Republic of the Philippines Third Judicial Region REGIONAL TRIAL COURT City of San Fernando, Pampanga Branch 69 PEOPLE

OF THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff, -versusJUDAS ISCARIOT, Accused. '"""""""""""""""""""""' MOTION FOR REINVESTIGATION ACCUSED, through the undersigned counsel, to this %onorable Court, most respectfully state( ! That this case )as filed by the %onorable *sst State City Prosecutor )ithout the benefit of the accused ans)ering the charges against him+ , That )hile the resolution of the %onorable *sst City Prosecutor states that the accused )as unable to submit his counter-ailing e-idence despite numerous efforts of the .ffice to inform him of the complaint filed against him and the scheduled preliminary in-estigation, ne-ertheless, the accused )as not really informed that there )as a case filed against him )ithout his fault /n fact, the information )as filed on June ,#!,, and that the accused )as arrested only this 0ecember ,#!$ )hen the accused )ent to the police station to testify in a stabbing incident, ho)e-er, )hen found out by the policemen the name of the accused, that there )as a standing )arrant against him, the policemen instantly arrested the accused $ That this motion is anchored on the fact, that accused in this case has a -alid defense ranged against the sole affida-it of the complainant )ithout any corresponding e-idence as to the o)nership of the said grinder sub1ect of this case e'cept the positi-e assertion of the pri-ate complainant+ 2 * person cannot be held liable for theft on the property belonging to them /t is the pri-ate complainant )ho s)indled the grandfather 3o)ner of the grinder4 of the accused )hen the pri-ate complainant failed to pay the agreed rental payment of P $## ## per day The pri-ate complainant merely paid P,## ## for t)o"day use of the grinder, )hich is )hy they too5 bac5 the property they o)ned as the agreement is in a per day basis, the o)ner is entitled to the possession of the property e-ery ne't day unless the renter e'tends the same, or unless the renter pays the agreed amount /t is the pri-ate complainant )ho is obligated to pay the balance of P 2## ## )hich the pri-ate complainant unla)fully refused to pay 6 The amount of the grinder as reflected in the receipt is only P ,,7## ## contrary to the allegation of the false pretender"o)ner pri-ate complainant )hich is P
1|Page

CRIM. CASE NO !9"!##!$ FOR: T%&FT

6,### ## The receipt spea5s for itself that herein pri-ate complainant8s credibility is already in doubt 6 *ttached herein are the affida-it of the o)ner Peter 9riffin and the receipt of the grinder paid by Peter 9riffin )hich receipt is in his possession since January !:, ,#!, until today WHEREFORE, premises considered, it is most respectfully prayed of this %onorable Court, that the foregoing motion be favorabl !ra"#$%. City of San Fernando, Pampanga, 0ecember ,2, ,#!$ 3Sgd 4 *tty Rommelito Francisco & ;acarayo Co&"'$l for A((&'$% !$"69 Barrac5s Building, ;ari5ina /BP <. 7:!,$":=!9=!,"*C PTR <. 6699!$=,!=!,"*C Roll <o 99997 ;C>& &'empt 3*dmitted to the bar( *pril 6, ,#!,4

NOTICE AND RE)UEST FOR HEARING T*$ +ra"(* Cl$r, of Co&r# RTC BR*<C% 69 C-# Pro'$(&#or City of San Fernando
2|Page

Sir( Please calendar the foregoing ;otion for hearing on 0ecember !$, ,#!$ at !#($# o8cloc5 in the morning or at the earliest possible calendar of this %onorable Court, sans personal appearance of undersigned counsel

A## . Ro..$l-#o Fra"(-'(o E. Ma(ara o Co/ f&r"-'*$%: *tty *ntonio *ntonio > Santos CIT0 PROSECUTOR City Prosecutor8s .ffice City of San Fernando

3|Page