0 Bewertungen0% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (0 Abstimmungen)
988 Ansichten2 Seiten
The document presents the pros and cons of extending marriage benefits to same-sex couples. The pros include: enforcing natural rights to life, liberty and happiness; extending over 1000 federal benefits to all couples; and maintaining separation of church and state as religious arguments are not a valid basis for law. The cons argue it may imply discrimination is acceptable; break traditional definitions of marriage; contradict some religious beliefs; and possibly change the definition of marriage as a religious term. Sources for the information are provided.
Originalbeschreibung:
A civics assignment that I had to do about the pros and cons of legalizing same sex marriage
The document presents the pros and cons of extending marriage benefits to same-sex couples. The pros include: enforcing natural rights to life, liberty and happiness; extending over 1000 federal benefits to all couples; and maintaining separation of church and state as religious arguments are not a valid basis for law. The cons argue it may imply discrimination is acceptable; break traditional definitions of marriage; contradict some religious beliefs; and possibly change the definition of marriage as a religious term. Sources for the information are provided.
The document presents the pros and cons of extending marriage benefits to same-sex couples. The pros include: enforcing natural rights to life, liberty and happiness; extending over 1000 federal benefits to all couples; and maintaining separation of church and state as religious arguments are not a valid basis for law. The cons argue it may imply discrimination is acceptable; break traditional definitions of marriage; contradict some religious beliefs; and possibly change the definition of marriage as a religious term. Sources for the information are provided.
Topic: Same-sex couples should be extended the benefit of marriage Pros: 1) The natural and expressed rights of Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness are enforced and are not taken away from a group of people (usually called unconstitutional by the United States) 2) The Human Rights Campaign (henceforth referred to as the HRC) has published a list of over 1000 benefits of marriage. These benefits will be extended to all couples. 3) Separation of church and state will be enforced. The constitution maintains that the United States government will make no law respecting an establishment of religion. The majority of arguments against same-sex marriage is based on a religious standpoint. The federal government is not allowed to use religion as a basis for government. 4) Increase in adoption rates 5) Financial increases, due to the financial benefits of marriage Cons: 1) The governments banning (or allowing states to ban) of same-sex marriages implies that discrimination against same-sex couples is okay. 2) Break in the traditional definition of marriage, even though said definition is inaccurate. It is what our society defines marriage as, and allowing same- sex marriage will break this image. 3) Religious majorities in the United States believe in typical gender roles which may or may not apply to same-sex couples. 4) Homosexuality is consider a sin in most major religions prominent in the United States (particularly within major sects of Christianity). 5) The definition of marriage may change, as marriage is a religious (Jewish and Christian) term. The expansion of the definition of marriage is offensive to these religious groups (although the term marriage is only used by the government to describe a civil union and may or may not be religious). Sources: 1) https://www.hrc.org/resources/entry/an-overview-of-federal-rights-and- protections-granted-to-married-couples 2) http://gaymarriage.procon.org/#pro_con 3) http://www.huffingtonpost.com/tag/pros-and-cons-of-same-sex-marriages 4) http://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/same-sex-marriage-pros-cons- 30219.html Zane Billings and Hannah Haymaker March 19, 2014 2 nd Period