Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
JOURNAL
VOLUME 1, NUMBER
OF
5
CLINICAL
NUTRiTION
JULY-AUGUST, 1953
Treatment Calorically
of OBESITY
with
UNRESTRICTED
By
DIETS
MI).
I
there that
A. \V.
PENN1NTON,
IS
well a level
that that
icintake ex-
SeIVC
stoles.
diet
ate
cornes)on(lingly
sina
11cr of
quires to
intake The
of food. strategic
advantage
of
such
a plan
penditure. by conscious it
This
limitation restraint
of
is usually effected the appetite hut for by brought it so that for individuals, by regulatory are disturbed operate seems at the It reasonbelieving physioto bear weight enforcing the
beell pointed out by Dole et (:1.2 however, to be an even greater this method of treatment, in restriction of the whole for, when carbohydrate, there is no decline in the expenditure.1 When, however,
intake is restricted, a
forces which, being the appetite, regulate without restriction. the In necessity normal
to general pattern;
restricted, caloric
the
total
decline
in basal
BASAL
expenditure
EXPENDITURE
is to
OF
DIETS
be expected.
THE OIwsE
of body to
Low
CALORIE
able, therefore, the disturbance intact mechanisms intake to output Evidence has bolic ruvic cessive tween tion treatment composed, striction removing alleviates stance that more
From and Co.,
expect that, if the cause of can be removed, these stillshould adjust the caloric at a normal weight level.1 been presented for a metapathway of by inducing the output; been balance and suggested pyexberest ncas diet Reby acid, subresult a
This
sOfl and!
been who
Rynearwork of
Erown and Ohlson4 and of Strang and Evans as showing a (leerease in basal caloric expenditure of the obese on low calorie diets, and to the Muhier such
on
in as
of
Evans Ronys
and and
Topper,8
storage,
conclusions
of Evans of the
of carbohydrate
of
Keeton
observes
in a calorically unrestricted essentially, of protein and fat. of carbohydrate, much of the the on the inhibiting oxidation it source of fat, is believed, of pyruvic of this with the
h)CFSOUS
influence
insufficient
the energy needs of the tissues, being fully supplied from the bodys own reMedical Wilmington, Division, Del. :343 E. I. du Pont (IP Nemours
formation Ohlsons
definite showed
studies4
among
344
THE
JOURNAL
OF
CLINICAL
NUTRITION
[Vol.
1,
No.
five
which
SI(NIFICANCE
OF THE
ENERGY
DECLINE
IN BASAL
EXPENDITURE
the
decline
in
either
the
was lost
found weight
that after
obese treatment
individuals, by low
who calorie
face latter
decline occurs, stems from their introduction of a special formula for calculating metabolic rates from the ideal, rather than from the actual sumption weight-a that fatty method tissue based is on the asmetabolically should not calcula-
maintained considerably
a constant lower
weight on a food than that of other the This two obese intake of
difference
which person
would imist
require subsist
that on
the
formerly
inert and that, therefore, its weight be taken into account when metabolic
a subcalorie
tions are made. The discovery that fatty tissue is metabolically active, however, seems to rule out the validity of metabolic calculations
metabolism
food the rest of his life if he chooses to control his weight by this means. Continuance of suhealoric in fact, diets become after weight reduction recommendation.3 has, a standard
based
on
ideal
weights,
of the
calculation
and its decline on low calorie tageous.3 Examination of the basic data reported no decline in metabolism actually, considered by Moller7 there was significant. showed a decline The a decline
diets
advanwho that,
of those reveals
to a caloric intake below their requirement. In both there would seem to have occurred what Lusk referred to as a specific reduction in metabolism question with it is true, coincident of the greatest use as of low is with undernutriin diets believed, is ion. 12 The connection whether
which was not one case studied of 12.5 per cent of (calculated a decline
only 3.8 per cent in the B.M.R. of 25 children, but pointed out that the pelidisi of Pirquet* is a better standard in this age group than the usual surface area rule. Calculations from the graphs of the eight eases studied Keeton and Bone#{176}show that. there was average decline of 12.2 per They did not consider this the rates did not fall of normal, customarily clinical tests of the however, such note that in below cent. in the significant B.M.R. because
that the reserve stores in an amount sufficient needs of the organism. that
that
of fat are drawn upon to meet the metabolic It might be reasoned rate
tissues
is by an
a fall
the
in basal
requirement
metabolic
of the
means
for
only
energy
has declined, are fulfilled tion, however, mal that less metabolic a decline than
and that their metabolic needs in any case. Another interpretacould be that there is an optirate below for each individual, this rate indicates amount of energy and that is being
the arbitrary limit used in interpreting metabolism. It seems, experiments to take significant inevithere on the
an optimal
physiological
as this it is more appropriate of the actual changes in the The basic seem to that, fall of lQw in in the metabolic calorie
to centimeters a normal
made available for the metabolic work of the tissues. This interpretation would be in accord with Benedicts view that the basal metabolism is a very good index of the general basal of state caloric tests diagnosis gland or level of vital would at the activities.3 to he an level. basal value of diseases very the well range metabexcept be that of error in of the cellular The index As metabolism nutrition interpreted, are rarely and
;14
obese diets.
According in of
Pirquet, is person.
the
cube
of
the
sitting in
height grams
approximately
the
weight
thyroid in ordinary
clinical
July-August
1953]
A.W.
PENNINGTON
345
is
too
wide
for
uses
require
greater
should nutrient
be possible
material
for
to
the the
answer diets
to merely
the
the low
in metabolic
of the
capable. There of a shortage of metabolic in metabolic is the is treated in which it seems, work rate
a lessened
of the situation
tissues, be pro-
the tissues, or, on the other hand, it signifies that the tissue requirements being inquiry matters the the fulfilled, would seem to necessifundaMetato into some of the most in metabolic theory. in its question: amount broadest scope,
theory,
attempts
co#{241}sisting essentially
Ketogenesis,
what causes the body to of nutrient materials that on the Rubners matter concept
has
the
tities zation
normal
than
mechanism
to utilize fat
by
in
which
much
is enabled furthermore,
of
it
is
otherwise
followed acids the fatty tissues from
could.8
by the increased adipose
Ketonemia,
mobihitissues.9
a rigidly fixed caloric expenditure, determined by the requirement; this in turn is determined by the surface area of the body. This cofleel)t was opposed vigorously by Rubners teacher, Voit, who insisted that, while the tissues have a certain foodstuffs, maximal capacity the am o u ut they for metabolizing actually me tahothe qualto them cause of
blood
acids to
concentration
becomes oxidize would
of both
increased,
them
seem and
in
to
larger
be the
amounts.61
Ketogenesis, therefore,
lize is influenced by the quantity and ity of the nutrient materials brought by Voit the blood.2 said, cannot The requirement possibly be the
to
possibility
unrestricted
of weight
diets;
reduction
on
calorically
for energy.
applicability
to
metabolism any more for gold will put it into concept of the metabolism support zation by the in studies of glucose,15 tissues which fatty
than the requirement ones pocket. Voits would seem to find show acids,16 by in that and the the utiliketonesT concentia-
ketogenic response to fat feeding is than it is in the lean.2#{176} A greater than quota of upon the the energy tissues requirements by fat to the indeposits, a correin which into the adjusturged
ordinary would be
of the bodys would decline Animal are indicate experiments introduced a very
is influenced
extent.
materials
tions of these substances decline in metabolism weight reduction by low might reserve bilized needs reasonably stores of
the blood. The of the obese during calorie diets, therefore. the mo-
drinking
water
precise
be taken to indicate that body fat are not being to meet the metabolic
voluntary caloric intake21 and it the effect would be the same nutrients were added to the metathe of then, bodys an inwould effecting intake and for weight is used, according the to day. for and
bolic pool from without or from own reserve stores. Mobilization creased quantity of utilizable fat, be the of limiting factor on the appetite, the disproportion between caloric expenditure which is necessary reduction. When actual such caloric a plan intake of treatment would vary
STIMULATIoN
UTILIZATION REDUCTION
DURING
seem
desirable
in the
treatment
obese to direct measures increased mobilization instead of relying upon of be caloric the adipose stimulated of fat restriction deposits. to oxidation to
primarily toward and utilization of the dubious abildraw If fat adequately mobilization degree, be reduced, and it
the needs of each This appears to daily other variations factors affect
individual from day to be a great advantage, in physical the energy activities requirements;
can
a sufficient can
inhibition
346 and for weight under loss these furnish required to would circumstances
THE proceed
OF CLINICAL case, tisof the leaving The for been UI) because
[Vol.
1, No. sug-
which
sues, first, nutriment the appetite large caloric maintaining eniphasized. to 4500 nothing when some weight ler day. this obese on
a considerable quota by the organism, make up time remainder. of that the must, of 3000 the have they
causes fluid retention, and this may exist. in a subclinical degree more often than is realized!. The clinical inhl)ression is gained that, with some individuals at least, salt interferes with weight loss on calorically unrestricted diets to
all
There is, therefore, observation that, obesity of necessity, calories is use(l, lose or more
water
extent not explainable by the which may be retained. general hygienic regimen including regular rest, A half-hour walk,
weight
of the
of treating
individuals an intake
A vised, slee)ing.
or the
PRACTICAL
APPLiCATION OF
exercise, before breakfast. also has been recommended. The reason for this is that, while 60 per cent of the energy needs of the body night exercise are supplied by fat fast, the l)Ioportion in the post-absorptive after can the usual be increased state.5 by calorically depends upon use of fM have to by the overby The uneffecor-
of the
entire success of treatment restricted diets, it seems, tively ganisni. Since readily following matters has stimulating th obese the patient
fat, as well as lean, of fat to three parts the proper proportion meat
understandable set
adopted by choice has been followed.22 Carbohydrate amount calculated genesis. Peters hydrate amount viduals.23 would seems The
diet
has been allowed in an not to interfere with ketofound that 100 Gm. of carboreduce to very ketogenesis,18 vary in low calorie but. time different indidiets of Strang 40 Gm. of carboand these diets protein-sparing patients on a calorically pci cases ac-
proved
during
veams. Like most sheets tions, its form is didactic: tient is likely to become points. question present it has ?principle diet
and Evans, containing only hydrate, were ketogenic,24 showed tion. In unrestricted day have a very most favorable of the
Although some may find reason to certain details, it has seemed best to it in its entirety, in the form in which been effectively used. The essential on which a calorically unrestricted appears to work-that of sufficiently difone the oxidation that of low of fat-is quite calorie diets; and it is to establish the use that quite the use its fate on W. of low matmadof a efof a
a more drastic reduction has Since most patients, though with calories, are not familiar in helpful an tity of carbohydrate, foods, it has seemed of a few 20 Gm. Liberal lowed. value eases foods containing of carbohydrate Salt
seemed necessary. they are familiar with the quanvarious a list of about serving. althe disalso grams, in to provide average
of the chief tasks the new orientation. Reasoning calorie diets ters applicable vertently calorically fectiveness. the calorically be has
in applying with
associated
carried
in an ordinary
unrestricted Such,
unrestricted
July-August
1953]
A. W. PENNINGTON reflections upon the lectures of Liebig, the diet underwent a suceesion features Finally, it lost diets calorically use
347
of
1856.26 sweet
modifications, which conformed as the modified identity among time nineteenth The sheet unrestricted ing the past diet four
retaining only those to current theory. Banting the many century. low for diets, calorie the
foods, libitum
its of
spread success2 and had! a permanent influence on the treatment of obesity. However, since certain details of the diet could not find a rationale in the prevailing physiology of A With itself. sleep,
fore
been in is as follows:
has
(lur-
DIET
FOR
OBESITY
this Have
diet
you
follow hour
is as alarm
as
the
a regular
eight
never breakfast.
time for a thirty-minute walk but it is necessary to walk the You eat three meat want. meat make lamb you big with The buy up the chops, grind meals the
thirty minutes regularly. Breakfast, lunch, and dinner are all the same type. day and lose seven pounds of excess weight a month. First course of each meal: One-half pound or more This part of the is three so get Good pork, diet is unlimited. parts extra meats and pork of lean beef are kidney roast You to one can part eat fat. slice steak, as much Most proportion fat enough, proportion. beef, just use Do as soup, bologna, Second meal you potatoes, fresh before paprika, not
chops.
if you
it yourself
it is cooked. Season the meat celery seed, lemon, chopped which use does time least not contain salt. of salt. Do particle
pepper before it is cooked or or celery tops, or use other foods which contain salt, salt, frankfurters. At each white a Do only mensuch
flavoring
bacon. canned
smoked ham, canned chicken, or fish or spiced meat, or salted butter. part
containing
course of each meal: This have a choice of an ordinary sweet potatoes, boiled rice,
of the diet is strictly limited. portion of any one of the following: grapefruit, coffee day before grapes, or tea five slice without oclock. else of
half
melon,
banana, a pear, raspberries At the end of each meal not Be use saccharine. to drink six glasses sure
SUMMARY
unrestricted
the homeostatic forces which normally late the appetite. Ketogensis appears key factor in the increased utilization Treatment of obesity by this method to avoid tered tails the decline in the metabolism in treatment of diet and by caloric restriction. regimen are given.
348
THE REFERENCES
JOURNAL
OF CLINICAL
in
NUTRITION
starvation
[Vol.
1, No.
J. Olin.
1.
PENNiNtroN,
A. W. : An
of obesity. 1953.
the problem
100,
alternate J. CLIN.
approach
NUTRITION
investigation
to
1:
20.
KEENEY,
MACKAY, ketonemia
E. M.
following
patients.
: Ketosis
L. K., SCHWARTZ, I. L., COTZIAS, J. H., and HARRIS, C. : Dietary of hypertension. III. The effect of
appetite and 1953. GASTINEAU, weight.
fat
ingestion
by
obese
and
and
Am.
J. Digest.
Dis.
1936.
21. RICHTER,
J.
Clin.
In-
C. P. : Total
and
1942-43,
self-regulatory
beings. Harvey
functions
Lectures
in
vestigation 3.
RYNEARSON,
animals
human
C. F.: Obesity.
1949, pp. 18, 47,
Charles
Springfield,
MCCLELLAN,
77.
4. BROWN,
E. G., and OHLSON, M. A.: Weight reduction of obese women of college age. J. Am. Dietet. A. 22: 849, 1946. 5. STRANG, J. M., and EVANS, F. A.: The energy exchange 1929. in obesity.
pp. 84, 100. W. S., and DuBoms, E. F. : Prolonged diets with a study of kidney function and J. Biot. Chem. 87 : 651, 1930. W. C. : The intermediary metabolism of acids. Phyeiot. Rev. 25 : 395, 1945. F. A., and STRANG, J. M. : A departure
J. Clin.
investigation
6:
277,
from Am.
obesity.
6.
EVANS, of
obesity
F. A., and STRANO, J. M.: The treatment with low calorie diets. J. A. M. A.
1931.
25.
KRISS,
M., and
SMITH,
A. H.:
The
change
in total
97: 7.
MoLLER,
1063,
energy ficient
16:
ment
dinav.
E.: Results of exclusively dietary in 46 cases of obesity. Acta. med. 74: 341, 1931. H.. and
of TOPPER,
treatScanobesity
26.
HARVEY,
in Relation
Disease.
Renshaw,
London,
1872,
122.
8.
MUUER,
A.:
Treatment
of
children.
and
Am.
I. Dis. Leanness.
Child.
dressed
London, respondence. PENNINGTON,
H. Febiger.
Lea
Diets low
A letter on Corpulence, Adto the Public, ed. 4. Harrison and Sons, 1885. See prefatory remarks and corWIuaAM:
1940. BONE,
varying
KiarroN,
D. D.: and
Arch.
reducing
1951.
use
of
fat
in
a weight
State
M.
J.
23:
79,
amounts
in
weight
bolic
55:
rate
262,
in obese
1935.
patients.
SHAPIRO,
mt.
Med.
RESUMEN
11.
12.
WERTHEIMER,
E.. and
tissue. The Science
B.: The
Rev.
28:
physiology 451,
of adipose
LUSK,
Physiol.
1948.
Tratam
iento
diet #{233}tico de
Ia
obesidad
sin
G.:
Saunders
13. BENEDICI,
of Nutrition, ed. 3. W. B. 1921, pp. 97, 239, 246. and signifion Nutrition. 1924-25, p. 57.
restricci#{243}n cal#{243}rica Restricci#{243}n parece obesidad calorlas telna que hacer de los solos el hidratos tratamiento de de carbono de a la las pro-
cance of metabolism. W. B. Saunders Co., 14. DuBois, E. F.. and in medical practice, Amer. Med Assoc.,
15. WIEmtzucHowsKI, function 16. WERTHEIMER, of its
posible
CHALMERS,
W. H.:
El factor cualquier
apetito de la en
M.:
supply. and
of
J. Physiol.
BEN-TOR,
obesidad lo mobilizaci#{243}n conj unto normalmente genesis aumentada tamiento parece evitar se encuentra cal#{243}rica. con parece
parece proveer y utilizaci#{243}n de las fuerzas arreglan ci ser un factor las del
aumentada grasas,
E.,
muscle.
in
Biochem.
J. 50:
que ketoen la
E.:
Endocrinol.
PETERS,
of ketosis.
J. P.: The
metabolism.
in
of foodstuffs
24:
48,
1951.
KARTIN, PETERS,
A. W.,
serum
and
lipids