Scribd Logo
Hochladen

Willkommen bei Scribd!

  • Pacete v. Commission On Appointments (1971) Digest

    Hochgeladen von

    Homer
    1K Ansichten2 Seiten
    This case involves the interpretation of the powers of the Commission on Appointments under the Constitution. Specifically, it analyzes whether the mere filing of a motion for reconsideration automatically cancels the confirmation of an appointment, or if it only reopens the appointment for approval or disapproval by the majority of the Commission's members. The controlling principle is the Altarejos v. Solo case, which interpreted the revised rules of the Commission on Appointments. It held that a motion for reconsideration does not invalidate a confirmation, but only reopens the appointment for approval or disapproval by the Commission's majority. There is also a distinction between appointments made during Congress' recess and those made while Congress is in session.

    Originalbeschreibung:

    Pacete v. Commission on Appointments (1971) Digest

    Originaltitel

    Pacete v. Commission on Appointments (1971) Digest

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Verfügbare Formate

    DOC, PDF, TXT oder online auf Scribd lesen

    Stufen Sie dieses Dokument als nützlich ein?

    Sind diese Inhalte unangemessen?

    Dieses Dokument melden
    This case involves the interpretation of the powers of the Commission on Appointments under the Constitution. Specifically, it analyzes whether the mere filing of a motion for reconsideration automatically cancels the confirmation of an appointment, or if it only reopens the appointment for approval or disapproval by the majority of the Commission's members. The controlling principle is the Altarejos v. Solo case, which interpreted the revised rules of the Commission on Appointments. It held that a motion for reconsideration does not invalidate a confirmation, but only reopens the appointment for approval or disapproval by the Commission's majority. There is also a distinction between appointments made during Congress' recess and those made while Congress is in session.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Als DOC, PDF, TXT herunterladen oder online auf Scribd lesen
    Markieren Sie unangemessene Inhalte
    1K Ansichten2 Seiten

    Pacete v. Commission On Appointments (1971) Digest

    Hochgeladen von

    Homer
    This case involves the interpretation of the powers of the Commission on Appointments under the Constitution. Specifically, it analyzes whether the mere filing of a motion for reconsideration automatically cancels the confirmation of an appointment, or if it only reopens the appointment for approval or disapproval by the majority of the Commission's members. The controlling principle is the Altarejos v. Solo case, which interpreted the revised rules of the Commission on Appointments. It held that a motion for reconsideration does not invalidate a confirmation, but only reopens the appointment for approval or disapproval by the Commission's majority. There is also a distinction between appointments made during Congress' recess and those made while Congress is in session.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Als DOC, PDF, TXT herunterladen oder online auf Scribd lesen
    Markieren Sie unangemessene Inhalte
    von 2

    PACETE V . COM M ISION ON APPOINTM ENTS (1971) F ernand o, J. : F AC TS: -O n Apri l 14 , 1 96 6, Pe ti ti one r F el i zardo Pace te , al l e gi ng that he a!

    appoi nte d "# the Pre !i de nt a! the $%ni ci pal J %dge o& Pi gca a#an, C ota"ato, &i le d a !%i t &or 'anda '%! and prohi "i ti on to co'pe l the Se cre tar# o& C o''i !!i on on Appoi nt'e nt! to i !!%e hi ' ce rti &i cate o& con&i r'ati o n. -Pe ti ti one r a! appoi nte d on A%g%!t ( 1, 19 64 . )e a!!%'e d o&&i ce on Se pte '"e r 1 1, 1 96 4 and di !char ge d hi ! d%ti e ! a! !%ch. -)i ! appoi nt'e n t a! 'ade d%ri ng re ce !! o& C ongre !! "and a! !%"'i tte d at i t! ne *t !e !!i on i n 19 6+ , O n $a# ,- , 19 6+ , )i ! appoi n t'e nt a! %nani 'o %!l # con&i r'e d. -O n F e "r%ar# ., 19 66 , The Se cre tar# o& J %!ti ce !e nt hi ' a le tte r orde ri ng hi ' to /acate hi ! po!i ti on "e ca%!e hi ! con&i r'ati o n a! "#-pa!!e d. -0 he n he i n1%i re d a"o%t i t, he l e arne d that on $a# ,1 , 1 96 +, one da# a&te r hi ! con&i r'ati on, Se n. 2o&ol &o 3anzo n, 'e '"e r o& C o''i !!i on on App oi nt'e n t!, rote to C hai r'an o& the C o''i !!i on on Appoi nt'e nt! to &i le &or a 'oti on &or re con!i de rati on on pe ti ti one r4 ! con&i r'ati o n i n /ie o& de rogator# i n&or'ati o n re ce i /e d "# Se n. 3anzo n. -The Se cre tar# o& C o''i !!i on on Appoi nt'e nt! noti &i e d Se cre tar# o& J %!ti ce re gardi n g the practi ce that a 'oti on o& re con!i de rati on a%to' ati cal l # cance l ! the con&i r'ati o n o& appoi nt 'e nt in 1%e !ti on. -Pe ti ti one r C o''i !!i on e *e rci !e ! po conte nd! that the on App oi nt'e n t! e r to appro/e or re5 e ct

    appoi nt 'e nt! thr% 'a5 ori t# /ote ! o& 'e '"e r! i n the 1%or%' and not thr% 'e '"e r! i ndi /i d%al l # a! pro/i de d "# Se c. 1 - o& i t! 2%l e !. -2e !ponde nt! conte nd that the S%pre 'e C o%rt ha! no 5 %ri !di cti on "e ca%!e the ca!e onl # i n/ol /e ! i nte rnal r%l e ! o& C o''i !!i on on Appoi nt 'e nt!. The re are no con!ti t%ti onal 1%e !ti on! i n/ol /e d. 6 SS78S A9 : 27; 6 9 3: 6 SS78 <1 : 0 O 9 S7P28$8 C O 72T )AS J726 S:6 C T6 O9 =e !. The ca!e i n/ol /e ! i nte rpre tati on o& the C on!ti t%ti on re gardi n g the po e r! o& C o''i !!i on on Appoi nt 'e nt!. 6 SS78 <, : 0O9 P8T6 T6O 9 824 S APPO 6 9 T$89 T $7ST > 8 C O 9F 6 2$8: =e !. The control l i ng pri nci pl e i! Al tare 5 o! /. $ol o hi ch i nte rpre te d 2%l e , 1 o& the 2e /i !e d 2%l e ! o& C o''i !!i on on Appoi nt 'e nt!. 6t hel d that 'e re &i li ng o& 'oti on &or re con!i de rati on di d not ha/e the e&&e ct o& !e tti ng a!i de a con&i r'ati on. 6 n!te ad, i t i l l onl # re ope n the appoi nt 'e nt and !%"'i t it &or appro/al or di !appr o/al "# the 'a5 ori t# o& 'e '"e r! o& the C o''i !!i on on Appoi nt 'e nt!. $ore o/e r, the re i! di !ti ncti on "e t e e n appoi nt 'e nt! 'ade d%ri ng re ce !! o& C ongre !! and appoi n t'e nt! hil e C ongre !! i ! i n !e !!i on. 0 he n C ongre !! i ! i n !e !!i on, pre !i de nti al no'i ne e ! can onl # a!!%'e o&&i ce once con&i r'e d "# the C o''i !!i on on Appoi nt 'e nt!. 0 he n C ongre !! i ! i n re ce !!, the Pre !i de nt 'a?e ! ad i nte ri ' appoi nt 'e nt! hi ch ta?e e&&e ct at once . The i ndi /i d%al cho!e n 'a# 1%al i &# and pe r&or' hi ! &%ncti on. The appoi nt 'e nt i ! e&&e cti /e %nti l the di !appro/ al o& the C o''i !!i on on

    Appoi nt'e nt! or ne *t ad5 o%rn'e nt o& C ongre !!.

    Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen