Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
46
2
2
out of 5 Stars
100
Proficiency
Proficiency
Engagement
Reduction in Non- Points Proficient Earned Points Possible
% Agreement on Student Engagement items on Student Climate Survey Points Earned Points Possible
Science
33%
No Reduction
Student
Math
57%
OR
No Reduction
10
Engagement
Reading
56%
6%
4 2 0
10
Growth
Student Growth Percentile Points Earned Points Possible
73.9%
3 0.56
0.56
0.56
Reading Math
56 49
% Meeting AGHL
5 4
Points Earned
Engagement
7 7
Points Possible
Points Possible
Family
Reading Math
44% 19%
6 4
Family
10 10
5 Bonus Points
Achievement GAP
2 **
Race/Ethnicity and Special Program Achievement GAP Groups: Points will be derived by averaging points from each Ethnicity/Special Program (for a total of 4 points for Race/Ethnicity and 4 points for Special Programs) Reading PROFICIENCY American Indian Hispanic African American Pacific Islander FRL IEP LEP
District % % Proficient GAP Points Earned Points Total District % % Proficient GAP Possible Average
Math
Points Earned Points Possible Total Average
70%
2 2 0 1
4 4 4 4
2.00
73%
2 2 0 1
4 4 4 4
2.00
70%
1.00
73%
1.00
Race/Ethnicity and Special Program Achievement GAP Groups: Points will be derived by averaging points from each Ethnicity/Special Program (for a total of 3 points for Race/Ethnicity and 3 points for Special Programs)
Reading
Growth
Median SGP Points Earned Points Total Median SGP Possible Average
Math
Points Points Earned Possible Total Average
American Indian Hispanic African American Pacific Islander FRL IEP LEP
54 54 21 52
2 2 0 2
3 3 3 3
2.00
44 49 30 44
1 1 0 1
3 3 3 3
1.00
1.33
0.67
* Reduction in non-proficient calculations in math used non-transitional cut scores for 2012 and 2013 non-proficient calculations. ** All schools received 2 bonus points to accommodate statistical noise stemming from the addition of CCSS field test and CCSS replacement items in the 2013 CRT.