Sie sind auf Seite 1von 5

Upper Secondary Art Review 2008 O / N(A) / Both *

Feedback on Upper Secondary Art Curriculum * Please delete where applicable.

Name of School:____________________ Name of Teacher: __________________

CPDD is currently doing a Mid-Term Review of the Upper Secondary ‘O’ and ‘N(A)’
Levels Art Syllabuses. We hope you can take some time to fill in this questionnaire in
order for us to understand your needs and thoughts about possible improvements for
the syllabuses. We also hope that you can return the completed forms via fax (6778
4352) within one week of receiving this form. Thank you.

A. Syllabus Document
1. What do you think are the strengths of the revised syllabus and why?
Studio Practice

Study of Visual Arts

Assessment

2. How can the syllabus be improved?


Studio Practice

Study of Visual Arts

1
Upper Secondary Art Review 2008

Assessment

B. Curriculum Time and Deployment


3. How much curriculum time is allocated to the following per class, per week in
your school?

Upper Secondary Art periods min/period


Lower Secondary Art periods min/period

4. Please provide details for the following:


Name of Art Teacher Status (Permanent / Adjunct Levels / Stream (No. of
/ Contract / Relief / Service classes)
Provider)
Eg. Ms Rosemary Kok Permanent Sec 2 Exp (2);
Sec 2 NA (3);
Sec 3 NT (1)

2
Upper Secondary Art Review 2008

C. Implementation
5. How is Studio Practice implemented in your school?
Aspects Description (Please give some details)
Curriculum Time

Mode of Delivery

Mode of Assessment

What has been covered

3
Upper Secondary Art Review 2008

6. How is the Study of Visual Arts (SOVA) implemented in your school?


Aspects Description (Please give some details)
Curriculum Time

Mode of Delivery

Mode of Assessment

What has been covered

4
Upper Secondary Art Review 2008

Other Comments

Thank you for your feedback.


CPDD Art Unit

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen