4.1 b School Population By Level A. Early Childhood Care and Development Gross Enrolment Ratio.

(ECCD)

Table no. 4.9 shows the comparative Gross

Enrolment between male and female in early childhood development. The level of participation in last three (3) school years a total average of 13% or 87% of the 3-5 years old children are not enrolled in any Early Childhood Care Development (ECCD).

Table 4.9 Gross Enrolment Rate (GER) in ECCD

SCHOOL YEAR 2002-2003 2003- 2004 2004-2005 TOTAL 14.46 10.34 14.07 MALE 14.04 10.16 13.99 FEMALE 14.9 10.53 14.15

Source:DepEd, Toledo City Strategic Plan 2010

B.

Elementary
The gross enrolment rate in the elementary level is so ambiguous to

determine the exact school age population considering that it counts all the enrolments irrespective of the age bracket and the enrollees residency. A net enrolment rate provides a more precise measurement in terms of the extent of participation in primary education belonging to the official primary school age. It also gives a trend percentage for the last three (3) school years.

City of Toledo 88 Comprehensive Land Use Plan (CLUP)

Table 4.10 Gross Enrolment Rate in Elementary Level

SCHOOL YEAR

TOTAL

MALE

FEMALE

2002-2003 2003-2004 2004-2005

114.68 109.00 104.86

117.07 111.04 106.52

112.8 106.86 103.12

Source: DepEd, Toledo City Strategic Plan 2010

Table 4.11 Net Enrolment Rate in Elementary Level

SCHOOL YEAR

TOTAL

MALE

FEMALE

2002-2003 2003-2004 2004-2005

102.56 87.98 85.74

102.21 86.65 84.78

102.93 89.38 86.74

Source: DepEd, Toledo City Strategic Plan 2010

City of Toledo Comprehensive Land Use Plan(CLUP)

89

BASIC PERFORMANCE INDICATORS FOR THE LAST 5 YEARS

(ELEMENTARY)

SY 2002-2003

SY 2003-2004 0.83 2.54 2.94 3.39 5.88 4.13 94.31 63.84 60.07 89.21 588.32 91.28 1:37.55 1:37.44 62.40

SCHOOL YEAR SY 2004-2005 0.83 2.54 2.91 3.39 5.19 4.57 93.67 57.25 52.42 97.3 87.95 91.56 1:36.26 1:1 1:37 67.02

PARTICIPATION RATE TRANS-IN 0.48 BALIKARALS 2.55 TRANS-OUT 1.34 REPEATERS 3.88 DROPOUTS 6.7 FAILURES 2.87 TRANSITION 95.73 COHORT SURVIVAL 65.09 COMPLETION 60.37 RETENTION 91.12 PROMOTION 88.10 GRADUATION 92.37 TEACHER-PUPIL RATIO 1:39 CLASS-CLASSROOM RATIO CLASSROOM-PUPIL RATIO NAT'L. ACHIEVEMENT TEST Note: Some Classrooms Needs Minor Repair

SY 2005-2006 81.46 1.93 1.82 2.46 5.51 4.33 3.92 96.04 60.98 56.98 89.39 90.05 93.45 1:36.26 1:1 1:37 59.80

SY 2006-2007 0.83 2.54 1.47 3.39 4.43 3.88 95.61 60.37 59.09 90.51 88.98 92.84 1:36:24 1:1 1:37 65.02

C.

Secondary
The average gross enrolment rate in the secondary level is 71.33 for

the last three(3) school years. An information on gender parity is provided in Table 4.1b4 which shows that the index favored most for female student. The net enrolment rate in Table 4.13 provides information that enrolment in both and female kept on decreasing and in comparison to gender parity, the index is favored to female but still then, it is too low as to the expectation turned out of participation of the school going age population.

City of Toledo Comprehensive Land Use Plan(CLUP)

90

Table 4.12 Gross Enrolment Rate in Secondary Level

SCHOOL YEAR 2002-2003 2003-2004 2004-2005

TOTAL 75.21 75.58 63.19

MALE 72.29 73.12 57.84

FEMALE 78.18 78.09 68.63

Source: DepEd, Toledo City Strategic Plan 2010

Table 4.13 Net Enrolment Rate in Secondary Level SCHOOL YEAR 2002-2003 2003-2004 2004-2005 TOTAL 51.70 52.56 41.55 MALE 46.57 47.98 34.65 FEMALE 56.91 57.23 48.58

Source: DepEd, Toledo City Strategic Plan 2010

4.1 c Drop-Out Rate A. Elementary

Table 4.14 gives the Simple Dropout Rate where it calculates the percentage of pupils who do not finish a particular grade level. It does not include pupils who finish a grade level but fail to enroll in the next grade level the following school year. On gender parity, the index favored most on the female side but has a minimal percentage compared to the male.

Table 4.14 AVERAGE SIMPLE DROPOUT RATE-ELEMENTARY SCHOOL YEAR 2002-2003 2003-2004 2004-2005 TOTAL 4.37 6.55 5.98 MALE 5.23 8.26 7.31 FEMALE 3.45 4.64 4.50

Source: DepEd , Toledo City Strategic Plan 2010

City of Toledo Comprehensive Land Use Plan(CLUP)

91

B.

Secondary
The Average Simple Dropout Rate determines the percentage of

students who do not finish a particular year level. The gender parity index still favor the female students with an average of 4.83% compared to the male students who has an average of 10.14% for the last three (3) school years as shown in Table 4.15.

Table 4.15 AVERAGE SIMPLE DROPOUT RATE-SECONDARY SCHOOL YEAR TOTAL 2002-2003 7.58 2003-2004 7.30 2004-2005 7.48 Source: DepEd, Toledo City Strategic Plan MALE 10.74 10.08 9.59 2010 FEMALE 4.52 4.61 5.37

4.1 d Number of Teachers and Number of Students

As of the school year 2006, The Toledo City Division has 680 public elementary school teachers and 276 public secondary school teachers. With this figure, the Student-Teacher Ratio is 32:1 where the resulting proportion means that there is one teacher available for every 32 pupils. On the secondary level, the Student-Teacher Ratio is 37:1 or one teacher is available for every 37 pupils. Extracting and in tracking the data per se with the corresponding data on enrolment for the last three (3) school years, gives us the information that the Toledo City Division do not have a problem on teachers-pupils ratio.

City of Toledo Comprehensive Land Use Plan(CLUP)

92

School a. Elementary Apid ES Awihao ES Bagakay ES Bato ES Biga ES Biga ES - Makatol PS (Annex) Bulongan ES Bunga ES Buswang ES Calibasan ES Calongcalong ES Cambang-ug ES Canlumampao ES Cantabaco ES Captain Claudio ES Carmen ES Don Andres Soriano ES Dumlog PS Fulgencio Dolino ES Gen. P. Del Rosario ES Himatugan ES Ibo ES Ilihan ES Landahan ES Loay ES Lower Campo 8 ES Lower Tubod ES Luas ES Lubo ES Magdugo ES Mainggit ES Malubog ES Matab-ang ES Media Once ES Minolos ES New Bucao ES North City Central ES Old Bucao ES Pandongbato ES Pangamihan ES Poog ES Putingbato ES Sagay ES Sam-ang ES Sangi PS South City Central ES Subayon ES Talavera ES Tongkay ES Upper Campo 8 ES TOTAL

Table 4.16 Pupil - Teacher and Pupil - Classroom Toledo City SCHOOL YEAR 2006 - 2007 Number of Pupil-Teacher Enrolment Teachers Ratio 551 659 354 1,237 397 141 409 496 183 134 228 210 451 912 565 740 1,290 168 475 1,278 115 468 340 283 148 282 454 185 180 958 865 522 1,017 678 355 173 1,522 608 374 257 679 112 310 185 93 1,547 177 700 148 28 24,641 13 21 9 37 9 3 9 14 6 4 6 6 13 25 16 22 37 3 15 41 4 13 12 8 4 7 13 4 5 26 20 14 25 19 8 5 38 14 10 7 16 4 9 6 2 44 7 21 4 1 679 42.38:1 31.38:1 39.33:1 33.43:1 44.11:1 47.00:1 45.44:1 35.43:1 30.50:1 33.50:1 38.00:1 35.00:1 34.69:1 36.48:1 35.31:1 33.64:1 34.86:1 56.00:1 31.67:1 31.17:1 28.75:1 36.00:1 28.33:1 35.38:1 37.00:1 40.29:1 34.92:1 46.25:1 36.00:1 36.85:1 43.25:1 37.29:1 40.68:1 35.68:1 44.38:1 34.60:1 40.05:1 43.43:1 37.40:1 36.71:1 42.44:1 28.00:1 34.44:1 30.83:1 46.50:1 35.16:1 25.29:1 33.33:1 37.00:1 28.00:1 36.29:1

Number of Classrooms 11 24 10 34 11 3 9 13 6 6 6 6 12 26 14 23 39 3 16 37 4 13 12 7 5 7 12 5 6 21 19 14 26 19 8 4 38 14 10 6 17 4 9 6 3 40 6 19 5 6 674

Pupil-Classroom Ratio 50.09:1 27.46:1 35.40:1 36.38:1 36.09:1 47.00:1 45.44:1 38.15:1 30.50:1 22.33:1 38.00:1 35.00:1 37.58:1 35.08:1 40.36:1 32.17:1 33.08:1 56.00:1 29.69:1 34.54:1 28.75:1 36.00:1 28.33:1 40.43:1 29.60:1 40.29:1 37.83:1 37.00:1 30.00:1 45.62:1 45.53:1 37.29:1 39.12:1 35.68:1 44.38:1 43.25:1 40.05:1 43.43:1 37.40:1 42.83:1 39.94:1 28.00:1 34.44:1 30.83:1 31.00:1 38.68:1 29.50:1 36.84:1 29.60:1 4.67:1 35.56:1

City of Toledo Comprehensive Land Use Plan(CLUP)

93

Table 4.17

City of Toledo Comprehensive Land Use Plan(CLUP)

94

Pupil - Teacher and Pupil - Classroom Toledo City SCHOOL YEAR 2006 - 2007
School b. Secondary Awihao NHS Bato NHS Bunga NHS Cantabaco NHS Don Andres Soriano NHS General Climaco NHS Luray II BHS Day & Night Magdugo NHS Matab-ang NHS Media Once NHS Toledo National Vocational HS Toledo Science NHS Enrolment Number of Teachers Pupil-Teacher Ratio Number of Classrooms Pupil-Classroom Ratio

Total

645 1,158 171 535 1,983 691 1,466 1,036 1,130 433 848 157 10,253

80 34 16 32 26 4 15 13 14 22 20 276

24.79:1 24.94:1 33.44:1 36.19:1 39.85:1 42.75:1 43.00:1 45.38:1 49.36:1 51.36:1 73.30:1 37.15:1

16 21 6 13 43 10 6 20 20 11 33 5 204

40.31:1 55.14:1 28.50:1 41.15:1 46.12:1 69.10:1 244.33:1 51.80:1 56.50:1 39.36:1 25.70:1 31.40:1 50.26:1

Source: Planning Unit DepEd Toledo City

4.1 e Adequacy

of Teacher/Classroom Facilities

One of the factors that contribute to the low performance in the development of learning outcomes is associated with the condition of the classroom facilities.

Lack of classrooms, substandard , dilapidated and needs repair classrooms and lack of school furniture which include desks, armchairs, sets of tables and chairs, is one of the issues that needs to be resolved for the next five (5) school years. The

Division foresees that by year 2010 a classroom-pupil ratio of 1:35 in the first 3 grade levels and a 1:40 classroom-student ratio for grade 4 to fourth year shall be attained.

City of Toledo Comprehensive Land Use Plan(CLUP)

95

Table 4.18 CLASSROOM REQUIREMENTS

BASELINE PUBLIC ELEMENTARY
SY 2005 - 2006 SY 2006 - 2007 SY 2007 - 2008

PROJECTED
SY 2008 - 2009 SY 2009 - 2010

Enrolment Number of Existing Cl. Cl. - Pupil Ratio No. of Cl. Needed

24,568 668 36.78

24,641 674 36.56

25,000 700 35.71 10

25,500 700 36.43 10

26,000 700 37.14 10

Remarks

1. Classroom needs is a school based assessment analysis. 2. Priotization of the construction of classrooms/school buildings shall be based on the DEPED Rainbow Spectrum. 3. Some classrooms need minor repair. 4. Some classrooms need to be condemned.

Table 4.19 CLASSROOM REQUIREMENTS

PUBLIC SECONDARY BASELINE
SY 2005 - 2006 SY 2006 - 2007 SY 2007 - 2008

PROJECTED
SY 2008 - 2009 SY 2009 - 2010

Enrolment Number of Existing Cl. Cl. - Pupil Ratio No. of Cl. Needed

9,898 204 48.52

10,253 204 50.26

11,000 210 52.38 34

11,500 244 47.13 15

12,000 259 46.33 7

Remarks

1. Classroom needs is a school based assessment analysis. 2. Priotization of the construction of classrooms/school buildings shall be based on the DEPED Rainbow Spectrum. 3. Some classrooms need minor repair. 4. Some classrooms need to be condemned.

NOTE: DEPED Standard Deviation is used in the computation which is 45 pupils/students per classroom.

City of Toledo Comprehensive Land Use Plan(CLUP)

96

1. Current Number of Enrolment, Teachers & Classes by Grade/ Year Level

ELEMENTARY
DISTRICT GRADE 1 E T C E GRADE 2 T C E GRADE 3 T C E GRADE 4 T C E GRADE 5 T C E GRADE 6 T C E TOTAL T C

EAST

1493

36

39

1053

24

28

1014

23

26

912

20

25

871

22

24

773

31

25

6116

157

167

NORTH

2040

45

48

1441

35

39

1272

31

32

1208

27

33

1174

31

32

1033

41

32

8168

210

216

SOUTH

986

23

24

869

20

20

755

19

19

766

17

18

745

17

18

659

34

19

4780

131

118

WEST

1420

32

33

1117

27

27

1160

27

27

995

24

26

968

22

23

966

38

24

6626

172

160

TOTAL

5939

136

144

4480

106

114

4201

100

104

3881

88

102

3758

92

97

3431

144

100

2569 0

670

661

Legend: E - enrolment T - teacher C - classes

City of Toledo Comprehensive Land Use Plan(CLUP)

97

SECONDARY
SECONDARY 1. Awihao NHS 2. Bato NHS 3. Bunga NHS 4. Cantabaco NHS 5. DAS NHS 6. Gen. Climaco NHS 7. Luray II Day NHS 8. Luray II Night NHS 9. Magdugo NHS 10. Matab-ang NHS 11. Media Once NHS 12. Toledo Science 13. TNVS TOTAL E 171 427 55 146 540 218 311 258 266 361 134 48 307 3242 First Year T 3 7 0 4 10 3 4 3 6 7 3 1 6 57 C 4 9 1 4 10 5 4 3 6 7 3 1 6 63 E 157 314 49 138 551 197 280 220 258 283 105 27 225 2804 Second Year T 3 5 0 3 9 3 3 3 5 5 2 1 5 47 52 C 3 6 1 3 10 5 3 3 5 2 1 5 E 165 293 33 123 536 193 276 217 198 311 88 30 168 2631 Third Year T 4 4 0 3 9 3 3 3 4 5 2 1 4 45 C 4 6 1 3 10 4 3 3 4 6 2 1 4 51 E 179 292 43 115 560 201 241 145 261 217 81 30 194 2559 Fourth Year T 9 15 4 6 31 6 8 6 13 10 7 4 21 51 C 4 6 1 3 10 4 3 2 5 5 2 1 4 49 E 672 1326 180 522 2187 809 1108 840 983 1172 408 135 894 11236 TOTAL T 19 31 4 16 59 15 18 15 28 27 14 7 36 49 C 15 27 4 12 40 18 13 11 20 23 9 4 19 215

City of Toledo Comprehensive Land Use Plan(CLUP)

98

2. Current and Projected Enrolment

Elementary School Year Gross Enrolment Male Female Total
baseline
2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 13,558 13,856 14,161 14,473 14,791 15,116 15,449 12,132 12,398 12,671 12,950 13,235 13,526 13,824 25,690 26,255 26,831 27,423 28,026 28,643 29,273

PROJECTED Total Age 6-11 Male Female

13,138 13182 13162 13071 12941 12784 12610 12,447 12465 12440 12368 12261 12134 11994

Total
25,585 25647 25602 25439 25202 24918 24604

Gross Participation Rate Male Female Total

103.20 105.11 107.59 110.73 114.30 118.24 122.51 97.47 99.46 101.86 104.71 107.94 111.47 115.26 100.41 102.37 104.80 107.80 111.21 114.95 118.98

City of Toledo Comprehensive Land Use Plan(CLUP)

99

Secondary School Year Male

baseline 2008-2009
2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015

Gross Enrolment Female Total

5679 5804 5932 6062 6196 6332 6471 11236 11483 11736 11994 12258 12528 12803

PROJECTED Total Age 6-11 Male Female

10050 10279 10490 10674 10823 10932 10996 9778 9944 10088 10208 10302 10367 10400

Total
19828 20223 20578 20882 21125 21299 21396

Gross Participation Rate Male Female Total

55.29 55.25 55.33 55.57 56.01 56.68 57.58 58.08 58.37 58.80 59.38 60.14 61.08 62.22 56.69 56.81 57.07 57.48 58.08 58.88 59.90

5557 5679 5804 5932 6062 6196 6332

The table presentation of the projected enrolment in the public elementary and secondary schools provide us the information that we have a great turn-out in terms of participation in the elementary level but totally opposite to the data presented in the secondary which has a low participation profile of school going age population. This may attribute to low economic growth in the locality that leads to lackluster of parents in sending their children to school and instead have them involve in early child labor practices to help them of their family daily needs. For this purpose, programs & projects which focus on school going age population shall be given priority. The likes of; Early Intervention and Counseling of Students at Risk, Oplan Balik Eskwlea, Parents Teachers Community Partnership, Recovery Program for Absentee Students and others alike are more likely be the turning point of success.

City of Toledo Comprehensive Land Use Plan(CLUP)

100

3.

Comparative Analysis in Enrolment for the Last Five Years

Elementary
DepEd Toledo City Division Com parative Analysis in Enrolm ent for the Last Five years (Fem ale) Public Elem entary

DepEd Toledo City Division Com parative Analysis in Enrolm ent for the Last Five Year (Male) Public Elem entary 13800 13600 13400 12200

12142

13554
12100

12136

13201
13200 13000 12800 12600

12000

11982

12900 12771

11900

12842
11800 11797 11799

11700 12400 12200 11600

041 05

05062 3 06 07 SCHOOL YEAR

074 08

085 09

041 05

0506072 3 4 06 07 08 SCHOOL YEAR

085 09

Graph no. 1

Graph no. 2

The thrust towards participation of full cycle in basic education with satisfactory achievement is an effort of having a cost effective quality assurance standards under the universal EFA 2015 commitment. Graph no. 1 & 2 which shows the comparative analysis of enrolment for the last 5 years give us the information that there are more number of male enrolment compare to that of female. This data is limited only to the main gross participation which is totally different from the net intake in the enrolment that goes with the school going age population in a particular grade-age level.

City of Toledo Comprehensive Land Use Plan(CLUP)

101

Secondary
De pEd Tole do City Divis ion Com pa ra tive Ana lys is in Enr olm e nt for the La s t Five Ye a rs (M a le ) P ublic S e c onda ry
6000 5500 5000 4500 4000 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 1 0405 2 3 050606 07 SCHOOL YEAR 4 0708 5 0809 5163 4880 4754 4999

De p Ed T o le d o C ity Divis io n C o m parative A n alys is in En r o lm e n t fo r th e L as t Five Ye ar s (Fe m ale ) Pu b lic Se con d ar y 6000 5500 5000 4500 4000 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 1 0405 2 3 050606 07 SCHOOL YEAR 4 0708 5 0809 5443 5396 5144 5254

5557

5679

Graph no. 3

Graph no. 4

Graph no. 3 & 4 shows us the most critical issues in terms of participation of all going age population in the secondary. Considering that the current trend on enrolment as presented in the five years comparative analysis on enrolment and the actual & projected enrolment in the secondary shows a low gross participation in the public secondary with a rate of 55.29% for male and 58.08% for female or having a gross rate of 56.69% which is low beyond the national target of at least 75%.

4.1 f

DEVELOPMENT NEEDS 102

City of Toledo Comprehensive Land Use Plan(CLUP)

1. Strategies and Goals

In planning, DepEd, Toledo City Division always considers strategies, goals and objectives as the necessary tools to achieve the organizational excellence. Strategies employed into this endeavor are to (1) identify the facts that determine the current state of basic education in the city; (2) analyze the problems that affect effective and efficient delivery of the education services of the city; (3) identify the issues that need to be prioritized. Goals and Objectives are (1) to train teachers the to different achieve teaching above techniques to equip them in of their all profession, (2) average educational performance

pupils/students in all public schools in the National Achievement Test and other test/s alike by at least 85.00%, (3) minimize (if cannot be totally eliminated) the dropout rates by at least 1% for elementary and secondary, (4) maximize efforts to encourage all school going age populace to be in school (90%) and (5) institutionalize pre-school/kindergarten classes in the formal education.

City of Toledo Comprehensive Land Use Plan(CLUP)

103

Fig. 4.01 PROBLEM ANALYSIS SY 2005-2006 LOW PUPILS / STUDENT ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE

HIGH RATE OF ABSENTEEIS M

POOR TEACHERS TEACHING COMPETENCIES

INADEQUATE INSTRUCTION AL MATERIALS

INADEQUAT E PHYSICAL FACILITIES

Existen ce of Child Labor

Poor Health Conditi on

Too many Extra Curricular Activities

Lack of Instructional Supervision

Lack of Textbook s

Lack of TMs

Science & Lab Materials

Lack of Instructio nal Rooms

Lack of Laborator y Facilities

City of Toledo Comprehensive Land Use Plan(CLUP)

104

BASIC PERFORMANCE INDICATORS FOR THE LAST 5 YEARS SCHOOL YEAR

SY 20022003 SY 20032004 SY 20042005 SY20052006 SY 20062007

(ELEMENTARY)
PARTICIPATION RATE TRANS-IN BALIKARALS TRANS-OUT REPEATERS DROPOUTS FAILURES TRANSITION COHORT SURVIVAL COMPLETION RETENTION PROMOTION GRADUATION TEACHER-PUPIL RATIO CLASS-CLASSROOM RATIO CLASSROOM-PUPIL RATIO NAT'L. ACHIEVEMENT TEST

0.48 2.55 1.34 3.88 6.70 2.87 95.73 65.09 60.37 91.12 88.10 92.37 1:39

0.83 2.54 2.94 3.39 5.88 4.13 94.31 63.84 60.07 89.21 588.32 91.28 1:37.55

0.83 2.54 2.91 3.39 5.19 4.57 93.67 57.25 52.42 97.30 87.95 91.56 1:36.26 1:1

1.93 1.82 2.46 5.51 4.33 3.92 96.04 60.98 56.98 89.39 90.05 93.45 1.36.26 1:1 1:37 59.80

0.83 2.54 1.47 3.39 4.43 3.88 95.61 60.37 59.09 90.51 88.98 92.84 1:36:24 1:1 1:37 65.02

1:37.44 43.07 62.40

1:37 67.02

Note: Some Classrooms Need Minor Repair.

City of Toledo Comprehensive Land Use Plan(CLUP)

105

BASIC PERFORMANCE INDICATORS FOR THE LAST 5 YEARS (SECONDARY) SCHOOL YEAR
SY 20022003 SY 20032004 SY 20042005 SY20052006 SY 20062007

PARTICIPATION RATE TRANS-IN BALIKARALS TRANS-OUT REPEATERS DROPOUTS FAILURES TRANSITION COHORT SURVIVAL COMPLETION RETENTION PROMOTION GRADUATION TEACHER-PUPIL RATIO CLASS-CLASSROOM RATIO CLASSROOM-PUPIL RATIO ACHIEVEMENT TEST 49.03 0.8 2.89 1.99 4.95 8.04 0.94 97.23 62.6 62.1 80.75 99.19 87.53 0.64 2.11 1.22 2.80 7.50 4.66 87.98 68.77 64.93 87.31 87.29 90.78 40.02 1.47 1.72 0.83 2.44 7.27 5.72 78.69 66.63 60.7 94.56 87.74 91.10 1:36.52 1:1 1:52..05 58.25 1.68 1.94 0.71 3.90 6.13 5.08 111.44 60.18 56.45 77.07 88.42 94.84 1:35.86 1:1 1:52..05 56.84 2.83 1.74 0.59 3.81 5.50 3.90 90.07 64.96 56.05 90.83 79.32 83.12 1:36.10

City of Toledo Comprehensive Land Use Plan(CLUP)

106

Fig, 4.02 OBJECTIVE AND ALTERNATIVE ANALYASIS SY 2005-2006

IMPROVED PUPILS PERFORMANCE IN National Achievement Test FROM 67.02% TO 75.00% IN ELEMENTARY & FROM 58.25% TO 65.00% IN THE SECONDARY BY THE YEAR 2008

Minimized Pupils Absenteeism

Improved Teachers Teaching Competencies Improv ed health conditi on of pupils Seek assistanc e from local govt. unit

Provide Instructional Materials

Improve Learning Environment Improv ed classro om conditi on

Minimiz ed Child Labor

Conduc t INSET

Minimized teachers extra curricular activities

Provide Adequa te TX

Provide Adequate Science Equipme nt

Provide potable water

Provide adequate chalkboar d

Send letter to parent s

Conduc t home visitati on

Provide supplementar y feeding

Conduc t TNA

Tap SK for sports activiti es

Reques t for Addnl. TX

Request for the supply of Science Equipt. / materials

Construct deepwhe el / pipeline potable water

Request for additiona l chalkboar d

Repair / construct addtl. classroo ms

Conduc t PTCA meetin g

Guidan ce Counse ling

Provide hot soup

Solicits LGUs / NGOs for supply of medicine

Conduc t School based trainin g

Solicit LGU/NGO for SK honorariu m

Provide a ratio of 1:1 book per pupil per subject

Seek LGUs / NGOs financial assistanc e

Seek LGUs / NGOs financial assistanc e

Request Div. Physical Fac. Coor. & Supplu Officer to conduct ocular inspection

Request LGUs / NGOs for the repair / constructio n of classroom

City of Toledo Comprehensive Land Use Plan(CLUP)

107

SITUATIONAL ANALYSIS MATRIX SY 2005-2006

City of Toledo Comprehensive Land Use Plan(CLUP)

108

INTERNAL ASSESSMENT (What is the current situation in the School?) POSITIVE I. PUPIL ACHIEVEME NT
1. National Achievement Test Results shows improvement in SY 2004-2005 in the Division. Elementary 67.02% to 75.00% and Secondary from 51.10% to 58.25%

EXTERNAL ENVIRONMENT (What is the current situation outside of the school, which affects the School?) MATRIX - Parents (PTCA)
are wiling to send their children to school Barangay Officials are very cooperative for the development of the schools LGUs, NGOs and other private personalities are very cooperative in the development of the school. Some teachers do some home visitation to their pupils / students. Some NGOs made donations of classrooms Donations coming from the LGUs Some NGOs contributed/ga ve books to selected school/s. near Poverty Low Participation Rate Early Child Labor Practices Migration of parents due to work related cases. Existence of illegal gambling the school Existence of prohibited/illegal drugs Existence of gangs/fraternity Too many contributions / payments shouldered by the parents for the school maintenance / improvement.

STAKEHOLDER Achievement 1.1 Results of the National ANALYSIS Test still below from the National Standard which is 75%. 1.2 Lack of Instructional Materials 1.3 High Rate of Absenteeism 1.4 High Rate of Dropouts 1.5 Lack of Laboratory Equipments 1.6 Low Cohort Survival Rate 1.7 Low Completion Rate

NEGATIVE

II. TEACHER

1. Sufficient number of teachers

1.1 Lack of In Service Trainings 1.2 Lackluster of teachers in terms of commitment towards quality of output 1.3 Too many extra curricular activities 1.4 Lack of instructional supervision 1.1 Classrooms needs repair 1.2 Lack of Information Technology 1.3 Lack of Schools/Classrooms toilets 1.4 Lack of chalkboards 1.5 No electrical power supply/ventilation 1.6 No potable (drinking water supply

Private lending institutions luring teachers to make loan with them making them absent in their classes. Presence of unscrupulous personalities, I.e.; frats & gangs vandalizing the school, school intruders & others which results to robbery/stealing of school property & etc. Books given are not subject related or as prescribed by the curriculum standard.

III. PHYSICAL FACILITIES

1. Sufficient number of classrooms.

1. Presence of books 1.1 Insufficient number of books per IV. City of Toledo all subject areas 109 in grade/year per subject/learning areas CURRICULU Comprehensive Land Use Plan(CLUP) 1.2 Some delivered books are obsolete M Some subject books have different titles with the same grade level with different paging

SY 2005-2006 Who are the Stakehold ers? 1. PUPILS 2. PARENTS/PTCA How are they affected by the problems of the school? What is their capacity/motivation to participate in addressing the problems? Purely they are recipient Can influence the local through PTCA resolutions What is their relationship with other Stakeholders (e.g. partnership or conflict) Partnership officials Partnership Networking / Linkages /

Adversely affected Directly affected

3.
PRINCIPALS/TEACHER S

Directly affected

Can influence the local officials Partnership through linkages and or through Networking participation in all local activities. Can initiate/make funding educational development. for Partnership Networking

Linkages

4. LGU 5. NGO

Indirectly affected Indirectly affected

Linkages

Can contribute/assist the school/s Partnership through donation/s and or through Adopt a School - Program

City of Toledo Comprehensive Land Use Plan(CLUP)

110

PROPOSED FORMAT FOR THE STAKEHOLDER TABLE

A High Interest / Importance; High Influence

B High Interest / Importance; Low Influence

These stakeholders are the basis for an effective These stakeholders will require special initiative if their interest coalition of support for the school. are to be protected.

C low Interest / Importance; High Influence

D Low Interest / Importance; Low Influence; Low Influence

These stakeholders can influence the outcomes of These stakeholders are of least importance to the school. projects, but their priorities are not those of the school. They may be a risk or obstacle to the project.

City of Toledo Comprehensive Land Use Plan(CLUP)

111