CLASSROOM Rebekah van Oostveen 100235444 Abstract Due to the increase and availability of technology in the world today, uch research has been done on the e!ectiveness of technology, s"eci#cally one$to$one co"uter initiatives on student learning% &his research "ro"osal looks at the historical data regarding one$to$one co"uter initiatives and their #ndings, and "ro"oses a new direction in research for use of the one$to$one co"uter initiatives% &he research "ro"osal suggests co"aring three schools using one$to$one co"uter "rograing to three schools, of siilar deogra"hics, that are not using one$to$one co"uter "rograing% &he research would focus on collecting 'ualitative data in the for of interviews, observations and blogs fro teachers and students to deterine the e!ects of the one$to$ one co"uter "rograing on the engageent and otivation of students% &he data would be analy(ed by a triangulation ethod searching for thees that would su""ort the "rinci"les of engageent theory% &he research ho"es to su""ort #ndings that using one$to$one co"uter initiatives would increase the engageent and otivation of students by using s"eci#c activities that su""ort the develo"ent of these i"ortant characteristics% 1.0 Histrica! Data R"#ar$i%# O%"-T-O%" C&'(t"r I%itiati)"s &echnology within the classroo has been an ongoing discussion of whether or not it bene#ts the students in their learning and ultiately their acadeic achieveent% )any view technology as the ost signi#cant tool that can be used to in*uence student achieveent, and change the roles and odels of traditional teaching +,haberlain, 2004-% ."eci#cally, one$to$one co"uting initiatives are becoing increasingly "o"ular around the world due to decreased costs, wider availability to internet access, and a changing view of education% / one$to$one classroo environent "rovides every student in that classroo with the o""ortunity to use a la"to" with lessons or activities that are student$centered and s"eci#cally designed for the use of the la"to"s +0enuel, 2001-% One of the ain studies in one$to$one co"uter initiatives has been develo"ed by the )aine 2earning &echnology 3nitiative, which andates that all 4 th and 5 th grade students and teachers be "rovided with a la"to", technical assistance and "rofessional develo"ent +enabling 34 000 students and 3 000 teachers-% &he study, re"orted by .ilvernail and 2ane +2004-, used a blended ethod of 'ualitative +through site visits, surveys, observations, and interviews- and 'uantitative +data retrieved fro surveys and docuent analysis- research% &he study also focused on the i"acts on learning skills used within the classroo fro teachers and student "ers"ectives% &he student "ers"ectives +based on survey results- found that over 506 of students were better organi(ed for class, 406 were ore involved in school and related activities, and would do ore work with a la"to" than without% 506 of the students surveyed entioned that they would rather use the la"to" than any other technology available if given the choice% &eachers also re"orted that students were ore actively involved in their lessons and within their learning% 3nterestingly, the results showed arkedly ore i"roveent in students who are labeled as s"ecial education students and students who are considered high risk in the areas entioned above +.ilvernail 7 2ane, 2004-% 3n another one$to$one co"uter initiative, conducted by ,haberlain +2004-, students in 8irginia +Henrico County Public Schools) were also given the opportunity to use laptop computers as an effective tool for learning. This study involved 45 randomly selected students from a pool of ! """ in a #ualitative manner using focus groups$ observations$ and student logs. %ue to the #ualitative measure of the study$ results were mainly seen through comments of the students within their focus group sessions. &n the focus groups they were as'ed ( #uestions specifically related to their e)periences with the laptop in each session. The comments were also logged in terms of how many students actually responded. The students reported large change in their classroom and school e)perience whereby the students completed more wor' in one class period$ and they en*oyed being able to access information #uic'ly as well as new information that they could not previously access. The students also recogni+ed that individuals that are shy or generally unresponsive to typical school activities were more willing to interact with others and the material. The students also highly recommended the program and commented that it not only taught them computer s'ills$ but it also taught them responsibility and gave them more independence in their learning. Students did also comment on a few negative aspects including a lac' of technology support for their computers when not wor'ing functionally. They recommended that every school have a computer technician that was available at any moment. The students also commented that some students cannot handle being on the computer because they become too distracted by the material they can access. The students were also concerned with the filtering process of websites$ saying that incorrect sites were filtered and that they may get in trouble for finding an unfiltered site accidentally. ,nother study$ completed by -ule' and %emirtas .!""5)$ included "/5 students who were split into study groups of 0 th to / th grade students who were using laptops and students who were not using laptops. This study was done in a private school where over 4"1 of parents have attended graduate school$ //1 have graduated from college or university$ and less than 1 of students are 2economically disadvantaged.3 %ue to these demographics$ a comparison between students with laptops and without laptops within the same school was necessary. The study used #uantitative measures to gauge student achievement such as grade point average .-P,)$ end of course grades and scores on two standardi+ed tests. The results showed that the students using laptops had significantly higher -P,4s as well as higher end of course grades. They also noted that the students using the laptops on a day5to5day basis also performed at a proficient level .a rubric scoring of 6 out of 4) on a district writing assessment standardi+ed test signifying that a ma*ority of the students with laptops met the district grade level e)pectations$ but a lower percentage of students without laptops did met the same level. The students using laptops also go beyond the national average for proficiency in language arts and math within the 7nited States$ where students without laptops were found to have average results. Schaumberg .!"") conducted two studies$ which were concentrated on a variety of student demographics while using laptops in a one5to5one classroom environment. The first included 6"" students .from grade 8 to grade ") and the second included 45 students .( th grade). The first study used video logs and on site observation in 5 minute intervals to determine the student use and affect on student learning. The second study was primarily focusing on the difference between female and male computer literacy and confidence with the laptop. The first study4s .Schaumberg$ !""a) results showed students were led in purposeful guided discussions that included research using the laptops. The researcher noted students were more actively involved in group wor' and were able to critically analy+e their written and finished wor'. The researcher also found that student organi+ation increased over time and the students were actively archiving previous wor' and data. The laptops also fostered and increase in individual wor'. The second study4s .Schaumberg$ !""b) results demonstrated that boys generally have a greater confidence in their computer s'ills than girls$ however girls usually outperformed the boys in certain program s'ills and computer 'nowledge. The girls also gained significant confidence in their s'ills over time and increased their comfort with the machine for day5to5day use. Schaumberg related these findings to possible increase in student learning$ not only in computer literacy$ but also in a number of different sub*ects. The last study focuses on online collaborative pro*ects while students are using laptop computers in their classrooms .-aynor and 9raser$ !""!). This study was measuring the efficacy of the laptops$ as well as the online learning and collaborative wor' using a common online program and tas'. The students were as'ed to create an e5postcard using the online program given to them. The sub*ects were interviewed and #uantitatively measured based on the common tas'. They found that as the students used their laptops in increasing amounts$ the ability to engage in larger in#uiry5based activities increased. The research demonstrated that the students were highly motivated. The #uantitative data$ however$ showed that academically the tas' and laptops mostly increased their communication s'ills and vocabulary usage$ but other areas such as information return and 'nowledge did not show a mar'ed increase. The research mentioned that due to the vague nature of the assignment it allowed students the opportunity to design and create their ideas based on their interests. This created a chance for the students to develop independence and a sense of ownership over their education. *.0 T+"r"tica! Fra&",r-. R"s"arc+ /("sti% a%$ H0't+"sis 9ithin the study of one$to$one co"uter initiatives, not any research studies have looked u"on the increase in engageent and otivation with students who are involved in the one$to$one co"uter "rogra% :ngageent theory, develo"ed by ;earsley and .chniederan +1<<<-, is a "roinent theory develo"ed "ur"osely for use within technology$integrated classroos% &he theory states that while using technology, students ust be engaged in eaningful learning activities that will allow the to interact with others and "erfor tasks that are "ractical beyond the classroo% ;earsley and .chneideran +1<<<- believe that technology enables student to be involved in =active cognitive "rocesses such as creating, "roble$solving, reasoning, decision$aking, and evaluation% 3n addition, students are intrinsically otivated to learn due to the eaningful nature of the learning environent and activities%> &his study will focus on the ability for the co"uters to "rovide engageent o""ortunities for the students based on several "rinci"les that build engageent% &hese o""ortunities include? activities that are grou" conte@t based and deand collaboration, creative "roAects that are de#ned by the students, and value or contribution based where students are creating a "roduct for the outside world +;earsley 7 .chneideran, 1<<<-% ;earsley and .chniederan +1<<<- also related engageent theory to increasing student otivation when using technology within the classroo% &he "rinci"les that are involved in increasing engageent have also been looked at in increasing otivation for students as well% Bor instance, collaboration and creating "roducts with an authentic a""lication have both been seen to increase students otivation to co"lete the task they are re'uired to do +;earsley 7 .chneideran, 1<<<-% Cowever, there are two ty"es of otivation that can be seen% 3ntrinsic otivation is the otivation in which a "erson is able to internali(e the value of an activity and can identify with the activity% 9here e@trinsic otivation is the result of e@ternal deands such as rewards or conse'uences +.tory et al%, 200<-% 3ntrinsic otivation factors that can be seen with any students is the belief that the students can succeed and co"lete the task, ado"ting a sense of astery within the task, and being con#dent in their abilities to do the task% :@trinsic otivation relies on factors such as "erforance outcoes, laid out acadeic goals that are not associated with astery, as well as the conse'uences of failure +.tory et al%, 200<-% .tudy is needed to deterine whether engageent activities involving technology, s"eci#cally one$to$one co"uter initiatives, can build otivation within students, intrinsic or e@trinsic, while "erforing these activities% &he research 'uestions that will be addressed by this study are? /re one$to$one co"uter initiatives i"roving student engageent and otivation within the classrooD /re teachers noticing a di!erence in student engageent and otivationD /re students noticing a di!erence in student engageent and otivationD /re there any issues that hinder student engageent and otivationD &he "redicted outcoes of this study is that if technology is ade'uately used within the classroo through a one$to$one co"uter based initiative, then students will becoe ore engaged and otivated to succeed because of the use of engageent activities which "rovide the students with o""ortunities to collaborate, create and develo" authentic "roducts% 1.0 M"t+$!#02 D"si#% &he study would be using ethodological triangulation of three di!erent 'ualitative data recovery ethods? interview, observations, and blogs &riangulation hel"s to build validity of 'ualitative results and hel"s to better understand the results by erging and analy(ing i@ed ethods of data collection% &riangulation "rovides a better background, in ters of validity and reliability for the collaboration of the results% Bor instance, the observations seen in the classroo will hel" to validate the re"ort given by the teacher and the student +RisAord et al%, 2002-% &riangulation will be done to analy(e the results, using the studentEteacher blogs, the interviews and observations% &he researcher will be looking for siilar issues and thees that will be deonstrated% Bor e@a"le? all three of the data collection ay show a thee of increasing leadershi" roles by the students using the co"uters in grou" "roAects% &he thees will be categori(ed de"endent u"on the three "rinci"les of engageent? collaboration, creativity, and authenticity of "roducts% &here will also be a recurring thee of issues that ay be hindering the aount of student engageent that ay be seen within the classroo% 1.1 M"t+$!#02 Partici'a%ts Schools: &he research will be focused on three schools that are using one$to$one co"uter initiatives% &he schools will need to be high school aged students +"referably grades 10$12-% &he study will also co"are results with three schools that are not using one$to$one co"uter initiatives% /ll schools will need to be of siilar econoic, acadeic and deogra"hics so that coon thees can be ade'uately co"ared% Teachers: &he research study will need 3$1 teachers fro each school using full integration of one$to$one co"uter "rogras and 3$1 teachers fro each school not using integration of one$to$one co"uter "rogras% Students: &he research study will need 1$5 students fro the classes of the "revious teachers using one$to$one co"uter "rogras and 1$5 students fro the classes of the "revious teachers not using one$to$ one co"uter "rogras% &he students are to be in grades 10$12 as this is the focus age grou" of the study due to lack of "revious research of one$to$one co"uter initiatives beyond a iddle school a""lication% 1.* M"t+$!#02 I%str(&"%ts &he research study will be using three 'ualitative ethods of data recovery for this study% &he ethods being used are interviews with students and teachers, researcher observation, and student and teacher blogs% Interview: &eachers and students will be "artici"ating in interviews led by the researcher% &he interviews will be recorded and asked in the for of o"en$ended 'uestions that are "reviously structured to deonstrate "ers"ectives on engageent and otivation within the classroo% &he 'uestions will also look at any issues that are hindering the engageent or otivation within the classroo% &he interviews will be conducted once every two onths during the school year% &he #rst one would be at the beginning of the school year to deonstrate "ers"ectives at the beginning of the "rogra% &he ne@t one would be two onths after the start of the school year and "rogra to allow for o"tial "rogra o"eration% Observations: Observations will be done by the researcher based on a "redeterined scale looking for engageent and otivation deonstrated by the students based on "redeterined cues for what signi#es engageent and otivation and organi(ed "reviously de"endent u"on the three "rinci"les of engageent theory% &he observation checklist will include such obAects such as the aount of collaboration, tasks that involve signi#cant creation, and tasks that ay involve the develo"ent of authentic "roducts% &he researcher, using a digital cacorder, will record the observations% Teacher and Student Blogs: &eachers and students will be re'uired to co"lete bi$weekly blogs +online Aournals- recording their observations of engageent and otivation within the classroo using +or not using- the co"uters% .tudents and teachers will be guided in what to look for as cues for engageent and otivation within the classroo using the three "rinci"les of engageent theory? collaboration, creation and authenticity of tasks% 3.0 A%a!0sis a%$ H'"4(! Fi%$i%#s &he analysis will be done with a triangulation ethod after the interviews and observations are transcribed and the blogs are analy(ed% &riangulation will look for recurring thees throughout all of the work to see if engageent activities are been done ore often with the classroos that are using the one$to$one co"uter "rograing% &hese engageent activities will include using any ty"es of collaboration activities between students, using any ethods of creating "roducts and allowing students to design and develo" their own "roAect based work, as well as creating authentic and realistic "roducts fro the work that they are doing% /ll three of the ethods of data collection are set u" for increasing the validity and reliability of the clais that are ade in each of the ethods% &he #ndings that should be shown fro this research is that there is ore engaging activities that will increase student otivation by using the one$to$one co"uter "rograing than what will be seen in a conventional classroo% &he study will ho"efully also #nd any issues that need to be addressed for those that are thinking about incor"orating technology within the classroo and how to "ossibly avoid these "robles% 3f these hy"otheses are true, this could lead to ore research to be done using other ethods of technology within the classroo such as social networking, obile devices, hand held devices and any ore% &he increase in technology can o"en a new world to these students and ho"efully lead to a global oveent of engaging students using a""ro"riate and e!ective technological resources% R"4"r"%c"s2 ,haberlain, )%:% +2004-% )iddle school studentsF "erce"tions of the teaching and learning initiative? la"to"s for every student% Unpubl ished dissertati on, Retrieved fro htt"?EEscholar%li b%vt%eduEthesesEavailableEetd$04252004$ 103434EunrestrictedE,C/)G:H5%"df Iaynor, 3% 9% and Braser, G% J% +2003-% Online collaborative "roAects? / Aourney for two Kear 5 technology rich classroos% Proceedings Western Australian Institute for Educational esearch !oru" #$$%& Retrieved fro htt"?EEwww%waier%org%auEforusE2003Egaynor%htl Iulek, J% ,% 7 Deirtas, C% +2005-% 2earning with technology? &he i"act of la"to" use on student achieveent% Journal of &echnology, 2earning, and /ssessent, 3+2-% /vailable fro htt"?EEwww%Atla%org ;earsley, I%, 7 .chneideran, G% +1<<<-% Engage"ent theor': a fra"ewor( for technol og' based teaching and learning % Retrieved fro htt"?EEhoe%s"rynet%coEHgkearsleyEengage%ht 0enuel, 9,R,% +2001, /"ri l 2-% 3"leentation and e!ects of one$to one co"uting ini tiatives? a research synthesis% ed Orbit, Retrieved fro htt"?EEwww%redorbit%coEnewsEeducationE454015Ei"leen tationLandLe!ectsLofLonetooneLco"utingLinitiativesLaLre searchLsynthesisE RisAord, )%.%, Dunbar, .%G%, 7 )oloney, )%B% +2002-% / Mew foundation for ethodological triangulation % )ournal of *ursing Scholarship, %++3-, 21<$245% .chauberg, C% +2001a-% &he 3"act of obile co"uters in the classroo? results fro an ongoing video study % Unpubl ished esearch eport, Retrieved fro htt"?EEwww%notesys%coE,o"iesEaect01%"df .chauberg, C% +2001b-% Bostering gi rlsF co"uter literacy through la"to" learning? can obi le co"uter learning level out the gender di!erenceD Unpubl ished esearch eport, Retrieved fro htt"?EEwww%notesys%coE,o"iesEnecc01%"df .tory, 0%/%, Cart, J%9%, .tasson, )%B%, 7 )ahoney, J%)% +200<-% Nsing a &wo$factor theory of achieveent otivation to e@aine % Personali t' and Individual ,i-erences, +., 3<1O3<5% .i lvernail, D%2%, 7 2ane, D%)%)% +2004-% &he 3"act of ainePs one$ to$one la"to" "rogra % Unpubl ished esearch eport, Retrieved fro htt"?EEavoca34techco%edublogs%orgE#lesE2001E11Elti$ "hase$one$evaluation$re"ort%"df