.

  . 

 

)2011- (3

.
.

99

 .
  . 

 

)2011- (3

.
. ,
) (200 ) (100 ) (100 .

.
.

100

2011- (3)



 .   
 .

The differences in locus of control and self-concept between gifted

and normal pupils in basic schools in Gezira State- Sudan

Abstract
Key words : Locus of Control, Self Concept, gifted normal pupils
The study aimed at identifying the differences between the gifted and the normal pupils
of the fourth class at the basic schools, Gezira State, with reference to locus of control
and self-concept. The study also aimed at identifying the nature of the correlation
between the locus of control and self-concept as far as the gifted and the normal pupils
are concerned. The study adopted two parts of the descriptive method: the correlational
and the causal comparative. The tools of the study included locus of control scale selfconcept scale, and Stanford Binet scale which were applied to (200) male and female
pupils; (100) of them were gifted and (100) were normal pupils. The most important
results of the study indicated that there were statistically significant differences between
the gifted and the normal pupils with reference to the locus of control and self- concept
in favour of the gifted, while there was negative correlation between the locus of control
and the self-concept as far as the gifted and the normal pupils are concerned.

101

 .
  . 

 

)2011- (3

) (323 2007
.




) (2 2004


.

).(108 : 1993 , ) 2007
(31



.

.
) (240 2001
) (36 1995 Locus of Control

. ) (159 1991 .

102

 .
  . 

 

)2011- (3

).(7 : 2004 ,

.
-:
-

.

.
.

103

 .
  . 

 

)2011- (3

. . )( )(.

:
:
: . : 2010 .2011
:Locus of Control
) ( 1991
.
: Self-concept
).(1984
:Gifted
.

104

 .
  . 

 

)2011- (3

:Normal Achievers
) %60 (%75 2009 2010 110 100
.
:Basic Level ) (34 2000
.

:
) (2002
) (
)(247 :2002 ,
) (22 ,2002

.
) (1978
) (1981

)(59 :2005 ,

:

(130) Terman ).(51 :2007 ,

105

 .
  . 

 

)2011- (3

Dunlop ):2005 ,
: (389
: 120 135 .
: 135 170 .
) ( .170
) (24 2006 Grunchsank :
: 120 135 %5 .%10
: 135 170 %1 .%3
: 170 .%0,00001

Locus of Control

) . (51 : 1999 Mayers ) (20 2004
.
)(10 ,1993 :
. .

106

 .
  . 

 

)2011- (3

( 123 1995 )Smith and Macki ,
( 512, 2000) Carlson Self-schema
.
) (54 2007

. ) (191 1999

, .


) .(71 : 1997 ,

).( 25 :2003,

)(2004
.
.
.
.

107

 .
  . 

 

)2011- (3

) (1998 ) ( . ) (60
.
) (16 ) (740
.
) (1997 )
( . ) (394 .

.
.
) (2006 ) :
( .
..
.
) (2005
. ) (135 ) (64
.
) K night (1995 .

.

108

 .
  . 

 

)2011- (3

) (1994 ) : (
)) (169 ( .
.
)(1993 ) (125
. .
.
) (1992
) (1100 .

.
,
,
, ) (2005 ) (1998 .
) (1995 ) (1997 .

.
.

109

 .
  . 

 

)2011- (3

. 2011/2010 ) (200
:
: ) (100 : ) (100 . )(1

31%

23

12

18

62

25

12.5%

27

13.5%

16

8%

21

10.5%

10

10

32

16%

17

8.5%

50

50

50

50

200

100%

Locus of Control Scale
) (
) (Stephen Nowicke ) 1957 (Bonie Strickland

110

 .
  . 

 

)2011- (3

) (1991


. )(40
) , (0,80
. ) 0 (40
.

) .(1984 ) (72
) (4 .


.
) (0. 72 ).(0. 85

) ( 2003 ) ( . 73 ).( . 94

-:
.

111

 .
  . 

 

)2011- (3

) (T.test .
) (Pearson .

.
) ( .
T. test
.
)(2
)( T. test

100

14.65

6.25

198

100

23.74

7.21

9.51

0.00

) (2
)( )9.51( ) (0.000 .
) (14.65 ) ( 23.74 ) (1
,
.

112

 .
  . 

 

)2011- (3

)(1

) (
)( T test
.
)(3
)( T .test

100

65.31

20.50

198

8.139

0.00

100

44.57

16.12

) (3
)( ) (8.139 ) (0.000 .
) (65.31 ) (44.57 ) (2

113

 .
  . 

 

)2011- (3

, ,
.

)(2

) -
-( . ) (Pearson Correlation
.
)(4
) = (100

0.815

0.01

114

 .
  . 

 

)2011- (3

) ( 4 ) (0.01
)0.815(
.
)(5
) =(100

0.559

0.01

) (0.01
) 0.559( .

) (2 ) (0.000


.
.



.

115

 .
  . 

 

)2011- (3

. ) (128 2001



.

.
) ( 2006
) ( 1995
. ) (157 2005
) (2004
.
) (3
) (0.000


.
) (12 1996

116

 .
  . 

 

)2011- (3

. ) (35 ,1986
.
) (1996

) (2005 . ) (1992
. )(1993

.


) (4 ) (5


.


.

.
) (Aggarwol, 1974
) .(12 : 2005 ,
).(Yong, 1994

117

 .
  . 

 

)2011- (3

:

.
.

.

:

.
.
.

118

 .
  . 

 

)2011- (3

:
.1 ).(2000
34 1 .45
.2 ) .(2001
. 266 -239
.3 .(1995).
59 ,80 .88
.4 ) .(1986 .
, : .
.5 ) .(1993
,7,(6)2,.39
.6 , ) .(1997 . 3 : .
.7 ) . (2002 . : .
.8 ) .(2007 30. 5 .37
.9 ) .(2004
, 9,(29)9,.45
.10 ) .(1998
.
.11 ).(2007 . : .
.12 ) .(1999 3 : .

119

 .
  . 

 

)2011- (3

.13 ) .(1997
35, 26 .70
.14 ) . (2006 . : .
.15 ) . (2002
12 ,1 .25
.16 ) .(2005 . : .
.17 ) .(2007 : .
.18 ) .(2005 . : .
.19 ) .(1997 .
. .
.20 . (1990) . ) (
2 617..637
.21 ).(2004 2 ,10. .23
.22 ) .(1993 . : .
.23 ) .(2001 . : .
.24 , ) . (2007 ,: .

:
.25 ) .(2003 .
.
-26 ) .(2005
. , , , .

120

  .
  . 

 

)2011- (3

.27 ) .(2005 .
, .
.28 ) .(1998 .
,.
.30 ) .(1997 .
,.
.31 ) .(2009
. ,
,.

:
40. Carlson, E. (2000). Psychology. New York : Allyn and Bacon,.
Corrnell, D. et al. (1992). Characteristic of elementary students entering gifted

41.

programme, the Leading outcomes at University of Victoria, Eric Document

No E.
Hawkins, D. G. (1993). Personality Factors Affecting Achievement in

42.

Achieving Gifted, Under achieving Gifted and Non-gifted Elementary

Students. Dissertation Abstract, University of Victoria.
Knight, Yong (2005). A Decade Comparison Self Concept of Gifted and Non-

43.

231. gifted Adolescents. International Educational Journal.6(2).224

121

2011- (3)



 .   
 .

44. Moroe, M. M. (2006). Variation in Test Anxiety and Locus of Control Orientation in
Achieving and Under Achieving Gifted and Non Gifted Middle School
Students. Unpublished Doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut.
45. Mayers and David (2004). Psychology. Seventh Edition, New York: Worth Publishers
46. Smith, E. (1995). Social Psychology. New York: Wroth Publisher

122