A left wing historians view: War Communism was essentially a
pragmatic response to the strains of the civil war War Communism was no more than a temporary diversion from the mixed economy that Lenin had presided over between the October Revolution and the Civil War. This is a very sympathetic view of Lenin and suggests that the ‘soft’ socialism that he practiced which allowed some free market economy to exist was the ‘real’ Leninist policy.
Evidence: Lenin does revert to a New Economic Policy in 1921 that
allows some free trade.
A right wing historians view: War Communism was a direct product of
Leninist ideology. This is a less sympathetic view of Lenin, historians who are to the right believe that his use of state power were at the heart of his revolutionary ideology. As far as right wing interpretations are concerned, War Communism was directly introduced in order to introduce socialism by decree, to create a totalitarian state. They made concessions to the free market in 1921 only because the country was bankrupt and starving. This means there is a logical progression between War Communism and the later planned economy of Stalin.
Evidence: The party was split at the introduction of the NEP
between pragmatic survivalists and the orthodox Bolsheviks who wanted to retain War Communism or go even further.
A third view: The argument that War Communism was simply
pragmatism is flawed because the policy itself was a disaster. Trying to