These Islands: A Letter to Britain
()
About this ebook
With These Islands, Ali M. Ansari considers the idea of Britain as a political entity. This idea of Britain considers some nationalists as suppressed minorities in need of attention, and others as bigoted throwbacks to a more divisive age. Arguing the case for Great Britain from the perspective of the political mythology of the British state—with an emphasis on culture, ideas and narrative constructions—Ansari makes the claim that Britain’s strength lies in its ability to shape the popular imagination, both at home and abroad. He concludes that an “excess of enthusiasm” may yet do untold damage to the fabric of a state and society that has been carefully constructed over the centuries and may not be easily repaired.
Related to These Islands
Related ebooks
A minority and the state: Travellers in Britain in the twentieth century Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBest of Enemies Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDistilling the Frenzy: Writing the History of One's Own Timed Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPartisan Politics: Looking for Consensus in Eighteenth-Century Towns Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsInvading America: The English Assault on the New World, 1497–1630 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Britain BC: Life in Britain and Ireland Before the Romans (Text Only) Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5From Castle Rackrent to Castle Dracula: Anglo-Irish Agrarian Fiction from the 19th Century Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEmpires of the Weak: The Real Story of European Expansion and the Creation of the New World Order Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Acts of Union and Disunion Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5This Whispering in Our Hearts Revisited Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA History of Ireland and Her People Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFictions of Consent: Slavery, Servitude, and Free Service in Early Modern England Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBeing British: Our Once And Future Selves Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWhen the Clock Struck in 1916 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Story of Britain Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsStrangers Within the Realm: Cultural Margins of the First British Empire Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Colonial Identity in the Atlantic World, 1500-1800 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBritain and its internal others, 1750–1800: Under rule of law Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEighteenth-Century Ireland (New Gill History of Ireland 4): The Isle of Slaves – The Protestant Ascendancy in Ireland Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSoliloquies in England, and Later Soliloquies Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Manchester Martyrs Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Crown, Church and Constitution: Popular Conservatism in England, 1815-1867 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEmpire and After: Englishness in Postcolonial Perspective Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFighting Napoleon at Home: The Real Story of a Nation at War With Itself Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsInsurgent Empire: Anticolonial Resistance and British Dissent Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Beginners of a Nation Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPublic Speech and the Culture of Public Life in the Age of Gladstone Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Leveller Revolution: Radical Political Organisation in England, 1640–1650 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Idle Hours in a Library Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Development of the European Nations, 1870-1914 (5th ed.) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
International Relations For You
This Is How They Tell Me the World Ends: The Cyberweapons Arms Race Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Crazy Like Us: The Globalization of the American Psyche Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Inside the CIA Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Art of War Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Prisoners of Geography: Ten Maps That Explain Everything About the World Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Doomsday Machine: Confessions of a Nuclear War Planner Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Doughnut Economics: Seven Ways to Think Like a 21st-Century Economist Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5When China Attacks: A Warning to America Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCan We Talk About Israel?: A Guide for the Curious, Confused, and Conflicted Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Fateful Triangle: The United States, Israel, and the Palestinians (Updated Edition) Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Palestine Peace Not Apartheid Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Sex and World Peace Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5From Beirut to Jerusalem Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Age of Walls: How Barriers Between Nations Are Changing Our World Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Putin's Playbook: Russia's Secret Plan to Defeat America Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Palestine-Israel Conflict: A Basic Introduction Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Coup: 1953, the CIA, and the Roots of Modern U.S.-Iranian Relations Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The CIA as Organized Crime: How Illegal Operations Corrupt America and the World Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/527 Articles Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5In the Garden of Beasts: by Erik Larson | Summary & Analysis: Love, Terror and an American Family in Hitler’s Berlin Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBonded Labor: Tackling the System of Slavery in South Asia Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA History of the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict, Second Edition Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5God's Politics: Why the Right Gets It Wrong and the Left Doesn't Get It Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5One Palestine, Complete: Jews and Arabs Under the British Mandate Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The War of Return: How Western Indulgence of the Palestinian Dream Has Obstructed the Path to Peace Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related categories
Reviews for These Islands
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
These Islands - Ali M. Ansari
alone.
Introduction
Why me?
A native of Iran and an historian of that country, I settled in the United Kingdom at the age of ten, from which time I developed an acute, if personal, appreciation of Britain. Born in Rome, educated in London, living and working in the Kingdom of Fife, I have long been comfortable with a multilayered identity that complements and informs. I self-identify as British-Iranian. This essay represents my first attempt to address the question(s) of the country of my adoption, and my view is of one who stands at the crossroads of cultures. I take encouragement, in this otherwise daunting task, from the fact that being on the ‘borderlands’ has not precluded others from presenting their assessments of their adopted countries,² nor indeed prevented many excellent histories of Iran from being written by Britons. To paraphrase Kipling, what should they know of Britain who only Britain know?
Why do I write?³
A few years back, in the run-up to the referendum on Scottish independence, I went to dinner at the house of some close friends. Inevitably the issue of the referendum was raised along with broader questions about the value or otherwise of the British state. All of us agreed that ‘Britain’ had problems, but I stressed that I still considered my greatest – most treasured – possession to be my British passport. It is still unclear to me who was more surprised: my colleagues, who reacted to my statement with a mixture of puzzlement and surprise, or myself, being nonplussed by my colleagues’ reaction. I quickly explained that the passport signified security and stability – a refuge, if you will, from an otherwise turbulent world – and that this in itself was an invaluable asset.
There was a time when British ‘exceptionalism’ in this particular respect was widely acknowledged. Long before people got used to berating the British Empire, many applauded British stability, the ability of the people of these islands to govern and indeed regulate themselves with such skill and efficiency and the fact that they had established what appeared to be an organic political harmony that was the envy of their revolutionary neighbours. It may have been less interesting – even a tad boring – but who needed interesting when the consequences of revolution were so disruptive? So comfortable and confident had Britain become in its political skin that it in fact became a refuge for both those escaping persecution and turmoil and, with no hint of irony, to revolutionaries from other countries – the most famous perhaps being Karl Marx.
The truth is that Britain has long been a refuge, even a sanctuary, for those fleeing persecution. Immigrants, and political refugees in particular, have long been part of the fabric of the British state and, one might add, the British sense of itself as the quintessentially ‘liberal’ state, both in its political definition and in terms of generosity of spirit. George Orwell considered the civilisation that characterised these islands as ‘gentle’ – a term that is ambiguous enough to be open to interpretation but is as good as any to convey the essence of a Britain that was comfortable, if not necessarily confident, in itself.⁴ It should come as no surprise that these immigrants have often had a more acute appreciation of that essence than those who are native born, for whom the contradictions are all too apparent and the failings all too real.⁵ Indeed, it is a fact that those who seek to define a community often come from its margins. It is at the political borders, the wider hinterland – the point of highest tension, if you will – that clarity can most easily be achieved, and is most enthusiastically