DS-104 TASK FORCE

Agenda

Housekeeping
Selecting sites for further review Process

Geologic Overview EMF Review of sites Options for next meetings activities Wrap up

Site Tiers

Tier 1 Sites

Tier 2 Sites

Tier 3 Sites

Best sites as identified by the Task Force

Sites that could be considered only if none of Tier 1 is viable

Sites identified as not compatible with the community

To be presented at the Community Workshop

Step-by-Step

This week we are providing you detailed information on another 4 sites At the end of this meeting, the Task Force will decide if more sites should be reviewed at the next meeting in greater detail
Original list Task Force identified sites

Or, we can begin tiering

Limited Geologic Overview

Pacific Palisades
Proposed DS-104

Geologic Conditions to Consider

Existing

Potential

Landslides (Qls) Faulting Weak or Adverse Bedding Steep Slopes

Landslides from seismic shaking Liquefaction Faulting active and inactive

Basic Geologic Material Types

Fill and/or Soils Granular materials (i.e. clay, silt, sand and gravel). Artificial fill (af), Hydraulic fill (hf) Landslides Often are comprised of failures of weak bedrock materials. Younger or Historic Landslides (Qly), Older or Prehistoric Landslides (Qlo) Terrace Materials Consolidated clay, silt, sand and gravel. Terrace Deposits (Qt, Qtc, Qtm) Bedrock Primarily shale, siltstone and sandstone. Modelo Formation (Tm), Topanga Canyon Formation (Tti, Ttc, Tts), Tuna Canyon Formation (Kt)

Seismic Hazard Map Topanga Quadrangle

Green = Liquefaction Blue = Landslide

Seismic Hazard Map

Alquist-Priolo Active Fault Maps

Typical Mitigation Techniques

Setbacks from faults and slopes Caissons, deep foundations Retaining walls, debris walls Ground improvement Buttress fill

Landslides

Typical Landslide Features

Landslide Mitigation Method Utilizing Buttress Fill

Example of Landslide Mitigation Methods