Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Shelia Sargent-Martin
The Reading Process (SP1042772) No. of responses = 16
Overall indicators
Global Index
1. LEARNING ( = 0.99) 2. ENTHUSIASM ( = 0.96) 3. ORGANIZATION ( = 0.94) 4. GROUP INTERACTION ( = 1) 5. INDIVIDUAL RAPPORT ( = 1) 6. BREADTH ( = 0.96) 7. EXAMINATIONS ( = 0.98) 8. ASSIGNMENTS ( = 0.97) 9. OVERALL ( = 0.95)
av.=4.42 dev.=0.96 av.=4.16 dev.=1.03 av.=4.44 dev.=1 av.=4.2 dev.=1.11 av.=4.54 dev.=0.99 av.=4.53 dev.=0.99 av.=4.42 dev.=0.97 av.=4.48 dev.=0.96 av.=4.41 dev.=0.9 av.=4.57 dev.=0.7
Legend
Question text
Mean 0% 50%
Median 0%
Quantile 25%
Right pole
1 Scale
4 Histogram
1. LEARNING
1.1)
0%
Strongly disagree
6.7%
20%
26.7%
46.7%
Strongly agree
1
1.2)
2 7.7%
3 23.1%
4 23.1%
5 46.2%
Strongly agree
0%
Strongly disagree
03/08/2013
Page 1
0%
Strongly disagree
6.7%
26.7%
13.3%
53.3%
Strongly agree
1
1.4)
2 6.7%
3 20%
4 13.3%
5 60%
Strongly agree
You have learned and understood the subject materials in this course
0%
Strongly disagree
2. ENTHUSIASM
2.1)
0%
Strongly disagree
6.7%
13.3%
0%
80%
Strongly agree
1
2.2)
2 6.7%
3 13.3%
4 0%
5 80%
Strongly agree
0%
Strongly disagree
1
2.3)
2 6.7%
3 13.3%
4 0%
5 80%
Strongly agree
0%
Strongly disagree
1
2.4)
2 6.3%
3 25%
4 12.5%
5 56.3%
Strongly agree
0%
Strongly disagree
3. ORGANIZATION
3.1)
0%
Strongly disagree
14.3%
21.4%
7.1%
57.1%
Strongly agree
1
3.2)
2 20%
3 13.3%
4 20%
5 46.7%
Strongly agree
0%
Strongly disagree
1
3.3)
2 6.3%
3 12.5%
4 12.5%
5 68.8%
Strongly agree
Proposed objectives agreed with those actually taught so you knew where the course was going
0%
Strongly disagree
1
3.4)
2 6.7%
3 20%
4 6.7%
5 66.7%
Strongly agree
0%
Strongly disagree
4. GROUP INTERACTION
4.1)
0%
Strongly disagree
7.1%
7.1%
0%
85.7%
Strongly agree
03/08/2013
Page 2
0%
Strongly disagree
7.1%
14.3%
0%
78.6%
Strongly agree
1
4.3)
2 6.7%
3 13.3%
4 0%
5 80%
Strongly agree
Students were encouraged to ask questions and were given meaningful answers
0%
Strongly disagree
1
4.4)
2 7.1%
3 14.3%
4 0%
5 78.6%
Strongly agree
Students were encouraged to express their own ideas and/or question the instructor
0%
Strongly disagree
5. INDIVIDUAL RAPPORT
5.1)
0%
Strongly disagree
7.1%
14.3%
0%
78.6%
Strongly agree
1
5.2)
2 6.7%
3 13.3%
4 0%
5 80%
Strongly agree
0%
Strongly disagree
1
5.3)
2 6.7%
3 13.3%
4 0%
5 80%
Strongly agree
0%
Strongly disagree
1
5.4)
2 6.3%
3 12.5%
4 0%
5 81.3%
Strongly agree
Instructor was adequately accessible to students during office hours or after class
0%
Strongly disagree
6. BREADTH
6.1)
0%
Strongly disagree
6.3%
18.8%
18.8%
56.3%
Strongly agree
1
6.2)
2 6.3%
3 12.5%
4 12.5%
5 68.8%
Strongly agree
0%
Strongly disagree
1
6.3)
2 6.3%
3 12.5%
4 6.3%
5 75%
Strongly agree
Instructor presented points of view other than his/ her own when appropriate
0%
Strongly disagree
1
6.4)
2 6.3%
3 12.5%
4 6.3%
5 75%
Strongly agree
0%
Strongly disagree
03/08/2013
Page 3
7. EXAMINATIONS
7.1)
0%
Strongly disagree
6.3%
12.5%
12.5%
68.8%
Strongly agree
1
7.2)
2 6.3%
3 12.5%
4 0%
5 81.3%
Strongly agree
0%
Strongly disagree
1
7.3)
2 6.3%
3 12.5%
4 12.5%
5 68.8%
Strongly agree
0%
Strongly disagree
8. ASSIGNMENTS
8.1)
0%
Strongly disagree
0%
15.4%
15.4%
69.2%
Strongly agree
1
8.2)
2 6.3%
3 18.8%
4 12.5%
5 62.5%
Strongly agree
0%
Strongly disagree
9. OVERALL
9.1)
Compared with other courses you have taken at BSC, this course was...
0%
Very poor
0%
13.3%
26.7%
60%
Very good
1
9.2)
2 0%
3 6.7%
4 20%
5 73.3%
Very good
Compared with other instructors you have had at BSC, this instructor was...
0%
Very poor
1
9.3)
2 0%
3 12.5%
4 18.8%
5 68.8%
Very good
Compared with other instructors you have had in your major, this instructor was...
0%
Very poor
Bluefield State College needs more professors from Tazewell County Schools like Mrs. Martin. She has a good class and did a good job. Promote her to dept. chairperson. I really enjoyed this class. Dr. Martin is a great instructor She is very helpful and is very nice to everyone.
03/08/2013
Page 4
100% 75%
100% 75%
100% 75%
50%
47%
50%
46% 27% 20% 8%
50%
53%
25%
n = 15
25%
n = 13
23% 23%
25%
27% 13%
n = 15
You have learned and understood the subject materials in this course
Strongly disagree Strongly agree
n = 15
25%
13%
n = 15
25%
100% 75%
100% 75%
50%
56%
50%
57%
n = 15
25%
25% 13%
n = 16
25%
Proposed objectives agreed with those actually taught so you knew where the course was going
Strongly disagree Strongly agree
100% 75%
100% 75%
69%
100% 75%
67%
50%
47%
50%
50%
25%
20% 13% 20%
n = 15
25%
13% 13%
n = 16
25%
Students were encouraged to ask questions and were given meaningful answers
Strongly disagree Strongly agree
n = 14
25%
14% 7%
n = 14
25%
03/08/2013
Page 5
Shelia Sargent-Martin, The Reading Process Students were encouraged to express their own ideas and/or question the instructor
Strongly disagree Strongly agree
Instructor made students feel welcome in seeking help/ advice in or outside of class
Strongly disagree Strongly agree
n = 14
25%
14% 7%
n = 14
25%
Instructor was adequately accessible to students during office hours or after class
Strongly disagree Strongly agree
100% 75%
50%
56%
n = 15
25%
13%
n = 16
25%
19% 19%
n = 16
Instructor presented points of view other than his/her own when appropriate
Strongly disagree Strongly agree
100% 75%
69%
av. = 4.5
75%
100% 75%
av. = 4.5
75%
dev. = 0.97
50%
dev. = 0.97 n = 16
13%
50% 25%
13% 13%
n = 16
25%
13%
n = 16
25%
100% 75%
69%
100% 75%
69%
50% 25%
13% 13%
50%
n = 16
25%
13%
n = 16
25%
Compared with other courses you have taken at BSC, this course was...
Very poor Very good
100% 75%
69%
100% 75%
63%
50% 25%
15% 15%
50%
n = 13
25%
19% 13%
n = 16
25%
13%
27%
03/08/2013
Page 6
Shelia Sargent-Martin, The Reading Process Compared with other instructors you have had at BSC, this instructor was...
Very poor Very good
Compared with other instructors you have had in your major, this instructor was...
Very poor Very good
av. = 4.67
73%
100% 75%
av. = 4.56
69%
dev. = 0.62
50%
dev. = 0.73 n = 16
n = 15
25%
13% 19%
03/08/2013
Page 7
Profile
Subunit: Name of the instructor: Name of the course: (Name of the survey) Education Shelia Sargent-Martin The Reading Process (SP1042772)
1. LEARNING
1.1)
1.2)
You found the course intellectually challenging and stimulating You have learned something which you consider valuable Your interest in the subject has increased as a consequence of this course You have learned and understood the subject materials in this course
1.3)
1.4)
2. ENTHUSIASM
2.1)
Instructor was enthusiastic about teaching the course Instructor was dynamic and energetic in conducting the course Instructor enhanced presentations with the use of humor Instructor's style of presentation held your interest during class
2.2)
2.3)
2.4)
3. ORGANIZATION
3.1)
Instructor's explanations were clear Course materials were wellprepared and carefully explained Proposed objectives agreed with those actually taught so you knew where the course Instructor gave lectures that facilitated taking notes
3.2)
3.3)
3.4)
4. GROUP INTERACTION
4.1)
4.2)
Students were encouraged to participate in class discussions Students were invited to share their ideas and knowledge Students were encouraged to ask questions and were given meaningful answers
4.3)
03/08/2013
Page 8
4.4)
Students were encouraged to express their own ideas and/ or question the instructor
Strongly disagree
Strongly agree
n=14
av.=4.50
md=5.00
dev.=1.02
5. INDIVIDUAL RAPPORT
5.1)
Instructor was friendly toward individual students Instructor made students feel welcome in seeking help/ advice in or outside of class Instructor had genuine interest in individual students Instructor was adequately accessible to students during office hours or after class
5.2)
5.3)
5.4)
6. BREADTH
6.1)
6.2)
6.3)
6.4)
Instructor contrasted the implications of various theories Instructor presented the background or origin of ideas/ concepts developed in class Instructor presented points of view other than his/her own when appropriate Instructor adequately discussed current developments in the field
7. EXAMINATIONS
7.1)
Feedback on examinations/ graded materials was valuable Methods of evaluating student work were fair and appropriate Examinations/graded materials tested course content as emphasized by the
7.2)
7.3)
8. ASSIGNMENTS
8.1)
Required readings/texts were valuable Readings, homework, etc. contributed to appreciation and understanding of subject
n=13 n=16
av.=4.54 av.=4.31
md=5.00 md=5.00
dev.=0.78 dev.=1.01
8.2)
9. OVERALL
9.1)
9.2)
9.3)
Compared with other courses you have taken at BSC, this course was... Compared with other instructors you have had at BSC, this instructor was... Compared with other instructors you have had in your major, this instructor
03/08/2013
Page 9
Profile
Subunit: Name of the instructor: Name of the course: (Name of the survey) Education Shelia Sargent-Martin The Reading Process (SP1042772)
1. LEARNING 2. ENTHUSIASM 3. ORGANIZATION 4. GROUP INTERACTION 5. INDIVIDUAL RAPPORT 6. BREADTH 7. EXAMINATIONS 8. ASSIGNMENTS 9. OVERALL
+ + + + + + + + +
03/08/2013
Page 10