THE DRAW

ROUND ZERO
IMPROMPTU

PROPOSITION M ONTENEGRO H UNGARY Q ATAR JAPAN BARBADOS C ZECH R EPUBLIC A RGENTINA S LOVAKIA

versus

OPPOSITION N IGERIA D ENMARK M ONGOLIA L EBANON B OSNIA AND H ERZEGOVINA S WEDEN B ERMUDA K UWAIT

ROUND ONE
T HIS HOUSE BELIEVES THAT IMPORTANT DECISIONS ABOUT CHILDREN S HEALTH SHOULD BE MADE BY MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS AND NOT BY THEIR PARENTS PROPOSITION N EW Z EALAND M ONGOLIA N ETHERLANDS S WEDEN I SRAEL C HINA M EXICO G ERMANY E NGLAND N IGERIA WALES B OSNIA AND H ERZEGOVINA versus OPPOSITION T URKEY M ALAYSIA U NITED S TATES P HILIPPINES B ERMUDA I NDIA D ENMARK AUSTRALIA C HILE BANGLADESH ROMANIA U NITED A RAB E MIRATES

ROUND ONE (cont. . . )

T HIS HOUSE BELIEVES THAT IMPORTANT DECISIONS ABOUT CHILDREN S HEALTH SHOULD BE MADE BY MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS AND NOT BY THEIR PARENTS PROPOSITION H ONG KONG C ZECH R EPUBLIC T HAILAND S WAZILAND G REECE H UNGARY KOREA Q ATAR I RELAND A RGENTINA E STONIA L ITHUANIA K UWAIT L EBANON versus OPPOSITION S LOVAKIA S OUTH A FRICA JAPAN S INGAPORE I NDONESIA S LOVENIA P ERU PAKISTAN BARBADOS S COTLAND M ONTENEGRO C ANADA
BYE

BYE

ROUND TWO
IMPROMPTU

PROPOSITION S INGAPORE L EBANON S OUTH A FRICA K UWAIT U NITED A RAB E MIRATES ROMANIA BANGLADESH C HILE C ANADA M ONTENEGRO S COTLAND BARBADOS

versus

OPPOSITION T HAILAND S WAZILAND H ONG KONG C ZECH R EPUBLIC WALES B OSNIA AND H ERZEGOVINA E NGLAND N IGERIA E STONIA L ITHUANIA I RELAND A RGENTINA

ROUND TWO (cont. . . )

IMPROMPTU

PROPOSITION PAKISTAN P ERU S LOVENIA I NDONESIA AUSTRALIA D ENMARK I NDIA B ERMUDA P HILIPPINES U NITED S TATES M ALAYSIA T URKEY S WEDEN M ONGOLIA

versus

OPPOSITION KOREA Q ATAR G REECE H UNGARY M EXICO G ERMANY I SRAEL C HINA N ETHERLANDS S LOVAKIA N EW Z EALAND JAPAN
BYE

BYE

ROUND THREE
T HIS HOUSE SUPPORTS GREATER US MILITARY PRESENCE IN E AST A SIA PROPOSITION C ANADA JAPAN S COTLAND S LOVAKIA PAKISTAN P ERU S LOVENIA I NDONESIA AUSTRALIA D ENMARK I NDIA B ERMUDA versus OPPOSITION H ONG KONG C ZECH R EPUBLIC T HAILAND S WAZILAND E NGLAND N IGERIA WALES B OSNIA AND H ERZEGOVINA U NITED A RAB E MIRATES ROMANIA BANGLADESH C HILE

ROUND THREE (cont. . . )

T HIS HOUSE SUPPORTS GREATER US MILITARY PRESENCE IN E AST A SIA PROPOSITION P HILIPPINES U NITED S TATES M ALAYSIA T URKEY G REECE H UNGARY KOREA Q ATAR I RELAND A RGENTINA E STONIA L ITHUANIA BARBADOS M ONTENEGRO versus OPPOSITION S INGAPORE L EBANON S OUTH A FRICA K UWAIT I SRAEL C HINA M EXICO G ERMANY N EW Z EALAND M ONGOLIA N ETHERLANDS S WEDEN
BYE

BYE

ROUND FOUR
IMPROMPTU MOTION

PROPOSITION S INGAPORE L EBANON S OUTH A FRICA K UWAIT U NITED A RAB E MIRATES ROMANIA BANGLADESH C HILE N EW Z EALAND M ONGOLIA N ETHERLANDS S WEDEN

versus

OPPOSITION U NITED S TATES P HILIPPINES T URKEY M ALAYSIA JAPAN AUSTRALIA S LOVAKIA I NDIA A RGENTINA I RELAND L ITHUANIA E STONIA

ROUND FOUR (cont. . . )

IMPROMPTU MOTION

PROPOSITION I SRAEL C HINA M EXICO G ERMANY E NGLAND N IGERIA WALES B OSNIA AND H ERZEGOVINA H ONG KONG C ZECH R EPUBLIC T HAILAND S WAZILAND B ERMUDA D ENMARK

versus

OPPOSITION H UNGARY G REECE Q ATAR KOREA P ERU PAKISTAN I NDONESIA S LOVENIA M ONTENEGRO C ANADA BARBADOS S COTLAND
BYE

BYE

ROUND FIVE
T HIS HOUSE WOULD CEASE THE EXPLOITATION OF RESOURCES IN THE A RCTIC REGION PROPOSITION S INGAPORE L EBANON S OUTH A FRICA K UWAIT U NITED A RAB E MIRATES ROMANIA BANGLADESH C HILE N EW Z EALAND M ONGOLIA N ETHERLANDS S WEDEN versus OPPOSITION S COTLAND BARBADOS C ANADA M ONTENEGRO S LOVENIA I NDONESIA PAKISTAN P ERU WALES S LOVAKIA E NGLAND JAPAN

ROUND FIVE (cont. . . )

T HIS HOUSE WOULD CEASE THE EXPLOITATION OF RESOURCES IN THE A RCTIC REGION PROPOSITION I SRAEL C HINA M EXICO G ERMANY AUSTRALIA D ENMARK I NDIA B ERMUDA P HILIPPINES U NITED S TATES M ALAYSIA T URKEY B OSNIA AND H ERZEGOVINA N IGERIA versus OPPOSITION T HAILAND S WAZILAND H ONG KONG C ZECH R EPUBLIC KOREA Q ATAR G REECE H UNGARY E STONIA L ITHUANIA I RELAND A RGENTINA
BYE

BYE

ROUND SIX
IMPROMPTU MOTION

PROPOSITION C ANADA M ONTENEGRO S COTLAND BARBADOS PAKISTAN P ERU S LOVENIA I NDONESIA E NGLAND N IGERIA WALES B OSNIA AND H ERZEGOVINA S LOVAKIA

versus

OPPOSITION K UWAIT S OUTH A FRICA L EBANON S INGAPORE C HILE BANGLADESH ROMANIA U NITED A RAB E MIRATES S WEDEN N ETHERLANDS M ONGOLIA M ALAYSIA N EW Z EALAND

ROUND SIX (cont. . . )

IMPROMPTU MOTION

PROPOSITION H ONG KONG C ZECH R EPUBLIC T HAILAND S WAZILAND G REECE JAPAN KOREA Q ATAR I RELAND E STONIA L ITHUANIA A RGENTINA H UNGARY

versus

OPPOSITION G ERMANY M EXICO C HINA I SRAEL B ERMUDA I NDIA D ENMARK AUSTRALIA T URKEY U NITED S TATES P HILIPPINES
BYE

BYE

ROUND SEVEN
T HIS HOUSE SUPPORTS SOVEREIGN DEBT DEFAULT AS A LEGITIMATE ECONOMIC STRATEGY FOR COUNTRIES PROPOSITION S INGAPORE L EBANON S OUTH A FRICA K UWAIT U NITED A RAB E MIRATES ROMANIA BANGLADESH C HILE C ANADA M ONTENEGRO S COTLAND BARBADOS versus OPPOSITION M ONGOLIA N EW Z EALAND S WEDEN N ETHERLANDS C HINA I SRAEL G ERMANY M EXICO D ENMARK AUSTRALIA B ERMUDA I NDIA

ROUND SEVEN (cont. . . )

T HIS HOUSE SUPPORTS SOVEREIGN DEBT DEFAULT AS A LEGITIMATE ECONOMIC STRATEGY FOR COUNTRIES PROPOSITION PAKISTAN P ERU S LOVENIA I NDONESIA E NGLAND N IGERIA WALES B OSNIA AND H ERZEGOVINA H ONG KONG S LOVAKIA T HAILAND S WAZILAND C ZECH R EPUBLIC JAPAN versus OPPOSITION U NITED S TATES P HILIPPINES T URKEY M ALAYSIA H UNGARY G REECE Q ATAR KOREA A RGENTINA I RELAND L ITHUANIA E STONIA
BYE

BYE

ROUND EIGHT
IMPROMPTU MOTION

PROPOSITION N EW Z EALAND M ONGOLIA N ETHERLANDS S WEDEN I SRAEL C HINA M EXICO G ERMANY AUSTRALIA D ENMARK I NDIA B ERMUDA

versus

OPPOSITION S INGAPORE L EBANON S OUTH A FRICA K UWAIT U NITED A RAB E MIRATES ROMANIA BANGLADESH C HILE C ANADA M ONTENEGRO S COTLAND BARBADOS

ROUND EIGHT (cont. . . )

IMPROMPTU MOTION

PROPOSITION P HILIPPINES U NITED S TATES M ALAYSIA T URKEY G REECE H UNGARY KOREA JAPAN I RELAND A RGENTINA E STONIA L ITHUANIA S LOVAKIA Q ATAR

versus

OPPOSITION PAKISTAN P ERU S LOVENIA I NDONESIA E NGLAND N IGERIA WALES B OSNIA AND H ERZEGOVINA H ONG KONG C ZECH R EPUBLIC T HAILAND S WAZILAND
BYE

BYE

Beth James, Aaron Maniam and Simon Quinn, January 2013