Rubric for E-portfolio

Criteria Selection of Evidence Not Yet Meeting Expectations Approaching Expectations Meeting Expectations Exceeding Expectations Rating

40% of total score

The evidence and work samples do not relate to the purpose of the eportfolio.

Some of the evidence and work samples are related to the purpose of the e-portfolio.

Most evidence and work samples are related to the purpose of the eportfolio.

All evidence and work samples are clearly and directly related to the purpose of the eportfolio. A wide variety of pieces are included. All reflections clearly describe growth, achievement, accomplishments, and include goals for continued learning (long and short term). All of the photographs, concept maps, spreadsheets, graphics, audio and/or video files effectively enhance

Reflection

30% of total score

The reflections do not describe growth or include goals for continued learning.

A few of the reflections describe growth and include goals for continued learning.

Most of the reflections describe growth and include goals for continued learning.

Use of Multimedia

10% of total score

The graphic elements or multimedia do not contribute to understanding concepts, ideas and relationships. The inappropriate use of multimedia detracts from

Some of the graphic elements and multimedia do not contribute to understanding concepts, ideas and relationships.

Most of the graphic elements and multimedia contribute to understanding concepts, ideas and relationships,

Rubric for E-portfolio

the content. enhance the written understanding of material and create concepts, ideas and interest. relationships, create interest, and are appropriate for the chosen purpose. A few of the audio and/or video artifacts are edited with inconsistent clarity or sound (too loud/too soft/garbled). The navigation links are somewhat confusing, and it is often unclear how to locate evidence or move to related pages or a different section. Some of the pages connect to the subject, but in other places the Most of the audio and/or video artifacts are edited with proper voice projection, appropriate language, and clear delivery. The navigation links generally function well, but it is not always clear how to locate evidence or move to related pages or different section. Most of the pages connect to the subject. Most of the All audio and/or video artifacts are edited with proper voice projection, appropriate language, and clear delivery. The navigation links are intuitive. The various parts of the portfolio are labeled, clearly organized and allow the reader to easily locate evidence and move to related pages or a different section. All pages

Audio and/or video artifacts are not edited or exhibit inconsistent clarity or sound (too loud/too soft/garbled).

Navigation

5% of total score

The navigation links are confusing, and it is difficult to locate evidence and move to related pages or a different section. There are significant problems with pages connecting to preceding pages or the subject. Many of the external links do not

Rubric for E-portfolio

connect to the appropriate links do not connect website or file. to preceding pages. Some of the external links do not connect to the appropriate website or file. external links connect to the appropriate website or file. connect to the subject, and all external links connect to the appropriate website or file.

Layout and Readability

5% of total score

The e-portfolio is difficult to read due to inappropriate use of fonts, type size for headings, sub-headings and text and font styles (italic, bold, underline). Many formatting tools are under or over-utilized and decrease the readers' accessibility to the content.

The E-portfolio is The e-portfolio is often difficult to read generally easy to due to inappropriate read. use of fonts and type size for headings, subheadings and text or inconsistent use of font styles (italic, bold, underline). Some formatting tools are under or over-utilized and

The e-portfolio is easy to read.

Rubric for E-portfolio

decrease the readers' accessibility to the content.

Color of background, fonts, and links decreases the readability of the text, is distracting and used inconsistently throughout the e-portfolio.

Color of background, fonts, and links decreases the readability of the text, is distracting and used inconsistently in some places throughout the eportfolio.

Color, background, font styles, and type size for headings, subheadings and text are generally used consistently throughout the eportfolio.

Color, background, font styles (italic, bold, underline) and type size for headings, subheadings and text are used consistently and enhance the readability throughout the eportfolio.

Horizontal and vertical white space alignment is

Horizontal and vertical white space

Horizontal and Horizontal and vertical white space vertical white space

Rubric for E-portfolio

used inappropriately, and alignment is the content appears sometimes used disorganized and cluttered. inappropriately to organize content.
Quality of Writing and Proofreading

alignment is generally used appropriately to organize content. The writing is largely free of grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors. The style of writing generally facilitates communication and minor editing is required.

alignment is used appropriately to organize content. The writing is free of grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors. The style of writing facilitates communication and no editing is required.

10% of total score

There are numerous grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors. The style of writing does not facilitate effective communication and requires major editing and revision.

The writing includes include some grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors that distract the reader and requires some editing and revision.

Total

/100 marks