Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
COMPARISON BETWEEN CIVILSOFT 2010 AND RCD 2000 IN THE DESIGN OF THREE STOREY RESIDENTIAL BUILDING
BY
THE DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING HASSAN USMAN KATSINA POLYTECHNIC
IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT FOR THE AWARD OF HIGHER NATIONAL DIPLOMA IN CIVIL ENGINEERING
AUGUST 2012
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Page 1
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
APPROVAL PAGE This Project has been read, supervised and approved by:
---------------------------Supervisor Name
-----------------------------Signature/Date
-----------------------------Project Coordinator
-------------------------------Signature/Date
-----------------------------Head of Department
-------------------------------Signature/Date
-----------------------------External Examiner
-------------------------------Signature/Date
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Page 2
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
CERTIFICATION This is to certify that the research work entitled Comparison between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the award of Higher National Diploma in Civil Engineering during the Session of 2011/2012 at Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic is a bona fide record of research work carried out by me under the supervision and guidance of Engr. Samaila Muazu Bawa.
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Page 3
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
DEDICATION This Project is dedicated to my beloved Parents, Brothers, and Sisters in Islam.
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Page 4
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
ABSTRACT The structural analysis and design of three storey residential building presented here has been carried out using Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 software Systems, The design was accomplished for reinforced concrete Slabs, Beams, Columns, and Foundations based on BS 8110. Whereby the results obtained was compared to determine the speed, accuracy, and simplicity between them. Also a series of hand design calculations were performed on Slabs, Beams, Columns and Foundations to verify manually.
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Page 5
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
ACKNOWLEDGMENT Praise be to Allah, The beneficent and most Merciful, Master of the Day of Judgment, May His grace and mercy be upon His Messenger, Prophet Muhammad (P.B.U.H) and those who follow and obey him until the Day of Judgment. I am very grateful to Allah, our Lord and Cherisher, for guiding me throughout my studies. Indeed, without His help and Will nothing is accomplished. My grateful thanks and gratitude goes to my beloved parents for their Motherly and financial support throughout my studies at Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic. I once again express my special gratitude to my fellow students for their support throughout the studies, especially Alh. Mukhtar B. Abdullahi for his friendly support during the project work. I also extend my appreciation and gratitude to project coordination team Civil Engineering Departments and also at the same time to my project supervisor in the person of Engr. Samaila Muazu Bawa for his dedication, kind gesture and hardworking from the beginning up to the end point of this project work. My sincere gratitude goes to the Head of Civil Engineering Department as well as the entire Staff of the Department for their highly concern and cooperation throughout this programme.
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Page 6
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
CHAPTER ONE (INTRODUCTION) 1.0 General .....1-2 1.1 Computer Application in Civil Engineering Profession.2-4 1.2.0 Aim and Objectives..4
1.2.1 Aim of the Project...4 1.2.2 Objectives of the Project.4 1.3.0 Scope and limitations of the Project5
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Page 7
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
CHAPTER TWO (LITERATURE REVIEW) 2.0 Preamble....7 2.1.0 Computers used in Structural Engineering Practice7-8 2.2.0 Computer Software.....8 2.2.1 Structural Analysis and Design Software8-9 2.2.2 Program Development in Engineering..9-10 2.2.3 Structures..10 2.2.4 Structural Design......10 2.2.5 Design Requirement....10-11 2.3.0 Characteristics Material Strength .........11 2.3.1 Design Method..11 2.3.2 Limit State Design.......11-12 2.3.3 Ultimate Limit State (ULS)......12 2.3.4 Serviceability Limit State (SLS)..12-13 2.3.5 Structure Element Make-up..13 2.4.0 Concrete Structural Element.13 2.4.1 Slab...13 2.4.2 Beam....13-14
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Page 8
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
2.4.3 Column......14 2.4.4 Staircase....14 2.4.5 Foundation............14 2.5.0 Structural Loading....15 2.5.1 Dead Load.....15 2.5.2 Live Load (Imposed load).....15 2.5.3 How Load is Transmitted in Structure......15 2.5.4 Structural deformation.........15-16 2.5.5 Design Calculations..........16 2.6.0 The Benefits of Using Software to Engineers/Students....16 CHAPTER THREE (METHODOLOGY) 3.0 Preamble......17 3.1.0 Analysis, Design and Detailing Procedures Using Civilsoft 2010..17-19 3.2.0 Analysis and Design Procedure Using RCD 2000 ..19 3.2.1 Program SL2000..19-22 3.2.2 3.2.3 3.2.4 3.4.0 Program BM2000.....22-23 Program CL2000..24-27 Program BS2000...27-31 The Results or Output of the Design..31 Page 9
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
CHAPTER FOUR (RESULT PRESENTATION AND DISCUSSION) 4.0 4.1.0 4.1.1 Preamble....32 Analysis and Design using Civilsoft 2010.....33 Slab Loading......33
4.2.0 Analysis and Design.....33 4.2.1 4.2.2 4.2.3 4.2.4 4.3.0 4.3.1 4.3.2 4.3.3 4.3.4 4.4.0 Slab Design...33-39 Beam Design.39-48 Column Design.....48-65 Foundation Design....65-71 Design and Analysis using RCD 2000...72 Slab Analysis and Design.....72-83 Beam Analysis and Design.....83-116 Column Analysis and Design...116-141 Base Analysis and Design....141-161 Result Summary...162-166
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Page 10
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
During the last few decades, computer software has become more and more critical in the analysis of Engineering and scientific problems. Much of the reason for this change from manual methods has been the advancement of Computer Techniques developed by the research Community and, in particular, Universities/Polytechnics. As both the Technology and Engineering Industries advance, new methodologies of interlinking and complementing the industries via Computer applications will be created, with a similar improvement in hardware capacities. This in turn will facilitate the implementation of more efficient and professional Engineering software. As these software applications advance in functionality, one can hope that they will be more affordable so as to promote their widespread usage amongst Civil Engineers at a global scale. Structural design of concrete primarily relates to compliance of the British standard that is use in the design of reinforced concrete structures for the purpose of ensuring safety and economy in the use of concrete structures. The method recommended in this code is that of limit state design. Account should be taken of accepted theory, and experience and the need to design for durability. Calculations alone do not produce safe, serviceable and durable structures, suitable materials, quality control and good supervision are equally important. The purpose of any design is the achievement of an acceptable probability that structures being designed will perform satisfactorily during their intended life. With an appropriate degree of
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Page 11
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
safety, they should sustain all the loads and deformations of normal construction use and have adequate durability and resistance to the effects of misuse and fire. The structure should be so designed that adequate means exist to transmit the design ultimate dead, wind and imposed loads safely from the highest supported level to the foundations. The layout of the structure and the interaction between the structural members should be such as to ensure a robust and stable design. Generally design includes allocation of other means of accessing and providing resistance against the designed structure in one which the members are arranged in such a way that the weight loads and force are transmitted to the foundation by the cheapest nature of the site, efficient design means and providing suitable sizes for the concrete members and providing of the allocated amount of reinforcement in an economical manner. This project deals with the creation of a computer application that analyzes and designs structural elements. The use of two software (i.e. Civilsoft 2010 and RCD2000) will be used in the design of one storey residential building to compare the speed, accuracy and simplicity of each of the two software having a manual work as guidance or as a control throughout the design processes. The project also aims at emphasizing the importance of computers in the solution of everyday engineering problems. 1.1 Computer Application In Civil Engineering Profession In this 21st century, technology has hit the climax more than one could imagine. A major invention that has enhanced speed, accuracy, efficiency and also become widely used in almost all fields of study and profession is computer software. Civil Engineering is not left out as there
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Page 12
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
are different types of software available to Civil Engineers. In all branches of Civil Engineering, being it Structural Engineering, Transportation Planning, Water Engineering, etc have their own separate software which can be used to solve different problems within a short time. There are different companies which have come up with software some of which are very expensive and complicated. As in this case, we are sticking our self to only Civilsoft 2010 and RCD2000. Civil engineers design and construct major structures and facilities that are essential in our everyday lives. Civil engineering is perhaps the broadest of the engineering fields, for it deals with the creation, improvement and protection of the communal environment, providing facilities for living, industry and transportation, including large buildings, roads, bridges, canals, railroad lines, airports, water-supply systems, dams, irrigation, harbors, docks, tunnels, and other engineered constructions. Over the course of history, civil engineers have made significant contributions and improvements to the environment and the world we live in today.
The work of a Civil Engineer requires a lot of precision. This is mainly due to the fact that the final result of any project will directly or indirectly affect peoples lives; hence safety becomes a critical issue. Designing structures and developing new facilities may take up to several months to complete. The volumes of work, as well as the seriousness of the issues considered in project planning, contribute to the amount of time required to complete the development of an adequate, safe and efficient design.
The introduction of software usage in the civil engineering profession has greatly reduced the complexities of different aspects in the analysis and design of projects, as well as reducing the amount of time necessary to complete the designs. Concurrently, this leads to greater savings and
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Page 13
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
reductions in costs. More complex projects that were almost impossible to work out several years ago are now easily solved with the use of computers. In order to stay at the pinnacle of any industry, one needs to keep at par with the latest technological advancements which accelerate work timeframes and accuracy without decreasing the reliability and efficiency of the results. 1.2.0 Aim and Objectives of the Project
1.2.1 Aim of the Project i. The aim of this project is to use Computer Application for the analysis, design and detailing of reinforced concrete elements. ii. And also to compare the speed, accuracy and simplicity between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the design of three storey residential building. 1.2.2 Objectives of the Project
The objectives of the project are:1. Obtain an architectural drawing 2. Manual Analysis and Design 3. Use Civilsoft 2010 to analyze, design and detail the structure. 4. Use RCD 2000 to analyze and design the structure. 5. Consider the time taken, and compare between them in order to know the speed of each. 6. Compare the simplicity or otherwise of each.
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Page 14
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
1.3.0
1.3.1 Scope The scope of this project is based on BS110 method of reinforced concrete design which will be use throughout in the design both for the Civilsoft 2010 and that of RCD 2000 that covers Slab, Beam, Column, and Foundation Design. 1.3.2 Limitations
The project is limited only in the design of concrete structural elements or components using Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 software. 1.4.0 Methodology
The structural design of slab, beam, column, and foundation in a given architectural Plan is, in most cases, very difficult. This comes with experience and the following steps were strictly follows:a) Study and grid the Architectural drawings (i.e. Site plan, ground floor plan, first floor plan, elevations, section, panel arrangement, etc). And note the number of storey. b) Carry out enquiries on the soil type to enable you determine whether or not the building will be designed as a framed structure or supported on load bearing walls. c) Based on the outcome of the above, design the building as framed building, if the number of storey exceed two or the soil pressure is low below (100KN/ being supported by load bearing walls.
Page 15
); otherwise design as
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
d) Identify the various panels for the slab design, bearing in mind that for domestic building, a span of 4.2m and below can economically be designed as a one way-spanning slab. e) Identify the position of beams. It is advisable to name beams by their grid numbers. E.g. E.1-4 meaning beam on grid line E and between grid lines 1 and 4. f) Identify the position of the columns and refers to them by their grid lines. E.g. Col A4 meaning column at the meeting point of grid lines A and 4. g) Determine the foundation type depending on the type of building and the nature of the bearing soil. h) Detailing of the structural elements. Detailing is the end product for the design and most important, hence, cannot be underestimated.
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Page 16
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
The selection of the type of concrete is frequently by the strength required, which in turn depends on the intensity of loading and the form. For example, in the lower columns of a multistory building a higher strength concrete may be chosen in preference to gently increasing the size of the column section with a resultant loss in dear floor space. Concrete is defined as the mixing of cement, sand, pebbles or crushed rock and water which when placed in the Skelton of forms and allowed to cure becomes hard reference the proportion of this material controls the strength and quality of the resultant concrete. 2.1.0 Computers Used In Structural Engineering Practice
It can be defined in the same vein as general purpose, stored program, and electronic digital computers. Digital means that within the computer, discrete digits represent numbers, which is in contrast to analog computers where numbers are represented by continuously varying physical quantities. Digital computers can also represents and manipulate symbols other than numbers, such as alphabetic characters or geometric entities. Electronic means that electronic circuits that perform the internal operations. Stored means that for each application, the computer is provided with a sequence of steps or instructions called the program, which defines the process of solution. General purpose means that the computer is not built specifically for one type of application so that by using different programs it is capable of solving a wide variety of problems.
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Page 17
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
The computer system can be said to consist of the hardware system and the software system. The hardware system consists of all the physical machines, which include the computer itself (Central processing unit, Primary memory, Arithmetic and logic units). The secondary memory system (hard disc, floppy disc, CD ROM), printers, plotters and video display unit (monitor). (Oyenuga, 2010) 2.2.0 Computer Software:- Are simply sequence of instructions telling the computer what to
do and how to do it. Softwares generally are programs written for a specific purpose and stored in a secondary storage device for later use. They are written in a coded language for the use of computers. The special languages are referred to as programming languages and typical examples include FORTRAN, BASIC, COBOL, C, ALGOL, and PASCAL. But FORTRAN, BASIC, PASCAL, and C are good for engineering analysis and design. (Oyenuga, 2010) 2.2.1 Structural Analysis and Design Software Currently, there are quite a number of structural analysis and design software applications present in the market. Although they are rather expensive, their use has become prevalent amongst a majority of Structural Engineers and Engineering firms. The computerized computations make use of the systematic sequences execute d in a computer program as well as the high processing speeds.
Below are some common Civil Engineering Software that are widely used: a. CIVILSOFT 2010 Structural 3D/2D Modeling, Loading, Analysis, Design, Detailing, Bar Schedule, Beam Sketchpad, Steel design, AutoCAD DXF import and export, and PDF export.
Page 18
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
b. RCD2000 Analysis and design of Reinforced Concrete. c. STAAD Pro d. RISA e. AutoCAD f. STRUDL g. SCADDS h. ADAPT-RC 2010 Plus Analysis and/or design of reinforced concrete beams, slabs and floor systems, designs up to 20 spans and two cantilevers. i. STADD III: Comprehensive Structural Software that addresses all aspects of Structural Engineering- model development, Analysis, Design, visualization and verification. j. AXIS VM: Structural Analysis and Design with an updateable database of element sections and specifications available in the market. k. ANSYS: All-inclusive Engineering Software dealing with Structural Analysis and other Engineering disciplines such as fluid dynamics, electronics and magnetism and heat transfer l. ETABS: Offers a sophisticated 3-D Analysis and Design for multistory building structures.
2.2.2
The use of computer in arriving at engineering solutions requires that problem solving be separated in to two phases of the program: a) Problem definition:- In this phase the computational procedure, the available resources (people, machine), and all known limitations are to develop the major functional and
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Page 19
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
conceptual aspects of the program, including the major input data types, the scope of the program and the results required. b) Program design:- In this phase , three sets of important decisions must be made and they are:i) The determination of the computational procedures, like the method of analysis to be followed, which may depart radically from the manual methods of analysis due to the use of the machines. ii) The organization and structuring of the data to be used by the program. This includes the data to be supplied as input and the expected output. iii) The interaction between the program and the intended users. This step is an important one and it includes the careful designation and entry of the input data and the layout of the expected output. A program requiring hours of preparing extraneous data for input and producing pages of unorganized numerical results would be unpopular. 2.2.3 Structures:- A structure may be defined as any object (system) that has the sole function
of transmitting load. The structure may consist of single element (referred as a member) or combination of several elements. (Oyenuga, 2010) 2.2.4 Structural Design:- Structural design is a mathematical approach of selecting and
coupling structural element sizes in order to withstand the applied load on them as well as to active the structural stability.
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Page 20
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
2.2.5
Design Requirement:- A good structure design must satisfy the basic requirement viz
that of strength, serviceability and economy. The requirement for strength is not ensure that the structure is capable of carrying the applied loads on it the requirement for serviceability relate to the amount of depletion, cracking., shear and vibration that may be acceptable by the structure, the final aim of designer is to minimize strength of the structure at minimum cost. 2.3.0 Characteristic Material Strength:-The strength of materials upon which design is based
in those strengths, which results are unlikely to fall. These are called characteristic strength. It is assumed that for a given Material, the distribution of strength will be approximately normal so that a frequency distribution curve of a large number of sample results would be of the form. 2.3.1 Design Method:- The design of an engineering structure most ensure that, under the
worst loading, the structure is safe and during normal working condition the deformation of the members does not detract from the appearance, durability or performance of the structure. The Three Basic Methods are:(1) The Permissible stress method: - In which the ultimate strength of the Materials are divided by a factor of safety to provide design stresses which are usually within the elastic range. (2) The load factor method: - In which the working load are multiplied by factor of safety. (3) The limit state method: - Which multiplied the working loads by partial factors of safety and also divides the material Intimates strength by further partial factor of safety.
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Page 21
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
2.3.2
Limit State Design The design of an engineering structure must ensure that (1) under the worst loadings, the structure is safe, and (2) during normal working conditions the deformation of the members does not detract from the appearance, durability or performance of the structure. The Limit State method involves applying partial factors of safety, both to the loads and to the material strengths. The magnitude of the factors may be varied so that they may be used either with the plastic conditions in the ultimate state or with the more elastic stress range in the working loads. The two principal type s of limit state are the ultimate limit state and the serviceability limit state. (Oyenuga, 2010)
2.3.3
Ultimate Limit State (ULS) This requires that the structure must be able to withstand, with an adequate factor of safety against collapse, the loads for which it is designed. The possibility of buckling or overturning must also be taken into account, as must the possibility of accidental damage as caused, for example, by an internal explosion.
2.3.4
Serviceability Limit State (SLS) This requires that the structural elements do not exhibit any preliminary signs of failure. Generally, the most important serviceability limit states are: Deflection (appearance or efficiency of any part of the structure must not be adversely affected by deflections), Cracking (local damage due to cracking and spalling must not affect the appearance, efficiency or durability of the structure) and Durability (in terms of the proposed life of
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Page 22
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
the structure and its conditions of exposure). Other Limit States that may be reached include: Excessive Vibration, Fatigue and Fire Resistance.
The relative importance of each limit state will vary according to the nature of the structure. The usual procedure is to decide which the crucial limit state for a particular structure is, and base the design on this, although durability and fire resistance requirements may well influence the initial member sizing and concrete grade selection. 2.3.5 Structure Element Make-Up
The structure element are of different make up among which are concrete steel or timber, however the structural element that will be of interest for the scope of this project is concrete. 2.4.0 Concrete Structural Element
The common concrete structural element are slab, beans, column, and foundation they are of different forms and have different foundation in a structure to which they are attached, they are discuss as follows; 2.4.1 Slab:- Is a planner structure element having an aerial that is comparatively larger them
its Overall thickness, it could he ribbed, solid, voided and flat slab. However, slab is usually constructed in horizontal plane, but when Vertical, they are referred to as shear walls. Its main function is to serve as floor, roof and transmit its weight plus imposed load that is on it to the beam. In many domestic and industrial buildings a thick concrete slab, supported on foundations or directly on the subsoil, is used to construct the ground floor of a building. In high rise buildings
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Page 23
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
and skyscrapers, thinner, pre-cast concrete slabs are slung between the steel frames to form the floors and ceilings on each level. 2.4.2 Beam:- Is a structural element having overall length that is comparatively larger than its
literal dimension, it is usually constructed in horizontal plane, However when constructed in vertical plane it becomes column, most common beams have cross section or shape that are either T beams, L beams, circular or trapezoidal. Its Main function is to transmit it self-weight and the weight from slab to the column. (Oyenuga, 2010) 2.4.3 Column: - Is a structural element, which the ratio of overall length to internal dimension
is comparatively large and they are usually vertical. However, column are members that carry load chiefly in compression column caring bending moment as well about one or both axis of the cross- section and bending reaction may produced tensile forces over a point of the correction even in such cases, column are generally referred to as compression members because the compression forces dominate the behavior. In fact the main faction of column is to transmit direct thrust (axial or eccentric lead) from the bean to the foundation.
2.4.4
dividing it into smaller vertical distances, called steps. Stairs may be straight, round, or may consist of two or more straight pieces connected at angles.
Special types of stairs include escalators and ladders. Some alternatives to stairs are elevators, stair lifts and inclined moving walkways as well as stationary inclined sidewalks.
2.4.5
Foundation: - The lowest artificially prepared parts of the structures which are in direct
contact with the ground and which transmits the load of the structures of the ground are known
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Page 24
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
as the foundation. The solid ground on which the foundation rest is called the foundation bed or foundation soil it ultimately bears the loads and interacts with the foundation of building. The lower most portion of the foundation which is direct contact with the sub-soil is called the footing. 2.5.0 Structural Loading:- The load on the structure is divided in to two types i.e. dead load
and live load or (imposed load) Dead load are those that are permanent and constant during the structure life live loads on the other hand is transient and are variable in magnitude for example due to wind or human occupants. For designing a safe and economical structure it is necessary to ascertain with affair a degree of accuracy, the various types of words which are likely to act on structure. The imposed load including wind load which are specified below 2.5.1 Dead Load: - This is the load of the materials used for the various components of a
building such as walls; roofs etc all provision of loads are thus included in dead load. Sometimes the provision the future construction, a partition wall is made by allowing a dead load of 0.01 KN/M2 of the area. 2.5.2 Live Load: - This is a movable load on the Floor and hence it is variable. It is also
sometime known as the superimposed load. It includes the load of persons standing on the floor, articles of furnitures, weight of the material temporary stored on a floor weight of a snow of a roof etc. 2.5.3 How Load is transmitted In a Structure: - The imposed load from the slab is carried by
a horizontal member called beam and from which the total combination of the load from the slab
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Page 25
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
and beam is carting a vertical supporting member called column. The column transferred the pressure to the soil in the most efficient manner. 2.5.4 Structural Deformation:- A given structure once loaded, may deformed by bending due
to the effect of (bending moment) by buckling (due to eccentric loading) by elongation (due to stretching force) or twist on a worst part it may experience all of the above effect and there worst result to failure, therefore to overcome such short coming the idea of design was rooted. 2.5.5 Design Calculations
The following are to be determined before embarking on the design calculations. I. The concrete grade to be employed:- for domestic buildings in Nigeria, it is advisable that concrete grade not exceeding 20N/mm2 be used. II. The type of steel to be used:- for domestic buildings, mild steel round bars may be sufficient with steel stresses, not exceeding 250N/mm2. Where however, such domestic clients can guarantee the supply of high yield tensile bars, such can be used with stresses (in Nigeria) limited to 410N/mm2. (Oyenuga, 2010) 2.6.0 The Benefits of Using Software to Engineers/Students
a. It enables the Engineers/Students to appreciate the use of Computer Aided Design (CAD) in their field of study to have fun playing with modern Technologies in their practice of Engineering. b. It is very fast, fluid, highly advanced and easy to use. No dull moments.
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Page 26
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
c. Software are widely used in so many Construction Companies, Universities and Polytechnics, so they will be taping in to a CAD tools that are peculiar to all, in which knowledge are constantly being updated, shared among all and the same world class technology is available and affordable to all. d. They are widely available and affordable to buy.
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Page 27
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
CHAPTER THREE (METHODOLOGY) 3.0 Preamble Structure is made up of different members joined together. The analysis of the structure tends to follow this too. The analysis of the structure as a whole component is very tedious and the advantages may not be worth the efforts. The analysis can be done manually or using computer programs written especially for very complex structures. The structure will consist of the slab, beam, column, and foundation joined together rigidly so as to act as one structure. The loads from the occupants are transmitted through the slab, beam, column, and foundation. Thus, each element of the structure, that is, slab, beam, column, and foundation must be designed to effectively handle its own dead load and the load being transferred to it. 3.1.0 Analysis, Design and Detailing Procedure Using Civil Soft 2010
1) Switch on the system and permit it to boot 2) Search for the installed Civilsoft 2010 on the Desktop, if not found go to All Programs and traced Civilsoft 2010 3) Open the program by double clicking on it 4) On the Civilsoft 2010 workspace, click file and click new project, all the tools will be switched on ready to be used. The workspace is ruled and calibrated on both axis using 500mm equal intervals
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Page 28
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
5) On the menu bar click on modeling where you find tools such as rectangle, special panel, reference by panel, panel properties, etc. 6) Click on rectangle 7) Come to the workspace then hold and drag to draw a panel then click again to go out of the command 8) A single panel is drawn on the workspace 9) If there are more panels to be drawn, select the first panel and click reference by panel in order to have the subsequent panels on either left hand side or right hand side or bottom of the existing one 10) This step is repeated until the entire ground floor plan is drawn on the workspace 11) In order to edit the drawing to meet the required dimensions as contain in the architectural drawing 12) Edit the edge condition, depth, Fcu, Fy, Cc, Qk, Gk, etc of each panel 13) Click copy floor in order to have the first upper floor 14) Edit where necessary if different from the ground floor, provide a cantilever where necessary 15) Repeat copy floor and where necessary for each of the floors you have 16) Go back to the ground floor on the same workspace Modeling 17) Click create beam span, click create new 18) Click create column, click create new column, click create foundation, click create new 19) Go to the next floor (Second floor) 20) Click create beam span , click create new, click create column, click append column 21) This step is repeated for the remaining floors up to roof
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Page 29
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
22) Go to the menu bar and change the workspace to design by clicking design 23) Click load structure, click analyze structure, click design structure, click design pad foundation 24) Click view on the menu bar 25) Click 3D on the tool bar in order to see the 3-dimension view of the drawn structure if it is as required then proceed otherwise go back to modeling environment and edit it to meet your requirement. 26) In order to view the detailed drawing as result/output change the workspace by clicking on Detailing then select what you want to display by clicking on it, e.g. click on floor general arrangement to view the detail for the particular floor. You can click on foundation layout, floor slab details, column details, pad foundation details, etc. to view the detail drawing. 3.2.0 3.2.1 Analysis and Design Procedure Using RCD2000 Program SL2000
Inputs via terminal Enter job reference Enter design engineer Samaila Sani Saulawa Enter design date 20/08/2012
Page 30
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
Enter concrete & steel characteristics stresses 25 410 Enter total No of panels 4 For inputs No 1 Enter panel ID No Panel 1 Enter -1- for cantilever slab Enter -2- for s. supported slab Enter -3- for continuous slab Enter -4- for two way slab Eg 2 For simply supported slab Enter slab span, udl, depth and no. of point loads Eg 3225 10.52 150.0 0 For continuous slab Enter total no. of spans and slab depth
Page 31
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
Eg 2 150.0 Enter end cantilever moments and loads Eg 13.894 6.312 For span 1 enter span length, udl and no. point loads Eg 8225 10.52 0 For span 2 enter span length, udl and no. point loads E.g 4625 10.52 0 For point load, enter load and distance from left Sppt 15.0 1500 For cantilever slab Enter cantilever span, udl, depth and no. point loads eg 500 10.52 150.0 0 For point load, enter load and distance from fixed sppt 20.0 600 For two way slab
Page 32
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
Enter the slab lx, ly, udl, deph & span depth eg 5225 8225 10.52 150.0 25 Enter -1- for interior panel Enter -2- for one short discontinuous Enter -3- for one long discontunous Enter -4- for two adjacent edges discontunous Enter -5- for two short edges discontinuous Enter -6- for two long edges discontinuous Enter -7- for three edges discontinuous 1-long cont. Enter -8- for three edges discontinuous 1-short cont. Enter -9- for four edges discontinuous Enter slab case number 3.2.2 Program BM2000
Inputs via terminal Enter job reference e.g design of three storey building Enter design engineer
Page 33
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
Samaila Sani Saulawa Enter design date 20/08/2012 Enter no beams, concrete, steel and stirrup stresses 3 25 410 250 Enter beam id no. Beam 1 Enter no of supports & members 21 Enter supports grid number (2 space for each) ab cd Enter beam width (b, bf) and depth (h, hf) 225 600 450 150 Enter end supports types, moments and loads if any 0 91.20 112.0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 Enter member s/n, span and loads
Page 34
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
Inputs for the value for span 1 1 4500 60.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Inputs the value for span 2 2 5000 25.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 These steps continues up to the total number of beams 3.2.3 Program CL2000
Inputs via terminal Enter job reference e.g design of three storey building Enter design engineer Samaila Sani Saulawa Enter design date 20/08/2012 Enter concrete & steel stresses Total No of columns, max steel % d/h e.g 25 410 3 4 0 0.85 The following are repeated for each column
Page 35
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
For column no 1 Enter column identification CL1 Enter column type & shape (Type -1: axial 2: uniaxial 3: biaxial) (Shape -1: rectangular/square 2: circular) e.g 1 1 Enter -1 for braced col. or -2- for unbraced e.g 1 Braced Column Top end cond. Bottom cond. 1 1 2 0.75 0.80 End cond. 2 0.80 0.85
0.95
1.20
1.20
Page 36
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
1.30
1.50
1.60 2.20
1.80 -
Enter column dimension (x,y axis, length) and load e.g 300 300 4150 720.0 End input for column 1 For column no. 2 Enter column identification CL2 Enter column type & shape (Type -1: axial 2: uniaxial 3: biaxial) (Shape -1: rectangular/square 2: circular) 12 Enter values of bx & by 0.75 0.80
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Page 37
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
Enter column dimension (x,y axis, length), load and moments ( mxx, myy) 300 300 3150 570.0 25.0 0.00 For column no 3 Enter column identification CL3 Enter column type & shape (Type -1: axial 2: uniaxial 3: biaxial) (Shape -1: rectangular/square 2: circular) 31 Enter -1 for braced col. or -2- for unbraced 2 Enter values of Bx & By 1.20 1.50 Enter column dimension (x,y axis, length), load and moments ( Mxx, Myy) 300 300 3000 240.0 12.0 22.0 End of input for the remaining columns. 3.2.4 Program BS2000
Page 38
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
Inputs via terminal Enter job reference e.g design of three storey building Enter design engineer Samaila Sani Saulawa Enter design date 20/08/2012 Enter No. of bases, pressure, concrete & steel stresses 4 150 20 250 Enter base identification no Base 1 Enter base type -1: square 2: rect. & 3: combined 1 Enter base column type 1: rect. 2: circular 1 Enter column load, dimension, & dowel diameter 430 225 225 16
Page 39
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
For base 2 enter base identification no Base 2 Enter base type -1: square 2: rect. & 3: combined 2 Enter base column type 1: rect. 2: circular 2 Enter column load, dimension, & dowel diameter 890 300 20 For base 3 Enter base identification no Base 3 Enter base type -1: square 2: rect. & 3: combined 3 Enter total No of columns on the base 2 Enter column type for each column
Page 40
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
11 For base 3 column 1 enter Load dist. from col. 1, dimension & dowel diameter 580 0.00 225 450 16 For base 3 column 2 enter Load dist. from col. 1, dimension & dowel diameter 320 2600 225 225 16 For base 4 Enter base identification no Base 4 Enter base type -1: square 2: rect. & 3: combined 3 Enter total No of columns on the base 5 Enter column type for each column 11112 For base 4 column 1 enter
Page 41
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
Load dist. from col. 1, dimension & dowel diameter 420 0.00 225 225 16 for base 4 column 2 enter Load dist. from col. 1, dimension & dowel diameter 760 3600 450 225 16 For base 4 column 3 enter Load dist. from col. 1, dimension & dowel diameter 820 7800 450 225 20 For base 4 column 4 enter Load dist. from col. 1, dimension & dowel diameter 760 12600 450 225 20 For base 4 column 5 enter Load dist. from col. 1, dimension & dowel diameter 360 15600 300 16 3.3.0 The Results or Output of the Design
In the output listing, efforts have been made to reduce the volume of output to the most designed results that can be used for the drafting as well as for design checks. Thus, for beams, slabs, and bases, the span and support moments, area of steel required and shear
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Page 42
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
treatment (where applicable) are printed as output. The ultimate strength of the column in terms of axial and moments and area of steel are the results printed for columns.
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Page 43
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
CHAPTER FOUR (DESIGN AND ANALYSIS) 4.0 Preamble The purpose of any design is the achievement of an acceptable probability that structures being designed will perform satisfactorily during their intended life. With an appropriate degree of safety, they should sustain all the loads and deformations of normal construction use and have adequate durability and resistance to the effects of misuse and fire. The structure should be so designed that adequate means exist to transmit the design ultimate dead, wind and imposed loads safely from the highest supported level to the foundations. The layout of the structure and the interaction between the structural members should be such as to ensure a robust and stable design. Structure is made up of different members joined together. The analysis of the structure tends to follow this too. The analysis of the structure as a whole component is very tedious and the advantages may not be worth the efforts. The analysis can be done manually or using computer programs written especially for very complex structures. Generally design includes allocation of other means of accessing and providing resistance against the designed structure in one which the members are arranged in such away that the weight loads and force are transmitted to the foundation by the cheapest nature of the site, efficient design means and providing suitable sizes for the concrete members and providing of the allocated amount of reinforcement in an economical manner.
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Page 44
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
The Design and Analysis of the project for both Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 is as follows: 4.1.0 4.1.1 Analysis and Design Using Civilsoft 2010 Slab Loading
Slab Thickness = 150mm Characteristic imposed load = 1.5KN/m Finishes = 1.2KN/m Partition allowance = 1KN/m Density of concrete = 24KN/m Self-weight of slab = 0.15 x 24 = 3.6KN/m Characteristic dead load , gk = 3.6 + 1.2 + 1 = 5.8KN/m Design ultimate load = 1.4gk + 1.6 qk Design ultimate load , n = 1.4 x 5.8 + 1.6 x 1.5 = 10.52KN/m Design ultimate load , n = 10.52KN/m
4.2.0 4.2.1
Panel 1 Total design load ,n = 10.52KN/m Length of short span ,lx = 3000mm : Length of long span ,ly = 3500mm : ly / lx = 1.166667 Short span - mid span : Msx = Bsx x n x lx = 2.9KNm/m effective depth, d = 124 : As required = 69.98 : As provided = 377 : Use Y12 @ 300 : Deflection Check Ok
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Page 45
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
Long span - mid span : Msy = Bsy x n x lx = 2.27KNm/m effective depth, d = 112 : As required = 69.98 : As provided = 377 : Use Y12 @ 300 Short span - edge : Mx = Bx x n x lx = 3.82KNm/m effective depth, d = 124 : As required = 92.18 : As provided = 377 : Use Y12 @ 300 Long span - edge : My = By x n x lx = 3.03KNm/m effective depth, d = 124 : As required = 73.11 : As provided = 377 : Use Y12 @ 300 Panel 2 Total design load ,n = 10.52KN/m Length of short span ,lx = 2000mm : Length of long span ,ly = 2100mm : ly / lx = 1.05 Short span - mid span : Msx = Bsx x n x lx = 1.09KNm/m effective depth, d = 124 : As required = 26.3 : As provided = 377 : Use Y12 @ 300 : Deflection Check Ok Long span - mid span : Msy = Bsy x n x lx = 1.01KNm/m effective depth, d = 112 : As required = 26.3 : As provided = 377 : Use Y12 @ 300 Short span - edge : Mx = Bx x n x lx = 1.43KNm/m effective depth, d = 124 : As required = 34.51 : As provided = 377 : Use Y12 @ 300 Long span - edge : My = By x n x lx = 1.35KNm/m effective depth, d = 124 : As required = 32.58 : As provided = 377 : Use Y12 @ 300 Panel 3 Total design load ,n = 10.52KN/m Length of short span ,lx = 1500mm : Length of long span ,ly = 9600mm : ly / lx = 6.4 Short span - mid span : Msx = Bsx x n x lx = 2.96KNm/m effective depth, d = 124 : As required = 71.42 : As provided = 377 : Use Y12 @ 300 : Deflection
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Page 46
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
Check Ok Long span - mid span : Msy = Bsy x n x lx = 0KNm/m effective depth, d = 112 : As required = 71.42 : As provided = 377 : Use Y12 @ 300 Short span - edge : Mx = Bx x n x lx = 0KNm/m effective depth, d = 124 : As required = 0 : As provided = 0 : Use Y12 @ 300 Long span - edge : My = By x n x lx = 0KNm/m effective depth, d = 124 : As required = 0 : As provided = 0 : Use Y12 @ 300 Panel 4 Total design load ,n = 10.52KN/m Length of short span ,lx = 3500mm : Length of long span ,ly = 3500mm : ly / lx = 1 Short span - mid span : Msx = Bsx x n x lx = 3.09KNm/m effective depth, d = 124 : As required = 74.56 : As provided = 377 : Use Y12 @ 300 : Deflection Check Ok Long span - mid span : Msy = Bsy x n x lx = 3.09KNm/m effective depth, d = 112 : As required = 74.56 : As provided = 377 : Use Y12 @ 300 Short span - edge : Mx = Bx x n x lx = 3.99KNm/m effective depth, d = 124 : As required = 96.28 : As provided = 377 : Use Y12 @ 300 Long span - edge : My = By x n x lx = 4.12KNm/m effective depth, d = 124 : As required = 99.41 : As provided = 377 : Use Y12 @ 300 Panel 5 Total design load ,n = 10.52KN/m Length of short span ,lx = 3000mm : Length of long span ,ly = 7000mm : ly / lx = 2.333333 Short span - mid span : Msx = Bsx x n x lx = 11.84KNm/m
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Page 47
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
effective depth, d = 124 : As required = 285.69 : As provided = 377 : Use Y12 @ 300 : Deflection Check Ok Long span - mid span : Msy = Bsy x n x lx = 0KNm/m effective depth, d = 112 : As required = 285.69 : As provided = 377 : Use Y12 @ 300 Short span - edge : Mx = Bx x n x lx = 0KNm/m effective depth, d = 124 : As required = 0 : As provided = 0 : Use Y12 @ 300 Long span - edge : My = By x n x lx = 0KNm/m effective depth, d = 124 : As required = 0 : As provided = 0 : Use Y12 @ 300 Panel 6 Total design load ,n = 10.52KN/m Length of short span ,lx = 3500mm : Length of long span ,ly = 3500mm : ly / lx = 1 Short span - mid span : Msx = Bsx x n x lx = 3.09KNm/m effective depth, d = 124 : As required = 74.56 : As provided = 377 : Use Y12 @ 300 : Deflection Check Ok Long span - mid span : Msy = Bsy x n x lx = 3.09KNm/m effective depth, d = 112 : As required = 74.56 : As provided = 377 : Use Y12 @ 300 Short span - edge : Mx = Bx x n x lx = 3.99KNm/m effective depth, d = 124 : As required = 96.28 : As provided = 377 : Use Y12 @ 300 Long span - edge : My = By x n x lx = 4.12KNm/m effective depth, d = 124 : As required = 99.41 : As provided = 377 : Use Y12 @ 300 Panel 7 Total design load ,n = 10.52KN/m Length of short span ,lx = 5100mm : Length of long span ,ly = 7000mm : ly / lx = 1.372549
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Page 48
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
Short span - mid span : Msx = Bsx x n x lx = 9.97KNm/m effective depth, d = 124 : As required = 240.57 : As provided = 377 : Use Y12 @ 300 : Deflection Check Ok Long span - mid span : Msy = Bsy x n x lx = 6.57KNm/m effective depth, d = 112 : As required = 240.57 : As provided = 377 : Use Y12 @ 300 Short span - edge : Mx = Bx x n x lx = 13.38KNm/m effective depth, d = 124 : As required = 322.85 : As provided = 377 : Use Y12 @ 300 Long span - edge : My = By x n x lx = 8.76KNm/m effective depth, d = 124 : As required = 211.38 : As provided = 377 : Use Y12 @ 300 Panel 8 Total design load ,n = 10.52KN/m Length of short span ,lx = 3500mm : Length of long span ,ly = 3500mm : ly / lx = 1 Short span - mid span : Msx = Bsx x n x lx = 3.09KNm/m effective depth, d = 124 : As required = 74.56 : As provided = 377 : Use Y12 @ 300 : Deflection Check Ok Long span - mid span : Msy = Bsy x n x lx = 3.09KNm/m effective depth, d = 112 : As required = 74.56 : As provided = 377 : Use Y12 @ 300 Short span - edge : Mx = Bx x n x lx = 3.99KNm/m effective depth, d = 124 : As required = 96.28 : As provided = 377 : Use Y12 @ 300 Long span - edge : My = By x n x lx = 4.12KNm/m effective depth, d = 124 : As required = 99.41 : As provided = 377 : Use Y12 @ 300 Panel 9 Total design load ,n = 10.52KN/m
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Page 49
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
Length of short span ,lx = 2000mm : Length of long span ,ly = 8600mm : ly / lx = 4.3 Short span - mid span : Msx = Bsx x n x lx = 5.26KNm/m effective depth, d = 124 : As required = 126.92 : As provided = 377 : Use Y12 @ 300 : Deflection Check Ok Long span - mid span : Msy = Bsy x n x lx = 0KNm/m effective depth, d = 112 : As required = 126.92 : As provided = 377 : Use Y12 @ 300 Short span - edge : Mx = Bx x n x lx = 0KNm/m effective depth, d = 124 : As required = 0 : As provided = 0 : Use Y12 @ 300 Long span - edge : My = By x n x lx = 0KNm/m effective depth, d = 124 : As required = 0 : As provided = 0 : Use Y12 @ 300 Panel 10 Total design load ,n = 10.52KN/m Length of short span ,lx = 2000mm : Length of long span ,ly = 3000mm : ly / lx = 1.5 Short span - mid span : Msx = Bsx x n x lx = 1.68KNm/m effective depth, d = 124 : As required = 40.54 : As provided = 377 : Use Y12 @ 300 : Deflection Check Ok Long span - mid span : Msy = Bsy x n x lx = 1.01KNm/m effective depth, d = 112 : As required = 40.54 : As provided = 377 : Use Y12 @ 300 Short span - edge : Mx = Bx x n x lx = 2.23KNm/m effective depth, d = 124 : As required = 53.81 : As provided = 377 : Use Y12 @ 300 Long span - edge : My = By x n x lx = 1.35KNm/m effective depth, d = 124 : As required = 32.58 : As provided = 377 : Use Y12 @ 300 Panel 11
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Page 50
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
Total design load ,n = 10.52KN/m Length of short span ,lx = 3000mm : Length of long span ,ly = 3500mm : ly / lx = 1.166667 Short span - mid span : Msx = Bsx x n x lx = 2.9KNm/m effective depth, d = 124 : As required = 69.98 : As provided = 377 : Use Y12 @ 300 : Deflection Check Ok Long span - mid span : Msy = Bsy x n x lx = 2.27KNm/m effective depth, d = 112 : As required = 69.98 : As provided = 377 : Use Y12 @ 300 Short span - edge : Mx = Bx x n x lx = 3.82KNm/m effective depth, d = 124 : As required = 92.18 : As provided = 377 : Use Y12 @ 300 Long span - edge : My = By x n x lx = 3.03KNm/m effective depth, d = 124 : As required = 73.11 : As provided = 377 : Use Y12 @ 300 Code reference - BS 8110 : Part 1 : 1997 : Section 3.5.3.4
4.2.2
Beam Design
Beam 1 Depth = 450 mm : Breadth = 225 mm : Cover = 25 mm : Bar dia = 16 : fcu = 25N/mm : fy = 410 N/mm : effectiveDepth, d = 409 mm Span 1 : Length = 6000 mm : Start Reaction = 66.33 KN : End Reaction = 66.33 KN : Span Moment = 185.18 KNm As Required = 1453.9 mm : As Provided = 1608 mm : Use = 8Y16 : Deflection Check Ok : Shear Check Ok : Use Y8 @ 300
Beam 2
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Page 51
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
Depth = 450 mm : Breadth = 225 mm : Cover = 25 mm : Bar dia = 16 : fcu = 25N/mm : fy = 410 N/mm : effectiveDepth, d = 409 mm Span 1 : Length = 3500 mm : Start Reaction = 39.67 KN : End Reaction = 39.67 KN : Span Moment = 113.1 KNm As Required = 843.94 mm : As Provided = 1005 mm : Use = 5Y16 : Deflection Check Ok : Shear Check Ok : Use Y8 @ 300
Beam 3 Depth = 450 mm : Breadth = 225 mm : Cover = 25 mm : Bar dia = 16 : fcu = 25N/mm : fy = 410 N/mm : effectiveDepth, d = 409 mm Span 1 : Length = 2100 mm : Start Reaction = 22.17 KN : End Reaction = 22.17 KN : Span Moment = 41.49 KNm As Required = 274.63 mm : As Provided = 402 mm : Use = 2Y16 : Deflection Check Ok : Shear Check Ok : Use Y8 @ 300
Beam 4 Depth = 450 mm : Breadth = 225 mm : Cover = 25 mm : Bar dia = 16 : fcu = 25N/mm : fy = 410 N/mm : effectiveDepth, d = 409 mm Span 1 : Length = 2100 mm : Start Reaction = 22.17 KN : End Reaction = 22.17 KN : Span Moment = 41.49 KNm As Required = 274.63 mm : As Provided = 402 mm : Use = 2Y16 : Deflection Check Ok : Shear Check Ok : Use Y8 @ 300
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Page 52
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
Beam 5 Depth = 450 mm : Breadth = 225 mm : Cover = 25 mm : Bar dia = 16 : fcu = 25N/mm : fy = 410 N/mm : effectiveDepth, d = 409 mm Span 1 : Length = 6000 mm : Start Reaction = 84.25 KN : End Reaction = 76.06 KN : Span Moment = 338.6 KNm As Required = 2524.25 mm : As Provided = 2613 mm : Use = 13Y16 : Deflection Check Ok : Shear Check Ok : Use Y8 @ 300
Beam 6 Depth = 450 mm : Breadth = 225 mm : Cover = 25 mm : Bar dia = 16 : fcu = 25N/mm : fy = 410 N/mm : effectiveDepth, d = 409 mm Span 1 : Length = 3500 mm : Start Reaction = 48.01 KN : End Reaction = 52.83 KN : Span Moment = 114.15 KNm As Required = 853.62 mm : As Provided = 1005 mm : Use = 5Y16 : Deflection Check Ok : Shear Check Ok : Use Y8 @ 300
Beam 7 Depth = 450 mm : Breadth = 225 mm : Cover = 25 mm : Bar dia = 16 : fcu = 25N/mm : fy = 410 N/mm : effectiveDepth, d = 409 mm Span 1 : Length = 3000 mm : Start Reaction = 45.04 KN : End Reaction = 41.56 KN : Span Moment = 49.97 KNm As Required = 334.75 mm : As Provided = 402 mm : Use = 2Y16 : Deflection Check Ok : Shear Check Ok : Use Y8 @ 300
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Page 53
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
Span 2 : Length = 5100 mm : Start Reaction = 68.52 KN : End Reaction = 68.52 KN : Span Moment = 583.42 KNm As Required = 4232.27 mm : As Provided = 4422 mm : Use = 22Y16 : Deflection Check Ok : Shear Check Ok : Use Y8 @ 300 Span 3 : Length = 3500 mm : Start Reaction = 48.01 KN : End Reaction = 52.83 KN : Span Moment = 996.21 KNm As Required = 7112.14 mm : As Provided = 7236 mm : Use = 36Y16 : Deflection Check Ok : Shear Check Ok : Use Y8 @ 300
Support 2 : Support Moment = -50.18 KNm : As Required = 334.39 mm : As Provided = 402 mm : Use = 2Y16 Support 3 : Support Moment = -55.22 KNm : As Required = 370.66 mm : As Provided = 402 mm : Use = 2Y16
Beam 8 Depth = 450 mm : Breadth = 225 mm : Cover = 25 mm : Bar dia = 16 : fcu = 25N/mm : fy = 410 N/mm : effectiveDepth, d = 409 mm Span 1 : Length = 3500 mm : Start Reaction = 46.43 KN : End Reaction = 46.43 KN : Span Moment = 113.64 KNm As Required = 848.91 mm : As Provided = 1005 mm : Use = 5Y16 : Deflection Check Ok : Shear Check Ok : Use Y8 @ 300
Beam 9
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Page 54
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
Depth = 450 mm : Breadth = 225 mm : Cover = 25 mm : Bar dia = 16 : fcu = 25N/mm : fy = 410 N/mm : effectiveDepth, d = 409 mm Span 1 : Length = 3000 mm : Start Reaction = 37.4 KN : End Reaction = 37.4 KN : Span Moment = 51.06 KNm As Required = 342.6 mm : As Provided = 402 mm : Use = 2Y16 : Deflection Check Ok : Shear Check Ok : Use Y8 @ 300 Span 2 : Length = 5100 mm : Start Reaction = 70.66 KN : End Reaction = 70.66 KN : Span Moment = 583.63 KNm As Required = 4233.73 mm : As Provided = 4422 mm : Use = 22Y16 : Deflection Check Ok : Shear Check Ok : Use Y8 @ 300 Span 3 : Length = 3500 mm : Start Reaction = 45.45 KN : End Reaction = 45.45 KN : Span Moment = 1250.58 KNm As Required = 8886.78 mm : As Provided = 9045 mm : Use = 45Y16 : Deflection Check Ok : Shear Check Ok : Use Y8 @ 300 Support 2 : Support Moment = -49.86 KNm : As Required = 332.11 mm : As Provided = 402 mm : Use = 2Y16 Support 3 : Support Moment = -54.83 KNm : As Required = 367.83 mm : As Provided = 402 mm : Use = 2Y16
Beam 10 Depth = 450 mm : Breadth = 225 mm : Cover = 25 mm : Bar dia = 12 : fcu = 25N/mm : fy = 410 N/mm : effectiveDepth, d = 413 mm Span 1 : Length = 3000 mm : Start Reaction = 32.44 KN : End Reaction = 32.44 KN : Span
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Page 55
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
Moment = 0 KNm As Required = 0 mm : As Provided = 226 mm : Use = 2Y12 : Deflection Check Ok : Shear Check Ok : Use Y8 @ 300 Span 2 : Length = 8600 mm : Start Reaction = 95.07 KN : End Reaction = 95.07 KN : Span Moment = 1265.39 KNm As Required = 8990.1 mm : As Provided = 9045 mm : Use = 45Y16 : Deflection Check Not Ok : Shear Check Ok : Use Y8 @ 300 Support 2 : Support Moment = -157.84 KNm : As Required = 1258.19 mm : As Provided = 1407 mm : Use = 7Y16 Beam 11 Depth = 450 mm : Breadth = 225 mm : Cover = 25 mm : Bar dia = 16 : fcu = 25N/mm : fy = 410 N/mm : effectiveDepth, d = 409 mm Span 1 : Length = 3500 mm : Start Reaction = 39.46 KN : End Reaction = 39.46 KN : Span Moment = 82.66 KNm As Required = 582.76 mm : As Provided = 603 mm : Use = 3Y16 : Deflection Check Ok : Shear Check Ok : Use Y8 @ 300
Beam 12 Depth = 450 mm : Breadth = 225 mm : Cover = 25 mm : Bar dia = 16 : fcu = 25N/mm : fy = 410 N/mm : effectiveDepth, d = 409 mm Span 1 : Length = 7000 mm : Start Reaction = 83.12 KN : End Reaction = 83.12 KN : Span Moment = 346.08 KNm As Required = 2576.44 mm : As Provided = 2613 mm : Use = 13Y16 : Deflection Check Ok :
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Page 56
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
Shear Check Ok : Use Y8 @ 300 Span 2 : Length = 2000 mm : Start Reaction = 21.01 KN : End Reaction = 21.01 KN : Span Moment = 759.51 KNm As Required = 5460.78 mm : As Provided = 5628 mm : Use = 28Y16 : Deflection Check Ok : Shear Check Ok : Use Y8 @ 300 Support 2 : Support Moment = -115.47 KNm : As Required = 859.64 mm : As Provided = 1005 mm : Use = 5Y16
Beam 13 Depth = 450 mm : Breadth = 225 mm : Cover = 25 mm : Bar dia = 16 : fcu = 25N/mm : fy = 410 N/mm : effectiveDepth, d = 409 mm Span 1 : Length = 1500 mm : Start Reaction = 15.35 KN : End Reaction = 15.35 KN : Span Moment = 21.72 KNm As Required = 143.52 mm : As Provided = 402 mm : Use = 2Y16 : Deflection Check Ok : Shear Check Ok : Use Y8 @ 300
Beam 14 Depth = 450 mm : Breadth = 225 mm : Cover = 25 mm : Bar dia = 16 : fcu = 25N/mm : fy = 410 N/mm : effectiveDepth, d = 409 mm Span 1 : Length = 7000 mm : Start Reaction = 107.35 KN : End Reaction = 107.35 KN : Span Moment = 313.03 KNm As Required = 2345.86 mm : As Provided = 2412 mm : Use = 12Y16 : Deflection Check Ok : Shear Check Ok : Use Y8 @ 300
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Page 57
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
Span 2 : Length = 2000 mm : Start Reaction = 23.21 KN : End Reaction = 23.21 KN : Span Moment = 722.88 KNm As Required = 5205.21 mm : As Provided = 5226 mm : Use = 26Y16 : Deflection Check Ok : Shear Check Ok : Use Y8 @ 300 Support 2 : Support Moment = -148.68 KNm : As Required = 1194.97 mm : As Provided = 1206 mm : Use = 6Y16
Beam 15 Depth = 450 mm : Breadth = 225 mm : Cover = 25 mm : Bar dia = 16 : fcu = 25N/mm : fy = 410 N/mm : effectiveDepth, d = 409 mm Span 1 : Length = 3500 mm : Start Reaction = 60.35 KN : End Reaction = 67.31 KN : Span Moment = 115.49 KNm As Required = 866.05 mm : As Provided = 1005 mm : Use = 5Y16 : Deflection Check Ok : Shear Check Ok : Use Y8 @ 300
Beam 16 Depth = 450 mm : Breadth = 225 mm : Cover = 25 mm : Bar dia = 16 : fcu = 25N/mm : fy = 410 N/mm : effectiveDepth, d = 409 mm Span 1 : Length = 3500 mm : Start Reaction = 60.56 KN : End Reaction = 67.52 KN : Span Moment = 115.58 KNm As Required = 866.89 mm : As Provided = 1005 mm : Use = 5Y16 : Deflection Check Ok : Shear Check Ok : Use Y8 @ 300
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Page 58
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
Beam 17 Depth = 450 mm : Breadth = 225 mm : Cover = 25 mm : Bar dia = 16 : fcu = 25N/mm : fy = 410 N/mm : effectiveDepth, d = 409 mm Span 1 : Length = 3500 mm : Start Reaction = 51.78 KN : End Reaction = 51.78 KN : Span Moment = 78.2 KNm As Required = 547.21 mm : As Provided = 603 mm : Use = 3Y16 : Deflection Check Ok : Shear Check Ok : Use Y8 @ 300 Span 2 : Length = 3500 mm : Start Reaction = 51.78 KN : End Reaction = 51.78 KN : Span Moment = 452.14 KNm As Required = 3316.38 mm : As Provided = 3417 mm : Use = 17Y16 : Deflection Check Ok : Shear Check Ok : Use Y8 @ 300 Support 2 : Support Moment = -45.31 KNm : As Required = 299.87 mm : As Provided = 402 mm : Use = 2Y16
Beam 18 Depth = 450 mm : Breadth = 225 mm : Cover = 25 mm : Bar dia = 16 : fcu = 25N/mm : fy = 410 N/mm : effectiveDepth, d = 409 mm Span 1 : Length = 1500 mm : Start Reaction = 15.35 KN : End Reaction = 15.35 KN : Span Moment = 21.72 KNm As Required = 143.52 mm : As Provided = 402 mm : Use = 2Y16 : Deflection Check Ok : Shear Check Ok : Use Y8 @ 300
Beam 19
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Page 59
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
Depth = 450 mm : Breadth = 225 mm : Cover = 25 mm : Bar dia = 16 : fcu = 25N/mm : fy = 410 N/mm : effectiveDepth, d = 409 mm Span 1 : Length = 3500 mm : Start Reaction = 39.67 KN : End Reaction = 39.67 KN : Span Moment = 113.1 KNm As Required = 843.94 mm : As Provided = 1005 mm : Use = 5Y16 : Deflection Check Ok : Shear Check Ok : Use Y8 @ 300
Beam 20 Depth = 450 mm : Breadth = 225 mm : Cover = 25 mm : Bar dia = 16 : fcu = 25N/mm : fy = 410 N/mm : effectiveDepth, d = 409 mm
Span 1 : Length = 3500 mm : Start Reaction = 39.67 KN : End Reaction = 39.67 KN : Span Moment = 87.28 KNm As Required = 620.25 mm : As Provided = 804 mm : Use = 4Y16 : Deflection Check Ok : Shear Check Ok : Use Y8 @ 300 Span 2 : Length = 3500 mm : Start Reaction = 39.67 KN : End Reaction = 39.67 KN : Span Moment = 435.77 KNm As Required = 3202.17 mm : As Provided = 3216 mm : Use = 16Y16 : Deflection Check Ok : Shear Check Ok : Use Y8 @ 300 Span 3 : Length = 2000 mm : Start Reaction = 21.01 KN : End Reaction = 21.01 KN : Span Moment = 670 KNm As Required = 4836.29 mm : As Provided = 5025 mm : Use = 25Y16 : Deflection Check Ok : Shear Check Ok : Use Y8 @ 300
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Page 60
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
Support 2 : Support Moment = -30.66 KNm : As Required = 201.6 mm : As Provided = 402 mm : Use = 2Y16 Support 3 : Support Moment = -16.83 KNm : As Required = 110.67 mm : As Provided = 201 mm : Use = 2Y16 Code reference - BS 8110 : Part 1 : 1997 : Section 3.4.4.4
4.2.3
Column Design
Column Type, CT 1 : Top Level = 12600 - Bottom Level = 0 Cover = 25 mm : fcu = 25N/mm : fy = 410 N/mm Level 1 : Top Level 12600 : Length = 3150 mm : Width = 225 mm : Height = 225 Axialload = 113.77 KN : Column Moment = 25.88 KNm : d/h = 0.818 : N/bhfcu = 0.0899 : M/bhfcu = 0.0909 As Required = 617.38 mm : As Provided = 804 mm : Use = 4Y16 : Link Use Y8 @ 250 Level 2 : Top Level 9450 : Length = 3150 mm : Width = 225 mm : Height = 225 Axialload = 263.52 KN : Column Moment = 25.7 KNm : d/h = 0.818 : N/bhfcu = 0.2082 : M/bhfcu = 0.0902 As Required = 30.87 mm : As Provided = 201 mm : Use = 4Y16 : Link Use Y8 @ 250 Level 3 : Top Level 6300 : Length = 3150 mm : Width = 225 mm : Height = 225 Axialload = 413.27 KN : Column Moment = 24.93 KNm : d/h = 0.818 : N/bhfcu = 0.3265 : M/bhfcu = 0.0875 As Required = 555.64 mm : As Provided = 603 mm : Use = 4Y16 : Link Use Y8 @ 250 Level 4 : Top Level 3150 : Length = 3150 mm : Width = 225 mm : Height = 225 Axialload = 563.02 KN : Column Moment = 24.16 KNm : d/h = 0.818 : N/bhfcu = 0.4449 :
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Page 61
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
M/bhfcu = 0.0848 As Required = 592.68 mm : As Provided = 603 mm : Use = 4Y16 : Link Use Y8 @ 250
Column Type, CT 2 : Top Level = 12600 - Bottom Level = 0 Cover = 25 mm : fcu = 25N/mm : fy = 410 N/mm Level 1 : Top Level 12600 : Length = 3150 mm : Width = 225 mm : Height = 225 Axialload = 134.66 KN : Column Moment = 28.48 KNm : d/h = 0.818 : N/bhfcu = 0.1064 : M/bhfcu = 0.1 As Required = 432.16 mm : As Provided = 603 mm : Use = 4Y16 : Link Use Y8 @ 250 Level 2 : Top Level 9450 : Length = 3150 mm : Width = 225 mm : Height = 225 Axialload = 294.97 KN : Column Moment = 28.21 KNm : d/h = 0.818 : N/bhfcu = 0.2331 : M/bhfcu = 0.0991 As Required = 401.3 mm : As Provided = 402 mm : Use = 4Y16 : Link Use Y8 @ 250 Level 3 : Top Level 6300 : Length = 3150 mm : Width = 225 mm : Height = 225 Axialload = 450.73 KN : Column Moment = 26.88 KNm : d/h = 0.818 : N/bhfcu = 0.3561 : M/bhfcu = 0.0944 As Required = 679.12 mm : As Provided = 804 mm : Use = 4Y16 : Link Use Y8 @ 250 Level 4 : Top Level 3150 : Length = 3150 mm : Width = 225 mm : Height = 225 Axialload = 606.49 KN : Column Moment = 25.55 KNm : d/h = 0.818 : N/bhfcu = 0.4792 : M/bhfcu = 0.0897 As Required = 802.59 mm : As Provided = 804 mm : Use = 4Y16 : Link Use Y8 @ 250
Page 62
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
Cover = 25 mm : fcu = 25N/mm : fy = 410 N/mm Level 1 : Top Level 12600 : Length = 3150 mm : Width = 225 mm : Height = 225 Axialload = 108.21 KN : Column Moment = 12.64 KNm : d/h = 0.818 : N/bhfcu = 0.0855 : M/bhfcu = 0.0444 As Required = 15.43 mm : As Provided = 201 mm : Use = 4Y16 : Link Use Y8 @ 250 Level 2 : Top Level 9450 : Length = 3150 mm : Width = 225 mm : Height = 225 Axialload = 235.57 KN : Column Moment = 13.76 KNm : d/h = 0.818 : N/bhfcu = 0.1861 : M/bhfcu = 0.0483 As Required = 3.09 mm : As Provided = 201 mm : Use = 4Y16 : Link Use Y8 @ 250 Level 3 : Top Level 6300 : Length = 3150 mm : Width = 225 mm : Height = 225 Axialload = 358.38 KN : Column Moment = 13.12 KNm : d/h = 0.818 : N/bhfcu = 0.2832 : M/bhfcu = 0.0461 As Required = 9.26 mm : As Provided = 201 mm : Use = 4Y16 : Link Use Y8 @ 250 Level 4 : Top Level 3150 : Length = 3150 mm : Width = 225 mm : Height = 225 Axialload = 481.19 KN : Column Moment = 12.48 KNm : d/h = 0.818 : N/bhfcu = 0.3802 : M/bhfcu = 0.0438 As Required = 30.87 mm : As Provided = 201 mm : Use = 4Y16 : Link Use Y8 @ 250
Column Type, CT 4 : Top Level = 12600 - Bottom Level = 0 Cover = 25 mm : fcu = 25N/mm : fy = 410 N/mm Level 1 : Top Level 12600 : Length = 3150 mm : Width = 225 mm : Height = 225 Axialload = 87.32 KN : Column Moment = 9.66 KNm : d/h = 0.818 : N/bhfcu = 0.069 : M/bhfcu = 0.0339
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Page 63
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
As Required = 0.31 mm : As Provided = 201 mm : Use = 4Y16 : Link Use Y8 @ 250 Level 2 : Top Level 9450 : Length = 3150 mm : Width = 225 mm : Height = 225 Axialload = 204.12 KN : Column Moment = 10.28 KNm : d/h = 0.818 : N/bhfcu = 0.1613 : M/bhfcu = 0.0361 As Required = 30.87 mm : As Provided = 201 mm : Use = 4Y16 : Link Use Y8 @ 250 Level 3 : Top Level 6300 : Length = 3150 mm : Width = 225 mm : Height = 225 Axialload = 320.92 KN : Column Moment = 9.67 KNm : d/h = 0.818 : N/bhfcu = 0.2536 : M/bhfcu = 0.034 As Required = 6.17 mm : As Provided = 201 mm : Use = 4Y16 : Link Use Y8 @ 250 Level 4 : Top Level 3150 : Length = 3150 mm : Width = 225 mm : Height = 225 Axialload = 437.72 KN : Column Moment = 9.06 KNm : d/h = 0.818 : N/bhfcu = 0.3459 : M/bhfcu = 0.0318 As Required = 3.4 mm : As Provided = 201 mm : Use = 4Y16 : Link Use Y8 @ 250
Column Type, CT 9 : Top Level = 12600 - Bottom Level = 0 Cover = 25 mm : fcu = 25N/mm : fy = 410 N/mm Level 1 : Top Level 12600 : Length = 3150 mm : Width = 225 mm : Height = 225 Axialload = 131.69 KN : Column Moment = 31.29 KNm : d/h = 0.818 : N/bhfcu = 0.1041 : M/bhfcu = 0.1099 As Required = 185.21 mm : As Provided = 201 mm : Use = 4Y16 : Link Use Y8 @ 250 Level 2 : Top Level 9450 : Length = 3150 mm : Width = 225 mm : Height = 225 Axialload = 300.11 KN : Column Moment = 33.57 KNm : d/h = 0.818 : N/bhfcu = 0.2371 : M/bhfcu = 0.1179
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Page 64
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
As Required = 246.95 mm : As Provided = 402 mm : Use = 4Y16 : Link Use Y8 @ 250 Level 3 : Top Level 6300 : Length = 3150 mm : Width = 225 mm : Height = 225 Axialload = 466.28 KN : Column Moment = 32.72 KNm : d/h = 0.818 : N/bhfcu = 0.3684 : M/bhfcu = 0.1149 As Required = 302.52 mm : As Provided = 402 mm : Use = 4Y16 : Link Use Y8 @ 250 Level 4 : Top Level 3150 : Length = 3150 mm : Width = 225 mm : Height = 225 Axialload = 632.45 KN : Column Moment = 31.86 KNm : d/h = 0.818 : N/bhfcu = 0.4997 : M/bhfcu = 0.1119 As Required = 277.82 mm : As Provided = 402 mm : Use = 4Y16 : Link Use Y8 @ 250
Column Type, CT 11 : Top Level = 12600 - Bottom Level = 0 Cover = 25 mm : fcu = 25N/mm : fy = 410 N/mm Level 1 : Top Level 12600 : Length = 3150 mm : Width = 225 mm : Height = 225 Axialload = 151.35 KN : Column Moment = 31.45 KNm : d/h = 0.818 : N/bhfcu = 0.1196 : M/bhfcu = 0.1104 As Required = 250.04 mm : As Provided = 402 mm : Use = 4Y16 : Link Use Y8 @ 250 Level 2 : Top Level 9450 : Length = 3150 mm : Width = 225 mm : Height = 225 Axialload = 338.61 KN : Column Moment = 34.25 KNm : d/h = 0.818 : N/bhfcu = 0.2675 : M/bhfcu = 0.1203 As Required = 305.6 mm : As Provided = 402 mm : Use = 4Y16 : Link Use Y8 @ 250 Level 3 : Top Level 6300 : Length = 3150 mm : Width = 225 mm : Height = 225 Axialload = 519.36 KN : Column Moment = 32.68 KNm : d/h = 0.818 : N/bhfcu = 0.4104 : M/bhfcu = 0.1148
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Page 65
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
As Required = 679.12 mm : As Provided = 804 mm : Use = 4Y16 : Link Use Y8 @ 250 Level 4 : Top Level 3150 : Length = 3150 mm : Width = 225 mm : Height = 225 Axialload = 700.11 KN : Column Moment = 31.11 KNm : d/h = 0.818 : N/bhfcu = 0.5532 : M/bhfcu = 0.1092 As Required = 617.38 mm : As Provided = 804 mm : Use = 4Y16 : Link Use Y8 @ 250
Column Type, CT 12 : Top Level = 12600 - Bottom Level = 0 Cover = 25 mm : fcu = 25N/mm : fy = 410 N/mm Level 1 : Top Level 12600 : Length = 3150 mm : Width = 225 mm : Height = 225 Axialload = 123.51 KN : Column Moment = 13.7 KNm : d/h = 0.818 : N/bhfcu = 0.0976 : M/bhfcu = 0.0481 As Required = 3.09 mm : As Provided = 201 mm : Use = 4Y16 : Link Use Y8 @ 250 Level 2 : Top Level 9450 : Length = 3150 mm : Width = 225 mm : Height = 225 Axialload = 267.83 KN : Column Moment = 15.3 KNm : d/h = 0.818 : N/bhfcu = 0.2116 : M/bhfcu = 0.0537 As Required = 3.09 mm : As Provided = 201 mm : Use = 4Y16 : Link Use Y8 @ 250 Level 3 : Top Level 6300 : Length = 3150 mm : Width = 225 mm : Height = 225 Axialload = 405.31 KN : Column Moment = 14.33 KNm : d/h = 0.818 : N/bhfcu = 0.3202 : M/bhfcu = 0.0503 As Required = 30.87 mm : As Provided = 201 mm : Use = 4Y16 : Link Use Y8 @ 250 Level 4 : Top Level 3150 : Length = 3150 mm : Width = 225 mm : Height = 225 Axialload = 542.79 KN : Column Moment = 13.36 KNm : d/h = 0.818 : N/bhfcu = 0.4289 : M/bhfcu = 0.0469
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Page 66
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
Column Type, CT 14 : Top Level = 12600 - Bottom Level = 0 Cover = 25 mm : fcu = 25N/mm : fy = 410 N/mm Level 1 : Top Level 12600 : Length = 3150 mm : Width = 225 mm : Height = 225 Axialload = 100.48 KN : Column Moment = 11.67 KNm : d/h = 0.818 : N/bhfcu = 0.0794 : M/bhfcu = 0.041 As Required = 6.17 mm : As Provided = 201 mm : Use = 4Y16 : Link Use Y8 @ 250 Level 2 : Top Level 9450 : Length = 3150 mm : Width = 225 mm : Height = 225 Axialload = 226.25 KN : Column Moment = 12.77 KNm : d/h = 0.818 : N/bhfcu = 0.1788 : M/bhfcu = 0.0448 As Required = 67.91 mm : As Provided = 201 mm : Use = 4Y16 : Link Use Y8 @ 250 Level 3 : Top Level 6300 : Length = 3150 mm : Width = 225 mm : Height = 225 Axialload = 350.08 KN : Column Moment = 12.12 KNm : d/h = 0.818 : N/bhfcu = 0.2766 : M/bhfcu = 0.0426 As Required = 64.82 mm : As Provided = 201 mm : Use = 4Y16 : Link Use Y8 @ 250
Level 4 : Top Level 3150 : Length = 3150 mm : Width = 225 mm : Height = 225 Axialload = 473.91 KN : Column Moment = 11.48 KNm : d/h = 0.818 : N/bhfcu = 0.3744 : M/bhfcu = 0.0403 As Required = 9.26 mm : As Provided = 201 mm : Use = 4Y16 : Link Use Y8 @ 250
Page 67
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
Cover = 25 mm : fcu = 25N/mm : fy = 410 N/mm Level 1 : Top Level 12600 : Length = 3150 mm : Width = 225 mm : Height = 225 Axialload = 136.14 KN : Column Moment = 38.76 KNm : d/h = 0.818 : N/bhfcu = 0.1076 : M/bhfcu = 0.1361 As Required = 833.46 mm : As Provided = 1005 mm : Use = 6Y16 : Link Use Y8 @ 250 Level 2 : Top Level 9450 : Length = 3150 mm : Width = 225 mm : Height = 225 Axialload = 316.24 KN : Column Moment = 41.01 KNm : d/h = 0.818 : N/bhfcu = 0.2499 : M/bhfcu = 0.144 As Required = 802.59 mm : As Provided = 804 mm : Use = 4Y16 : Link Use Y8 @ 250 Level 3 : Top Level 6300 : Length = 3150 mm : Width = 225 mm : Height = 225 Axialload = 494.54 KN : Column Moment = 40.12 KNm : d/h = 0.818 : N/bhfcu = 0.3907 : M/bhfcu = 0.1409 As Required = 895.2 mm : As Provided = 1005 mm : Use = 6Y16 : Link Use Y8 @ 250
Level 4 : Top Level 3150 : Length = 3150 mm : Width = 225 mm : Height = 225 Axialload = 672.84 KN : Column Moment = 39.23 KNm : d/h = 0.818 : N/bhfcu = 0.5316 : M/bhfcu = 0.1378 As Required = 922.98 mm : As Provided = 1005 mm : Use = 6Y16 : Link Use Y8 @ 250 Column Type, CT 17 : Top Level = 12600 - Bottom Level = 0 Cover = 25 mm : fcu = 25N/mm : fy = 410 N/mm Level 1 : Top Level 12600 : Length = 3150 mm : Width = 225 mm : Height = 225 Axialload = 225.41 KN : Column Moment = 49.27 KNm : d/h = 0.818 : N/bhfcu = 0.1781 : M/bhfcu = 0.173
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Page 68
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
As Required = 2006.48 mm : As Provided = 2010 mm : Use = 10Y16 : Link Use Y8 @ 250 Level 2 : Top Level 9450 : Length = 3150 mm : Width = 225 mm : Height = 225 Axialload = 600.78 KN : Column Moment = 64.84 KNm : d/h = 0.818 : N/bhfcu = 0.4747 : M/bhfcu = 0.2277 As Required = 6.17 mm : As Provided = 201 mm : Use = 4Y16 : Link Use Y8 @ 250 Level 3 : Top Level 6300 : Length = 3150 mm : Width = 225 mm : Height = 225 Axialload = 975.25 KN : Column Moment = 61.8 KNm : d/h = 0.818 : N/bhfcu = 0.7706 : M/bhfcu = 0.217 As Required = 1265.62 mm : As Provided = 1407 mm : Use = 8Y16 : Link Use Y8 @ 250 Level 4 : Top Level 3150 : Length = 3150 mm : Width = 225 mm : Height = 225 Axialload = 1349.72 KN : Column Moment = 58.76 KNm : d/h = 0.818 : N/bhfcu = 1.0664 : M/bhfcu = 0.2063 As Required = 2099.09 mm : As Provided = 2211 mm : Use = 12Y16 : Link Use Y8 @ 250
Column Type, CT 18 : Top Level = 12600 - Bottom Level = 0 Cover = 25 mm : fcu = 25N/mm : fy = 410 N/mm Level 1 : Top Level 12600 : Length = 3150 mm : Width = 225 mm : Height = 225 Axialload = 176.29 KN : Column Moment = 11.25 KNm : d/h = 0.818 : N/bhfcu = 0.1393 : M/bhfcu = 0.0395 As Required = 6.17 mm : As Provided = 201 mm : Use = 4Y16 : Link Use Y8 @ 250 Level 2 : Top Level 9450 : Length = 3150 mm : Width = 225 mm : Height = 225 Axialload = 458.82 KN : Column Moment = 14.65 KNm : d/h = 0.818 : N/bhfcu = 0.3625 : M/bhfcu = 0.0514
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Page 69
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
As Required = 123.48 mm : As Provided = 201 mm : Use = 4Y16 : Link Use Y8 @ 250 Level 3 : Top Level 6300 : Length = 3150 mm : Width = 225 mm : Height = 225 Axialload = 740.57 KN : Column Moment = 12.43 KNm : d/h = 0.818 : N/bhfcu = 0.5851 : M/bhfcu = 0.0436 As Required = 987.8 mm : As Provided = 1005 mm : Use = 6Y16 : Link Use Y8 @ 250 Level 4 : Top Level 3150 : Length = 3150 mm : Width = 225 mm : Height = 225 Axialload = 1022.32 KN : Column Moment = 10.2 KNm : d/h = 0.818 : N/bhfcu = 0.8078 : M/bhfcu = 0.0358 As Required = 1358.23 mm : As Provided = 1407 mm : Use = 8Y16 : Link Use Y8 @ 250
Column Type, CT 20 : Top Level = 12600 - Bottom Level = 0 Cover = 25 mm : fcu = 25N/mm : fy = 410 N/mm Level 1 : Top Level 12600 : Length = 3150 mm : Width = 225 mm : Height = 225 Axialload = 100.48 KN : Column Moment = 11.67 KNm : d/h = 0.818 : N/bhfcu = 0.0794 : M/bhfcu = 0.041 As Required = 6.17 mm : As Provided = 201 mm : Use = 4Y16 : Link Use Y8 @ 250 Level 2 : Top Level 9450 : Length = 3150 mm : Width = 225 mm : Height = 225 Axialload = 226.25 KN : Column Moment = 12.77 KNm : d/h = 0.818 : N/bhfcu = 0.1788 : M/bhfcu = 0.0448 As Required = 0.62 mm : As Provided = 201 mm : Use = 4Y16 : Link Use Y8 @ 250 Level 3 : Top Level 6300 : Length = 3150 mm : Width = 225 mm : Height = 225 Axialload = 350.08 KN : Column Moment = 12.12 KNm : d/h = 0.818 : N/bhfcu = 0.2766 : M/bhfcu = 0.0426
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Page 70
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
As Required = 3.09 mm : As Provided = 201 mm : Use = 4Y16 : Link Use Y8 @ 250 Level 4 : Top Level 3150 : Length = 3150 mm : Width = 225 mm : Height = 225 Axialload = 473.91 KN : Column Moment = 11.48 KNm : d/h = 0.818 : N/bhfcu = 0.3744 : M/bhfcu = 0.0403 As Required = 12.35 mm : As Provided = 201 mm : Use = 4Y16 : Link Use Y8 @ 250
Column Type, CT 21 : Top Level = 12600 - Bottom Level = 0 Cover = 25 mm : fcu = 25N/mm : fy = 410 N/mm Level 1 : Top Level 12600 : Length = 3150 mm : Width = 225 mm : Height = 225 Axialload = 157.97 KN : Column Moment = 7.09 KNm : d/h = 0.818 : N/bhfcu = 0.1248 : M/bhfcu = 0.0249 As Required = 3.09 mm : As Provided = 201 mm : Use = 4Y16 : Link Use Y8 @ 250 Level 2 : Top Level 9450 : Length = 3150 mm : Width = 225 mm : Height = 225 Axialload = 427.95 KN : Column Moment = 9.31 KNm : d/h = 0.818 : N/bhfcu = 0.3381 : M/bhfcu = 0.0327 As Required = 9.26 mm : As Provided = 201 mm : Use = 4Y16 : Link Use Y8 @ 250 Level 3 : Top Level 6300 : Length = 3150 mm : Width = 225 mm : Height = 225 Axialload = 697.93 KN : Column Moment = 8.74 KNm : d/h = 0.818 : N/bhfcu = 0.5515 : M/bhfcu = 0.0307 As Required = 246.95 mm : As Provided = 402 mm : Use = 4Y16 : Link Use Y8 @ 250
Level 4 : Top Level 3150 : Length = 3150 mm : Width = 225 mm : Height = 225 Axialload = 967.91 KN : Column Moment = 8.16 KNm : d/h = 0.818 : N/bhfcu = 0.7648 :
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Page 71
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
M/bhfcu = 0.0287 As Required = 1234.76 mm : As Provided = 1407 mm : Use = 8Y16 : Link Use Y8 @ 250
Column Type, CT 22 : Top Level = 12600 - Bottom Level = 0 Cover = 25 mm : fcu = 25N/mm : fy = 410 N/mm Level 1 : Top Level 12600 : Length = 3150 mm : Width = 225 mm : Height = 225 Axialload = 133.75 KN : Column Moment = 6.71 KNm : d/h = 0.818 : N/bhfcu = 0.1057 : M/bhfcu = 0.0236 As Required = 5.56 mm : As Provided = 201 mm : Use = 4Y16 : Link Use Y8 @ 250 Level 2 : Top Level 9450 : Length = 3150 mm : Width = 225 mm : Height = 225 Axialload = 326.45 KN : Column Moment = 8.76 KNm : d/h = 0.818 : N/bhfcu = 0.2579 : M/bhfcu = 0.0308 As Required = 6.17 mm : As Provided = 201 mm : Use = 4Y16 : Link Use Y8 @ 250 Level 3 : Top Level 6300 : Length = 3150 mm : Width = 225 mm : Height = 225 Axialload = 519.15 KN : Column Moment = 8.54 KNm : d/h = 0.818 : N/bhfcu = 0.4102 : M/bhfcu = 0.03 As Required = 3.09 mm : As Provided = 201 mm : Use = 4Y16 : Link Use Y8 @ 250 Level 4 : Top Level 3150 : Length = 3150 mm : Width = 225 mm : Height = 225 Axialload = 711.85 KN : Column Moment = 8.33 KNm : d/h = 0.818 : N/bhfcu = 0.5624 : M/bhfcu = 0.0293 As Required = 185.21 mm : As Provided = 201 mm : Use = 4Y16 : Link Use Y8 @ 250
Page 72
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
Cover = 25 mm : fcu = 25N/mm : fy = 410 N/mm Level 1 : Top Level 12600 : Length = 3150 mm : Width = 225 mm : Height = 225 Axialload = 149.51 KN : Column Moment = 13.23 KNm : d/h = 0.818 : N/bhfcu = 0.1181 : M/bhfcu = 0.0465 As Required = 9.26 mm : As Provided = 201 mm : Use = 4Y16 : Link Use Y8 @ 250 Level 2 : Top Level 9450 : Length = 3150 mm : Width = 225 mm : Height = 225 Axialload = 361.83 KN : Column Moment = 16.5 KNm : d/h = 0.818 : N/bhfcu = 0.2859 : M/bhfcu = 0.0579 As Required = 3.09 mm : As Provided = 201 mm : Use = 4Y16 : Link Use Y8 @ 250 Level 3 : Top Level 6300 : Length = 3150 mm : Width = 225 mm : Height = 225 Axialload = 574.15 KN : Column Moment = 15.59 KNm : d/h = 0.818 : N/bhfcu = 0.4536 : M/bhfcu = 0.0547 As Required = 27.78 mm : As Provided = 201 mm : Use = 4Y16 : Link Use Y8 @ 250 Level 4 : Top Level 3150 : Length = 3150 mm : Width = 225 mm : Height = 225 Axialload = 786.47 KN : Column Moment = 14.69 KNm : d/h = 0.818 : N/bhfcu = 0.6214 : M/bhfcu = 0.0516 As Required = 1265.62 mm : As Provided = 1407 mm : Use = 8Y16 : Link Use Y8 @ 250
Column Type, CT 24 : Top Level = 12600 - Bottom Level = 0 Cover = 25 mm : fcu = 25N/mm : fy = 410 N/mm Level 1 : Top Level 12600 : Length = 3150 mm : Width = 225 mm : Height = 225 Axialload = 246.6 KN : Column Moment = 18.02 KNm : d/h = 0.818 : N/bhfcu = 0.1948 : M/bhfcu = 0.0633
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Page 73
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
As Required = 123.48 mm : As Provided = 201 mm : Use = 4Y16 : Link Use Y8 @ 250 Level 2 : Top Level 9450 : Length = 3150 mm : Width = 225 mm : Height = 225 Axialload = 663.6 KN : Column Moment = 25.99 KNm : d/h = 0.818 : N/bhfcu = 0.5243 : M/bhfcu = 0.0913 As Required = 117.3 mm : As Provided = 201 mm : Use = 4Y16 : Link Use Y8 @ 250 Level 3 : Top Level 6300 : Length = 3150 mm : Width = 225 mm : Height = 225 Axialload = 1080.6 KN : Column Moment = 22.27 KNm : d/h = 0.818 : N/bhfcu = 0.8538 : M/bhfcu = 0.0782 As Required = 2006.48 mm : As Provided = 2010 mm : Use = 10Y16 : Link Use Y8 @ 250 Level 4 : Top Level 3150 : Length = 3150 mm : Width = 225 mm : Height = 225 Axialload = 1497.6 KN : Column Moment = 18.54 KNm : d/h = 0.818 : N/bhfcu = 1.1833 : M/bhfcu = 0.0651 As Required = 3704.27 mm : As Provided = 3819 mm : Use = 20Y16 : Link Use Y8 @ 250 Column Type, CT 25 : Top Level = 12600 - Bottom Level = 0 Cover = 25 mm : fcu = 25N/mm : fy = 410 N/mm Level 1 : Top Level 12600 : Length = 3150 mm : Width = 225 mm : Height = 225 Axialload = 175.87 KN : Column Moment = 11.67 KNm : d/h = 0.818 : N/bhfcu = 0.139 : M/bhfcu = 0.041 As Required = 3.7 mm : As Provided = 201 mm : Use = 4Y16 : Link Use Y8 @ 250 Level 2 : Top Level 9450 : Length = 3150 mm : Width = 225 mm : Height = 225 Axialload = 470.11 KN : Column Moment = 15.02 KNm : d/h = 0.818 : N/bhfcu = 0.3714 : M/bhfcu = 0.0527 As Required = 33.96 mm : As Provided = 201 mm : Use = 4Y16 : Link Use Y8 @ 250
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Page 74
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
Level 3 : Top Level 6300 : Length = 3150 mm : Width = 225 mm : Height = 225 Axialload = 764.35 KN : Column Moment = 12.48 KNm : d/h = 0.818 : N/bhfcu = 0.6039 : M/bhfcu = 0.0438 As Required = 740.85 mm : As Provided = 804 mm : Use = 4Y16 : Link Use Y8 @ 250 Level 4 : Top Level 3150 : Length = 3150 mm : Width = 225 mm : Height = 225 Axialload = 1058.59 KN : Column Moment = 9.93 KNm : d/h = 0.818 : N/bhfcu = 0.8364 : M/bhfcu = 0.0349 As Required = 1419.97 mm : As Provided = 1608 mm : Use = 8Y16 : Link Use Y8 @ 250
Column Type, CT 26 : Top Level = 12600 - Bottom Level = 0 Cover = 25 mm : fcu = 25N/mm : fy = 410 N/mm Level 1 : Top Level 12600 : Length = 3150 mm : Width = 225 mm : Height = 225 Axialload = 114.11 KN : Column Moment = 7.26 KNm : d/h = 0.818 : N/bhfcu = 0.0902 : M/bhfcu = 0.0255 As Required = 3.09 mm : As Provided = 201 mm : Use = 4Y16 : Link Use Y8 @ 250 Level 2 : Top Level 9450 : Length = 3150 mm : Width = 225 mm : Height = 225 Axialload = 275.15 KN : Column Moment = 9.22 KNm : d/h = 0.818 : N/bhfcu = 0.2174 : M/bhfcu = 0.0324 As Required = 6.17 mm : As Provided = 201 mm : Use = 4Y16 : Link Use Y8 @ 250 Level 3 : Top Level 6300 : Length = 3150 mm : Width = 225 mm : Height = 225 Axialload = 436.19 KN : Column Moment = 8.9 KNm : d/h = 0.818 : N/bhfcu = 0.3446 :
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Page 75
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
M/bhfcu = 0.0313 As Required = 12.35 mm : As Provided = 201 mm : Use = 4Y16 : Link Use Y8 @ 250 Level 4 : Top Level 3150 : Length = 3150 mm : Width = 225 mm : Height = 225 Axialload = 597.23 KN : Column Moment = 8.57 KNm : d/h = 0.818 : N/bhfcu = 0.4719 : M/bhfcu = 0.0301 As Required = 246.95 mm : As Provided = 402 mm : Use = 4Y16 : Link Use Y8 @ 250
Column Type, CT 27 : Top Level = 12600 - Bottom Level = 0 Cover = 25 mm : fcu = 25N/mm : fy = 410 N/mm Level 1 : Top Level 12600 : Length = 3150 mm : Width = 225 mm : Height = 225 Axialload = 61.43 KN : Column Moment = 4.03 KNm : d/h = 0.818 : N/bhfcu = 0.0485 : M/bhfcu = 0.0142 As Required = 3.7 mm : As Provided = 201 mm : Use = 4Y16 : Link Use Y8 @ 250 Level 2 : Top Level 9450 : Length = 3150 mm : Width = 225 mm : Height = 225 Axialload = 136.89 KN : Column Moment = 4.27 KNm : d/h = 0.818 : N/bhfcu = 0.1082 : M/bhfcu = 0.015 As Required = 3.4 mm : As Provided = 201 mm : Use = 4Y16 : Link Use Y8 @ 250 Level 3 : Top Level 6300 : Length = 3150 mm : Width = 225 mm : Height = 225 Axialload = 212.35 KN : Column Moment = 4.2 KNm : d/h = 0.818 : N/bhfcu = 0.1678 : M/bhfcu = 0.0147 As Required = 46.3 mm : As Provided = 201 mm : Use = 4Y16 : Link Use Y8 @ 250 Level 4 : Top Level 3150 : Length = 3150 mm : Width = 225 mm : Height = 225 Axialload = 287.81 KN : Column Moment = 4.12 KNm : d/h = 0.818 : N/bhfcu = 0.2274 :
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Page 76
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
M/bhfcu = 0.0145 As Required = 0.31 mm : As Provided = 201 mm : Use = 4Y16 : Link Use Y8 @ 250
Column Type, CT 28 : Top Level = 12600 - Bottom Level = 0 Cover = 25 mm : fcu = 25N/mm : fy = 410 N/mm Level 1 : Top Level 12600 : Length = 3150 mm : Width = 225 mm : Height = 225 Axialload = 158.7 KN : Column Moment = 19.7 KNm : d/h = 0.818 : N/bhfcu = 0.1254 : M/bhfcu = 0.0692 As Required = 154.34 mm : As Provided = 201 mm : Use = 4Y16 : Link Use Y8 @ 250 Level 2 : Top Level 9450 : Length = 3150 mm : Width = 225 mm : Height = 225 Axialload = 367.3 KN : Column Moment = 22.66 KNm : d/h = 0.818 : N/bhfcu = 0.2902 : M/bhfcu = 0.0796 As Required = 148.17 mm : As Provided = 201 mm : Use = 4Y16 : Link Use Y8 @ 250 Level 3 : Top Level 6300 : Length = 3150 mm : Width = 225 mm : Height = 225 Axialload = 575.9 KN : Column Moment = 22.41 KNm : d/h = 0.818 : N/bhfcu = 0.455 : M/bhfcu = 0.0787 As Required = 771.72 mm : As Provided = 804 mm : Use = 4Y16 : Link Use Y8 @ 250 Level 4 : Top Level 3150 : Length = 3150 mm : Width = 225 mm : Height = 225 Axialload = 784.5 KN : Column Moment = 22.16 KNm : d/h = 0.818 : N/bhfcu = 0.6199 : M/bhfcu = 0.0778 As Required = 1296.49 mm : As Provided = 1407 mm : Use = 8Y16 : Link Use Y8 @ 250
Page 77
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
Cover = 25 mm : fcu = 25N/mm : fy = 410 N/mm Level 1 : Top Level 12600 : Length = 3150 mm : Width = 225 mm : Height = 225 Axialload = 124.06 KN : Column Moment = 56.13 KNm : d/h = 0.818 : N/bhfcu = 0.098 : M/bhfcu = 0.1971 As Required = 1883 mm : As Provided = 2010 mm : Use = 10Y16 : Link Use Y8 @ 250 Level 2 : Top Level 9450 : Length = 3150 mm : Width = 225 mm : Height = 225 Axialload = 283.99 KN : Column Moment = 52.94 KNm : d/h = 0.818 : N/bhfcu = 0.2244 : M/bhfcu = 0.1859 As Required = 1481.71 mm : As Provided = 1608 mm : Use = 8Y16 : Link Use Y8 @ 250 Level 3 : Top Level 6300 : Length = 3150 mm : Width = 225 mm : Height = 225 Axialload = 443.92 KN : Column Moment = 52.79 KNm : d/h = 0.818 : N/bhfcu = 0.3508 : M/bhfcu = 0.1854 As Required = 1907.7 mm : As Provided = 2010 mm : Use = 10Y16 : Link Use Y8 @ 250 Level 4 : Top Level 3150 : Length = 3150 mm : Width = 225 mm : Height = 225 Axialload = 603.85 KN : Column Moment = 52.63 KNm : d/h = 0.818 : N/bhfcu = 0.4771 : M/bhfcu = 0.1848 As Required = 2129.95 mm : As Provided = 2211 mm : Use = 12Y16 : Link Use Y8 @ 250 Code reference - BS 8110 : Part 1 : 1997 : Section 3.8.4
4.2.4
Foundation Design
Cover = 50 mm : Bar dia = 12 : fcu = 25N/mm : fy = 410 N/mm Base Type, BT 1 : Base Thickness = 400mm : Width = 1600mm : Height = 1600 : effectiveDepth, d = 338 mm
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Page 78
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
MomentX = 51.99KNm : As required = 408.44mm : As provided = 566 : Use Y12 @ 200 : Punching Shear Check Ok MomentY = 51.99KNm : As required = 408.44mm : As provided = 566 : Use Y12 @ 200 : Punching Shear Check Ok Base Type, BT 2 : Base Thickness = 400mm : Width = 1800mm : Height = 1800 : effectiveDepth, d = 338 mm MomentX = 58.05KNm : As required = 456.05mm : As provided = 566 : Use Y12 @ 200 : Punching Shear Check Ok MomentY = 58.05KNm : As required = 456.05mm : As provided = 566 : Use Y12 @ 200 : Punching Shear Check Ok
Base Type, BT 3 : Base Thickness = 400mm : Width = 1600mm : Height = 1600 : effectiveDepth, d = 338 mm MomentX = 44.42KNm : As required = 348.97mm : As provided = 566 : Use Y12 @ 200 : Punching Shear Check Ok MomentY = 44.42KNm : As required = 348.97mm : As provided = 566 : Use Y12 @ 200 : Punching Shear Check Ok
Base Type, BT 4 : Base Thickness = 400mm : Width = 1400mm : Height = 1400 : effectiveDepth, d = 338 mm MomentX = 38.55KNm : As required = 302.86mm : As provided = 566 : Use Y12 @ 200 : Punching Shear Check Ok MomentY = 38.55KNm : As required = 302.86mm : As provided = 566 : Use Y12 @ 200 :
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Page 79
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
Base Type, BT 5 : Base Thickness = 400mm : Width = 1600mm : Height = 1600 : effectiveDepth, d = 338 mm MomentX = 58.4KNm : As required = 458.8mm : As provided = 566 : Use Y12 @ 200 : Punching Shear Check Ok MomentY = 58.4KNm : As required = 458.8mm : As provided = 566 : Use Y12 @ 200 : Punching Shear Check Ok
Base Type, BT 6 : Base Thickness = 400mm : Width = 1800mm : Height = 1800 : effectiveDepth, d = 338 mm MomentX = 67.02KNm : As required = 526.52mm : As provided = 566 : Use Y12 @ 200 : Punching Shear Check Ok MomentY = 67.02KNm : As required = 526.52mm : As provided = 566 : Use Y12 @ 200 : Punching Shear Check Ok
Base Type, BT 7 : Base Thickness = 400mm : Width = 1450mm : Height = 1450 : effectiveDepth, d = 338 mm MomentX = 48.43KNm : As required = 380.47mm : As provided = 566 : Use Y12 @ 200 : Punching Shear Check Ok MomentY = 48.43KNm : As required = 380.47mm : As provided = 566 : Use Y12 @ 200 : Punching Shear Check Ok
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Page 80
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
Base Type, BT 8 : Base Thickness = 400mm : Width = 1400mm : Height = 1400 : effectiveDepth, d = 338 mm MomentX = 41.73KNm : As required = 327.84mm : As provided = 566 : Use Y12 @ 200 : Punching Shear Check Ok MomentY = 41.73KNm : As required = 327.84mm : As provided = 566 : Use Y12 @ 200 : Punching Shear Check Ok Base Type, BT 9 : Base Thickness = 400mm : Width = 1600mm : Height = 1600 : effectiveDepth, d = 338 mm MomentX = 62.13KNm : As required = 488.1mm : As provided = 566 : Use Y12 @ 200 : Punching Shear Check Ok MomentY = 62.13KNm : As required = 488.1mm : As provided = 566 : Use Y12 @ 200 : Punching Shear Check Ok
Base Type, BT 10 : Base Thickness = 400mm : Width = 2000mm : Height = 2000 : effectiveDepth, d = 338 mm MomentX = 132.92KNm : As required = 1047.22mm : As provided = 1130 : Use Y12 @ 100 : Punching Shear Check Not Ok MomentY = 132.92KNm : As required = 1047.22mm : As provided = 1130 : Use Y12 @ 100 : Punching Shear Check Not Ok
Base Type, BT 11 : Base Thickness = 400mm : Width = 2400mm : Height = 2400 : effectiveDepth, d = 338 mm MomentX = 104.98KNm : As required = 824.74mm : As provided = 905 : Use Y12 @ 125 :
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Page 81
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
Punching Shear Check Ok MomentY = 104.98KNm : As required = 824.74mm : As provided = 905 : Use Y12 @ 125 : Punching Shear Check Ok
Base Type, BT 12 : Base Thickness = 400mm : Width = 1400mm : Height = 1400 : effectiveDepth, d = 338 mm MomentX = 41.73KNm : As required = 327.84mm : As provided = 566 : Use Y12 @ 200 : Punching Shear Check Ok MomentY = 41.73KNm : As required = 327.84mm : As provided = 566 : Use Y12 @ 200 : Punching Shear Check Ok
Base Type, BT 13 : Base Thickness = 400mm : Width = 2200mm : Height = 2200 : effectiveDepth, d = 338 mm MomentX = 97.52KNm : As required = 766.13mm : As provided = 905 : Use Y12 @ 125 : Punching Shear Check Ok MomentY = 97.52KNm : As required = 766.13mm : As provided = 905 : Use Y12 @ 125 : Punching Shear Check Ok
Base Type, BT 14 : Base Thickness = 400mm : Width = 2000mm : Height = 2000 : effectiveDepth, d = 338 mm MomentX = 70.09KNm : As required = 550.64mm : As provided = 566 : Use Y12 @ 200 : Punching Shear Check Ok MomentY = 70.09KNm : As required = 550.64mm : As provided = 566 : Use Y12 @ 200 :
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Page 82
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
Base Type, BT 15 : Base Thickness = 400mm : Width = 1600mm : Height = 1600 : effectiveDepth, d = 338 mm MomentX = 72.62KNm : As required = 570.51mm : As provided = 646 : Use Y12 @ 175 : Punching Shear Check Ok MomentY = 72.62KNm : As required = 570.51mm : As provided = 646 : Use Y12 @ 175 : Punching Shear Check Ok Base Type, BT 16 : Base Thickness = 500mm : Width = 1600mm : Height = 1600 : effectiveDepth, d = 438 mm MomentX = 138.27KNm : As required = 841.62mm : As provided = 905 : Use Y12 @ 125 : Punching Shear Check Ok MomentY = 138.27KNm : As required = 841.62mm : As provided = 905 : Use Y12 @ 125 : Punching Shear Check Ok
Base Type, BT 17 : Base Thickness = 500mm : Width = 1600mm : Height = 1600 : effectiveDepth, d = 438 mm MomentX = 97.75KNm : As required = 594.98mm : As provided = 754 : Use Y12 @ 150 : Punching Shear Check Ok MomentY = 97.75KNm : As required = 594.98mm : As provided = 754 : Use Y12 @ 150 : Punching Shear Check Ok
Page 83
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
effectiveDepth, d = 338 mm MomentX = 55.14KNm : As required = 433.19mm : As provided = 566 : Use Y12 @ 200 : Punching Shear Check Ok MomentY = 55.14KNm : As required = 433.19mm : As provided = 566 : Use Y12 @ 200 : Punching Shear Check Ok
Base Type, BT 19 : Base Thickness = 400mm : Width = 1600mm : Height = 1600 : effectiveDepth, d = 338 mm MomentX = 26.58KNm : As required = 208.82mm : As provided = 566 : Use Y12 @ 200 : Punching Shear Check Ok MomentY = 26.58KNm : As required = 208.82mm : As provided = 566 : Use Y12 @ 200 : Punching Shear Check Ok
Base Type, BT 20 : Base Thickness = 400mm : Width = 1600mm : Height = 1600 : effectiveDepth, d = 338 mm MomentX = 72.44KNm : As required = 569.1mm : As provided = 646 : Use Y12 @ 175 : Punching Shear Check Ok MomentY = 72.44KNm : As required = 569.1mm : As provided = 646 : Use Y12 @ 175 : Punching Shear Check Ok
Base Type, BT 21 : Base Thickness = 400mm : Width = 1600mm : Height = 1600 : effectiveDepth, d = 338 mm MomentX = 55.76KNm : As required = 438.06mm : As provided = 566 : Use Y12 @ 200 :
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Page 84
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
Punching Shear Check Ok MomentY = 55.76KNm : As required = 438.06mm : As provided = 566 : Use Y12 @ 200 : Punching Shear Check Ok
4.3.0 4.3.1
Design and Analysis Using RCD 2000 Slab Analysis and Design
fy = 410.0N/sq. mm.
lx = 3000.mm.
ly =
3500.mm.
ly/lx = 1.167
Page 85
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
Short Span Coeff. -0.058 & 0.043 Long Span Coeff. -0.047 & 0.035 Uniformly Distributed Load = 10.520kN/m. SHORT SPAN ^^^^^^^^^^ Section Moment (kN.m) Steel (sq. mm) PROVIDE
Span
4.09
Cont. Edge
5.46
LONG SPAN ^^^^^^^^^^ Section Moment (kN.m) Steel (sq. mm) Span Cont. Edge 3.31 4.45 PROVIDE
Equivqlent Udl on Beam = 11.916 kN/m *Torsional Bars. if any. is 375.000 sq. mm Provide Y12. @ 250.mm c/c T DEFLECTION ^^^^^^^^^^ Span/Depth = **** %As = 0.16 Fs = 273.5 Mod. Factor = 2.00
Page 86
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
Panel 2 of 11 Panel No. P2 Sketch: lx = 2000.mm. ly = Type: Two Way Case 2 Depth: 150.00 mm 2100.mm. ly/lx = 1.050
Short Span Coeff. -0.040 & 0.030 Long Span Coeff. -0.037 & 0.028 Uniformly Distributed Load = 10.520kN/m. SHORT SPAN ^^^^^^^^^^ Section Moment (kN.m) Steel (sq. mm) Span 1.27 PROVIDE
Cont. Edge
1.69
Equivqlent Udl on Beam = 7.013 kN/m LONG SPAN ^^^^^^^^^^ Section Moment (kN.m) Steel (sq. mm) Span Cont. Edge 1.18 1.56 PROVIDE
Equivqlent Udl on Beam = 7.339 kN/m *Torsional Bars. if any. is 375.000 sq. mm Provide Y12. @ 250.mm c/c T
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Page 87
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
DEFLECTION ^^^^^^^^^^ Span/Depth = **** %As = 0.16 Fs = 273.5 Mod. Factor = 2.00
Panel 3 of 11 Panel No. P3 Sketch: Span Length Span UDL Type: Simply Supported Depth: 225.00 mm = 9600.mm. = 10.520kN/m.
Steel Required = 2200.00sq. mm Provide Y20. @ 125.mm c/c Btm Left Shear on Beam/Wall = 50.50kN/m Right Shear on Beam/Wall = 50.50kN/m DEFLECTION ^^^^^^^^^^ Span/Depth = 20.0 %As = 1.10 Fs = 230.3 Mod. Factor = 1.07
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Page 88
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
Panel 4 of 11 Panel No. P4 Sketch: lx = 3500.mm. ly = Type: Two Way Case 4 Depth: 150.00 mm 3500.mm. ly/lx = 1.000
Short Span Coeff. -0.047 & 0.035 Long Span Coeff. -0.047 & 0.035 Uniformly Distributed Load = 10.520kN/m. SHORT SPAN ^^^^^^^^^^ Section Moment (kN.m) Steel (sq. mm) Span Cont. Edge 4.55 6.04 PROVIDE
Equivqlent Udl on Beam = 12.273 kN/m LONG SPAN ^^^^^^^^^^ Section Moment (kN.m) Steel (sq. mm) Span Cont. Edge 4.51 6.06 PROVIDE
Equivqlent Udl on Beam = 12.273 kN/m *Torsional Bars. if any. is 375.000 sq. mm Provide Y12. @ 250.mm c/c T DEFLECTION ^^^^^^^^^^
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Page 89
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
Panel 5 of 11 Panel No. P5 Sketch: Span Length Span UDL Type: Simply Supported Depth: 175.00 mm = 7000.mm. = 10.520kN/m.
Steel Required = 2300.30sq. mm Provide Y20. @ 125.mm c/c Btm Left Shear on Beam/Wall = 36.82kN/m Right Shear on Beam/Wall = 36.82kN/m
DEFLECTION ^^^^^^^^^^ Span/Depth = 20.0 %As = 1.53 Fs = 154.2 Mod. Factor = 1.26
Panel 6 of 11
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Page 90
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
Short Span Coeff. -0.038 & 0.028 Long Span Coeff. -0.037 & 0.028 Uniformly Distributed Load = 10.520kN/m. SHORT SPAN ^^^^^^^^^^ Section Moment (kN.m) Steel (sq. mm) Span Cont. Edge 3.66 4.86 PROVIDE
Equivqlent Udl on Beam = 12.273 kN/m LONG SPAN ^^^^^^^^^^ Section Moment (kN.m) Steel (sq. mm) Span Cont. Edge 3.61 4.77 PROVIDE
Equivqlent Udl on Beam = 12.273 kN/m *Torsional Bars. if any. is 375.000 sq. mm Provide Y12. @ 250.mm c/c T DEFLECTION ^^^^^^^^^^ Span/Depth = **** %As = 0.16 Fs = 273.5 Mod. Factor = 2.00
Page 91
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
Panel 7 of 11 Panel No. P7 Sketch: lx = 5100.mm. ly = Type: Two Way Case 1 Depth: 150.00 mm 7000.mm. ly/lx = 1.373
Short Span Coeff. -0.049 & 0.038 Long Span Coeff. -0.032 & 0.024 Uniformly Distributed Load = 10.520kN/m. SHORT SPAN ^^^^^^^^^^ Section Moment (kN.m) Steel (sq. mm) Span Cont. Edge 10.34 13.50 PROVIDE
Equivqlent Udl on Beam = 17.884 kN/m LONG SPAN ^^^^^^^^^^ Section Moment (kN.m) Steel (sq. mm) PROVIDE
6.57 8.76
Equivqlent Udl on Beam = 22.079 kN/m *Torsional Bars. if any. is 375.000 sq. mm Provide Y12. @ 250.mm c/c T
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Page 92
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
DEFLECTION ^^^^^^^^^^ Span/Depth = **** %As = 0.18 Fs = 273.5 Mod. Factor = 1.64
Panel 8 of 11 Panel No. P8 Sketch: lx = 3500.mm. ly = Type: Two Way Case 2 Depth: 150.00 mm 3500.mm. ly/lx = 1.000
Short Span Coeff. -0.038 & 0.028 Long Span Coeff. -0.037 & 0.028 Uniformly Distributed Load = 10.520kN/m. SHORT SPAN ^^^^^^^^^^ Section Moment (kN.m) Steel (sq. mm) Span Cont. Edge 3.66 4.86 PROVIDE
LONG SPAN ^^^^^^^^^^ Section Moment (kN.m) Steel (sq. mm) Span 3.61 PROVIDE
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
Cont. Edge
4.77
Equivqlent Udl on Beam = 12.273 kN/m *Torsional Bars. if any. is 375.000 sq. mm Provide Y12. @ 250.mm c/c T DEFLECTION ^^^^^^^^^^ Span/Depth = **** %As = 0.16 Fs = 273.5 Mod. Factor = 2.00
Panel 9 of 11 Panel No. P9 Sketch: Span Length Span UDL Type: Simply Supported Depth: 200.00 mm = 8600.mm. = 10.520kN/m.
Steel Required = 2130.20sq. mm Provide Y20. @ 125.mm c/c Btm Left Shear on Beam/Wall = 45.24kN/m Right Shear on Beam/Wall = 45.24kN/m DEFLECTION ^^^^^^^^^^
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Page 94
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
Panel 10 of 11 Panel No. P10 Sketch: lx = 2000.mm. ly = Type: Two Way Case 4 Depth: 150.00 mm 3000.mm. ly/lx = 1.500
Short Span Coeff. -0.075 & 0.056 Long Span Coeff. -0.047 & 0.035 Uniformly Distributed Load = 10.520kN/m. SHORT SPAN ^^^^^^^^^^ Section Moment (kN.m) Steel (sq. mm) Span Cont. Edge 2.37 3.16 PROVIDE
Equivqlent Udl on Beam = 7.013 kN/m LONG SPAN ^^^^^^^^^^ Section Moment (kN.m) Steel (sq. mm) Span Cont. Edge 1.47 1.98 PROVIDE
Equivqlent Udl on Beam = 8.961 kN/m *Torsional Bars. if any. is 375.000 sq. mm
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Page 95
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
Provide Y12. @ 250.mm c/c T DEFLECTION ^^^^^^^^^^ Span/Depth = **** %As = 0.16 Fs = 273.5 Mod. Factor = 2.00
Panel 11 of 11 Panel No. P11 Sketch: lx = 3000.mm. ly = Type: Two Way Case 2 Depth: 150.00 mm 3500.mm. ly/lx = 1.167
Short Span Coeff. -0.046 & 0.034 Long Span Coeff. -0.037 & 0.028 Uniformly Distributed Load = 10.520kN/m. SHORT SPAN ^^^^^^^^^^ Section Moment (kN.m) Steel (sq. mm) Span Cont. Edge 3.26 4.31 PROVIDE
PROVIDE
Page 96
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
2.65 3.50
Equivqlent Udl on Beam = 11.916 kN/m *Torsional Bars. if any. is 375.000 sq. mm Provide Y12. @ 250.mm c/c T DEFLECTION ^^^^^^^^^^ Span/Depth = **** %As = 0.16 Fs = 273.5 Mod. Factor = 2.00
4.3.2
Beam Analysis and Design Job Ref: BEAM DESIGN Designed: Samaila Sani Saulawa Beam Id: BM1 fcu = 25.0N/sq. mm Mu = 113.724kN. m. Date : August, 2012 Checked: __Engr. Samaila Bawa__
A. M O M E N T S ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Span Reinforcements ------------------Span Length S/N Moment (mm) Steel (Sq. mm) Bottom Top
Page 97
Provide
(kN. m)
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
1 -4
6000.
0.0
122.
122.
3 - Y16mm
Support Reinforcements ---------------------Supt Reaction Moment S/N 1 4 62. 1. (kN) 185.2 0.0 B. Steel (Sq. mm) Top Bottom T T Provide
SHEAR
*NOTE*: Spacing Based on 2 Legs 10mm Dia. Bar with fy = 250.0 N/sq. mm INPUT LISTING ------------Beam No. 1: BM1 Number of Supports = 2 Number of Spans = 1
Initial Beam Sizes are: H = 410.0 B = 225.0 Bf = 750.0 Hf = 150.0 First Support Cantilever load and Moment are: Last Support Cantilever load and Moment are: Beam Loads are: Member Span Udl Triang. Trapez. & Dist. No. of Point Loads
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Page 98
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
0.0
0.
Beam 2 of 20 Beam Id: BM2 fcu = 25.0N/sq. mm Mu = 113.724kN. m. Size: 410. BY 225. mm fy = 410.0N/sq. mm Flange width = 750.mm
A. M O M E N T S ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Span Reinforcements ------------------------Span Length S/N 5 -7 3500. Moment (mm) -40.4 Steel (Sq. mm) Bottom 304. Top B Provide
(kN. m) 122.
3 - Y16mm
Support Reinforcements -----------------------------Supt Reaction Moment S/N 5 7 51. -14. (kN) 113.1 0.0 B. Steel (Sq. mm) Top Bottom T T Provide
SHEAR
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
5 -7 51. 270. R10 @ 250.mm c/c -14. 270. R10 @ 250.mm c/c *NOTE*: Spacing Based on 2 Legs 10mm Dia. Bar with fy = 250.0 N/sq. mm INPUT LISTING ---------------------Beam No. 2: BM2 Number of Supports = 2 Number of Spans = 1
Initial Beam Sizes are: H = 410.0 B = 225.0 Bf = 750.0 Hf = 150.0 First Support Cantilever load and Moment are: Last Support Cantilever load and Moment are: Beam Loads are: Member Span Udl Triang. Trapez. & Dist. No. of Point Loads 5 -7 3500. 10.5 0.0 0.0 0. 0 0.0kN. & 113.1kN. m. 0.0kN. & 0.0kN. m.
Beam 3 of 20 Beam Id: BM3 fcu = 25.0N/sq. mm Mu = 140.400kN. m. Size: 450. BY 225. mm fy = 410.0N/sq. mm Flange width = 750.mm
Page 100
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
------------------Span Length S/N 4 -5 2100. Moment (mm) -14.9 Steel (Sq. mm) Bottom 135. Top B Provide
(kN. m) 135.
3 - Y16mm
Support Reinforcements ---------------------Supt Reaction Moment S/N 4 5 31. -9. (kN) 41.5 0.0 B. Steel (Sq. mm) Top Bottom T T Provide
SHEAR
*NOTE*: Spacing Based on 2 Legs 10mm Dia. Bar with fy = 250.0 N/sq. mm INPUT LISTING ------------Beam No. 3: BM3 Number of Supports = 2 Number of Spans = 1
Initial Beam Sizes are: H = 450.0 B = 225.0 Bf = 750.0 Hf = 150.0 First Support Cantilever load and Moment are: 0.0kN. & 41.5kN. m.
Page 101
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
Last Support Cantilever load and Moment are: Beam Loads are:
0.0kN. &
0.0kN. m.
Member Span Udl Triang. Trapez. & Dist. No. of Point Loads 4 -5 2100. 10.5 0.0 0.0 0. 0
Beam 4 of 20 Beam Id: BM4 fcu = 25.0N/sq. mm Mu = 140.400kN. m. Size: 450. BY 225. mm fy = 410.0N/sq. mm Flange width = 750.mm
A. M O M E N T S ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Span Reinforcements ------------------Span Length S/N 4 -5 2100. Moment (mm) -14.9 Steel (Sq. mm) Bottom 135. Top B Provide
(kN. m) 135.
3 - Y16mm
Support Reinforcements ---------------------Supt Reaction Moment S/N 4 5 31. -9. (kN) 41.5 0.0 Steel (Sq. mm) Top Bottom T T
Page 102
Provide
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
B.
SHEAR
*NOTE*: Spacing Based on 2 Legs 10mm Dia. Bar with fy = 250.0 N/sq. mm INPUT LISTING ------------Beam No. 4: BM4 Number of Supports = 2 Number of Spans = 1
Initial Beam Sizes are: H = 450.0 B = 225.0 Bf = 750.0 Hf = 150.0 First Support Cantilever load and Moment are: Last Support Cantilever load and Moment are: Beam Loads are: Member Span Udl Triang. Trapez. & Dist. No. of Point Loads 4 -5 2100. 10.5 0.0 0.0 0. 0 0.0kN. & 41.5kN. m. 0.0kN. & 0.0kN. m.
Beam 5 of 20 Beam Id: BM5 fcu = 25.0N/sq. mm Mu = 140.400kN. m. Size: 450. BY 225. mm fy = 410.0N/sq. mm Flange width = 750.mm
Page 103
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
A. M O M E N T S ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Span Reinforcements ------------------Span Length S/N 1 -2 2 -4 1000. 5000. Moment (mm) -189.5 31.7 Steel (Sq. mm) Bottom 1316. 135. Top B B Provide
3 - Y16mm 3 - Y16mm
Support Reinforcements ---------------------Supt Reaction Moment S/N 1 2 4 300. -243. 32. (kN) 338.6 42.4 0.0 B. Steel (Sq. mm) Top Bottom T T T Provide
135. 3 - Y16mm
SHEAR
2 -4 49. 300. R10 @ 300.mm c/c 32. 300. R10 @ 300.mm c/c *NOTE*: Spacing Based on 2 Legs 10mm Dia. Bar with fy = 250.0 N/sq. mm
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Page 104
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
Initial Beam Sizes are: H = 450.0 B = 225.0 Bf = 750.0 Hf = 150.0 First Support Cantilever load and Moment are: Last Support Cantilever load and Moment are: Beam Loads are: Member Span Udl Triang. Trapez. & Dist. No. of Point Loads 1 -2 1000. 8.2 0.0 2 -4 5000. 16.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0. 0 0 0.0kN. & 338.6kN. m. 0.0kN. & 0.0kN. m.
Beam 6 of 20 Beam Id: BM6 fcu = 25.0N/sq. mm Mu = 140.400kN. m. Size: 450. BY 225. mm fy = 410.0N/sq. mm Flange width = 750.mm
A. M O M E N T S ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Span Reinforcements ------------------Span Length S/N Moment (mm) Steel (Sq. mm) Bottom Top
Page 105
Provide
(kN. m)
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
5 -6 6 -7
2500. 1000.
-50.8 -2.3
135. 135.
343. 135.
3 - Y16mm 3 - Y16mm
B B
Support Reinforcements ---------------------Supt Reaction Moment S/N 5 6 7 59. -13. -2. (kN) 114.2 7.6 0.0 B. Steel (Sq. mm) Top Bottom T T T Provide
SHEAR
5 -6 59. 300. R10 @ 300.mm c/c -27. 300. R10 @ 300.mm c/c 6 -7 13. 300. R10 @ 300.mm c/c -2. 300. R10 @ 300.mm c/c
*NOTE*: Spacing Based on 2 Legs 10mm Dia. Bar with fy = 250.0 N/sq. mm INPUT LISTING ------------Beam No. 6: BM6 Number of Supports = 3 Number of Spans = 2
Initial Beam Sizes are: H = 450.0 B = 225.0 Bf = 750.0 Hf = 150.0 First Support Cantilever load and Moment are: 0.0kN. & 114.2kN. m.
Page 106
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
Last Support Cantilever load and Moment are: Beam Loads are:
Member Span Udl Triang. Trapez. & Dist. No. of Point Loads 5 -6 2500. 12.9 0.0 6 -7 1000. 11.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0. 0 0
Beam 7 of 20
A. M O M E N T S ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Span Reinforcements ------------------Span Length S/N 1 -2 2 -3 3 -5 5 -6 6 -7 1000. 2000. 5100. 2500. 1000. Moment (mm) -665.9 111.7 20.3 3.6 0.8 Steel (Sq. mm) Bottom Top Provide
2-Y20 + 1-Y16mm B 2-Y20 + 1-Y16mm B 2-Y20 + 1-Y16mm B 2-Y20 + 1-Y16mm B 2-Y20 + 1-Y16mm B
Page 107
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
Support Reinforcements ---------------------Supt Reaction Moment S/N 1 2 3 5 6 7 1930. -2095. 276. 77. 27. 5. (kN) 1629.6 -295.1 87.2 23.9 2.9 0.0 Steel (Sq. mm) Top 743. Bottom Provide
3-Y25 + 2-Y20mm T
743. 2-Y20 + 1-Y16mm T 743. 2-Y20 + 1-Y16mm T 743. 2-Y20 + 1-Y16mm T 743. 2-Y20 + 1-Y16mm T 743. 2-Y20 + 1-Y16mm T
SHEAR
2 -3 -176. 414. R10 @ 400.mm c/c 207. 414. R10 @ 400.mm c/c 3 -5 69. 600. R10 @ 600.mm c/c 44. 600. R10 @ 600.mm c/c
5 -6 33. 600. R10 @ 600.mm c/c 16. 600. R10 @ 600.mm c/c 6 -7 11. 600. R10 @ 600.mm c/c 5. 600. R10 @ 600.mm c/c
*NOTE*: Spacing Based on 2 Legs 10mm Dia. Bar with fy = 250.0 N/sq. mm INPUT LISTING ------------Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Page 108
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
Initial Beam Sizes are: H = 2250.0 B = 225.0 Bf = 750.0 Hf = 150.0 First Support Cantilever load and Moment are: Last Support Cantilever load and Moment are: Beam Loads are: Member Span Udl Triang. Trapez. & Dist. No. of Point Loads 1 -2 1000. 11.0 0.0 2 -3 2000. 15.5 0.0 3 -5 5100. 22.3 0.0 5 -6 2500. 19.5 0.0 6 -7 1000. 16.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0.0kN. & 1629.6kN. m. 0.0kN. & 0.0kN. m.
Beam 8 of 20 Beam Id: BM8 fcu = 25.0N/sq. mm Mu = 140.400kN. m. Size: 450. BY 225. mm fy = 410.0N/sq. mm Flange width = 750.mm
A. M O M E N T S ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Span Reinforcements ------------------Span Length Moment Steel (Sq. mm) Provide
Page 109
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
S/N 5 -7 3500.
(mm) 0.2
(kN. m) 135.
Bottom 135.
Top B
3 - Y16mm
Support Reinforcements ---------------------Supt Reaction Moment S/N 5 7 68. 3. (kN) 113.6 0.0 B. Steel (Sq. mm) Top Bottom T T Provide
SHEAR
*NOTE*: Spacing Based on 2 Legs 10mm Dia. Bar with fy = 250.0 N/sq. mm INPUT LISTING ------------Beam No. 8: BM8 Number of Supports = 2 Number of Spans = 1
Initial Beam Sizes are: H = 450.0 B = 225.0 Bf = 750.0 Hf = 150.0 First Support Cantilever load and Moment are: Last Support Cantilever load and Moment are: Beam Loads are:
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Page 110
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
Member Span Udl Triang. Trapez. & Dist. No. of Point Loads 5 -7 3500. 20.2 0.0 0.0 0. 0
Beam 9 of 20 Beam Id: BM9 fcu = 25.0N/sq. mm Mu = 877.500kN. m. Size: 1050. BY 225. mm fy = 410.0N/sq. mm Flange width = 750.mm
Span
Length S/N
Provide
1 -3 3 -5 5 -7
B B B
Support Reinforcements ---------------------Supt Reaction Moment S/N 1 780. (kN) 1885.3 Steel (Sq. mm) Top Bottom T
Page 111
Provide
(kN. m) 5595.
2695. 8 - Y32mm
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
3 5 7
-715. 279. 0.
T T T
SHEAR
3 -5 -19. 600. R10 @ 600.mm c/c 179. 396. R10 @ 375.mm c/c 5 -7 100. 414. R10 @ 400.mm c/c 0. 600. R10 @ 600.mm c/c
*NOTE*: Spacing Based on 2 Legs 10mm Dia. Bar with fy = 250.0 N/sq. mm INPUT LISTING ------------Beam No. 9: BM9 Number of Supports = 4 Number of Spans = 3
Initial Beam Sizes are: H = 1050.0 B = 225.0 Bf = 750.0 Hf = 150.0 First Support Cantilever load and Moment are: Last Support Cantilever load and Moment are: Beam Loads are: Member Span Udl Triang. Trapez. & Dist. No. of Point Loads 1 -3 3000. 27.9 0.0 3 -5 5100. 31.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0. 0 0
Page 112
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
0.0
0.
Beam 10 of 20 Beam Id: BM10 fcu = 25.0N/sq. mm Mu = 429.975kN. m. Size: 750. BY 225. mm fy = 410.0N/sq. mm Flange width = 750.mm
A. M O M E N T S ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Span Reinforcements ------------------Span Length S/N 1 -3 3 -7 3000. 8600. Moment (mm) -724.1 197.8 Steel (Sq. mm) Bottom 2941. 236. Top B Provide
3 - Y16mm
2-Y20 + 1-Y16mm B
Support Reinforcements ---------------------Supt Reaction Moment S/N 1 3 7 377. -147. 114. (kN) 1265.4 229.9 0.0 B. Steel (Sq. mm) Top Bottom T T T Provide
SHEAR
Page 113
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
3 -7 167. 313. R10 @ 300.mm c/c 114. 414. R10 @ 400.mm c/c *NOTE*: Spacing Based on 2 Legs 10mm Dia. Bar with fy = 250.0 N/sq. mm INPUT LISTING ------------Beam No. 10: BM10 Number of Supports = 3 Number of Spans = 2
Initial Beam Sizes are: H = 750.0 B = 225.0 Bf = 750.0 Hf = 150.0 First Support Cantilever load and Moment are: Last Support Cantilever load and Moment are: Beam Loads are: Member Span Udl Triang. Trapez. & Dist. No. of Point Loads 1 -3 3000. 20.9 0.0 3 -7 8600. 32.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0. 0 0 0.0kN. & 1265.4kN. m. 0.0kN. & 0.0kN. m.
Beam 11 of 20 Beam Id: BM11 fcu = 25.0N/sq. mm Size: 450. BY 225. mm fy = 410.0N/sq. mm
Page 114
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
Mu = 140.400kN. m.
A. M O M E N T S ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Span Reinforcements ------------------Span Length S/N A -D 3500. Moment (mm) 5.8 Steel (Sq. mm) Bottom 135. Top B Provide
(kN. m) 135.
3 - Y16mm
Support Reinforcements ---------------------Supt Reaction Moment S/N A D 63. 16. (kN) 82.7 0.0 B. Steel (Sq. mm) Top Bottom T T Provide
SHEAR
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
SPAN
LEFT SUPPORT
A -D 63. 300. R10 @ 300.mm c/c 16. 300. R10 @ 300.mm c/c *NOTE*: Spacing Based on 2 Legs 10mm Dia. Bar with fy = 250.0 N/sq. mm INPUT LISTING
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Page 115
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
Initial Beam Sizes are: H = 450.0 B = 225.0 Bf = 750.0 Hf = 150.0 First Support Cantilever load and Moment are: Last Support Cantilever load and Moment are: Beam Loads are: Member Span Udl Triang. Trapez. & Dist. No. of Point Loads A -D 3500. 22.8 0.0 0.0 0. 0 0.0kN. & 82.7kN. m. 0.0kN. & 0.0kN. m.
Beam 12 of 20 Beam Id: BM12 fcu = 25.0N/sq. mm Mu = 429.975kN. m. Size: 750. BY 225. mm fy = 410.0N/sq. mm Flange width = 750.mm
Span
Length S/N
Provide
E -G G -H
7000. 2000.
3 - Y16mm 3 - Y16mm
B B
Support Reinforcements
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Page 116
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
---------------------Supt Reaction Moment S/N E G H 252. 93. -51. (kN) 1105.6 162.4 0.0 B. Steel (Sq. mm) Top Bottom T Provide
2628. 6 - Y32mm
SHEAR
E -G 252. 131. R10 @ 125.mm c/c -18. 450. R10 @ 450.mm c/c G -H 111. 414. R10 @ 400.mm c/c -51. 414. R10 @ 400.mm c/c *NOTE*: Spacing Based on 2 Legs 10mm Dia. Bar with fy = 250.0 N/sq. mm INPUT LISTING ------------Beam No. 12: BM12 Number of Supports = 3 Number of Spans = 2
Initial Beam Sizes are: H = 750.0 B = 225.0 Bf = 750.0 Hf = 150.0 First Support Cantilever load and Moment are: Last Support Cantilever load and Moment are: Beam Loads are: Member Span Udl Triang. Trapez. & Dist. No. of Point Loads
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Page 117
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
0.0 0.0
0. 0.
0 0
Beam 13 of 20 Beam Id: BM13 fcu = 25.0N/sq. mm Mu = 140.400kN. m. Size: 450. BY 225. mm fy = 410.0N/sq. mm Flange width = 750.mm
A. M O M E N T S ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Span Reinforcements ------------------Span Length S/N D -E 1500. Moment (mm) -4.9 Steel (Sq. mm) Bottom 135. Top B Provide
(kN. m) 135.
3 - Y16mm
Support Reinforcements ---------------------Supt Reaction Moment S/N D E 30. 1. (kN) 21.7 0.0 B. Steel (Sq. mm) Top Bottom T T Provide
SHEAR
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Page 118
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
SPAN
LEFT SUPPORT
*NOTE*: Spacing Based on 2 Legs 10mm Dia. Bar with fy = 250.0 N/sq. mm INPUT LISTING ------------Beam No. 13: BM13 Number of Supports = 2 Number of Spans = 1
Initial Beam Sizes are: H = 450.0 B = 225.0 Bf = 750.0 Hf = 150.0 First Support Cantilever load and Moment are: Last Support Cantilever load and Moment are: Beam Loads are: Member Span Udl Triang. Trapez. & Dist. No. of Point Loads D -E 1500. 21.1 0.0 0.0 0. 0 0.0kN. & 21.7kN. m. 0.0kN. & 0.0kN. m.
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
A. M O M E N T S ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Span Reinforcements ------------------Span Length S/N E -G G -H 7000. 2000. Moment (mm) -389.6 -72.4 Steel (Sq. mm) Bottom 1504. 280. Top B B Provide
3 - Y16mm 3 - Y16mm
Support Reinforcements ---------------------Supt Reaction Moment S/N E G H 245. 104. -61. (kN) 1035.9 167.5 0.0 B. Steel (Sq. mm) Top Bottom T Provide
1-Y20 + 2-Y16mm T T
236. 3 - Y16mm
SHEAR
G -H 106. 414. R10 @ 400.mm c/c -61. 414. R10 @ 400.mm c/c *NOTE*: Spacing Based on 2 Legs 10mm Dia. Bar with fy = 250.0 N/sq. mm
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Page 120
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
INPUT LISTING ------------Beam No. 14: BM14 Number of Supports = 3 Number of Spans = 2
Initial Beam Sizes are: H = 750.0 B = 225.0 Bf = 750.0 Hf = 150.0 First Support Cantilever load and Moment are: Last Support Cantilever load and Moment are: Beam Loads are: Member Span Udl Triang. Trapez. & Dist. No. of Point Loads E -G 7000. 34.6 0.0 G -H 2000. 22.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0. 0 0 0.0kN. & 1035.9kN. m. 0.0kN. & 0.0kN. m.
Beam 15 of 20 Beam Id: BM15 fcu = 25.0N/sq. mm Mu = 140.400kN. m. Size: 450. BY 225. mm fy = 410.0N/sq. mm Flange width = 750.mm
A. M O M E N T S ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Span Reinforcements ------------------Span Length S/N Moment (mm) Steel (Sq. mm) Bottom Top
Page 121
Provide
(kN. m)
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
A -B B -C C -D
B B B
Support Reinforcements ---------------------Supt Reaction Moment S/N A B C D 141. -103. 88. -31. (kN) 115.5 -14.0 18.1 0.0 B. Steel (Sq. mm) Top Bottom T T T T Provide
SHEAR
A -B 141. 134. R10 @ 125.mm c/c -118. 170. R10 @ 150.mm c/c B -C 15. 300. R10 @ 300.mm c/c 47. 300. R10 @ 300.mm c/c
C -D 41. 300. R10 @ 300.mm c/c -31. 300. R10 @ 300.mm c/c *NOTE*: Spacing Based on 2 Legs 10mm Dia. Bar with fy = 250.0 N/sq. mm INPUT LISTING ------------Beam No. 15: BM15
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Page 122
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
Number of Supports = 4
Number of Spans = 3
Initial Beam Sizes are: H = 450.0 B = 225.0 Bf = 750.0 Hf = 150.0 First Support Cantilever load and Moment are: Last Support Cantilever load and Moment are: Beam Loads are: Member Span Udl Triang. Trapez. & Dist. No. of Point Loads A -B 1000. 23.5 0.0 B -C 2000. 30.8 0.0 C -D 500. 20.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0. 0. 0 0 0 0.0kN. & 115.5kN. m. 0.0kN. & 0.0kN. m.
Beam 16 of 20 Beam Id: BM16 fcu = 25.0N/sq. mm Mu = 140.400kN. m. Size: 450. BY 225. mm fy = 410.0N/sq. mm Flange width = 750.mm
A. M O M E N T S ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Span Reinforcements ------------------Span Length S/N A -B B -C 1000. 2000. Moment (mm) -47.6 17.2 Steel (Sq. mm) Bottom 322. 135. Top B B
Page 123
Provide
3 - Y16mm 3 - Y16mm
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
C -D
500.
-7.9
135.
135.
3 - Y16mm
Support Reinforcements ---------------------Supt Reaction Moment S/N A B C D 142. -107. 84. -29. (kN) 115.6 -14.8 17.2 0.0 B. Steel (Sq. mm) Top Bottom T T T T Provide
SHEAR
A -B 142. 134. R10 @ 125.mm c/c -119. 168. R10 @ 150.mm c/c B -C 12. 300. R10 @ 300.mm c/c 44. 300. R10 @ 300.mm c/c
C -D 40. 300. R10 @ 300.mm c/c -29. 300. R10 @ 300.mm c/c *NOTE*: Spacing Based on 2 Legs 10mm Dia. Bar with fy = 250.0 N/sq. mm INPUT LISTING ------------Beam No. 16: BM16 Number of Supports = 4 Number of Spans = 3
Page 124
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
Initial Beam Sizes are: H = 450.0 B = 225.0 Bf = 750.0 Hf = 150.0 First Support Cantilever load and Moment are: Last Support Cantilever load and Moment are: Beam Loads are: Member Span Udl Triang. Trapez. & Dist. No. of Point Loads A -B 1000. 22.3 0.0 B -C 2000. 27.8 0.0 C -D 500. 21.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0. 0. 0 0 0 0.0kN. & 115.6kN. m. 0.0kN. & 0.0kN. m.
Beam 17 of 20 Beam Id: BM17 fcu = 25.0N/sq. mm Mu = 140.400kN. m. Size: 450. BY 225. mm fy = 410.0N/sq. mm Flange width = 750.mm
A. M O M E N T S ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Span Reinforcements ------------------Span Length S/N E -F F -G 3500. 3500. Moment (mm) -240.6 27.7 Steel (Sq. mm) Bottom 1714. 135. Top B B Provide
3 - Y16mm 3 - Y16mm
Support Reinforcements
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Page 125
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
---------------------Supt Reaction Moment S/N E F G 194. -11. 42. (kN) 530.3 49.2 0.0 B. Steel (Sq. mm) Top Bottom T T T Provide
SHEAR
F -G 70. 300. R10 @ 300.mm c/c 42. 300. R10 @ 300.mm c/c *NOTE*: Spacing Based on 2 Legs 10mm Dia. Bar with fy = 250.0 N/sq. mm INPUT LISTING ------------Beam No. 17: BM17 Number of Supports = 3 Number of Spans = 2
Initial Beam Sizes are: H = 450.0 B = 225.0 Bf = 750.0 Hf = 150.0 First Support Cantilever load and Moment are: Last Support Cantilever load and Moment are: Beam Loads are: Member Span Udl Triang. Trapez. & Dist. No. of Point Loads
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Page 126
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
0.0 0.0
0. 0.
0 0
Beam 18 of 20 Beam Id: BM18 fcu = 25.0N/sq. mm Mu = 140.400kN. m. Size: 450. BY 225. mm fy = 410.0N/sq. mm Flange width = 750.mm
A. M O M E N T S ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Span Reinforcements ------------------Span Length S/N D -E 1500. Moment (mm) -5.2 Steel (Sq. mm) Bottom 135. Top B Provide
(kN. m) 135.
3 - Y16mm
Support Reinforcements ---------------------Supt Reaction Moment S/N D E 30. 1. (kN) 21.7 0.0 B. Steel (Sq. mm) Top Bottom T T Provide
SHEAR
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Page 127
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
SPAN
LEFT SUPPORT
*NOTE*: Spacing Based on 2 Legs 10mm Dia. Bar with fy = 250.0 N/sq. mm
INPUT LISTING ------------Beam No. 18: BM18 Number of Supports = 2 Number of Spans = 1
Initial Beam Sizes are: H = 450.0 B = 225.0 Bf = 750.0 Hf = 150.0 First Support Cantilever load and Moment are: Last Support Cantilever load and Moment are: Beam Loads are: Member Span Udl Triang. Trapez. & Dist. No. of Point Loads D -E 1500. 20.1 0.0 0.0 0. 0 0.0kN. & 21.7kN. m. 0.0kN. & 0.0kN. m.
Beam 19 of 20 Beam Id: BM19 fcu = 25.0N/sq. mm Mu = 140.400kN. m. Size: 450. BY 225. mm fy = 410.0N/sq. mm Flange width = 750.mm
A. M O M E N T S
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Page 128
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Span Reinforcements ------------------Span Length S/N A -D 3500. Moment (mm) 6.2 Steel (Sq. mm) Bottom 135. Top B Provide
(kN. m) 135.
3 - Y16mm
Support Reinforcements ---------------------Supt Reaction Moment S/N A D 84. 19. (kN) 113.1 0.0 B. Steel (Sq. mm) Top Bottom T T Provide
SHEAR
A -D 84. 279. R10 @ 275.mm c/c 19. 300. R10 @ 300.mm c/c *NOTE*: Spacing Based on 2 Legs 10mm Dia. Bar with fy = 250.0 N/sq. mm INPUT LISTING ------------Beam No. 19: BM19
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Page 129
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
Number of Supports = 2
Number of Spans = 1
Initial Beam Sizes are: H = 450.0 B = 225.0 Bf = 750.0 Hf = 150.0 First Support Cantilever load and Moment are: Last Support Cantilever load and Moment are: Beam Loads are: Member Span Udl Triang. Trapez. & Dist. No. of Point Loads A -D 3500. 29.4 0.0 0.0 0. 0 0.0kN. & 113.1kN. m. 0.0kN. & 0.0kN. m.
Beam 20 of 20 Beam Id: BM20 fcu = 25.0N/sq. mm Mu = 429.975kN. m. Size: 750. BY 225. mm fy = 410.0N/sq. mm Flange width = 750.mm
A. M O M E N T S ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Span Reinforcements ------------------Span Length S/N E -F F -G G -H 3500. 3500. 2000. Moment (mm) -407.4 126.2 -48.1 Steel (Sq. mm) Bottom 1576. 236. 236. Top B B B Provide
Support Reinforcements ---------------------Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Page 130
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
Supt
Provide
E F G H
T T T T
SHEAR
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
SPAN
LEFT SUPPORT
F -G -61. 414. R10 @ 400.mm c/c 172. 250. R10 @ 250.mm c/c G -H 92. 414. R10 @ 400.mm c/c -33. 414. R10 @ 400.mm c/c *NOTE*: Spacing Based on 2 Legs 10mm Dia. Bar with fy = 250.0 N/sq. mm INPUT LISTING ------------Beam No. 20: BM20 Number of Supports = 4 Number of Spans = 3
Initial Beam Sizes are: H = 750.0 B = 225.0 Bf = 750.0 Hf = 150.0 First Support Cantilever load and Moment are: Last Support Cantilever load and Moment are: 0.0kN. & 1193.1kN. m. 0.0kN. & 0.0kN. m.
Page 131
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
Beam Loads are: Member Span Udl Triang. Trapez. & Dist. No. of Point Loads E -F 3500. 31.7 0.0 F -G 3500. 31.7 0.0 G -H 2000. 29.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0. 0. 0 0 0
4.3.3
Column Analysis and Design Job Ref: Column Design Date : August, 2012
A. INPUT DATA ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Axial Load Moment about X - axis Moment about Y - axis = 113.8kN.
= 25.88kN. m. = 31.20kN. m.
B. FINAL INPUT MOMENTS ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Moment about X - axis Moment about Y - axis = 25.88kN. m. = 31.20kN. m.
Page 132
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
C. OUTPUT DATA ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Area of Steel required = 1519. Sq. mm. Main Bars : Provide 4 - Y20mm + 2 - Y16mm. Bars Links : Provide Y10mm @ 200mm c/c. = 997.8kN.
Ultimate Moment about X-axis = 55.70kN. m. Ultimate Moment about Y-axis = 55.70kN. m. *Steel Percentage = 3.0%
COL. 2 OF 23 Column Id.: Cl 2 fcu = 25.0N/Sq. mm Size : 225 BY 225 mm fy = 410.0N/Sq. mm Type : UNIAXIALLY LOADED
A. INPUT DATA ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Axial Load Moment about X - axis Moment about Y - axis = 134.7kN.
= 28.48kN. m. = 0.00kN. m.
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
= 0.00kN. m.
C. OUTPUT DATA ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Area of Steel required = 709. Sq. mm. Main Bars : Provide 4 - Y16mm. Links Bars
Ultimate Moment about X-axis = 29.61kN. m. Ultimate Moment about Y-axis = 29.61kN. m. *Steel Percentage = 1.4%
COL. 3 OF 23 Column Id.: Cl 3 fcu = 25.0N/Sq. mm Size : 225 BY 225 mm fy = 410.0N/Sq. mm Type : BIAXIALLY LOADED
A. INPUT DATA ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Axial Load Moment about X - axis Moment about Y - axis = 108.2kN.
= 12.64kN. m. = 20.70kN. m.
Page 134
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
= 12.64kN. m. = 20.70kN. m.
C. OUTPUT DATA ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Area of Steel required = 810. Sq. mm. Main Bars : Provide 4 - Y16mm + 2 - Y12mm. Bars Links : Provide Y10mm @ 150mm c/c. = 776.8kN.
Ultimate Moment about X-axis = 32.43kN. m. Ultimate Moment about Y-axis = 32.43kN. m. *Steel Percentage = 1.6%
COL. 4 OF 23 Column Id.: Cl 4 fcu = 25.0N/Sq. mm Size : 225 BY 225 mm fy = 410.0N/Sq. mm Type : BIAXIALLY LOADED
A. INPUT DATA ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Axial Load Moment about X - axis Moment about Y - axis = 87.3kN.
= 9.66kN. m. = 8.44kN. m.
Page 135
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
C. OUTPUT DATA ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Area of Steel required = 203. Sq. mm. Main Bars : Provide 4 - Y12mm Links Bars
Ultimate Moment about X-axis = 17.68kN. m. Ultimate Moment about Y-axis = 17.68kN. m. *Steel Percentage = 0.4%
COL. 5 OF 23 Column Id.: Cl 5 fcu = 25.0N/Sq. mm Size : 225 BY 225 mm fy = 410.0N/Sq. mm Type : BIAXIALLY LOADED
A. INPUT DATA ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Axial Load Moment about X - axis Moment about Y - axis = 131.7kN.
= 31.29kN. m. = 28.90kN. m.
Page 136
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
B. FINAL INPUT MOMENTS ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Moment about X - axis Moment about Y - axis = 31.29kN. m. = 28.90kN. m.
C. OUTPUT DATA ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Area of Steel required = 1569. Sq. mm. Main Bars : Provide 4 - Y20mm + 2 - Y16mm. Bars Links : Provide Y10mm @ 200mm c/c. = 1014.0kN.
Ultimate Moment about X-axis = 57.36kN. m. Ultimate Moment about Y-axis = 57.36kN. m. *Steel Percentage = 3.1%
COL. 6 OF 23 Column Id.: Cl 6 fcu = 25.0N/Sq. mm Size : 225 BY 225 mm fy = 410.0N/Sq. mm Type : BIAXIALLY LOADED
Page 137
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
151.4kN.
= 31.45kN. m. = 25.21kN. m.
B. FINAL INPUT MOMENTS ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Moment about X - axis Moment about Y - axis = 31.45kN. m. = 25.21kN. m.
C. OUTPUT DATA ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Area of Steel required = 1468. Sq. mm. Main Bars : Provide 4 - Y20mm + 2 - Y12mm. Bars Links : Provide Y10mm @ 200mm c/c. = 981.6kN.
Ultimate Moment about X-axis = 54.03kN. m. Ultimate Moment about Y-axis = 54.03kN. m.
*Steel Percentage
= 2.9%
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
Size
: 350 BY 350 mm
A. INPUT DATA ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Axial Load Moment about X - axis Moment about Y - axis = 123.5kN.
= 13.70kN. m. = 225.00kN. m.
B. FINAL INPUT MOMENTS ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Moment about X - axis Moment about Y - axis = 13.70kN. m. = 225.00kN. m.
C. OUTPUT DATA ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Area of Steel required = 4287. Sq. mm. Main Bars : Provide 4 - Y32mm + 4 - Y20mm. Bars Links : Provide Y10mm @ 225mm c/c. = 2610.2kN.
Ultimate Moment about X-axis = 240.98kN. m. Ultimate Moment about Y-axis = 240.98kN. m. *Steel Percentage = 3.5%
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Page 139
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
COL. 8 OF 23 Column Id.: Cl 8 fcu = 25.0N/Sq. mm Size : 225 BY 225 mm fy = 410.0N/Sq. mm Type : BIAXIALLY LOADED
A. INPUT DATA ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Axial Load Moment about X - axis Moment about Y - axis = 100.5kN.
= 11.67kN. m. = 15.61kN. m.
B. FINAL INPUT MOMENTS ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Moment about X - axis Moment about Y - axis = 11.67kN. m. = 15.61kN. m.
C. OUTPUT DATA ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Area of Steel required = 608. Sq. mm. Main Bars : Provide 4 - Y16mm. Bars
Links
Ultimate Moment about X-axis = 26.79kN. m. Ultimate Moment about Y-axis = 26.79kN. m. *Steel Percentage = 1.2%
Page 140
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
COL. 9 OF 23 Column Id.: Cl 9 fcu = 25.0N/Sq. mm Size : 225 BY 225 mm fy = 410.0N/Sq. mm Type : BIAXIALLY LOADED
A. INPUT DATA ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Axial Load Moment about X - axis Moment about Y - axis = 136.1kN.
= 38.76kN. m. = 29.70kN. m.
B. FINAL INPUT MOMENTS ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Moment about X - axis Moment about Y - axis = 38.76kN. m. = 29.70kN. m.
Area of Steel required = 1822. Sq. mm. Main Bars : Provide 6 - Y20mm. Links Bars
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
Ultimate Moment about X-axis = 65.69kN. m. Ultimate Moment about Y-axis = 65.69kN. m. *Steel Percentage = 3.6%
COL. 10 OF 23 Column Id.: Cl 10 fcu = 25.0N/Sq. mm Size : 300 BY 300 mm fy = 410.0N/Sq. mm Type : BIAXIALLY LOADED
A. INPUT DATA ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Axial Load Moment about X - axis Moment about Y - axis = 225.4kN.
= 49.27kN. m. = 37.60kN. m.
B. FINAL INPUT MOMENTS ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Moment about X - axis Moment about Y - axis = 49.27kN. m. = 37.60kN. m.
Page 142
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
Main Bars : Provide 4 - Y20mm + 2 - Y16mm. Bars Links : Provide Y10mm @ 200mm c/c. = 1451.1kN.
Ultimate Moment about X-axis = 83.57kN. m. Ultimate Moment about Y-axis = 83.57kN. m. *Steel Percentage = 1.8%
COL. 11 OF 23 Column Id.: Cl 11 fcu = 25.0N/Sq. mm Size : 225 BY 225 mm fy = 410.0N/Sq. mm Type : BIAXIALLY LOADED
A. INPUT DATA ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Axial Load Moment about X - axis Moment about Y - axis = 176.3kN.
= 11.25kN. m. = 12.80kN. m.
= 11.25kN. m. = 12.80kN. m.
Page 143
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
C. OUTPUT DATA ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Area of Steel required = 456. Sq. mm. Main Bars : Provide 4 - Y16mm. Links Bars
Ultimate Moment about X-axis = 22.76kN. m. Ultimate Moment about Y-axis = 22.76kN. m. *Steel Percentage = 0.9%
COL. 12 OF 23 Column Id.: Cl 12 fcu = 25.0N/Sq. mm Size : 225 BY 225 mm fy = 410.0N/Sq. mm Type : UNIAXIALLY LOADED
A. INPUT DATA ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Axial Load Moment about X - axis Moment about Y - axis = 100.5kN.
= 11.67kN. m. = 0.00kN. m.
Page 144
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
C. OUTPUT DATA ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Area of Steel required = 203. Sq. mm. Main Bars : Provide 4 - Y12mm Links Bars
Ultimate Moment about X-axis = 12.63kN. m. Ultimate Moment about Y-axis = 12.63kN. m. *Steel Percentage = 0.4%
COL. 13 OF 23 Column Id.: Cl 13 fcu = 25.0N/Sq. mm Size : 225 BY 225 mm fy = 410.0N/Sq. mm Type : UNIAXIALLY LOADED
A. INPUT DATA ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Axial Load Moment about X - axis = 158.0kN. = 7.09kN. m.
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Page 145
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
= 0.00kN. m.
B. FINAL INPUT MOMENTS ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Moment about X - axis Moment about Y - axis = 7.09kN. m. = 0.00kN. m.
C. OUTPUT DATA ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Area of Steel required = 203. Sq. mm. Main Bars : Provide 4 - Y12mm Links Bars
Ultimate Moment about X-axis = 12.63kN. m. Ultimate Moment about Y-axis = 12.63kN. m. *Steel Percentage = 0.4%
COL. 14 OF 23 Column Id.: Cl 14 fcu = 25.0N/Sq. mm Size : 225 BY 225 mm fy = 410.0N/Sq. mm Type : BIAXIALLY LOADED
Page 146
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
= =
133.8kN. 6.71kN. m.
= 8.80kN. m.
B. FINAL INPUT MOMENTS ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Moment about X - axis Moment about Y - axis = 6.71kN. m. = 8.80kN. m.
C. OUTPUT DATA ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Area of Steel required = 203. Sq. mm. Main Bars : Provide 4 - Y12mm Links Bars
Ultimate Moment about X-axis = 14.76kN. m. Ultimate Moment about Y-axis = 14.76kN. m. *Steel Percentage = 0.4%
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
Size
: 225 BY 225 mm
A. INPUT DATA ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Axial Load Moment about X - axis Moment about Y - axis = 149.5kN.
= 13.23kN. m. = 0.00kN. m.
B. FINAL INPUT MOMENTS ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Moment about X - axis Moment about Y - axis = 13.23kN. m. = 0.00kN. m.
C. OUTPUT DATA ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Area of Steel required = 203. Sq. mm. Main Bars : Provide 4 - Y12mm Links Bars
Ultimate Moment about X-axis = 14.76kN. m. Ultimate Moment about Y-axis = 14.76kN. m. *Steel Percentage = 0.4%
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Page 148
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
COL. 16 OF 23 Column Id.: Cl 16 fcu = 25.0N/Sq. mm Size : 225 BY 225 mm fy = 410.0N/Sq. mm Type : AXIALLY LOADED
A. INPUT DATA ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Axial Load Moment about X - axis Moment about Y - axis = 246.6kN. = 0.00kN. m. = 0.00kN. m.
B. FINAL INPUT MOMENTS ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Moment about X - axis Moment about Y - axis = 0.00kN. m. = 0.00kN. m.
C. OUTPUT DATA ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Area of Steel required = 203. Sq. mm. Main Bars : Provide 4 - Y12mm Links Bars
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Page 149
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
Size
: 225 BY 225 mm
A. INPUT DATA ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Axial Load Moment about X - axis Moment about Y - axis = 114.1kN. = 7.26kN. m. = 0.00kN. m.
B. FINAL INPUT MOMENTS ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Moment about X - axis Moment about Y - axis = 7.26kN. m. = 0.00kN. m.
C. OUTPUT DATA ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Area of Steel required = 203. Sq. mm. Main Bars : Provide 4 - Y12mm Links Bars
Ultimate Moment about X-axis = 9.31kN. m. Ultimate Moment about Y-axis = 9.31kN. m. *Steel Percentage = 0.4%
Page 150
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
COL. 18 OF 23 Column Id.: Cl 18 fcu = 25.0N/Sq. mm Size : 225 BY 225 mm fy = 410.0N/Sq. mm Type : UNIAXIALLY LOADED
A. INPUT DATA ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Axial Load Moment about X - axis Moment about Y - axis = 61.4kN.
= 4.03kN. m. = 0.00kN. m.
B. FINAL INPUT MOMENTS ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Moment about X - axis Moment about Y - axis = 4.03kN. m. = 0.00kN. m.
C. OUTPUT DATA ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Area of Steel required = 203. Sq. mm. Main Bars : Provide 4 - Y12mm Links Bars
Page 151
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
COL. 19 OF 23 Column Id.: Cl 19 fcu = 25.0N/Sq. mm Size : 225 BY 225 mm fy = 410.0N/Sq. mm Type : BIAXIALLY LOADED
A. INPUT DATA ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Axial Load Moment about X - axis Moment about Y - axis = 158.7kN.
= 19.70kN. m. = 15.00kN. m.
B. FINAL INPUT MOMENTS ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Moment about X - axis Moment about Y - axis = 19.70kN. m. = 15.00kN. m.
C. OUTPUT DATA ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Area of Steel required = 861. Sq. mm. Main Bars : Provide 4 - Y16mm + 2 - Y12mm. Bars Links : Provide Y10mm @ 150mm c/c.
Page 152
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
= 796.5kN.
Ultimate Moment about X-axis = 33.85kN. m. Ultimate Moment about Y-axis = 33.85kN. m. *Steel Percentage = 1.7%
COL. 20 OF 23 Column Id.: Cl 20 fcu = 25.0N/Sq. mm Size : 225 BY 225 mm fy = 410.0N/Sq. mm Type : UNIAXIALLY LOADED
A. INPUT DATA ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Axial Load Moment about X - axis Moment about Y - axis = 124.1kN.
= 56.13kN. m. = 0.00kN. m.
B. FINAL INPUT MOMENTS ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Moment about X - axis Moment about Y - axis = 56.13kN. m. = 0.00kN. m.
Page 153
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
Main Bars : Provide 4 - Y20mm + 2 - Y16mm. Bars Links : Provide Y10mm @ 200mm c/c. = 1014.0kN.
Ultimate Moment about X-axis = 57.36kN. m. Ultimate Moment about Y-axis = 57.36kN. m. *Steel Percentage = 3.1%
COL. 21 OF 23 Column Id.: Cl 21 fcu = 25.0N/Sq. mm Size : 300 BY 300 mm fy = 410.0N/Sq. mm Type : BIAXIALLY LOADED
A. INPUT DATA ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Axial Load Moment about X - axis Moment about Y - axis = 284.0kN.
= 52.94kN. m. = 44.30kN. m.
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
= 44.30kN. m.
C. OUTPUT DATA ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Area of Steel required = 1800. Sq. mm. Main Bars : Provide 6 - Y20mm. Links Bars
Ultimate Moment about X-axis = 92.57kN. m. Ultimate Moment about Y-axis = 92.57kN. m. *Steel Percentage = 2.0%
COL. 22 OF 23 Column Id.: Cl 22 fcu = 25.0N/Sq. mm Size : 225 BY 225 mm fy = 410.0N/Sq. mm Type : UNIAXIALLY LOADED
A. INPUT DATA ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Axial Load Moment about X - axis Moment about Y - axis = 20.5kN.
= 34.17kN. m. = 0.00kN. m.
Page 155
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
C. OUTPUT DATA ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Area of Steel required = 911. Sq. mm. Main Bars : Provide 4 - Y16mm + 2 - Y12mm. Bars Links : Provide Y10mm @ 150mm c/c. = 816.3kN.
Ultimate Moment about X-axis = 35.26kN. m. Ultimate Moment about Y-axis = 35.26kN. m. *Steel Percentage = 1.8%
COL. 23 OF 23 Column Id.: Cl 23 fcu = 25.0N/Sq. mm Size : 225 BY 225 mm fy = 410.0N/Sq. mm Type : UNIAXIALLY LOADED
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
= 30.10kN. m. = 0.00kN. m.
B. FINAL INPUT MOMENTS ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Moment about X - axis Moment about Y - axis = 30.10kN. m. = 0.00kN. m.
C. OUTPUT DATA ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Area of Steel required = 759. Sq. mm. Main Bars : Provide 4 - Y16mm. Bars
Links
Ultimate Moment about X-axis = 31.02kN. m. Ultimate Moment about Y-axis = 31.02kN. m. *Steel Percentage = 1.5%
4.3.4
Base Analysis and Design Job Ref: Base Design Designed: Samaila Sani Saulawa Date : August, 2012 Checked: ____Engr. Samaila Bawa____
Page 157
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
fy = 410.0 N/Sq. mm TYPE : ISOLATED FOOTING Depth : 300. mm Load : 113.770 kN.
Area of Steel req. = 397.500 Sq. m Provide Y12. @ 275.mm c/c Bottom ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ B. PARALLEL TO 800.mm Moments = 7.665 kN. m
Area of Steel req. = 367.500 Sq. m Provide Y12. @ 300.mm c/c Bottom ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ C. STRESSES Shear Stress = -.11 N/Sq. mm
Punching Shear Stress = 0.00 N/Sq. mm Local Bond Stress Perm. Shear Stress = 1.62 N/SQ. mm = 0.39 N/SQ. mm
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
Area of Steel req. = 397.500 Sq. m Provide Y12. @ 275.mm c/c Bottom ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ B. PARALLEL TO 850.mm Moments = 9.518 kN. m
Area of Steel req. = 367.500 Sq. m Provide Y12. @ 300.mm c/c Bottom ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ C. STRESSES Shear Stress = -.08 N/Sq. mm
Punching Shear Stress = 0.00 N/Sq. mm Local Bond Stress Perm. Shear Stress = 1.85 N/SQ. mm = 0.39 N/SQ. mm
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
Sketch :
Moments
6.943 kN. m
Area of Steel req. = 397.500 Sq. m Provide Y12. @ 275.mm c/c Bottom ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ B. PARALLEL TO 750.mm Moments = 6.943 kN. m
Area of Steel req. = 367.500 Sq. m Provide Y12. @ 300.mm c/c Bottom ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ C. STRESSES Shear Stress = -.16 N/Sq. mm
Punching Shear Stress = 0.00 N/Sq. mm Local Bond Stress Perm. Shear Stress = 1.61 N/SQ. mm = 0.39 N/SQ. mm
Base 4 of 23 Base Id: BS 4 TYPE : ISOLATED FOOTING Depth : 250. mm Load : 87.320 kN.
Page 160
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
Area of Steel req. = 322.500 Sq. m Provide Y12. @ 350.mm c/c Bottom ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ B. PARALLEL TO 700.mm Moments = 5.292 kN. m
Area of Steel req. = 292.500 Sq. m Provide Y12. @ 375.mm c/c Bottom ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ C. STRESSES Shear Stress = -.09 N/Sq. mm
Punching Shear Stress = 0.00 N/Sq. mm Local Bond Stress Perm. Shear Stress = 2.18 N/SQ. mm = 0.42 N/SQ. mm
Base 5 of 23 Base Id: BS 5 TYPE : ISOLATED FOOTING Depth : 300. mm Load : 131.690 kN. A. PARALLEL TO 850.mm
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Page 161
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
Moments
9.298 kN. m
Area of Steel req. = 397.500 Sq. m Provide Y12. @ 275.mm c/c Bottom ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ B. PARALLEL TO 850.mm Moments = 9.298 kN. m
Area of Steel req. = 367.500 Sq. m Provide Y12. @ 300.mm c/c Bottom ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ C. STRESSES Shear Stress = -.08 N/Sq. mm
Punching Shear Stress = 0.00 N/Sq. mm Local Bond Stress Perm. Shear Stress = 1.81 N/SQ. mm = 0.39 N/SQ. mm
Base 6 of 23 Base Id: BS 6 TYPE : ISOLATED FOOTING Depth : 300. mm Load : 151.350 kN. A. PARALLEL TO 900.mm Moments = 11.132 kN. m
Page 162
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
Provide Y12. @ 275.mm c/c Bottom ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ B. PARALLEL TO 900.mm Moments = 11.132 kN. m
Area of Steel req. = 367.500 Sq. m Provide Y12. @ 300.mm c/c Bottom ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ C. STRESSES Shear Stress = -.04 N/Sq. mm
Punching Shear Stress = 0.00 N/Sq. mm Local Bond Stress Perm. Shear Stress = 2.01 N/SQ. mm = 0.39 N/SQ. mm
Area of Steel req. = 397.500 Sq. m Provide Y12. @ 275.mm c/c Bottom
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Page 163
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
Area of Steel req. = 367.500 Sq. m Provide Y12. @ 300.mm c/c Bottom ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ C. STRESSES Shear Stress = -.12 N/Sq. mm
Punching Shear Stress = 0.00 N/Sq. mm Local Bond Stress Perm. Shear Stress = 1.77 N/SQ. mm = 0.39 N/SQ. mm
Base 8 of 23 Base Id: BS 8 TYPE : ISOLATED FOOTING Depth : 250. mm Load : 100.480 kN.
Area of Steel req. = 322.500 Sq. m Provide Y12. @ 350.mm c/c Bottom ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Page 164
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
Area of Steel req. = 292.500 Sq. m Provide Y12. @ 375.mm c/c Bottom ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ C. STRESSES Shear Stress = -.04 N/Sq. mm
Punching Shear Stress = 0.00 N/Sq. mm Local Bond Stress Perm. Shear Stress = 2.41 N/SQ. mm = 0.42 N/SQ. mm
Base 9 of 23 Base Id: BS 9 TYPE : ISOLATED FOOTING Depth : 300. mm Load : 136.140 kN. A. PARALLEL TO 850.mm Moments = 9.629 kN. m
Area of Steel req. = 397.500 Sq. m Provide Y12. @ 275.mm c/c Bottom ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ B. PARALLEL TO 850.mm Moments = 9.629 kN. m
Page 165
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
Area of Steel req. = 367.500 Sq. m Provide Y12. @ 300.mm c/c Bottom ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ C. STRESSES Shear Stress = -.08 N/Sq. mm
Punching Shear Stress = 0.00 N/Sq. mm Local Bond Stress Perm. Shear Stress = 1.87 N/SQ. mm = 0.39 N/SQ. mm
Base 10 of 23 Base Id: BS 10 TYPE : ISOLATED FOOTING Depth : 350. mm Load : 225.410 kN. A. PARALLEL TO 1100.mm Moments = 18.486 kN. m
Area of Steel req. = 472.500 Sq. m Provide Y12. @ 225.mm c/c Bottom ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ B. PARALLEL TO 1100.mm Moments = 18.486 kN. m
Page 166
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
Provide Y12. @ 250.mm c/c Bottom ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ C. STRESSES Shear Stress = 0.00 N/Sq. mm
Punching Shear Stress = 0.00 N/Sq. mm Local Bond Stress Perm. Shear Stress = 1.74 N/SQ. mm = 0.37 N/SQ. mm
Base 11 of 23 Base Id: BS 11 TYPE : ISOLATED FOOTING Depth : 300. mm Load : 176.290 kN. A. PARALLEL TO 950.mm Moments = 13.455 kN. m
Area of Steel req. = 397.500 Sq. m Provide Y12. @ 275.mm c/c Bottom ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ B. PARALLEL TO 950.mm Moments = 13.455 kN. m
Area of Steel req. = 367.500 Sq. m Provide Y12. @ 300.mm c/c Bottom ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Page 167
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
Punching Shear Stress = 0.00 N/Sq. mm Local Bond Stress Perm. Shear Stress = 2.26 N/SQ. mm = 0.39 N/SQ. mm
Base 12 of 23 Base Id: BS 12 TYPE : ISOLATED FOOTING Depth : 250. mm Load : 100.480 kN. A. PARALLEL TO 750.mm Moments = 6.480 kN. m
Area of Steel req. = 322.500 Sq. m Provide Y12. @ 350.mm c/c Bottom ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ B. PARALLEL TO 750.mm Moments = 6.480 kN. m
Area of Steel req. = 292.500 Sq. m Provide Y12. @ 375.mm c/c Bottom ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ C. STRESSES
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Page 168
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
Shear Stress
= -.04 N/Sq. mm
Punching Shear Stress = 0.00 N/Sq. mm Local Bond Stress Perm. Shear Stress = 2.41 N/SQ. mm = 0.42 N/SQ. mm
Base 13 of 23 Base Id: BS 13 TYPE : ISOLATED FOOTING Depth : 300. mm Load : 157.970 kN. A. PARALLEL TO 900.mm Moments = 11.644 kN. m
Area of Steel req. = 397.500 Sq. m Provide Y12. @ 275.mm c/c Bottom ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ B. PARALLEL TO 900.mm Moments = 11.644 kN. m
Area of Steel req. = 367.500 Sq. m Provide Y12. @ 300.mm c/c Bottom ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ C. STRESSES Shear Stress = -.04 N/Sq. mm
Page 169
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
Base 14 of 23 Base Id: BS 14 TYPE : ISOLATED FOOTING Depth : 300. mm Load : 133.750 kN. A. PARALLEL TO 850.mm Moments = 9.451 kN. m
Area of Steel req. = 397.500 Sq. m Provide Y12. @ 275.mm c/c Bottom ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ B. PARALLEL TO 850.mm Moments = 9.451 kN. m
Area of Steel req. = 367.500 Sq. m Provide Y12. @ 300.mm c/c Bottom ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ C. STRESSES Shear Stress = -.08 N/Sq. mm
Punching Shear Stress = 0.00 N/Sq. mm Local Bond Stress Perm. Shear Stress = 1.84 N/SQ. mm = 0.39 N/SQ. mm
Page 170
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
Perm. Local Bond Stress = 2.50 N/SQ. mm Base 15 of 23 Base Id: BS 15 TYPE : ISOLATED FOOTING Depth : 300. mm Load : 149.510 kN. A. PARALLEL TO 900.mm Moments = 10.990 kN. m
Area of Steel req. = 397.500 Sq. m Provide Y12. @ 275.mm c/c Bottom ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ B. PARALLEL TO 900.mm Moments = 10.990 kN. m
Area of Steel req. = 367.500 Sq. m Provide Y12. @ 300.mm c/c Bottom ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ C. STRESSES Shear Stress = -.04 N/Sq. mm
Punching Shear Stress = 0.00 N/Sq. mm Local Bond Stress Perm. Shear Stress = 1.98 N/SQ. mm = 0.39 N/SQ. mm
Base 16 of 23
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Page 171
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
Base Id: BS 16
TYPE : ISOLATED FOOTING Depth : 350. mm Load : 246.600 kN. A. PARALLEL TO 1150.mm
Moments
= 20.680 kN. m
Area of Steel req. = 472.500 Sq. m Provide Y12. @ 225.mm c/c Bottom ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ B. PARALLEL TO 1150.mm Moments = 20.680 kN. m
Area of Steel req. = 442.500 Sq. m Provide Y12. @ 250.mm c/c Bottom ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ C. STRESSES Shear Stress = 0.04 N/Sq. mm
Punching Shear Stress = 0.00 N/Sq. mm Local Bond Stress Perm. Shear Stress = 1.84 N/SQ. mm = 0.37 N/SQ. mm
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
Sketch :
Moments
7.689 kN. m
Area of Steel req. = 397.500 Sq. m Provide Y12. @ 275.mm c/c Bottom ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ B. PARALLEL TO 800.mm Moments = 7.689 kN. m
Area of Steel req. = 367.500 Sq. m Provide Y12. @ 300.mm c/c Bottom ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ C. STRESSES Shear Stress = -.11 N/Sq. mm
Punching Shear Stress = 0.00 N/Sq. mm Local Bond Stress Perm. Shear Stress = 1.63 N/SQ. mm = 0.39 N/SQ. mm
Base 18 of 23 Base Id: BS 18 TYPE : ISOLATED FOOTING Depth : 250. mm Load : 61.430 kN.
Page 173
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
Provide Y12. @ 350.mm c/c Bottom ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ B. PARALLEL TO 600.mm Moments = 3.152 kN. m
Area of Steel req. = 292.500 Sq. m Provide Y12. @ 375.mm c/c Bottom ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ C. STRESSES Shear Stress = -.18 N/Sq. mm
Punching Shear Stress = 0.00 N/Sq. mm Local Bond Stress Perm. Shear Stress = 1.64 N/SQ. mm = 0.42 N/SQ. mm
Base 19 of 23 Base Id: BS 19 TYPE : ISOLATED FOOTING Depth : 300. mm Load : 158.700 kN. A. PARALLEL TO 900.mm
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Page 174
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
Moments
= 11.700 kN. m
Area of Steel req. = 397.500 Sq. m Provide Y12. @ 275.mm c/c Bottom ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ B. PARALLEL TO 900.mm Moments = 11.700 kN. m
Area of Steel req. = 367.500 Sq. m Provide Y12. @ 300.mm c/c Bottom ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ C. STRESSES Shear Stress = -.04 N/Sq. mm
Punching Shear Stress = 0.00 N/Sq. mm Local Bond Stress Perm. Shear Stress = 2.11 N/SQ. mm = 0.39 N/SQ. mm
Base 20 of 23 Base Id: BS 20 TYPE : ISOLATED FOOTING Depth : 300. mm Load : 124.600 kN. A. PARALLEL TO 800.mm Moments = 8.434 kN. m
Page 175
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
Provide Y12. @ 275.mm c/c Bottom ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ B. PARALLEL TO 800.mm Moments = 8.434 kN. m
Provide Y12. @ 300.mm c/c Bottom ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ C. STRESSES Shear Stress = -.12 N/Sq. mm
Punching Shear Stress = 0.00 N/Sq. mm Local Bond Stress Perm. Shear Stress = 1.78 N/SQ. mm = 0.39 N/SQ. mm
Base 21 of 23 Base Id: BS 21 TYPE : ISOLATED FOOTING Depth : 350. mm Load : 283.990 kN. A. PARALLEL TO 1200.mm Moments = 24.381 kN. m
Area of Steel req. = 472.500 Sq. m Provide Y12. @ 225.mm c/c Bottom
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Page 176
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
Area of Steel req. = 442.500 Sq. m Provide Y12. @ 250.mm c/c Bottom ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ C. STRESSES Shear Stress = 0.07 N/Sq. mm
Punching Shear Stress = 0.01 N/Sq. mm Local Bond Stress Perm. Shear Stress = 2.06 N/SQ. mm = 0.37 N/SQ. mm
Base 22 of 23 Base Id: BS 22 TYPE : ISOLATED FOOTING Depth : 200. mm Load : 20.500 kN. A. PARALLEL TO 350.mm Moments = 0.346 kN. m
Area of Steel req. = 247.500 Sq. m Provide Y12. @ 450.mm c/c Bottom ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ B. PARALLEL TO 350.mm
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Page 177
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
Moments
0.346 kN. m
Area of Steel req. = 217.500 Sq. m Provide Y12. @ 500.mm c/c Bottom ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ C. STRESSES Shear Stress = -.37 N/Sq. mm
Punching Shear Stress = 0.00 N/Sq. mm Local Bond Stress Perm. Shear Stress = 0.95 N/SQ. mm = 0.46 N/SQ. mm
Base 23 of 23 Base Id: BS 23 TYPE : ISOLATED FOOTING Depth : 200. mm Load : 24.600 kN. A. PARALLEL TO 400.mm Moments = 0.622 kN. m
Area of Steel req. = 247.500 Sq. m Provide Y12. @ 450.mm c/c Bottom ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ B. PARALLEL TO 400.mm Moments = 0.622 kN. m
Page 178
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
Provide Y12. @ 500.mm c/c Bottom C. STRESSES Shear Stress = -.28 N/Sq. mm
Punching Shear Stress = 0.00 N/Sq. mm Local Bond Stress Perm. Shear Stress = 1.21 N/SQ. mm = 0.46 N/SQ. mm
Thank you for using RCD2000 - Pls Contact 0803-323-1885 for Details
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Page 179
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
4.4.0 Result Summary Structural Elements Manual Result Obtained Panel 1 Short Span Mid Span R12@150 At Edge R16@200 Civilsoft 2010 Design Result Panel 1 Short Span Mid Span Y12@300 At Edge Y12@300 RCD 2000 Design Result Panel 1 Short Span Mid Span Y12@250B At Edge Y12@250T Difference
Slab Long Span Mid Span R12@175 At Edge R12@250 Long Span Mid Span Y12@300 At Edge Y12@300 Long Span Mid Span Y12@250B At Edge Y12@250T
Almost the same but they only differs in the spacing and in some cases in diameter of steel rods
Panel 2
Panel 2
Panel 2
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Page 180
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
Short Span Mid Span R12@250 At Edge R12@200 Slab Long Span Mid Span R12@150 At Edge R12@200
Total number of rods required differs in each of the beams and also
Beam 2
Beam 2
Beam 2
Page 181
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
Column 1 4Y20 + 2Y16 Links Y10@200 Almost the same but they differs in the
Column 3
Column 3
Column 3
Page 182
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
same but they differs in the spacing and in some cases in diameter of steel rods
Base
Base 10
Base 10
Base 10
Page 183
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
Y12@200 Y12@200
Y12@225 Y12@250
The above table shows the summary result of some selected structural elements from the two software and is compared with the manual design to ascertain or judge between the programs. The comparison shows that the design results of Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 has been found to be nearly the same with each other, but there is a little differences among the software. The differences occurred in the total number rods, diameter of the rods and mostly in the spacing.
With these reasons, one can say that the two Software can be strongly useful for the Design and Analysis of Structural elements and their results can be presented everywhere for practical application.
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Page 184
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
CHAPTER FIVE (CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS) 5.1 Conclusion The Analysis and Design of the structure was run using Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 and their results were found to be closely accurate, and the time taken used in the design using the two programs differs quite much, defending on the required parameters to be inputted on each of the software during the design, thereby making each having a different running speed.
The followings are the drawn up conclusions that have emanated from the research of this Project work:-
Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 Civilsoft 2010 instantaneously calculates and displays results within a short time and allows for editing where possible for both inputs and outputs data. While RCD 2000 program does not allow for editing, when design is complete, but starting a fresh design no editing work will be made. On the other hand, RCD 2000 takes much time while inputting data for the analysis and Design impacts, a lot of input data are required for the Design, hence it requires a series of manual calculation before embarking on the Design processes. The Civilsoft 2010 as a user-friendly program for the Computer Analysis, Design and Detailing of reinforced concrete design of structural elements has been successfully tested and found
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Page 185
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
adequate for use. However, it produces its result very fast and receiving the results in an understandable manner enables a great time saving, accuracy and hence, an optimized design. Generally, each of the two software that is, Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 can be used in the Design of Reinforced Concrete elements and can be presented anywhere with no doubt in terms of their accuracy. But to be frank and sincere, despite of its cost, Civilsoft 2010 can serve as the best in terms of accuracy, fastness, great time saving, well arranged and an optimized result output and the software version is upgraded from time to time.
The results of this project were in line with the expectations and objectives. 5.2 Recommendations The recommendations directly affiliated with the two programs are given as follows: The Civilsoft QuickCivilSeries as a widely used Civil/Structural Engineering Software both within and outside Nigeria has to reduce the cost of buying the software so as Students and young engineers can afford it. The RCD 2000 software has to be upgraded to reduce the difficulties when using the program, due to its inability to accept/edit errors. To continue developing, expanding and improving this software application hoping that one day, it will be a full structural analysis program catering for the analysis and design of frames, trusses and other structural elements. Other general recommendations regarding the developments and advances in computer applications and Civil Engineering:
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Page 186
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
The Department of Civil Engineering at Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic should introduce a computer lab specifically for the use of Civil Engineering Students so as to promote the use of Computer software in the Engineering profession.
The Department should also encourage conducting similar final year projects dealing with Computer applications in the future.
More emphasis regarding Computer Technology and applications to Engineering should be made at an academic level in different courses. This would broaden the intellect of students as well as expose them to new technologies in all Engineering disciplines.
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Page 187
Comparison Between Civilsoft 2010 and RCD 2000 in the Design of Three Storey Residential Building
REFERENCES 1. Victor O. Oyenuga.; Simplified Reinforced Concrete Design, 2 nd Edition ASROS Ltd., 2008 pages (2), (8-9), (81-102) 371,410 2. Mosley W. H. & Bungey J. H.; Reinforced Concrete Design, 4th Edition, Macmillan Press, 1990 Pages 56-58, 98-99 3. Ttti Chandigarh.; Civil Engineering Materials, McGraw - Hill Education India Ltd. 4. Manual for the Design of Reinforced Concrete Building Structures, Institute of Structural Engineers, 1985. Pages 182-191 5. Timoshenko S. P. & Young D. H.; Theory of Structures, 2nd Edition, McGraw Hill, 1965 6. Todd J. D.; Structural Theory & Analysis, 2nd Edition, Macmillan Press, 1981
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering Hassan Usman Katsina Polytechnic By Samaila Sani Saulawa
Page 188
4Y12 - 62 - 300 T2
4Y12 - 34 - 300 T2 7Y12 - 02 - 300 B2 12Y12 - 03 - 300 B1 7Y12 - 07 - 300 B2 11Y12 - 64 - 300 T1 17Y12 - 12 - 300 B2 29Y12 - 24 - 300 B1 11Y12 - 26 - 300 B2 6Y12 - 27 - 300 B1 9Y12 - 37 - 300 T1 24Y12 - 13 - 300 B1 17Y12 - 45 - 300 T1
33
34
38
19 63
44
43
46
48
47 14
16
45
13
79
78
8Y12 - 67 - 300 T2 4Y12 - 06 - 300 B2 06 4Y12 - 61 - 300 T2 61 9Y12 - 53 - 300 T2 9Y12 - 52 - 300 T1 6Y12 - 57 - 300 T2 6Y12 - 68 - 300 T1
67 07 12 81
13 80 08 66
50
51
17 56
57
52
53
54
55
G H
11Y12 - 22 - 300 B1 62
22
69
24
24
7Y12 - 51 - 300 T2 12Y12 - 18 - 300 B2 86
9Y12 - 55 - 300 T2
1000 2000
3000
2100 11600
2500
1000
Project Title
Consultants
84
85
82
73
37 19
20
19
41
35
36 27 21
77
39
10 40
D 7Y12 - 20 - 300 B1 4Y12 - 49 - 300 T2 8Y12 - 47 - 300 T1 E 11Y12 - 78 - 300 T1 15 9Y12 - 14 - 300 B1 4Y12 - 84 - 300 T2 11Y12 - 50 - 300 T1
49
83
72
4Y12 - 01 - 300 B2 01 4Y12 - 60 - 300 T2 60 6Y12 - 35 - 300 T1 5Y12 - 21 C - 300 B2 D 27Y12 - 19 - 300 B1
02
65
64
26
70
3000
11600 4
2100
7Y12 - 11 - 300 B2
2500
74
A B
30 27 28
31 10
32
04
76
09
11
10
71
75 05
10Y12 - 10 - 300 B1 C
42
11Y12 - 80 - 300 T1
14000 3500
18
G H
2000
23
68
25
8Y12 - 86 - 300 T2
beam details
Scale: SheetNo:
8/25/2012 6:00:51 PM
1:100
4Y12 - 62 - 300 T2
4Y12 - 34 - 300 T2 7Y12 - 02 - 300 B2 12Y12 - 03 - 300 B1 7Y12 - 07 - 300 B2 11Y12 - 64 - 300 T1 17Y12 - 12 - 300 B2 29Y12 - 24 - 300 B1 11Y12 - 26 - 300 B2 6Y12 - 27 - 300 B1 9Y12 - 37 - 300 T1 24Y12 - 13 - 300 B1 17Y12 - 45 - 300 T1
33
34
38
19 63
44
43
46
48
47 14
16
45
13
79
78
8Y12 - 67 - 300 T2 4Y12 - 06 - 300 B2 06 4Y12 - 61 - 300 T2 61 9Y12 - 53 - 300 T2 9Y12 - 52 - 300 T1 6Y12 - 57 - 300 T2 6Y12 - 68 - 300 T1
67 07 12 81
13 80 08 66
50
51
17 56
57
52
53
54
55
G H
11Y12 - 22 - 300 B1 62
22
69
24
24
7Y12 - 51 - 300 T2 12Y12 - 18 - 300 B2 86
9Y12 - 55 - 300 T2
1000 2000
3000
2100 11600
2500
1000
Project Title
Consultants
84
85
82
73
37 19
20
19
41
35
36 27 21
77
39
10 40
D 7Y12 - 20 - 300 B1 4Y12 - 49 - 300 T2 8Y12 - 47 - 300 T1 E 11Y12 - 78 - 300 T1 15 9Y12 - 14 - 300 B1 4Y12 - 84 - 300 T2 11Y12 - 50 - 300 T1
49
83
72
4Y12 - 01 - 300 B2 01 4Y12 - 60 - 300 T2 60 6Y12 - 35 - 300 T1 5Y12 - 21 C - 300 B2 D 27Y12 - 19 - 300 B1
02
65
64
26
70
3000
11600 4
2100
7Y12 - 11 - 300 B2
2500
74
A B
30 27 28
31 10
32
04
76
09
11
10
71
75 05
10Y12 - 10 - 300 B1 C
42
11Y12 - 80 - 300 T1
14000 3500
18
G H
2000
23
68
25
8Y12 - 86 - 300 T2
beam details
Scale: SheetNo:
8/25/2012 6:00:51 PM
1:100