Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
A Close Encounter
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND:
1947 - Diploma in Nursing, New York Medical College 1951 - B.S. in Public Health Nursing, St. John's University, Brooklyn, New York 1954 - M.A. in mental health consultation, Columbia University, New York
1961 - The Dynamic Nurse-Patient Relationship: Function, Process and Principles 1967 - The Patients Predicament and Nursing Function an issue of Psychiatric Opinion 1972 - The Discipline and Teaching of Nursing Process : An Evaluative Study
Conducted Training Programs at McLean Hospital Managed 60 workshops about her theory in USA and Canada (1972-1981) Outstanding Nurse in the Hall of Fame of Massachusetts Nurses Association in 2001
METAPARADIGM OF NURSING
PERSON unique and developmental beings with needs, individuals have their own subjective perceptions and feelings that may not be observable directly NURSING providing direct assistance to individuals in whatever setting for the purpose of avoiding, relieving, diminishing, or curing the persons sense of helplessness HEALTH is not well-defined but assumed as freedom from mental or physical discomfort and feelings of adequacy and wellbeing
ORLANDO
ENVIRONMENT is not clearly defined as well but assumed as a nursing situation when there is a nurse-patient contact and that both nurse and patient perceive, think, feel, and act in the immediate situation
Development of Theory
In the late 1950s, Orlando developed her theory inductively through an empirical study of nursing practice. For 3 years, she recorded 2000 observations between a nurse and patient interactions. She was only able to categorize the records as "good" or "bad" nursing.
According to records: *Good Nursing nurses focus was on the patients immediate verbal and nonverbal behavior from the beginning through the end of the contact *Bad Nursing nurses focus was on a prescribed activity or something that had nothing to do with the patients behavior
From these observations, she formulated the Deliberative Nursing Process which was published in 1961. Conducted research at McLean Hospital through continuous tape recording of nurses with patients and other health care members Based on this research, her formulations were validated, thus she extended her theory to include the entire nursing practice system which then evolved as Nursing Process Discipline Orlando's theory remains one the of the most effective practice theories available. Many theory scholars utilized her concept as basis for their further studies. Her work has been translated into six languages and was contained in the international section. A web page about her theory, developed by Schmieding in 1999, is updated periodically and contains extensive references.
ASSUMPTIONS:
Assumptions about Nurses: The nurses reaction to each patient is unique Nurses should not add to the patients distress The nurses mind is the major tool for helping patients The nurses use of automatic responses prevents the responsibility of nursing from being fulfilled Nurses practice is improved through self-reflection
Assumptions about Patients: Patients needs for help are unique Patients have an initial ability to communicate their needs for help When patients cannot meet their own needs they become distressed The patients behaviour is meaningful Patients are able and willing to communicate verbally (and nonverbally when unable to communicate verbally)
ASSUMPTIONS:
Assumptions about the nursepatient situation: The nurse-patient situation is a dynamic whole The phenomenon of the nursepatient encounter represents a major source of nursing knowledge
Assumptions about Nursing: Nursing is a distinct profession separate from other disciplines Professional nursing has a distinct function and product (outcome) There is a difference between lay and professional nursing Nursing is aligned with medicine
FunctionProcess Presenting Immediate Nursing of Reaction Professional Discipline - Internal Nursing Investigation Response - Organizing Principle
PRESENTING BEHAVIOR PROBLEMATIC SITUATION To find out the immediate need for help the nurse must first recognize the situation as problematic The presenting behavior of the patient, regardless of the form in which it appears, may represent a plea for help The presenting behavior of the patient, the stimulus, causes an automatic internal response in the nurse, and the nurses behavior causes a response in the patient
IMMEDIATE REACTION INTERNAL RESPONSE Person perceives with any one of his five sense organs an object or objects The perceptions stimulate automatic thought Each thought stimulates an automatic feeling Then the person acts The first three items taken together are defined as the persons immediate reaction Reflects how the nurse experiences her or his participation in the nurse patient situation NURSING PROCESS DISCIPLINE - INVESTIGATION Any observation shared and explored with the patient is immediately useful in ascertaining and meeting his need or finding out that he is not in need at that time The nurse does not assume that any aspect of her reaction to the patient is correct, helpful or appropriate until she checks the validity of it in exploration with the patient The nurse initiates a process of exploration to ascertain how the patient is affected by what she says or does Automatic reactions are not effective because the nurses action is decided upon for reasons other than the meaning of the patients behavior or the patients immediate need for help When the nurse does not explore with the patient her reaction it seems reasonably certain that clear communication between them stops IMPROVEMENT - RESOLUTION It is not the nurses activity that is evaluated but rather its result : whether the activity serves to help the patient communicate her or his need for help and how it is met In each contact the nurse repeats a process of learning how to help the individual patient. Her own individuality and that of the patient requires that she go through this each time she is called upon to render service to those who need her
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
Distinguish the Theory Analyze the Theory
ANALYSIS / CRITIQUE:
CLARITY Presents concepts clearly and consistently uses the same words for her major components and processes.The writing style involves defining concepts minimally at first and then developing them throughout the book. SIMPLICITY Theory is considered simple yet elegant and has benefited research applications. It was also used as an example of grand nursing theory and described as a practice theory. GENERALITY Conceivably, the theory could be adapted to other nursing situation and other professional fields whose focus is on identifying and finding out patients immediate need for help. EMPIRICAL PRECISION Orlando used a qualitative method to obtain data from which she developed her theory. She also utilized field methodology before it became a world view in research. DERIVABLE CONSEQUENCES The nursing process discipline allows the nurses to view the patient from a medical disease orientation. The use of Orlandos theory benefits the patient, enhances the nurses professional identity, and helps to advance the nursing profession.
STRENGTHS
Limitations
Use of her theory assures that patient will be treated as individuals and that they will have active and constant input into their own care .
Nursing can pursue Orlando's work for retesting and further developing her work
Highly interactive nature Orlando's theory makes it hard to include the highly technical and physical care that nurses give in certain settings
Prevents inaccurate diagnosis or ineffective plans because the nurse has to constantly explore her reactions with the patient
Make evaluation a less time consuming and more deliberate function, the results of which would be documented in patients charts
Assertion of nursings independence as a profession and her belief that this independence must be based on a sound theoretical frame work
Her theory struggles with the authority derived from the function of profession and that of the employing institutions commitment to the public
Guides the nurse to evaluate her care in terms of objectively observable patient outcomes
CASE SCENARIO
Mr. So: Nurse, can you give me my morphine! Nurse: Can you tell how painful it is using the 0 10 pain scale, where 0 being not painful and 10 being severely painful? Mr .So: Ummm... I think its about 7. Can I have my morphine now? Nurse: Mrs. So, I think something is bothering you besides your pain. Am I correct? Mrs. So (crying): I cant help it. Im so worried about my 3 boys. Im not sure how they are or whos been taking care of them. Theyre still so young to be left alone. My husband is in Yemen right now and he wont be back until next month. Nurse: Why dont we make a phone call to your house so you could check out on your boys? Mrs. So called up his sons. After the phone call. Mrs. So: Thank you nurse. I dont think I still need that morphine. My boys are fine. Our neighbour, Mrs. Yee, shes watching over my boys right now.
5. Implement
6. Improvement
The nurse asks the patient whether the action helped and observes the patients verbal and nonverbal behavior. If he or she has improved, the need for help was mer. If not, the nurse continues to use the content of immediate reaction to explore with the patient until a positive change is evident.