Buddhist Inference used to structure (both sattvaanumaan.a and)hetvaabhaasaanumaan.a. 1. Paks.adharmataa hetus presence in the paks.a, or site 2.

2. Anva a positive concomitance! hs ". # atireka ne$ative concomitance! %h%s A. &'ose' re'ated to (rairuup a) 1. Paks.adharmataa 2. *imi'ar ". %+issimi'ar B. Potentia' Prob'ems) 1. Inductive a. not necessar b. accepted as va'id c. ,mpiricist -a.im) /It is not possib'e to demonstrate that a reason (hetu) conve s a thin$ (artha) be ond the ran$e of sense0or$ans, 1ithout removin$ the suspicion that it ma be a pseudo0reason (hetvaabhaasa).2 i. Be ond the current ran$e (e.$. fire behind a hi'') ii.3r be ond the possib'e ran$e (e.$. substance) 2. # atireka is derived from (imp'ied b ) anva a (cf. 45.607) a. den in$ the antecedent b. %s%h (modus to''ens) is possib'e c. *o'ution) h8s, thus %h8%s. i. 9ecurrence of prob'em 1. ,'aborated :o$ica' *tructure (pra o$a) based on Buddhist Inference (cf. 45.405)) (paks.adharmataa) 1. (he thin$s 1hich are in dispute e.ist a. (he hetu obtains in the paks.a (anva a) 2. A'' e.istent thin$s are momentar a. i.e., ob;ects of sense0perception ". <on0e.istent thin$s are non0momentar (v atireka) a. <either 1ithout the hetu (sattva) nor 1ithout the paks.a (thin$s) does this inference ho'd true. P'ace of the hetvaabhaasaanumaan.a) It is the subproof (1a) re=uired to estab'ish that the reason propert , sattva, actua'' obtains at the site (paks.a) and a'so takes on the three0fo'd structure of Buddhist inference.