Zephyrus: The Intermissive paraidentity of Waldo Vieira

Zephyrus – The Intermissive Paraidentity of Waldo Vieira

Original title in Portuguese: Zéfiro – A Paraidentidade Intermissiva de Waldo Vieira

Copyright © 2018 – Editares International Association

The authorial rights of this edition were graciously granted by the author to Editares.

The opinions expressed in this book are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the position of Editares.

ISBN: 978-85-8477-105-9

Translation: Maria Helena Balthazar, Rui Ferreira and Sergio Fernandes.

Revision: Igor Cabral, Jeffrey Lloyd and Juliana Nicolau.

Proofreading: Adriana Faria de Escalada and Ana Firmato.

Cover: Luciano Mello.

EDITARES INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION

Av. Felipe Wandscheer, 6200, sala 107, Cognópolis

Foz do Iguaçu, PR – Brasil – CEP 85856-530

Tel/Fax: 45 2102 1407

E-mail: editares@editares.org

Website: www.editares.org

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Mabel Teles is a professor, a graduate in social communication, and specialist in the didactics of higher education with a master’s degree in business administration.

She encountered conscientiology in 1993 and, since 1994, has been a teacher and researcher, with international experience in the United States and Europe.

Author of the book Prophylaxis against Consciential Manipulation, several articles and verbetes of the Encyclopaedia of Conscientiology, she is currently a volunteer at UNIESCON, a conscientiocentric institution constituted by authors of conscientiological works.

SUMMARY

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

NOTE FOR THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE E-BOOK EDITION

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

INTRODUCTION

Section I

SERIEXIOLOGY

01. Presentation

02. Intermissive Paraidentity

03. Onomastics: The Origin of the Name Zephyrus

04. Consecutive Personalities Of Zephyrus

05. Waldo Vieira: The resoma of Zephyrus in the 20th Century

Section II

INTERMISSIOLOGY

06. The Year 1100: A Glimpse of the Reurbex

07. Paraprovenance: Zephyrus’ Extraphysical Base

08. Interassistantial Interdimensional Communication

09. Resomatology: from Preresomatics to Rebirth in Monte Carmelo

10. The Role of Resomatic Attractor in the Conscientiological Maxiproexis

Section III

PROFILOGY

11. Paracastology: The Circle of Extraphysical Friendships

12. Zephyrus under the Optics of Conscientiometry

13. Prospectology: Reurbex on the African Continent

14. Final Considerations

BIBLIOGRAPHIC REFERENCES

GENERAL INDEX

GEOGRAPHIC INDEX

ONOMASTIC INDEX

COGNOPOLIS, THE CITY OF KNOWLEDGE

CONSCIENTIOCENTRIC INSTITUTIONS (ICS)

NOTE FOR THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE E-BOOK EDITION

The book that the reader has in their hands is the English language translation of the 1st edition published in the Portuguese, in 2014, by the publisher Editares.

The work presents the evolutionary trajectory of Brazilian researcher Waldo Vieira (1932-2015), proposer of the science conscientiology, and takes into consideration his past lives and intermissive periods. The guiding thread of the narrative lies in the study of the consciex Zephyrus, the designation Vieira has been known by in the extraphysical dimensions since Antiquity.

The book was primarily conceived through the compilation and analysis of content from 19 interviews with the researcher, carried out between 20 May 2011 to 7 October 2011, and later from 3 February 2012 to 25 May 2012. In the work’s Introduction the reader will find the full details and considerations of the research methodology applied in this study.

At the time of publication of the 1st Brazilian edition (2014), Vieira was still an intraphysical consciousness, and therefore, the verbal tense of the text’s narrative is in the present indicative. Vieira died on July 2, 2015, in Foz do Iguaçu, PR, Brazil, after experiencing a cerebrovascular accident (CVA) in the brainstem.

I wish to thank the helpful contribution of volunteers Maria Helena Balthazar, Rui Ferreira and Sergio Fernandes, responsible for the English language translation, and Igor Cabral, Jeffrey Lloyd, Juliana Nicolau and Ana Firmato, responsible for the revision.

The author

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

I wish to express here my gratitude to the consciousnesses that helped me in the elaboration of this book.

Firstly, my sincere thanks to my friend Paulo Andre Norberto, who provided me with a lead role in this research, and supported me in every stage of the work.

To the researcher Waldo Vieira, a cosmoethical example of interassistantial renunciation expressed in his self-availability in sharing his consciential microuniverse and personal evolutionary trajectory, the principal objects of the analysis of this consciential gestation.

To my evolutionary duo, Flávio Buononato, for the companionship, support, and enriching suggestions. And to Amaury Pontieri, for his support in the research.

To the invaluable team of volunteer-researchers: Eduardo Azevedo, Juliana Medeiros, Karla Ulman, Melissa Wisnieski, Patricia Pialarissi, Renata Pialarissi and Stefani Sabetzki.

To Cristiane Ferraro, John Paulo Costa and Julio Almeida for their revisions, heterocriticisms, suggestions, and insights extracted from conversations with this researcher.

To conscientiologists Djalma Fonseca, for his technical advice as a researcher of the School of Salerno, Laurentino Afonso in the areas of Etymology, Ancient History and Bibliology, and Laura Sanchez in the field of translation.

To researchers Alexandre Nonato, Dulce Daou, Luciana Ribeiro and Marina Thomaz for their timely contributions.

To Ruth Rocha, Sonia Siqueira Paranhos, Jarbas Paranhos, Nara Oliveira, Everton Santos, William Kunz and Selma Prata for providing bio­graphical data and photographic material of Waldo Vieira.

To the volunteers of Editares, in particular, the expert revisers Eroti­des Louly, Helena Araújo and Ninarosa Manfroi, and Sandra Tornieri, the publisher responsible for producing this work.

To the book cover artist Luciano Melo, for the excellent work. To the team at Epígrafe, especially Ernani Brito, Rosemary Salles and Daniel Serzanink.

And, finally, a special thanks to the extraphysical helpers, for their tireless support and opportune inspirations.

INTRODUCTION

The book Zephyrus: The Intermissive Paraidentity of Waldo Vieira aims to present and analyse the evolutionary trajectory of the researcher Waldo Vieira (1932 - 2014), medical doctor, odontologist, lexicographer and proposer of the sciences conscientiology and projectiology, con­sidering his retrolives and intermissive periods, like a brief multiexistential biography. The launching point of the analysis is the consciex known by the sobriquet Zephyrus, the designation by which Vieira has been recognized in the extraphysical dimensions since Antiquity.

The invitation to work on this project came to me in 2011 through the conscientiologist friend Paulo André Norberto, who at that time was interested in gathering historical material about specific nuances of Vieira.

Among the various research possibilities mooted at the time, was the study of the consciex named Zephyrus, Vieira’s intermissive extra identity or paraidentity, due to the originality and uniqueness of this theme in the intraphysical dimension, after it was publicly proposed by him in November 2008.

After Vieira’s consent on such task, Norberto started to address the work, inviting me to assume the leadership of the research, which resulted in the present publication.

Despite not hesitating to accept the proposal, I experienced an ambiguous satisfaction in that moment.

On the one hand, I felt motivated to investigate aspects of the evolutionary, multiexistential, multidimensional trajectory of the consciousness responsible for the intraphysical gathering intermissivists engaged in the development of the science conscientiology, one who received, in this current human life, the name Waldo Vieira.

That is, to research Zephyrus’ holobiography would allow me a better understanding regarding the traits, temperament, principles held and the trajectory travelled by this consciousness until now.

More than that, through the study of Zephyrus as a guinea-pig, I would have the opportunity to enter the extraphysical backstage of Evolutiology, comprehending some of the orienting pillars of the Interassistantial Multidimensional Maximechanism, in which he lucidly participates.

On the other hand, I immediately glimpsed some challenges. Firstly, this would be the first work published in the genre of holobiographic research, embracing the past lives and intermissive periods of the protagonist, and therefore, without methodological precedence or references capable to serve as support or orientation.

Several questions came to my mind: Which methods would I use to compile Zephyrus’ retroexperiences? Which criteria would I apply to define the structure and contents of the book? How would I elaborate an intelligible and didactical text, taking into account the different consciential states (intraphysical, extraphysical and projected), epochs and retrosomas experienced by the central character throughout the work?

This is the way I found to solve such research doubts.

Vieira’s retrocognitions or self-biographic holomemory constituted the main source of data for this research. To gather such information, Conscientiology researchers and I held 19 interviews with the researcher, in the period from 20 May 2011 to 7 October 2011, and later on, from 3 February 2012 to 5 May 2012, all of them filmed, resulting in 41 hours and 49 minutes of recordings.

Encounters were fortnightly, on Fridays, in the Tertuliarium at the Center of Higher Studies of Conscientiology (CEAEC), in Foz do Iguaçu, PR. Later on, the recording’s contents were transcribed by a team of conscientiological volunteers, allowing the detailed study of the subject and later elaboration of the book.

Other data related to Zephyrus was derived from conscientio­logical tertulias and minitertulias delivered by Vieira at CEAEC, and also from some rare bibliographical sources, mainly from the Spiritist area.

Historiographical research substantiated the socio, political, cultural and political context of the biographed’s retrolives. Data from the present existence together with interviews from Vieira and access to some of his personal documents through a couple, researchers Nara Oliveira and Everton Santos.

Through a judicious analysis of the material gathered, I chose the subjects considered as the base for the comprehension of the guinea-pig personality, taking into consideration 2 aspects: (1) the objective of highlighting the protagonist, amongst the whirl of experiences narrated, and (2) the consistence of Vieira’s retrocognitive content, discarding vague and unspecific memories. The structure of the work was born from there.

In the first section, Seriexiology, I opted to attend to 4 principle propositions, namely: (1) to present the subject in itself, demarking the Zephyrus-Vieira connection; (2) to conceptualize the neoverpon intermissive paraidentity, explicitly noting Zephyrus’ case study, the book’s primary research objective; (3) to emphasize, among the retrolives remembered and divulged by Vieira, those more remarkable and priority that had decisive holokarmic repercussions in his Personal Evolutionary Register (PER); and, finally, (4) to present a short biography of the researcher, the current resoma of Zephyrus. Whenever possible, I sought to describe such facts and parafacts with a certain chronological continuity, in order to give meaning and order to dispersed retrocognitive information.

In the second section, Intermissiology, I approached some experiences of the consciex Zephyrus, mainly related to his last 2 intermissive periods, prioritizing the parafacts capable of clarifying his evolutionary role within the context of the reurbex, and particularly, in the extra­physical rapproachment of consciexes committed to activities related to the science conscientiology.

In the third part of this work, Profilology, I sought to analyse the protagonist’s consciential profile, through two specialties, namely: para-sociometry and conscientiometry.

In chapter Paracastology: The Circle of Extraphysical Friendships, I describe the set of more active and public helper consciexes involved in the activities developed by the researcher and intermissivists at Cognopolis Foz do Iguaçu, today, and whose roots, in most cases, are tracable back to Zephyrus’ past.

From the analysis of the quality of parabonds established and para-friendships cultivated until now, it is possible for us to comprehend a little more about Zephyrus’ sense of the priority, mainly regarding his choices related to social and parasocial conviviality.

In the chapter Zephyrus from a Conscientiometric Perspective I present traits and consciential attributes I consider fundamental in the structure of the personality of this consciousness. This gives rise, through observation and hypothetic inferences, to vestiges of his possible level of conscientiality and place in the Evolutionary Scale of Consciousnesses.

Beyond this, in the biographical narrative’s game of evolutionary mirrors, dissecting the attributes of a certain guinea-pig allows the reader to compare the biographed with themselves. This is according to the presupposition that biographies suggest that which is universal embedded in the particularities of a determined subject. Through biographies one sees general human nature, certain particular individuals and, ultimately, one’s own individuality (Vilas Boas, 2002).

Thus, throughout the entire work, and mainly in this section of the book, it is possible for the reader to seek in Zephyrus’ profile self-identifying aspects, and also possible absent traits (absentraits), that is, strongtraits to be developed in the seriexiological future.

Finally, in Prospectivology: The Reurbex on the African Continent, I present some hypotheses regarding Zephyrus’ and the conscientiological intermissivists group’s future, before ending the work in the Chapter Final Considerations.

In this gescon it was necessary to describe the consciex in different consciential states and epochs. To facilitate the reader’s comprehension regarding the chronemic and proxemic context of the narrative presented, I opted to refer to Zephyrus, when necessary, using 4 expressions:

1. Zephyrus. Relates to the consciousness in itself, independent on the dimension or stage of the narratives in which it appears.

2. Consciex Zephyrus. Relates to the period in which Zephyrus was in some of his intermissive periods, in the extraphysical dimension.

3. Conscin Zephyrus or resomated Zephyrus. Relates to a retrolife of Zephyrus, in which we do not know the name used by him.

4. Waldo Vieira or simply Vieira. In relation to Zephyrus’ current resoma.

All research presents some level of intrinsic limitation due to the methodological process itself. In this work 3 research limitations are highlighted, for example:

1. Memoriology. The priority source of information reported stems from Vieira’s retrocognitive contents. Thus, possible inexactness and mnemonic gaps permeate the text, mainly in relation to dates and the chronological timeline of the retrofacts recalled by the researcher and portrayed here.

Moreover, the retrocognitive memory, despite in certain cases providing the possibility to relive the past act in its full completeness, also passes through the process where the past experiences are remade, rebuilt and rethought, based on current ideas. No matter how authentic the remembering of a certain retrofact may be, the perception and interpretation of that very same occurrence, today, differ from the original, because individuals evolve, naturally recycling the way they face the self-experiences.

It is also important to highlight the reseracher’s natural retrocognitive gaps regarding self-retroexperiences, allowing me to narrate only a portion of his evolutionary journey.

2. Historical record. It was not always possible to form a comparison between the researcher’s retrolives and the socio-economic-politi­cal-cultural environment of the epoch remembered, due to a lack of historic records, mainly from the most remote periods. In addition to that the fact that a large part of the research narrates the protagonist’s paraexperiences, naturally making a factual counterpoint impossible.

3. Interpretation. Every biographic text portrays the biographed through the biographer’s eyes (Vilas Boas, 2002). Even if the latter follows rigorous scientific methodology in reporting the character, basing the narrative on a vast range of documented material, historic writing, and consequently, the biographies, become truths interpreted by the author, because they in themselves carry the impressions, values, visions of world and the cognitive level of who wrote them (Vilas Boas, 2002). Scientific neutrality is a utopia.

In this research I sought to support myself, prioritarily, on Vieira’s narratives, in order to maintain a constant source. However, at no time, did I wish to sustain the dream of scientific impartiality, so well preconized by certain materialistic researchers.

In this way, when constructing the text, I did not disconsider the self-cognition accumulated regarding the science conscientiology, derived from more than two decades of conscientiological volunteering, teaching and research.

Nor did I discard my considerations regarding the biographed, gathered over these same two decades, and more intensely since 2003, when I moved residence to the city of Foz do Iguaçu and started to have daily contact with him during activities developed at the CEAEC campus.

Thus, in this book the reader should not expect the author’s total impartiality regarding the object of research, even because this would be something unfeasible from a methodological point of view.

Following the same line plotted by biographer Alexandre Nonato, in the work JK and the Backstage of the Construction of Brasilia (2010), my intent here was to be as sincere and as frank as possible regarding my personal positionings and opinions, freely expressing my points of view and illations in the contexts considered pertinent.

In certain passages, for example, I present conjectures and propose inferences regarding the subject discussed. The intent, often, was to evidence certain evolutionary presuppositions implicit in the text, which could, if I stuck to only describing the fact or parafact, pass unnoticed.

In other circumstances, my intention was to share questions and hypothesis regarding the subject exposed, leaving it evident, when necessary, personal research doubts, while at the same time, instigating the readers’ mentalsomas.

Despite this work primarily being a study case, the ideal is for a self-critical reader to hover over Vieira’s person, however, seeking from the example analyzed, possible theorical clarifying aids regarding the evolutionary process inherent to each and every consciousness.

The value of a guinea-pig conscin is based on the cosmoethical content brought. Human personalities pass. The examples remain.

The cosmoethical exercise of intelligent refutation lies with the researcher-readers of this book, in accordance with the application of the Principle of Disbelief:

DON’T BELIEVE IN ANYTHING, NOT EVEN THE IDEAS PRESENTED HERE. RESEARCH, REFLECT, REFUTE AND HAVE YOUR OWN EXPERIENCES.

Concluding, I hope the present work contributes to clarifying, at least, part of the extraphysical approaches of the conscientiological maxiproexis, helping in the recovery of cons of already resomated intermissivists and of those who will resomate in due course.

Section I

SERIEXIOLOGY

01. Presentation

In one of the hundreds out-of-body experiences had by Vieira during the 1980s, the researcher saw himself projected in the town square of his hometown, Monte Carmelo, in Minas Gerais. As usual, the role-based helper, a consciex known by the nickname Tao Mao, accompanied him during the unfolding of extracorporeal events.

In that para-environment the presence of various consciexes was observed, these former citizens of the region were reunited at this extraphysical event.

At first Vieira did not understand the reason for why he was there, nor for the warm welcome given by the consciexes. After all, not all those present were contemporaries from his present life, that is, some had lived in the region of Monte Carmelo prior to his resoma, in 1932. Others were already adults during his childhood. So, what would be the reason for such affability and friendliness from these consciousnesses?

The answer to that question came suddenly when the researcher realized that the invitation to the extraphysical meeting had not been addressed