Sie sind auf Seite 1von 8

Kimberly Rankin

System Analysis and Design

Section #1

Instructor: Dr. Eustache Placide

6.5
Operational feasibility Functionality: A description to what degree the Lacrimal Biometric System would benefit the organization and how well the system would work. Political: A description of how well this solution would be received from both user management , user and organization perspective.

Feasibility Analysis Matrix


Weight Candidate 1 (%) Candidate 2 Candidate 3

30%

The Theidea ideaof ofthis this system systemis isgood. good. Biologocal Biologocal identification identification cannotbe be cannot falsified.The The falsified. DualSystem System Dual makes security makes security system harder system harder to to breach. breach. Score : 100 Score : 100 The Thesystem systemis is currently in the currently in the patternstage stagewith pattern with theof help of the help technologythe the technology commercial cimmercial stage stage is is attainable attainable Score : 100 Score : 98

Supported the statement of Candidate 1

Disagree because of the fear of using the swab; and wouldn't want to cry every time one has to enter the workplace.

Score: 100 Is a bit hesitant of product moving to commercial Same satge as candidae 1

Score : 60 Disagree, cannot see where product would move from to commercial stage.

Technical Feasibility Technology: An assessment of the maturity , availibity (or ability to acquire), and desirability of the computer technology needed to support this system Expertise: An assessment of the technical expertise needed to develop , operate , and maintain the candidate system.

30%

Score: 70 Score : 100 Approximately Approximately$ 62,990 Score : Approximately 9460 See milestone 6.4 Score:100 66months months Score: 95 Score : 47.9

Score: 40 Approximately $ 125,980.00 Approximately $ 60,300 See milestone Approximately $ 6.4 Score:100 Score : 1 1year Year Score:80 Score : 0.04

Economic Feasibility Economic Feasibility Cost to develop: Cost to develope: Payback period: Net present Value: Netpresent Value: Detailed Calculations 30%

Detailed Caculations:

Approximately 41,993 Approximately 6,307 See milestone 6.4 Score: 100

Schedule Feasibility An assessment of how long the solution will take to design and implement. Ranking

10% 100%

4 months Score:100
64.5

vxvvfvzvnzxcPage 51xbv

Kimberly Rankin

System Analysis and Design

Section #1

Instructor: Dr. Eustache Placide

vxvvfvzvnzxcPage 51xbv

Kimberly Rankin

System Analysis and Design

Section #1

Instructor: Dr. Eustache Placide

vxvvfvzvnzxcPage 51xbv

Kimberly Rankin

System Analysis and Design

Section #1

Instructor: Dr. Eustache Placide

vxvvfvzvnzxcPage 51xbv

Kimberly Rankin

System Analysis and Design

Section #1

Instructor: Dr. Eustache Placide

e has to

vxvvfvzvnzxcPage 51xbv

Kimberly Rankin

System Analysis and Design

Section #1

Instructor: Dr. Eustache Placide

vxvvfvzvnzxcPage 51xbv

Kimberly Rankin

System Analysis and Design

Section #1

Instructor: Dr. Eustache Placide

vxvvfvzvnzxcPage 51xbv

Kimberly Rankin

System Analysis and Design

Section #1

Instructor: Dr. Eustache Placide

vxvvfvzvnzxcPage 51xbv

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen