Scribd Logo
Hochladen

Willkommen bei Scribd!

  • 7 18 13 0204 62337 Email To 2JDC Clerk Hastings Records of Any Grievance 03628 01896 01168

    Hochgeladen von

    NevadaGadfly
    31 Ansichten25 Seiten
    Dear Ms. Purdy, Please see the attached Order of 8/19/13 granting an eflex waiver in cv11-08196. Please accord the rejected filing the filing date associated with its original submission date. CV11-01955 and CV11-01896 are easily confused, as they both have a caption that consists of "Zach Coughlin v. Washoe Legal Services"...but 01955 adds to other co-defendants (CAAW and TWS (now CIS)). Judge Stiglich's 8/19/13 Order After Hearing seems to contemplate that when a party is granted IFP status (as Coughlin was in 01896 back on 8/9/11...though the RMC refused to accord Coughlin court appointed counsel on 10/26/11 and 12/15/11, despite 01896 being a civil case and the case on appeal/petition in CR11-2064 being a criminal case that ultimately took away Coughlin's law license), they ought automatically be granted an eflex waiver, at least as to that case (though collateral estoppel seems to apply everywhere the state or county ever needs it to). The filing in 01896 is somewhat of a "time is of the essence" quality, though Mr. Garin has failed to respond to my entreaties to seek clarification from WLS's Exec. Director as to just what he meant incident to his expounding upon "black people's brains" back in early 2009. It would be nice to have an opportunity to question WCDA Bruce Hahn about his knowledge of that as well considering Hahn sat on the Northern Nevada Disciplinary Board (NNDB) Screening Panel in April 2012 that decided to put Coughlin and his family through this ridiculous, barbaric spectacle, largely based upon a 4/13/09 Order After Trial in DV08-01168 that was vacated by the 6/19/09 Final Decree of Divorce (so 2JDC Judge L. Gardner's vacated 4/13/09 Order After Trial was not only cited by Elcano as the sole reason for Coughlin's firing, but also formed one of the basis for the WCDA's Office's Hahn (whom clearly either knows not what a basis to disqualify himself from such an adjudicatory position would be (much like RJC Judge Hascheff, also a WLS Board of Directors member, whose finding that there was probable cause for the shameful 5/23/13 arrest of Coughlin (incident to RJC Bailiff John Reyes attacking Coughlin and throwing him over a bench) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LMU_qWIwZbY http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yllvEBtk6C4 Of course, RJC Judge David Clifton ruled during the 9/24/13 status conference in that RCR2013-072675 case that Coughlin would not be afforded court appointed counsel (despite Clifton indicating Coughlin could so avail himself of the Sixth Amendment at the 6/19/13 status conference), and that Coughlin had somehow waived his right to a speedy trial incident to Clifton taking Coughlin's Motion to Proceed IFP/Application for Court Appointed Counsel On The Condition That Coughlin Be Permitted to Appear as Co-Counsel and Retain All Final Decision Making Authority As to Means, Tactics, Objectives and Any Other Matter and running with it sufficient to stick Coughlin was R. Bruce Lindsay as his sole counsel (though such appointment was not even made until, at the very earliest, 6/6/13) and Lindsay allegedly waiving such rights on Coughlin's behalf (despite the fact that Lindsay had already threatened to murder Coughlin, which Coughlin reported to the RJC. Of course, Clifton abused his contempt power some more at the 5/30/13 hearing in 072675 when he made more of hsi threats to have Coughlin gagged with the duct tape the RJC Bailiffs were brandishing upon Coughlin pointing out the flaws in Clifton's scheme to stick Coughlin with Lindsay again (where Lindsay was so instrumental in the RJC's fraudulent "musicial case numbers" approach to denying Coughlin any redress or review of its fraudulent 12/20/12 Administrative Order 2012-01, which Judge Pearson rebranded as a criminal case on 3/6/13 (assigning case number RCR2012-071437, in a display of a former prosecutor turned judge losing his judicial immunity where reverting to the prosecutorial role he formerly occupied as part o

    Originaltitel

    7 18 13 0204 62337 Email to 2JDC Clerk Hastings Records of Any Grievance 03628 01896 01168

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Verfügbare Formate

    PDF, TXT oder online auf Scribd lesen

    Stufen Sie dieses Dokument als nützlich ein?

    Sind diese Inhalte unangemessen?

    Dieses Dokument melden
    Dear Ms. Purdy, Please see the attached Order of 8/19/13 granting an eflex waiver in cv11-08196. Please accord the rejected filing the filing date associated with its original submission date. CV11-01955 and CV11-01896 are easily confused, as they both have a caption that consists of "Zach Coughlin v. Washoe Legal Services"...but 01955 adds to other co-defendants (CAAW and TWS (now CIS)). Judge Stiglich's 8/19/13 Order After Hearing seems to contemplate that when a party is granted IFP status (as Coughlin was in 01896 back on 8/9/11...though the RMC refused to accord Coughlin court appointed counsel on 10/26/11 and 12/15/11, despite 01896 being a civil case and the case on appeal/petition in CR11-2064 being a criminal case that ultimately took away Coughlin's law license), they ought automatically be granted an eflex waiver, at least as to that case (though collateral estoppel seems to apply everywhere the state or county ever needs it to). The filing in 01896 is somewhat of a "time is of the essence" quality, though Mr. Garin has failed to respond to my entreaties to seek clarification from WLS's Exec. Director as to just what he meant incident to his expounding upon "black people's brains" back in early 2009. It would be nice to have an opportunity to question WCDA Bruce Hahn about his knowledge of that as well considering Hahn sat on the Northern Nevada Disciplinary Board (NNDB) Screening Panel in April 2012 that decided to put Coughlin and his family through this ridiculous, barbaric spectacle, largely based upon a 4/13/09 Order After Trial in DV08-01168 that was vacated by the 6/19/09 Final Decree of Divorce (so 2JDC Judge L. Gardner's vacated 4/13/09 Order After Trial was not only cited by Elcano as the sole reason for Coughlin's firing, but also formed one of the basis for the WCDA's Office's Hahn (whom clearly either knows not what a basis to disqualify himself from such an adjudicatory position would be (much like RJC Judge Hascheff, also a WLS Board of Directors member, whose finding that there was probable cause for the shameful 5/23/13 arrest of Coughlin (incident to RJC Bailiff John Reyes attacking Coughlin and throwing him over a bench) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LMU_qWIwZbY http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yllvEBtk6C4 Of course, RJC Judge David Clifton ruled during the 9/24/13 status conference in that RCR2013-072675 case that Coughlin would not be afforded court appointed counsel (despite Clifton indicating Coughlin could so avail himself of the Sixth Amendment at the 6/19/13 status conference), and that Coughlin had somehow waived his right to a speedy trial incident to Clifton taking Coughlin's Motion to Proceed IFP/Application for Court Appointed Counsel On The Condition That Coughlin Be Permitted to Appear as Co-Counsel and Retain All Final Decision Making Authority As to Means, Tactics, Objectives and Any Other Matter and running with it sufficient to stick Coughlin was R. Bruce Lindsay as his sole counsel (though such appointment was not even made until, at the very earliest, 6/6/13) and Lindsay allegedly waiving such rights on Coughlin's behalf (despite the fact that Lindsay had already threatened to murder Coughlin, which Coughlin reported to the RJC. Of course, Clifton abused his contempt power some more at the 5/30/13 hearing in 072675 when he made more of hsi threats to have Coughlin gagged with the duct tape the RJC Bailiffs were brandishing upon Coughlin pointing out the flaws in Clifton's scheme to stick Coughlin with Lindsay again (where Lindsay was so instrumental in the RJC's fraudulent "musicial case numbers" approach to denying Coughlin any redress or review of its fraudulent 12/20/12 Administrative Order 2012-01, which Judge Pearson rebranded as a criminal case on 3/6/13 (assigning case number RCR2012-071437, in a display of a former prosecutor turned judge losing his judicial immunity where reverting to the prosecutorial role he formerly occupied as part o

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Als PDF, TXT herunterladen oder online auf Scribd lesen
    Markieren Sie unangemessene Inhalte
    31 Ansichten25 Seiten

    7 18 13 0204 62337 Email To 2JDC Clerk Hastings Records of Any Grievance 03628 01896 01168

    Hochgeladen von

    NevadaGadfly
    Dear Ms. Purdy, Please see the attached Order of 8/19/13 granting an eflex waiver in cv11-08196. Please accord the rejected filing the filing date associated with its original submission date. CV11-01955 and CV11-01896 are easily confused, as they both have a caption that consists of "Zach Coughlin v. Washoe Legal Services"...but 01955 adds to other co-defendants (CAAW and TWS (now CIS)). Judge Stiglich's 8/19/13 Order After Hearing seems to contemplate that when a party is granted IFP status (as Coughlin was in 01896 back on 8/9/11...though the RMC refused to accord Coughlin court appointed counsel on 10/26/11 and 12/15/11, despite 01896 being a civil case and the case on appeal/petition in CR11-2064 being a criminal case that ultimately took away Coughlin's law license), they ought automatically be granted an eflex waiver, at least as to that case (though collateral estoppel seems to apply everywhere the state or county ever needs it to). The filing in 01896 is somewhat of a "time is of the essence" quality, though Mr. Garin has failed to respond to my entreaties to seek clarification from WLS's Exec. Director as to just what he meant incident to his expounding upon "black people's brains" back in early 2009. It would be nice to have an opportunity to question WCDA Bruce Hahn about his knowledge of that as well considering Hahn sat on the Northern Nevada Disciplinary Board (NNDB) Screening Panel in April 2012 that decided to put Coughlin and his family through this ridiculous, barbaric spectacle, largely based upon a 4/13/09 Order After Trial in DV08-01168 that was vacated by the 6/19/09 Final Decree of Divorce (so 2JDC Judge L. Gardner's vacated 4/13/09 Order After Trial was not only cited by Elcano as the sole reason for Coughlin's firing, but also formed one of the basis for the WCDA's Office's Hahn (whom clearly either knows not what a basis to disqualify himself from such an adjudicatory position would be (much like RJC Judge Hascheff, also a WLS Board of Directors member, whose finding that there was probable cause for the shameful 5/23/13 arrest of Coughlin (incident to RJC Bailiff John Reyes attacking Coughlin and throwing him over a bench) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LMU_qWIwZbY http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yllvEBtk6C4 Of course, RJC Judge David Clifton ruled during the 9/24/13 status conference in that RCR2013-072675 case that Coughlin would not be afforded court appointed counsel (despite Clifton indicating Coughlin could so avail himself of the Sixth Amendment at the 6/19/13 status conference), and that Coughlin had somehow waived his right to a speedy trial incident to Clifton taking Coughlin's Motion to Proceed IFP/Application for Court Appointed Counsel On The Condition That Coughlin Be Permitted to Appear as Co-Counsel and Retain All Final Decision Making Authority As to Means, Tactics, Objectives and Any Other Matter and running with it sufficient to stick Coughlin was R. Bruce Lindsay as his sole counsel (though such appointment was not even made until, at the very earliest, 6/6/13) and Lindsay allegedly waiving such rights on Coughlin's behalf (despite the fact that Lindsay had already threatened to murder Coughlin, which Coughlin reported to the RJC. Of course, Clifton abused his contempt power some more at the 5/30/13 hearing in 072675 when he made more of hsi threats to have Coughlin gagged with the duct tape the RJC Bailiffs were brandishing upon Coughlin pointing out the flaws in Clifton's scheme to stick Coughlin with Lindsay again (where Lindsay was so instrumental in the RJC's fraudulent "musicial case numbers" approach to denying Coughlin any redress or review of its fraudulent 12/20/12 Administrative Order 2012-01, which Judge Pearson rebranded as a criminal case on 3/6/13 (assigning case number RCR2012-071437, in a display of a former prosecutor turned judge losing his judicial immunity where reverting to the prosecutorial role he formerly occupied as part o

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Als PDF, TXT herunterladen oder online auf Scribd lesen
    Markieren Sie unangemessene Inhalte
    von 25

    10/7/13

    Outlook Print Message

    https://bay176.mail.live.com/mail/PrintMessages.aspx?cpids=e84a9dc9-1b47-439b-91fe-f218d4815702,m&isSafe=false&FolderID=66666666-6666-6666-6666-

    1/25

    10/7/13

    Outlook Print Message

    https://bay176.mail.live.com/mail/PrintMessages.aspx?cpids=e84a9dc9-1b47-439b-91fe-f218d4815702,m&isSafe=false&FolderID=66666666-6666-6666-6666-

    2/25

    10/7/13

    Outlook Print Message

    https://bay176.mail.live.com/mail/PrintMessages.aspx?cpids=e84a9dc9-1b47-439b-91fe-f218d4815702,m&isSafe=false&FolderID=66666666-6666-6666-6666-

    3/25

    10/7/13

    Outlook Print Message

    https://bay176.mail.live.com/mail/PrintMessages.aspx?cpids=e84a9dc9-1b47-439b-91fe-f218d4815702,m&isSafe=false&FolderID=66666666-6666-6666-6666-

    4/25

    10/7/13

    Outlook Print Message

    https://bay176.mail.live.com/mail/PrintMessages.aspx?cpids=e84a9dc9-1b47-439b-91fe-f218d4815702,m&isSafe=false&FolderID=66666666-6666-6666-6666-

    5/25

    10/7/13

    Outlook Print Message

    https://bay176.mail.live.com/mail/PrintMessages.aspx?cpids=e84a9dc9-1b47-439b-91fe-f218d4815702,m&isSafe=false&FolderID=66666666-6666-6666-6666-

    6/25

    10/7/13

    Outlook Print Message

    https://bay176.mail.live.com/mail/PrintMessages.aspx?cpids=e84a9dc9-1b47-439b-91fe-f218d4815702,m&isSafe=false&FolderID=66666666-6666-6666-6666-

    7/25

    10/7/13

    Outlook Print Message

    https://bay176.mail.live.com/mail/PrintMessages.aspx?cpids=e84a9dc9-1b47-439b-91fe-f218d4815702,m&isSafe=false&FolderID=66666666-6666-6666-6666-

    8/25

    10/7/13

    Outlook Print Message

    https://bay176.mail.live.com/mail/PrintMessages.aspx?cpids=e84a9dc9-1b47-439b-91fe-f218d4815702,m&isSafe=false&FolderID=66666666-6666-6666-6666-

    9/25

    10/7/13

    Outlook Print Message

    https://bay176.mail.live.com/mail/PrintMessages.aspx?cpids=e84a9dc9-1b47-439b-91fe-f218d4815702,m&isSafe=false&FolderID=66666666-6666-6666-6666

    10/25

    10/7/13

    Outlook Print Message

    https://bay176.mail.live.com/mail/PrintMessages.aspx?cpids=e84a9dc9-1b47-439b-91fe-f218d4815702,m&isSafe=false&FolderID=66666666-6666-6666-6666

    11/25

    10/7/13

    Outlook Print Message

    https://bay176.mail.live.com/mail/PrintMessages.aspx?cpids=e84a9dc9-1b47-439b-91fe-f218d4815702,m&isSafe=false&FolderID=66666666-6666-6666-6666

    12/25

    10/7/13

    Outlook Print Message

    https://bay176.mail.live.com/mail/PrintMessages.aspx?cpids=e84a9dc9-1b47-439b-91fe-f218d4815702,m&isSafe=false&FolderID=66666666-6666-6666-6666

    13/25

    10/7/13

    Outlook Print Message

    https://bay176.mail.live.com/mail/PrintMessages.aspx?cpids=e84a9dc9-1b47-439b-91fe-f218d4815702,m&isSafe=false&FolderID=66666666-6666-6666-6666

    14/25

    10/7/13

    Outlook Print Message

    https://bay176.mail.live.com/mail/PrintMessages.aspx?cpids=e84a9dc9-1b47-439b-91fe-f218d4815702,m&isSafe=false&FolderID=66666666-6666-6666-6666

    15/25

    10/7/13

    Outlook Print Message

    https://bay176.mail.live.com/mail/PrintMessages.aspx?cpids=e84a9dc9-1b47-439b-91fe-f218d4815702,m&isSafe=false&FolderID=66666666-6666-6666-6666

    16/25

    10/7/13

    Outlook Print Message

    https://bay176.mail.live.com/mail/PrintMessages.aspx?cpids=e84a9dc9-1b47-439b-91fe-f218d4815702,m&isSafe=false&FolderID=66666666-6666-6666-6666

    17/25

    10/7/13

    Outlook Print Message

    https://bay176.mail.live.com/mail/PrintMessages.aspx?cpids=e84a9dc9-1b47-439b-91fe-f218d4815702,m&isSafe=false&FolderID=66666666-6666-6666-6666

    18/25

    10/7/13

    Outlook Print Message

    https://bay176.mail.live.com/mail/PrintMessages.aspx?cpids=e84a9dc9-1b47-439b-91fe-f218d4815702,m&isSafe=false&FolderID=66666666-6666-6666-6666

    19/25

    10/7/13

    Outlook Print Message

    https://bay176.mail.live.com/mail/PrintMessages.aspx?cpids=e84a9dc9-1b47-439b-91fe-f218d4815702,m&isSafe=false&FolderID=66666666-6666-6666-6666

    20/25

    10/7/13

    Outlook Print Message

    https://bay176.mail.live.com/mail/PrintMessages.aspx?cpids=e84a9dc9-1b47-439b-91fe-f218d4815702,m&isSafe=false&FolderID=66666666-6666-6666-6666

    21/25

    10/7/13

    Outlook Print Message

    https://bay176.mail.live.com/mail/PrintMessages.aspx?cpids=e84a9dc9-1b47-439b-91fe-f218d4815702,m&isSafe=false&FolderID=66666666-6666-6666-6666

    22/25

    10/7/13

    Outlook Print Message

    https://bay176.mail.live.com/mail/PrintMessages.aspx?cpids=e84a9dc9-1b47-439b-91fe-f218d4815702,m&isSafe=false&FolderID=66666666-6666-6666-6666

    23/25

    10/7/13

    Outlook Print Message

    https://bay176.mail.live.com/mail/PrintMessages.aspx?cpids=e84a9dc9-1b47-439b-91fe-f218d4815702,m&isSafe=false&FolderID=66666666-6666-6666-6666

    24/25

    10/7/13

    Outlook Print Message

    https://bay176.mail.live.com/mail/PrintMessages.aspx?cpids=e84a9dc9-1b47-439b-91fe-f218d4815702,m&isSafe=false&FolderID=66666666-6666-6666-6666

    25/25

    Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen