! "#
/

:<; ->=?@-BA

+-

-  -B*J?KE ML

EQ->*  RKS )

UT8TR

->N !

$&%

243


 

( ' )*,+-.)


576869

CD->E

; ?KN7)ONEPO

56869GF

 O- 

?@- R ? R

C GR@ ) R

(V? UWG! X

; 3

;ZY

-\[]?@-.) RKU )

^ ?_+-

; #



   


  ! #
"
#$!"% ' &)( ( *+,&

). 7 8:9;< =?>
- !
). / 01
23"%465 - !
& 9; 3/ 01
23"% @ >
- !
). 06%
7:A3?BC01
)D;E AFG( H8I6
1J 
KL ;8I$)M%7*N
K=?> O QPRL
STVUXW YZ


STVU ^ YZ
[]\

STVU ` YZ
[]\

ST $ YZ


[]\

ST / YZ


[]\

ST  YZ
[]\

M
[

bc"d0?BC01
)D%6 AFG( H8IE
1J 

e f!"g7f' K=?> O
 i

_ i

a i

$;i

di

/1i

*i

Ri

M%i

\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
( (
)( d
8 %j5k!8 bc"g04lBC02
)D%E ! $+b!8 U i
/48I6mQXH8I
U i /Q
) !
Efn& M
D)%6

MR&

76/ffoc/ p
/ 01
13"; 7  r
qDE M+& s] tuBR
#%fvxwy7*0; z (

{c
XH8I 5}| O =:> ~ 
VJ { 91J4 4
XH8I6 FA 8 7:A3?BC01
)D;E #

!
bc"d0?BC01
)D%6 AFG( H8IE 
m H8Ic
XH8I 8A
)D
 
6m2
1b
)D/

h#

Gauge fields
Isotriplet Wa (a = 1, 2, 3) and isosinglet B
W

Z
A

= (W1 iW2 )/ 2
=

cos W
sin W

sin W
cos W



W3
B

field strength tensors

a
W

= Wa Wa + g abc Wb Wc

= B B

Lagrangian
1
1 a
W ,a B B
LG = W
4
4

W
,Z

W+

W+


,Z

W+









,Z

Interaction with fermions

through covariant derivative
D = i g Ia Wa + i g 0

Y
B
2

for left and right-handed fermion fields

LD L +
RD R =

L L +
R R + interaction terms

g
23/2

(1 )
5

e
g= ,
s

f
e
2 s c

(vf af 5 )

s = sin W ,

c = cos W

af = I3f
vf = I3f 2 Qf s2




   "! # " ! $ &%' ( )*,+.-/
,01
+324+.5 ( )* 5*6%7(  8 9  +;:)-&4%<+=:2> ?4%A@BC6:
D G
E FIHHKJ  L9MONP FQJ 
R2S34%T6U 1@V5WX>5*>Y/WZ[+\:)-&4%]+^:)5
( )* 5*%_(  `a%A@( 2>@1
+;:/ 5V@ bc+X 6U
bc+3 R)2,5V@O%T@d`e5Wf gh5i:4%' j @h6lk

+
V(||,| 0| )

z{ | #
R2mX&%ngponqsr9tu@?Uv5wk x y
|} ~
be+3 16@5V:>5C+=k
q | ty xux
xusx T

u kh1@:)5[:/w@) *( ( v5% ?&%'mB+\:

2>0
+

| |

2
<0
0

| |

( +\:+\( ( @`e5Wf 1@5*:>5+^)5 'x y r r

v/ 2



 

   
 ! #" $
 %'&)(+*-,
.0/2143#3576 8 9;: < =?>28 9 : < =A@ B 8 < =
C D
E**  ' D *
F +!G
IH J
J,
< 6 KL

RS

NPO Q

BTBU< < V&W XY,

N Z
B
C [[ D
E*G* \ ' D *
]
^2_a`` N c
` b d e` f

Z N
B
] 8
=
O
^ a_ `g a_ `` N `cb d h `

i   D V'j ' k* mlonpq'* (r&) @ms &) tu#(tv 
&
w  D V' ' x* mlzy {}|~
Q ,j'& D ' 
IH *a
&q
%'&(Y|7npq'* r'+*j


  
   
  !"#
%$&
)
( '

)*

+ ,.- (0/1,

2 3

456
78
9

:    2 ;<
>
= ?$$& @A B
CD E
F! 2HG I
8
6%1J 

K
( '
( '

L M - (5N O

K
2 3

546
1
F

= ?$$ QR!"#
%$ 5HSTU 
5!&8    E
V  2 ;%

>
45WJ?F!X
7

Interactions of the Higgs boson

with fermions:

f
mf

H
f

with gauge bosons:

W = g)
( 2M
v

Z
Z

W+
















2 M2Z
v

2 M2W
v

W+

 

 

 


 

 



M 2Z
v2

 

 

 


 

 



H
 

 

 


 

 



M 2W
v2


  
       
! "$# 
% #'&)( +# *-,)#/.1023&425#60 97 8 :<;>=?:<;9@>:BA
Z2 "$# X [& 050 #+\* ,]#/.[0523&425# 0 8/>; =^;9@ _
`aa 8 : ec dd
a`a hjiMk h i^l jh iMm cedd `aa
aa
dd
aa
dd aa
=:
+h n k h n l /h n m
b @>: f g b jh opk h oql jh opm f b

CEDGFIHJ&+KL(M0ONP*RQS#TKUDVKWCYX
8 ec ddd
d h]sYtvu
=
@ f r

`aa 8 ec dd
aa
dd
=
b @ f w

s tvu _ H).E*R23&+Kyx Z2 Kz&).105D{CKLX &42|*\C.~}&)E*)TC/ZCYJ&Mx4&[0"E*

h Y
&[06(Z&M%& 7 A X &42MK*R

#[/"+&).E*06X _
H).E*R23&+K*R2Lx CD X &42MK* $. C &['CK/"+&).$,P*.j,
.$#/H[2ZKz&)TH)KLK#/.[22MKz&).[0^*R2*CY.[0 &[2M2 KW#[# #^j#/
@ =}44&JK# C~C6*.$NH$4#[N *.
"E*-,I" 0#T.[0^*R2**R29x
2C .$# % )"[x[0^*- 0 #6QS#4 20

hsY tvu h]sYtvu

J&+Ke&]X #^25#Tg K*[ #4N Mx )& .$,# 0
] "J&[0#

,~*Rj# 0 K *0# 2C    *\C-&42|*\C. *.

%#'&)( *.[2#TKe&j^2*CY. E*\CY\&425# 0  }  &).jN 


 


  
 !"#
$%&
'(% ) "%*
+ ,
- ,  .&0/21 

 43
5 $6#
'7 

' ,  8
H
9 :
;  =<*>$ ,
$ , 5 ?A@CBD6E"?@ F GIK
G J
+ L  , ,  .MN/O1 
'P
 743
L  , , RQTSE#"$ 
 U V
W QTSEE.X$ 
 U Y
+ Z[ \ X$ # &0/^]&_ ` 

 a3
Z[ \ X$ 
A.b c de[c f e[c g
c hic je[c ke[c lAemc ne[c o
p -
[;4QT =<*>$ , 
6q=< /^rsutv3 ?6wyx'e2?#xvzem?{wyzem|T}i~
q ,
6^QT
'
$%*% $ -6q>$  5 >$-%E% >$
% %=4\X$
$ -6q>$  
.{ c O.e[c me[c [
56X$QT =<E$ , 
{q=< ?4wyx em?4xv z em?4wz em|#}i~
1_ 

 
 Ey 

  M q , >$
{ X [ \X$ .M



 

  

 
 
 ! "$#%&"(')%+* % ,&-/1 .&0 % "32
98;:=<>!@?BA
, -/. 0
,-/.&05476
4
C D C E D ? D C F DHG 2
I
  

 JK L M)NPOQ=R+S TVU RWOXPQ=RZY [\]T_^[`=\VO
acbBdfehgfijkjlmgneoqp@r
acbBdfehgfijkjlmgtsuvd=wyx5z{g}|~ eo@qr
IWVK 
L B
 $  
(kPtP B
 $ JZ Jy
J

3
 K=  J  J K5
 
;5  D J
K3J
V 
?

? '5
'

B
 K
 JkPWJ y H{
(B

?

? ?


 JkPWJ= Ky=
=
J) $ H 

Electroweak precision tests

 


  
!"#"

$%#&

oweak precision physics

on measurements test quantum effects of the theory

cal: QED
Lamb shift:

e+

e
nucleus

g 2:

e
1 (g 2)
a=2

aexp = 1 159 652 188(4)1012

atheo = 1 159 652 157(28)1012

~
B


 

      

    "!$#&%(')$+*,.-0/21 .#&%
 3*4,$-0/21 $#&%(' 56787 9 7:7:;=<

?> 

     @  @ 
A 5BCEDF<G@ E, H$/I-J' 56:7 74K 9 >44<

LM3!EHN%O-QPR# 
5Z, ,.<

S 6S  TE @  UWVCXYS 6S  T
S S  T  % %[X% @ ]
 \  ^_^_^

a` PCbcd.# $-Qe.f +*,.-0/21 .#&%(' 5hg i:kjHlf3mnV o

'6jHN%p%Z.-0/2#eqmrV '6jH&%d%Z.-0/2#eqmH&%ZPR1 /sj ,EH-0/t%uf
!/vPR`wH&%[/vPR#xmy^_^_^z<
+*,x{y-Q"'3|4`}%('
~  "
y "
'O/2# k)p
~ 3
3
G "G

7.^k84; ^:>

>^v7:;:> ^:>4
^s>4N=8 ^:4k
8=^vn] ^:>
k4>^s >^7
E .^K4K456 <+C=

^4>x
^47
^x
^.
.^sx
^4


   



   !
"#
$
%
&')(! & *

+,  ,-
.0/21
6  !
7
8
 9.*:21
? @AB? CDA E F A 7
GHJI:KBL
354

; <, 
=)/>1
NPO QPO N5NPO Q R-RR

; * S
 ,-
.0/ T  UWV *V  *(<X1

NY'7
Z[
(
Z/ \

]
 T
.^'7[
8
'
_

sensitivity to internal particles (X)

Loop contributions
quantum corrections, of O(1%)


 
   

  

 
"! #%$&')(
1
.32

,
 4 655  7
8
"
9
1
*
*

.0/

.32

./
*
 5$:5<;=7
8
" 8 >?;@A
"$!BCDE5 
*
1
*
*
K
K
.2
./
FHGJI
  M
ON P
 
:DQO RS!  TDU V

 AV WW

 
X DY> :A <D7BZ %
# $&A[\]


 
   





&
#%$  '
'
)(+* , ( -/.10 !  . (+* , ()( 2
"

! 
+3 4


"

)6 # 
$ 7
5

#


3 4

9:; :<=?>A@B CD %E FGHIJD 

)KL M?ON  )KPE Q?R S  KTNEUWVSXYN  S BC[Z
8

\Z])KL ^_VM`BV C B  :> :>a D CS?R bcT/I

d CS?R bcTf gKB M?hW iES :jkPl/W iE VS V:EiAE; ^:)lN
e
f f:Em?Rf > ; J= i; COE  ngKB M?ON


  


 !#"$%&(')
+*,-/. 0 )21( 3,4* +*5 768
9 7&(': ;<=>0 
0 ?*,0 @&$AB. 0 $'<C',<DE8
F G (HI J'+KMLN0 4OK P?*, 4',
8QRMQ>4EST<U C' 2)(
C' (V
W Y3Z=[ \ ] Y3Z=[^ _ \ ` P?*, 4',
X
X
*'a&$Ab. 0 - ('OK'a' J0  ':7c>'5
8& !#"$@c>'
Y3Z=[ \ Y d [:e f g h i j ^ f \ h P?*, 4',
 4'$-k0 l2":@&('m
H!)C'5 G ; 5=I
5 V0 94n 4
, 7; . ',Hk0 l#"

55V0 7 n o (' 4p k0 

4
5 V0 94!#"$%&>'m
g
o
x!r svutq w
qrtsvutX w
qrtsvutw
;5 
4'$-k0 l2" (' 4/4k0

5 V0 94

5 V0 94



  


 !
#"
$&%'(
*) %+ ,-
$.)/0
 1 %+2 3
$43
$
)


 /5+
6  .)7
,/89 -:  !
#"
%'(
;)
6 
13
< ='/89>-:?, ..)1(% @
 AB&" A:?,'@C
13
4)
 
$D1  
$E= ,-
4F2<@G59 

HJI' , 8

.)3) #

 /89KML NOQP L NSR TUL N
VW.)*5% X .)3)Y,+8
A:Q,'Z9,'"[.\
B.
)]
,'Z+,@"[0D2 , \ ^F_U`+,  
$a
R
b NDc L N

R
d e b Nf

on-shell renormalization:

R g0g0g

c TUL N
m2 = Re (m2 )

e + e

charge renormalization:

e for q 2 = 0 (real photons) involves

virtual pairs


 
 + ++

e e , , , u
u, dd,
(g 2) and (MZ ), F. Jegerlehner, DESY Zeuthen

15

Effective finestructure constant (E)

virtual pairs

appears in many places in physics! large EWRC !

e+ e, + , + , u
u, dd,
Effective finestructure constant (E)
appears in many places in physics! large EWRC !

(MZ2 ) (0)

(MZ ) =
effective charge
1

 = lept + had ,
lept

= 0.031498

had

= 0.02758 0.00035

had

= MZ2 Re
3
,,

4m2

(3 loop)

Rhad(s0)
ds 0 0
)
2
s (s MZ i
0

s
Burkhardt, Pietrzyk 2005

4
Rhad
3

Bacci et al.
Cosme et al.
PLUTO
CESR, DORIS
MARK I
CRYSTAL BALL
MD-1 VEPP-4
VEPP-2M ND
DM2
BES 1999
BES 2001
CMD-2 2004
KLOE 2005

1
0.9% 15%

5.9%

6%

1.4%
rel. err. cont.

5
6
s in GeV

10

MW MZ correlation



  
   !#" $%&  '( )*+,
- .
0/
8 B7 CD :FE GH 8 57 KL M :FE N O P
I J7
8 57
N O>/RQ ST  UVW
-   . 
>V YX @Z
)\[
.]>)^'_Z
Z ` Z
%a bc
!"7 8 59
01 5 243 6 :(;<>=@? A

SM prediction:

GF

(1 + r)
=
2
2
2
MW 1 MW /MZ
2
r: quantum correction,

r = r(mt , MH , . . . )

complete at 1-loop and 2-loop order

MW = MW (, GF , MZ , mt , MH )

[Awramik, Czakon, Freitas, Weiglein]

80.5
80.45

exp
= (80.426 0.034) GeV
MW

MW [GeV]

80.4
80.35
SM prediction for MW

80.3
80.25

rag replacements

80.2
80.15

experimental lower bound on MH = 114.4 GeV

200

400

600

MH [GeV]

800

1000



 
 
   )&"*+&%,+ (




    !#"
$&%' ( 

-.0/21,354 176 8 179: <;7= >?  17@=BA @CD17@@E 
 
  F  GH
IJKL>NMO

 PQPRSKTMVU G>  W2SMX>Y
[Z M]\^ _F 
`  acdfb ehg
` o  p      o  p   
I


`


K
1
F
k
l
ij
m n b Y`rq m n b  bts ` b  o n  bKu m n b


v M]w>yx


o n  o      s o "  "   s o %  %  
z
~
 H{}K| N
s o  ( (  s c
o I = 
z O N{[| Oy ~
z JG{| KN ~

*- M 7  xP m n o n
P_  SG y>NM]^
o  p   o  p xwS
 

cross section [nb]

Z resonance

30

20

LEP:
ALEPH
DELPHI
L3
OPAL

3
4

data

10

86

88

90

92

94

cms energy [GeV]

Z-boson observables can be expressed in terms of

effective Z boson couplings:
gVf gVf + gVf ,

f
f
f
+ gA
gA
gA

f
with higher order contributions in gV,A

effective ew mixing angle (for f = e):



e
g
1
sin2 eff =
1 Re Ve
4
gA
complete at 1-loop order, 2-loop fermionic contributions

LEP Electroweak Working Group [Summer 2005]

Afb

0,l

0.23099 0.00053

Al(P)

0.23159 0.00041

Al(SLD)

0.23098 0.00026

0,b

0.23221 0.00029

0,c

0.23220 0.00081

Afb
Afb

had

0.2324 0.0012

Qfb

0.23153 0.00016

Average

mH [GeV]

10

10

/d.o.f.: 11.8 / 5
2

0.23

(5)
had= 0.02758 0.00035
mt= 172.7 2.9 GeV

0.232

2 lept
sin eff

0.234

LEP Electroweak Working Group

0.233

mt= 172.7 2.9 GeV

mH= 114...1000 GeV

2 lept
sin eff

mH

0.232

0.231

mt

68% CL

80

80.2

80.4

MW [GeV]

80.6

Global fit [M. Gr

unewald, EPS Lisbon 2005]

Preliminary
Measurement

Fit

(5)
had(mZ)

0.02758 0.00035 0.02768

mZ [GeV]

91.1875 0.0021

91.1874

Z [GeV]

2.4952 0.0023

2.4962

0
had

41.540 0.037

41.479

20.767 0.025

20.741

[nb]

Rl
0,l
Afb

Al(P)
Rb

|O
0

meas

fit

O |/
1
2

meas

0.01714 0.00095 0.01645

0.1465 0.0032

0.1481

0.21629 0.00066 0.21573

Rc

0.1721 0.0030

0.1723

0,b
Afb
0,c
Afb

0.0992 0.0016

0.1038

0.0707 0.0035

0.0742

Ab

0.923 0.020

0.935

Ac

0.670 0.027

0.668

Al(SLD)

0.1513 0.0021

0.1481

2 lept
sin eff (Qfb)

0.2324 0.0012

0.2314

mW [GeV]

80.425 0.034

80.383

W [GeV]

2.133 0.069

2.092

mt [GeV]

174.3 3.4

175.1

Bounds on mt and MH

High Q except mt
68% CL

mt [GeV]

200

180
mt (Tevatron)

160

Excluded
10

10

MH [GeV]

10

6
5

Theory uncertainty
Mtop
Run-I average
Run-I/II prel.

4
3
2
1
0

Excluded
30

100

500

MH [GeV]

MH < 186 GeV

(95%C.L.)

renormalized probability for MH > 114 GeV to 100%:

MH < 219 GeV

(95%C.L.)


  
 
 


!





 

"$#&%




')(+*-,/.10 243$56
7 8:98;=< 243?>@>BA?
C,D5@5B5B7
<E GF HI


J  
K E

BLMLNPO <


8PEN<48 R 8?P<SBK8R 
8 ; G
 H T 
U T  V W 5 X :
8 Y Z U T 

[ T 
V

5]\^5@_a`

R 8?P<SBK8R 8; GHIbc BLN8d
=eaBEef8d
gf<4 ;@BLh e<

 iBLjG<k<=
l<i8Pmn
U o   [ o  
p 3?`
bqrBLN8d
=eaBEef8d
gf<4 ;B@L^rEeG<
p s `

anomalous gauge couplings

generalization of gauge boson self couplings
(F = A A,
LW W /Z

analogously)
Z , W


= e (W+ W+) W A

+ W+ W F

+
+ 2 W
W F + h. c.]
MW

+e cot W (W+ W+ ) W Z

+Z W+ W Z

Z
+
+ 2 W
W Z + h. c.
MW
Standard Model:
= Z = 1,

= Z = 0


 

  
' $

#%$
(*)
'

#&

 
 !" 

#%$

&

' $

+!,.'

#&

&

WW (pb)

/02130546487

30

16/07/2002

LEP
PRELIMINARY

20

10
YFSWW/RacoonWW
no ZWW vertex (Gentle)
only e exchange (Gentle)

160

180

200

s (GeV)
3 9:<;=3> ? @AB C
D=;FEGHI 9 ==EJ BK
LEMCN=3 F@OKPIKI  ?NQJI9

0.2

LEP Electroweak Working Group

1.25
1.2

0.15

1.15
0.1
1.1
0.05

1.05

-0.05

0.95
0.9

-0.1
0.85
-0.15
-0.2

0.8
0.9

0.75

1.1

0.9

0.95

g1Z
1.2

1.05

1.1

g1Z

LEP Preliminary

1.15
1.1

95% c.l.

1.05

68% c.l.
2d fit result

1
0.95
0.9
0.85
0.8

-0.1
LEP charged TGC Combination 2003

0.1



    "!#$%'&$() * %+ -, /. *,0%+&12&43657&81
 91
: / ;1=<;& >@?)A4BC D1: /E(F143G1:&H14 -%4 I
 *
HJLK38MON >QPRFS MON >UTRL VPR >UTRW -( 121: *C%'&$?),X
X.  ,X 
X3
X F
X%/A12 *Y<H
1
Z[%+
&3:3/\$1
 H]01
 FA+C^_& *,
. ,X `57& a b%4c( 1a
X3d
Xe1
 Z%' *12
Y&5f1
 " +
XGd "%'&12&+3g
X %/,X  [1
 "%'&$12+
h)1

&i5j
&Bk32l3m12 *BVI14
X%
  %' /:14
X1

 *3/

Anomalous g-factor of the muon

Dirac theory:

g=2

QED, 1-loop order:

g =2+

Standard Model prediction

QED part: 4-loop (5-loop estimate)
Electroweak part: 2-loop

Experiment 2004: Brookhaven E821

g2
a =
= 11659208(6) 1010
2
above the SM prediction

e Saga of the anomalous magnetic moment of the m

a (g 2) /2

Theoryexperimental
versus experiment
ew about the current
and SM (theory) result

a 10

10

- 11659000

laboration, hep-ex/0401008]
230
220

Avg.

210

[ ]

200
+

[e e -]

190
180
170
160

Experiment

Theory

150

theo,SM
10

(25.2

9.2)

10
+

e e data based prediction:

long his

2.7 below exp. value

meyer, Theory seminar, university of Edinburgh, 01.10.2004

data based prediction:

0.7 below exp. value
uncertainty mainly from hadronic vacuum polarization

Summary of precision tests

 
 
   !"
# $ %& '(')*'+ , -/.0.1 324"5 * 67 8
9
# ,3, /& ':,;" <67=> 1 @?;
A,
B*C5  .0  0
B1 " ,;
9
DE
' F ,3,5 *67 $G
# HFI/ JK!II; 
36L%
M
?ONP Q SR VT UU W 3X

36L%
; 6YZ
[H!I\ J7FII;   ;  0
],36^ 
*6_`a;
b)`3 ?")<cdeI ` f *g h 6ij
1 $G

?k! dF/
D
*3* l 6YZ
["m I;;
n(F/ <6o/pHF?%
9q
E
C1 0
*)? ;.
B" *6r
'" `a;
])0`3
P s N  etvuxw5y N z { NE||| ?
C. 0
B1  :%
9 z }~NE|||
# JK!I\ a%"d') ,3,*6; 
 =>AZ
9

(expected) experimental precision

error for

LEP/Tev

Tev/LHC

LC

GigaZ

33

15

15

0.00017

0.00021

4.3

0.2

0.13

0.1

0.05

0.05

MW [MeV]

sin2 eff

mtop [GeV]

MHiggs [GeV]

together with
MZ = 2.1 MeV
GF/GF = 1 105

(LEP)
( lifetime)

0.000013

[Erler, Heinemeyer, Hollik, Weiglein, Zerwas]

0.23250
SM@GigaZ

pr

es

en

68% CL:

tly

0.23225

LEP/SLC/Tevatron
LHC/LC
GigaZ

sin eff

0.23200

MH =

mt

180 GeV

0.23175

150 GeV
120 GeV

0.23150

0.23125
80.25

80.30

80.35

80.40

MW [GeV]

80.45

80.50

Higgs bosons
Higgs boson is the only missing ingredient of the SM

 
 
 !"#%$'&(
)$+*-,.(
/ +0&
1$234 $1*5$637389
"::;
< =2>>>@?
X =2>>'YZ?

CA BEDF?
GIH%GKJ $637389
MLONQPOR TS 2= >U V
;W
[
\,K]$'&^L`_Fa& bcb ?
dOd e f$'3g389
ML'NQPOR h = [ 
W

Ti =2>>+jk?

A
l ?
d;d f$'3g389
ML'NQPOR h Y;m [
W

iT =2>'Y=k? n

A l ?
GIH%GKJ $637389
MLONQPOR h o >> p`Y >>> V
;W



   
  
  !#""$ % & ' (
) +* !,-./ 01324!#3 0156
/$7$89;: 9=< > ? @
9<
?
?

9:

) +* !,-./ A
BDC 0E%
F$7$8+@ > GIH G

G
@

exclusion limit (95% C.L.):

MH > 114.4 GeV

HG

Theoretical bounds on Higgs boson mass from

perturbativity
upper bound
unitarity
upper bound
triviality (Landau pole)
upper bound
vacuum stability
lower bound

perturbativity
Higgs decay widths into fermions:
(H f f) = tree Kf
Kf = 1 + (1 loop) + (2 loop) +
Higgs decay widths into vector bosons:
) = tree KV
(H V V
KV = 1 + (1 loop) + (2 loop) +

[Ghinculov; Frinck, Kniehl, Riesselmann]

(1-loop) = (2-loop) for MH = 930 GeV

unitarity

 


 "!

#$%
'&(

) ./) . 0

*+(-,

) ./) .

)
1

46587
)

46587

IJ$%KL

:<;= >
? @=

=
9

A BDC-E

M#N
O**PQRS!

F/

>

$(
TIKJ$


 
  
 
  !"#$ % &(')
* + ,

/
.
-

, 20 31 3 4 5 1 / 9 :;<
6 87

=
>?5 @ A

, * B / * +
*

D'EF  G HJI "LK MI %NOIQPR'&L'ESNET M '&IUM 

VW 2X 'EY
V
03 3 4 , 0 6 8
2 ,
for s >> MW

2
MH
M 2
v

with t = 2s (1 cos ),
2
2
MH
MH
+
2+
2
2
s MH
t MH

partial wave expansion:

M(s, t) = 8

(2l + 1) Pl (cos ) al

l=0

unitarity condition:
|al | < 1

project on l = 0 partial wave:

Z 1
1
a0 =
d cos M(s, t)
16 1



2
2
2
MH
MH
MH
s

=
2+
log 1 + 2
2
8v 2
s MH
s
MH

2
MH
4v 2

a0 < 1

for

2
s >> MH

MH < 872 GeV

triviality (Landau pole)

Higgs self coupling is scale dependent, (Q)

variation with scale Q described by RGE

d
3 2
=
,
dt
4 2

Q2
t = log 2
v

solution:
(Q) =

(v)
1

Q2
3
(v)
log
4 2
v2

with

2
MH
(v) =
2v 2

diverges at scale Q = C (Landau pole)

 2 2
4 v
C = v exp
2
3MH
maximum Higgs mass by condition C > MH

MH < 800 GeV

vacuum stability
top-quark Yukawa coupling

2mt
gt =
v
contributes to the running Higgs self coupling (Q) through
top loop

gt4

variation with scale Q described by RGE



4
d
m
3
t
2

dt
4 2
v4
approximate solution:
3m4t
Q
(Q) = (v)
log
2 2v 4
v
(Q) < 0 for Q > C vacuum not stable
high value of C needs MH large enough
C 1016 : MH > 130 GeV
C 103 :

MH > 70 GeV

combined effects, RGE in two-loop order:

d
1
2
2
2
12 3 gt + 6 gt +
=
dt
16 2

[Hambye, Riesselmann]






"#%$&')(*,+-.0/

&&23"#4+56#7689:#:#<;$,+=>,?@

2A$BCDE$&.
J

!

 


F$& GH2

IH23",,+5

D;KLNMO;F$4+=GPRQSMT>,UF$,+5:KDSMWV*XYMOZZZ\[

>

&;I?]L':K!

C4?a7b>DT&;I?]L':#

S.I

;+-S>f

>DT&;I?]\:

>

;+5h.YF>iG@

.&>d$iQ

L>,?m

7^4+_2%@

E`

:I$&':K

"4KBT'

89:#:#<;,4),de$&?

.Ig)4+_2%\$ 

,7

')B$& 

+k$ )D`

>4+5#fjC>g@T'

"+k$&>,UlL':

3,7!Ul:

+k$ G@#

U,+on_I+-.&4+pDqrS>i

2A$B

D[

$&F.

total width and branching ratios





 




&%
'% &
&% &

$

!
 

$#

"



!
 

K ;-;







LNL

KLLL

010
//
,., -

L'SK :932 29
8+8 -

<>=@?AB

L&S L&K
+) )
L&S LNL&K 676 454
(*)
L&S LLNL&K KLL

P
K L

KRNL

LL

P
C@DFEGLL H.IJ

LL

   





 "!#$ %&')(*,+

-.1214365


143
V

7 8:9
WYX

Z %&')(*,+
[\[

143D5

7 8:9

[q[ /

7 8:9

?P= A( = Sz(* % ? {

1s3D5

LNM

7 8:9

143D5

LNM

V
0
X
0

;utv? CB(G CwS = yxbJ

k C ="| _ } =@?~ '"+

-.-s[q[ /

143D5

[,][,]

e ? ,lmCK'Q'nCK'"+
[o[p]/

1214365

;^ (*`_ Ea5 bC @

= ? ( Edc C@efeIC@g%hC@bAIJ

< (*II'U!#'iS ?j=fk fg



;<>=@?  = B
 ADC ?&E F G( HI ? CKJ
;9 CO ?P= 'Q')( E R = T SU6(HJ

LNM
V

mq 0

WY q 0

;ut
C C@ =D~`~ C ? w
C S = yx E9= '  CwS = xJ
;9 C@DBC ? CwS = y xbJ

Higgs production at the LHC

INJMJ

/10324265

*


8:9,;=<?>A@4B
,-

# .

"!$#"%&')(



IKJ

 


 


I

JPOQI

INJMJ

CEDGF H

IKJLJMJ

The Profile of the Higgs Boson

Production Processes

500 fb


 

 

 
 


500 GeV

800 GeV

= 120

74000

35000

27000

= 160

52000

29000

24000

= 250

5500

16500

19000

 

K. Desch

1000 fb

350 GeV

500 GeV

800 GeV

= 120

15500

37500

158000

= 160

7500

25000

126000

= 250

6500

8000

71000

500 fb

1000 fb

350 GeV

500 GeV

800 GeV

= 120

90

2600

= 160

1500

= 250

390

500 fb


 

 


500 fb

500 fb


 


1000 fb

350 GeV

500 fb



500 fb

500 fb

1000 fb

350 GeV

500 GeV

800 GeV

= 120

80

160

= 160

20

120

= 250

30

Higgs Boson Precision Studies at a Linear Electron Positron Collider , Fermilab, 03/05/2001

Page 10

Higgs production at a Linear Collider

D ?A?

  



D?


 

 " !$#% !'&)( *,+. -/103254

D  
?HG D D ?A?


DFB ? DFE ? C ?A? ;<= B ?A?
6 7:9
8

>@?A?


 
 
   !"#
$!% &'(

)*
,+
- . 0/
*%  #
1 2
) 345% 6
7 58)9 :66
;<% #
=
3>0?*?!
@0?)+ A
7
B CEDGFH
- !#
)!% ?#
I
J?$
K(L 
 =
M
- . 0E<
J?$
0 .
?)
)
N6
I% ."*
OPL  Q R S 0/
*
- ?*L*
)
@T<#
= L
) UVW//YXZT6L %  [
\ MP/#
UVW//] TL
-
)
;.:$X^/!/ T 6L _Q`X<#
N
@0?)
K(L =
Mab
*
:T
cX^?#6#
dfe 6
]
+b)
E<
J?$
)g+
Nb=
N
U P// 66
- f9=
N0?# Q h
- UhP//^XZ66  _Q`X.b
N6
i"?$
K(L \
- k !l$K1  <#
N
@0?)
K(L
\ Q>!#
)!
 )9 :66
;<% #
=

UhP// :6]
N#
Kj

Open questions of the Standard Model

  
      !"
#$%'&()'

"
*+ ',
- .&/0
01'2"
( 34  , 576 8:9<; = 576 8?>3; = 6 8A@4;
B CD D EFHG7
I 0J  &,)K"
4
01'2"
( &(D  L,#
I%NMOI%PQ

01'2"

JE
  ( 1R P,

OST%P,
U
01'2"
( UV #T+

01'2"
( XWY,
UZW XW "

H[4-
"
J&()\./P,
( ,S[C:W 8^]

_*"
4 DO.01PI`;





 


&




'
(

*,+

@BADCFE

KBLNMPORQ >

T 6 L ;=0?>
Y ;>Z;=0:>

WFX

/ TT >

6 / T as9 7 >t9u*2%*54

}B~:~5~
b3v|

=s5~s

*23*54

H
H

U
[ A]\^A]_
jkAl

APm

- MPO 9v/p` 6r7

> 687 -:9<;=0?>

@B
I A

> KBLNMPORQ >

SI

T 6 L /10?;>

UI

`ba MPOcT /10:;>

I e
df

0 7 L 9 OM 6 /10:;>

Ghg H
H

dI n
k

Ghg H gpogrq
H

J
e

>t9 M Yw687

x *y

*.-/10

V
Al

#$%

*.-/10

687 -:9<;=0?>

!"

I n
d

C5
I E
J

]

=:}c.

.~:

]

G
H

}~

5<]b}c.

G
G

SUSY Higgs sector

SM Higgs:
4 term ad hoc
Higgs boson mass: free parameter
no a-priori reason for a light Higgs boson
SM (perturbatively) unstable at some high energy
SUSY Standard Model avoids these questions
minimal model: MSSM




H2+
v1 + H10
H2 =
,
H1 =
H1
v2 + H20
couples to u

couples to d
H 4 terms

SUSY gauge interaction

self coupling remains weak
physical Higgs bosons:

h 0 , H 0 , A0 , H

2 vacuum expectation values:

v2
v1

= tan

Spectrum of Higgs bosons in the MSSM

(example)
500
max

MHiggs [GeV]

450

mh

scen., tan = 5

400

h
H
A

350

+-

300
250
200
150
100
FeynHiggs2.0

50
50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

MA [GeV]

large MA: h0 like SM Higgs boson

m0
h strongly influenced by quantum effects


 
 

135

mh

exp

mt = 175 GeV, tan = 5

mh [GeV]

130

125

theory prediction for mh

exp
mt = 2.0 GeV
exp
mt = 1.0 GeV
exp
mt = 0.1 GeV

120

115
150

200

250

300

350

MA [GeV]

400

450

500


 
 

   "!$# %! &('*) +,$-- .0/-1/"
2 354 +6&- .-/-7/"-8
2 3:9;3=< !>$"'?) +,$-- .0/-1/"08
@AB)C' D EGF EHD I ' #J?K*L MONP#RQS/(TPU=!%V  1QR#WXWYZ$/[
\ ] D ^`_
  !%$"'?) +6$--a.-/-7/" b cd/PYe# MfD EgF E1D I [
2 3:9;3=< +,$--h8
2 i/"*j 3k9l3P< m jn+6&-ojhp/"TP.=!$#)acd/qNP#X!r8
   "!$# ' #J?K*L +6&- .-/-7/" Mos t0u-u v#wx[
2 3:9;3=< YOTP!&#RN /"T?)
z)nYe/"i *)z#WY{|Q)n&/(08
2 354 b My8i[
  / +,$- .0/7/"
2 })CY~/" "!BL *)z#WY{|Q)ni @ #J  *)z#WY{|Q)n&/(
|#@ z)nYe/"  /PYeQR# ] # w 1JQ P!&#










"!$#&%('*)+",.-0/132546#87





"!$#C@O'*4P"!QN

SM:
MSSM:
CMSSM:





9:#<;



+
= ->,?#A@CB"DEF2GBIHJ"!K'L/MDN

2/d.o.f = 27.2/16
2
/d.o.f = 16.4/12
2/d.o.f = 23.2/16

LEP: MZ
Z
had
Rl
l

FB

Rb
Rc
b

FB
c

FB

Mt
sin2

lept
eff

MW(LEP)
SLC: sin2

lept
eff

(ALR)

b Xs
aSUSY

pulls=(data-theo)/error

special: MW and a = (g 2)/2 for muon

[Chankowski, Dabelstein, WH, M

osle, Pokorski, Rosiek]
[update: Heinemeyer, Weiglein]

80.70

experimental errors 68% CL:

LEP2/Tevatron (today)

USY

Tevatron/LHC

MW [GeV]

80.60

tS
ligh

ILC/GigaZ

MSSM
80.50

SY

y SU

heav

80.40
V

3 Ge

80.30

11
MH =

SM
80.20

MH =

400

SM
MSSM
both models

GeV

Heinemeyer, Weiglein 05

160

165

170

175

mt [GeV]

180

185

190

g2

Feynman diagrams for MSSM 1L corrections:

0
j

Diagrams with chargino/sneutrino exchange

Diagrams with neutralino/smuon exchange

Enhancement factor as compared to SM:

: m tan
i

0
a : m tan
j

S. Heinemeyer, Theory seminar, university of Edinburgh, 01.10.2004

m2

SM, EW 1L:
M2
W

m2

MSSM, 1L:
tan
M2
SUSY

17



 

   


!#"$%&(')*+',"-/.0"12%

&% 34%657%&89";:&=<>18/?!:!57%&8+"@:!3
A
%&3B?'

D% CE% .0"F'GIH5 8%0J

',"NIH
8R KL89"@%&2:/.0"NK4H
8

KL89"@%&M:.0"NK4H
8'72%657:1KL8>JO%P:!Q
STM:18? UO81KVA
%P?
W $% H1XKB% '

8 %0J ',"YH8ZR[?\<18&:!5]KB.^'
:9"7$1K4R
$`%&8/%&#<a'b.P:134%

8 %0J ',<!5_57%0"N=<
'0!cd%&Y',<!5_57%0"#<