Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Shelia Sargent-Martin
Teaching Reading &Language Art (F1032829) No. of responses = 15
Overall indicators Global Index 1. LEARNING ( = 0.92) 2. ENTHUSIASM ( = 0.84) 3. ORGANIZATION ( = 0.72) 4. GROUP INTERACTION ( = 0.87) 5. INDIVIDUAL RAPPORT ( = 0.44) 6. BREADTH ( = 0.9) 7. EXAMINATIONS ( = 0.86) 8. ASSIGNMENTS ( = 0.97) 9. OVERALL ( = 0.97)
+
av.=4.58 dev.=0.64
+
av.=4.59 dev.=0.66
+
av.=4.75 dev.=0.53
+
av.=4.33 dev.=0.81
+
av.=4.89 dev.=0.32
+
av.=4.72 dev.=0.61
+
av.=4.64 dev.=0.63
+
av.=4.52 dev.=0.7
+
av.=4.21 dev.=0.74
+
av.=4.56 dev.=0.74
Legend
Question text
Std. Dev.
Mean
Median
Quantile
25%
0%
50%
0%
25%
Right pole
1
Scale
4
Histogram
1. LEARNING
1.1)
0%
Strongly disagree
0%
1
1.2)
2 0%
0%
Strongly disagree
1
1.3)
2 0%
5 60%
Strongly agree
0%
Strongly disagree
13.3% 26.7%
02/14/2011
Page 1
You have learned and understood the subject materials in this course
0%
Strongly disagree
0%
6.7%
20%
73.3%
Strongly agree
2. ENTHUSIASM
2.1)
0%
Strongly disagree
0%
0%
13.3% 86.7%
Strongly agree
1
2.2)
2 0%
3 0%
0%
Strongly disagree
21.4% 78.6%
Strongly agree
1
2.3)
2 0%
5 80%
Strongly agree
0%
Strongly disagree
6.7% 13.3%
1
2.4)
2 0%
0%
Strongly disagree
3. ORGANIZATION
3.1)
0%
Strongly disagree
0%
7.1%
50%
42.9%
Strongly agree
1
3.2)
2 0%
0%
Strongly disagree
1
3.3)
2 0%
5 60%
Strongly agree
Proposed objectives agreed with those actually taught so you knew where the course was going
0%
Strongly disagree
13.3% 26.7%
1
3.4)
2 0%
7.1%
Strongly disagree
4. GROUP INTERACTION
4.1)
0%
Strongly disagree
0%
0%
7.1% 92.9%
Strongly agree
1
4.2)
2 0%
3 0%
0%
Strongly disagree
7.1% 92.9%
Strongly agree
02/14/2011
Page 2
Students were encouraged to ask questions and were given meaningful answers
0%
Strongly disagree
0%
0%
15.4% 84.6%
Strongly agree
1
4.4)
2 0%
3 0%
Students were encouraged to express their own ideas and/or question the instructor
0%
Strongly disagree
14.3% 85.7%
Strongly agree
5. INDIVIDUAL RAPPORT
5.1)
0%
Strongly disagree
7.1%
0%
14.3% 78.6%
Strongly agree
1
5.2)
2 0%
3 0%
0%
Strongly disagree
21.4% 78.6%
Strongly agree
1
5.3)
2 0%
5 80%
Strongly agree
0%
Strongly disagree
6.7% 13.3%
1
5.4)
2 0%
5 80%
Strongly agree
Instructor was adequately accessible to students during office hours or after class
0%
Strongly disagree
6.7% 13.3%
6. BREADTH
6.1)
0%
Strongly disagree
0%
1
6.2)
2 0%
0%
Strongly disagree
1
6.3)
2 0%
5 80%
Strongly agree
Instructor presented points of view other than his/ her own when appropriate
0%
Strongly disagree
6.7% 13.3%
1
6.4)
2 0%
0%
Strongly disagree
7. EXAMINATIONS
7.1)
0%
Strongly disagree
0%
02/14/2011
Page 3
0%
Strongly disagree
0%
6.7% 13.3%
80%
Strongly agree
1
7.3)
2 0%
0%
Strongly disagree
8. ASSIGNMENTS
8.1)
0%
Strongly disagree
0%
20%
40%
40%
Strongly agree
1
8.2)
2 0%
3 14.3%
4 50%
5 35.7%
Strongly agree
0%
Strongly disagree
9. OVERALL
9.1)
Compared with other courses you have taken at BSC, this course was...
0%
Very poor
0%
13.3% 26.7%
60%
Very good
1
9.2)
2 0%
Compared with other instructors you have had at BSC, this instructor was...
0%
Very poor
1
9.3)
2 0%
Compared with other instructors you have had in your major, this instructor was...
0%
Very poor
Instructions unclear. Need to give assignments earlier Love Dr. Martin-she's the best addition to the Ed dept that we've had in the 4 yrs I've been here. Hope she sticks around for the new teacher ed students. This course was interesting however I felt that the instructor was so unsure about give solid answers on things it became pointless to bring things up. she needs to be more sure of herself Very pleased!
02/14/2011
Page 4
100% 75%
64%
100% 75%
71%
50% 25%
7% 29%
50%
n = 14
25%
21% 7%
n = 14
25%
13%
27%
You have learned and understood the subject materials in this course
Strongly disagree Strongly agree
av. = 4.67
73%
100% 75%
87%
dev. = 0.62
50%
n = 15
25%
13%
n = 15
25%
av. = 4.6
73%
100% 75%
dev. = 0.74
50%
50% 43%
n = 15
25%
13% 13%
n = 15
25%
7%
n = 14
Proposed objectives agreed with those actually taught so you knew where the course was going
Strongly disagree Strongly agree
100% 75%
100% 75%
100% 75%
50% 25%
13%
53% 33%
50%
60%
64%
50%
n = 15
25%
13%
27%
n = 15
25%
Students were encouraged to ask questions and were given meaningful answers
Strongly disagree Strongly agree
100%
93%
100%
93%
75% 50%
n = 14
25%
7%
n = 14
25%
02/14/2011
Page 5
Shelia Sargent-Martin, Teaching Reading &Language Art Students were encouraged to express their own ideas and/or question the instructor
Strongly disagree Strongly agree
Instructor made students feel welcome in seeking help/ advice in or outside of class
Strongly disagree Strongly agree
n = 14
25%
14% 7%
n = 14
25%
Instructor was adequately accessible to students during office hours or after class
Strongly disagree Strongly agree
100% 75%
71%
50%
n = 15
25%
13%
n = 15
25%
Instructor presented points of view other than his/her own when appropriate
Strongly disagree Strongly agree
100% 75%
64%
100% 75%
67%
50% 25%
7% 29%
50%
n = 14
25%
13%
n = 15
25%
27%
100% 75%
100% 75%
80%
50% 25%
13% 33%
53%
50%
n = 15
25%
13%
n = 15
25%
14%
29%
Compared with other courses you have taken at BSC, this course was...
Very poor Very good
100% 75%
100% 75%
50%
40% 40%
50%
25%
20%
n = 15
25%
n = 14
25%
13%
27%
02/14/2011
Page 6
Shelia Sargent-Martin, Teaching Reading &Language Art Compared with other instructors you have had at BSC, this instructor was...
Very poor Very good
Compared with other instructors you have had in your major, this instructor was...
Very poor Very good
av. = 4.6
73%
100% 75%
av. = 4.6
73%
dev. = 0.74
50%
dev. = 0.74 n = 15
13% 13%
n = 15
25%
02/14/2011
Page 7
Profile
Subunit: Name of the instructor: Name of the course: (Name of the survey) Education Shelia Sargent-Martin Teaching Reading &Language Art
1.1)
You found the course intellectually challenging and stimulating You have learned something which you consider valuable Your interest in the subject has increased as a consequence of this course You have learned and understood the subject materials in this course Instructor was enthusiastic about teaching the course Instructor was dynamic and energetic in conducting the course Instructor enhanced presentations with the use of humor Instructor's style of presentation held your interest during class Instructor's explanations were clear Course materials were well-prepared and carefully explained Proposed objectives agreed with those actually taught so you knew where the course was going Instructor gave lectures that facilitated taking notes Students were encouraged to participate in class discussions Students were invited to share their ideas and knowledge Students were encouraged to ask questions and were given meaningful answers Students were encouraged to express their own ideas and/or question the instructor Instructor was friendly toward individual students Instructor made students feel welcome in seeking help/advice in or outside of class Instructor had genuine interest in individual students Instructor was adequately accessible to students during office hours or after class Instructor contrasted the implications of various theories Instructor presented the background or origin of ideas/concepts developed in class Instructor presented points of view other than his/her own when appropriate Instructor adequately discussed current developments in the field
Strongly disagree Strongly disagree Strongly disagree Strongly disagree Strongly disagree Strongly disagree Strongly disagree Strongly disagree Strongly disagree Strongly disagree Strongly disagree Strongly disagree Strongly disagree Strongly disagree Strongly disagree Strongly disagree Strongly disagree Strongly disagree Strongly disagree Strongly disagree Strongly disagree Strongly disagree Strongly disagree Strongly disagree
Strongly agree Strongly agree Strongly agree Strongly agree Strongly agree Strongly agree Strongly agree Strongly agree Strongly agree Strongly agree Strongly agree Strongly agree Strongly agree Strongly agree Strongly agree Strongly agree Strongly agree Strongly agree Strongly agree Strongly agree Strongly agree Strongly agree Strongly agree Strongly agree
n=14 av.=4.57 n=14 av.=4.64 n=15 av.=4.47 n=15 av.=4.67 n=15 av.=4.87 n=14 av.=4.79 n=15 av.=4.73 n=15 av.=4.6 n=14 av.=4.36 n=15 av.=4.2 n=15 av.=4.47 n=14 av.=4.29 n=14 av.=4.93 n=14 av.=4.93 n=13 av.=4.85 n=14 av.=4.86 n=14 av.=4.64 n=14 av.=4.79 n=15 av.=4.73 n=15 av.=4.73 n=14 av.=4.64 n=14 av.=4.57 n=15 av.=4.73 n=15 av.=4.6
1.2)
1.3)
1.4)
2.1)
2.2)
2.3)
2.4)
3.1)
3.2)
3.3)
3.4)
4.1)
4.2)
4.3)
4.4)
5.1)
5.2)
5.3)
5.4)
6.1)
6.2)
6.3)
6.4)
02/14/2011
Page 8
7.1)
Feedback on examinations/graded materials was valuable Methods of evaluating student work were fair and appropriate Examinations/graded materials tested course content as emphasized by the instructor Required readings/texts were valuable Readings, homework, etc. contributed to appreciation and understanding of subject Compared with other courses you have taken at BSC, this course was... Compared with other instructors you have had at BSC, this instructor was... Compared with other instructors you have had in your major, this instructor was...
Strongly disagree Strongly disagree Strongly disagree Strongly disagree Strongly disagree Very poor Very poor Very poor
Strongly agree Strongly agree Strongly agree Strongly agree Strongly agree Very good Very good Very good
n=15 av.=4.4 n=15 av.=4.73 n=14 av.=4.43 n=15 av.=4.2 n=14 av.=4.21 n=15 av.=4.47 n=15 av.=4.6 n=15 av.=4.6
7.2)
7.3)
8.1)
8.2)
9.1)
9.2)
9.3)
02/14/2011
Page 9
Profile
Subunit: Name of the instructor: Name of the course: (Name of the survey) Education Shelia Sargent-Martin Teaching Reading &Language Art
1. LEARNING 2. ENTHUSIASM 3. ORGANIZATION 4. GROUP INTERACTION 5. INDIVIDUAL RAPPORT 6. BREADTH 7. EXAMINATIONS 8. ASSIGNMENTS 9. OVERALL
+ + + + + + + + +
02/14/2011
Page 10