Sie sind auf Seite 1von 6
Implementing Alternative Transportation Funding Methods Evaluation Criteria and Funding Method Implementation Exhibit 1. Evaluation Framework GOAL: Develop a package of func Creare tes RKC tu) BOC Ra clea u ee at Ela: \g tools that the legislature can consider to meet ‘transportation funding objectives. THRESHOLD CRITERIA: Does the funding method meet the following two criteria? It Poe ne acss Citenssenetent Revenue Stream Provide a stream of Public Benefit - Reflects Use | Equitable _ Funding burden is revenue Provide a clear purpose geographically commensurate with and policy rationale equitable and transportation linked to transportation equitably allocates system funding system use, economic the costs to those needs development and other who benefit state policies and goals. L Local ‘Allows for viable local transportation funding options that recognize the distinct needs of different local systems, Te enh ee eu Revenue Stream Public Benefit - Equitable Revenue Reflects Use Costs reflect potential Link to user benefits Responsive to transportation Costs reflect inflation & growth service or facility user impact Stable & Reflects use Costs reflect predictable Available to fund a geographic ‘Administration full range of variation Collection cost transpormalion Cost impact on Federal choices low tax base ‘compatibility Positively affects ‘communities transportation system performance &other state policies & goals Creates and grows system connections Local Provides revenue stream that could support local systems Provides an ‘opportunity for viable local options Promotes continuity of transportation system Sept. 30, 2009 DRAFT Exhibit 2. is lower priority for $10,000 © vagh $1,000 mechum $500 @ tow a00 ‘A. Barrel Fee ($1.00 per barrel) (16 year total, $miions, You) ‘current Yield Implementing Alternative Transportation Funding Methods Evaluation Criteria and Funding Method implementation Screening of Funding Methods 3) Option 1 - Increase fee (For each additional $0.05) Option 2- Index or Increase fee Over Time B. Motor Fuel Tax ($0.375 per gallon) @ _ 522,090m| 7) Option 1 - Index 8) Option 2-Add special sales tx (6.5%) Option 3- Add gross receipts tax (for each 1% inerease| in tax rate) ¢ +10) Option 4 - Add petroleum company tax (for each $0.05 per gation) Option 5 - Vary by county (increase In mast populous ‘counties for large Infrastructure projects) 11) ‘Sept. 30, 2009 DRAFT Implementing Alternative Transportation Funding Methods Evaluation Criteria and Funding Method implementation é 2 @ 510,000 @ righ E f a a i 3 z 2,000 esta 3 3 e 3 © Med i Plas E 4 ® — $500 @uw s s 3 3 te 5 2/3 /§ @ — si00 8 Ee : a\4 Hy 3 Ouaaitan 5 ae § i 5 " 5 16) D. Alternative Fuels Taxes o NEW oe @ @ 2 N/A 2) @ oo 17) Option 1 -Eecc/Natirel Ges Vehicle FuclTox || — NEW etolol > |miololo 15) A. Highway Falty Tolls OP exsmns | Osis] mm | | o fo [vs [| | | 720) Option 1 Expand allowed ves of tol revenues NEW oO | 3 | 616 | vs |xeujecaiac 21) Option 2 - Expand facility tolling @ NEW ry 2 oe @ ‘YES wy 2 S 22) Option 3 Segment Tol =| New ee a ae 24) B. Highway Congestion Pricing. 3 Texstine | O. saoM| (sR 167)| 71S Twfeftelo 4) Qatan f= Board HOT ens ah cngeton BT wear ® |o lo] o | a lteuleewlne 26] Option 7 Vorlable tas on tolled oadkToiges NeW oe [ oo] ws finouifias 22) Option 32one-heted or coniontoling NEW 66-13 | e_| vs |ioniluenilne! © Highway Systemwide Pring: Vehide Milee ei 28) Traveled (VMM) Pricir NEW e 2) @ @ NO. e e 7 Onc Vey it conserve 29) ‘emits NEW oe @ @ e NO. @ @ e 30) Option 2 - Vary by road type __ at = NEW oe o o@ eo NO. o > o 31) eee Pricing - Truck Weight/VMT @ NEW @ 5 ° e ol iS 5) 5 32) Option 1 - Add truck weight mile tax NEW 2 2 @ @ NO @ a > ay) & senses ‘State Ferries (WSF) Fares (2.5% Anes Leona SHliSslasalnoalee) 34) Option 1 - Fuel Surcharge NEW ® @ YES ' @ 35) Option 2 Adaptive Management Srategies NEW @ © vs Lo | 36) Coton 3 Nonvesident pang KEW o Tete we fo poe Sept. 30, 2009 DRAFT 7