Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Mickey Allen
English 101
Mrs. Kelly
Versatility in Poetry
Within the following few paragraphs are examples of the liberties and versatilities of
poetry writers are allowed. Although both of the poems referred to below are small, each
contains several similes and hyperboles. This will be an attempt to compare each writer’s
content.
William Blake’s, “The Sick Rose” contains only eight lines but many hyperboles. Mr.
Blake describes a rose in a way that by the end of the poem the reader is offered many different
possibilities as to what the true subject may be. It is entirely the reader’s choice to decide upon
the matter.
Robert Burns, “A Red, Red rose” on the other hand, leaves very little to guess upon. The
reader knows exactly what the writer is referring to. The writer even spells the word love two
different ways and still the reader understands exactly what the subject is, “O, my Luve’s like a
William Blake’s, “The Sick Rose” at the end conveys a sense of finality and destruction
with the line: “Does thy life destroy.”(8), which the reader unmistakably understands as an end.
Very much unlike Robert Burns’ “A Red, Red Rose”, in which from beginning to end he
transfers from his words to the reader’s mind the optimism, hope, and confidence of his feelings.
At any rate, the difference between these two poems, in my opinion, is how Mr. Blake’s
poem can be received completely different by each individual reader. This is a very short piece
of work and at the same time a complex hyperbole. However Mr. Burns’ poem leaves no choice
for the reader but to understand completely that love, any way it is spelled, is exactly the theme
he has on his mind. No doubt, poetry allows any writer liberty and versatility to describe what
Works Cited
Blake, William. “The Sick Rose.” Literature: The Norton Introduction to Literature.
Eds. Alison Booth, J. Paul Hunter, Kelly J. Mays. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 2005.
Burns, Robert. “A Red, Red Rose.” Literature: The Norton Introduction to Literature.
Eds. Alison Booth, J. Paul Hunter, Kelly J. Mays. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 2005.