2.

1 Snack Chips In this hedonic test, two different kinds of snack chips are used as the sample which are cassava chips and talas chips. There were 201 panelists who evaluated the sample by comparing these two different kinds of chips, in this case the panelist are asked to judge which one of the samples is better or preferable. In this experiment, the null hypothesis (H0) is there is no significant preference between cassava chips and talas chips. Meanwhile the alternative hypothesis (H1) is there is a significant preference between cassava chips and talas chips. H0 : cassava chips preference = talas chips preference H1 : cassava chips preference talas chips preference From the survey conducted, it showed that there were 168 panelists who prefer cassava chips while the rest of panelists which are 33 panelists chose talas chips as the better snack chips. The method used for data analysis is binomial test with probability 0.5 and using two tailed analysis. The result of analysis indicated that to be significantly different of better at 5% significant level, at least 125

panelists required or needed as the minimum repliers. Thus, it can be said that there is a significant difference or preference between cassava chips and talas chips at 5% significant level (Ho is rejected). In this case, the panelist could differentiate between two samples and they prefer cassava chips to talas chips.

Conclusion: From the experiment conducted, it can be cocluded that Ho is rejected or there is a significant difference between cassava chips and talas chips at 5% significant level as the panelists preferred cassava chips to talas chips.

APPENDIX n= 201 x=minimum number of repliers k ( < 0.05; two sided) = 0.98 x= 10 +

= 10 + (201 + 1)/2 + 0.98 = 124.89 = 125 minimum number of repliers