Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Predominant technologies
Key authors
"...from teaching children and adolescents to teaching adults, from the admission of small to much larger numbers of students, from traditional types of students to new types of students, from oral communication to mediated communication, and from traditional functions of higher education to new functions" (Peters, 2010, p. 69). Interest in interdisciplinary thinking (Peters, 2010, p. 71). Andragogy Adult learning theory Systems Approach/theory Constructivism (situated learning) Transactional distance (dialogue, structure, and learner autonomy) - see additional details below Emphasis on dialogue: -Humanistic pedagogies (Peters, 2004) - Education addresses person's "communicative competence" and understanding of roles (Peters, 2004, pp. 39-40) Emphasis on structure: -Pedagogies of formal stages (Herbart, as cited in Peters, 2004) -Structural communication (Hodgson, 1974 as cited in Peters, 2004) -Structures writing/mapping (Horn, 1973, as cited in Peters, 2004) -Raising learning from "automatic" to "conscious/reflective" and rooted in Gestalt thinking (Peters, 2004, p. 44) Emphasis on autonomy: -based on Kant (as cited in Peters, 2004, p. 48) as well as Moore and Knowles -more readily adaptable to modern trends and looking towards future (Peters, 2004, p. 49 or 50?) -education as empowerment to rational self-determination (Klafki, 1986, as cited in Peters, 2004) Large-scale, materials-oriented open universities More open policies, such as open admissions Government sponsorship Cooperation of broadcast corporations Single mode universities Inter-institutional collaboration Consortiums Consortia-type ventures Systematic organization of courses External studies departments in established universities (Shale, 2010, p. 92) Support systems and networks of regional centers (Shale, 2010, p.96 and Bates, 2011). In some cases, coupling of DE with compulsory summer school (Shale, 2010, p. 96) Instructional design/learning situated within larger systems such as educational, social, global systems (Moore PPT slides shared by Prof. Huelsmann) In some cases, courses offered through establish universities' media departments (Shale, 2010, p.97) From small numbers to large numbers of students More one-way mediated communication with broadcast Individualized approach Course design may be tailored to capacity for learner autonomy (Moore PPT provided by Prof Hueslmann) Learner centered (Peters, 2010, p. 66) Collaborative learning (Peters, 2010, p. 66) Primarily asynchronous learning Learning Resources Learner Support Teams of course developers: subject matter experts, instructional designers, media specialists, graphic designers, editors, technical support (Shale, 2010, p.95) ADDIE concept of instructional design - teams of course developers (Bates, 2011) Individual universities "adapted to the socio-economical and political conditions of their country" (Peters, 2010, p. 62)
Still primarily correspondence, but the following technologies were explored as supplements. Different technologies emphasized on a regional/national basis based on cultural differences/expectations (Peters, 2010, p. 74): Radio Audio -Teleconferencing (utilizing satellite telecommunication) Television - Telecourses Video and audio cassettes Multi-media Self-teaching course material (Peters, 2010, p. 76) Teams of course developers: subject matter experts, instructional designers, media specialists, graphic designers, editors, technical support (Shale, 2010, p.95) - ADDIE concept of instructional design - teams of course developers (Bates, 2011) Learner Support Learning Resources Learner centered (Peters, 2010, p. 66) Individualized approach Collaborative learning (Peters, 2010, p. 66) Primarily asynchronous learning Course design may be tailored to capacity for learner autonomy (Moore PPT provided by Prof Hueslmann) More one-way mediated communication with broadcast coupled with correspondence Instructional design/learning situated within larger systems such as educational, social, global systems (Moore PPT slides shared by Prof. Huelsmann) New, unique forms of creating and acquiring knowledge in a technological-organizational system (Peters, 2010, p. 71) Curricular flexibility (Peters, 2010, p. 77) Methodological flexibility (Peters, 2010, p. 77) Malcolm Knowles: developed the andragogy theory Bullen: applied andragogy theory specifically to DE Otto Peters: developed the theory about the Industrialization of education or industrialized education theory Michael G. Moore: developed the transactional distance theory -transactional distance theory influenced by Carl Rogers' theories on tutorial care (per Peters, 2004) Ludwig von Bertalanffy: developed the systems approach/theory Jerome Bruner: Constructivism learning theory Moore & Knowles (2005): further developed systems approach Rumble (1997): applied systems approach specifically to DE structure
Predominant technologies
Key authors
Learner controlled learning vs. teacher lead; interaction, shared knowledge Online learning as representation of post-industrial era (Swan, 2010) Online learning as way to facilitate lifelong learning that extends beyond the classroom (Anderson, 2011) Online learning as fundamentally adapted to "competitive industrialized 'knowledge and learning society'" (Peters, 2010, p.141) Interrelationship between the individual and the software leads to increased interest in and motivation for autonomous learning (Peters, 2010, p.148) Limitless resources accessible instantaneously via internet - most favorable environment thus far "for independent and automatic learning" (Peters, 2010, p. 148) Virtual seminars as way to simultaneously maintain a structured environment but individualize it, make students active participants, and still allow student autonomy (Peters, 2010, p.151) Four models: (1) one-alone method (the WWW paradigm), (2) one-to-one method (the email paradigm), (3) one-to-many method (bulletin-board paradigm) and (4) the many-to-many method (the computer conferencing paradigm) (Morten Flate Paulsen,1997, p.120 as cited in Peters, 2010, p.152) Interest in "re-engineering" of DE from heteronomous to autonomous learning (Collis,1996, p.XXII as cited in Peters, 2010, p.153) Pedagogical versus technological determinism (Anderson & Dron, 2011, p.81) Online tools as way to facilitate collaborative learning (Garrison, 2009) Open universities, dual mode institutions Empire State College of the State of New York: pioneer in entirely autonomous learning (Peters, 2001, pp. 224-229, as cited in Peters, 2010, p. 152). Flipped classroom as described in (http://www.knewton.com/flipped-classroom/). Remote Education Access- Learning and teaching (Satelite System- computer connected to a network eg: cloud) Increasing the quality of learning Reducing the time of attaining educational goals Increasing efficiency Increasing independence of users and flexible education Reduction of cost without effecting quality Eliminating limitations on time and place (Ahvaz, 2009. p2) Management- better options to supervision and control
Combination of Teaching & Learning: High quality DE exploits all 3 generations of DE pedagogy (cognitive-behaviorist, social constructivist & connectivist) (Anderson & Dron, 2011) Blended learning as way to purposefully maximize benefits of both face-to-face and online learning - promotes active, self-directed learning & flexibility (Vaughan, 2010) Online "knowledge building community" among students (Scardamalia & Bereiter, 1992 as cited in Peters, 2010, p. 151) in accordance with radical structuralist learning model (cf. Siebert, 1996, p.16 as cited in Peters, 2010, p.151) Regulated learning versus self-directed, autonomous learning (Peters, 2010) Idea that learners should be competent in: content, methods of obtaining knowledge and skilled at cooperation with others (Peters, 2010, p.141) Interaction equivalency theorem (Anderson, 2003; Anderson, 2011): formal learning can occur as long as one of the three forms of interaction (student-teacher, student-student, student-content) is maximized Communities of Inquiry: cognitive (using practical inquiry model), social & teacher presence (Garrison, Anderson & Archer, 2000) Social Constructivism: teaching presence extends beyond facilitation of learning; focused on guidance and evaluation of authentic tasks performed in a realistic context Connectivism: blending of formal & informal learning (Anderson, 2011); teaching by example teacher is not responsible for defining, generating or assigning content - learner and teacher collaborate to create the content of study, and in the process re-create the learning content for future use by others (Anderson & Dron, 2011. pp. 83-88) Ways of Teaching: Pedagogy of enablement instead of pedagogy of instruction (Arnold, 1993, p.53) as cited in (Peters, 2010, p.153) For assessment and research purposes, online communication provides a thorough record of student-initiated communication (Peters, 2010, p.150) Extended support system (Peters, 2010) Extended interactivity quantitatively and qualitatively (Peters,2010) Integrated and purposeful multisensory learning (Peters,2010) Ways of Learning: Interactivity as a way to utilize all three ways of learning as originally explained by Bruner (1973): enactive, iconic and symbolic (Peters,2010, pp. 144-146) Interactivity as a way to achieve "mastery learning" with multiple forms of learning and assessment, as originally explained by Bates (1995) and cited in (Peters,2010. p. 46) Application of knowledge in experimental, virtual situations (Peters, 2010, p.146) Self-planned, self-organized and self-assessed, autonomous learning (Peters, 2010, p.147) Three types of digitized learning: learning in hypertext, network-based learning, learning through virtual communication (Peters, 2010, p.148) Non-linear and non-sequential learning (Peterrs, 2010, p.149) Four types of searching (new elements of learning behavior): (1) "targeted browsing picking things up along the way," (2) "targeted browsing in which important information is found which was not the subject of the search," (3) "random browsing," and (4) "associative browsing" (Kuhlen,1991, p.129 as cited in Peters, 2010, p.149) Learning which does not aim at declared and defined learning targets and which cannot be tested by means of appropriate tests" (Peters, 2010, p.149) Informal student-student virtual communication with online coursework as the hub "can have a positive feedback effect on self-directed learning" (Peters, 2010, p.151) Partnership learning, group learning, communicative learning (Peters, 2010, p.151) Structure of learning determined by "searching, finding, selecting, evaluating and applying information" (Peters, 2010, p. 150) "Path finding" (Peters, 2010, p.150) Other new learning behavior categories: "browsing, scanning, searching, exploring and wandering" (Canter,Rivers & Storrs, 1985 as cited in Peters, 2010, pp. 149-150) "Browsing" and "navigating" as two new forms of learning (Peters, 2010, p.149)
Predominant technologies
Digitized learning - allows computer to be used for: communication, transmission, display, search, access analysis, storage, virtual reality and management (Peters, 2012, p. 121) Synchronous and asynchronous (real time and learning at a distance) (Anderson, 2011) Increasing emphasis on internet; computer-to-computer virtual communication (Peters, 2010, p. 150) Video-conferencing-this method allows interaction that is similar to face to face engagement. Continued use of video, television, radio, text. Social networks: Twitter (micro-blogging), Facebook, Linkedin (Anderson, 2011) Social bookmarking (Diigo) (Anderson, 2011): Blogging-(Wikis) (Anderson, 2011): MOOCs: massive open online courses (Anderson, 2011) Online learning management systems:Blackboard, webCT, Moodle,Webtycho and Sakai etc. (Anderson, 2011) Online "guided tours" (Peters, 2010) Hypertexts: "text blocks representing 'cognitive units'" (Peters, 2010, p. 148) Online networks linked by nodes (Peters, 2010, p. 149) Electronic works of reference: online encyclopedias, newspaper digital archives, digital and virtual libraries, digitized texts and illustrations, virtual academic journals (Peters, 2010, p. 150; Ahvan, 2009, p. 2) Computer conferencing and virtual seminars (remote access-virtual classroom) (Peters, 2010, p. 151) D. Randy Garrison: communities of inquiry Terry Anderson: connectivism, interaction equivalency theorem, communities of inquiry Terumi Miyazoe: interaction equivalency theorem Otto Peters: digitized learning environment as opportunity for either improved heteronomous learning or entirely new form of autonomous learning Anthony Bates: e-Learning is still a continuation of traditional forms of learning George Siemens & Stephen Downes: connectivism Morten Flate Paulsen: four models of digital learning environments Rolf Arnold: pedagogy of enablement Collins: demands "re-engineering" of DE Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G.: systemized online learning in DE. Vaughan (2010): optimizing blended learning in higher ed Ahvaz (2009) Archer: communities of inquiry
Key authors
Complexity theory: "organizational structures should help us to surf at the 'edge of chaos,' not function to eliminate or constrain the creative potential of actors engaged at this juncture... this understanding can guide us to create and manage these complex environments not with a goal of controlling or even completely understanding learning, but with a goal of creating systems in which learning emerges rapidly and profoundly... encourages us to think of learning contexts (classrooms, online learning cohorts, etc.) as entities themselves... search for interventions that promote healthy adaptation and the emergence of cultures, tools, and languages that produce healthy human beings" (Anderson, 2010, p. 29); "surf [the] wave of equal opportunity and danger" (Anderson, 2010, p. 29) that arises from using "disruptive technologies... in once stable systems" (Christensen, 1997 as cited in Anderson, 2010, p. 29) Connectivist theory: "need for formal education to expand beyond classrooms and bounded learning management systems to embrace and become involved with the informal" (Downes, 2006 as cited in Anderson, 2010, p. 34). Three contexts: (1) familiar group (classes): closed environments, strong leadership from teacher/group owner, often temporally bounded; (2) networks: engage students, alumni and public in networked learning opportunities, fluid, less temporally bound; (3) collectives: large-scale search/filter activities (i.e. Google search), use of tagging services to create paths to particularly useful resources (Dron & Anderson, 2007 as cited in Anderson, 2010, pp. 35-36) Heutagogy: "systems approach that recognises the system-environment interface" (Hase & Kenyon, 2000) Heutagogy: "knowing how to learn... a form of self-determined learning -- expanding on andragogy -- in which the learner decides the path of learning, what will be learned and how it will be learned" (Hase & Kenyon, 2000 as cited in Huelsmann, 2013); capable people and capable organisations (S. Hase and C. Kenyon, 2001); "renounces... teacher dependency" entirely (Anderson, 2010, p. 33). Built upon humanism (Hase & Kenyon, 2000). Facilitation of life-long learning that can be naturally assimilated into an individual's own life (Rogers, 1969 as cited in Hase & Kenyon, 2000). Teacher should provide resources but student should identify what critical issues/questions are of interest to them and puruse those. Assessment is "more of a learning experience rather than a means to measure attainment" (Hansen & Kenyon, 2000). Related to heutagogy: -double loop learning (Argyris & Schon, 1996 as cited in Hase & Kenyon, 2000) -action learning (Kemmis & McTaggart, 1998, as cited in Hase & Kenyon, 2000) -action research (Hase & Kenyon, 2000) -capability (Stephenson & Weil, 1992, as cited in Hase & Kenyon, 2000) -work-based learning (Graves, 1993; Hase, 1998 as cited in Hase & Kenyon, 2000) -contract learning (Hase & Kenyon, 2000) Connectivism: "knowing where to find information... learning occurs as the result of creating environments... in which connections can be made to form communities of knowledge" (Siemens & Downes, as cited in Huelsmann, 2013); network comprised of "learning resources, machines that both store and generate information, and people" (Anderson, 2010, p. 34). Learners synthesize personalized knowledge by "connecting it to the ideas and artifacts of others in their networks" (Anderson, 2010, p. 34). Focus on skill in "creat[ing] paths to knowledge when it is needed" (Anderson, 2010, p. 34). Knowledge and learning "...can exist outside of a human being in the databases, devices, tools, and communities within which a learner acts" (Siemens, 2005 as cited in Anderson, 2010, p. 34) Complexity theory: "teaches us to look for the emergent behviours that arise when autonomous, yet interdependent organisms interact with each other... theorists look for and attempt to predict 'transformations or phase transitions that provide the markers for growth, change or learning'" (Horn, 2008, as cited in Anderson, 2010, p. 28); "complexity theorists seek to understand features of the environment, and especially the social or structural norms or organizations we create that resist either overt or covert attempts at self-organization" (Anderson, 2010, p. 28); "supports the learner's acquisition of skills and power such that he or she can articulate and achieve personal learning goals" (Anderson, 2010, p. 29) Pedagogy of nearness: blended learning -- "continual, uninterrupted process characterized by degrees of distance" (Anderson, 2010, pp. 32-33 as cited in Huelsmann, 2013) Epistemic engagement view: continued emphasis on constructivism (Larreamendy-Joerns & Leinhardt, 2006, as cited in Anderson, 2010)
Predominant technologies
Mobile technology, cloud computing, gaming, open content and personal learning environments (Horizon Report, 2012) "Shared virtual spaces and social media, single platform technology, and virtual worlds (e.g., simulated science labs), and new hardware such as smartphones, e-readers and tablets" (Huelsmann, 2013) Open educational resources (OERs) (Huelsmann, 2013) ( Clark, 2007. p3) Search-engine algorithms used for connectivist learning (Anderson, 2010, p. 31) Facebook, Twitter, Games, Blogging, YouTube, Skype, software and presentation tools (wordpressing tools-Word, spreadsheets)(Clark, 2013) Chat rooms, e-mail lists (Hase & Kenyon, 2000) Hase & Kenyon (2000): heutagogy Siemens & Downes (2005): connectivism Argyris & Schon: double-loop learning, in support of heutagogy Bernath & Vidal: Importance of theory Clark, 2011: More pegagogic change in 10 years than previous1000 years- all driven by 10 technology innovations Anderson (2010): comparison of established and innovative theories
Key authors