Explaining International Relations 1918-1939: A Students Guide
By Nick Shepley
()
About this ebook
1. How did the decisions taken at the Paris Peace Conference affect Europe?
2. How did the decisions taken at the Paris Peace Conference affect Asia?
3. What was the significance of the Washington Naval Conference?
4. What was the significance of the Locarno Treaties?
5. How did the appointment of Hitler in 1933 affect International Relations?
6. What was the impact of the Abyssinia Crisis?
7. How did the Spanish Civil War affect international relations?
8. Why did Britain pursue a policy of appeasement?
9. Why did Stalin and Hitler sign a treaty in 1939?
10. Who is to blame for the outbreak of war in September 1939?
This e-book also features additional advice on essay writing and other related subjects.
Read more from Nick Shepley
Stalin, the Five Year Plans and the Gulags: Slavery and Terror 1929-53 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Paris Peace Conference 1919: A student's guide to the Treaty of Versailles. Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Russian Revolution 1917: A Student's Guide Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSun Yat Sen and the birth of modern China: 20th Century China: Volume One Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Red Sun at War: Pearl Harbour and Japan's Pacific Gamble Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5Hitler, Ribbentrop and Britain: The Breaking of Versailles Part One Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsStory of Cardiff Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsReaction, Revolution and The Birth of Nazism: Germany 1918-23 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHitler, Stalin and the Destruction of Poland Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRussia's Struggle With Modernity 1815-1929 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Red Sun Rising: Japan, China and the West: 1894-1941 Rating: 1 out of 5 stars1/5Hitler, Chamberlain and Munich: The End Of The Twenty Year Truce Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Explaining Britain and Her Empire: 1851-1914: A Student's Guide to Victorian Britain Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAddiction & Recovery Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRed Sun at War Part II: Allied Defeat in the Far East Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related to Explaining International Relations 1918-1939
Related ebooks
Ten Days that Shook the World Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Cinema, Nation, and Empire in Uzbekistan, 1919-1937 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsIn Retreat: America's Withdrawal from the Middle East Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Liberal World Order in Crisis: Choosing between Imposition and Restraint Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMaking the British empire, 1660–1800 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRevolutions in Sovereignty: How Ideas Shaped Modern International Relations Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSecuring the Safety of Navigation in East Asia: Legal and Political Dimensions Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAfrica: A Beginner's Guide Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A United Nations Renaissance: What the UN is, and what it could be Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLanguage and Globalization: The History of Us All Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Price of Terror: Lessons of Lockerbie for a World on the Brink Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Communist Century: From Revolution To Decay: 1917 to 2000 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWriting 20th Century International History: Explorations and Examples Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAmerica-Culture Shock Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPaths toward the Nation: Islam, Community, and Early Nationalist Mobilization in Eritrea, 1941–1961 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Struggle across the Taiwan Strait: The Divided China Problem Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMarxist Developmentalism in North Korea Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Age of Social Democracy: Norway and Sweden in the Twentieth Century Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCowboy Capitalism: European Myths about the American Reality Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Complete Julius Caesar Collection Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRevolution and Counter-Revolution or, Germany in 1848 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Convolutions of Historical Politics Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings(Re)Negotiating East and Southeast Asia: Region, Regionalism, and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Making of Southeast Asia: International Relations of a Region Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThree Months in Soviet Russia (1921) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Latest Catastrophe: History, the Present, the Contemporary Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA History of the Book in America: Volume 5: The Enduring Book: Print Culture in Postwar America Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRevolutionizing a World: From Small States to Universalism in the Pre-Islamic Near East Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe National Origins of Policy Ideas: Knowledge Regimes in the United States, France, Germany, and Denmark Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
International Relations For You
This Is How They Tell Me the World Ends: The Cyberweapons Arms Race Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Inside the CIA Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Doomsday Machine: Confessions of a Nuclear War Planner Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Prisoners of Geography: Ten Maps That Explain Everything About the World Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Art of War Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Palestine Peace Not Apartheid Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Fateful Triangle: The United States, Israel, and the Palestinians (Updated Edition) Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Coup: 1953, the CIA, and the Roots of Modern U.S.-Iranian Relations Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Crazy Like Us: The Globalization of the American Psyche Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Doughnut Economics: Seven Ways to Think Like a 21st-Century Economist Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5From Beirut to Jerusalem Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Can We Talk About Israel?: A Guide for the Curious, Confused, and Conflicted Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Sex and World Peace Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The CIA as Organized Crime: How Illegal Operations Corrupt America and the World Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5When China Attacks: A Warning to America Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBonded Labor: Tackling the System of Slavery in South Asia Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOne Palestine, Complete: Jews and Arabs Under the British Mandate Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Palestine-Israel Conflict: A Basic Introduction Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Narco History: How the United States and Mexico Jointly Created the "Mexican Drug War" Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5In the Garden of Beasts: by Erik Larson | Summary & Analysis: Love, Terror and an American Family in Hitler’s Berlin Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPutin's Playbook: Russia's Secret Plan to Defeat America Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Age of Walls: How Barriers Between Nations Are Changing Our World Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/527 Articles Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5A History of the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict, Second Edition Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Fidel Castro: My Life: A Spoken Autobiography Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5God's Politics: Why the Right Gets It Wrong and the Left Doesn't Get It Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for Explaining International Relations 1918-1939
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
Explaining International Relations 1918-1939 - Nick Shepley
them.
Question 1
How did the decisions taken at the Paris Peace Conference affect Europe?
Following the armistice between Germany and the allied powers in November 1918, a peace conference to decide Germany’s fate was organised and held in Paris, the French capital in January the following year. The conference was far more than a meeting of victorious powers to decide the fate of the defeated former German empire, however, it was perhaps the most important international gathering of the 20th Century because it helped to shape the very nature of the post war world. Four empires (German, Austrian, Russian and Ottoman) had collapsed as a result of the war and new nations had emerged, including Poland, Yugoslavia and Czechoslovakia. The five main victorious powers (Britain, America, France, Japan and Italy) in 1918 had to create the foundations of a new international order while also protecting their own interests. The result was the Treaty Of Versailles and its sister treaties (Sevres, Triannon and Lausanne).
Woodrow Wilson and the conference
America remained neutral in the First World War until April 1917 when German attacks on US shipping to Britain, along with the revelation secret communiques to Mexico to attack America if the USA joined the war, brought the USA into the war on the allied side. The British and the French had become financially reliant on America long before the USA joined the war and US president Woodrow Wilson knew that this gave him the upper hand at the negotiations. He had allied America with the British and French against the Germans but had no great love for any of Europe’s old imperial powers. He had offered Germany a separate peace deal in 1918, deliberately undermining his coalition partners (Wilson did not allow America to become a full ally of Britain and France, instead she was referred to as an associate power). Wilson saw the war as an opportunity to replace Britain, the world’s biggest and wealthiest economy, with the USA. The secret of Britain’s wealth and prestige was her empire and navy. Wilson hoped to undermine both, by building a bigger navy than the British and by arguing for self determination for all nations (including those colonised by Britain and France) at the conference. When Wilson arrived in France by ship, he was greeted with parades and cheering crowds. The French public believed that American intervention had helped save France, but the crowds cheered Wilson because there was a popular belief that he had arrived to help punish Germany. Wilson had little interest initially in punishing Germany, and instead believed that the creation of a new framework of international law would reduce the power of European empires and protect American interests (specifically the right to trade internationally). He also believed that this was the best chance for a lasting peace and thought that legally imposed economic sanctions could deter aggressor nations from invading their neighbours. Wilson refused to visit the battlefields of the western front, believing that if he saw them, he would become too impassioned to apply reason to the negotiations. This was exactly what the French hoped for and were disappointed when the realised that Wilson had not come to Paris to champion France’s cries for revenge.
Georges Clemenceau and the conference
The Prime Minister of France, Clemenceau, wanted a treaty that would permanently weaken Germany and force her to pay for the damage she had done to France. Clemenceau hoped that France and Britain would be able to forge a permanent alliance with America and the three great powers would not only be able to ‘keep Germany down’, but they would be able to stabilise the world following the upheavals of the First World War. He realised as the conference drew on that Wilson’s plans for stabilising the world did not involve becoming permanently involved in the great power politics of Europe, instead, he wanted to create an organisation that would manage diplomacy across the entire world. Wilson proposed a League of Nations (see more on the league in Question 6). Not only was Clemenceau keen to keep Germany weak, but he also suspected that Russia, a country that had undergone a bloody and violent communist revolution in 1917, might easily ally herself with the new German republic that had emerged at the end of the war. To this end, Clemenceau supported a ‘cordon sanitaire’ of new nations in eastern Europe between the two powers. Czechoslovakia, Poland, Hungary and Bulgaria were all given diplomatic, military and economic support by France in the hope that they would become checks on both German and Russian power.
David Lloyd George and the conference
For the British, the First World War was seen as an unmitigated disaster and tragedy. Lloyd George hoped to occupy the middle ground between the idealism of Wilson and the French desire for revenge that Clemenceau embodied. The British were keen to see the world financial system that had benefited Britain for over a century re-established and wartime debts reduced. The Americans were reluctant to let Britain and the other European allies off the hook so easily, realising that they had immense power over Britain as a result of the country’s debts. The British were also seeking to extend their empire into the Middle East (this was a particular interest of Lloyd George’s), and had made a secret arrangement with France in 1915 to do so (see next section). The British delegation at the conference believed it was in their interests to create a stable Europe once again that would not result in the type of war that would engulf them and their empire. However even before the conference began, Lloyd George considered the national feeling of anti German sentiment at home in Britain. A general election in December 1918 saw Lloyd George and his allies in the Conservative Party returned to power, partly on a pledge to ‘make Germany pay’.
Russia
The most significant great power not to be represented at the Paris Peace Conference was Russia. Two revolutions had swept the Russian autocracy and the fledgling democracy of the Provisional Government away in 1917. By the end of 1918 Russia had descended into a bloody civil war and the British, Americans and French had all dispatched armies to Russia to help overthrow the new Bolshevik government. Woodrow Wilson had begun to have misgivings about the invasion of Russia by mid 1918, as had Lloyd George. Neither men were even remotely close the the Bolsheviks in their thinking, but neither had been sympathetic towards the previous autocratic tsarist regime. As the peace conference began, Wilson became more keen to have the Bolshevik government attend the conference, in the hope that they might participate in the development of the League of Nations. Lloyd George hoped that if they Bolsheviks did attend the meetings, some agreement for the repayment of wartime loans to Britain and