Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
!"#$
&%')*( +
-,/."01
23
4 15&*6#$
,710*89 +:
;*Q<>CR=1=1E ? CF@ALT? BDSCFU7EHN)G? NDIF@V<>CR=LCJWY@A? KX"IFNJLE K6KIFMLZNDS[OP0CFN)E NJN)LL
\] @_^Z? ^JCRE` ] LZBAO_? IFLa;
KO_? <bC)OIF@K
cHdJedFfhtgDi igDk u)j k olk pgJqmJo0nf*dFndRv
dFnJdFow)p gDp oxJk jpq qJmRrbdFsd
yNJy0E CJ{0O|*IRz @AS?}ZIa~JF{>JNDz }FB)}RL1} ? BDI
*0>8# h#
8 +
+:#
8 /
1"!1
D Z6>*1) J:abRATT-1
HAT T
-T JH T:
A: 6
RR
"DJ 'JA
R 6 RHFA* A 6 D R 10 H 6 J0FJ
R JA R
A
R _T hF Z T T R Z F1 h F : H H 1 Z Z J1 F
R 1
1 T 1
1
h T*T
Z ) F * _ 1 R 0
- %X! - I 4 -=64 7
! Xd 4@ !@ 4B X !@
! - % I !
U X* < F
! -< 7-*6 -<
- : *@
G - -F4 !I - < -!- - < -
X! ! I = 6 < -= ! ! !
-B= - R ! % RF - 7 - 7 <7
7 : - X - < :-<-< B-: -
-< % U - - X I -G %- -7% ! 7 G
G! 6 %%- !- I - - -4 - I= -
- < - =46 G - = 7 4 I- - I - <
4 <
= dXI
X
< -* - e -BG -/! :-<
f
g hij k lm n k ioh p qm nMrst um jMv hnMp qmj g st mwsn sxm p m nhv"p qm4y>m k zut t8{ |} ~ Msil
v hn%p qm8wn hw*hn p k hi4hv'g m ij hn k io{ | ~| %8qmMn m j ut p j,sn m3rm n j k xk t sn)p hMp qhj m
n m w'hn p m l?k im g p k hi?st p qhuoqp qm ?sn mih p wn m j m ip m lk ip qk jwsw'm n 4Mp qm n
rst um j4v hn 8m n mst j h?uj m l>p h?g st g ut sp mp qm(j un rk rst"v n sg p k hi>m j p k xsp m j i
om im n st 'p qm4n m j ut p jsn m4j k xk t sn3p hp qhj mwn m j m ip m l?k i?m g p k hi/*zupv hnMrm n
j xst t%hnMrm n ?t sn om4j un rk rst)v n sg p k hijMsil?s(j xst t%j sxwt m4j k m 4 i/p qmt s p p m n
j k p usp k hi*)k pk jm w*m g p m lson m s p k ij p szk t k p /k ip qmxm p qhl/j k ig mk puj m jrm n
v m 0hzj m n rsp k hij8p hm j p k xs p m k i(p qmp sk t j8h v%p qm lk j p n k zup k hi*
i(om im n st k p3j m m xj"p qsp3p qmMk ip m n w'ht s p k hixm p qhl8hn j"3m t tp h4m j p k xs p m
j un rk rstv n sg p k hij %j,sMxsp p m n%hvv sg p,k p%3hn j,z*m p p m n)p qsi p qm3lk n m g p"xm p qhl*
p4j m m xjp qsp p qmM0k j z*m p p m np qsi?p qm4Np h/hzp sk i?j un rk rst%v n sg p k hi
m j p k xs p m j Mm j w*m g k st t BMqm iNuj k iop qm/k ip m n w*ht sp k hixm p qhl*OMh 8m rm n Mp qm
4/Nsil/p qmMNqs rm4lk )m n m ip z*m qs rk hun jMp h(m j p k xs p m4w'm n g m ip k t m jh v"p qm
j un rk rstlk j p n k zup k hi*%8qm34/k j%z*m p p m n)p qsi p qm3M?v hn%lm g n m sj k ioMv sk t un m
n sp m jMsilp qm Mk j8z*m p p m n3p qsi(p qm 4/Bv hn8k ig n m sj k iov sk t un mn sp m j
O>/ON//B
y>m,p qsi "n h v ,'n m lm n k g hM M3n u"v hn%xh p k rsp k io8uj%k ip qm"g hij p n ug p k hi
hv%p qm43g hlm
, ?8
Mst m i*484 { hiwsn sxm p n k g/k iv m n m ig m/v hn(sv sxk t Bhv g huip k io
wn hg m j j m jM* ' ***|
Milm n j m i*% 8hn osi*4 k t t 4sil m k lk io4'{ '
>3 ' 3 wn k iom n 3m n t som 03hn '
3hqhn k j *4' %{ 3hxwsn k j hih v%p qm g ux4ut sp k rm qs sn lsil/ swt si
/m k m nMm j p k xsp hn j8hv%p qm4j un rk rhn8v uig p k hi "" /M
'*** |
,t m xk io," "silBsn n k iop hi*",%M{ 3 ' /3 *
' *M* hqi(yNk t m 'Mm N3hn '
swt si*)8)")sil/m k m n %%"{ ~ Mhiwsn sxm p n k gm j p k xsp k hi/v n hxk i
g hxwt m p m3hzj m n rsp k hij' * 8 '3M( ' M
*'~
~
+
o
n
k
10
+
o
n
k
10
+
o
n
k
20
+
o
n
k
20
t=0.011
30
Sample size
t=0.127
30
Sample size
40
40
+
o
n
k
50
+
o
n
k
50
60
60
+
o
n
k
10
+
o
n
k
20
+
o
+
o
n
k
20
10
t=0.05
30
Sample size
t=0.261
30
Sample size
40
40
+
o
n
k
50
+
o
n
k
50
60
60
Figure 1: Survival fraction estimates at t for a Weibull distribution with =0.5, comparing NAE-direct method (+), KME-direct method (o),
NAE-interpolation method (n), KME-interpolation method (k) and the true value ().
0.62
0.84
0.82
0.80
0.78
0.60
0.64
0.58
0.92
0.91
0.90
0.89
0.88
0.74
0.72
0.70
0.68
+
o
n
k
10
+
o
n
k
10
+
o
n
k
20
+
o
n
k
20
t=0.105
30
Sample size
t=0.357
30
Sample size
40
40
+
o
n
k
50
+
o
n
k
50
60
60
+
o
n
k
10
10
+
o
n
k
20
+
o
n
k
20
t=0.223
30
Sample size
t=0.511
30
Sample size
40
40
+
o
n
k
50
+
o
n
k
50
60
60
Figure 2: Survival fraction estimates at t for a Weibull distribution with =1.0, comparing NAE-direct method (+), KME-direct method (o),
NAE-interpolation method (n), KME-interpolation method (k) and the true value ().
0.84
0.82
0.80
0.78
0.64
0.76
0.62
0.60
0.58
0.92
0.90
0.88
0.86
0.74
0.72
0.70
0.68
+
o
n
k
10
+
o
n
k
10
+
o
k
n
20
+
o
n
k
20
t=0.325
30
Sample size
t=0.597
30
Sample size
40
40
+
o
n
k
50
+
o
n
k
50
60
60
+
o
10
10
+
o
n
k
20
+
o
n
k
20
t=0.472
30
Sample size
t=0.715
30
Sample size
40
40
+
o
n
k
50
+
o
n
k
50
60
60
Figure 3: Survival fraction estimates at t for a Weibull distribution with =2.0, comparing NAE-direct method (+), KME-direct method (o),
NAE-interpolation method (n), KME-interpolation method (k) and the true value ().
0.84
0.82
0.80
0.78
0.64
0.76
0.62
0.60
0.58
0.92
0.90
0.88
0.86
0.74
0.72
0.70
0.68
0,009
0,007
0,005
T = 0,011
n=20
Sample size
n=50
n=50
0,018
0,015
0,012
0,009
0,006
0,003
0,023
0,018
0,013
0,008
0,003
n=10
n=10
T = 0,050
n=20
Sample size
T = 0,261
n=20
Sample size
n=50
n=50
e f
0,003
n=10
T = 0,127
n=20
Sample size
0,001
0,015
0,012
0,009
0,006
0,003
n=10
Figure 4: Mean Square Error for Weibull Survival with = 0.5, comparing KME-direct( ), NAE-direct(- - - -), KME-interp( )
0,009
0,007
0,005
0,003
0,001
t = 0.105
50
0,018
0,014
0,009
0,005
0,000
0,023
10
t = 0.223
20
Sample size
t = 0.511
20
Sample size
ih
50
50
ll
20
0,018
10
Sample size
0,020
0,028
0,016
0,013
10
t = 0.357
0,012
0,008
0,024
0,008
50
0,003
20
Sample size
0,004
10
Figure 5: Mean Square Error for Weibull Survival with = 1, comparing KME-direct( ), NAE-direct(- - - -), KME-interp( )
0,009
0,007
0,005
0,003
n=10
T = 0,325
n=20
Sample size
T = 0,597
n=20
Sample size
n=50
n=50
0,018
0,015
0,012
0,009
0,006
0,003
0,028
0,023
0,018
0,013
0,008
0,003
n=10
n=10
T = 0,472
n=20
Sample size
T = 0,715
n=20
Sample size
n=50
n=50
r s
0,001
0,026
0,022
0,018
0,014
0,010
0,006
0,002
n=10
Figure 6: Mean Square Error for Weibull Survival with = 2, comparing KME-direct( ), NAE-direct(- - - -), KME-interp( )
10
+
o
10
Sample
30 size
30
40
Percentile 50%
+
o
20
30
40
Percentile 30%
+
o
20
Sample
30 size
+
o
50
+
o
50
60
60
0.480
0.127
0.36
0.32
0.65
10
+
o
10
Sample
30 size
30
40
Percentile 40%
+
o
20
30
40
Percentile 20%
+
o
20
Sample
30 size
+
o
50
+
o
50
Figure 7: Percentile estimates for a Weibull distribution with =0.5, comparing NAE (+), KME (o), and the true value ().
60
60
0.261
0.049
t u
0.05
0.05
0.28
0.24
0.10
0.08
0.06
0.04
0.05
0.05
0.60
0.55
0.50
0.45
0.20
0.18
0.16
0.14
0.12
0.74
0
10
10
Sample
30 size
30
40
Percentile 50%
+
o
20
30
40
Percentile 30%
+
o
20
Sample
30 size
+
o
50
+
o
50
60
60
0.693
0.357
10
+
o
10
Sample
30 size
30
40
Percentile 40%
20
30
40
Percentile 20%
+
o
20
Sample
30 size
+
o
50
+
o
50
Figure 8: Percentile estimates for a Weibull distribution with =1.0, comparing NAE (+), KME (o), and the true value ().
60
60
0.511
0.223
v w
0.05
0.05
0.54
0.52
0.50
0.25
0.23
0.21
h1
0.05
0.72
0.70
0.68
0.39
0.37
0.35
10
o
10
Sample
30 size
30
40
Percentile 50%
+
o
20
30
40
Percentile 30%
+
o
20
+
o
50
+
o
50
60
60
0.833
0.597
10
10
Sample
30 size
30
40
Percentile 40%
+
o
20
30
40
Percentile 20%
+
o
20
Sample
30 size
+
o
50
+
o
50
60
60
0.715
0.472
x y
0.73
0.72
Figure 9: Percentile estimates for a Weibull distribution with =2.0, comparing NAE (+), KME (o), and the true value ().
Sample
30 size
0.05
0.05
0.71
0.70
0.69
0.480
0.470
0.460
0.450
0.05
0.05
0.84
0.82
0.80
0.610
0.600
0.590
0.580
0,28
0,24
0,20
0,16
0,12
0,08
Percentiles 50%
n = 20
Sample size
n = 50
0,11
0,09
0,07
0,05
0,03
0,01
0,037
0,007
0,010
0,013
0,016
0,029
n = 10
n = 10
Percentiles 40%
n = 20
Sample size
Percentiles 20%
n = 20
Sample size
n = 50
n = 50
{ |
0,04
n = 10
Percentiles 30%
0,021
0,004
0,045
0,013
n = 50
0,001
n = 20
Sample size
0,005
n = 10
Figure 10: Mean Square Error for Weibull Survival with = 0.5, comparing KME-interp( ) and NAE-interp(---X---)
0,10
0,08
0,06
0,04
0,02
0,00
n = 10
Percentiles 50%
n = 20
n = 50
0,06
0,05
0,04
0,03
0,02
0,01
0,00
n = 10
n = 10
Percentiles 40%
n = 20
Sample size
Percentiles 20%
n = 20
Sample size
n = 50
n = 50
~
S ample s ize
Percentiles 30%
0,030
0,000
0,005
0,010
0,015
0,025
0,05
n = 50
0,020
n = 20
0,04
n = 10
0,03
0,02
0,01
0,00
Sample size
Figure 11: Mean Square Error for Weibull Survival with = 1, comparing NAE-interp ( ) and KME-interp (---X---)
Percentiles 50%
0,024
0,030
0,024
0,018
0,030
0,018
0,012
n = 50
0,005
0,009
0,013
0,017
0,021
0,025
0,029
0,012
n = 20
Sample size
n = 50
0,006
n = 10
Percentiles 30%
n = 20
Sample size
n = 10
n = 10
Percentiles 40%
n = 20
Sample size
Percentiles 20%
n = 20
Sample size
n = 50
n = 50
0,006
0,030
0,025
0,020
0,015
0,010
0,005
n = 10
Figure 12: Mean Square Error for Weibull Survival with = 2, comparing KME-interp( ) and NAE-interp(---X---)