Sie sind auf Seite 1von 4

Journal of Dispersion Science and Technology, 30:328–331, 2009

Copyright # Taylor & Francis Group, LLC


ISSN: 0193-2691 print=1532-2351 online
DOI: 10.1080/01932690802540517

New Values of the Required Hydrophilic-Lipophilic


Balance for Oil in Water Emulsions of Solid Fatty Acids
and Alcohols Obtained from Solubility Parameter and
Dielectric Constant Values
Ricardo C. Pasquali, Carlos Bregni, and Melina P. Taurozzi
Departamento de Tecnologı́a Farmacéutica, Facultad de Farmacia y Bioquı́mica, Universidad de
Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina

The goals of this articles are to find a correlation between the required HLB values and the solu-
bility parameters of oils; find a more precise correlation between the required HLB values and the
dielectric constant, than the one obtained by other authors; and to determine the required HLB
values for o/w emulsions of solid fatty acids and alcohols from the values of the solubility para-
meters and dielectric constants, that could be more trustful than the ones obtained by the meth-
odology proposed by Griffin. It was obtained lineal relation between required HLB and solubility
parameter (r ¼ 0.995). Also it was observed lineal relations between required HLB and dielectric
constants or logarithm of the dielectric constant more precise than the one obtained by other
authors.
Keywords Dielectric constant, fatty acids, fatty alcohol, required HLB, solubility parameter

INTRODUCTION dielectric constant of oils and between the HLB value and
The hydrophilic-lipophilic balance (HLB) for the the logarithm of the dielectric constant of nonionic surfac-
classification and selection of surface-active agents was first tants. Schott[4] demonstrated a nearly lineal correlation
issued in 1948 in a brochure of the Atlas Powder Com- when the solubility parameter of nonionic surfactants, cor-
pany.[1] The following year, William Griffin, one of the rected for hydration by including a hydrogen-bonding
company’s Chemists, formally presented the HLB concept component, was plotted versus the HLB values. These
in an article published in the first volume of the Journal of results and the fact that there exists correlation between
the Society of Cosmetic Chemists.[2] In this article, Griffin solubility parameters and dielectric constants[5] suggest
introduced the concepts of the required HLB values for oil that a correlation between the required HLB values and
in water (o=w) and for water in oil (w=o) emulsions and the solubility parameters of oils could be established. Hav-
described the methodology used for its experimental deter- ing a mathematic formula that would enable to calculate
mination. Griffin detailed a list of the required HLB values the required HLB of an oil from its solubility parameter
that included solid products such as cetyl alcohol, beeswax, would avoid its experimental determination. The latter,
carnauba wax, candelilla wax and stearic acid. The experi- apart from being quite laborious, could be affected by
ments for the determination of the required HLB values of errors, such as the one mentioned before in the case of solid
solids were carried out at 60–70 C. As the water affinity products. Thus, for instance, the published HBL required
(and the HLB value) of the nonionic surfactants with poly- values for the cetyl alcohol obtained experimentally were:
oxyethylene chains decrease as the temperatures rise, the 13,[2] 15,[6] 16,[7] 15.5,[8] and 14.78.[9] On the other hand,
required HLB values of these solids are consequently the knowledge of a more precise correlation between the
affected by an error in excess. required HLB and the dielectric constant than the one
Gorman and Hall[3] found a lineal correlation (r ¼ 0.85) obtained by Gorman and Hall[3] would allow calculating
between the required HLB values and the logarithm of the more trustworthy HLB required values for products
formed by complex mixtures, such as oils and natural
Received 18 November 2007; accepted 8 December 2007. waxes or for the oily phase of an emulsion, all of them
Address correspondence to Ricardo C. Pasquali, Departa- obtained from the determination of its dielectric constants.
mento de Tecnologı́a Farmacéutica, Facultad de Farmacia y Bio- The dielectric constants are more trustful and easier to
quı́mica, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Junı́n 956, 6 piso (1113), determine than the required HLB values using the techni-
Buenos Aires, Argentina. E-mail: rcpasquali@yahoo.com ques that evaluate the emulsion’s stability or the size of

328
NEW VALUES OF REQUIRED HLB OF SOLID FATTY ACIDS AND ALCOHOLS 329

the drops in the oily phase versus the HLB value of the TABLE 2
emulsifier.[2,10–13] Values of required HLB, solubility parameters and dielec-
The aims of this article are to find a correlation between tric constants of solid fatty acids and alcohols
the required HLB values and the solubility parameters of
oils; find a more precise correlation between the required Solubility
HLB values and the dielectric constant, than the one Required HLB parameter Dielectric
obtained by Gorman and Hall;[3] and to determine the Solid HLB references (J1=2 cm3=2) constant
required HLB values for o=w emulsions of solid fatty acids Cetyl 13 (2) 18.29 3.69b
and alcohols from the values of the solubility parameters alcohol 15 (6)
and dielectric constants published, that could be more 16 (7)
trustful than the ones obtained by the methodology pro- 15.5 (8,16)
posed by Griffin. 14.78 (9)
Stearyl 15–16 (7) 18.20 3.38b
MATERIAL AND METHODS alcohol
The required HLB, the solubility parameters and the 15.5 (8,16)
dielectric constants of the oils and the solids are listed, 13.93 (9)
respectively, in Tables 1 and 2. The solubility parameters Lauric 16 (7) 17.30 Not
were obtained from Vaughan,[14] the dielectric constants acid available
from Gorman and Hall[3] and Lide,[15] and the required Myristic Not 16.57 Not
HLB values from Gorman and Hall,[3] Griffin,[2,6] acid available available
ICI,[7,8,16] and Croda.[9] Palmitic Not 16.14 2.417b
acid available
Stearic 17 (26) 15.83 2.29a
acid
TABLE 1 2.314b
a
Values of required HLB, solubility parameters and From (3).
b
dielectric constants of the oils used for obtaining the From (15).
correlations
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Solubility
parameter The required HLB values of oils are related to the
Required HLB (J1=2 Dielectric solubility parameter (d), in J1=2 cm3=2, (Figure 1) by the
Oil HLB references cm3=2) constant Equation (1), and with the dielectric constant (e) (Figures 2
and 3) by the Equations (2) and (3). SHLB is the typical
Butyl stearate 11 (7) 15.71 3.14b deviation of the required HLB values.
Castor oil 13a (3) 18.20 4.67b
(7)
Cyclomethicone 8.0 (8,16) 12.25 Not Required HLB ¼ 0:8770d  2:79
D4 available r ¼ 0:995 ½1
Cyclomethicone 7.5 (8,16) 11.80 Not
SHLB ¼ 0:2
D5 available
Decyl alcohol 15 (7) 20.00 7.93c
Isopropyl 11.5 (8,16) 16.40 Not
Required HLB ¼ 0:8149 e þ 8:73
myristate available
Isopropyl 11.5 (8,16) 15.91 3.15b r ¼ 0:984 ½2
palmitate SHLB ¼ 0:4
Lauryl alcohol 14 (7) 19.45 6.5b
Mineral oil 10 (7) 14.46 2.1b
Oleyl alcohol 13.5 (7) 18.31 Not Required HLB ¼ 8:34551 log e þ 7:34
available r ¼ 0:989 ½3
Oleic acid 11 (3) 16.18 2.46b SHLB ¼ 0:4
a
Mean value.
b
From (3). Table 3 Provides the values of the required HLB fatty acids
c
From (15). and fatty alcohols calculated in Equations (1), (2), and (3).
330 R. C. PASQUALI ET AL.

FIG. 1. Required HLB of oil versus solubility parameter in J1=2 cm3=2.

FIG. 2. Required HLB of oil versus dielectric constant.

TABLE 3
Calculated required HLB values from Equations (1), (2), and (3).
Calculated required HLB

Solid Equation (1) (0.2) Equation (2) (0.4) Equation (3) (0.4)

Cetyl alcohol 13.2 11.7 12.1


Stearyl alcohol 13.2 11.5 11.8
Lauric acid 12.4 — —
Myristic acid 11.7 — —
Palmitic acid 11.4 10.7 10.5
Stearic acid 11.1 10.6 10.4
NEW VALUES OF REQUIRED HLB OF SOLID FATTY ACIDS AND ALCOHOLS 331

FIG. 3. Required HLB of oil versus logarithm of dielectric constant.

CONCLUSIONS [3] Gorman, W.G., and Hall, G.D. (1963) J. Pharm. Sci., 52:
Equation (1) represents the best correlation out of the 442–446.
three equations obtained that calculate the required HLB [4] Schott, H. (1984) J. Pharm. Sci., 73: 790–792.
[5] Paruta, A.N., Sciarrone, B.J., and Lordi, N.G. (1962)
for o=w emulsions. This equation would be the one recom-
J. Pharm. Sci., 51: 704–705.
mended to calculate the required HLB values for o=w
[6] Griffin, W.C. (1974) In Cosmetics. Science and Technology,
emulsions of oils or waxes when their solubility parameters edited by M.S. Balsam; New York: John Wiley & Sons,
are known. The values obtained from Equation (2) and pp. 573–629.
Equation (3) are similar. These equations can be used with [7] ICI. (1976). The HLB System; Wilmington, DE: ICI United
products whose composition is complex and also with the States of America Inc.
mixture of all the components of an emulsion’s oily phase [8] ICI. (1982). Emulsification of Selected Cosmetic Emollients;
after the determination of its dielectric constant. Wilmington, DE: ICI Americas Inc.
In the case of the oils, the use of these equations would [9] Croda. (2000) Guide to High Purity Raw Materials for
allow to estimate the required HLB values in a simpler way Pharmaceutical and Nutritional Use; Parsippany, NJ:
than using the methodology proposed by Griffin. In the Croda.
[10] Griffin, W.C., Ranauto, H.J., and Adams, A.D. (1966) Am.
solid products, such as the fatty acids and alcohols, further
Perf. Cosm., 81: 31–38.
to the latter advantage, the values obtained are more trust-
[11] Robbers, J.E., and Bhatia, V.N. (1961) J. Pharm. Sci., 50:
ful than the ones obtained with Griffin’s technique due to 708–709.
the dependence of the HLB values with the temperature [12] Orafidiya, L.O., and Oladimeji, F.A. (2002) Int. J. Pharm.,
of the nonionic surfactants used in the experiments. 237: 241–249.
[13] Gullapallia, R.P., and Shethb, B.B. (1999) Eur. J. Pharm.
Biopharm., 238: 233–238.
[14] Vaughan, C.D. (1985) J. Soc. Cosmet. Chem., 36: 319–333.
REFERENCES [15] Lide, D.R. (2001) CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics;
[1] Atlas. (1948) Surface Active Agents; Wilmington, Delaware: Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Atlas Powder Company. [16] ICI. (1990) The HLB System; Wilmington, DE: ICI
[2] Griffin, W.C. (1949) J. Soc. Cosmet. Chem., 1: 311–326. Americas Inc.

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen