radiation Oncology serves as a practical tool and rapid reference to assist radiation oncology practitioners in direct patient care with common palliative care issues. Containing the most recent advances in translational palliative care research, each chapter is organized in a succinct fashion to discuss major symptom burdens, suggested assessment, and various management options. Each symptom and disease section is written to be a rapid, practical guide for clinicians on the floor.
The book starts with general approaches in palliative radiation oncology that are followed by a section that focuses on common symptoms in palliative care and their management. The next section of the book is devoted to site and disease-specific evaluation, intervention, and management.
This handbook provides general guidelines and management recommendations for common clinical vignettes encountered by palliative radiation oncology practitioners and supported by palliative radiation oncology research. Concise references are cited to support treatment recommendation.
- Provides a quick reference for the busy clinician
- Details standard of care resources for researchers of palliative and supportive care
- Contains updated standards of care for palliative medicine and a list of common medications and dosages
- Includes a comprehensive index by symptom and condition to facilitate quick reference
Monica S Krishnan
Monica Krishnan is an attending physician at the Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women’s Cancer Centers at South Shore and Milford. She has developed a palliative radiation clinic at these community cancer centers, working in tandem with the Supportive and Palliative Radiation Oncology (SPRO) program at the main campus in Boston. She has a strong interest in palliative radiation and has done extensive research assessing prognostication and its role in treatment decision making.
Related to Handbook of Supportive and Palliative Radiation Oncology
Related ebooks
The Question of Competence: Reconsidering Medical Education in the Twenty-First Century Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOutsmarting Diabetes: A Dynamic Approach for Reducing the Effects of Insulin-Dependent Diabetes Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Palliative Care: A Different Kind of Hope Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFundamental Aspects of Long Term Conditions Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHospice Palliative Home Care and Bereavement Support: Nursing Interventions and Supportive Care Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDiagnostic Features of Disease: Based on French's Index of Differential Diagnosis Rating: 1 out of 5 stars1/5Acute Medicine, third edition Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSoul Service: A Hospice Guide to the Emotional and Spiritual Care for the Dying Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsClinical Data Interpretation for Medical Finals: Single Best Answer Questions Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsABC of Tubes, Drains, Lines and Frames Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPrognosis: Poor: One Doctor's Personal Account of the Beauty and the Perils of Modern Medical Training Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAmerican Cancer Society's Guide to Pain Control: Understanding and Managing Cancer Pain Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Infectious Diseases: Smart Study Guide for Medical Students, Residents, and Clinical Providers Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSome Light at the End: Your Bedside Guide for Peaceful Palliative and Hospice Care Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsManaging Breathlessness in the Community Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Medical Decision Making Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Blood Works: An Owner's Guide: What Every Person Needs to Know BEFORE They Are a Patient Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The New Art Of Dying Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDisease Control Priorities, Third Edition (Volume 1): Essential Surgery Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsECGs for Nurses Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSpecific Heart Muscle Disease Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDiabetic Foot Care: Case Studies in Clinical Management Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsJourney’S End: Death, Dying, and the End of Life Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWhen Your Doctor Has Bad News: Simple Steps to Strength, Healing, and Hope Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Conversation: A Revolutionary Plan for End-of-Life Care Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Long Days, Last Days . . . a down-to-earth guide for those at the bedside Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Really Practical Handbook of Children’s Palliative Care Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Essential Eldercare Handbook for Nevada Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMedical Record Librarian: Passbooks Study Guide Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWhen the Time Comes: Stories from the end of life Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Medical For You
Tight Hip Twisted Core: The Key To Unresolved Pain Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Obesity Code: the bestselling guide to unlocking the secrets of weight loss Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The 40 Day Dopamine Fast Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Hormone Reset Diet: Heal Your Metabolism to Lose Up to 15 Pounds in 21 Days Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5ATOMIC HABITS:: How to Disagree With Your Brain so You Can Break Bad Habits and End Negative Thinking Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Peptide Protocols: Volume One Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Mediterranean Diet Meal Prep Cookbook: Easy And Healthy Recipes You Can Meal Prep For The Week Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Gut: The Inside Story of Our Body's Most Underrated Organ (Revised Edition) Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Living Daily With Adult ADD or ADHD: 365 Tips o the Day Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Mating in Captivity: Unlocking Erotic Intelligence Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5What Happened to You?: Conversations on Trauma, Resilience, and Healing Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Diabetes Code: Prevent and Reverse Type 2 Diabetes Naturally Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Vagina Bible: The Vulva and the Vagina: Separating the Myth from the Medicine Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Women With Attention Deficit Disorder: Embrace Your Differences and Transform Your Life Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Adult ADHD: How to Succeed as a Hunter in a Farmer's World Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Summary of Dr. Gundry's Diet Evolution: Turn off the Genes That Are Killing You and Your Waistline Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Holistic Herbal: A Safe and Practical Guide to Making and Using Herbal Remedies Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Hidden Lives: True Stories from People Who Live with Mental Illness Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Amazing Liver and Gallbladder Flush Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5WomanCode: Perfect Your Cycle, Amplify Your Fertility, Supercharge Your Sex Drive, and Become a Power Source Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Herbal Healing for Women Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Big Fat Surprise: Why Butter, Meat and Cheese Belong in a Healthy Diet Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Song of the Cell: An Exploration of Medicine and the New Human Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5As Nature Made Him: The Boy Who Was Raised as a Girl Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5"Cause Unknown": The Epidemic of Sudden Deaths in 2021 & 2022 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5
Related categories
Reviews for Handbook of Supportive and Palliative Radiation Oncology
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
Handbook of Supportive and Palliative Radiation Oncology - Monica S Krishnan
reality.
Part I
Issues in Supportive and Palliative Radiation Oncology
Outline
Chapter 1 General Approach to Palliative Care and Palliative Radiation Oncology
Chapter 2 Communication
Chapter 3 Prognostication in Patients Receiving Palliative Radiation Therapy
Chapter 4 Palliative Care, Hospice Care, Advance Care Planning, and Advance Directives
Chapter 5 Palliative Care Assessment
Chapter 1
General Approach to Palliative Care and Palliative Radiation Oncology
C.C. Johnstone¹ and S. Lutz², ¹Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States, ²Blanchard Valley Regional Cancer Center, Findlay, OH, United States
Abstract
Cancer is a global problem with an estimated 14.1 million cancer cases worldwide in 2012 and there were 8.2 million cancer deaths. The treatment of patients with advanced cancer is a multidisciplinary effort that requires careful coordination. Prognostication and accurate estimates of life expectancy are essential for goal setting and appropriate treatment selection. Patients with advanced cancer have unmet spiritual needs; simple acronyms and tools can help physicians take a spiritual history and start the conversation as part of a comprehensive patient-centered approach.
Increasingly, quality metrics surrounding the appropriate use of aggressive therapies such as longer course palliative radiation and chemotherapy at the end of life are being developed. Avoidance of radiation therapy (RT), especially long-courses of radiation therapy, at the end of life is important given the delayed palliative effect of RT. Whenever possible, the shortest course of RT likely to have the desired effect should be employed. This maximizes patient comfort and convenience and minimizes cost and toxicity. Similarly, chemotherapy may not be appropriate in the last month of life.
Keywords
Palliative care; radiation therapy; life expectancy; prognostication; spirituality; symptom management
Chapter Outline
Introduction 3
Life Expectancy and Prognostication 4
Religion and Spirituality 4
Relief of Pain and Suffering 8
Palliative Radiation Therapy 8
Efficacy of Palliative Radiation Therapy 10
Emerging Technologies 12
Radiation Therapy Planning and Delivery 13
Side Effects of Radiation Therapy 13
Guidelines and Quality Measures 14
Bone Metastasis 14
End-of-Life Radiation Therapy 14
Conclusion 15
List of Abbreviations 16
References 16
Introduction
The burden of cancer continues to increase in the United States and globally, with an estimated 14.1 million cancer cases worldwide in 2012 that is projected to increase to 19.3 million cases by 2025. In 2012, there were 8.2 million cancer deaths and 32.6 million people living with cancer [1]. Thus, the need for good palliative care (PC) is also increasing globally.
Ideally, PC is a multi- and interdisciplinary effort. Emerging in the PC world is the notion that there are two fundamental categories of PC. The first is generalized PC knowledge that every person who provides health care to patients with cancer should have. The second category is a more specialized skill set that caregivers who focus their time in PC should have [2]. This is partly in recognition of the shortage of PC specialists worldwide [2–4].
The function of PC is to reduce pain and suffering, allow discussions of goals of care, facilitate death with dignity, promote quality-of-life, and support patients, their families, and their caregivers. The assessment includes pain and symptom assessment as well as an assessment of the social and spiritual context. Patients whose spirituality is supported by the medical team have experienced better outcomes and quality of life [5–7]. After a complete assessment, prognostication about the illness trajectory, the expected timelines and maximizing the goals that are important to the patient come into play.
Life Expectancy and Prognostication
Questions about life expectancy and the quality of that remaining life are extremely important to patients with metastatic cancer. Physicians and other health care providers often overestimate life expectancy, by as much as 3 months or more [8]. Accurate estimates of life expectancy are important to patients and physicians for many reasons. It helps set appropriate goals, avoid treatments that will have little or no benefit, and choose supportive care or treatments that will be effective within the remaining time.
From the literature on clinical prediction and prognostication, several themes emerge. Clinical prediction tends to overestimate survival, but those clinical estimates improve over time with repeated encounters. The strongest prognostic indicators are the patient’s performance status, the presence of the symptom cluster known as the terminal syndrome (dyspnea, dysphagia, dry mouth, anorexia, and weight loss) and the presence of cognitive failure or confusion [9].
Many of the existing prognostic indicators are best near the EOL. A simple, easy to use and validated tool to predict life expectancy is very much needed. Several tools exist (Table 1.1) and have been studied in patients with advanced or terminal cancer. Each of these tools has limitations. Some are easier to perform and are more generalizable than others. The best use of these tools may be in deciding which patients may not live long enough to see the benefit of a particular treatment. This is particularly true for radiation therapy (RT) as symptom relief typically takes several days to a few weeks for effect. The exception to this is hemostasis, which can often be seen 24–48 hours after the first dose of radiation. Some have advocated chemotherapy delivery within the last month of life as a metric of overutilization of health care [24,25]. Similar metrics may follow for RT [26].
Table 1.1
Tools to Help Assess Life Expectancy in Patients With Cancer
Religion and Spirituality
Multiple studies have surveyed patients in various settings about their desire to have their health care team inquire about their spiritual or religious beliefs or pray with them. As the severity of illness increases, the proportion of patients who want their spiritual beliefs considered increases. Ninety-four percent of outpatients favor discussion of spirituality in the setting of grave illness [27]. Yet, in another series, 68% of inpatients said that no physician had ever assessed their spiritual or religious needs [28]. Many patients with advanced and life-threatening malignancies do not feel that their spiritual needs are met [29].
There are spiritual coping and methods that health care providers can use to deliver more holistic care to patients with cancer [30]. PC providers can also be taught how to incorporate a discussion of religion and spirituality into the care that they deliver and support those needs of the patients they care for. One commonly cited barrier noted by medical practitioners is the lack of training about how to provide such care [31].
Though many use the terms religion and spirituality interchangeably, there is a distinction between them. Spirituality takes into account one’s view of transcendent and existential questions. Religion is a subset of spirituality surrounding a set of texts, practices, and beliefs shared by a particular community [32].
Though many physicians think religious figures and spiritual care experts should be the ones to discuss spirituality and religion, a national consensus conference determined that all members of the health care team are responsible for addressing patient’s spiritual issues in the context of the biopsychosocial framework. This consensus panel recommended that all patients be screened with a spiritual history and that any spiritual distress should be diagnosed and attended to using validated assessment tools [33].
One such validated tool is the FICA spiritual history tool [34]. This relatively simple tool uses the acronym FICA as follows: F represents faith, belief, or meaning; I stands for importance and influence; C for community; and A represents address or action in care. The key principles of this tool are to assess if a particular person has a set of beliefs or a particular faith that gives meaning to their lives. The next step is to assess how this faith or spirituality helps them cope with stress or how it affects their health care decisions. If they belong to a community of like-minded individuals, how does this community affect their lives? The last step is for the health care team to address these issues as part of the patient’s care (Table 1.2).
Table 1.2
FICA Spiritual History Tool [34]
Relief of Pain and Suffering
Alleviating pain and suffering is a comprehensive multidisciplinary effort that uses a combination of counseling and educating, medications, and therapeutic interventions. This text aims to provide a comprehensive approach to symptom control in patients with advanced cancer [35,36].
Palliative Radiation Therapy
External beam RT is a key component of palliative cancer care. It is useful to treat pain due to osseous metastasis or local tumor invasion, bleeding, obstruction, dyspnea, or cough, and functional impairment due to brain metastasis or impingement of nerve roots or the spinal cord.
Key in the utilization of RT is the selection of the shortest fractionation regimen that is effective to maximize patient and caregiver convenience and minimize toxicity and cost [37–40].
Though many believe that longer courses of RT have a more durable effect, there is no data to support this belief. In the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG), patient selection was designed to enroll only those with a long expected survival. There was no difference in efficacy between 8 Gy in a single fraction and 30 Gy in 10 fractions [37]. Similarly, in an analysis of those patients who survived more than 52 weeks in the Dutch Bone Metastasis Study, there was no difference in response rate, time to response, duration of response, and time to progression of pain (Table 1.3) [41]. Randomized trials have confirmed the equivalence of short courses of RT in lung cancer [42–44] and bladder cancer [45] and hypofractionated radiation regimens have been successfully used to treat gynecologic, gastrointestinal, and head and neck malignancies [39].
Table 1.3
Results From the Dutch Bone Metastasis Trial in Patients Surviving >1 Year
One reason commonly cited in favor of multifraction regimens for the treatment of bone metastasis over those with higher dose per fraction regimens is the potential for pathologic fracture. In the analysis of the RTOG 97-14, there was no difference in the long-term risk of pathologic fracture with the single fraction regimen of 8 Gy when compared to multifraction regimen of 30 Gy in 10 fractions [46]. The initial report of the Dutch Bone Metastasis Study did show higher rates of pathologic fracture in the single fraction arm, but a subsequent analysis that corrected for the percent of cortical destruction did not demonstrate a difference in fracture rates between treatment arms [47,48]. This was confirmed in a large meta-analysis [49]. For patients with >30% cortical destruction, prophy-lactic change there may be cases where higher doses of RT are appropriate, including bone metastases with a large soft tissue component, osteolytic lesions with impending pathologic fracture, or patients with a symptomatic pathologic fracture [50]. Longer courses in these settings may help promote remineralization and tumor control, which is important for those patients with a longer life expectancy. After pathologic fracture and surgical intervention, it may be difficult to assess efficacy of single-fraction treatment. Optimal fractionation remains controversial; a single trial of patients with neuropathic pain from bone metastases did not show superiority for either 20 Gy in 5 fractions or a single 8 Gy fraction [51].
Various clinical scenarios are depicted in Tables 1.4–1.8 with appropriate treatment options based on a patient’s life expectancy.
Table 1.4
Palliative Radiation Fractionation Schemes for Bone Metastasis
Table 1.5
Palliative Radiation Fractionation Schemes for Spinal Cord Compression
Table 1.6
Palliative Radiation Fractionation Schemes for Brain Metastasis
Table 1.7
Palliative Radiation Fractionation Schemes for Lung Tumors
Table 1.8
Palliative Radiation Fractionation Schemes for Bleeding
Efficacy of Palliative Radiation Therapy
RT provides time-efficient and effective pain relief with few side effects. It can be extremely useful in patients who are intolerant of opioid analgesics and can decrease the need for opioids thus reducing the systemic side effects of opioids. The vast majority of patients respond to RT, with 60–80% having a partial response and 25–30% experiencing a complete response to treatment. Radioresistant tumors, such as sarcoma or renal cell carcinoma, are palliated by RT and may benefit from fractionation schemes with higher dose per fraction [52].
Pain relief is not immediate after the initiation of RT. Patients can experience some relief within a few days or a week after the completion of treatment but the full palliative may not be seen until 4–6 weeks after the completion of treatment. Patients who are not expected to live this long may be better palliated using pain medications or other interventions. Since pain relief is not immediate, and RT requires patient immobilization for 15–30 minutes for treatment delivery, adequate pain control prior to the initiation of therapy is important. A helpful guide to pain medication dosing has been described by the World Health Organization [53]. These regimens may include nonsteroidal antiinflammatory agents, narcotic analgesics, or adjuvant pain medicines such as corticosteroids, nerve-stabilizing medicines, or antidepressants.
The pain relief provided by RT is variable, but typically lasts several months or longer. In patients who experience progression of pain, retreatment can be considered. In the NCIC study of retreatment, the initial course of RT varied and included single-fraction and multifraction schedules with daily fraction sizes of 3–8 Gy [54]. Patients with persistent pain at 4 weeks were randomized to 8 Gy in a single fraction versus 20 Gy in five fractions. There was no difference at two months in the overall response to treatment, pathologic fracture, or development of spinal cord or cauda equina compression. Acute toxicities such as anorexia and diarrhea were less frequent in the single fraction arm [54].
RT palliates symptoms from tumors in the lung with varying frequencies. Hemoptysis is palliated 80–90% of the time, while more complex symptoms such as cough and dyspnea have lower rates of palliation, 60–90% of the time for cough and 40–60% of the time for dyspnea [55–60]. Symptoms from pelvic malignancies are palliated 60–94% of the time [61,62]. Palliative radiation to patients with rectal cancer can help avoid colostomy [63]. The efficacy of palliative radiation will also be addressed in the chapters that follow.
Emerging Technologies
Several emerging technologies, such as stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) are capable of delivering highly conformal high dose radiation to tumor sites while minimizing dose to adjacent normal tissues [64]. It requires fastidious attention to dose planning, patient setup, and localization and may be ideally suited for retreatment situations where the spinal cord has reached tolerance due to the initial definitive course of RT or a previous palliative course of treatment [65]. Treatment regimens for spine lesions include 30 Gy in 5 fractions, 27 Gy in 3 fractions, 40 Gy in 5 fractions, or 16–24 Gy in a single fraction [66–68]. Early results are promising and prospective, randomized data are likely to help define the best use of this technology [69]. Relatively little data exists on the long-term toxicity of very large single doses and there may be a higher risk of long-term side effects than is typically seen with more established treatment approaches [70]. Spine radiosurgery is an area of active clinical investigation and the subject of a current randomized trial [71]. Routine use should be avoided until sufficient evidence justifies the substantive increase in cost relative to standard