Everand Logo

Welcome to Everand!

  • Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

    Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

    Honest to God
    Honest to God
    Honest to God
    Ebook170 pages3 hours

    Honest to God

    By John A. T. Robinson

    ()

    Read preview

    About this ebook

    On first publication in the 1960s, "Honest to God" did more than instigate a passionate debate about the nature of Christian belief in a secular revolution. It epitomised the revolutionary mood of the era and articulated the anxieties of a generation.
    LanguageEnglish
    PublisherSCM Press
    Release dateSep 16, 2014
    ISBN9780334053507
    Honest to God
    Author

    John A. T. Robinson

    John A. T. Robinson was a New Testament scholar who served as Bishop of Woolswich, England as well as Dean of Trinity College, University of Cambridge. Among his many writings are Redating the New Testament, Honest to God, and Wrestling with Romans.

    Related to Honest to God

    Related ebooks

    Christianity For You

    View More
    View More

    Related podcast episodes

    Related articles

    • Article

      John Hendrickson Tells the Truth

      Jan 17, 2023

      Hendrickson's new book, 'Life on Delay,' shows the thorny, complicated reality of stuttering. The post John Hendrickson Tells the Truth appeared first on The Millions.

      7 min read

    • Article

      Defender Of The Faith

      Nov 26, 2020

      Defender Of The Faith
      7 min read

    • Article

      True Believer

      Mar 26, 2019

      True Believer
      5 min read

    • Article

      Book of Uncommon Prayer

      May 3, 2023

      Book of Uncommon Prayer
      3 min read

    • Article

      The Sage of Narnia

      Nov 15, 2023

      The Sage of Narnia
      3 min read

    • Article

      Why The Church Fails To Get Answers From Above

      Jul 28, 2022

      DR JOHN SENTAMU’S REPLACEMENT as Archbishop of York is the Most Reverend Stephen Cottrell. Having been suffragan Bishop of Reading and then Bishop of Chelmsford, holding the Church of England’s second most important job means Cottrell (below) will li

      6 min read

    • Article

      Why Bad Catholics Make Great Art

      Oct 13, 2022

      Some of the best Catholic storytellers achieve their power at a distance from traditional devotion. The post Why Bad Catholics Make Great Art appeared first on The Millions.

      4 min read

    • Article

      The Strange Invention Of Late Antiquity

      Jul 26, 2023

      What makes a good historian? A new book, Journeys of the Mind, by one of the best of the past 50 years, Peter Brown, promises some answers. Brown is the pioneer of a whole way of looking at a historical period, ‘late antiquity’, between the fall of R

      3 min read

    • Article

      Necrolog

      Aug 12, 2021

      Marie-Jeanne Koffmann spent four decades in the mountains and forests of the former USSR in search of the Russian wild man known as the almasty. Born in Paris, she spent most of her life in Russia. She obtained an MD at Moscow University in 1941 and

      5 min read

    • Article

      Why Study Church History?

      Jun 15, 2020

      Why Study Church History?
      3 min read

    • Article

      Ten Ways to Save the World

      Oct 16, 2020

      If imagining yourself as the messiah could get you decapitated by the 10th century Abbasids, then in 20th-century Michigan it only got you institutionalized. The post Ten Ways to Save the World appeared first on The Millions.

      30 min read

    • Article

      Constantine Had Not Converted To Christianity?

      Jul 15, 2021

      INTERVIEW WITH HOWARD DRAKE Dr Drake is professor emeritus at the University of Santa Barbara and specialises in Ancient Rome, with particular emphasis on the fourth century CE and the life of Emperor Constantine. When Constantine became emperor of t

      6 min read

    • Article

      Defining Evangelical

      Dec 7, 2015

      Defining Evangelical
      5 min read

    Related categories

    Reviews for Honest to God

    0 ratings

    0 ratings0 reviews

    What did you think?

    Tap to rate

    Review must be at least 10 words

      Book preview

      Honest to God - John A. T. Robinson

      1

      Reluctant Revolution

      Up There or Out There?

      THE Bible speaks of a God ‘up there’. No doubt its picture of a three-decker universe, of ‘the heaven above, the earth beneath and the waters under the earth’, was once taken quite literally. No doubt also its more sophisticated writers, if pressed, would have been the first to regard this as symbolic language to represent and convey spiritual realities. Yet clearly they were not pressed. Or at any rate they were not oppressed by it. Even such an educated man of the world as St Luke can express the conviction of Christ’s ascension – the conviction that he is not merely alive but reigns in the might and right of God – in the crudest terms of being ‘lifted up’ into heaven, there to sit down at the right hand of the Most High.¹ He feels no need to offer any apology for this language, even though he of all New Testament writers was commending Christianity to what Schleiermacher called its ‘cultured despisers’. This is the more remarkable because, in contrast, he leaves his readers in no doubt that what we might regard as the scarcely more primitive notions of God entertained by the Athenians,² that the deity lives in temples made by man and needs to be served by human hands, were utterly superseded by Christianity.

      Moreover, it is the two most mature theologians of the New Testament, St John and the later Paul, who write most uninhibitedly of this ‘going up’ and ‘coming down’.

      No one has ascended into heaven but he who descended from heaven, the Son of man.³

      Do you take offence at this? Then what if you were to see the Son of man ascending where he was before?⁴

      In saying, ‘He ascended’, what does it mean but that he had also descended into the lower parts of the earth? He who descended is he who also ascended far above all the heavens, that he might fill all things.⁵

      They are able to use this language without any sense of constraint because it had not become an embarrassment to them. Everybody accepted what it meant to speak of a God up there, even though the groundlings might understand it more grossly than the gnostics. For St Paul, no doubt, to be ‘caught up to the third heaven’⁶ was as much a metaphor as it is to us (though for him a considerably more precise metaphor). But he could use it to the spiritually sophisticated at Corinth with no consciousness that he must ‘demythologize’ if he were to make it acceptable.

      For the New Testament writers the idea of a God ‘up there’ created no embarrassment – because it had not yet become a difficulty. For us too it creates little embarrassment – because, for the most part, it has ceased to be a difficulty. We are scarcely even conscious that the majority of the words for what we value most are still in terms of height, though as Edwyn Bevan observed in his Gifford Lectures,⁷ ‘The proposition: Moral and spiritual worth is greater or less in ratio to the distance outwards from the earth’s surface, would certainly seem to be, if stated nakedly like that, an odd proposition.’ Yet it is one that we have long ago found it unnecessary to explain away. We may indeed continue to have to tell our children that heaven is not in fact over their heads nor God literally ‘above the bright blue sky’. Moreover, whatever we may accept with the top of our minds, most of us still retain deep down the mental image of ‘an old man in the sky’. Nevertheless, for most of us most of the time the traditional language of a three-storeyed universe is not a serious obstacle. It does not worry us intellectually, it is not an ‘offence’ to faith, because we have long since made a remarkable transposition, of which we are hardly aware. In fact, we do not realize how crudely spatial much of the Biblical terminology is, for we have ceased to perceive it that way. It is as though when reading a musical score what we actually saw was not the notes printed but the notes of the key into which mentally we were transposing it. There are some notes, as it were, in the Biblical score which still strike us in the old way (the Ascension story, for instance) and which we have to make a conscious effort to transpose, but in general we assimilate the language without trouble.

      For in place of a God who is literally or physically ‘up there’ we have accepted, as part of our mental furniture, a God who is spiritually or metaphysically ‘out there’. There are, of course, those for whom he is almost literally ‘out there’. They may have accepted the Copernican revolution in science, but until recently at any rate they have still been able to think of God as in some way ‘beyond’ outer space. In fact the number of people who instinctively seem to feel that it is no longer possible to believe in God in the space-age shows how crudely physical much of this thinking about a God ‘out there’ has been. Until the last recesses of the cosmos had been explored or were capable of being explored (by radio-telescope if not by rocketry), it was still possible to locate God mentally in some terra incognita. But now it seems there is no room for him, not merely in the inn, but in the entire universe: for there are no vacant places left. In reality, of course, our new view of the universe has made not the slightest difference. Indeed, the limit set to ‘space’ by the speed of light (so that beyond a certain point – not all that much further than our present range – everything recedes over the horizon of visibility) is even more severe. And there is nothing to stop us, if we wish to, locating God ‘beyond’ it. And there he would be quite invulnerable – in a ‘gap’ science could never fill. But in fact the coming of the space-age has destroyed this crude projection of God – and for that we should be grateful. For if God is ‘beyond’, he is not literally beyond anything.

      But the idea of a God spiritually or metaphysically ‘out there’ dies very much harder. Indeed, most people would be seriously disturbed by the thought that it should need to die at all. For it is their God, and they have nothing to put in its place. And for the words ‘they’ and ‘their’ it would be more honest to substitute ‘we’ and ‘our’. For it is the God of our own upbringing and conversation, the God of our fathers and of our religion, who is under attack. Every one of us lives with some mental picture of a God ‘out there’, a God who ‘exists’ above and beyond the world he made, a God ‘to’ whom we pray and to whom we ‘go’ when we die. In traditional Christian theology, the doctrine of the Trinity witnesses to the self-subsistence of this divine Being outside us and apart from us. The doctrine of creation asserts that at a moment of time this God called ‘the world’ into existence over against himself. The Biblical record describes how he proceeds to enter into contact with those whom he has made, how he establishes a ‘covenant’ with them, how he ‘sends’ to them his prophets, and how in the fullness of time he ‘visits’ them in the person of his Son, who must one day ‘come again’ to gather the faithful to himself.

      This picture of a God ‘out there’ coming to earth like some visitor from outer space underlies every popular presentation of the Christian drama of salvation, whether from the pulpit or the presses. Indeed, it is noticeable that those who have been most successful in communicating it in our day – Dorothy Sayers, C. S. Lewis, J. B. Phillips – have hesitated least in being boldly anthropomorphic in the use of this language. They have not, of course, taken it literally, any more than the New Testament writers take literally the God ‘up there’, but they have not apparently felt it any embarrassment to the setting forth of the Gospel. This is sufficient testimony to the fact that there is a ready-made public for whom this whole frame of reference still presents no difficulties, and their very achievement should make us hesitate to pull it down or call it in question.

      Indeed, the last thing I want to do is to appear to criticize from a superior position. I should like to think that it were possible to use this mythological language of the God ‘out there’ and make the same utterly natural and unself-conscious transposition as I have suggested we already do with the language of the God ‘up there’. Indeed, unless we become used to doing this and are able to take this theological notation, as it were, in our stride, we shall cut ourselves off from the classics of the Christian faith, just as we should be unable to read the Bible were we to stumble at its way of describing God. I believe, however, that we may have to pass through a century or more of reappraisal before this becomes possible and before this language ceases to be an offence to faith for a great many people. No one wants to live in such a period, and one could heartily wish it were not necessary. But the signs are that we are reaching the point at which the whole conception of a God ‘out there’, which has served us so well since the collapse of the three-decker universe, is itself becoming more of a hindrance than a

      Enjoying the preview?
      Page 1 of 1