Sie sind auf Seite 1von 4

Course: Summer Academic Practicum 2011

Evaluator: Dawn Bremner

Evaluatee: Jo Friesen


Mechanics of Test Administration Organization of Materials Adherence to Standardized Administration Rules & Appropriate Modifications Appropriate use of basal and ceiling rules Appropriate Querying Accurate Timing Procedures Fluidity of Administration (e.g., smooth transitions between subtests) Protocol: Accurate recording of responses Protocol: Accurate Scoring Rating

0 0

2 2

1 1 1

Comments Good Jo, you really did an excellent job, especially with MF. You understood that when Good Good Good Good Good Good

0 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 2

1 1 1 1 1

Clinical Skills Rapport and Attunement to Client (e.g., engaging the client; attentiveness to non-verbal behaviours) Qualitative Observations During Administration (e.g., rehearsal strategies, finger counting, inattentiveness, off-task behaviours)

1 2 3 4 5

1 2 3 4 5

Comments Great job. MF found some of the tasks to be quite difficult and he became quite frustrated. But you did a very good job of calming him down, motivating him between subtests by playing with him, and making his time here a positive experience for him. You did an excellent job of mentally noting different observations (as evident in the report you wrote), but try to include more observations in the protocol. This is

Professionalism Overall Assessment Performance

1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5

Good job.


Report Writing
Competency Appropriate and concise documentation of results. Appropriate subtest/task description Identification of strengths and areas in need of support Overall Professionalism Appropriate Length Person-Centered & Individualized Approach to Report Writing Mechanics of writing (spelling, grammar, punctuation, etc.) Rating

0 1.5 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 2

1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1

Comments A few places where things could have been said a little more concisely. Good You did a good job of balancing getting the message across that MF has significant difficulties while highlighting what he could do. Good Good Your report was very person-centered. You had a lot of examples and spoke about MF rather than the test. Well done! Good

Great job Jo. Overall report quality

1 2 3 4 5

Competency Attends group/team assessment activities Attends group/team meetings Is on time for group/team meetings Is prepared for group/team meetings Effectively participates in group/team meetings Readily accepts group/team assessment assignments Rating

0 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 2

1 1 1 1 1 1

Comments Yes all of them Yes all of them Yes all of them Yes all of them Yes. You had some really good insights and ideas about what further assessments to administer. You completed everything that was asked. I also really appreciated you looking over and fixing up another student's report when she was away and not being able to look at it on time. Those little things to help the team and client are very much appreciated. Yes. Your own and, as previously mentioned, you did one for another student. I also appreciated when you contacted me to make sure I didnt need anything else from you before you were going to be away from the computer for a few days. I really appreciated your feedback and input into the cognitive assessments. You would have been ready for the cognitive practicum, and I'm confident that you will be a strong member of any team next year.

Completes group/team assessment assignments

0 2

Overall Group Work Performance

1 2 3 4 5